Manual&Automation Testing Basic Facts
Manual&Automation Testing Basic Facts
Manual Testing is the most primitive of all testing types and helps find bugs in the
software system.
Any new application must be manually tested before its testing can be
automated. Manual Testing requires more effort, but is necessary to
check automation feasibility.
Please be patient. The Video will load in some time. If you still face issue viewing
video click here
Test Suites or cases ,are designed during the testing phase and should have
100% test coverage.
It also makes sure that reported defects are fixed by developers and re-testing
has been performed by testers on the fixed defects.
Basically, this testing checks the quality of the system and delivers bug-free
product to the customer.
Fact: Testing attempts to find as many defects as possible. Identifying all possible
defects is impossible.
Fact: 100% test automation cannot be done. Manual Testing is also essential.
Any type of application can be tested Automated testing is recommended only for
manually, certain testing types like ad-hoc stable systems and is mostly used
and monkey testing are more suited for for Regression Testing
manual execution.
Manual testing can be become repetitive and The boring part of executing same test cases
boring. time and again, is handled by automation
software in Automation Testing.
Conclusion
Manual testing is an activity where the tester needs to be very patient, creative
& open minded.
Automation Testing means using an automation tool to execute your test case
suite.
The automation software can also enter test data into the System Under Test,
compare expected and actual results and generate detailed test reports. Test
Automation demands considerable investments of money and resources.
Please be patient. The Video will load in some time. If you still face issue viewing
video click here
The following category of test cases are not suitable for automation:
Test Cases that are newly designed and not executed manually at least
once
Test Cases for which the requirements are frequently changing
Test cases which are executed on an ad-hoc basis.
Test Execution
Automation Scripts are executed during this phase. The scripts need input test
data before there are set to run. Once executed they provide detailed test reports.
Execution can be performed using the automation tool directly or through the Test
Management tool which will invoke the automation tool.
Example: Quality center is the Test Management tool which in turn it will invoke
QTP for execution of automation scripts. Scripts can be executed in a single
machine or a group of machines. The execution can be done during the night, to
save time.
Maintenance
As new functionalities are added to the System Under Test with successive
cycles, Automation Scripts need to be added, reviewed and maintained for each
release cycle.Maintenance becomes necessary to improve the effectiveness
of Automation Scripts.
The above guidelines if observed can greatly help in making your automation
successful.
Environment Support
Ease of use
Testing of Database
Object identification
Image Testing
Error Recovery Testing
Object Mapping
Scripting Language Used
Support for various types of test - including functional, test management,
mobile, etc...
Support for multiple testing frameworks
Easy to debug the automation software scripts
Ability to recognize objects in any environment
Extensive test reports and results
Minimize training cost of selected tools
Features:
Risk-based testing
Scriptless end-to-end test automation
Supports API, BI, Mobile, Cross Browser, RPA and other automation
testing types
The industry’s most extensive technical support
Download Tricentis
2. mabl
mabl delivers scriptless end-to-end test automation, integrated with your delivery
pipeline, so you can focus on improving your app.
Features:
3. Selenium
It is a software testing tool used for Regression Testing. It is an open source
testing tool that provides playback and recording facility for Regression Testing.
The Selenium IDE only supports Mozilla Firefox web browser.
Download Selenium
Download QTP
6. WATIR
It is an open source testing software for regression testing. It enables you to write
tests that are easy to read and maintain. Watir supports only internet explorer on
windows while Watir webdriver supports Chrome, Firefox, IE, Opera, etc.
Download Watir
7. SilkTest
Silk Test is designed for doing functional and regression testing. For e-business
application, silk test is the leading functional testing product. It is a product of
Segue Software takeover by Borland in 2006. It is an object-oriented language
just like C++. It uses the concept of an object, classes, and inheritance. Its main
feature includes
Download SilkTest
Conclusion
The right selection of automation tool, testing process, and team, are important
players for automation to be successful. Manual and automation methods go
hand-in-hand for successful testing.
Automated Testing Vs. Manual Testing:
What’s the difference?
What is Manual Testing?
Manual testing is testing of the software where tests are executed manually by a
QA Analysts. It is performed to discover bugs in software under development.
In Manual testing, the tester checks all the essential features of the given
application or software. In this process, the software testers execute the test
cases and generate the test reports without the help of any automation software
testing tools.
It is a classical method of all testing types and helps find bugs in software
systems. It is generally conducted by an experienced tester to accomplish the
software testing process.
Automated testing entirely relies on the pre-scripted test which runs automatically
to compare actual result with the expected results. This helps the tester to
determine whether or not an application performs as expected.
Automated testing allows you to execute repetitive task and regression test
without the intervention of manual tester. Even though all processes are
performed automatically, automation requires some manual effort to create initial
testing scripts.
Automation Testing Vs. Manual Testing
Parameter Automation Testing Manual Testing
In manual testing, test cases are
Automation Testing uses automation tools to
Definition executed by a human tester and
execute test cases.
software.
Automated testing is significantly faster than a Manual testing is time-consuming and
Processing time
manual approach. takes up human resources.
Exploratory Exploratory testing is possible in
Automation does not allow random testing
Testing Manual Testing
The initial investment in the Manual
The initial investment in the automated testing
testing is comparatively lower. ROI is
Initial investment is higher. Though the ROI is better in the long
lower compared to Automation testing
run.
in the long run.
Automated testing is a reliable method, as it is Manual testing is not as accurate
Reliability performed by tools and scripts. There is no because of the possibility of the
testing Fatigue. human errors.
For even a trivial change in the UI of the AUT, Small changes like change in id, class,
UI Change Automated Test Scripts need to be modified to etc. of a button wouldn't thwart
work as expected execution of a manual tester.
Investment is required for testing tools as well Investment is needed for human
Investment
as automation engineers resources.
Not cost effective for high volume
Cost-effective Not cost effective for low volume regression
regression.
With automation testing, all stakeholders can Manual Tests are usually recorded in
Test Report
login into the automation system and check test an Excel or Word, and test results are
Visibility
execution results not readily/ readily available.
Parameter Automation Testing Manual Testing
Automated testing does not involve human
The manual testing method allows
Human consideration. So it can never give assurance of
human observation, which may be
observation user-friendliness and positive customer
useful to offer user-friendly system.
experience.
Performance Tests like Load Testing, Stress
Performance Performance Testing is not feasible
Testing, Spike Testing, etc. have to be tested by
Testing manually
an automation tool compulsorily.
Manual tests can be executed in
This testing can be executed on different
Parallel parallel but would need to increase
operating platforms in parallel and reduce test
Execution your human resource which is
execution time.
expensive
You can Batch multiple Test Scripts for nightly
Batch testing Manual tests cannot be batched.
execution.
Programming Programming knowledge is a must in No need for programming in Manual
knowledge automation testing. Testing.
Automation test requires less complex test Manual testing needs have a more
Set up
execution set up. straightforward test execution setup
Done by tools. Its accurate and never gets Repetitive Manual Test Execution can
Engagement
bored! get boring and error-prone.
Manual testing proves useful when the
Automation testing is useful when frequently
Ideal approach test case only needs to run once or
executing the same set of test cases
twice.
Build Executing the Build Verification
Automation testing is useful for Build
Verification Testing (BVT) is very difficult and
Verification Testing (BVT).
Testing time-consuming in manual testing.
Manual Testing has a higher risk of
Automated Tests have zero risks of missing out
Deadlines missing out the pre-decided test
a pre-decided test.
deadline.
Manual Testing does not use
Automation testing uses frameworks like Data
frameworks but may use guidelines,
Framework Drive, Keyword, Hybrid to accelerate the
checklists, stringent processes to draft
automation process.
certain test cases.
Automated Tests acts as a document provides
training value especially for automated unit test Manual Test cases provide no training
Documentation
cases. A new developer can look into a unit test value
cases and understand the code base quickly.
Automated Unit Tests enforce/drive Test Driven Manual Unit Tests do not drive design
Test Design
Development Design. into the coding process
Automated Tests help in Build Verification
Manual Testing defeats the automated
Devops Testing and are an integral part of DevOps
build principle of DevOps
Cycle
Manual Testing is suitable for
Automated Testing is suited for Regression
Exploratory, Usability and Adhoc
When to Use? Testing, Performance Testing, Load Testing or
Testing. It should also be used where
highly repeatable functional test cases.
the AUT changes frequently.
Manual Testing Pros and Cons
Pros of Manual Testing:
Less reliable testing method because it's conducted the human. Therefore,
it is always prone to mistakes & errors.
The manual testing process can't be recorded, so it is not possible to reuse
the manual test.
In this testing method, certain tasks are difficult to perform manually which
may require an additional time of the software testing phase.
Automated testing helps you to find more bugs compare to a human tester
As most of the part of the testing process is automated, you can have a
speedy and efficient process
Automation process can be recorded. This allows you to reuse and execute
the same kind of testing operations
Automated testing is conducted using software tools, so it works without
tiring and fatigue unlike humans in manual testing
It can easily increase productivity because it provides fast & accurate
testing result
Automated testing support various applications
Testing coverage can be increased because of automation testing tool
never forget to check even the smallest unit
Without human element, it's difficult to get insight into visual aspects of
your UI like colors, font, sizes, contrast or button sizes.
The tools to run automation testing can be expensive, which may increase
the cost of the testing project.
Automation testing tool is not yet full proof. Every automation tool has their
limitations which reduces the scope of automation.
Debugging the test script is another major issue in the automated testing.
Test maintenance is costly.
Conclusion
Manual testing is testing of the software where tests are executed manually
by a QA Analyst.
In Automated Software Testing, testers write code/test scripts to automate
test execution.
Manual Testing helps you to get fast and accurate visual feedback.
Automated testing helps you to find more bugs compare to a human tester.
Manual testing is a less reliable testing method because it's conducted by a
human. Therefore, it is always prone to mistakes & errors.
The tools to run automation testing can be expensive, which may increase
the cost of the testing project.
Manual testing is time-consuming and takes up human resources.
Automated testing is significantly faster than a manual approach.