Case B: Case C:: S 2 E 1 EN 1991-1-3: A A, A B
Case B: Case C:: S 2 E 1 EN 1991-1-3: A A, A B
Case b: h = 3 00 m ; b 1 = 2 00 m ; b 2 = 75 00 m .
Case c: h 1 = 1 00 m ; h 2 = 0 80 m ; b 1 = 3 00 m ; b 2 = 6 00 m .
Calculate the exceptional snow drift loads for the three cases mentioned above.
[Reference sheet: Annex B]‐[Cell‐Range: A146:O146‐A247:O247].
Shape coefficients given in figure B3:
Case a: 2 = 1 = min 2h 1 s k ; 5 = min 2 1 00 0 60 ; 5 = min 3 33 ; 5 = 3 33 - .
Case b: 1 = min 2h 1 s k ; 5 = min 2 3 00 0 60 ; 5 = min 10 ; 5 = 5 00 -
with the limit:
2 max b 1 ; b 2 2 75 00 - = 75 00 - (ok).
1 max = ----------------------------------------------------------
- = ------------------------------------------
min b 1 ; min 5h ; 5 m min 2 00 ; 5 00
Case c: 1 = min 2h 1 s k ; 5 = min 2 1 00 0 60 ; 5 = min 3 33 ; 5 = 3 33 - .
2 = min 2h 2 s k ; 5 = min 2 0 80 0 60 ; 5 = min 2 67 ; 5 = 2 67 - .
Exceptional snow drift loads:
Case a: 1 s k = 2 s k = 3 33 0 60 = 2 00 kN / m2 .
Case b: 1 s k = 5 00 0 60 = 3 00 kN / m2 .
Case c: 1 s k = 3 33 0 60 = 2 00 kN / m2 ; 2 s k = 2 67 0 60 = 1 60 kN / m2 .
Each snow drift load is considered to be an accidental action as it is classified as an
extreme condition (see Annex A). Therefore in Ultimate Limit State (ULS) and
Equilibrium (EQU) analyses, no partial factor would be applied to this load.
example-end
EXAMPLE 2-M‐ Shape coefficients for exceptional snow drifts ‐ roofs where drifting occurs at parapets or
adjacent structures ‐ test 3b
Given: An indoor sports hall is to be constructed adjacent to an existing further education
college. It is located 1 km south of Inverness city centre and is 90 m above mean sea level
(with s k = 0 60 kN / m2 ). Calculate the characteristic snow load on the roof of the new
sports hall. The roof pitch angle to the sports hall is 8°.