The Iucn Red List of Threatened Species™
The Iucn Red List of Threatened Species™
NE DD LC NT VU EN CR EW EX
The IUCN Red List is a rich compendium Species assessments are conducted The IUCN Red List Index (RLI) reveals The RLI is calculated from the genuine
of information on threats, ecological following a standardized process using trends in the overall extinction risk changes in IUCN Red List Categories
requirements, and habitats of species; the rigorous IUCN Red List Categories of species and provides an indicator of all assessed species in a taxon over
and on conservation actions that can be and Criteria, ensuring the highest that is used by governments to track time. A decreasing RLI value means
taken to reduce or prevent extinctions. standards of scientific documentation, their progress in achieving targets the expected rate of extinctions is
information management, expert that reduce biodiversity loss. increasing (i.e. the rate of biodiversity
It is based on an objective system review, and justification. loss is increasing). An upward trend or
for assessing the risk of extinction The Red List Index has been increasing RLI value means that there
of a species based on past, There are eight IUCN Red List Categories adopted by the United Nations as is a decrease in expected future rate
present, and projected threats. based on criteria linked to population one of the indicators for the 2015 of species extinctions (i.e. a reduction
trend, size and structure, and geographic Millennium Development Goal 7 in the rate of biodiversity loss).
range. Species listed as Critically on environmental sustainability.
Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable
are collectively described as threatened. It is also a useful tool for assessing
progress towards achieving Target
12 of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
Species on The IUCN Red List
Ac d Ne
ro re d
po
ra p an
ge oc
alli ere
alma nd trop ang
t a – C r i ti c a l l y E s i s p a n c h e ri – E n d
M d
Ta er re
d gu
r siu ere so ge
s tu g cto an
mpa dan s eta End
r a – C ri t i c a ll y E n c e u s – C r i t i c a ll y
About The IUCN Red List
Working together for conservation Scientific journals regularly cite The IUCN Red List is used to inform
The IUCN Red List in peer-reviewed decisions taken by Multilateral
The IUCN Red List is produced literature. Each year numerous new Environmental Agreements. It is often
and managed by the IUCN Global conservation articles examine the values used as a guide to revise the annexes
Species Programme, the Species of The IUCN Red List and refer to its of some agreements, such as the
Survival Commission (SSC) and important contribution to conservation Convention on International Trade in
The IUCN Red List Partnership. planning. Downloads of IUCN Red Endangered Species (CITES) and the
List data from the website show that Convention on Migratory Species (CMS).
The IUCN Red List partners are: “The IUCN Red List tells us where academics from research institutions
BirdLife International; Botanic worldwide export IUCN Red List data The IUCN Red List assessments
Gardens Conservation International;
we ought to be concerned and for research purposes on a daily basis. of freshwater species have also
Conservation International; Microsoft; where the urgent needs are to do contributed to the work of the Ramsar
NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, something to prevent the despoliation Convention in selecting sites that are
Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; of this world. It is a great agenda important for freshwater biodiversity.
Texas A&M University; Wildscreen;
and Zoological Society of London.
for the work of conservationists.” The IUCN Red List will contribute to
Sir David Attenborough the function of the Intergovernmental
science-policy Platform on Biodiversity
and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) to
strengthen the science-policy interface
on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Photography © Robin Moore to improve decision making.
How is The IUCN Red List used? Merendon Palm-Pitviper (Bothriechis thalassinus) Not Evaluated
Photography © Robin Moore
CBD Strategic Goal Aichi Targets for 2020 IUCN Red List
A: Address the underlying 1: Public awareness increased.
causes of biodiversity
loss by mainstreaming 2: Values of biodiversity recognized.
biodiversity across 3: Incentives reformed.
government and society.
4: Sustainable production and consumption promoted.
The Global Environment Facility New information from The IUCN Red
The IUCN Red List shows where action needs to (GEF) has included information from List generates significant media interest
resulting in hundreds of articles on the
be taken to save the building blocks of nature from The IUCN Red List in its resource
allocation framework since 2008. web, printed newspapers, television,
extinction. It provides a straightforward way to factor Other foundations and funding radio and special interest magazines;
raising public awareness of the plight
biodiversity needs into decision-making processes by instruments, such as the Critical
Ecosystem Partnership Fund; SOS of species and the larger environmental
providing a wealth of useful information on species. - Save Our Species; and Mohamed issues surrounding them. The Zoo,
bin Zayed Species Conservation Aquarium and Botanic Garden networks
Fund also use the results of The are supporting The IUCN Red List by
IUCN Red List assessments to guide including the IUCN Red List status
their investments in conservation. on their species information signs.
Arabian Oryx
Seychelles Magpie Robin (Oryx leucoryx)
Lear’s Macaw (Copsychus sechellarum) The regal Arabian Oryx was hunted to near
extinction, with the last wild individual believed
(Anodorhynchus leari) Originally present on several islands in the to be shot in 1972. Thanks to successful
Seychelles, but by 1965 only 12-15 birds captive breeding and re-introduction efforts, the
This rare bird is severely threatened by remained – all on one island. The major Arabian Oryx is now facing a more secure future
trade, and in 1983 the global population was causes of the decline were predation and with its wild population standing at around
estimated to number just 60 birds. It is listed competition by introduced species such as 1,000 individuals. In 2011 it was down-listed
on CITES Appendix I and II and is protected by cats and rats, and reduction in the quality and from the Endangered category to Vulnerable.
Brazilian law. Infiltrations of trading networks quantity of habitat linked with the commercial
and improved surveillance at breeding sites production of crops such as banana. A
have resulted in arrests of poachers, smugglers recovery programme was initiated in 1990.
and collectors. In 2009 this species was In 2005 the species was down-listed from
reassessed from Critically Endangered to Critically Endangered to Endangered, and in
Endangered, and the most recent population 2006 the population reached 178 birds on four
estimates are of over 1,000 birds. islands - a tenfold increase in forty years.
Our target is to make
The IUCN Red List a more complete
“Barometer
of Life”
A broader taxonomic base to species
assessments will enable better
conservation and policy decisions.
160,000 GOAL
77,340
SO FAR
Asessement Goal – 160,000
Species Assessed 2015 – 77,340 African Elephant (Loxodonta africana) Vulnerable
Described Species – 1,889,587 Photography © Robin Moore
White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) Near Threatened Comma (Polygonia c-album) Least Concern (European regional assessment)
Photography © Robin Moore Photography © Marilyn Peddle
Design: PlanningUnit.co.uk
27
IUCN
Rue Mauverney 28
CH-1196 Gland
Switzerland
Tel: + 41 22 999 0000
Fax: + 41 22 999 0015
www.iucn.org/redlist
www.iucnredlist.org
www.iucnredlist.org/donate
Phelsuma antanosy Critically Endangered
Photography © J. C. Randrianantoandro
© IUCN 2015