Scribd
Upload
43 views2 pages

Conclusions and Recommendations

1. The study found that both Selliguea taeniata leaf and Elaeagnus philippinensis leaf contain flavonoids but not alkaloids or anthraquinones, though the latter contains tannins not in the former. 2. There were significant differences in antioxidant effects between treatments combining the two leaf extracts and positive controls, with some treatments having higher effects than others. 3. The researchers recommend repeating the phytochemical analysis of the leaves, repeating the experimentation between treatments for more consistent results, and recomputing the results to correct any errors.

Uploaded by

Liana Guadiz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
43 views2 pages

Conclusions and Recommendations

1. The study found that both Selliguea taeniata leaf and Elaeagnus philippinensis leaf contain flavonoids but not alkaloids or anthraquinones, though the latter contains tannins not in the former. 2. There were significant differences in antioxidant effects between treatments combining the two leaf extracts and positive controls, with some treatments having higher effects than others. 3. The researchers recommend repeating the phytochemical analysis of the leaves, repeating the experimentation between treatments for more consistent results, and recomputing the results to correct any errors.

Uploaded by

Liana Guadiz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusions

1. Both Selliguea taeniata leaf and Elaeagnus philippinensis leaf contain

flavonoids and they also both don’t contain alkaloids and

anthraquinones. While Elaeagnus philippinensis leaf has tannins that

Selliguea taeniata leaf does not have.

2. There is a significant difference between the different combinations of

Elaeagnus philippinensis and Elaeagnus philippinensis leaves and the

positive control, wherein treatment 5 is higher than treatment 6 and 7

which are positive controls and treatment 4 and 3 are higher than

treatment 6.

3. There is a significant difference between the different treatments,

wherein treatment 10, 9, and 8 are significantly different with each

other, but treatment 8 and 5 have the same effect; treatment 5 has

higher effect than treatments 11, 7, 6, 3, 2, 1, and has lower effect than

treatments 10, and 9. Treatment 4 has lower effect than treatments 10,

9, 8, and has higher effect than treatments 2, 1, 11, but has the same

effect as treatment 5; treatment 1 and 2 are not significantly different

than the treatment 11, which is the negative control.

25
Recommendations

The researchers would like to recommend the following:

1. The phytochemical analysis/testing of Selliguea taeniata leaf and

Elaeagnus philippinensis leaf should be repeated since the constituents

tested on the leaves were not the same.

2. The experimentation between the different treatments of Selliguea

taeniata leaf extract and Elaeagnus philippinensis leaf extract should

be repeated to improve the consistency of results.

3. The computation of results should also be repeated to correct any

mistakes on the DPPH absorbamce reading, ANOVA and Duncan

reading.

26

You might also like