Chapter 3: Overview of Auditing Philosophy of Audit Philippine Standards On Auditing
1. Auditing involves systematically obtaining and evaluating evidence to determine the reliability of financial statements and supporting records. It is an independent examination conducted to express an opinion.
2. The objectives of an audit are to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free of material misstatement and to report findings. Auditors plan and perform audits with professional skepticism under established standards.
3. Several types of audits exist, including independent financial statement audits and internal audits, which provide assurance that an entity's operations are effective, efficient, and in compliance with laws and regulations.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views
Chapter 3: Overview of Auditing Philosophy of Audit Philippine Standards On Auditing
1. Auditing involves systematically obtaining and evaluating evidence to determine the reliability of financial statements and supporting records. It is an independent examination conducted to express an opinion.
2. The objectives of an audit are to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free of material misstatement and to report findings. Auditors plan and perform audits with professional skepticism under established standards.
3. Several types of audits exist, including independent financial statement audits and internal audits, which provide assurance that an entity's operations are effective, efficient, and in compliance with laws and regulations.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
CHAPTER 3: OVERVIEW OF AUDITING Philippine Standards on Auditing
- pronouncements on GAAS issued by AASC – applied in
Philosophy of Audit independent examination of entity’s FS conducted for Audit Examination – establishing reliability or unreliability of purpose of expressing opinion the financial statements and supporting records Auditing – form of attestation; expert’s communication about General Types of Audit reliability of someone’s assertion A. Independent Financial Statements Audit Attestation – written communication that express conclusion Nature about reliability of written assertion made by RP - methodical review and objective examination of FS Auditing Defined prepared by RP to determine if such are made in compliance American Accounting Association with FRF Auditing is a: - attest function communicated with clients and third party a) Systematic process – series of steps; information testing - without this company FS would have little reliability since system & testing of transactions and balances company would be reporting on itself b) competent, independent person – qualified to understand Objectives the criteria used; impartial and objective thinking a) obtain reasonable assurance whether FS are free from c) objectively obtains and evaluates evidence – evaluating material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error – results without bias or prejudice enabling auditor to express opinion on its compliance with d) assertions about economic actions and events – SM of FRF auditing; information contained in reports b) report and communicate FS in accordance of auditor’s e) degree of correspondence – closeness of assertions and findings established criteria * when reasonable assurance cannot be obtained, and f) established criteria – standards which assertions are judged qualified opinion is insufficient; disclaim opinion or withdraw g) communicating results – attestation; audit report; from engagement enhances or weakens credibility of assertion h) intended users – rely on auditor’s report Scope – audit procedures to achieve objective a) conduct critical and systematic examination of statements IFAC Education Committee and documents Auditing is a structured process that: b) gather audit evidence a) involves application of analytical skills, professional c) evaluate internal controls for effectiveness judgment, professional skepticism; d) examine validity of assets and liabilities b) performed by team of professionals directed with e) formulate opinion on fairness managerial skills f) prepare audit report c) uses apt forms of technology and adheres methodology g) communicate with parties d) complies with all relevant technical standards e) complies with required standards or professional ethics General Principles of Audit Ethical Requirements Objective - fundamental ethical principles + technical standards PSA 120: Framework of PSA - plan and perform with professional skepticism - enable auditor to express opinion whether FS are prepared materially in accordance with identified financial reporting Reasonable Assurance framework - accumulation of audit evidence to conclude that FS are free - “present fairly, in all material aspects” from material misstatement Inherent Limitations that affects auditor to detect Why Independent Auditing Necessary? misstatements Information Risk – unreliable information will be provided to a) use of testing decision maker; factors that contributes to Info risk: b) inherent limitations of any accounting and internal control 1. Remoteness of information users to providers system 2. Potential bias and motives of info provider c) audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive 3. Voluminous data 4. Complex exchange transactions Responsibility for the FS - management prepares and presents FS which will be How it could be reduced? audited 1. Allow users to verify information – due diligence audit 2. User shares info risk with management 3. Have FS audited Requirements for an Effective FS Audit improving profitability and attainment of objectives 1. Thorough understanding of the entity to be audited 3. Financial Audit – historically oriented, independent 2. Comprehensive knowledge of FRS – recognize material evaluation; ensuring fairness, accuracy, and reliability of departures financial data 3. Solid grasp of concepts of internal control and competence C. Government Audit – reduced need for examination of transaction and balances Nature 4. Knowledgeable in area of evidence gathering and - proper handling of gov’t funds evaluation - compliance with existing laws B. Internal Audit - programs being conducted efficiently Nature Scope - independent, objective assurance and consulting activity to a) Financial and Compliance Audit – financial operations are add value and improve organization’s operations properly conducted; reports are presented fairly; entity - improve effectiveness of risk management control and complied with laws process b) Economy and Efficiency Audit – managing and utilizing Objective resources efficiently; entity complied with laws - assist all members of management in effective discharge of c) Program Results – desired results and benefits achieved; responsibility through analyses, appraisals, and objectives established with legislative; agency considered recommendation alternatives that might yield lower cost
Scope State Audit Divisions
a) reviewing controls and promote effective control at (Primer on Government Accounting and Auditing in PH) reasonable cost 1. Compliance Audit – examination, audit, and settlement in b) ascertaining extent of compliance with established policies accordance to law and regulation c) ascertaining extent to which assets are accounted and 2. Financial Audit – accounting and financial system and safeguards from losses controls to ensure reliability of recorded data; expression of d) ascertaining reliability of management data developed opinion on fairness of financial condition and operation within entity results e) appraising quality of performance in carrying out 3. Performance Audit – objective examination of financial and responsibilities operational performance; opportunities for greater economy, f) recommending operating improvements efficiency, and effectiveness a) Management Audit (Economy and Efficiency) – Responsibility and Authority appraisal of mgt performance and cost benefit analysis - inform and advise management and to discharge b) Program Results Audit (Effectiveness) – evaluation responsibility consistent with Code of Ethics of program results vis-à-vis mgt goals and objectives - coordinate activities with others to achieve audit and organization’s objectives Comprehensive Audit – proper balance among compliance, * Internal auditor has no direct responsibility nor authority to financial and performance audit; test of financial activities reviewed transactions, accounts and reports ensuring laws are properly * Internal auditor must have full access of organizational info adhered
Independence Commission on Audit – highest and final authority in state
- essential to effectiveness of internal auditing auditing - may be obtained from D. Special Audits – audits that fall within the auditing a) Organizational Status – assurance of broad range of standards but not audits of historical FS coverage and adequate consideration a) audits of FS prepared on other comprehensive basis b) Objectivity – not developing procedures or engaging in b) audits of specified elements, accounts, or items activity that compromise independence c) audits of info accompanying basic FS Internal Auditing Approach and Techniques d) compliance with contractual agreements 1. Operational Audit – future-oriented, independent, e) summarized FS systematic evaluation; management of operational activities Types of Auditors controlled by management; improving profitability and 1. Public Accounting Firm – performance of audits of attainment of objectives published historical FS of all publicly traded companies – 2. Management Audit - future-oriented, independent, operational and compliance auditing systematic evaluation; activities of all levels of management; 2. Internal Auditors – hired by entity as consultants or employees of individual companies who perform independent appraisal; provide mgt valuable info in making decisions - independent of line functions; directly reports to audit committee
3. Government Auditors – COA and BIR
I. COA (Compliance Audit) a) presents FS fairly in accordance with FRF and laws b) conduct programs with economy and sufficiency c) desired results achieved
II. BIR (Compliance Audit) – determine whether taxpayers
complied with tax laws
III. Regulatory Auditors – SEC, BSP, CC, OIC; solvency and
compliance of institutions with laws and regulations