Retention For IT
Retention For IT
LITERATURE REVIEW
This project was researched and written to fulfill the specific research request of a single member of the Corporate Leadership
Council and as a result may not satisfy the information needs of other members. In its short answer research, the Corporate
Leadership Council refrains from endorsing or recommending a particular product, service or program in any respect. Sources
are contacted at random within the parameters set by the requesting member, and the resulting sample is rarely of statistically
significant size. That said, it is the goal of the Corporate Leadership Council to provide a balanced review of the study topic
within the parameters of this project. The Corporate Leadership Council encourages members who have additional questions
about this topic to assign custom research projects of their own design.
600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: 202-672-5600 FAX: 202-672-5700
A Seller’s Market 3
With demand up and supply down, IT professionals are a scarce asset…and they know it.
Council staff has reviewed published literature and past Advisory Board research in an attempt to
synthesize the specific strategies employed by companies to retain information technology (IT)
professionals. In some instances, Council staff developed hypothetical models to illustrate further the
proposed concepts. This research brief contains footnotes to guide the reader to the relevant articles that
provide further descriptions of the individual tactics presented herein.
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 3
STATE OF THE UNION: THE IT LABOR MARKET
FEBRUARY 1998
A Seller’s Market
With the growth of electronic commerce, the rise of the Internet, the threat of Year 2000 systems problems and the
demand for computerized applications, information technology now more than ever represents a critical component
of business survival. In order to offer increasingly technology-based products and services to their customers,
companies are scrambling to recruit and retain the individuals that will support such services: information technology
professionals.
While the demand for such talent is increasing, the supply is not. The following statistics indicate that the IT talent
pool is not meeting the needs of the market demand.
400,000 IT positions remain open worldwide1(19,000 within the United States2 alone)
Job openings and replacements in the US will demand 95,000 new IT workers annually until 20053
Only seven candidates exist for every 10 open IT positions4
Turnover rates for IT professionals have doubled, from 10 to 20 percent annually, since 1995.5
Results:
Cisco’s techniques have been very successful due to the quantities of people that they have been able to reach through
the internet. Cisco’s job’s page records as many as 500,000 accesses per month. In addition, the electronic city guide
that Cisco used on the night of the Super Bowl registered 2.5 million hits per day.
O’Brien, Chris. “Firms Scramble for Tech Workers” The News and Observer
(April 1997): A1.
Brichard, Bill. “Hire Great People Fast.” http://www.fastcompany.com/10/hire.html
(12 Nov 97).
In order to combat extensive recruiting efforts as well as aggressive “poaching” practices, companies must now focus
upon retention strategies to prevent the loss of key IT staff. Retention strategies may work in conjunction with
recruiting strategies, but companies must realize that although recruiting strategies may be successful in bringing IT
staff into a corporation, recruiting tactics are not successful tools for preventing IT staff from leaving.
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 5
STATE OF THE UNION: THE IT LABOR MARKET
FEBRUARY 1998
In light of current downsizing trends and cost-cutting measures, corporate executives are learning that replacing
information technology professionals is no small task, financially or logistically. Information technology employees
realize that they are in high-demand and frequently disregard employee loyalty issues. Companies complain that
“employees can be lured away these days with promises of state-of-the-art equipment, idyllic surroundings, even
large cash incentives to sign on for entry-level positions.”9 The estimated cost of replacing a senior database analyst
who earns approximately $60,000 a year is detailed below.10
Recruiting: $4,400
Search Firm: $5,000
+ Lost value created
due to inefficiencies
+ Training: $4,200
Lost Salary: $3,360
+ = $38,000+
(1 month’s salary) of departing and
incoming employees
Lost Created
Value: $5,040
$$$?
Initial reaction to improve IT staff retention focused upon two primary tactics: increased base salary and “pay back”
agreements. However, these practices may in fact be compounding the retention problem. According to a
Computerworld survey, a majority of the 200 respondents claim that base salaries are not as important as other
factors in their decisions.11
Corporations are also confronted with high turnover rates after providing IT employees with expensive educational
training or IT certification. Technical employees who complete degree programs or added coursework in their fields
are more marketable to outside companies. Some companies have taken measures to protect themselves from this
phenomenon by instituting “pay back agreements.” For example, Prudential Insurance Company of America
employees must sign a contract to stay on for at least a year or pay back a $10,000 training bill. The payback
agreement decreases to 50% of costs after one year.12
However, stay-on contracts or pay back agreements may do “I’ve heard of this kind of policy from time to time.
more harm than good. According to five IT professionals It clearly sends a signal to the employees that
surveyed in the article, these agreements reduce employees’ management does not trust them. Bad idea.”
loyalty to their organizations.13
Robert R. Dickson, Data Administrator
Family Restaurants, Inc., Irvine, CA
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 6
STATE OF THE UNION: THE IT LABOR MARKET
FEBRUARY 1998
While increased base salaries and pay back agreements served as “knee-jerk” reactions to retention attempts, they do
not effectively address factors that IT professionals value in an employment opportunity. By concentrating efforts on
factors desired by IT staff members, companies can implement retention tactics that are more attractive—and
ultimately more effective—than previous attempts.
Computerworld’s 1997 survey highlights the primary reasons that IT employees reject or accept job offers; these
factors are presented below in order of importance.
1. Quality of boss
2. Technology direction of IT department
3. Ability to use new technology
4. Job security*
4. Faith in financial stability of company*
6. More challenging assignments
7. Geographic location
8. Decision-making responsibility and authority*
8. Quality of IS peers*
8. Access to resources and funding needed to satisfy goals*
BIBLIOGRAPHY
11. Quality of top IS leadership
12. Base salary*
7-Recruiting and Retaining IT Employees
12. Ability to influenceNovember
the success of the IS department*
1997
*Indicates a tie.
PR Newswire, February 26, 1997
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 7
FEBRUARY 1998
Practicing Companies: Cigna Corporation, Sapient Corporation, Sears Roebuck & Company, Texas
Instruments, Xerox
Profile of Tactic: Through the use of stock options, profit-sharing programs and performance-
based bonuses, companies allow IT employees to reap the benefits of overall
business success in addition to compensation traditionally provided by base
salaries. Tying rewards to business success also aligns employees more closely
with overall business goals; when combined with effective communication of
company strategy and performance this strategy, can help to establish a greater
sense of commitment to and interest in the company.
Sample Handcuffs:
Stock options: Stock options prove a valuable component of the rewards package as they allow
companies to provide near-term incentives without spending inordinate sums of
cash. The popularity of this tactic is confirmed by a 1997 Coopers &Lybrand
survey which found that a majority of 667 software firms use stock options to
reward technical professionals.14
Performance-Based Bonuses: Companies may link bonuses to monthly, annual or project milestones.
Profit Sharing:
Profile of Tactic: Through the reward and/or recognition of patent applications and journal
publications, companies enhance an environment focused upon constant
innovation and individual achievement. Further, employees receive a level of
individual recognition often obscured in team-oriented corporate environments.
Sample Rewards:
Practicing Company: The models outlined below are based upon information gathered from an
information technology company with fewer than 7,500 employees and less than
$2 billion in revenue
Profile of Tactic: Programs highlight the intellectual endeavors of technical or other professional
employees and focus attention on individual achievement, providing continuous
opportunities for the transfer of information and the development of intellectual
capital.
Possible Selection Criteria: 1. Managers nominate employees who meet agreed-upon selection criteria
9 Overall performance
excellence 2. Management team, or group of senior-level executives, select 10 finalists
9 Singular outstanding from all nominated employees
achievement, including
substantial cost savings 3. Fellows are announced to company through the following vehicles:
or development of new Company-wide or division-wide meeting
product
9 Tenure with firm
Corporate newsletters
9 Number of years Postings on company intranet, and/or Internet sites
experience in field
9 Recognition by external 4. Fellows eligible to receive:
professional association Change in title
¶ Database creation
1. Company selects technical experts or senior executives to
teach a seminar class in their area of expertise. ¶ Advanced network
management
¶ Data mining strategies
2. Sessions typically last for 3 to 4 hours, but may last in excess
¶ Infrastructure architecture
of a full business day.
¶ Protecting intellectual
property
3. Company provides instructors with dedicated period of time
and all necessary materials and technology for developing ¶ The future of
course and support materials. telecommunications
technology
4. Description of course with a biography of the instructor is
posted on the company’s internet; this serves both to
advertise class availability and to recognize the instructor.
Care should be taken to design the biography in a way that
highlights skills of instructor and significant accomplishments
during their tenure.
Profile of Tactic: Structured, parallel paths that offer advancement to IT employees in both
managerial positions as well as technology positions. Paths are comparable in
terms of responsibility, rewards and influence extends to the senior levels of the
organization.
; Allows vertical and lateral movement ; Employee confusion regarding purpose of dual
among paths structure
; Clearly defines paths ; Poorly-defined paths
; Customized to the technical needs of the ; Relaxed selection criteria for technical track
company ; Management track perceived to be more
; Stretches to the company’s highest levels rewarding and desirable
; Applies the same standards and expectations ; Inequality between paths in the following areas:
along both paths, such as: Compensation
Compensation Decision-making authority
Decision-making authority Influence/credibility
Influence/credibility Responsibility
Responsibility Salary and incentives
Salary and incentives Status
Status
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 14
FEBRUARY 1998
Practicing Companies: “Ulysses Company” (Software development company that employs 11,000 and
generates more than $2 billion in annual revenue.)23
Profile of Tactic: A career path for software Executive Suite at Ulysses Integrates Seven Top
engineers to the chairman’s office, Star Tracks is a practical Software Engineers in the Firm’s Governance
example of dual career ladder strategy. Practice based on need
to leverage growing contingent of knowledge workers upon
whom businesses increasingly rely. C h airman 's O ffice
Chairman creates elite “Sponsor’s Council” at executive vice
president level for seven top software engineers/sponsors in
company. Once established at the senior-most levels of the S ponsor's C ouncil CEO
company, individual contributors provide counsel relative to
their own areas of expertise to executives exploring new
business opportunities. E x ecu tive V P E x ecu tive V P
D evelo p m en t M ark etin g
Four-stage “sponsor” track ties Sponsor Maintains network across and beyond company to stimulate,
different levels of technical leverage great ideas
mastery with appropriate levels Forms political alliances to promote new ideas, challenge status
of business contribution. quo, change strategic direction of company
Knowledge workers allowed to Plays active role in industry, professional associations,
concentrate on making technical government advisory committees
contributions without the
‘distraction’ of management Coordinator Provides project supervision to contributors
responsibilities. and Coach Serves as interface between hierarchical management,
professional track contributors
Ulysses reports 100 percent Begins working closely, maintaining relationships with people
retention rate at the track’s top outside company, suppliers, customers
level across the first five years of
its implementation, with less Contributor Independently carries out definable projects with pre-specified
than 10 percent annual turnover outcomes
down through the “apprentice Works across horizontal organization rotating among different
level.” process groups, units
Profile of Tactic: Career management courses and workshops designed to provide employees with
the means to plan their career paths.24 Allows employees the autonomy to take
ownership of their career development and progress, a distinctly different
technique than traditional company-coordinated employee development
strategies.
Duration & Eligibility—Two-day seminar is optional for employees, but required for
all management-level staff members.
Profile of Tactic: Companies that encourage their employees to pursue challenging projects of
their own design reduce the risk of boredom and burnout in their key value
creators.
Respect for technical skills IT professionals prefer mutual trust and participatory management from their
means little supervisors, according to interviewed individuals:28
“over-your-shoulder”
supervisory techniques or “I have complete freedom to work on any project I feel needs attention. From
consistent priority shuffling the time I started nine years ago, I have worked for supervisors who understand
that some people don’t need looking after. Right up through the short chain of
command, Saphikon has given people freedom to be creative.”
—Earle Rich, Engineer, Saphikon Inc.
“[I]f your business strategy requires you to be changing focus all the time, that
can be a real demotivator. If one week your project is seen as the hottest in the
world and then the company cancels it the next week, that doesn’t fly.”
—Bob Witte, Business Team Manager, Hewlett-Packard
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 17
FEBRUARY 1998
Practicing Companies: “Cedar Company”29 (Information technology company that employs 5,200
people and generates $850 million in annual revenue)
Profile of Tactic: In the model of cafeteria-benefits, accounts represent reserves of time and money
provided by the organization that IT employees may use for classes,
certification, internships or other educational experiences of their choice.
From the employer perspective, learning accounts constitute—beyond the
paycheck—a recruiting/retention lever. From the employee perspective, learning
accounts promote skill development and future employability.
Because IT professionals place high value upon staying marketable across time,
the opportunity to learn new skills is highly attractive. Individual learning
accounts strongly recommended for individuals in positions in which:
; Rapid skill obsolescence is a major concern
; Retention is crucial to business competitiveness
Sample Individual Learning Account Process:
January
$ February
March
ILA
Contract:
Profile of Tactic: Corporate headquarters invites innovation through the ranks by “bankrolling”
and supporting employees’ ideas for new products or market opportunities.
Organizations with state-of-the-art research and development functions allow IT
professionals to pursue new ventures, while insulating them from the risks
associated with such projects if those employees attempted on their own.31
$
$
Product
Champion
$50,000 $ $ $125,000 Product
$100,000 Champion
$75,000
Product Product
Champion Champion
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 19
FEBRUARY 1998
Practicing Companies: Apple Computers, Silicon Graphics, Intel, Tandem Computers, Xerox
Profile of Tactic: A paid or unpaid leave of absence with full benefits and a job guarantee.32 For
IT professionals, an abridged eligibility period of generally less than five years
translates into absences of between six and twelve weeks. With disability costs
related to stress estimated at $75 billion annually in the United States alone33,
companies tend to offer sabbaticals as "burnout prevention.”34
Sabbaticals are a good alternative for companies that do not have extensive in-
house educational and development alternatives, yet need to retrain their IT
professionals to combat the skill obsolescence spurred by rapid technical
innovation.35 According to Hewitt Research Group, the primary reasons for
offering sabbaticals include the following.
600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: 202-672-5600 FAX: 202-672-5700
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alexander, Steve. “The Best of the Best: Sears, Roebuck and Company.” Computerworld,
Date unknown: 18 (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Austin, Nancy K. “Why Sabbaticals Make Sense.” Working Woman, March 1994, 19+.
Author unknown. “Computer Survey Reveals that Good Training, Good Boss Retain In-Demand
Information Technology Personnel.” PR Newswire, 6 February 1997: page unknown
(Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Author unknown. “Salary Incentives Alone No Longer Enough to Recruit, Keep Software Employees.”
Software Industry Report, 21 July 1997: 1
(Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Author unknown. “Turnover Soars in Information Technology Field,” EIU ViewsWire, 12 June 1997:
page unknown.
Bachler, Christopher J. “Workers Take Leave of Job Stress.” Personnel Journal, January 1995, 38+.
Baker, Stephen. “The Global Search for Brainpower.” Business Week, 4 August 1997: 46
(Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Bellinger, Bill. “Shortage Spurs Meeting.” Electronic Engineering Times, 23 June 1997
(Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Corporate Leadership Council. Forced Outside: Leadership Talent Sourcing and Retention.
Washington: The Advisory Board Company, (1998): 85-109.
Corporate Leadership Council. “Tactic #3: Individual Learning Accounts.” Compelling Careers:
Workforce Management Structures of the New “Employers of Choice,” (1996): 55+
Corporate Leadership Council. “Practice #2: Non-Managerial ‘Star Tracks’.” Perfecting the Labor
Market, Washington: The Advisory Board Company, 39+.
Caudron, Shari. “Motivating Creative Employees Calls for New Strategies.” Personnel Journal
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
FEBRUARY 1998
Deloitte & Touche. “Leading Trends in Information Service (1995)” quoted in Cafasso, Rosemary.
“Satisfaction Guaranteed.” Computerworld, 20 November 1995, and Ettore, Barbara.
“How are Companies Keeping the Employees They Want?” American Management Association
Management Review (May 1997) (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier
Inc.).
Fillon, Mike. “Skills Retention Tension: How to Keep Your Star Staffers?” Client/Server Computing
(January 1997): 82 (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Gaw, Jonathan. “Perks and Pay are Keys in Staffing the Digital Age.” Star Tribune (Minneapolis),
12 January 1998, 1D (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Greco, Susan. “Unusual Incentives Help Boost Engineers’ Motivation.” EDN, 28 June 1990: 111
(Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Harrison, Lee Hecht. Survey ’97: Are You Using Technology to Recruit?
http://www.careerlhh.com/hrama97.html.
Higginbotham, Julie S. “1997 Career Satisfaction & Salary Survey.” R&D Magazine (September 1997):
R-V (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
King, Julia and Robert L. Scheier. “Want Training…Just Sign Here…” Computerworld,
24 February 1997: 89 (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Ladendorf, Kirk. “Patents on Upswing: Austin Inventors Led Texas in ’96 Registering.”
The Austin American-Statesman, 13 January 1997.
Levering, Robert and Milton Moskowitz. “The 100 Best Companies to Work For In America.” Fortune,
12 January 1998, 84+ (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Lissy, William E. “Currents in Compensation and Benefits.” Compensation & Benefits Review,
January-February 1993, 3 (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
FEBRUARY 1998
Messina, Judith. “Firms Boost Tech Pay in Heated Effort to Foil Rivals’ Search Engine.”
Crain’s New York Business, 14 July 1997: 17
(Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Roberts, “Wooing Wizards: Recruiting and Retaining Software Engineers.” PC Week, 30 October 1995:
A1 (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Rosa, Jerry. “VAR Shows How Common Sense Can Help Good Employees.” Computer Reseller News,
7 October 1996: 47+ (Obtained through LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.).
Working Council for Chief Information Officers. Stemming the Flight of IT Talent. Washington:
The Advisory Board Company (September 1997).
CORPORATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: 202-672-5600 FAX: 202-672-5700
END NOTES
1
Stephen Baker, “The Global Search for Brainpower,” Business Week 4 August 1997: 46.
2
Bill Bellinger, “Shortage Spurs Meeting,” Electronic Engineering Times, 23 June 1997.
3Jonathan Gaw, “Perks and Pay are Keys in Staffing the Digital Age.” Star Tribune (Minneapolis), 12 January
1998, 1D.
4 Judith Messina, “Firms Boost Tech Pay In Heated Effort to Foil Rivals’ Search Engine,” Crain’s New York
Business 14 July 1997: 17.
5 Author unknown, “Turnover Soars in Information Technology Field,” EIU ViewsWire 12 June 1997: page
unknown.
6
Lee Hecht Harrison, Survey ’97: Are You Using Technology to Recruit?
http.//www.careerlhh.com/hr_ama97.html
7
JS Lakinder Vohra, “Online Recruiting Fills Positions,” Denver Business Journal, 9 August 1996 :27A.
8
Corporate Leadership Council, Forced Outside: Leadership Talent Sourcing and Retention (1998): 85-109.
9
Charlene Marmer Solomon, “Keep Them!,” Workforce (August 1997): 48.
10
Working Council for Chief Information Officers, Stemming the Flight of IT Talent (September 1997).
11
Author unknown, “Computer Survey Reveals that Good Training, Good Boss, Retain In-Demand Information
Technology Personnel,” PR Newswire 6 February 1997: page unknown.
12
Julia King and Robert L. Scheier, “Want Training? Just Sign Here…” Computerworld 10 March 1997: 1.
13
Dana Crenshaw, “Breach of Faith,” Computerworld 24 February 1997: p. 89.
14
Author Unknown, “Salary Incentives Alone No Longer Enough to Recruit, Keep Top Software Employees,”
Software Industry Report 21 July 1997: 1.
15
Robert Ristelhueber, “What’s Behind Management Pay?,” Electronic Business Today (December 1995): 42.
16
Steve Alexander, “The Best of the Best: Sears, Roebuck and Company,” Computerworld: 18.
17
Alan R. Earls, “Retention Getters,” Computerworld 9 February 1998. 82.
18
Shari Caudron, “Motivating Creative Employees Calls for New Strategies,” Personnel Journal (May 1994).
19
Susan Greco, “Unusual Incentives Help Boost Engineers’ Motivation,” EDN, 28 June 1990: 111.
20
Ibid.
21
Shari Caudron, “Motivating Creative Employees Calls for New Strategies,” Personnel Journal (May 1994).
22
William E. Lissy, “Currents in Compensation and Benefits,” Compensation & Benefits Review January-
February 1993: 9.
23
Corporate Leadership Council, “Practice #2: Non-Managerial ‘Star Tracks’.” Perfecting the Labor Market
Washington: The Advisory Board Company, 39+.
24
Bill Roberts, “Wooing Wizards, Recruiting and Retaining Software Engineers,” PC Week, 30 October 30 1995:
A1.
25
Ibid.
26
Robert Levering and Milton Moskowitz, “The 100 Best Companies To Work For In America,” Fortune, 12
January 1998, 84+.
27
Julie S. Higginbotham, “1997 Career Satisfaction & Salary Survey,” R&D Magazine (September 1997): R.
BEYOND THE PAY RAISE: RETENTION TACTICS FOR IT PROFESSIONALS PAGE 2
ENDNOTES
FEBRUARY 1998
28
Ibid.
29
Corporate Leadership Council, “Tactic #3: Individual Learning Accounts,” Compelling Careers: Workforce
Management Structures of the New “Employers of Choice,” 1996, 55+
30
Ibid.
31
Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, “Rethinking Rewards for Technical Employees,” Organizational Dynamics March 22, 1
1990, 62+.
32
Nancy K. Austin, “Why Sabbaticals Make Sense,” Working Woman March 1994, 19+.
33
Christopher J. Bachler, “Workers Take Leave of Job Stress,” Personnel Journal January 1995, 38+.
34
Nancy K. Austin, “Why Sabbaticals Make Sense,” Working Woman March 1994, 19+.
35
Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, “Rethinking Rewards for Technical Employees,” Organizational Dynamics March 22,
1990, 62+.
36
Christopher J. Bachler, “Workers Take Leave of Job Stress,” Personnel Journal January 1995, 38+.