Scribd
Upload
179 views

Prefrac Injection Tests

The document discusses pre-fracture injection tests (DFITs) which are used to characterize low permeability reservoirs. DFITs involve injecting a small volume of fluid into the formation and monitoring pressure over an extended shut-in period. This allows determining key parameters like reservoir pressure, permeability, and closure pressure. The analysis of pressure derivatives over time can indicate the type of fluid leak-off occurring and fracture geometry changes, helping optimize hydraulic fracturing treatment design for the reservoir. DFITs provide a cost-effective means of obtaining critical data needed to stimulate low permeability formations successfully.

Uploaded by

Anshul Jha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
179 views

Prefrac Injection Tests

The document discusses pre-fracture injection tests (DFITs) which are used to characterize low permeability reservoirs. DFITs involve injecting a small volume of fluid into the formation and monitoring pressure over an extended shut-in period. This allows determining key parameters like reservoir pressure, permeability, and closure pressure. The analysis of pressure derivatives over time can indicate the type of fluid leak-off occurring and fracture geometry changes, helping optimize hydraulic fracturing treatment design for the reservoir. DFITs provide a cost-effective means of obtaining critical data needed to stimulate low permeability formations successfully.

Uploaded by

Anshul Jha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Prefrac Injection Tests – Why, How, What?

Mark Machala
Team Lead-Unconventionals
Global Technical Solutions
Testing in Low Permeability Reservoirs

 Due to the low permeability; reaching


pseudo-radial flow takes a long time
 Low permeability reservoirs are very
sensitive to damage. Making these difficult
to test, especially if the well is not flowing.
 Alternatives do exist that allow testing of
these wells.
– Measure Reservoir Pressure and Permeability
– Measure operational variables that affect the
hydraulic fracture design; which will ultimately
affect the productivity of the well
 DFIT, FET (Minifrac), Step Rate.

Table from Tight Gas Sands, by Holditch S.A.


Testing in Low Permeability Reservoirs (cont.)

Test Type Benefits


 Diagnostic Fluid Injection Test (DFIT)/  Determine Reservoir Pressure and Permeability
Falloff Test  Determine Formation Breakdown Pressure
– Small perforation interval  Estimate Closure-Stress
– Small volume Injected in the formation
– Less than 24 hrs shut-in should be
enough to complete test

 FET (aka Minifrac)  Determine Closure Stress


– Small treatment pumped before main  Fluid Leakoff
treatment
 Fluid Efficiency
– Utilizes the same fluid type, and rate as
 Fracture Gradient
the main treatment
 Fracture Height (if temperature log is used)
– Well is shut-in before main treatment

 Step Rate Test


 Determine Near Wellbore friction (Perf or
– Fluid is pumped into he formation at Tortuosity)
different rates
 Fracture Extension Pressure
– Rates are held for a specific amount of
time  Communication between the well and the
reservoir
What is a DFIT?

 A Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (a.k.a. G-function


test) is a small volume, low rate injection followed by an
extended shut-in period.

 It is a relatively inexpensive method used to determine


critical design parameters to optimize well completions
in low permeability sands.
– Pore pressure
– Permeability to Mobile Reservoir Fluid
– Closure pressure estimate and leakoff type
Why is permeability important?

 Primary influence in fracture models


(FRACPRO, GOHFER)
 Necessary for reservoir simulations
 Used in predicting well performance
 Affects economic calculations
Methods for Estimating Permeability
 Core Analysis
– Expensive, sample size limitations, high variability
 Pressure Transient Testing (Formation testers, DST)
– Time consuming
 Production History Matching
– Non-unique solution
 MRIL
– Needs data for correlation; Only run open hole;
Temperature limitations
 DFIT
– Inexpensive and expeditious
DFIT Key Assumptions

 Homogeneous Reservoir

 Constant Fracture Area During Closure

 Constant Permeable Area During


Closure
How is a DFIT Performed?
 Test zone is shot with minimal perf length
 Injection rate established at ~3-7 bpm
 Rate maintained constant for 1000-2000 gal with 2%-
7% KCL water
 Pressure is monitored for 4-24 hours (or more)
 Pressure should be recorded at 1 sec intervals using
an Electronic Memory Recorder (EMR)
– EMR can be run BH or Surface (SPIDR Gauge)
G Function Derivative Analysis
G Function Derivative Analysis

 Normal Leakoff
– Constant Fracture Area
– Homogeneous Rock Matrix
– Constant derivative line
– Super G is a straight line through the origin
– Closure when Super G deviates down from straight
line
G Function Derivative Analysis
G Function Derivative Analysis

 Pressure Dependent Leak-Off


– Fractures/Fissures are opened during injection
– Variable Leakoff during closure and may indicate dual porosity
reservoir
– Characteristic hump in Super G above the extrapolated straight
line
– Fissure Opening Pressure is where the hump meets the
extrapolated straight line
– Usually a period of normal leakoff observed before fracture
closure
– Closure when Super G deviates down from straight line
G Function Derivative Analysis
G Function Derivative Analysis

 Fracture Height Recession


– Fracture grows into surrounding higher stress layers
which close first
– Changing fracture area during leakoff
– Super G is below the straight line through the normal
leak-off data
– Concave down pressure curve
– Increasing Derivative
– Closure when Super G deviates down from straight
line
G Function Derivative Analysis
G Function Derivative Analysis

 Fracture Tip Extension


– Fracture continues to grow after shut-in
– Changing fracture area during leakoff
– Super G data extrapolates a straight line that
intersects above the origin
Conclusions
 Production response to stimulation can be unpredictable

 Stimulation costs can be a large percentage of well costs

 DFIT’s provide estimates of perm and reservoir pressure

 Analysis can estimate closure and identify leak-off behavior

 This information can be used to optimize treatment design

You might also like