100% found this document useful (1 vote)
434 views

Tutorial 1 Ans

The document discusses MOSFET modeling and contains example problems solving for effective density of states and ionization fractions. In the first problem, it is shown that the effective density of states represents the density of states in an energy strip 1.2kT wide near the conduction band edge. The second problem calculates the fraction of ionized donors and acceptors and determines the Fermi level position given ionization percentages. The third problem examines whether complete donor ionization can be assumed at different doping levels and temperatures.

Uploaded by

Ma Seenivasan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
434 views

Tutorial 1 Ans

The document discusses MOSFET modeling and contains example problems solving for effective density of states and ionization fractions. In the first problem, it is shown that the effective density of states represents the density of states in an energy strip 1.2kT wide near the conduction band edge. The second problem calculates the fraction of ionized donors and acceptors and determines the Fermi level position given ionization percentages. The third problem examines whether complete donor ionization can be assumed at different doping levels and temperatures.

Uploaded by

Ma Seenivasan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

ADVANCED MOSFET MODELING

Tutorial No:1

Q.1 Show that the effective density of states (N C) represents the density of
states in a strip 1.2 kT wide near the edge of the conduction band.
3 EC + ∆ E ( EC + ∆ E )
 2π kTme*  2

Ans : NC = = ∫ = ∫ (2 me* ) 2 ( E − Ec ) 2 dE
3 1
2 ÷ g ( E ) dE
 h
2
 EC EC
h3

( Ec + ∆ E )
( EC + ∆ E )
4π  ( E − Ec ) 
3
4π 2

= ∫ =
3
( E − Ec )
3 1
(2 me* ) 2 2
dE (2me* ) 2  
h3 EC h3 
3
2  Ec

4π 2
= × (2 me* ) 2 × ( ∆E ) 2
3
×
3

h3 3

3
2  ∆E  2 3
Thus, = × (∆E) 2 Or,
3
2 (π kT ) 4π ×  ÷ =
3
2

3  π kT  4π

2
 3  3
Therefore, ∆E =  ÷ π kT
 4π 
=1.2kT
[Message : Only states which are very close to E C in the conduction band will be
occupied. Similarly holes will only occupy states very close to the top of valence
band]

Q:2 In a semiconductor sample, donor and acceptor levels are 0.3eV apart
from each other. If 80% of the acceptors are ionized at 300K, evaluate the
fraction of ionized donors. If the donor level is 2kT below the conduction band
edge, determine the position of Fermi level.
Ans:

1
ηA =  EA − EF 
1 + 2 exp  ÷
= 0.8
 kT 

 1 
 ÷−1
Or,  E A − EF   0.8 
exp  ÷=
= 0.125
 kT  2

(EA – EF ) = 0.026 ln (0.125) = - 0.054 eV


∴ (ED – EF) = (ED – EA) + (EA – EF) = 0.3 – 0.054 = 0.246 eV
1 1
× 100%
Therefore, ηD = ( E − ED )
1 + 2 exp F =  − 0.246 
1 + 2 exp  
= 99.99%
kT  0.026 

Position of Fermi level :


ED is 2kT = 0.052 eV below EC
∴ EC – EF = (EC – ED) + (ED – EF) = 0.052 + 0.246 = 0.298 eV

Q: 3 Silicon wafers are doped with (i) 1015 (ii) 1018 arsenic atoms / cm3. Show
whether the assumption of complete ionization is justified in each case at
temperatures of 100K and 300K. Arsenic introduces a donor level E D
0.049 eV below EC.

Ans: Eion = Ec – Ed = 0.049eV


ND1 = 1015 atoms / cm3
ND2 = 1018 atoms / cm3

(a) At T = 100 K
Since NC α T3/2, at 100 K, NC = 2.8 x 10
100 3 2
19
×(
300
)
= 5.3886 x 1018 / cm3
Also, kT = 0.026/3 = 0.008667eV
For ND1 = 1015 atoms / cm3
2 2
= x 100%
ηD1= 1+ 1+
8 N D1  E 
exp  ion ÷ 1+ 1+
8 x 1015  0.049 
exp  ÷
= 91.19 %
NC  kT  5.3886 x 1018  0.008667 

For ND2 = 1018 atoms / cm3


2
= x 100%
ηD2 1+ 1+
8 x 1018  0.049 
exp  ÷
= 9.26%
5.3886 x 1018  0.008667 

(b) At T = 300K, For ND1 = 1015 atoms / cm3

2 2
= x 100%
ηD1 = 1+ 1+
8 N D1  E 
exp  ion ÷ 1+ 1+
8 x 10 15
 0.049 
exp  ÷
= 99.95%
NC  kT  2.8 x 1019  0.026 

For ND2 = 1018 atoms / cm3


2
= x 100%
ηD2 1+ 1+
8 x 10 18
 0.049 
exp  ÷
= 74.15%
2.8 x 1019  0.026 

[ Message : For lightly doped (~10 15 atoms / cm3) silicon, ionization is almost
complete at room temperature. However, for heavy doping (~1018 atoms / cm3), there
is only partial ionization at room temperature]

Q: 4 A silicon wafer is doped with 10 16 atoms /cm3 of Indium, which introduces


an accepter level EA 0.16eV above EV. Determine the temperature at which 50%
of Indium is ionized. If this wafer was doped with Boron instead of Indium, what
would have been the percentage of ionization at this temperature? For Boron, E A
– EV = 0.045 eV
2
(a) ηA = 1+ 1+
8N A  E 
exp  ion ÷
NV  kT 

For Indium, Eion = 0.16 eV

Taking NA = 1016 atoms / cm3 and NV = 1 x 1019 / cm3 (value at 300K) and ηA = 0.5,
we have

2
0.5 = 8 × 1016  0.16 
1+ 1+
8 × 1016  0.16 
exp  ÷
Or, 1+
1 × 1019
exp 
 kT 
÷ =3
1 × 1019  kT 

 0.16  ( 0.16 ) = 0.02316


Or, exp 
 kT 
÷ = 10
3
Or, kT =
ln (103 )
0.02316
Therefore, T = 8.667 × 10 − 5
= 267 K

(b) For Boron, Eion = 0.045 eV, T = 267 K, NA = 1016 /cm3, NV ≈ 1 × 1019 / cm3

2
× 100%
ηA = 1+ 1+
8 × 1016 
exp 
0.045 
÷
= 98.64%
−5
1 × 1019  8.667 × 10 × 267 

[ Message : Ionization is much less with increase in ionization energy]

NC N D  E 
Q.5 Assuming n = ND+, show that at very low temperature n=
2
exp  − ion ÷
 2 kT 
.
Hence show that is this temperature range, the Fermi level is an n-type
EC + E D kT  2NC 
semiconductor is given by EF =
2

2
ln 
 ND 
÷ .

Also find EF at 0K
 E − EF 
(a) n = N C exp  − C
 kT 
 (1)

1 1
ηD = ≈
 EF − ED 
1 + 2 exp 
 EF − E D 
÷ 2 exp  ÷
at very low temperatures
 kT   kT 

ND
∴ n = η D ND =
 E F − ED 
2 exp  ÷
(2)
 kT 

Multiplying (1) & (2)


NC N D  −( EC − E F ) − ( E F − E D )  NC N D  ( EC − ED ) 
n2 = exp   = exp − 
2  kT  2  kT 

NC N D  E 
Or, n=
2
exp  − ion ÷
 2 kT 

(b) Equating eqns. (1) & (2)


 E − EF  ND
N C exp  − C  =
 kT   EF − E D 
2 exp  ÷
 kT 

2 NC  − ( E F − ED ) −( EC − E F )  2 NC  E + ED − 2 E F 
Or, ND
= exp 
 kT

kT 
 Or, ND
= exp  C
 kT 

 E + ED  kT  2 NC 
∴ EF =  C ÷− ln  ÷
 2  2  ND 

(c)At T = 0K, second term becomes zero.


EC + ED
EF = 2 i.e., Fermi level lies in this middle of EC & ED.
Q : 6 At moderately high temperature, assuming ND+ = ND, show that
  2ni  
2
ND 
n=
2 
1+ 1+  ÷  Intrinsic temperature is defined as the temperature at
  ND  

which the instrinsic concentration ‘n i’ equals the doping concentration ‘N’.


Ti Eg
=
Show that the ratio Ti / To is given by To  NC NV  . Determine Ti for Si
2kT ln  ÷÷
 N
 

and Ge, assuming NC and NV to be independent of temperature because of the


logarithmic dependence [NC = 2.8 x 1019 / cm3, NV = 1 x 1019 / cm3 for Si, NC = 1 x
1019 / cm3 for Si, NC = 1 x 1019 / cm3, NV = 6 x 1018 / cm3 for Ge]
(N − N A− ) + (N − N A− ) + 4ni2
+ + 2

Ans (a) n=
D D

Taking N D+ = N D and N A− = 0

ND + + 4 ni2 ND  4ni2 
2 2
ND ND ND
n= = + + ni2 = 1 + 1+ 2 
2 2 4 2 
 ND 

  2ni  
2
ND 
Therefore n=
2 
1+ 1+  ÷ 
  ND  

(b) At T = Ti, N = ni
 − Eg  Eg
Or, N = ni = Nc Nv exp  ÷ Or, 2kTi
= ln ( Nc N v N )
 2kT 

Ti Eg
=
Therefore, To 2kTo ln Nc Nv N ( )
Eg
Ti =
(c) 2k ln ( N C NV N )
For Si, Eg = 1.1eV, Nc = 2.8 x 1019 / cm3, Nv = 1 x 1019 / cm3 and N = 1 x 1015 / cm3
1.1
Ti =
 2.8 × 1019 × 1019  = 653 K
2 × 8.667 × 10− 5 ln  ÷
 1015 ÷
 

For Ge, Eg = 0.67eV, Nc = 1 x 1019 / cm3, Nv = 6 x 1018 / cm3 and N = 1 x 1015 / cm3
0.67
Ti =
 1× 1019 × 6 × 1018  = 357 K
2 × 8.667 × 10 − 5 ln  ÷
 1015 ÷
 

[Message : The intrinsic temperature is higher for a wider bandgap semiconductor]

Q.7 Draw the energy band diagram of silicon doped with 10 15 arsenic
atoms/cm3 at 77K, 300K and 600K showing the Fermi level?

0.026
(a) At 77K, kT = 300
× 77 = 6.67 × 10 −3 eV

77 3 2
N C = 2.8 × 1019 × (
300
) = 3.64×1018/cm3
2 2
ηD = =
1+ 1+
8N D  E 
exp  ion ÷ 1+ 1+
8 × 1015  0.049 
exp  ÷
= 0.3226
NC  kT  3.64 × 1018  0.00667 

 E − EF 
n= ηD × N D = 3.226×1014/cm3 and n = N C exp  − C
 kT 

 NC   3.64 × 1018 
Therefore EC − E F = kT ln 
 n 
÷ = 0.00667 ln  14 ÷
 3.226 × 10 
= 0.0622eV

Or, EF – Ei = (EC – Ei) – (EC – EF) = 0.55 – 0.0622 = 0.4878 eV


(b) At 300K, kT = 0.026 eV, Nc = 2.8 x 1019 / cm3, ηD ≈ 1, or n ≈ ND = 1015/cm3
 NC   2.8 × 1019 
Therefore EC − EF = kT ln 
 n 
÷ = 0.026 ln 
 1015
÷ = 0.2662eV

Or, EF – Ei = (EC – Ei) – (EC – EF) = 0.55 – 0.2662 = 0.2838 eV


0.026
(c) At 600K, kT = 300
× 600 = 0.052 eV
600 3 2 600 3 2
N C = 2.8 × 1019 × (
300
)
= 7.92×1019/cm3, NV = 1019 × (
300
) = 2.828 ×1019 / cm3

 − Eg   −1.1 
ni = Nc Nv exp  ÷= 7.92 × 2.828 × 1019 exp  ÷ = 1.21× 10 / cm
15 3

 2kT   0.104 

  2ni   1015   2 × 1.21 × 1015  


2 2
ND  1 +
n= 1+ 1+  ÷ = 1+  ÷  = 1.81× 10 / cm
15 3

2   N D   2   10 15
 
 

 n   1.81 
Therefore EF − Ei = kT ln  ÷ = 0.052 ln 
 ni 
÷ = 0.021eV
 1.21 

[ Message : At very low temperature the Fermi level is close to the band edge. With
increase in temperature, the Fermi level moves towards the middle of the bandgap]

Q.8 A silicon wafer is doped with 2 x 1016 boron and 1016 phosphorus atoms/
cm3. Calculate n, p, EF at room temperature, assuming complete
ionization. Repeat the same for 8 x 1015 boron atoms / cm3?

(a) ND+ = 1016 / cm3 and NA- = 2 x 1016 / cm3

− + − + 2
(N A − N D ) + ( N A − N D ) 2 + 4 ni
p= ≈ (NA – ND) = 1 x 1016 / cm3
2

ni 2
(1.5 × 1010 ) 2
n= = (1 × 1016 ) = 2.25 x 104 / cm3
p
 p   1016 
EF = Ei − kT ln  ÷ = Ei − 0.026 ln  10 ÷
= Ei − 0.349eV
 ni   1.5 × 10 

(b) NA- = 8 x 1015 / cm3 and ND+ = 1016 / cm3


+ − + − 2
( ND − NA )+ ( N D − N A ) 2 + 4n i
n= ≈ (ND – NA) = 2 x 1015 / cm3
2

(1.5 × 1010 )
2
ni2
p= = = 1.125 × 105 / cm 3
n 2 × 1015

 n   2 × 1015 
EF = Ei + kT ln  ÷ = Ei + 0.026 ln  10 ÷
= Ei + 0.307eV
n
 i   1.5 × 10 

You might also like