A Long Term Faculty Development Plan

for the
University of San Agustin Basic Education Department
(Elementary)
2018-2022

1
 Introduction.

The university began as a preparatory school for boys during the American

colonial period. It was recognized by the government on December 12, 1912 for

its various course offerings. On February 5, 1917, it was formally incorporated

2
under the name Colegio de San Agustín de Iloilo. In 1928, one of the country's

oldest campus publications, The Augustinian Mirror, was established, producing

some of the country's well-known writers. The 1930s saw rapid growth with the

opening of three colleges in quick succession i.e. the College of Liberal Arts in

1935, the College of Commerce in 1936 and the College of Law in 1937. In

1940, on the eve of the Second World War, the college admitted female

students for the first time.

During the Second World War (1941–45), the college was temporarily shuttered

as the Philippines fought a guerilla war against the Japanese. The war led to the

destruction of all the buildings, except for the Urdaneta Hall, which at present

houses the university theatre and Archives and Museum. With almost the entire

college in ruins, some friars advocated closing the school altogether while others

pushed for its immediate rehabilitation. It was eventually reopened in 1945,

followed by a decade of expansion that ushered in both the College of Pharmacy

and the College of Technology (1945), the Normal (Teacher's) College (1947),

the Graduate School (1950), and the College of Dentistry (1953). The school

was granted university status on March 1, 1953, a year before its 50th

anniversary, making it the first university in Western Visayas.

The following year, Rev. Angel Dulanto, OSA arrived from Spain after

3
completing his studies at Villanova University, an American sister school of the

University of San Agustin. As an impresario, he introduced the yearly velada,

characterized by a weeklong festivity of artistic, religious, and cultural events. A

zarzuela, staged by both professors and students, is the centerpiece of

University Week from February 14–20.

In 1965 Rev. Nicanor Lana, OSA, Ph.D. became the rector of the

university. His term was marked by vast improvements in the school's

infrastructure. The same year he started his term as rector. He inaugurated

DySA, the official radio station of the university, to help expand the reach of the

university through mass media. The University of San Agustín Press, known

today as Libro Agustino, came a year later. In the months leading to the

centenary of San Agustín in 2004, it began publishing book titles by Augustinian

authors, with an eye at producing a total of 100 different volumes.

The university maintains a Level III accreditation status granted by the PAASCU

and is one of the two schools in the region having an autonomous status

granted by CHED. The university's campus, situated in the very heart of the city

on General Luna Street, has a modern gymnasium, an auditorium, various

conferences and seminar rooms, science, computer and speech laboratories, a

museum, a bookstore, a library, an instructional media center, and tennis and

badminton courts.

4
In the early 2000’s the University of San Agustin transferred its Basic Education

Department to the suburbs of Sambag Jaro in order to accommodate the rise in

student population both in the Colleges and the Basic Education level.

More than a hundred years after its establishment the University is continuously

pursuing its Mission and Vision, the goal of being a premier academic community

of life – long learners working with one mind and one heart to search for,

discover and share the Truth (Gaudium de Veritate) for the promotion of

Authentic human and societal development. As the Philippine education system

attempts to keep up with the pace of the modern world and the globalization of

learning begins to creep into the institutions increased teacher competency is

also necessary.

In the wave of 21st century learning the University of San Agustin should keep

its faculty at par with the qualifications of faculties from the major learning hubs

of Asia. New techniques in teaching must be explored above and beyond the

normal classroom discussion Experiential learning and critical thinking must be

proactively advocated by teachers who are masters in their fields.

5
Moreover there must be a consistent monitoring and assessment of teacher

performance in order to ensure that the skills of the teachers are within the

same realm of the students. Teachers must be encouraged to take part in

research publication and explore avenues of faculty development that will

enhance teacher competencies.

6
 Faculty Profile:

With the goal of faculty development in mind it is essential for the University to

take stock of the current faculty that it has in order to better determine the

course to take for its faculty development program. Classifying the current faulty

will allow the University to revisit internal and external programs and identify key

areas for improvement and enlist potential linkage partners.

Table 1. Faculty Profile of Elementary teachers of the Basic Education Department

Highest Educational Attainment Male Female

Ongoing Finished Ongoing Finished

Doctoral Degree 0 1 0

Masters Degree 2 5

Bachelor Degree with LET 0 4

Total: 2 10

7
Organizational Structure of the Basic Education Department:

School Principal

Academic Coordinator
Extra Co curricular coordinator

8
 Teachers

Brief Explanation:

1. The structure above represent the following key relationship in relation to

the faculty of the University in the Basic Education Department:

2. The Department is headed by the School Principal.

3. There are two other point persons who have a close collaborative

relationship with the principal- the Academic Coordinator and the Extra Co

Curricular coordinator.

4. There is also a close coordination between the Academic Coordinator and

the Extra Co-curricular coordinator.

5. These two point persons come from the same group of faculty with no extra

compensation.

6. The teachers are given extra responsibilities by two point persons who are

also their colleagues without extra compensation nor other form of reward.

9
 Vision and Mission with Strategy Formulation

Vision

The University of San Agustin Basic Education Department will be the premier

institution for a well developed learner by 2022 with faculty members deeply

rooted in the Augustinian values of Unitas, Caritas and Veritas.

Mission

The University of San Agustin Basic Education Department offers a curriculum

geared towards the total development of the learner in academics and real life

scenarios in line with the University’s core principle of Virtus et Sciencia.

Goals

1. Achieve academic excellence through the promotion of faculty morale.

2. Enhance teacher capability in their field of specialization by promoting

further studies.

3. Promote institutional excellence through research and development

10
 contribution by teachers.

4. Establishing and pursuing linkages with stakeholders.

To realize the Vision and Mission the following Key Result Areas were

formulated:

1. Enhance faculty morale and core competencies.

2. Improve student learning experience.

3. Foster linkages with stakeholders.

4. Produce students and faculty with a thirst for lifelong learning.

For Key Result Area 1, The Faculty is the backbone of the institution. This

means that the school will do well to invest in the competencies and morale of

the faculty by initiating programs that will show them that the University is there

to support them as they continue with their vocations.

Offering a scholarship for further studies is one of the programs initiated by the

University, however the required return is likened to bondage as opposed to

development thus leaving the faculty in a state of confusion as to whether or not

they will apply for the said scholarship.

The University should devise a way to enhance its offerings to make it more

attractive to the faculty which can include sponsorship to conventions that will

result to the development of the faculty. An echo seminar can be conducted to

ensure transmission of knowledge and boost faculty confidence. Currently, the

11
University is only shouldering a measly amount leaving the faculty at the mercy

of financial distress.

For Key Result Area 2, One of the end goals of the boosting faculty

competencies and morale is that in the long run, it will result to the

enhancement of the student learning experience. When a teacher does not go

beyond the traditional pedagogical approach learning becomes a one way street-

the teacher spews out information and the student tries to catch up. As

compared to a teacher who is well exposed to the latest pedagogical techniques

will more likely be able to enhance student learning experience. The 21st century

learners are on the hyper expressway of technology. Thus it means that the

teacher must keep up with the technological advances that can be utilized to

make sure that learning is not only purely textbook but is also experiential for

the students.

For Key Results Area 3, The University along with the Basic Education

Department believes firmly that the stakeholders participation is essential in the

development of the institution. A healthy relationship with the stakeholders is a

key to a vibrant implementation of school programs. Hence the Department

must see to it that it is able to establish communication and relationship with the

stakeholders. In light of the goal of faculty development, one way on how this

could be done is by projecting to the stakeholders the results that will be

achieved once the faculties core competencies and specialization is enhanced.

For Key Results Area 4, The University has always stressed the noble role of
12
research and development in institutional development. Aside from this, the

University has emphasized that true education is like a scaffolding in that when

one has reached a new area of learning such person will strive to learn further.

The University should always make available funds for teacher and student

partnerships to explore a new field of learning. School facilities should be open

and accessible with ease so that students and teachers alike will be encouraged

to pursue higher learning. By doing so, the Department will be producing

research proficient learners and research proficient teachers.

Key Results Area

Long Term Faculty Development Plan for the Basic Education Department
(Elementary Level)

Goal 1: Achieve academic excellence through the promotion of faculty morale.

Objectives Programs Project Implementing Desired

Strategy Outcome

To enhance Morale “Teacher ko Every three This program

academic enhancement Idol Ko” months there will highlight
excellence Program will be teacher
through collected from qualities that
promotion of three different so many
faculty morale stakeholders people today
selected by an have seemed
ad hoc to have
committee at forgotten. It
random, will be a
comments and reminder for
nomination the students,
forms for the parents
teachers in the and other
Basic Education stakeholders
Department. that teaching is

13
 a noble
The form will profession and
seek to elicit teachers are in
comments a vocation of
which a the service to
stakeholders others.
has
experienced in Linkages will
dealing with be established
the teacher. on a multi-
facet
Deliberation perspective
will be from the
conducted by parents, from
the ad hoc fellow
committee and teachers, from
the result will students and
be posted at from
the school community.
bulletin board.

To arrange Quality Pang Abi-Abi The University Training

peer to peer improvement lecture seminar need not look measures to
involvement program series far in order to allow
and team find resource knowledge
seminars on speaker. There transfer and
various areas are a lot of will boost
of the teachers both morale.
profession within the
Basic Education
Department At the end of
and the every training
University that session the
have been teacher is
through expected to
training have learnings
seminars either that will allow
by their them to
personal become better
spending or by teachers.
school
sponsorship.
Learning
The Pang Abi together will
Abi Lecture also enhance

14
 Series will teacher bond
serve as a
venue to
knowledge
transfer and
quality
enhancement.
It will also
boost teacher
morale by
giving them an
altruistic
feeling of
contributing to
the betterment
of the
institution.

Goal 2: Enhance teacher capability in their field of specialization by promoting

further studies

Objectives Programs Project Implementing Desired

Strategy Outcome

To nurture Continuing USA: The USA Submitted

teachers’ Professional Understanding project aims to entries will be
professional Development revisit best subjected to
Strategic
development practices in the testing for two
Program Actions
through delivery of quarters and
collaborative instruction by the results will
research holding be compared
studies and pedagogical with the
pedagogical design contest traditional
contests and within the teaching
curriculum Department. strategies.
developments

The goal is to The

allow the pedagogical

15
 teachers to study which
think outside will yield the
the box and highest
use as areas improvement
for further will be
research and integrated as a
practice teaching
already existing strategy in the
teaching following
strategies. school year.

Teachers who
wish to attend
Teachers who
key seminars
have been
that focus on:
given the
curriculum
opportunity to
development,
attend the
teaching
To enhance seminar should
strategies and
professional have a
research shall
development different
be given a
by requiring standard of
chance to do
teachers to performance
so with the
attend key evaluation.
University
seminars and S.I.L “Seminar defraying 50%
conferences and Integrative of the cost.
and to require Learning”
teachers who Program The teacher
have attended attendees will
a seminar be required to
output for submit a
purposes of narrative
echo seminars report and
prepare an
echo seminar
to be held on
the closest
Saturday after
the end of the
seminar.

16
Goal 3: Promote institutional excellence through research and development
contribution by teachers.

Objectives Programs Projects Implementing Desired

Strategy outcome

To ensure Strengthening Research Teachers who Research will

institutional Institutional Publication are undergoing result to
excellence by Standards program further studies institutional
asking the will be asked to excellence.
teachers to contribute Making the
produce research University a
quality output that will center of
research. contribute to research
the institution's culture, and its
development. teachers as its
primary
research
The University assets.
has eight key
areas of
advocacy. The
research must
center on
either one of
the eight
University
advocacies and
it must be
actionable and
significant.

Goal 4: Establishing and pursuing linkages with stakeholders.

Objectives Programs Projects Implementing Desired

Strategy outcome

17
To create and Community Community Once every Proactive
enhance Development Day four months a relationship will
linkage community day be established
partnerships. will be held in between key
the University. stakeholders.

During the
community
day, various
stakeholders
will be updated
with the
projects of the
University.

Impact
assessment
and
feedbacking
will be taken
from the
stakeholders
to establish
better linkage.

The
stakeholders
will be given
the opportunity
to proactively
contribute to
the
development of
the institution
not necessarily
through cash.

18
Goal 1: Achieve academic excellence through the promotion of faculty morale.
Program: Morale Enhancement Program

Timeline Persons Needed Persons Budget Success

2018-2022 Needed resources Involved Indicators

Activity: Teacher ko, Idol Ko

Tasks:

1. Create
Principal
ad hoc Created
Every year Academic -0-
committe committee
Coordinator
e

2. Formulat 2018 only

ion of and Paper, Committee Nomination
3,000
nominati revisions Computer in charge tool
on tool every year

3. Releasin 2018 only

g of with Committee Approved
Paper 2,000
guideline revisions in charge guidelines
s every year

Distributed
4. Impleme Every three Printed
Committee nomination
nt months of nomination 100
in charge forms to key
Program every year forms
stakeholders

End of every Committee Tabulation

5. Assessm three Tabulation in charge and
-0-
ent months of sheets School assessment
every year principal of results

Results
6. Release After School
2,500 released for
of results deliberation principal
recognition.

Program: Quality Enhancement Program

Activity: Pang Abi Abi Lecture Series
Tasks:

1. Create
Academic Created
Steering Every year -0-
Coordinator committee
Committ

19
 ee

2. Committ
ee to
identify
Paper, Committee Lecture
lectures Every year -0-
Computer in charge Tracker
that can
be
offered.

3. Selection
of
lecture
resource
person Letter Committee Accepted
Every Year 2,000
from invitation in charge invitation
within
the
Universit
y

Venue,
AV
equipment,
4. Impleme Holding of
As snacks, Committee
nt 5,000 lecture
scheduled token for the in charge
Program series
resource
person

At the end Assessment

5.Assessmen Assessment Academic
of every -0- sheets and
t sheets coordinator
lecture action items

Goal 2:Enhance teacher capability in their field of specialization by promoting

further studies
Program: Continuing Professional Development Program

Task:

Timeline Persons Needed Persons Budget Success

Needed Resources Involved Indicators
2018-2022

20
1. Create Research Research -0- Created
steering Center Head Center steering
committee and auxiliary Head, committee
team
Academic
Coordinator,
school
principal

2. Committe Paper 1,000 Created

e to guidelines
formulate
guidelines

3. Committe Paper -0- Guidelines

e to release released
guidelines

4. Call for Once a year Paper -0- Papers

Best for every gathered
Practices year
proposal

5. Evaluatio End of every 1,500 Proposals

n by year are
research evaluated
head and
auxiliary
team with
deliberation

6. Selection Start of 2,500 Winning

and every school proposal
integration year after and its goal
evaluation and how-to
will be
explained by
the winner
in an
assembly of
teachers.

21
Activity: S.I.L “Seminar and Integrative Learning” Program

Task:

1. Designati Start of Excel Sheet Designated -0- Creation of

on of S.I.L. every school Head with S.I.L. Team
head year three
committee
members

2. Gathering Start of -0- Data base

of seminars every school for the
teachers are year seminars to
interested in be attended
attending

3. Rationale Upon Paper -0- Assessment

submission submission of seminar
and costing of seminar desired to
to be be
attended attended.

4. Submissio To be -0- Submitted

n of budget determined budget
request request for
the seminar.

5. Release To be -0- Budget

of budget determined release.

6. Post To be given 1,500 Submission

Seminar the of narrative
Narrative Saturday report and
Report and nearest to conduct of
Echo the end of echo
Seminar the seminar seminar.
preparation

22
Goal 3: Promote institutional excellence through research and development
contribution by teachers.
Program: Strengthening Institutional Standard

Activity:

Task:

Timeline Persons Needed Persons Budget Success

Needed Resources Involved Indicators
2018-2022

1.Creation Academic Academic -0- Created

of Steering Coordinator, Coordinator, Steering
Committee Research Committee
Research
Head
Head of the
University of
San Agustin

2. Steering Paper -0- Guidelines

Committee formulated
to formulate
guidelines
during 2018
only

3. Guideline Paper -0- Guidelines

s to be posted
released

4. Submissio Paper 10,000 Research

n of gathered by
Research the end of
the
academic
year

5. Committe 5,000 Published

e to publish research
research

23
6. Committe 20,000 Best Faculty
e to award research
20,000 cash award to be
incentive to given every
teacher with year during
the best the
research Personnel
Recognition

Goal 4: Establishing and pursuing linkages with stakeholders.

Program: Community Development

Activity: Community Day

Task:

Timeline Persons Needed Persons Budget Success

Needed Resources Involved Indicators
2018-2022

1. Every Extra co- paper Extra co- -0- Created

year a curricular curicular steering
steering coordinator coordinator committee
committee and team and key
with be stakeholders
formed to comprise
of the
program
team

2. Program paper -0- Outlined

proposal program
and
activities
proposal

3. Presentati -0- Proposal

on of Presented
proposal to

24
School
Principal for
approval

4. Implemen 15,000 Community

tation of Day being
Community held
Day once a
year every
third
Monday of
November

25
 Budget Matrix
Goal 1: Achieve academic excellence through the promotion of faculty morale.
Program: Morale Enhancement Program

Objective Tasks Budget Funding

Source
Teacher ko, Idol 1. Create ad hoc committee -0- University
Ko- To enhance Budget
academic 2. Formulation of nomination
excellence tool 3,000
through
promotion of 3. Releasing of guidelines 2,000
faculty morale
4. Implement Program 100

5. Assessment -0-

6. Release of results 2,500

26
Pang Abi Abi 1. Create Steering Committee -0- University
Lecture Seminar Budget
Series-To 2. Committee to identify lectures
arrange peer to that can be offered. -0-
peer
involvement and 3. Selection of lecture resource
team seminars person from within the 2,000
on various areas University
of the
profession 4. Implement Program 5,000

5.Assessment -0-

Goal 2: Enhance teacher capability in their field of specialization by promoting

further studies
Program: Continuing Professional Development Program
Objective Tasks Budget Funding
Source
Understandin 1. Create steering committee -0-
University
g Strategic Budget
Action- To
nurture 2. Committee to formulate 1,000
teachers’ guidelines
professional
development 3. Committee to release
through
guidelines
collaborative
research
studies and 4. Call for Best Practices proposal -0-
pedagogical
contests and
5. Evaluation by research head -0-
curriculum
and auxiliary team with
developments
deliberation

6. Selection and integration

1,500

27
 2,500

Seminar and 1. Designation of S.I.L. head -0-

University
Integrative Budget
Learning
Program- To 2. Gathering of seminars
enhance teachers are interested in
professional attending
development by -0-
requiring
3. Rationale submission and
teachers to
costing -0-
attend key
seminars and
conferences and 4. Submission of budget request
to require
teachers who -0-
5. Release of budget
have attended a
seminar output 50,000
for purposes of 6. Post Seminar Narrative Report
echo seminars and Echo Seminar preparation
1,500

Goal 3: Enhance teacher capability in their field of specialization by promoting

further studies
Program: Continuing Professional Development Program
Objective Tasks Budget Funding
Source
Strengthening University
Institutional 1. Creation of Steering -0- Budget
Standard- To Committee
ensure
institutional 2. Steering Committee to
excellence by -0-
formulate guidelines during
asking the
2018 only
teachers to
produce quality
research. 3. Guidelines to be released

-0-
4. Submission of Research

10,000
5. Committee to publish
research
5,000

6. Committee to award 20,000

28
 cash incentive to teacher 20,000
with the best research

Goal 4: Establishing and pursuing linkages with stakeholders.

Program: Community Development
Objective Tasks Budget Funding
Source
Community Day- 1.Every year a steering committee -0- Department
To create and with be formed Budget
enhance linkage 2. Program proposal and activities -0-
partnerships. proposal
3. Presentation of proposal to -0-
School Principal for approval
4. Implementation of Community 15,000
Day once a year every third
Monday of November

29
Budget Summary-Program Summary and Budget Source

Task 2018-2019 2019-2020 2021-2022 Funding Sources

Program 1: University Budget
Create ad hoc committee 0 0 0

Formulation of nomination tool 3000 3000 3000

Releasing of guidelines 2000 2000 2000

Implement Program 100 100 100

Assessment 0 0 0

Release of results 2,500 2,500 2,500

Program 2: University Budget
Create Steering Committee 0 0 0

Committee to identify 0 0 0
lectures that can be offered.

Selection of lecture 2,000 2,000 2,000

resource person
from within the University

Implement Program
5,000 5,000 5,000

Assessment 0 0 0

30
Program 3: University Budget
Create steering committee 0 0 0
1,000 1,000 1,000
Committee to formulate

guidelines 0 0 0

Committee to release 0 0 0
guidelines
1,500 1,500 1,500
Call for Best Practices

proposal
2,000 2,000 2,000
Evaluation by research head

and auxiliary team

with deliberation

Selection and integration

Program 4: University Budget

Designation of S.I.L. head 0 0 0
Gathering of seminars 0 0 0
teachers are interested in
attending
Rationale submission and 0 0 0
costing
Submission of budget request 0 0 0
Release of budget 50,000 70,000 80,000
Post Seminar Narrative Report 1,500 1,500 1,500
and Echo Seminar preparation
Program 5: Department
Budget
Every year a steering 0 0 0
committee with be formed
Program proposal and 0 0 0
activities proposal
Presentation of proposal to 0 0 0
School Principal for approval
Implementation of 15,000 20,000 25,000
Community Day once a year
every third Monday of
November
Program 6: University Budget
Creation of Steering 0 0 0
Committee
Steering Committee to 0 0 0
formulate guidelines
during 2018 only

31
Guidelines to be 0 0 0
released
Submission of Research 10,000 10,000 10,000
Committee to publish 5,000 5,000 5,000
research
Committee to award 20,000 20,000 20,000
best research
Sub Total 120,600 145,600 160,000
Expenditures:
Contingency (10%) 12,600 14,560 16,000
Total Amount: 133,200 160,160 176,000

Partnership and Linkages with External Environment

The University of San Agustin is in a challenging position owing to its complex

origins as the first University in Western Visayas and its hope to becoming a

32
premier institution for life-long learners. The harsh reality is that the University

cannot bank on being just the first university in Western Visayas. Both parents

and students alike expect more from an institution boasting of 100 years of

experience in education.

Undoubtedly, the University of San Agustin has produced notable alumni which

has recognized the University’s role in the their success prompting them to give

back to the University in the form of donations thru the Philanthropic Office of

the University. Notably alumni such as Henry Chusuey and Edgar Sia has gifted

the University with physical infrastructures to serve as lifelong learning hubs for

Augustinians. However, it is not only through the improvement of the physical

structures in which the University can benefit. A portion of alumni donations

should also be tapped as existing funding for teachers who are desirous of

pursuing higher education but do not have the monetary support to do so.

Subject to the strict requirement of having an academic paper published, or

sharing of innovative classroom techniques and other indicator, an institution

invested in the development of its human resources will be just as beneficial for

the University in attaining its goals.

Partnerships and Linkages with other Universities

Currently, the University of San Agustin College of Law has linked with the

33
University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Civil Law in order to offer Master’s degree

in Law to law professors employed by the University. This set up removes the

need of professors from San Agustin to to go Manila to avail of higher studies.

Using a similar model, linkages between the University of San Agustin Basic

Education Department and other Universities can result to the availability of post

graduate studies that are aligned with the Faculty’s undergraduate degree.

Partnership with Foreign Agencies and NGO’s

The University is in a unique position to take advantage of linkages with foreign

governments and NGO’s through its research and development office. Inter

country immersion programs for the faculty can serve as a venue for

development of the research agenda of the University. Currently, only

Departments dealing with the Sciences have the opportunity to be exposed to

international fora despite such exposure however the University only defrays

part of the expenses. This fact alone, already serves to discourage faculty from

participating in fora which can contribute to faculty development.

Partnership with internal stakeholders

Faculty development does not operate in a vacuum. It is essential to create an

efficient and effective feed backing process for internal stakeholders particularly

the parents.

34
35
 MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN

This institutional plan had developed six major programs which would respond

to the prevailing problems in school. Each of the program has a corresponding

task geared towards the implementation of the said program. Hence, these

programs will serve as the guide in the overall goal of the Elementary Teachers

in the Basic Education Department.

Teacher Focused Programs

Teachers are the back bone of any educational institution. The general peril is

that teachers are often so bombarded with focusing on the students that they

tend to get left behind. The cause is noble- a teacher is like candle consuming

itself for others. Its time that the University focuses on teacher development

particularly in the areas of research, further studies and linkage development.

36
 Combined Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Program Objective Monitoring Data gathering Success

period Method Indicator
Morale To enhance Whole Year Evaluation and Teachers
Enhancement academic Nomination should become
Program excellence slips more
through enthusiastic in
promotion of their everyday
faculty morale exposure to the
students
Quality To arrange Whole Year Seminar Teachers
Development peer to peer Assessment should be kept
Program involvement tools abreast with
and team the latest
seminars on development in
various areas the field of
of the education
profession through peer to
peer exposure.
Continuing To nurture Whole Year Outputs Teachers
Professional teachers’ submitted by should be able
Development professional Teachers and to submit
Program development echo seminars excellent
through prepared research work
collaborative on pedagogical
research work and other
studies and areas of
pedagogical learning.
contests and
curriculum

37
 developments

To enhance
professional
development
by requiring
teachers to
attend key
seminars and
conferences
and to require
teachers who
have attended
a seminar
output for
purposes of
echo seminars
Strengthening To ensure Yearly Research 100% of
Institutional institutional outputs teachers should
Standards excellence by engage in
asking the research study
teachers to that will
produce enhance the
quality institution and
research. support its
eight key
advocacy.
Community To create and Yearly Participation of Teachers
Development enhance key should be able
linkage stakeholders to connect with
partnerships. key
stakeholders
and enhance
their
participation in
school
activities.

38
 References

Ambut, C.V. (2010) Module in Planning, ISATU Publishing Center

Ambut,C.V. (2017) Research and Extension Planning Templates

University of San Agustin Handbook on Strategic Planning (2016)

39
40