Scribd
Upload
719 views

Data Collection Instruments

This document discusses different methods for collecting data in scientific research, including questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions. It provides details on designing and administering questionnaires, including defining objectives, writing questions, and pilot testing. It also describes structured, semi-structured, and in-depth interviews. Focus group discussions are outlined as a way to stimulate conversation around a topic. Recommended readings are included for further information.

Uploaded by

-
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
719 views

Data Collection Instruments

This document discusses different methods for collecting data in scientific research, including questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions. It provides details on designing and administering questionnaires, including defining objectives, writing questions, and pilot testing. It also describes structured, semi-structured, and in-depth interviews. Focus group discussions are outlined as a way to stimulate conversation around a topic. Recommended readings are included for further information.

Uploaded by

-
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Data Collection Instruments

(Questionnaire & Interview)

Dr. Karim Abawi


Training in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Geneva 2013

Geneva Workshop 2013


Data Collection Instruments
• Accurate and systematic data collection is critical to
conducting scientific research.
• Data collection allows us to collect information that we want
to collect about our study objects.
• Depending on research type, methods of data collection
include: documents review, observation, questioning,
measuring, or a combination of different methods.
Questionnaire
• A questionnaire is a data collection instrument
consistant of a series of questions and other
prompts for the purpose of gathering
information from respondents. The
questionnaire was invented by Sir Francis
Galton.

• Questionnaire. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia, September 2012.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questionnaire#References
Steps required to design and administer
a questionnaire
1. Defining the Objectives of the Study
2. Define the target respondents and methods to
reach them.
3. Questionnaire Design
4. Pilot Testing
5. Questionnaire Administration
6. Results Interpretation
1. Defining the Objectives of the Study

• A questionnaire should allow us to collect the


most complete and accurate data in a logical
flow.
– This is done in order to reach reliable conclusions
from what we are planning to observe.

• A well-designed questionnaire should meet the


research goal and objectives and minimize un-
answered questions—a common problem
bound to many surveys.
2. Define the target respondents and
methods to reach them
• The researcher should clearly define the target,
study populations from which she/ he collects
data and information.
• Main methods of reaching the respondents are:
personal contact, group of focus interview,
mail-based questionnaires, telephone
interview.
3. Writing the Questionnaire

• Before writing the questionnaire researcher should


decide on the questionnaire content.
• Each question should contribute to testing one or
more hypothesis/ research question established in the
research design.
Questions could be:
• Open format questions that are without a
predetermined set of responses.
• Closed format questions that take the form of a
multiple-choice question.
3. Writing the Questionnaire (Cont)
Points to be considered when writing and interpreting questionnaires:
• Clarity (question has the same meaning for all
respondents)
• Phrasing (short and simple sentences, only one piece
of information at a time, avoid negatives if possible,
ask precise questions, in line with respondent level of
knowledge…)
• Sensitive question: keen attention to approaches in
formulating questions that could be embarrassing to
respondents.
• Hypothetical Questions should be at avoided if
possible.
4. Questionnaire pilot testing

• The major challenge in questionnaire design is


to make it clear to all respondents.

• In-order to indentify and solve the confusing


points, we need to pre-test the questionnaire.

• During the pilot trial: the questionnaire


participants should be randomly selected from
the study population.
Conclusion
• Questionnaire design is a multi-step process.
• Questionnaires allow collection of both subjective and
objective data in a large sample of the study population
in order to obtain results that are statistically
significant. .
– Specially when resources are limited.
• It is a good tool for the protection of the privacy of
the participants.
• The validity of data and information depends on the
honesty of the respondent.
• The questionnaires can measure both qualitative and
quantitative data, but is it more appropriate for
quantitative data collection.
Interview
• Interviews consist of collecting data by asking
questions.
• Data can be collected by listening to individuals,
recording, filming their responses, or a combination of
methods.
There are four types of interview:
• Structured interview
• Semi-structured interview
• In-depth interview, and
• Focused group discussion
Structured interview
• In structured interviews the questions as well as
their order is already scheduled.
• Your additional intervention consists of giving
more explanation to clarify your question (if
needed), and to ask your respondent to provide
more explanation if the answer they provide is
vague (probing).
Semi-structured and in-depth interviews

• Semi-structured interviews include a number of


planned questions, but the interviewer has more
freedom to modify the wording and order of
questions.
• In-depth interview is less formal and the least
structured, in which the wording and questions are
not predetermined. This type of interview is more
appropriate to collect complex information with a
higher proportion of opinion-based information.
Advantages and disadvantages of
interview
Advantages:
•Collect complete information with greater understanding.
•It is more personal, as compared to questionnaires, allowing us to have higher
response rates.
•It allows for more control over the order and flow of questions.
•We can introduce necessary changes in the interview schedule based on initial results
(which is not possible in the case of a questionnaire study/ survey)

Disadvantages:
•Data analysis—especially when there is a lot of qualitative data.
•Interviewing can be tiresome for large numbers of participants.
•Risk of bias is high due to fatigue and to becoming too involved with interviewees.
.
Focus group discussion
• Focus group is a structured discussion with the purpose of stimulating
conversation around a specific topic.

• Focus group discussion is led by a facilitator who poses questions and the
participants give their thoughts and opinions.

• Focus group discussion gives us the possibility to cross check one individual’s
opinion with other opinions gathered.

• A well organized and facilitated FGD is more than a question and answer
session.

• In a group situation, members tend to be more open and the dynamics within
the group and interaction can enrich the quality and quantity of information
needed.
Focus group discussion, some practical
issues
• The ideal size of the Focus groups:
• 8-10 participants
• 1 Facilitator
• 1 Note-taker
• Preparation for the Focus Group
• Identifying the purpose of the discussion
• Identifying the participants
• Develop the questions
• Running the Focus Group
• 1) Opening the Discussion
• 2) Managing the discussion
• 3) Closing the focus group
• 4) Follow-up after the focus group
Recommended readings

1. Wai-Ching Leung. How to design a questionnaire. Student BMJ. 2001


June;9:187-9.
http://www.cochrane.es/files/Recursos/How_to_design_a_questionnaire.pdf

2. Patricia M Hudelson. Qualitative Research for Public Health Programmes.


WHO/MNH/PSF/94.3. Geneva 1994.
http://libdoc.who.int/hq/1994/WHO_MNH_PSF_94.3.pdf

3. Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000 Jan


1;320(7226):50-2.
Thank you !

You might also like