US 2013 0281879A1

(19) United States

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0281879 A1
Raniere (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 24, 2013
(54) DETERMINATION OF WHETHERA (52) U.S. Cl.
LUCFERAN CAN BE REHABILITATED CPC ...................................... A61 B 5/165 (2013.01)
USPC ............................ 600/558; 600/300; 600/559
(71) Applicant: FIRST PRINCIPLES, INC., ALBANY,
NY (US) (57) ABSTRACT
(72) Inventor: Keith A. Raniere, Clifton Park, NY Anaspect of the present invention is a method for determining
(US) whether a Luciferian can be rehabilitated. The method
includes stimulating the Luciferian with a first stimulus and
(21) Appl. No.: 13/839,361 recording a first physiological response by the Luciferian to
said first stimulus. The method includes determining, from
(22) Filed: Mar 15, 2013 the first physiological response, a first polarity of the Lucife
rians response to the first stimulus. The method includes
Related U.S. Application Data stimulating the Luciferian with a second stimulus and record
(63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/272,941, ing a second physiological response by the Luciferian to said
filed on Nov. 18, 2008, Continuation of application second stimulus. Further, the method includes determining,
No. 1 1/931,524, filed on Oct. 31, 2007, now aban- from the second physiological response, a second polarity of
doned. the Luciferian's response to the second stimulus. The method
includes comparing the first polarity to the second polarity to
Publication Classification determine whether the second polarity has a greater value
than the first polarity; and determining, from said comparing
(51) Int. Cl. of first polarity and second polarity, whether the Luciferian
A6 IB5/16 (2006.01) can be rehabilitated.

14 A Variably controllable
environment

fg a
16 Multimedia Stimulus 12

Audio Stimulus

instrumentation

Combination Stimulus

Algorithm
Computer

18
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 1 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 2 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

14 Variably Controllable
environment

N.

Multimedia Stimulus 12

Audio StimultiS

instrumentation

Combination Stimulus

Algorithm
Computer

f8

Fig. 3
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 3 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

Fig. 4

43
42
41

Fig. 5
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 4 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

ce is is
CS)
Fig. 6

S P 46

Si P
M-Dinnensional
S2 P Space
G

SN PN

Fig. 7
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 5 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

50

Flow Chart 51

52

53

56

Luciferian

Fig. 8
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 6 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

50

Flow Chart 51

Stimulating a Person

52

Recording Physiological Response

53

Determining Emotional Polarity

54

Providing a Space of Potential

Emotional Polarities

55

Providing Subspace of the Space

56

Determining Whether the Person is a

Luciferian

Fig. 9
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 7 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

13

Questionnaire

12

20

Instrumentation

22

Computer

26

Output
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 8 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

60
y
FOW Chart 61

Presenting Questionnaire to Person

62

Requesting Person Respond to items in

Questionnaire

63

Recording Responses to items On

Questionnaire

66

Determining Whether the Person is a

Luciferian

Fig. 11
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 9 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

60

Flow Chart 61

Presenting Questionnaire to Person

62

Requesting Person Respond to items in

Questionnaire

63

Recording Responses to items On

Questionnaire

64

Providing a Space of Potential

Emotional Polarities

65

Providing Subspace of the Space

66

Determining Whether the Person is a

Luciferian

Fig. 12
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 10 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

70

FIOW Chart 71

Presenting Questionnaire to Person

72

Requesting Person Respond to items in

Questionnaire

73

Recording Responses to items On

Questionnaire

74

Recording Physiological Response

75

Determining Emotional Polarities

76

Recording Emotional Polarities

Fig. 13
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 11 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

Fow Chart Fig. 4

Stipulating a Luciferian with First Stimulus

Recording Physiological Response to First Stimulus

Determining First Emotional Polarity

Stimulating Luciferian with Second Stimulus

Recording Physiological Response to Second Stimulus

Recording Physiological Response to Second Stimulus

Comparing First Emotional Polarity and Second

Emotional Polarity to Determine Greater Value

Recording Physiological Response to Second Stimulus

Recording Physiological Response to Second Stimulus

Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 12 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

Stimulating Luciferian with Piurality of

Constructive Stimulus

Recording Physiological Response to Each 92

Constructive Stimulus

Determining Corresponding Emotional

Polarity for Each Constructive Stimulus

Comparing Corresponding Polarity for Each

Constructive Stimulus to Determine Greatest
Value

Determining Humanity of Luciferian -95

Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 13 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

Fig.16
00

Flow Chart

Stimulating Luciferian with Plurality of Constructive ... O

Stimuli and Piurality of Destructive Stimuli

Recording Physiological Response to Each -02

Constructive Stimulus and Each Destructive Stimulus

Determining Corresponding Polarity for Each 103

Constructive Stimulus and Each Destructive Stimulus

Comparing Corresponding Polarity for Each

Constructive Stimulus to Determine Greatest Value of 04
Polarity for Constructive Stimulus

Comparing Corresponding Polarity for Each Destructive

Stimulus to Determine Greatest Value of Polarity for
Constructive Stimulus

Comparing Greatest Value of Polarity for Constructive

Stimulus to Greatest Value of Polarity for Destructive
Stimulus to Determine which Is Higher

Ef Greatest Value of Polarity for Constructive Stimulus

is Higher than Greatest Value of Polarity for Destructive
Stimulus, Determine Humanity Based on Greatest Value 07
of Polarity for Constructive Stimulus;
If Lower, Determine That Luciferian Lacks Humanity
Patent Application Publication Oct. 24, 2013 Sheet 14 of 14 US 2013/0281879 A1

4. 10 20

Visual Stinuus Y-m-m-m-m-m-m-Yr-M-

Audio Stimulus u1
Stiraulus

8
Computer

Tactile Stimulus

Multineda
Stimulus

Wariable
controllable
environment

FIG. 7
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

DETERMINATION OF WHETHERA 0008. A second general aspect of the present invention is a

LUCFERAN CAN BE REHABILITATED method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian, compris
ing: stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of construc
RELATED APPLICATIONS tive stimuli; recording a physiological response by said
0001. This application is a continuation in part of Ser. No. Luciferian corresponding to each constructive stimulus of
said plurality of constructive stimuli; determining, for said
12/272,941, filed on Nov. 18, 2008, which is a continuation of each constructive stimulus, a corresponding polarity of said
Ser. No. 1 1/931,524, filed on Oct. 31, 2007. physiological response; comparing said corresponding polar
BACKGROUND
ity of said physiological response for said each constructive
stimulus to determine a greatest value; and determining, from
0002 1. Technical Field said greatest value, said humanity of said Luciferian.
0003. The present invention relates to a method for deter 0009. A third general aspect of the present invention is a
mining whether a person, who has destructive tendencies, method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian, compris
may be rehabilitated. ing: stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of destructive
stimuli; recording a physiological response by said Lucifer
0004 2. Related Art ian corresponding to each destructive stimulus of said plural
0005 Organizations such as businesses, religions, govern ity of destructive stimuli; determining, for said each destruc
ments, law enforcement agencies, Schools, etc. have had dif tive stimulus, a corresponding polarity of said physiological
ficulties when individuals disrupt the organizations well response; comparing said corresponding polarity of said
being by committing destructive acts. If organizations can physiological response for each destructive stimulus to deter
identify such individuals they may better interact with them. mine a least value; and determining, from said least value,
Since these destructive individuals do not overtly disclose said humanity of said Luciferian.
their nature, it is not easy to detect their presence. Failure to
discover these individuals could be costly due to their BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
destructive inclinations. There is a need to determine whether
a given person, who has destructive tendencies, may be reha 0010 FIG. 1 depicts a representation of a human brain
bilitated. identifying the locations of the Ventral tegmental area, the
nucleus accumbens, and the prefrontal cortex.
SUMMARY 0011 FIG. 2 depicts a person’s relative change in dopam
ine levels as represented by positron emission tomography
0006. The present invention provides an objective and (PET) scans.
accurate capability for determining whethera Luciferian may 0012 FIG.3 depicts a person's physiological responses to
be rehabilitated. A Luciferian is a person, who commits a stimulus, said physiological responses being recorded by
destructive acts. A Luciferian is a type of Sociopath. He has instrumentation, said physiological responses being pro
severe behavioral problems that are masked by good psycho cessed according to an algorithm to determine whether the
logical adjustment. He appears on the outside to be sane but person is a Luciferian.
he is not. A Luciferian is fundamentally unhappy and feels 0013 FIG. 4 depicts a space of potential polarities in rela
enmity toward others but has learned that, for him, pleasure tion to the stimulus of FIG. 3 and a subspace of the space,
can be had from achieving his selfish desires such as destroy wherein the Subspace defines a Luciferian.
ing material objects or relationships, and causing others pain, 0014 FIG. 5 depicts an event stream comprised by the
distress, or unhappiness. A Luciferian realizes his desires by Stimulus of FIG. 3.
any means—without consideration for others and without (0015 FIG. 6 represents the stimulus of FIG.3 as having N
remorse. A Luciferian is a person lacking in conscience and stimulus components with an associated N polarity compo
loyalty to others. He commonly employs manipulation and nents, wherein N2.
deceit to achieve his desired end and is therefore capable of 0016 FIG. 7 represents the N stimulus components and N
acts that could be highly destructive to those that interact with polarity components of FIG. 6 as an N-component stimulus
him. A Luciferian, therefore, typically experiences pleasure vector S and an associated N-component polarity vector P.
or gratification in situations where “normal” people would be (0017 FIG. 8 depicts a flow chart for determining whether
repulsed or disturbed. the person in FIG. 3 is a Luciferian.
0007. A first general aspect of the present invention is a (0018 FIG.9 depicts the flow chart of FIG.8 with added
method for determining whether a Luciferian can be rehabili steps relating to the space of FIG. 4.
tated, comprising: stimulating said Luciferian with a first 0019 FIG. 10 depicts a person’s response to items on a
stimulus; recording a first physiological response by said questionnaire, said responses being recorded by instrumen
Luciferian to said first stimulus; determining, from said first tation, said responses being processed according to an algo
physiological response, a first polarity of said Luciferian's rithm to determine whether the person is a Luciferian.
physiological response to said first stimulus; stimulating the 0020 FIG. 11 depicts a flow chart for determining whether
Luciferian with a second stimulus; recording a second physi the person in FIG. 10 is a Luciferian.
ological response by the Luciferian to said second stimulus; (0021 FIG. 12 depicts the flow chart of FIG.11 with added
determining, from said second physiological response, a sec steps relating to the space of FIG. 4.
ond polarity of the Luciferian's physiological response to 0022 FIG. 13 depicts a flow chart for generating a polarity
said second stimulus; comparing said first polarity to said profile of a questionnaire.
second polarity to determine whether said second polarity has 0023 FIG. 14 depicts a flow chart for determining whether
a greater value than said first polarity; and determining, from the Luciferian may be rehabilitated.
said comparing of said first polarity and said second polarity, 0024 FIG. 15 depicts a flow chart for determining a
whether said Luciferian can be rehabilitated. humanity of a Luciferian.
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

0025 FIG. 16 depicts a flow chart for an alternative to the OFC it now correlates with how pleasant or unpleasant
method of determining a humanity of a Luciferian. the stimulus may be rated. As each sensory signal passes
0026 FIG. 17 depicts the recording and processing a through the OFC, it may receive a level of liking or disliking
response to a stimulus. Activity in the OFC may increase or decrease in line with the
level of pleasure people may feel for a given stimulus.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
0031. The ventral pallidum and OFC may be associated
0027 Strong feelings of satisfaction are associated with with pleasure, but other parts of the brains cortex may also
behaviors that meet various human needs. For example, spe become especially active during pleasure Such as the cingu
cific areas in the human brain provide pleasurable sensations late cortex and somatosensory cortex. The emotion of plea
as a “reward” for these behaviors. These areas are intercon Sure may include the dopamine and opiate circuits and OFC,
nected with one another to form what is known as the “reward but actually feeling pleasure may require a level of reflection
circuit'. The reward circuit in the brain provides feelings of that can only be provided by other brain regions that carry
satisfaction to encourage us to repeat pleasurable experiences sensory maps or representations of our bodies—the cingulate
that we learn in the course of our lives. The reward circuit is cortex. Somatosensory cortex and certain parts of the brain
at the heart of our mental activity and guides all our behaviors. Stem.
This circuit is complex, but it contains a central link that plays 0032 Testing for physiological evidence of elevated activ
a fundamental role. This link is comprised of the nerve con ity in the reward or pleasure center of the brain has not been
nections between two particular Small groups of neurons. used to determine whether a Luciferian may be rehabilitated
FIG. 1 contains a depiction of the human brain and the loca or to determine a Luciferian's humanity. The present inven
tion of these groups of neurons. One of these groups is located tion seeks to determine whether a Luciferian takes more
in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) 1, and the other in the pleasure in some aspect of human welfare, animal welfare,
nucleus accumbens 2. The chemical messenger that makes human value or human dignity than the pleasure that the
the connections between these two groups of neurons is Luciferian takes in destruction.
dopamine. Dopamine is a chemical messenger (neurotrans 0033 Ser. No. 12/272,941 provides testing for physiologi
mitter) in the brain. Thus, there is an association between cal evidence of elevated activity in the reward or pleasure
feelings of pleasure and dopamine. For example, when the center of the brain used as away to ascertain whetheraperson
cortex has received and processed a sensory stimulus indicat is a Luciferian. Physiological characteristics which can be
ing a reward, it sends a signal announcing this reward to the independent, dependent, or interdependent with the pleasure
VTA 1 whose activity then increases. The VTA 1 then releases center can be used as indicators of whether a person is a
dopamine, not only into the nucleus accumbens 2 but also into Luciferian Such as changes in heart rate, blood pressure,
the septum, the amygdala, and the prefrontal cortex 3. The respiration depth, electrodermal response, skin temperature,
nucleus accumbens 2 then activates the individual’s motor
functions, while the prefrontal cortex 3 focuses his or her Sweating, muscle electrical activity, and cerebral blood flow.
attention. These regions are part of the reward circuit. The 0034 Testing to determine whether a person is a Lucifer
reward circuit is part of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), ian may include Subjecting a person to a stimulus. A response
whose activation leads to the repetition of the gratifying to a stimulus may be an emotional, chemical, or physiological
action to strengthen the associated pathways in the brain. response which may be expressed as a polarity (P). The polar
0028. The MFB is a bundle of axons that originates in the ity of the response of a person to a stimulus is indicative of an
reticular formation, crosses the VTA, passes through the lat extent to which the emotional, chemical, or physiological
eral hypothalamus, and continues into the nucleus accumbens response is positive or negative. For example, a scale of
as well as the amygdala, the septum, and the prefrontal cortex. polarity may be defined such that: P=0 is a neutral point at
The MFB is composed of ascending and descending path which the response is neither positive nor negative: P-O may
ways, including most of the pathways that use monoamines as denote a positive response Such that P increases as the mag
a neurotransmitter. The mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic nitude of the positive response increases; and P-O may denote
system is one of its main components. This system comes into a negative response such that Palgebraically decreases as the
play when a person experiences pleasure. magnitude of the negative response increases.
0029. Another distinct pleasure circuit, driven by opioids, 0035. In FIG. 4, the space 30 is the locus of all potential
overlaps considerably with the dopamine system, to the point emotional, chemical, and physiological polarities of the
where some cells take part in both circuits. A key part of this polarity of the response of the person 10 to the stimulus S. In
system is the Ventral pallidum which takes in signals from the other words, the space 30 includes all possible polarities that
nucleus accumbens and passes them on to the cortex. Addi could manifestby any arbitrary person Subjected to the stimu
tionally, cells nearer the surface of the brain, in a region of the lus S. FIG. 4 also shows the space 30 as consisting of a
forebrain called the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), may have a subspace 32 and a subspace 34. If the algorithm 22 deter
vital role as well. mines that the polarity of the person 10 falls within the sub
0030 Pleasure is a direct response to a sensory stimulus. space 32 then the person 10 is determined to be a Luciferian.
One of the first brain regions to process sensory information Conversely, if the algorithm 22 determines that the polarity of
is the OFC. Signals such as taste, touch, Smells, and Sounds the person 10 falls within the subspace 34 or on the interfacial
travel first to the sensory cortex, and from there go straight to boundary 35 between subspaces 32 and 34, then the person 10
the OFC. Visual information enters by a slightly less direct is determined not to be a Luciferian. Such determination of
route. From here the signal passes into the opioid and dopam which subspace (32 or 34) the polarity of the person 10 falls
ine circuits. A pleasant or unpleasant Smell, taste, or touch is within could also be made by a human being instead of by the
represented in the sensory cortex simply as a magnitude— algorithm 22 within the computer 24, wherein the human
strong brain activity for a strong Smell and weak brain activity being would utilize the same methodology as is utilized by the
for a faint one, for example. But by the time it has passed on algorithm 22.
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

0036. The space 30, as well as the subspaces 32 and 34 0039. The multimedia stimulus 19 may include combina
individually, could be represented in any electronic dataset tions of the visual and audio stimuli Such as combinations of
format as may exist in, inter alia, a database, table, file, text, sound, graphics, animation, photo images, and full-mo
spreadsheet, etc. FIG. 4 shows such a dataset 36 for repre tion video. A combination stimulus 21 may include any com
senting the space 30, wherein a portion 37 of the dataset 36 bination of visual, audio, tactile, multimedia, or any other
represents the subspace 32, and wherein a portion 38 of the stimulus. An example of an audiovisual stimulus that would
dataset 36 represents the subspace 34. Alternatively, the por increases the response of the of the reward circuit for a Lucife
tion 38 may not be present if the portion 37 is present, since rian would be a video depicting the failure of an athlete by
the algorithm 22 need only test for whether the polarity of the falling just before the finish line and losing or a skier crashing
person 10 falls within the subspace 32; thus the algorithm 22 during a great athletic event. This would result in a positive
needs to know the scope of the subspace 32 and does not need polarity for the Luciferian. A negative polarity would be if the
Luciferian were to see the athlete or skier be successful.
to know the scope of the subspace 34. Similarly, the portion
37 may not be present if the portion 38 is present, since the 0040. The instrumentation 20 serves to record the physi
algorithm 22 need only test for whether the polarity of the ological responses 12, which may include involuntary or
person 10 does not fall within the subspace 34; thus the unintentional responses, under the assumption that the physi
algorithm 22 needs to know the scope of the subspace 34 and ological responses 12 could be used to infer the responses of
does not need to know the scope of the subspace 32. the person 10 to the stimulus S. Medical instrumentation 20
0037 FIG. 3 depicts a recording and processing of may be devices which are used to measure attributes of human
physiology. The variable measured may include any measur
responses 12 of a person 10 to a stimulus (S). The depiction in able variable related to human physiology. Examples of
FIG.3 may be referred to as a test to determine whether a instrumentation 20 may include, inter alia, medical instru
person is a Luciferian. A test to determine whetheraperson is mentation Such as an electroencephalogram (EEG) instru
a Luciferian comprises a person Subjected to a stimulus and a ment, a computed axial tomography (CAT) instrument, a
recording of a response to the stimulus. The stimulus S is a positron emission tomography (PET) instrument, a magnetic
factor capable of eliciting a response from a person. The resonance imaging (MRI) instrument, an electromyogram
stimulus S may be a visual stimulus 14, an audio stimulus 16, (EMG) instrument, a polygraph instrument, or combinations
a tactile stimulus 18, a multimedia stimulus 19, or any other thereof.
stimulus. A combination stimulus 21 may be any combination
of a visual stimulus 14, an audio stimulus 16, a tactile stimu 0041. For example, FIG. 2 contains PET scan images evi
lus 18, a multimedia stimulus 19, or any other stimulus. The dencing increased levels of dopamine in the brain particu
stimulus S may be obvious or unobvious as a test element to larly in the nucleus accumbens 2. PET scanners may be used
the person 10 subjected to a test. The person 10 may be in a to view brain activity in test subjects who have been injected
variably controllable environment 23 while subjected to the with a chemical that binds to dopamine receptors in the brain,
stimulus S. Controllable environmental conditions may but is less able to bind when the brain is releasing dopamine.
include temperature, humidity, air movement, lighting, room A decrease in binding to the receptors is associated with an
size, room shape, location, setting, odor, noise, or any other increase in dopamine release, while an increase in binding
external physical condition Surrounding the person 10. A indicates reduced release of dopamine. This technique pro
response to a stimulus may include physiological, emotional, vides a visualization of the strength and location of dopamine
cognitive, oral, written, or other like responses by a person to release. The PET scan images in FIG. 2 illustrate an increase
a stimulus. Physiological responses 12 may be recorded by of dopamine 4 relative to a baseline level 5. Scans show the
instrumentation 20 and Subsequently processed according to concentration of available dopamine receptors on a scale that
an algorithm 22 stored in a data processing device 24 to goes from blue (low) to red (high). More dopamine receptors
determine, and to display as output 26, whether the person 10 available means less dopamine is in the brain. PET scans may
is a Luciferian. be used in this way to indicate when a test Subject experiences
an increase of dopamine in response to a stimulus.
0038. The stimulus S may be of a type that evokes a 0042 Examples of a polarity of P=0 would be for a per
response from the person 10. The stimulus S may include one
of or a combination of the visual stimulus 14, the audio son's normal chemical balance of dopamine or normal neural
stimulus 16, the tactile stimulus 18, the multimedia stimulus activity, based on Statistical sampling and given that the indi
19, or any other factor or combination of factors capable of vidual does not have drugs in his system, drug addiction,
eliciting a response from the person 10. Examples of the mental or physical illness, obesity, or other factors that may
visual stimulus 14 include, inter alia, a movie; a series of skew normal dopamine or neural activity levels.
pictures; a sports telecast, a sequence of colors; etc. Examples 0043. The responses 12 may include voluntary or inten
of the audio stimulus 16 include, interalia, a recital of a book, tional responses such as responding to items on a question
emotionally provocative Sounds; expressions of anger, fear, naire as will be discussed infra in conjunction with FIGS. 9
pain, laughter, white noise, Subliminal signals; etc. White and 10 or the responses 12 may include involuntary or unin
noise is a random signal with a flat power spectral density. In tentional physiological responses such as, interalia, changes
other words, the signal's power spectral density has equal in heart rate, blood pressure, respiration depth, electrodermal
power in any band, at any center frequency, having a given response, skin temperature, muscle electrical activity, cere
bandwidth. Examples of the tactile stimulus 18 include, inter bral blood flow, and neural activity in pleasure centers of the
alia, touching a dead person or dead animal. As a response to brain. If the responses 12 include such voluntary or inten
tactile stimulus of touching the dead person or dead animal, if tional physiological responses, then the instrumentation 20,
the individual is Luciferian, one response in the subset would Such as a polygraph instrument, may be used to ascertain
be a positive polarity based on the increase of chemical and whether the person 10 has been truthful in his or her voluntary
electrical activity in the “reward circuit'. or intentional responses.
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

0044 Polarity may be inferred from data collected by the very end, a mistake is made during a jump and the skater
medical instrumentation 20 such as EEG, CAT, PET, MRI, falls to the ice—all hope of winning the event is gone. A
EMG, and polygraph. For example, EEG may be used to Luciferian will experience pleasure and satisfaction from
assess brain electrical activity. While connected to EEG this. Accordingly, the Luciferian's neurophysiological pro
instrumentation, a test Subject may be subjected to a stimulus cesses 12 will register pleasure over the skater's misfortune
S. Electrical signals produced by the brain neurons in which may be identified and quantified using the medical
response to the stimulus S are picked up by electrodes and instrumentation 20. On the other hand, a non-Luciferian will
may be transmitted to a polygraph for analysis. Similarly, feel sympathetic and empathize with the unfortunate skater.
PET and CAT scans may be used to obtain information about Unlike the Luciferian, a non-Luciferian's neurophysiological
brain function and to study brain activity in response to a processes 12 will not register as pleasure for this stimulus.
stimulus S. EEG, PET, and CAT recordings may be analyzed 0049. Another example of a test to determine whether a
for abnormalities to reveal a polarity to a given stimulus S. person is a Luciferian that may be given is to have the Subject
The recorded physiological responses 12 of the person 10 view a film of human torture. Instrumentation 20 will reveal
may be processed by an algorithm 22 executed by a computer that a Luciferian Subject viewing a torture movie is experi
24. Generally, any data processing hardware (e.g., a micro encing a pleasure response. Further, external stimuli (i.e. not
processor) capable of executing compiled code, interpreted included in the torture movie) Such as a door slamming will
code, or hard-wired code could be used instead of the com not elicit much response, if any, from a Luciferian Subject. A
puter 24. Alternatively, the recorded physiological responses Luciferian may be enjoying the scene too much to divert
12 could be processed by a human being instead of by data attention to other things. This may also be due to a low startle
processing hardware. The output 26 expresses the result of the response typical of Sociopaths. In contrast, when a non-Lu
processing of the recorded physiological responses 12, and ciferian views a torture movie, pleasure centers in the brain
said output 26 may include an expression of whether or not are not responsive and may even diminish from a previous
the person 10 is a Luciferian. level. A non-Luciferian will exhibit a greater response to
0045. The algorithm 22 determines the polarity of the external stimuli such as a door slamming. This may be due to
response of the person 10 to the stimulus S, and further a desire to direct attention elsewhere rather than on the
determines whether the person is a Luciferian. After the algo uncomfortable scene in the movie. The preceding examples
rithm 22 determines said polarity, the algorithm 22 may uti are merely illustrative and any other criteria for defining the
lize a space 30, as exemplified in FIG. 4 to determine whether Scope of a Luciferian.
the person is a Luciferian. 0050. A test to determine whetheraperson is a Luciferian
0046. The algorithm 22 may be executed in real time in may comprise elements designed to identify a person’s true
direct response to the recording of the physiological physiological response to stimuli. A Luciferian may fear dis
responses 12 by the instrumentation 20. For said real-time covery and may attempt to outwit a test that would reveal his
execution of the algorithm 22, the algorithm 22 should be true character. A Luciferian may try to control his responses,
electronically coupled to the physiological data recorded by possibly by disinterest or unresponsiveness to certain types of
the instrumentation 20. Alternatively, the algorithm 22 may stimuli or possibly by mimicking responses he feels would be
be executed off-line after the recording of the physiological appropriate from “normal” people. Accordingly, a test may
responses 12 by the instrumentation 20. For said off-line have obvious stimulus S test elements (e.g. questionnaire,
execution of the algorithm 22, the algorithm 22 may or may movie clips, pictures, etc.), but a test may also incorporate
not be electronically coupled to the physiological data stimulus S test elements which are unobvious. A test may
recorded by the instrumentation 20. contain stimuli that a subject does not realize are part of the
0047 Using well-known concepts of physiology and test. There may be unobvious test stimuli that are being
medical instrumentation, the subspace 32 within the space 30 administered before, during, or after, the obvious test ele
may be generated. A test to determine whether a person is a ments. Unobvious test stimuli may be of any type including
Luciferian comprises a person Subjected to a stimulus S and visual 14, audio 16, tactile 18, multimedia 19, and combina
recording of a response to the stimulus S. Such as that tion 21. For example, unobvious test stimuli may be sublimi
depicted in FIG. 3. A test to determine whether a person is a nal audio or video signals, a slamming door, a person tripping
Luciferian may be designed to identify the types of stimuli on a sidewalk while visible to a subject through an outside
that elicit pleasure responses in a test Subject. For example, a window, or any other stimuli that may be administered to a
person may be subjected to a neuropsychological test com subject without the subject's recognition that the stimuli is
prising a stimulus S. Neuroimaging, using medical instru part of a test. Unobvious stimuli may be the primary test or a
mentation 20 may be used to identify and/or quantify neuro part of the primary test. On the other hand, responses to
physiological processes 12 in the pleasure systems of the unobvious test stimuli may confirm or bring into question the
brain in response to the neuropsychological test stimulus S. responses to the obvious test stimuli. In this way, true
Based on the stimulus S, and the corresponding response 12, responses may be captured from a Luciferian attempting to
a polarity may be determined. A space 30 may be created for “beat a test.
each stimulus S. Luciferian-type polarities are a subspace 32 0051. The stimulus S of FIG.3 may be an event stream
of the space 30. The subspace 32 may be identified directly by such as the event stream 40 shown in FIG. 5, in accordance
defining the range of polarities a Luciferian would produce or with embodiments of the present invention. In FIG. 5, the
the subspace 32 may be identified indirectly by defining what event stream 40 includes events 41,42, and 43. Although FIG.
range of polarities a non-Luciferian would produce within the 5 shows 3 events, the number of such events may be any
space 30, and selecting all others as the sub space 32. positive integer of at least 1. An example of the event stream
0048 One example of a test to determine whetheraperson 40 is a sequence of events occurring in an activity Such as,
is a Luciferian comprises a video clip of an ice skater per inter alia, a movie in which the events 41, 42, and 43 each
forming in a competition. Everything goes flawlessly until, at represent a scene or scenery occurring in a time interval
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

within the movie. The event stream 40 may include the entire 10 to the stimulus S is within said subspace, then the person is
activity (e.g., the movie), or the event stream 40 may include determined to be a Luciferian.
a continuous or discontinuous Subset of the activity, wherein 0057 FIG. 3 may be modified to reflect an alternative
the subset is not the entire activity. Other examples of event mechanism for determining whether the person 10 is a
streams include a movie, a play, a television performance, a Luciferian, using a “questionnaire' as the stimulus S instead
sports event, and a military event. The event stream 40 may be of or in addition to, for example, the visual stimulus 14, the
presented in a real-time mode; e.g., if the event is a sports audio stimulus 16, the tactile stimulus 18, the multimedia
event such as a football game then the football game would stimulus 19, and the combination stimulus 21. A question
presented as the stimulus S to the person 10 in real time while naire may be combined with other stimuli by containing items
the football game is being actually played. The event stream or questions related to the other stimuli. For example, a per
40 may alternatively be presented in a playback mode; e.g., if son may be shown a video followed by a questionnaire asking
the event is a sports event such as a football game then the specific questions about the video. A questionnaire may be
football game would first be recorded (such as on video tape) used in variably controllable environmental conditions 23.
and Subsequently presented (by being played back) as the For example, a person may complete the same questionnaire
stimulus S to the person 10. two times—first at 70°F. and then at 85°F. Following this, the
0052) If the stimulus SofFIG.3 comprises Nevents (N1) two sets of answers provided in response to the questionnaire
of an event stream, then the stimulus S may comprise N may be compared for inconsistencies that may reveal apolar
components S. S. ..., Sy respectively corresponding to the ity of the person. Accordingly, FIG. 10 depicts a recording
Nevents of the event stream. For each such stimulus compo and processing of responses 12 of a person 10 to a stimulus S
nent S (i=1,2,..., N), there is an associated polarity P, of the in the form of a questionnaire 13, in accordance with embodi
response of the person 10 to the stimulus component S. Thus, ments of the present invention. The questionnaire 13 may be
the N polarities P, P.,..., Pyare respectively associated with administered to a person 10 in writing or orally. The responses
the N Stimulus components S1, S2,..., Sy as depicted in FIG. 12 may represent Voluntary or intentional responses by the
6, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. person 10 to items on the questionnaire 13 and/or they may
0053 S is defined herein as an N-component stimulus represent involuntary or unintentional responses. As in FIG.
vector having components S. S. ..., Sy as depicted in FIG. 3, the responses 12 may be recorded by instrumentation 20
7, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. and Subsequently processed according to an algorithm 22
FIG. 7 also shows that the stimulus vector S results, via the stored in a data processing device 24 to determine, and to
configuration of FIG.3, in an N-component polarity vector P display as output 26, whether the person 10 is a Luciferian.
having components P. P. . . . . P. In FIG. 7, an M-dimen The instrumentation 20 may include any device (e.g., a sheet
sional space 46 embodies the space 30 of FIG. 4, and the of paper, a computer diskette, etc.) that records physiological
subset 48 of the space 46 embodies the subset 32 of the space responses 12. The instrumentation 20 may include a poly
30 of FIG. 4. If P. P.,..., Pyare mutually independent, then graph instrument which may be used to ascertain whether the
M-N. If one of P. P. . . . . P is dependent upon another of person 10 has been truthful in his or her voluntary or inten
P. P. . . . . P then M-N, wherein N-M is the number of tional responses, by correlating the Voluntary response with
such mutual dependencies. FIG. 7 shows a projection 45 of the polygraph data.
the polarity vector P into the space 46 to determine if the 0.058 Some or all of the responses by the person 10 may
polarity vector P is within the subspace 48. If the polarity reflect apolarity of the person 10. Alternatively, at least one of
vector P is determined, such as by the algorithm 22 of FIG.3, the responses by the person 10 may reflect a polarity of the
to be within the subspace 48, then the person 10 of FIG.3 has person 10, in order to make it difficult for the person 10 to
is determined to be a Luciferian. guess, or otherwise try to determine, the purpose of each item
on the questionnaire 13.
0054) A special case of FIG. 7 arises for N=1 in which the 0059 FIG. 11 depicts a flow chart 60 that describes steps
stimulus S has exactly one stimulus component. In this spe in a method for determining whether the person 10 in FIG. 3
cial case N=M=1 and there is one response and one associated is a Luciferian. The flow chart 60 presents the embodiments
polarity. For this special case, the space 30 of FIG. 4, or the associated with use of the questionnaire 13 of FIG. 10. The
space 46 of FIG. 7, thus comprises a one-dimensional range flow chart 60 comprises steps 61, 62,63, and 66. Referring to
of polarities.
both FIG. 11 and FIG. 3, the step 61 presenting the question
0055 FIG.8 depicts a flow chart 50 that describes steps in naire 13 to the person 10, wherein the questionnaire 13 com
a method for determining whether the person 10 in FIG. 3 is prises a plurality of items. The step 62 requests the person 10
a Luciferian. The flow chart 50 presents an alternative view in to communicate a Voluntary response to each item of the
conjunction with FIGS. 3-7. The flow chart 50 comprises plurality of items. The step 63 records the voluntary response
steps 51, 52,53, and 56. Referring to both FIG. 8 and FIG.3, of the person 10 to each item of the plurality of items. The step
the step 51 stimulates the person 10 with the stimulus S. The 66 determines, from said voluntary response of the person 10
step 52 records the response 12 by the person 10 to stimulus to the items on the questionnaire 13, whether the person 10 is
S. The step 53 determines, from the response 12, a polarity of a Luciferian, based on a predetermined prescription. The
the response of the person 10 to the stimulus S. The step 56 algorithm 22 of FIG. 10 may include said predetermined
determines, from said polarity of the response of the person prescription. Use of predetermined prescription is analogous
10 to the stimulus S, whether the person 10 is a Luciferian. to the space 30 and subspace 32 of FIG. 4 (or the space 46 and
0056 FIG.9 depicts the flow chart of FIG.8 with added subspace 48 of FIG. 7), described supra.
steps 54 and 55 relating to a space such as the space 30 of FIG. 0060 FIG. 10, depicts the flow chart of FIG. 11 with added
4 or the space 46 of FIG. 7. The step 54 provides the space. steps 64 and 65. The step 64 determining a polarity of the
The step 55 provides a subspace of the space associated with voluntary or intentional responses of the person 10 to each
step 54 such that if the polarity of the response of the person item of the plurality of items. The step 65 determines, from
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

the polarity of the voluntary or intentional responses of the may be rehabilitated. FIG. 14 depicts a flow chart 80 for
person 10 to each item of the plurality of items, whether the determining whether the person 10, pre-determined to be a
person is a Luciferian. Luciferian, may be rehabilitated, in accordance with the
0061. In FIGS. 11 and 12, the requesting step 62 may present invention. The flow chart 80 of FIG. 14 comprises the
comprise requesting the person 10 to communicate a struc steps 81, 82.83, 84, 85, 86, 87, and 88. Referring to FIG. 14,
tured voluntary response to at least one item of the plurality of the step 81 stimulates the person 10 with a first stimulus. The
items. Said structured voluntary response may be selected by step 82 records the response 12a by the person 10 to first
the person 10 from a predetermined set of responses for each stimulus. The step 83 determines, from response 12a, a first
item on the questionnaire 13. polarity of the response 12a of the person 10 to the first
0062 Alternatively, the requesting step 62 may comprise stimulus. The step 84 stimulates the person 10 with a second
requesting the person 10 to communicate an unstructured stimulus. The step 85 records the response 12b by the person
voluntary response to at least one item of the plurality of 10 to second stimulus. The step 86 determines, from response
items. The predetermined prescription may include a com 12b, a polarity of the response 12b of the person 10 to the
parison of the unstructured Voluntary response with a prede second stimulus. The step 87 compares the two polarities to
termined set of responses. determine whether the first polarity or second polarity has a
0063. In addition to recording the voluntary or intentional greater value. The step 88 determines whether person 10 can
responses of the person 10, the instrumentation 20 may be rehabilitated.
include instrument(s) that record involuntary or unintentional 0068. In accordance with FIG. 14, a first stimulus and a
physiological responses by the person 10 while the person 10 second stimulus are factors capable of eliciting responses
is communicating Voluntary or intentional responses of the from a person 10, pre-determined to be a Luciferian. The first
person 10 to the items on the questionnaire 13. stimulus may be a visual stimulus 14, an audio stimulus 16, a
0064 All aspects of FIGS. 3-7, discussed supra, apply to tactile stimulus 18, a multimedia stimulus 19, any other factor
use of the questionnaire 13 in FIG. 10 in conjunction with the or combination of factors capable of eliciting a response from
flow chart 60 of FIGS. 11 and 12. Such aspects of FIGS. 3-9 the person 10. The first stimulus may be obvious or unobvious
include, inter alia, use of the instrumentation 20, algorithm as a test element to determine whether person 10 may be
22, computer 24, and output 26 of FIG. 3; the space 30 and rehabilitated. The second stimulus may be a visual stimulus
dataset 36 of FIG. 4; the event stream 40 of FIG. 5; the 14, an audio stimulus 16, a tactile stimulus 18, a multimedia
stimulus components and associated vector S, the polarity stimulus 19, any other factor or combination of factors
components and associated vector P, and space 46 of FIGS. 6 capable of eliciting a response from the person 10. The second
and 7. stimulus may be obvious or unobvious as a test element to
0065. A method for generating a polarity profile of the determine whether person 10 may be rehabilitated. The per
questionnaire 13, comprises correlating recorded polarities son 10, pre-determined to be a Luciferian, may be in a vari
with recorded Voluntary responses in relation to the question ably controllable environment 23 while subjected to the first
naire 13. The recorded voluntary responses and the recorded stimulus. The person 10, pre-determined to be a Luciferian,
polarities are derived from the following procedure, depicted may be in a variably controllable environment 23 while sub
in the flow chart 70 in FIG. 13, as applied to a symbolic person jected to the second stimulus.
representing each individual of N individuals such that N is 0069 FIG. 14 depicts a recording and processing of
large enough for said correlating to be statistically significant. responses of a person 10 to a first stimulus and second stimu
In FIG. 13, step 71 presents to the person the questionnaire 13 lus to determine whether person 10 (pre-determined to be a
comprising a plurality of items. The step 72 requests the Luciferian) may be rehabilitated. A test of FIG. 14 comprises
person to communicate a Voluntary response to each item of Subjecting the person 10, pre-determined to be a Luciferian,
the plurality of items. The step 73 records the voluntary to a first stimulus and recording of a first response 12a to the
responses of the person. The step 74 records physiological stimulus by a medical instrumentation 20. In accordance with
responses of the person while the person is communicating FIG. 17, an algorithm 27 is stored in data processing device
the voluntary responses. The step 75 determines, from the 24. The test of FIG. 17 comprises processing response 12a.
physiological responses, polarities of the Voluntary An algorithm 27 processes the response 12a by determining
responses. The step 76 records the polarities. The recorded the first polarity of the response 12a of the person 10 to the
Voluntary responses of the person and recorded polarities are first stimulus. The test of FIG. 14 comprises subjecting the
then utilized for performing said correlating. person 10, determined to be a Luciferian, to the second stimu
0066. A subjective evaluation may be used to supplement lus. A response 12b to the second stimulus may be recorded
an objective evaluation of a person in the determination of by instrumentation 20. Algorithm 27 processes the response
whether the person is a Luciferian. For example, a person may 12b by determining the polarity of the response 12b of the
observe a test Subject during an objective test that includes person 10 to the second stimulus. Then, the first polarity and
stimuli and recording instrumentation, for signs that the test second polarity are compared to determine whether the first
Subjects responses were not genuine. Similarly, a person polarity or the second polarity has a greater value using algo
may look for signs of disingenuous responses during an inter rithm 27. The test of FIG. 17 comprises displaying as output
view with a test Subject conducted independently or in con 26 whetheraperson 10, determined to be a Luciferian, may be
junction with an orally administered questionnaire. Incorpo rehabilitated. The output 26 may include an expression of
rating a subjective evaluation of a test Subject may aid in the whether or not the person 10 may be rehabilitated.
determination of whether the subject is a Luciferian. 0070 A determination of whether a person 10 (pre-deter
0067. In accordance with FIG. 4, a person 10 is deter mined to be a Luciferian) may be rehabilitated may be made
mined to be a Luciferian if the polarity of the person 10 falls by a human being rather than by the algorithm 23 within the
within subspace 32. After determining that a person 10 is a computer 24, wherein the human being would utilize the
Luciferian, it is helpful to determine whether the person 10 same methodology as utilized by algorithm 23.
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

0071. The first stimulus may be a constructive stimulus or lus may be a movie clip of a murderer returning to the scene
a destructive stimulus. The second stimulus may be a con of a murder to relive the murder experience.
structive stimulus or a destructive stimulus. An example of 0074 An example of an unobvious stimulus may be an
constructive stimulus may include a movie clip of a person open page of a magazine showing a successful charity auction
rescuing animal from a fire. An example may be a picture of or a newspaper clipping hanging on a wall that praises an
a person feeding the poor. Another example of a constructive employee's successful performance. An example of an unob
stimulus may be a movie clip of a person assisting a falling vious stimulus may be a scene in a doorway where a person
person. An example could be a movie clip showing a crimi Smiles at an individual and then frowns at the individual as the
nal's confession to a crime for which another has wrongfully individual departs from the presence of the person. An
been convicted. A constructive stimulus could be a movie clip example of an unobvious stimulus may be a scene through a
of community clean-up efforts. A constructive stimulus may window of a person intentionally stepping on papers dropped
be a movie clip of a person, performing a musical composi by another.
tion. A constructive stimulus may be a movie clip of a person (0075 FIG. 17 shows algorithm 27, instrumentation 20,
showing respect for a clergy member. A constructive stimulus computer 24 and output 26. Algorithm 27 may record physi
may be a movie clip of a person working in a flower garden. ological responses 12a and 12b. Physiological response 12a
A constructive stimulus may be a tactile stimulus such as the may be an involuntary response oran unintentional response,
smell of fresh flowers. A constructive stimulus may be an under the assumption that physiological response 12a could
open page of a magazine showing a successful charity auc be used to infer the response of the person 10 to the first
tion. A constructive stimulus may be a newspaper clipping stimulus. Similarly, physiological response 12b may be an
hanging on a wall that praises an employee's successful per involuntary response or an unintentional response, under the
formance. assumption that physiological response 12b could be used to
0072 An example of a destructive stimulus may include a infer the response of the person 10 to the second stimulus.
movie clip or a picture that shows a person hiding in a house 0076 Algorithm 27 may determine the polarities of the
and waiting for a victim to arrive. Another example of a person 10 to the first stimulus and the first stimulus of the
destructive stimulus may be a movie clip or picture that shows responses 12a and 12b. The polarity of the response 12a and
a person hiding under another's bed. An example of a destruc the polarity of response 12b indicate whether the response
tive stimulus may be a movie clip or a picture that shows a 12a and response 12b are positive or negative. For example,
person, breaking a bathroom door with an occupied victim where the first polarity P-0, then the response 12a is positive.
inside the bathroom. An example of destructive stimuli may If the first polarity P<0, then the response 12a is negative. If
include a movie clip or a picture of a person breaking into a the first stimulus S is a destructive stimulus and the first
home, entering into the home and murdering a victim. An polarity P of response 12a is positive, the Luficerian gains
example of a destructive stimulus may be a movie clip show pleasure from the destructive stimulus. If the first stimulus S
ing a person buried alive. Other examples of destructive is a destructive stimulus and the first polarity P of response
stimuli may be a picture of dead animal, a picture of mutilated 12a is negative, the Luficerian does not gain pleasure from the
body of a female, a picture of human torso, a picture of a slit destructive stimulus. If the first stimulus S is a constructive
throat, a picture of a dissected body, a movie clip of a person stimulus and the first polarity P of response 12a is positive,
setting a fire, a picture of dungeon or basement, a movie clip the Luficerian gains pleasure from the constructive stimulus.
of a body in a duffle bag, a picture of a chemical used to If the first stimulus S is a constructive stimulus and the first
degrade a body, a picture of a poisonous Substance, a movie polarity P of response 12a is negative, the Luficerian does not
clip of a person using a Substance to render another uncon gain pleasure from the constructive stimulus.
scious, a movie clip of a child being brutally beaten, a movie 0077 Algorithm 27 determines whether a Luciferian may
clip of cooked human flesh, a movie clip of a person consum be rehabilitated. The output 26 indicates whether a Luciferian
ing another's blood or body parts, a movie clip of blood under may be rehabilitated. If the Luciferian is stimulated with a
a floor board, and a movie clip of blood seeping through plurality of constructive stimuli, and then a plurality of
carpet. destructive stimuli, and the polarity for the plurality of con
0073. A destructive stimulus may be an audio stimulus structive stimuli is greater than the polarity for the plurality of
Such as the Sound of gun fire. A destructive stimulus may be destructive stimuli, then algorithm 27 will express the result
a person destroying another's sand castle. A destructive that the Luciferian may be rehabilitated. If the Luciferian is
stimulus may be a rotten Smell. A destructive stimulus may be stimulated with a plurality of constructive stimuli, and then a
a movie clip of a person bragging about the murder of a plurality of destructive stimuli, and the polarity for the plu
person. A destructive stimulus may be a movie clip showing rality of constructive stimuli is less than the polarity for the
a person, who appears outwardly positive toward a victim but plurality of destructive stimuli, the algorithm 27 will express
inwardly is negative towards Such individual and the person is the result that it is unlikely the Luciferian may be rehabili
open to using any means to destroy the individual, including tated.
physically injuring the individual or damaging the individu (0078 FIG. 15 depicts a flow chart 90 for determining a
als property. A destructive stimulus may be a movie clip, humanity of a Luciferian. In step 91, a person 10 is stimulated
showing a person who lies and deceives an individual merely with a plurality of constructive stimuli (S.S.,..., S.). In step
because the person hates the individual. A destructive stimu 92, a physiological response to each constructive stimulus is
lus may be a scene through a window of a person intentionally recorded by the instrumentation 20. In step 93, the algorithm
stepping on papers dropped by another. A destructive stimu 27 determines a corresponding polarity (P. P. . . . . P) for
lus may be a scene in a doorway where a person Smiles at an each constructive stimulus. Then, the algorithm 27 compares
individual and then frowns at the individual as the individual the polarity of each constructive stimulus to determine the
departs from the presence of the person. A destructive stimu greatest value of polarity. The algorithm 27 determines a
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

humanity of the person 10 based on the constructive stimulus comparing said first polarity to said second polarity to
that yields the greatest value of polarity P. determine whether said second polarity has a greater
0079. In another aspect, FIG. 16 depicts a flow chart 100 value than said first polarity; and
for an alternative method of determining a humanity of a determining, from said comparing of said first polarity and
Luciferian. In step 101, a person 10 is stimulated with a said second polarity, whether said Luciferian can be
plurality of constructive stimuli and a plurality of destructive rehabilitated.
stimuli. In step 102, a physiological response to each stimulus 2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
is recorded by the instrumentation 20. In step 103, the algo consists of one stimulus component, wherein the Luciferians
rithm 27 determines a corresponding polarity for each con corresponding physiological response consists of one
structive stimulus and each destructive stimulus. In step 104, response component.
the algorithm 27 compares the polarity of each constructive 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one stimulus
stimulus to determine the greatest value of polarity for con comprises an N-component stimulus vector S1, S2, ..., S}
structive stimuli. In step 105, the algorithm 27 compares the such that N is at least 2, wherein the polarity of the Luciferi
polarity of each destructive stimulus to determine the greatest an’s corresponding physiological response to said at least one
value of polarity for a destructive stimulus. In step 106, the stimulus is an N-component polarity vector {P, P2, ..., P.
algorithm 27 compares the greatest value of polarity for the such that P. P. . . . . P respectively corresponds to S, S.
constructive stimulus to the greatest value of polarity for the , Sv.
destructive stimulus. In step 106, the algorithm 27 determines 4. The method of claim 3, wherein P. P. . . . P are
whether the greatest value of polarity for the constructive mutually independent.
stimulus is higher than the greatest value of polarity for the 5. The method of claim3, wherein one of P. P... ... Pyhas
destructive stimulus. According to step 107, if the greatest a dependence on another of P. P. . . . . P.
value of polarity for the constructive stimulus is higher the 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: representing
greatest value of polarity for the destructive stimulus, the a space in a first electronic dataset format;
algorithm 27 determines the humanity of the person 10 based 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: representing
on the constructive stimulus that yields the greatest value of a Subspace in a second electronic dataset format.
constructive stimulus. The algorithm 27 determines at least 8. The method of claim 1 wherein said first stimulus is
one humanity and the output 26 expresses the humanity. obvious or unobvious.
Thus, the algorithm 27 determines what gives the person 10 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said second stimulus is
more pleasure than destruction. After the humanity of the obvious or unobvious.
person 10 is determined, the humanity may be used to counsel 10. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one physiologi
the person 10. cal response to takes place in a variably controllable environ
ment.
0080. Alternatively, the algorithm 27 may determine
whether any values of polarities for constructive stimulus are 11. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
higher than the greatest value of polarity for the destructive comprises an event stream.
stimulus. The algorithm 27 may determine humanities of the 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the event stream is in
a real-time mode.
person 10 based on the constructive stimuli that yield polarity
values higher than the greatest value of polarity for the 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the event stream is in
destructive stimulus. a playback mode.
0081. While particular embodiments of the present inven 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the event stream is
tion have been described herein for purposes of illustration, selected from the group consisting of a movie, a play, a
many modifications and changes will become apparent to television performance, a sports event, a military event, and
combinations thereof.
those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims are 15. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
intended to encompass all such modifications and changes as comprises a visual stimulus.
fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention. All 16. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
embodiments heretofore described are predicted test results comprises an audio stimulus.
and prophetic examples and have not actually been con
ducted. 17. The process of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
comprises a tactile stimulus.
What is claimed is: 18. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
1. A method for determining whether a Luciferian can be comprises a multimedia stimulus.
rehabilitated, said method comprising: 19. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one stimulus
stimulating said Luciferian with a first stimulus; comprises a combination stimulus.
recording a first physiological response by said Luciferian 20. A method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian,
to said first stimulus; comprising:
determining, from said first physiological response, a first stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of constructive
polarity of said Luciferian's physiological response to stimuli;
said first stimulus; recording a physiological response by said Luciferian cor
responding to each constructive stimulus of said plural
stimulating said Luciferian with a second stimulus; ity of constructive stimuli:
recording a second physiological response by said Lucife determining, from each constructive stimulus, a corre
rian to said second stimulus; sponding polarity of the Luciferian's response for each
determining, from said second physiological response, a constructive stimulus to determine a greatest value; and
second polarity of said Luciferian's physiological determining, from said greatest value, a humanity of said
response to said second stimulus; Luciferian.
US 2013/028 1879 A1 Oct. 24, 2013

21. A method for determining a humanity of a Luciferian,

comprising:
stimulating said Luciferian with a plurality of destructive
stimuli;
recording a physiological response by said Luciferian cor
responding to each destructive stimulus of said plurality
of destructive stimuli;
determining, from each destructive stimulus, a correspond
ing polarity of the Luciferian's response for each
destructive stimulus to determine a least value; and
determining, from said least value, a humanity of said
Luciferian.