0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views8 pages

Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Systems: Modes

This document discusses two-degree-of-freedom systems. It describes how a simple mass-spring system with two masses and three springs can be modeled mathematically. The equations of motion are derived in matrix form. Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained by solving the eigenvalue problem. Initial conditions are used to determine the full solution. Rotational and damped two-degree-of-freedom systems are briefly introduced.

Uploaded by

Haydery
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views8 pages

Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Systems: Modes

This document discusses two-degree-of-freedom systems. It describes how a simple mass-spring system with two masses and three springs can be modeled mathematically. The equations of motion are derived in matrix form. Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained by solving the eigenvalue problem. Initial conditions are used to determine the full solution. Rotational and damped two-degree-of-freedom systems are briefly introduced.

Uploaded by

Haydery
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Systems

One-degree-of-freedom systems allow basic concepts, such as


frequency, damping, initial conditions, resonance and phase, etc.,
to be introduced and appreciated. However, real systems have
infinite number of degrees-of-freedom. On many occasions, these
systems can be approximated as having finite degrees-of-
freedom, the simplest of which has two degrees-of-freedom.
Multi-degrees-of-freedom systems afford a venue for
introducing eigenvectors (modes), matrices and vibration
absorption.

Free Vibration

A mass-spring system: k1 k2 k3
m1 m2

Free-body diagrams

x1 x2
k1x1 m1 k2(x1-x2) k2(x1-x2) m2 k3x2

Equations of motion

m1x1  k1 x1  k 2 ( x1  x2 ) m1x1  (k1  k 2 ) x1  k 2 x2  0


m2 x2  k3 x2  k 2 ( x1  x2 ) or m x  k x  (k  k ) x  0 (1)
2 2 2 1 2 3 2

1
In matrix form as

m1 0   x1  k1  k 2  k 2   x1  0


 0 m  x     k    x   0 (2)
 2  2   2 k 2 k 3  2   
or
Mx  Kx  0

Following the procedure for one-degree-of-freedom systems,


assume the solution in the form of

 x  a 
x   1    1  sin  t
 x2  a2 

This leads to

k  k  k2  2 1
m 0   a1  0
( 1 2      )    
  k 2 k 2  k3 
(3)
 0 m2  a2  0

The condition for a non-trivial solution of (K   2M)a  0 to exist is

k1  k2  m1 2  k2 
det  2
0 (4)
  k2 k2  k3  m2 
or
det(K   2M)  0 (5)
Notice  in equation (5) is the natural frequency (frequencies)
2
This is known in linear algebra as an (generalized) eigenvalue
problem. For matrices of very low orders (22, 33, 44), ‘hand’
calculation is feasible. For higher-orders matrices, suitable
algorithms and computer programs must be used.

For the above simple eigenvalue problem, the determinant


method gives (characteristic equation)

(k1  k2  m1 2 )( k2  k3  m2 2 )  k22  0


or
m1m2 4  [m1 (k2  k3 )  m2 (k1  k2 )] 2  k1k2  k1k3  k2 k3  0

This quadratic equation has two roots of 12 and  22 . Suppose


m1  m , m2  2m and k1  k2  k3  k . The above characteristic
equation become

2m 2 4  6mk 2  3k 2  0
k k
The two analytic solutions are 1  0.7962 m and 2  1.5382 m .

Equation (3) allows the ratio of the two amplitudes to be found as


a1 k 2k  2m 2
 
a2 2k  m 2 k
Substitution of one eigenvalue a time into equation (3) yields
(1) ( 2)
 a1   a1 
For 1 :  a   0.731 For 2 :  a   2.73
 2  2

3
Mode shapes

0.73 1 a1 1

a1 a2 a2
-2.73

Proportionality
A mode shape is represented by a vector, called eigenvector
mathematically. The absolute magnitude of individual elements
of an eigenvector is indefinite  an eigenvector multiplied by a
scalar is still an eigenvector. But the relative proportion of the
individual elements of an eigenvector is fixed. For this reason, an
eigenvector is normally normalized (scaled according to a rule)
and then becomes unique. Normalisation helps to graphically
display a mode, compare modes and facilitate computation.

Orthogonality
≠𝟎 𝒊=𝒌 ≠𝟎 𝒊=𝒌
𝐱 𝒊𝐓 𝐌𝐱 𝒌 = { 𝐱 𝒊𝐓 𝐊𝐱 𝒌 = {
=𝟎 𝒊≠𝒌 =𝟎 𝒊≠𝒌
Recall orthogonality between two vectors.

Normalisaton
(1) Let the maximum element be one and the other elements
xk
x   (k  1, 2, ......, n)
scaled as k
max ix
i

4
(2) Multiply a factor to an eigenvector so that x i Mx k  δ ik
T

(mass-normalisation)
 xi  1 .
2
(3) Scale an eigenvector so that i

A normalised eigenvector is called a normal eigenvector.


The two-degree-of-freedom system may vibrate in any one of
the two modes. In general, the motion of the system is a linear
combination of all modes as

(1) ( 2)
 x1 (t )  0.731  x1 (t )   2.73
   A1   sin( 0.796 t  1 )    A2   sin( 1.538 t  2 )
 x2 (t )  1   x2 (t )  1 

Factors A1 and A2, phase angles 1 and  2 , like in one-degree-of-


freedom systems, should be determined by the initial conditions.

Initial Conditions

For the linear system, given initial conditions as

 x1 (0)  2  x1 (0)  0


     and   
 x2 (0) 4  x2 (0) 0

Substituting them into

 x (t )  0.731  2.73
x(t )   1   A1   sin( 0.796 t  1 )  A2   sin( 1.538 t   2 )
 2 
x (t )  1   1 
leads to
5
2 0.731  2.73
   A1  sin 1  A2  sin  2
 
4  1   1 
0 0.731  2.73
   A 
1 1  cos 1  A 
2 2  cos  2
 
0  1   1 
The four unknowns can be determined and the solution is

 x (t )  2.732  0.732
x(t )   1     cos( 0.796 t )    cos(1.538 t )
 x2 (t ) 3.732  0.268 

x1(t)
0 x2(t)
0 10 20 30

-2

-4

For a system of n degrees-of-freedom, M and K are nn square


matrices. There usually exist n natural frequencies i and n
eigenvectors ψ i , by solving equation (5). The motion can be
written as
n
x(t )   Ai ψ i sin( it  i )
i 1

6
Rotational Systems

1 2 1 2

k1 k2 k3 k11 k2(1-2) k32

J1 J2 J1 J2

 J1 0  1   K1  K 2  K 2  1  0


 0 J        K   
K 2  K 3   2  0
 2   2   2

Coupled Pendulum

a
l

1 0 1  ka2  mgl  ka2  1  0 m m


          
2
ml 
     2  0
2 2
0 1  2   ka ka mgl

Two natural frequencies and modes can be found as


g g a2 k 1 1
1  , 2  2 2 ψ1    , ψ2   
l l l m 1  1

7
Damped Vibration

k1 k2 k3
m1 m2

m1 0   x1   c  c  x1  k1  k2  k2   x1  0


 0 m  x    c c   x     k    x   0
 2  2    2   2 k 2 k 3  2   
 x1 (t )   a1 
It is no longer valid to assume that  x (t )  a  sin t due to
 2   2
presence of damping. In general, the solution can be assumed as
 x1 (t )   a1 
     exp( t ) , where  is complex. This leads to
 2  a2 
x (t )

k  k  k2   c  c 2 m1 0   a1  0
( 1 2         )    
  k2 k 2  k3   c c   0 m2  a2  0
Suppose m1  m , m2  2m and k1  k2  k3  k . The above equation
becomes
2m 24  3cm3  6mk2  2ck  3k 2  0
k c
Introduce a new variable   m
, 
2m
,   z . A new equation
appears as
2 z 4  6z 3  6 z 2  4z  3  0
Two roots at   5% : z1, 2  0.0014  i0.80 ; z3, 4  0.0736  i1.54 ;
k k
eigenvalues: 1, 2  (0.0014  i0.80) m ; 3, 4  (0.0736  i1.54) m .

You might also like