The document discusses the incremental method for capital budgeting. It defines minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) as the rate an entity expects to earn on future investments based on its financial situation and opportunities. MARR is used to evaluate investment alternatives using incremental analysis, which considers mutually exclusive alternatives sequentially based on their incremental cash flows and rates of return compared to the next best alternative. The document provides an example comparing three investment alternatives X, Y and Z using their costs, cash flows, salvage values and incremental analysis to determine which alternative provides the highest return above MARR.
The document discusses the incremental method for capital budgeting. It defines minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) as the rate an entity expects to earn on future investments based on its financial situation and opportunities. MARR is used to evaluate investment alternatives using incremental analysis, which considers mutually exclusive alternatives sequentially based on their incremental cash flows and rates of return compared to the next best alternative. The document provides an example comparing three investment alternatives X, Y and Z using their costs, cash flows, salvage values and incremental analysis to determine which alternative provides the highest return above MARR.
The Minimum Attractive Rate of Return The Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR) is the rate at which an entity can always invest. MARR is set as the result of a policy decision by the entity, which represents the entity’s profit objective. MARR is set a based on entity’s view of future opportunities along its financial situation: MARR too low may allow proposal that is marginally productive or result in a loss. MARR too high may result in rejecting investment that would have good returns.
7-3 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Establishing MARR An entity (corporation) accumulates funds (capital) by means of two sources: debt financing, equity financing, or the mix of the two Debt financing refers to capital borrowed from other party that will be paid back at stated interest by a specific date. No direct risk involving the lender on repayment of funds and interest, or profits resulting from the funds (short, medium, long) terms loans, bonds, mortgage Capital financing represents capital owner by the corporation used to generate revenue. Sales of common or preferred stocks for public corporations Own money for private companies Retained earning
7-4 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Establishing MARR For capital budgeting and alternative evaluation MARR (the cost of capital) is set calculated independently for each type of financing The interest rate paid for (cost capital) for mixed financing is calculated from weighted proportion of source of financing Weighted Average Cost of Capital:
WACC = (equity fraction) x (cost of equity capital) +
(debt fraction) x (cost of debt capital) Example: A company is deciding to increase its capital in order to finance an alternative investment. With a 40-60 D-E mix with debt costing 8.5% and equity costing 10%, calculate WACC.
WACC = (40%)(8.5%) + (60%)(10%) = 9.4%
7-5 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Establishing MARR MARR is then set based on that cost, which reflects the view and/or preference of the entity (corporation) toward alternatives of investment The MARR varies from one alternative to another, because of: Project risk which should return higher that MARR Sensitivity of project area lowering MARR in one area may provide incentive to encourage investment in other area Tax structure tax adds to the reduction of net income Capital-financing method demand – supply for capital Rates used by other firms (competitors)
7-6 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Incremental Analysis With respects to MARR, where unlimited investment opportunities yielding return at the MARR is extended into the future, it can be assumed that the proceeds produced by the current investments can be invested at the minimum attractive rate of return. The decision for selection of alternatives is based on the analysis of the difference between mutually exclusive alternatives. The incremental investment analysis considers all feasible alternatives (that is yielding return > MARR), starting from the least cost investment.
7-7 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Incremental Analysis Fund of $ 1,500,000 is available for investment. MARR is set at 15% Alternative P: investment $ 1,000,000 @ 21% return Alternative Q: investment $ 1,400,000 @ 18% return Alternative R: investment $ 1,250,000 @ 20% return
Incremental ROR – Net Cash Flow Tabulation Rate of return can be calculated from cash flow tabulation of individual alternative. Selection of alternatives is done by sequential comparison of two alternatives, starting from the lowest to the next higher initial investment. For positive cash flow, start with “do nothing” alternative Net cash flow (difference between two cash flow) is to be used to calculate incremental ROR
Net cash flow = cash flow B - cash flow A = 0 iAB
7-9 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Incremental Investment: Net Cash Flow Tabulation
Cash Flow A Cash Flow B Cash Flow (B-A)
Initial cost - 125,000,000 - 157,750,000 -32,750,000 End of year 1 -9,800,000 +2,800,000 12,600,000 End of year 2 +21,750,000 +11,000,000 -10.750,000 End of year 3 +45,900,000 +65,500,000 19,600,000 End of year 3 +88,750,000 +82,750,000 -6,000,000 Salvage value +75,000,000 +95,000,000 20,000,000 PW C/F @ 10%
Higher initial cost
7-10 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Example Three alternatives investment are being considered at MARR 12% X Y Z Initial cost - 650,000,000 -540,000,000 -720,000,000 Yearly expenses - 135,000,000 -123,500,000 -130,000,000 Yearly revenues 330,000,000 321,000,000 357,500,000 Salvage value 45,000,000 52,000,000 202,000,000 period 5 5 5
Solution Y X Z comparison “do nothing” to Y Incremental cost, P -540,000,000 Incremental C/F, A 195,000,000 Incremental SV, SV 45,000,000 Present Worth C/F @ MARR Incremental i* Decision PWNet-C/F = -P + A(P/A, i*, 5) + SV(P/F, i*, 5) = 0 For i = 12% (P/A, 12, 5) = 3.6048 (P/F, 12, 5) = 0.5674 For i = 10% (P/A, 10, 5) = 3.7908 (P/F, 10, 5) = 0.6209 For i = 15% (P/A, 15, 5) = 3.3522 (P/F, 15, 5) = 0.4972
7-12 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Solution Y X Z comparison “do nothing” to Y Y to X Y to Z Incremental cost, P -540,000,000 -110,000,000 -180,000,000 Incremental C/F, A 195,000,000 2,500,000 32,500,000 Incremental SV, SV 45,000,000 7,000,000 157,000,000 Present Worth C/F @ MARR ? ? ? Incremental i* > 12% < 12% > 12% Decision Select Y RetainY Select Z PWNet-C/F = -P + A(P/A, i*, 5) + SV(P/F, i*, 5) = 0 For i = 12% (P/A, 12, 5) = 3.6048 (P/F, 12, 5) = 0.5674 For i = 10% (P/A, 10, 5) = 3.7908 (P/F, 10, 5) = 0.6209 For i = 15% (P/A, 15, 5) = 3.3522 (P/F, 15, 5) = 0.4972
7-13 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Homework #7 A ready-mix concrete producer is considering to install a new mixer system: Operating characteristics System A System B System C Installed cost ($) 2,250,000 2,950,000 2,750,000 Annual Operating cost ($) 320,000 495,000 401,500 Annual production (cm) 10,500 21,200 19,900 Unit price ($/cm) 122.50 122.50 122.50 Overhaul cost ($/ 2 years) 220,000 245,000 295,000 Salvage value ($) 221,500 308,000 367,500 Useful life (year) 4 6 6 a) develop net cash flow tabulation b) if the company has set MARR at 12%, which system should be installed? c) if all alternatives are to use MARR, will you recommend otherwise?