Acf
Acf
Acf
Atmospheric Corrections
Johannes Rickmann
Phenix Technologies
2014 IEEE PES Panel Session
Discussions on IEEE Std.4-2013: High-Voltage Testing
Techniques
2
a) Temperature t0 = 20 °C
b) Pressure b0 = 101.3 kPa (1013 mbar)
c) Absolute humidity h0 = 11 g/m3
3
K = k1k2
With k1 air density correction factor
k2 humidity correction factor
The air density correction factor k1 depends on the relative air density δ and can be
generally expressed as:
k1 = δm
Table 9 – Values of exponents, m for air density correction and w for humidity
correction, as a function of the parameter g
g m w
<0,2 0 0
>2,0 1,0 0
7
The curves where calculated for 550 kV equipment (3800 mm discharge path) and 245
kV equipment (2000 mm discharge path)
The actual atmospheric data was taken from the Chinese Standard DL/T620
Altitude
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
m
Relative air
1 0.945 0.888 0.835 0.786 0.741 0.695 0.655
pressure
Relative air
1 0.955 0.9085 0.865 0.824 0.784 0.745 0.708
density
Absolute
11 9.17 7.64 6.37 5.33 4.42 3.68 3.08
humidity h g/m3
Temperature
20 16.9 13.4 9.8 6.5 3.9 0.3 -1.9
°C
14
ACpeak level: 1047 kV (740 kV) ACpeak level: 651 kV (460 kV)
1.6% difference in correction factor when 7.2% difference in correction factor when
using actual data using actual data
17
ACrms to ACpeak
Correction factors calculated for peak and rms withstand voltage and discharge voltage
3800 – 740: rms withstand value for 3800 mm discharge path
3800 – 1047: peak withstand value for 3800 mm discharge path
3800 – 880: rms withstand value for 3800 mm discharge path
3800 – 1245: peak withstand value for 3800 mm discharge path
19
U 50 (i ) = 1.1xU t (i ) = 1.1xK t (i − 1) xU 0
The iteration is continued until
K t (i ) − K t ( −1) < predetermined value
20
Comparison of calculated correction factors for SI for a 3800 mm discharge path at withstand and
flashover using the converse procedure with and without the iterative procedure
The differences are about the same for AC but smaller for DC and almost negligible for LI
21
Where:
H is the altitude in m Where:
m is defined as 1 for LI and short m is defined as 1 for LI and short
duration AC test voltages and for SI m duration AC test voltages and 0.75 for
is to be calculated using the curves phase to ground SI
below
22
Comparison between calculated correction factors and those achieved through tests
[1] A. Pigini et.al: “Influence of Air Density and Humidity on the Breaakdown Voltage of Air Gaps, 33-83(WG03) 29
IWD”
[2] M. Ramirez et.al.: “Air Density Influence on the Strength of External Insulation under Positive Impulses:
Experimental Investigation up to an Altitude of 3000 m a.s.l.”, IEEE 1989
[3] Liao Yongli et.al.: “Switching Impulse strength of ±800 kV UHVDC Under High Altitude Condition”, High Voltage
Engineering, Vol 38, No12, December 31, 2012
IEC 60071-2: Insulation coordination – Part 2: Application guide
IEEE C37.100: DEFINITIONS FOR POWER SWITCHGEAR
IEEE48: TEST PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTERNATING-CURRENT CABLE TERMINATIONS USED ON
SHIELDED CABLES HAVING LAMINATED INSULATION RATED 2.5 KV THROUGH 765 KV OR EXTRUDED INSULATION
RATED 2.5 KV THROUGH 500 KV
23
• Due to the large differences in the results using the correction methods of different
standards a CIGRE working group was established within the CIGRE Study
Committee D1 (Materials and Emerging Test Techniques) and a joint IEC working
group JWG22
• D1.50: Atmospheric and altitude corrections factors for air gaps and clean insulators
– Members from Australia, Brazil, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Africa, Sweden, USA
– Tendency is going away from the simplified method having one m over g curve for various arrangements
– Tests at higher altitude suggest that the factor m is increasing again at higher altitudes