Stress Analysis 1
Stress Analysis 1
Revision - 01
February 2012
MoU MacDonald
MoU MacDonald
Revision No: 01
February 2012
Mott MacDonald, PO Box 587, AI Barami Building, Wadi Kabir. Ruwi, 112, Oman
T +968 2485 2000 F +968 2481 5850, www.mottmac.com
~
Engineering Services for Off Plot Deiivery Contract (ODC) - North Oman
Mott MacDonald
(~
OILLY
GIRISH RAMESH NANOHAKUMAR
01 11/02/2012 NARKHEOE Issued for Detail Design
(ONK)
(GRN)
(TA~
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this
document being relied upon by any other party, or being used
and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned
for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission
project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party Dr
which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by
used for any other purpose. other parties
Mott MacDonald . PO Box 587 , AI Barami Building , Wadi Kabir, Ruwi, 112. Oman
T +968 24852000 F +9682481 5850. www.mottmac.com
Mou MacDonald
Content
Chapter TitRe Page
1. Introduction 2
1.1 Project Background 2
1.2 Document Purpose 2
1.3 Abbreviations 2
2. Reference Documents 3
2.1 Standards and Specifications 3
4. Design Data 5
6. Load Cases 11
8. Wind Analysis 13
The South Oman Gas Une (SOGL) system transports gas for POO operations in Central and
South Oman. Gas is transported fram the Saih Nihayda area to places as far south as Marmul.
The gas transported via the (SOGL) is mainly used for power generation. Amount of gas are used
for station purging and blanketing gas. The current SOGL is formed by three pipeline segments
located between Saih Nihayda, Sahmah, Hubara and Marmul. The growth of power demand in
Central and South Oman requires new power plants and hence more gas. Based on May 2010
3
PB 11 data, POO gas consumption south of Saih Nihayda will increase fram 1.8-2.0 million m /day
3
to more than 4.0 million m /day by 2014. The SOGL system is unable to cope with this increase in
f10w and will run out of capacity by early 2013.
The objective of this project is to build a 20" gas pipeline fram the KP24.5 point in the SR CPP
(Barik) to BVS-08. Pipeline shall transport f1uids between Barik to BVS-08. This 20" pipeline shall
include pigging facility on each end.
The main objective of this document is to define the findings of the stresses & thermal loads
developed on the 20" SOGL loop line.
The Stresses & Thermal loads developed due to temperature, internai pressure, routing and
external loads are analysed by using CAESAR-II (PC based pipe stress analysis software
program) Version 5.10.
The piping network has been modelled as two separate systems consisting of Pig Launcher and
Pig Receiver respectively with buried portions applicable as per layout plan.
1.3 Abbreviations
cs Carbon Steel.
SP POO Specification
KP Kilometre Point
2. Reference Documents
.. To model the piping configuration matching with the actual conditions to extent possible including
the soit effect for the buried portion using the buried pipe modeller of CAESAR-II Version. 5.10.
" To analyze the induced stresses in the system due to temperature, soit friction and sustained loads
like pressure and weight.
.. To interpret the results with the requirements of ASME 831.3 & ASME 831.8 and good engineering
practice.
" Ta identify the high stressed sections and take required engineering measures wherever the
stresses are exceeding the code limits.
" Ta verify the loads at critical support points (su ch as line stop and guide) and use the loading data
for support design.
.. Ta minimize induced nozzle loads Pig Launcher and Pig Receiver nozzles and to submit the nozzle
loading data ta vendor for qualification.
• Temperature of 82°C and -10°C are shutdown temperatures and hence atmospheric pressure has
been included along with in stress analysis. These parameters are used in load case 2 & 4.
• Based on Basis of Design Report the operating temperature for the pipeline system is 50°C. The
same has been used in stress analysis input as T2.
3
• Density for Dry gas has been assumed as 300 Kg/m .
• The effect of friction has been calculated based on steel to soil friction factor of 0.45 for buried
section and a friction factor of 0.3 has been used for steel to steel.
.. Soil data: ln the absence of soil investigation report, a conservative dense sandy material
assumed for ail stress systems as per the table mentioned below:
Based on the stress analysis performed the following stresses are verified with respect to the
requirements given in ASME B31.3/ B31.8
ASME B31.3
The ASME pressure piping code B31.3 recognizes that stress due to thermal expansion tends to
diminish with time as a result of local yielding or creep. This reduction of stress will appear as a
stress of opposite sign in the cold condition. Cold springing is similar, and although hot stresses
tend to diminish with time, the sum of hot and cold stresses for any one cycle will remain
practically constant. This sum is called the stress range, and the code for pressure piping defines
this allowable expansion stress range established for thermal expansion in terms of hot and cold S
values as:
The stress due to thermal expansion, which must not exceed the allowable expansion range, is
called expansion stress and is defined as:
The sum of the longitudinal stresses due to pressure, weight and other sustained external
loadings shall not exceed Sh. If the longitudinal stresses due to sustained loadings are less than Sh,
the code permits the unused portion to be applied to extend the stress range available for
expansion effects. Therefore the code, in effect, permits a total equal to 1.25(Sc+ Sh) for thermal
expansion stress combined with stresses from other sustained loadings.
The stress analysis results were used to check the loads acting on the proposed line stops
and guides to ensure that they are within the practicallimits.
ASME 831.8
Restrained pipe
ST = Ea(T1-T2)
Where
=
E the elastic modulus, at the ambient temperature
=
Ti the pipe temperature at the time of installation, tie-in, or burial.
=
T2 the warmest or coldest pipe operating temperature.
=
a the coefficient of thermal expansion.
d) The normal bending stress in straight pipe or large-radius bends due to weight or other
external loads is
SB= M/Z
Where
M = the bending moment across the pipe cross section.
Z = the pipe section modulus.
e) The nominal bending stress in fitting and components due to weight or other external load is
Where MR is the resultant intensified moment across the fitting or component. The
Resultant moment shall be calculated as
Where
Mi = in-plane bending moment.
=
Mt torsional moment.
Mo = out-of-plane bending moment.
ii = in-plane stress intensification factor.
io = out-of-plane stress intensification factor.
The product 0.75i ;:: 0.1
Sx = RIA
where
=
A pipe cross-section area.
R = external force axial component
=
SL Sp + ST + Sx + SB
Note that SL, ST, Sx, or SB can have negative values.
The maximum permitted valve of 1 SL 1 is 0.9 ST, where S is the specified minimum yield
strength, psi
Temp OF
Temp. Derating factor, T
:5
250 1.00
300 0.967
350 0.933
400 0.900
450 0.867
The combined biaxial stress state of the pipeline in the operating mode is evaluated using
The calculation in either (1) or (2) below:
1 SH - Sd or
2 2
[ SL -SL SH + SH ]1/2
The maximum permitted value for the combined biaxial stress is kST
Where
S is the Specified minimum yield strength
T is the temperature derating factor and k is defined as below
(a) For loads of long duration, the value of k shall not exceed 0.90
(b) For occasional non-periodic load of short duration, the value of k shaH not exceed 1.0
The biaxial stress evaluation described above applies only to straight sections of pipe
(b) The maximum permitted longitudinal stress in unrestrained pipe is SL :5 0.75ST, where S
is the specified minimum yield strength.
ln absence of the soil data the stress analysis of the underground pipeline is solely based on the
procedure given in CAESAR Il manual which refers to the idea presented by L.C. Peng in his
paper entitled "Stress Analysis Method for underground pipelines," published in Pipeline Industry
otherwise soil model should be prepared. Soil supports shall be modelled as bi-linear springs
having an initial stiffness, an ultimate load & yield stiffness.
VERTICAL UPLlFT:
Puu = Nqv * V * H * 0
Where:
Puu = Ultimate vertical uplift resistance of the buried pipeline
=
Nqv Vertical uplift factor for sand (function of <1:> )
V =Unit weight of the sand backfill
H = Oepth from ground surface to "spring Une" of buried pipeline
o = Outside diameter of the Pipeline
The displacement corresponding to Vertical uplift, Yuu is given as
Y uu = 0.015H for loose sands
=
0.01 OH for dense sands
VERTICAL BEARING
TRANSVERSE LATERAL
=
PUL Nqh * V * H * 0 .................................. (For sand)
Where:
PUL = Ultimate transverse Lateral resistance
Inch = Lateral Bearing capacity factor (function of <1:»
V = Unit weight of the sand backfill
H = Oepth fram ground surface to "spring Une" of buried pipeline
=
o Outside diameter of the Pipeline
The displacement, Y UL , required to mobilize the ultimate transverse lateral soil resistance is
related to the soil density & burial depth from ground surface.
PUA =
J..l (2 VOc + W p)
Where:
PUA = Ultimate longitudinal axial resistance for buried pipeline
=
J..l Co-efficient of friction between pipe and soil
V = Unit weight of the sand backfill
=
o Outside diameter of the Pipeline
The stress analysis results were used to check the loads acting on the proposed line stops and
guides to ensure that they are within the practical limits.
The stress analysÎs was performed to protect the above ground stations from stresses and loads
developed due to thermal expansion along the pipeline.
The displacement values of the critical points were verified from the stress analysÎs to ensure that
the proposed pipeline and related on-plot piping configuration remains stable in the design and
operating conditions.
The stress analysis results were used to check the loads acting on the proposed line stops
and guides to ensure that they are within the practicallimits.
The displacement values of the critical points were verified from the stress analysis to
ensure that the proposed pipeline configuration remains stable in the design and operating
conditions.
CAESAR Il Ver. 5.10 calculates the stress, displacement and load conditions for the design.
The CAESAR Input & Output reports for each case are atlached in Appendix B.
Legends
7. Seismic Analysis
Seismic Analysis has been ignored in this stress analysis.
CI The stress analysis has been carried out using CAESAR-II Version 5.10.
CI The detailed output reports are given as Appendix B of this report.
e The principal output parameters are summarized in this section for ready
reference.
CI The maximum stress ratios of each model are:
Stress ratios
Max.Operating
Stress System. Sustained Remarks
condition
Value % Node Value % Node
Pig Launcher 92.8 3801 45.3 5060 Acceptable
Pig Receiver 80.6 7148 80.5 7148 Acceptable