Research Concepts

Agenda
Research Basics
What research is and is not
Where research comes from
Research deliverables

Methodologies
Research process
Quantitative versus qualitative research

Questions
Research Basics
What research is and isn’t
Research characteristics
Research projects and pitfalls
Sources of research projects
Elements of research proposals
Literature reviews
What Research Is Not
Research isn’t information gathering:
Gathering information from resources such books
or magazines isn’t research.
No contribution to new knowledge.

Research isn’t the transportation of facts:

Merely transporting facts from one resource to
another doesn’t constitute research.
No contribution to new knowledge although this
might make existing knowledge more accessible.
What Research Is
Research is:

“…the systematic process of collecting and

analyzing information (data) in order to increase
our understanding of the phenomenon about
which we are concerned or interested.”1
Research Characteristics
1. Originates with a question or problem.
2. Requires clear articulation of a goal.
3. Follows a specific plan or procedure.
4. Often divides main problem into subproblems.
5. Guided by specific problem, question, or
hypothesis.
6. Accepts certain critical assumptions.
7. Requires collection and interpretation of data.
8. Cyclical (helical) in nature.
Research Projects
Research begins with a problem.
This problem need not be Earth-shaking.

Identifying this problem can actually be the

hardest part of research.
In general, good research projects should:
Address an important question.
Advance knowledge.
Research Project Pitfalls
The following kinds of projects usually don’t
make for good research:
Self-enlightenment.
Comparing data sets.
Correlating data sets.
Problems with yes / no answers.
High-Quality Research
(1 of 2)
Good research requires:
The scope and limitations of the work to be clearly
defined.
The process to be clearly explained so that it can
be reproduced and verified by other researchers.
A thoroughly planned design that is as objective
as possible.
High-Quality Research
(2 of 2)
Good research requires:
Highly ethical standards be applied.
All limitations be documented.
Data be adequately analyzed and explained.
All findings be presented unambiguously and all
conclusions be justified by sufficient evidence.
Sources of Research Problems
Observation.
Literature reviews.
Professional conferences.
Experts.
Stating the Research Problem
Once you’ve identified a research problem:
State that problem clearly and completely.
Determine the feasibility of the research.
Identify subproblems:
Completely researchable units.
Small in number.
Add up to the total problem.
Must be clearly tied to the interpretation of the
data.
Hypotheses
Hypotheses are tentative, intelligent guesses
as to the solution of the problem.
There is often a 1-1 correspondence between a
subproblem and a hypothesis.
Hypotheses can direct later research activities
since they can help determine the nature of the
research and methods applied.
Delimitations
All research has limitations and thus certain
work that will not be performed.
The work that will not be undertaken is
described as the delimitations of the
research.
Definitions
Define each technical term as it is used in
relation to your research project.
This helps remove significant ambiguity from the
research itself by ensuring that reviewers, while
they may not agree with your definitions, at least
know what you’re talking about.
Assumptions
Assumptions are those things that the
researcher is taking for granted.
For example: a given test instrument accurately
and consistently measures the phenomenon in
question.

As a general rule you’re better off

documenting an assumption than ignoring it.
Overlooked assumptions provide a prime source
of debate about a research project’s results.
Importance of the Study
Many research problems have a kind of
theoretical feel about them. Such projects
often need to be justified:
What is the research project’s practical value?

Without this justification, it will prove difficult

to convince others that the problem in
question is worth study.
Research Proposals
Research proposals are documents that
describe the intended research including:
Problem and sub problems.
Hypotheses.
Delimitations.
Definitions.
Assumptions.
Importance.
Literature review.
Literature Review
A literature review is a necessity.
Without this step, you won’t know if your problem
has been solved or what related research is
already underway.
When performing the review:
Start searching professional journals.
Begin with the most recent articles you can find.
Keep track of relevant articles in a bibliography.
Don’t be discouraged if work on the topic is
already underway.
Literature Review Pitfalls
(1 of 2)
Be very careful to check your sources when
doing your literature review.
Many trade magazines are not peer
reviewed.
Professional conferences and journals often have
each article reviewed by multiple people before it
is even recommended for publication.
The IEEE and ACM digital libraries are good
places to start looking for legitimate research.
Literature Review Pitfalls
(2 of 2)
The Internet can be a good source of
information. It is also full of pseudo-science
and poor research.
Make sure you verify the claims of any
documentation that has not been peer
reviewed by other professionals in the
computing industry.
Processes & Methodologies
Research Process.
Common Methodologies.
Methodology Comparison.
Research Process
Research is an extremely cyclic process.
Later stages might necessitate a review of earlier
work.

This isn’t a weakness of the process but is

part of the built-in error correction machinery.
Because of the cyclic nature of research, it
can be difficult to determine where to start
and when to stop.
Step 1: A Question Is Raised
A question occurs to or is posed to the
researcher for which that researcher has no
answer.
This doesn’t mean that someone else doesn’t
already have an answer.

The question needs to be converted to an

appropriate problem statement like that
documented in a research proposal.
Step 2: Suggest Hypotheses
The researcher generates intermediate
hypotheses to describe a solution to the
problem.
This is at best a temporary solution since there is
as yet no evidence to support either the
acceptance or rejection of these hypotheses.
Step 3: Literature Review
The available literature is reviewed to
determine if there is already a solution to the
problem.
Existing solutions do not always explain new
observations.
The existing solution might require some revision
or even be discarded.
Step 4: Literature Evaluation
It’s possible that the literature review has
yielded a solution to the proposed problem.
This means that you haven’t really done research.

On the other hand, if the literature review

turns up nothing, then additional research
activities are justified.
Step 5: Acquire Data
The researcher now begins to gather data
relating to the research problem.
The means of data acquisition will often change
based on the type of the research problem.
This might entail only data gathering, but it could
also require the creation of new measurement
instruments.
Step 6: Data Analysis
The data that were gathered in the previous
step are analyzed as a first step in
ascertaining their meaning.
As before, the analysis of the data does not
constitute research.
This is basic number crunching.
Step 7: Data Interpretation
The researcher interprets the newly analyzed
data and suggests a conclusion.
This can be difficult.
Keep in mind that data analysis that suggests a
correlation between two variables can’t
automatically be interpreted as suggesting
causality between those variables.
Step 8: Hypothesis Support
The data will either support the hypotheses or
they won’t.
This may lead the researcher to cycle back to an
earlier step in the process and begin again with a
new hypothesis.
This is one of the self-correcting mechanisms
associated with the scientific method.
Common Methodologies
Methodologies are high-level approaches to
conducting research.
The individual steps within the methodology might
vary based on the research being performed.

Two commonly used research

methodologies:
Quantitative.
Qualitative.
Methodology Comparison
Quantitative Qualitative
Explanation, prediction Explanation, description
Test theories Build theories
Known variables Unknown variables
Large sample Small sample
Standardized instruments Observations, interviews
Deductive Inductive
References
1. Leedy P. D. and Ormrod J. E., Practical Research:
Planning and Design, 7th Edition. 2001.
Useful Websites
http://computer.org
http://www.acm.org
Questions?