0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views1 page

Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division

This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.

Uploaded by

Jayvee Balino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views1 page

Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division

This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.

Uploaded by

Jayvee Balino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Republic of the Philippines

SUPREME COURT
Manila

FIRST DIVISION

G.R. No. 176697 September 10, 2014

CESAR V. AREZA and LOLITA B. AREZA, Petitioners,


vs.
EXPRESS SAVINGS BANK, INC. and MICHAEL POTENCIANO, Respondnets.

You might also like