Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division
This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views1 page
Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division
This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.
G.R. No. 183204, January 13, 2014 - THE METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ANA GRACE ROSALES AND YO YUK TO, Respondents. _ JANUARY 2014 - PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE - CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY