Scribd
Upload
243 views

Collision Resolution Techniques

This document discusses collision resolution techniques for hash tables using open addressing, including quadratic probing, double hashing, and rehashing. It provides examples and pseudocode for implementing these techniques. Specifically, it covers: 1) Quadratic probing and double hashing algorithms to handle collisions in open addressing hash tables by probing to subsequent index locations using quadratic or secondary hash functions. 2) How double hashing eliminates both primary and secondary clustering through the use of a second hash function. 3) Rehashing the table by doubling the size and reinserting all elements when the table becomes too full. 4) Pseudocode for implementing open addressing hash tables using these collision resolution techniques.

Uploaded by

vvsprasad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
243 views

Collision Resolution Techniques

This document discusses collision resolution techniques for hash tables using open addressing, including quadratic probing, double hashing, and rehashing. It provides examples and pseudocode for implementing these techniques. Specifically, it covers: 1) Quadratic probing and double hashing algorithms to handle collisions in open addressing hash tables by probing to subsequent index locations using quadratic or secondary hash functions. 2) How double hashing eliminates both primary and secondary clustering through the use of a second hash function. 3) Rehashing the table by doubling the size and reinserting all elements when the table becomes too full. 4) Pseudocode for implementing open addressing hash tables using these collision resolution techniques.

Uploaded by

vvsprasad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Collision Resolution: Open Addressing

• Quadratic Probing

• Double Hashing

• Rehashing

• Algorithms for:
– insert
– find
– withdraw

1
Open Addressing: Quadratic Probing
• Quadratic probing eliminates primary clusters.
• c(i) is a quadratic function in i of the form c(i) = a*i2 + b*i. Usually c(i) is chosen
as:
c(i) = i2 for i = 0, 1, . . . , tableSize – 1
or
c(i) = ±i2 for i = 0, 1, . . . , (tableSize – 1) / 2

• The probe sequences are then given by:


hi(key) = [h(key) + i2] % tableSize for i = 0, 1, . . . , tableSize – 1
or
hi(key) = [h(key) ± i2] % tableSize for i = 0, 1, . . . , (tableSize – 1) / 2

• Note for Quadratic Probing:


¾ Hashtable size should not be an even number; otherwise Property 2 will not be
satisfied.
¾ Ideally, table size should be a prime of the form 4j+3, where j is an integer. This
choice of table size guarantees Property 2. 2
Quadratic Probing (cont’d)
• Example: Load the keys 23, 13, 21, 14, 7, 8, and 15, in this order,
in a hash table of size 7 using quadratic probing with c(i) = ±i2 and
the hash function: h(key) = key % 7
• The required probe sequences are given by:
hi(key) = (h(key) ± i2) % 7 i = 0, 1, 2, 3

3
Quadratic Probing (cont’d)
h0(23) = (23 % 7) % 7 = 2 hi(key) = (h(key) ± i2) % 7 i = 0, 1, 2, 3
h0(13) = (13 % 7) % 7 = 6
h0(21) = (21 % 7) % 7 = 0
h0(14) = (14 % 7) % 7 = 0 collision
0 O 21
h1(14) = (0 + 12) % 7 = 1
h0(7) = (7 % 7) % 7 = 0 collision
h1(7) = (0 + 12) % 7 = 1 collision 1 O 14
h-1(7) = (0 - 12) % 7 = -1
NORMALIZE: (-1 + 7) % 7 = 6 collision 2 O 23
h2(7) = (0 + 22) % 7 = 4
h0(8) = (8 % 7)%7 = 1 collision 3 O 15
h1(8) = (1 + 12) % 7 = 2 collision
h-1(8) = (1 - 12) % 7 = 0 collision 4 O 7
h2(8) = (1 + 22) % 7 = 5
h0(15) = (15 % 7)%7 = 1 collision 5 O 8
h1(15) = (1 + 12) % 7 = 2 collision
h-1(15) = (1 - 12) % 7 = 0 collision 6 O 13
2
h2(15) = (1 + 2 ) % 7 = 5 collision
h-2(15) = (1 - 22) % 7 = -3
NORMALIZE: (-3 + 7) % 7 = 4 collision 4
h3(15) = (1 + 32)%7 = 3
Secondary Clusters
• Quadratic probing is better than linear probing because it eliminates primary
clustering.
• However, it may result in secondary clustering: if h(k1) = h(k2) the probing
sequences for k1 and k2 are exactly the same. This sequence of locations is called
a secondary cluster.
• Secondary clustering is less harmful than primary clustering because secondary
clusters do not combine to form large clusters.
• Example of Secondary Clustering: Suppose keys k0, k1, k2, k3, and k4 are
inserted in the given order in an originally empty hash table using quadratic
probing with c(i) = i2. Assuming that each of the keys hashes to the same array
index x. A secondary cluster will develop and grow in size:

5
Double Hashing
• To eliminate secondary clustering, synonyms must have different probe sequences.

• Double hashing achieves this by having two hash functions that both depend on the
hash key.

• c(i) = i * hp(key) for i = 0, 1, . . . , tableSize – 1


where hp (or h2) is another hash function.

• The probing sequence is:


hi(key) = [h(key) + i*hp(key)]% tableSize for i = 0, 1, . . . , tableSize – 1

• The function c(i) = i*hp(r) satisfies Property 2 provided hp(r) and tableSize are
relatively prime.

• To guarantee Property 2, tableSize must be a prime number.

• Common definitions for hp are :


¾ hp(key) = 1 + key % (tableSize - 1)
¾ hp(key) = q - (key % q) where q is a prime less than tableSize
¾ hp(key) = q*(key % q) where q is a prime less than tableSize
6
Double Hashing (cont'd)
Performance of Double hashing:
– Much better than linear or quadratic probing because it eliminates both primary
and secondary clustering.
– BUT requires a computation of a second hash function hp.

Example: Load the keys 18, 26, 35, 9, 64, 47, 96, 36, and 70 in this order, in an
empty hash table of size 13
(a) using double hashing with the first hash function: h(key) = key % 13 and the
second hash function: hp(key) = 1 + key % 12
(b) using double hashing with the first hash function: h(key) = key % 13 and
the second hash function: hp(key) = 7 - key % 7
Show all computations.

7
Double Hashing (cont’d)

h0(18) = (18%13)%13 = 5 hi(key) = [h(key) + i*hp(key)]% 13


h0(26) = (26%13)%13 = 0 h(key) = key % 13
h0(35) = (35%13)%13 = 9
h0(9) = (9%13)%13 = 9 collision hp(key) = 1 + key % 12
hp(9) = 1 + 9%12 = 10
h1(9) = (9 + 1*10)%13 = 6
h0(64) = (64%13)%13 = 12
h0(47) = (47%13)%13 = 8
h0(96) = (96%13)%13 = 5 collision
hp(96) = 1 + 96%12 = 1
h1(96) = (5 + 1*1)%13 = 6 collision
h2(96) = (5 + 2*1)%13 = 7
h0(36) = (36%13)%13 = 10
h0(70) = (70%13)%13 = 5 collision
hp(70) = 1 + 70%12 = 11
h1(70) = (5 + 1*11)%13 = 3
8
Double Hashing (cont'd)

h0(18) = (18%13)%13 = 5 hi(key) = [h(key) + i*hp(key)]% 13


h0(26) = (26%13)%13 = 0 h(key) = key % 13
h0(35) = (35%13)%13 = 9
h0(9) = (9%13)%13 = 9 collision hp(key) = 7 - key % 7
hp(9) = 7 - 9%7 = 5
h1(9) = (9 + 1*5)%13 = 1
h0(64) = (64%13)%13 = 12
h0(47) = (47%13)%13 = 8
h0(96) = (96%13)%13 = 5 collision
hp(96) = 7 - 96%7 = 2
h1(96) = (5 + 1*2)%13 = 7
h0(36) = (36%13)%13 = 10
h0(70) = (70%13)%13 = 5 collision
hp(70) = 7 - 70%7 = 7
h1(70) = (5 + 1*7)%13 = 12 collision
h2(70) = (5 + 2*7)%13 = 6
9
Rehashing
• As noted before, with open addressing, if the hash tables become
too full, performance can suffer a lot.
• So, what can we do?
• We can double the hash table size, modify the hash function, and
re-insert the data.
– More specifically, the new size of the table will be the first
prime that is more than twice as large as the old table size.

10
Implementation of Open Addressing
public class OpenScatterTable extends AbstractHashTable {
protected Entry array[];
protected static final int EMPTY = 0;
protected static final int OCCUPIED = 1;
protected static final int DELETED = 2;

protected static final class Entry {


public int state = EMPTY;
public Comparable object;
// …
}

public OpenScatterTable(int size) {


array = new Entry[size];
for(int i = 0; i < size; i++)
array[i] = new Entry();
}
// …
}

11
Implementation of Open Addressing (Con’t.)
/* finds the index of the first unoccupied slot
in the probe sequence of obj */
protected int findIndexUnoccupied(Comparable obj){
int hashValue = h(obj);
int tableSize = getLength();
int indexDeleted = -1;
for(int i = 0; i < tableSize; i++){
int index = (hashValue + c(i)) % tableSize;
if(array[index].state == OCCUPIED
&& obj.equals(array[index].object))
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Error: Duplicate key");
else if(array[index].state == EMPTY ||
(array[index].state == DELETED &&
obj.equals(array[index].object)))
return indexDeleted ==-1?index:indexDeleted;
else if(array[index].state == DELETED &&
indexDeleted == -1)
indexDeleted = index;
}
if(indexDeleted != -1) return indexDeleted;
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Error: Hash table is full");
}
12
Implementation of Open Addressing (Con’t.)
protected int findObjectIndex(Comparable obj){
int hashValue = h(obj);
int tableSize = getLength();

for(int i = 0; i < tableSize; i++){


int index = (hashValue + c(i)) % tableSize;
if(array[index].state == EMPTY
|| (array[index].state == DELETED
&& obj.equals(array[index].object)))
return -1;
else if(array[index].state == OCCUPIED
&& obj.equals(array[index].object))
return index;
}
return -1;
}

public Comparable find(Comparable obj){


int index = findObjectIndex(obj);
if(index >= 0)return array[index].object;
else return null; 13
}
Implementation of Open Addressing (Con’t.)
public void insert(Comparable obj){
if(count == getLength()) throw new ContainerFullException();
else {
int index = findIndexUnoccupied(obj);
// throws exception if an UNOCCUPIED slot is not found
array[index].state = OCCUPIED;
array[index].object = obj;
count++;
}
}

public void withdraw(Comparable obj){


if(count == 0) throw new ContainerEmptyException();
int index = findObjectIndex(obj);
if(index < 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Object not found");
else {
array[index].state = DELETED;
// lazy deletion: DO NOT SET THE LOCATION TO null
count--;
}
} 14
Exercises
1. If a hash table is 25% full what is its load factor?

2. Given that,
c(i) = i2,
for c(i) in quadratic probing, we discussed that this equation
does not satisfy Property 2, in general. What cells are missed by
this probing formula for a hash table of size 17? Characterize
using a formula, if possible, the cells that are not examined by
using this function for a hash table of size n.

3. It was mentioned in this session that secondary clusters are less


harmful than primary clusters because the former cannot combine
to form larger secondary clusters. Use an appropriate hash table
of records to exemplify this situation.
15

You might also like