Descriptive Title Written
Descriptive Title Written
DOI 10.5195/LEDGER.201X.X
Abstract. The abstract should be written in 10 pt. Times New Roman font, 13 pt. line
spacing, and 1.2 cm indenting on either side. Give a concise summary of the paper in a single
paragraph of approximately 150 words (200 words max). The abstract should communicate
both what the paper is about and the important results obtained. The abstract should contain
neither references nor non-plain text elements such as equations or compute code.
KEY WORDS
1. First key word. 2. Second key word. 3. Same style as abstract. 4. Not
more than two lines of keywords.
pilcrow [ ] for the authors affiliations. If more footnotes are required, use the pattern: [ ], [ , , , , , , , , . . . ].
LEDGER VOL X (201X) 1-5
followed by an em dash.
c Figure captions less than one line in length should be centered while multi-line captions should be justified.
2.4. Numbered and bulleted listsAuthors are encouraged to use lists to improve the
readability of information best presented in point form. The requirements are as follows.
(1) The line marker is indented 0.6 cm.
(2) The list item is further indented 0.6 cm (1.2 cm) in total.
(3) If the item is longer than a single line, the text on wrapping lines must begin at an
indentation of 1.2 cm, and the line spacing must be consistent with the body of the text.
(4) If the list is ordinal, the numbers (or letters) must be surrounded by round brackets.
(5) For non-ordinal lists, use small round dots as markers.
Fig. 1. This is an example of an acceptable plot. The axes are clearly labeled, 8 pt. Arial font
is used, gridlines are faint (1/4 pt.), the plot frame is slightly thicker (1/2 pt. black) and the
plotted data heavier still (1 pt.). In this example, gray scaling is used to differentiate between
the two time series.
3. Conclusion
For papers that do not follow a conventional structure, synthesize and summarize the main results
of the paper. This section is also an appropriate place to clarify the limitations of the work, as
well as to describe new research questions that arose. The conclusion section for papers that
follow a conventional structure (i.e., Methods, Results, Discussion) may be very short because
the synthesis of the results usually occurs in the Discussion section. The Conclusion and the
Introduction should be the two sections of your paper most accessible to an interdisciplinary
readership.
Acknowledgement
Acknowledge people who helped carry out the research or prepare the manuscript but whose
contribution did not warrant authorship. List funders and other sources of financial support at the
end of this section.
Author Contributions
State the contribution made by each author. Refer to authors using their initials, for example,
FAA developed the code to perform the simulation (65%) and SBA analyzed the results (35%).
They both contributed equally to manuscript preparation.
Conflict of Interest
State any potential conflict of interest here, again referring to authors using their initials. Although
assessing whether a conflict of interest exists can be difficult, as a guideline consider whether it
would be embarrassing should the potential conflict become publicly known. This section may
be omitted if no conflict of interest exists.
org/bitcoin.pdf
Appendix G: Calculations
Relegate to an appendix material that would distract from the flow of the article, but that is
required to rigorously prove claims made or concepts introduced in the papers body.