Scribd
Upload
180 views2 pages

Minoru Fujiki Vs Maria Paz Galela Marinay G. R. No. 196049 June 26, 2013

Minoru Fujiki, a Japanese national, petitioned a Philippine regional trial court to recognize a Japanese family court judgment declaring his wife Maria Paz Galela Marinay's second marriage bigamous and void. The trial court dismissed the petition, finding that the rules for nullifying marriages did not apply. However, the Supreme Court held that those rules do not apply to recognizing foreign judgments relating to marriage status where one party is foreign. It also found that bigamous marriages are considered void under Philippine law. The Court thus allowed Fujiki to prove the existence of the Japanese judgment in accordance with evidentiary rules.

Uploaded by

Mary Grace Caguioa Agas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
180 views2 pages

Minoru Fujiki Vs Maria Paz Galela Marinay G. R. No. 196049 June 26, 2013

Minoru Fujiki, a Japanese national, petitioned a Philippine regional trial court to recognize a Japanese family court judgment declaring his wife Maria Paz Galela Marinay's second marriage bigamous and void. The trial court dismissed the petition, finding that the rules for nullifying marriages did not apply. However, the Supreme Court held that those rules do not apply to recognizing foreign judgments relating to marriage status where one party is foreign. It also found that bigamous marriages are considered void under Philippine law. The Court thus allowed Fujiki to prove the existence of the Japanese judgment in accordance with evidentiary rules.

Uploaded by

Mary Grace Caguioa Agas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Minoru Fujiki vs Maria Paz Galela Marinay

G. R. No. 196049
June 26, 2013

Facts

Petitioner Minoru Fujiki (Fujiki) is a Japanese national who married respondent Maria Paz
Galela Marinay (Marinay) in the Philippines on Januuary 23, 2004. The marriage did not sit well and
eventually, they lost contact with each other. In 2008, Marinay met another Japanese. Without the first
marriage being dissolved, they were married in Quezon City. Their marriage did not work out as Marinay
allegedly suffered physical abuse from her husband. Fujiki and Marinay met in Japan and they were able
to reestablish their relationship. In 2010, Fujiki helped Marinay obtain a judgment from a family court in
Japan which declared the marriage between Marinay and Maekara void on the ground of bigamy. On
January 14, 2011, Fujiki filed a petition in the RTC entitled: "Judicial Recognition of Foreign Judgment (or
Decree of Absolute Nullity of Marriage)." Fujiki prayed that the Japanese Family Court judgment be
recognized. The RTC immediately issued an Order dismissing the petition based on improper venue and
lack of personality of the petitioner as provided in the provisions of the Rule on Declaration of Absolute
Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages (A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC). Fujiki moved
that the Order be reconsidered on the ground that A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC contemplated ordinary civil
actions for declaration of nullity and annulment of marriage and thus do not apply in this case. A petition
for recognition of foreign judgment is a special proceeding, which seeks to establish a status, a right or a
particular fact, and not a civil action which is for the enforcement or protection of a right, or the
prevention or redress of wrong. The RTC considered the petition a collateral attack on the validity of a
marriage and thus dismiss it on jurisdictional ground. The OSG agreed with the petition, arguing that
Fujiki, as the spouse of the first marriage, is an injured party who can sue to declare the bigamous
marriage void.

Issue : Whether or not the Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of
Voidable Marriages (A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC) is applicable.

Held

Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages (A.M.
No. 02-11-10-SC) does not apply in a petition to recognize a foreign judgment relating to the status of a
marriage where one of the parties is a citizen of a foreign country. Moreover, in Juliano-Llave v. Republic,
this Court held that the rule in A.M. No. 02- 11-10-SC that only the husband or wife can file a declaration
of nullity or annulment of marriage does not apply if the reason behind the petition is bigamy.
While the Philippines has no divorce law, the Japanese Family Court judgment is fully consistent
with Philippine public policy, as bigamous marriages are declared void from the beginning under Article
35(4) of the Family Code. Bigamy is a crime under Article 349 of the Revised Penal Code. Thus, Fujiki
can prove the existence of the Japanese Family Court judgment in accordance with Rule 132, Sections 24
and 25, in relation to Rule 39, Section 48(b) of the Rules of Court.

You might also like