PTRL4011 Study Guide 2017
PTRL4011 Study Guide 2017
Guide to Study
1. Introduction
In this course, you will be required to study and report on the engineering and
economics of an oil and gas discovery. The discovery is called the Skua
discovery. Skua was a discovery in the Vulcan Sub-basin offshore northern Australia
in the Timor Sea. It was discovered in the 1980s, produced during the early 1990s
and then abandoned.
We have obtained data on the Vulcan Sub-basin and the Skua field from the
Australian Geological Survey Organisations archives.
1.1 Timetable
The timetable and milestones for the course are shown in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1
1
S2 Economics Michael Skinner
2
Stuart Walsh
3 Traiwit Chung
4 Jack Lin 20 Aug 2017
Huifang Song
5
S2
6
Furqan Hussain
7
Engineering TBA
8
TBA
9 8 Oct 2016
10
Michael Skinner
11
S2 Valuation Stuart Walsh 20 Oct 2016
12
TBA
S2 13 Presentations Various TBA
Footnotes
# Submit electronic copies of reports and assessment/plagiarism cover sheets to
Moodle by 17.00 pm on the submission day. A final copy of the comprehensive
report is required in week-13.
Minimize the size of your file. Include a signed assessment cover sheet as the first
page.
1.2 Marks
The maximum marks will be as shown in Table 1.2
Table 1.2
Written Report 70
Participation marks 10
Oral/poster presentation 20
Total 100%
*SY/FL: satisfactory or fail
Note: Lecturers are not officially permitted to disclose to students the marks
they award for any part of the thesis. The UNSW administration has the
responsibility to issue marks.
Reports must be individual models/reports. It should be clear from these that they
are entirely your own original work. This means that each report should include a
signed assessment/plagiarism cover sheet. You should sign and scan the plagiarism
cover sheet before you include it in your report.
(a) The format of the title of the file containing your submission should be
Student number - Name Subject. Please use the short form of your name.
(b) The main text should be in Trebuchet 11 point.
(c) The left hand side header should read "PTRL 4011 Final Year Thesis.
(d) The right hand side header should read "Page X"
(e) You should put a line under the header.
(f) The left hand side footer should show the short form of your name
(g) The right hand side footer should show the date (eg "1 October 2014")
(h) You should put a line above the footer.
(i) Headers and footers should be in Trebuchet 11 point.
(j) As a general rule, the contents of reports should be (in this order)
(l) Final Report should be no longer than 40 pages. This includes the title page,
introduction, summary, assumptions, methods, results & discussion,
conclusion, references and glossary section, but does not include the
appendices section.
(m) The appendices section should only include tables and figures. It should not
include any detailed analysis or results.
1.5 Data
In addition to the data given in references, additional data will be uploaded on
Moodle.
2. Objectives
The objective of the thesis is to value the field under study. You will study and
report on the economics, reservoir engineering and development of the field under
study.
3. Economic model
The purpose of developing the economic model is to enable you to perform an
economic analysis of each of your field development plans and production profiles,
as well as, assessing the impact of different assumptions about costs and prices
using sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo Simulations.
Therefore you need to construct your economic model on a single sheet containing
all input data, calculations and results. This means that you can have one sheet for
each case that you might examine.
3.1 Assumptions
Please use the following additional assumptions and data as appropriate
(a) When you build the economic model, assume data for the production, past
exploration costs, future real capital costs, and future real operating costs as
shown in Table 1. When you use the model later in the project, you will enter your
own data for these variables.
(b) Assume that the oil price, gas price, capital and operating costs are escalated
at 3% per year. In the calculation of nominal costs, assume that the cost data in
Table 1 is estimated with products and services priced as at Future Year 1, that the
costs are incurred at the end of the years shown and that the oil price is received
at the end of the years shown. Therefore, for instance, the nominal oil price and
the costs in future year 2 are 3% more than the real price and costs shown.
When you use the model later in the project, you should enter your own escalation
assumptions based on your own view of the future of inflation rates.
2022 20 10
3.2 Design
We recommend that you design your economic model with these features -
(a) See Appendix 1 for an example of the suggested layout for each sheet of your
model.
(b) Ensure that your model will allow you to carry out sensitivity and Monte Carlo
analyses on key input variables including production, price, capex and opex.
(c) Ensure that you allow all costs and price to be individually escalated with
individual escalation rates and escalation start years. Construct your cash flows
in nominal terms only.
(d) Use the same sheet for data, the cash flow derivation and the results (see the
notes and suggested layout in Appendix 1).
(e) Use the same format for each sheet. We recommend that you go across the
page for the yearly data and down the page for the variables. Reserve the left
hand side (LHS) of the spreadsheet to define your variables. Then allow two
columns on the LHS as spares. Then allow one column on the LHS for totals.
The remaining columns are for each year of analysis. See the suggested layout
in Appendix 1.
(f) Make sure that, for any given row, the same formula appears in each year.
(g) Remember that you will need to define some variables as probability
distributions for Monte Carlo simulation (for instance, the real oil price, the
total real capex, the total real opex, the escalation rates, and the reserves).
(h) Ensure that the model has the capability to handle cash flow forecasts of 40
years.
This stage of the thesis involves designing the development of the field and then
deciding how much you would recommend that your company should offer to
purchase it.
You will use the geological model developed in Thesis-A to prepare your dynamic
simulation model. Then you will use this model to run various development scenarios.
There are many possibilities for designing the development of the Skua discovery
conceptually. The possible development scenarios should take into account the
following (this is by no means an exhaustive list) -
Each scenario would give a different production profile (for example, from
reservoir simulation), different economics and different reserves and recovery
factor (economic recovery of oil).
1. Determine the production profiles for oil and gas (for instance, by reservoir
simulation).
2. Estimate the costs of development and operation.
3. Analyse the economics and so determine the NPV, the reserves and the recovery
factor.
The task is to optimise the development given that we do not know for certain the
oil-in-place or the behaviour of the wells or the oil price etc. There are no easy
answers and in the end it is a matter of professional judgment based on analysing
different possibilities.
An analysis of all possible scenarios would be impractical and very time consuming.
In practice, only a few of the more likely scenarios would be examined. As a
guide, we recommend that you examine only the cases described below. This is a
recommendation. It is not intended to stop you from examining other cases if you
wish to do so.
Assume -
Based on these field development assumptions, choose the number of wells and the
location of each well.
4.3. Analysis
Based on the assumptions above, follow the procedure below to analyse field
development.
(a) Use the reservoir simulator to determine the production profile in annual time
steps.
The platform.
The topsides.
Drilling.
Sub-sea completions and tie-back to platform.
The onshore supply base.
Installation.
Miscellaneous (insurance, engineering, project management, contingency).
Assume that the real annual fixed operating costs are 5% of the total real capital
costs.
(c) Run the economics using the model you built at the start of the semester and
note the nominal NPV at a 10% discount rate as at 1 Jan 2015, the reserves and the
recovery factor.
In practice, steps (a) to (c) would be repeated for the 2P and 3P oil-in-place
estimates and an appropriate development concept chosen. However, in this case
you should assume only the 2P oil-in-place estimate.
5.4. Valuation
5.1 Objective
One of the aims of this project is to assess the value of the Skua discovery with a
view to making a bid to acquire it.
In the valuation exercise you are asked to assess the value of the discovery and
recommend a board of directors what price it should offer for a 100% participating
interest in the property.
A major problem we must overcome in putting a price on the Skua discovery is the
fact that there are large uncertainties in key variables to which the project is very
sensitive. These include, but are not limited to, oil price, capital costs and
reserves.
You are required to derive a probability distribution of the NPV of the Skua
discovery given uncertain inputs (for instance, capex, opex, oil price, escalation
rates). To do this you can use the @RISK Monte Carlo simulation software installed
on the computers in the computer lab. The software is an Excel add-in and so you
can use your economic models to derive the NPV distribution.
The economic parameters you will need for the study are future oil prices, cost and
price escalation rates and the discount rate. You are expected to make your own
assumptions for these variables. Please discuss these with the lecturer if you need
help.
The oil price has been very volatile in the past and is likely to continue to be
volatile in the future. If you wish you can get the Monte Carlo simulation software
to obtain a probability distribution of oil prices and then use this in your valuation.
Use your own views regarding what the probability distribution of future crude oil
prices should be.
As regards capital and operating costs, we suggest that you use a normal
probability distribution with the 10th percentile being 80% of the central estimate
of costs and the 90th percentile being 150% of the central estimate of costs.
In the first part of the thesis you estimated probability distributions for oil in place.
Based on the reservoir simulation exercise, you also estimated or used estimates of
recovery factors to derive reserves. Therefore, in addition to distributions for oil in
place, you could also derive probability distributions for reserves. We suggest
however, that for this exercise you use only the mean or expected value of the
probability distribution of reserves.
Once you have derived the probability distribution of NPV, make a note of its
mean, standard deviation, and 10th, 50th and 90th percentile.
Based on the results of the Monte Carlo simulation, decide what you consider to be
the most appropriate price you recommend the board should offer for the
discovery. Explain why you choose this value.
Appendix 1
Worksheets
We recommend that you use a single page / worksheet for
1. Field data including production profiles for oil and gas, exploration, capital and
fixed and variable operating costs.
2. Economic assumptions including the definition of the years, the discount date
and escalation rates for oil and gas prices, capital and operating costs. Allow each
price and cost variable to have its own separate escalation rates.
3. The before and after tax net cash flow in nominal terms over the economic life
of the field.
4. Results including -
(a) NPV (nominal only). The NPV is to be presented in tabular and graphical form
for discount rates from 0% to 100% in steps of 5%.
5. The page should include both past and future years and should have a similar
format.
We recommend that you use a separate page / worksheets for a graph of nominal
NPVs against discount rate.
Appendix 1 Example layout for economic model. Examine this for layout only. Ignore
the text and the numbers.
Project net cash flow over economic life Units Spare Spare Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
total project
Oil sales MMbbl 0.0
Oil price $/bbl Esc
Oil revenue $MM 0.0
Gas sales Bcf 600.0 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Gas price $/bbl Esc 3.00 3.09 3.18 3.28 3.38 3.48 3.58 3.69 3.80 3.91
Gas revenue $MM 2,642.6 98.35 101.30 104.33 107.46 110.69 114.01 117.43
Gross revenue $MM Esc 2,642.6 98.35 101.30 104.33 107.46 110.69 114.01 117.43
Acquisition costs $MM Esc 0.0
Exploration costs $MM Esc -10.0 -10.00
Development costs $MM Esc -334.2 -31.87 -98.47 -169.05 -34.82
Production costs $MM Esc -467.9 -17.41 -17.93 -18.47 -19.03 -19.60 -20.19 -20.79
Abandonment costs $MM Esc -157.2
Project net cash flow for economic life $MM 1,673.3 -41.87 -98.47 -169.05 46.11 83.36 85.86 88.44 91.09 93.82 96.64
Type no 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
2 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7
3
4 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
5 7 7 7 7 7 7 -7 -7 -7 -7
6 -7 -7 7 7 7 7 7 -7 -7 -7
7 -7 7 -7 7 7 -7 -7 -7 -7
Explanation
Your economic life logic should find the year in which the end of economic life occurs for each of the net cash flow types shown
above. In these examples, the cash flow is zero or +$7 or -$7 each year. In your model, the level of the net cash flow will vary.