Inception Report PMC Final
Inception Report PMC Final
INCEPTION REPORT
For Development of ICT Infrastructure in HPPWD and HPRIDC
This document is the property of Wipro Ltd., who owns the copyright thereof. The information in this document is given in confidence and without
the written consent of Wipro Ltd., given by contract or otherwise, this document must not be copied, reprinted or reproduced in any material form,
either wholly or in part. Also the contents of this document or any methods or techniques available there from, must not be disclosed
Document Title: Inception Report for Development of ICT Infrastructure in HPPWD and HPRIDC
Document Status: Draft copy to be submitted to the Customer (HP PWD & RIDC, Govt. of
Himachal Pradesh)
Reviewers
Date Reviewer Remark
27/08/15 HPPWD, Word Bank Team, Nodal Officer IT Second Release Version
27/04/15 Nodal Officer IT, HPPWD First Release Version
Remarks
Distribution
Version Name Location
3 HP PWD & HPRIDC Shimla
NOTE to Holders:
If you receive an electronic copy of this document and you print it out, you should write your
name on the front cover (for document control purpose).
If you receive a hard copy of this document, please, write your name on the front cover (for
document control purposes).
Table of Contents
Contents
1 Preface & Acknowledgement................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Purpose of the Inception Report..................................................................................................... 5
11 Conclusion........................................................................................................................... 54
The 28th Month assignment commenced from 6th April 2015 is to provide Consultancy Services to help
HPPWD & HPRIDC, Govt. of HP to develop & implement a comprehensive & viable ICT Infrastructure
covering all design, development & implementation stage of the project. HPWPD & HPRIDC has planned
to modernize its existing infrastructure so as to gear up to meet the demand for growth of the sector and
the economy of the State. We would assistance/advisory in implementation of full-fledged ICT based MIS
solution to be named as Integrated Information System in all the departments, offices and stakeholder
office of the HPPWD & HPRDC.
We have submitted the second version of Inception Report of the assignment after completing the
situation assessment studies during the inception phase through self-study and meetings with Nodal
Officer. After receiving comments from the World Bank team, the report has been modified specially in
deliverables, Capacity Building Plan & in Project Construction phase.
The main objective of Inception Report is to highlight the assessment of the current situation of the project
parameters, as originally envisaged in the Terms of Reference (ToR), after findings during the Inception
Phase. This report also highlights our approach & methodology, towards successful completion of the
project, team deployment and timelines for the project.
We would like to thank Chief Engineer-cum-Project Director, Superintending Engineer, AE-IT cum Nodal
Officer, and all the representative of HPPWD & HPRIDC, other stakeholders supporting our team in
executing the assignment and for preparing this report.
It is important that the contents of the Inception Report to be simple and understood by various
stakeholders of the project. Input from the HPPWD, HPRIDC and other stakeholders are important for
the development of the Inception Report and leadership of HPPWD & HPRIDC must validate proposed
task in order to be activated. In order to be accurate and accomplish the proposed work, it would also
be important for HPPWD & HPRIDC officials and other stakeholders to cooperate to complete the
necessary tasks.
HPPWD at Directorate level is headed by a position of the Engineer-in-Chief (EnC) with Headquarters at
Shimla. Works and matters regarding Codes, Specifications, Planning & Monitoring, Inter-State
Connectivity for the entire State and also the entire establishments of HPPWD are controlled by the
Engineer-in-Chief. Engineer-in-Chief is responsible for all technical functions of the HPPWD. Engineer-in-
Chief reports to Pr. Secretary (PW) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh.
In HPPWD there are one EnC (QC & D), 8 Chief Engineers (CE-cum-Project Director HPRIDC, CE
Shimla Zone, CE Mandi Zone, CE Hamirpur Zone, CE Kangra Zone, CE PMGSY, CE (NH) who report to
the EnC. Each Chief Engineers are responsible for each unit called wing/zone.
Engineer-in-Chief (Quality & Design) acts as State Level Quality Coordinator for achieving quality
parameters of works in the State. Material Testing Laboratories at State level and Zonal Laboratories
are under his control. He conducts quality control checks throughout the State. He is the in-charge for
Standardization of Designs and Drawings for Buildings, Bridges and Assurance of common Technical
Instructions, Manual of Order, Codes & Specifications, Schedule of Rates, Training Programs, Workshops
and allied fields etc.
On administrative and functional considerations, the department has been divided into four zones namely
Mandi Zone, Hamirpur Zone, Shimla Zone and Kangra Zone at Dharmshala.
Each zone is being headed by Chief Engineers and they are called as Zonal Chief Engineers. Zonal Chief
Engineers deals with all works related to PMGSY, State Budget, RIDF, Annual plan, Maintenance, etc. They
are responsible for all works relating to DPR / Estimate preparation, tendering, allotment of works,
reviewing progress, monitoring, maintenance and expenditure.
The Zones (Buildings, Roads & Bridges), Electrical, Mechanical, Quality Control & Design and National
Highways wing have filed offices called circles, which are headed by Superintending Engineers (SE) who
reports to the concerned Chief Engineers for the administration and general professional controls of the
public works being executed by officers of the department within their circles. There are 14 B & R circle,
2 Electrical circles, 1 Mechanical circle, 1 Arbitration circle, 2 NH circle, 1 Land Acquisition Office, 1 Chief
Architect Office. Each circle further divided into number of divisions, each headed by Executive Engineer.
There are 60 R&B divisions, 5 Electrical divisions, 2 Mechanical divisions, 5 NH divisions, 1 Land Acquisition
office, 1 Architect Office. Each division further divided into sub-divisions, each headed by Assistant
Engineers. There are 284 sub-divisions, 11 field offices viz. Arbitration office, Land Acquisition office,
Architect office & Quality Control office.
Himachal Pradesh Road & Other Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited was incorporated in
10.06.1999 under the Companies Act, 1956, and it is wholly owned Company of Government of Himachal
Pradesh. The main objective of HPRIDC is;
HPRIDC is headed by the rank of Chief Engineer and called as Project Director-cum-Chief Engineer
HPRIDC.
The roads will be constructed with an effective and eco-friendly technology. The elected representatives
and village community will be involved in the construction and maintenance of the roads for transparency
in construction and maintenance.
Head of Road & Bridges wing is a Chief Engineer in each of the four Zones who looks after the functions
of the wing which are listed below;
Construction and maintenance of State buildings and their transfer from one department to
another
Construction and maintenance of building on behalf of other departments (except for the Police
Department)
Acquisition of land for construction of buildings and roads
Settlement of claims of contractors
Construction and maintenance of National Highways on behalf of Government of India
Construction and maintenance of all roads in the State (except those owned by the local bodies
within municipal limits), bridges, ferries, tunnels, ropeways, causeways, strategic roads, tactical
roads, border area roads etc.
Toll levied by the State Government in connection with State subjects other then toll levied by
the Local bodies
Follow with Ministry of Railways with regard to development of railways and other facilities
provided by the Ministry of Railways
Construction of roads and bridges with funds made available by State Government from budget
allocations, by raising loan from Financial Institutions, by raising Bonds and allocation under
Central Road Funds (CRF)
Construction of Rural links and development of Core networks through village roads under
PMGSY sponsored by Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India
Construction and maintenance of buildings of State Government departments with funds provided
under budget allocation, grant-in-aid/matching grant from Govt. of India
Construction and maintenance of National Highways in the State with funds provided by Ministry
of Road Transport & Highways, Govt. of India
All aspects of tendering process right from the pre-qualification stage to the opening of bids and
its evaluation
Quality Check & Control Wing is headed by the rank of Engineer-in-Chief. It performs the following
functions;
Quality control wings monitors, manages and tracks all processes relevant to quality assurance
along with the entire execution of work.
Coordinates inspection processing and initiates corrective measures.
Create and maintain Quality Register
Capture test results/build test lab at sites
Generate National Quality Monitor/ State Quality Monitor
Track Action &Take report from site
To do inspection of site after complaint by any stakeholder of project.
Chief Engineer, National Highways with headquarters at Shimla controls the Planning and Execution of
works of National Highways traversing through the State.
There are 2 NH circle and 5 NH divisions who reports to CE. The CE-NH reports to E-in-C.
Reduce the line of communication between the GoI and state authorities
Achieve efficiency in implementation by avoiding cumbersome and outdated delegations for
administrative and technical sanction which limit the ability of the HPPWD to respond quickly
Achieve uniform maintenance & construction standard on National Highways
Architecture Wing
Head of Architecture wing is Chief Architect who looks after the activities of the wing listed below;
Arbitration Wing
Superintending Engineer Arbitration Circle Solan deals with the entire arbitration cases of the Department
viz.
Assists the department to address dispute between the parties under the contract.
Decision making or disposal of arbitration case on the basis of Statement of facts, claims Submitted
by contractor and reply received
Keeps track on the status of all arbitration cases and provide the information to concerned parties
Acts as neutral party between PWD & Contractor for faster dispute settlement
PMGSY Wing
Chief Engineer (PMGSY) looks after the activities of the wing listed below;
Planning, Monitoring and day-to-day interaction with Govt. of India (MoRD) for the works of
PMGSY and PMGSY (World Bank) funded projects through National Rural Road Development
Agency (NRRDA)
Electrical Wing
Superintending Engineer (Electrical) controls the works related to electrical installation, central heating,
air conditioning, lifts, fire-fighting, fire alarm system, L.T. Sub-Station, Public Address system and CCTV
systems in all Govt. residential & non-residential buildings. There are two electrical circles and 5 electrical
divisions.
Mechanical Wing
Superintending Engineer (Mechanical) controls the works related to this wing. SE (Mechanical) reports to
CE (Road & Bridges). There are one mechanical circle and two mechanical divisions.
3 PROJECT BACKGROUND
3.4 Deliverables
S. Deliverables Due from
No. Commencement
Study existing system and collect information and data which would help in planning & executing
the project. We shall study and understand;
Study of processes and the related information flows in all key functional areas identified
for the automation / computerization
Understand present legislation and any further reorganization proposal under
consideration
Study of current technology usage
Understanding of technology infrastructure being used currently
Actors and participants in service delivery
Data capture points in the service delivery process
Supporting documentation requirement and formats used
Government orders, Departmental orders, etc.
Following data collection method shall be adopted by our team during field study-
Data Collection: A standard data collection format has been devised with the purpose of
collecting all required information. We shall collect current & historical Information/ Data on
paper or electronic media, for making it available during system implementation.
After carrying out the detailed Assessment study, our team will have understanding on the
following aspects of services:
The vision, mission, goal, present organization structure, functions and services of
HPPWD& HPRIDC.
The critical success factors for the department and the complex processes of road
management and maintenance in the State.
The reporting & output requirements, improvement areas in the client connection
and interfaces with the system.
The existing IT Infrastructure (Hardware, Software and Network) of the
department and capacity utilization of the same;.
Inventory of the application software used at various sites and interdependencies
between various modules and workflow requirements.
Based upon the detailed AS-IS assessment study, we shall review and update the AS-IS Study
on existing business processes and Validate and finalize mapping of AS-IS study in various
existing applications in the existing information system. We shall also identify the maintenance
requirements of the implemented system, and finalize it in discussion with the department.
The target state would be envisioned after benchmarking of the normalized processes by
comparing the existing process with the relevant best practices. After the identification of
potential improvements to the existing processes, the development of the To-Be workflow
system would be built on the research from the benchmarking and best practices activities. It
would also be required to identify and document risks associated with implementation of the
automated workflow processes.
For this purpose, our team shall review and update the existing To-Be Business Process
Report. During this stage, a detailed discussion shall also be held with the Domain &
Operational Experts at HPPWD/Department of IT, Himachal Pradesh.
This phase would consist of following activities:
a. Review the Process Objectives
The purpose of this step is to determine whether the desired end result of the process:
I. is consistent with the objectives
II. addresses customer needs and expectations
III. is measurable
IV. can be implemented
The purpose of this step is to identify and explore the possibilities of alternative procedures
that can be adopted to accomplish the desired outcome. Each activity of the As-Is process
would be analyzed to re-assess limitations and explore alternate processes that would result
in more efficient and innovative processes. The national / international best practices
compiled in the previous steps will also be used to identify the re-usable procedures
wherever applicable. Finally, alternate processes would be designed incorporating the
process objectives and best practices adopted elsewhere.
The purpose of this step is to present the redesigned process to Different Working Group
and obtain their feedback on the recommendations. This step involves iterative discussions
with the Working Group and Core Group, to ensure that required clarifications are
provided along with supporting documentation and perceived benefits of the redesigned
process.
The purpose of this step is to develop measurable indicators for each of the redesigned
process, which would help decision makers examine the outcome of various measured
processes and strategies.
Refer annexure-I.
After AS-IS Assessment & To-Be, our team would develop a detailed project report, which
would assimilate the requirements for implementation of the proposed project and detail them.
The Team during development of the DPR would focus on the following key areas:
The DPR Report thus prepared by us would be submitted to the department for approval by
the internal committee of Department for further go-ahead.
During this phase our team shall suggest the HPPWD on following;
The Policy shall be formulated after duly considering the IT Policies of the Govt. of India
and the State.
The Policy shall be thoroughly discussed with the members and senior officials of HPPWD
and Department of IT Himachal Pradesh.
4.1.2.2 Approach for Bid Process Management (Technical & Combined Evaluation Report)
a. Pre-Bid Vendor Management
c. Agreement Signing
After vendor evaluation and selection of a System Integrator/ Consultant, to undertake the
project implementation work, our team shall prepare work order which shall be issued to
the vendor in order to start the implementation work. Apart from the work order team
During this phase selected System Integrator (SI)/Implementing Agency (IA) would start rolling
out the filed level activities, software/solution development, training plan etc. which would be
reviewed by our team and submit progress report to HPPWD at regular interval.
Our team would use PRINCE2 / PMP framework for managing the program / project. The
project planning would be done in following a Top down Approach. The program would be
broken down into Work Packages and drilled down to activity / sub activity level.
a. Review of Project Plan Submitted by System Integrator/Implementing Agency
The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework required for monitoring various
components of the project will be designed in consultation with the Department, and the
outcome of the M&E will be submitted to Department on a regular basis. Our team would
review the project plan submitted by agency on the basis of parameter defined in M&E. This
would also include but not limited to followings;
Weekly/Project Status Report Template
FAT Templates
Sign-Off Templates
Change Management Templates
Project Monitoring Templates
Report of the review would be submitted to HPPWD.
b. Review of System Requirement Specification (SRS)
Our team will review the System Requirement Specification document submitted by the
SI/IA. In the SRS report our team will review the following;
Review High Level System Design (Process Flows, System Architecture, Data Flow
Diagram)
Review Low Level System Design (Database Structures, Entity Relationship Diagram,
Audit-Trails, Access Levels Functionalities, Use Cases, Class Diagram, Sequence
Diagram, etc)
Study Systems Flow Charts, depicting boundaries of each system
Review Input forms/screens design & Reports format Design, layout and reporting
procedures including reporting levels and frequency etc.
Review Screen layouts, menus design, Design of security levels and Intersystem
linkages
Roles management specification
Approach to collect Master data and data migration techniques.
Review MIS reports and dash board application.
Review Communication strategy and Quality assurance approach.
Review System roll out approach and Infrastructure Up-gradation schedule
Progress report of the review would be submitted to HPPWD
c. Review of Prototype & Pilot Implementation
During this phase, our team will review and assess the software development work and its
technical viability whether it is developed as planned and as perr approved SRS or not. Our
team will review the following but not limited to;
Workflows
Program Charts
System Configuration
System installation including, application users and parameters setup, configuration,
integration check
Data migration including data integrity and structure
User Acceptance Test (UAT) Report
Progress of review would be submitted to HPPWD.
d. Review of Training & Change Management
Our team would review and support the SI/IA in the following activities but not limited to;
Training plan for conducting training
Training Material/manuals developed for training of HPPWD officials
Status of training and handholding provided
Change management and Support
Awareness building of computers to new users
Advance training to existing IT users System
User Manuals
omissions, and adherence to contract/RFP/Project plan etc. We would review all the
deliverables as defined in RFP. Our team would also submit audit findings report to HPPWD.
f. Phase Completion & Issue Log Report
Initiation of Go-Live implies that all essential work has been correctly completed by the SI/IA
and the application is ready for usage.
Our team shall help in defining the criteria in order to assess the go-live readiness. The
assessment criteria after due approval by the HPPWD shall be shared with each field office.
Implementation status report shall also be maintained to know the status of hardware
installation, site preparation, and connectivity at each implementation location.
Our team will review all the deliverables submitted by SI/IA for compliance against various
feedbacks shared to quality improvements of the deliverables and report will be submitted
to HPPWD.
During Operation and Maintenance phase, our team will be supporting the Department in
monitoring of the compliance of the contractual obligations of the System
Integrator/Implementing Agency.
a. SLA Monitoring
Under this sub-task, our team shall monitor the progress of overall project activities as well
as availability of various systems as per SLA parameters defined in agreement/contract.
Indicative list of components which will be covered is as defined below;
Implementation Schedule as per project plan
Availability of Application software
Availability of hardware and network equipments
Availability of manpower as proposed
Performance of system
Our team will ensure that the SLAs and performance levels defined for System Integrator
are met as per the expectations of the HPPWD, otherwise penalty would be levied on the
System Integrator as would be proposed in the RFP. If required Consultant shall suggest for
change in the SLAs and suggest corrective and preventive measures to the HPPWD and
System Integrator to enhance the performance of the system
c. Project Evaluation
Our team will also carry out the post implementation assessment of the project. Based upon
the assessment, our team will suggest the department on following areas:
Learnings from the project,
Best practices followed during the project implementation,
Challenges faced (i.e. managerial, technical and financial),
Improvement areas
Capacity building of departmental staff, etc.
d. Capacity Building
Capacity Building is very crucial in terms of building capacity of the officials of HPPWD for
proper utilization of ICT infrastructure to be implemented in the HPPWD. Based on the
roles and responsibilities that HPPWD officials carry, a role based training approach is
proposed to capture and fill the skill gaps to capacitate government employees to use ICT
infrastructure to be implemented and sustain the change.
Detailed approach followed to conduct the capacity building & training program for all the
officials of HPPWD is depicted in the sub-tasks or training type mentioned in the table
below;
Short terms Basic The purpose of this training is to During the short
Capacity Computer acquaint and aware HPPWD officials term capacity building
Building Training employees with computer systems program, core team
Programme (hardware, internet browsing, using member would be
email and basic software tools like identified based on
MS Office, adobe etc.). The effort the interest level as
will be concentrated towards well as assessment
providing exposure to computers result of training
especially to ground level provided to them
functionaries like draftsman, head
draftsman etc.
Mid Term Specialised The training of ICT-IIS application to Once core team is
Capacity Computer be developed under this project is identified, a training
Building Training envisaged compulsory for HPPWD plan shall be made for
Programme (Application official cutting across departmental the members of the
Specific hierarchy. The training is proposed core group. This
Training) to acquaint and train the work force would enable core
with the various modules of ICT-IIS, group in providing
RDBMS, IT infrastructure, GIS technical support to
system etc. These skill set should be the end users, manage
enhanced for the core group all the existing
identified during the basic computer applications and
training. application to be
implemented in near
future.
5 Project Governance
The Governance Structure must be accompanied with Role Responsibility Matrix. An example of the
same has been produced below:
Risk Management
Policy Inputs
Team Management
Involvement in UAT
Issue Resolution
The staffing schedule is mentioned below. This schedule will be subjected to changes and modified based
upon actual timing for input requirements.
N Name Experts input (in person/month) per each Deliverable (listed in TECH-5)
Position
Bidding Document
As-Is Study report
Quarterly reports
Inception Report
Strengthening of
Requirements
requirements
Requirement
Stakeholders
Architecture
Governance
H/w & N/w
Functional
Contract
IT Policy
IT cell
DPR
Map
KEY EXPERTS
K1 Naveen Project [Home] 0.5 0.75 0.75 0.25 0.50 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.10 0.10 0.25 0.15 1.50 2.00 0.35
Prakash Manager
[Field]
K2 Gulshan Senior [Home] 0.3 0.50 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.10 0.10 0.25 0.15 1.50 2.00 0.35
Arora Consultant
[Field]
K3 Kuldip Singh Domain [Home] 0.2 0.75 1.00 0.50 0.80 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.50 0.50 0.15
Expert
[Field] 0.50 0.25
K4 Parvinder BPR Analyst [Home] 0.2 0.75 0.30 0.50 1.25 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.10 0.15 0.40
Singh
[Field] 0.50
K5 Hena Change [Home] 0.1 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00
Chakrabarty Management
Specialist [Field]
Sub-Total
N Name
Experts input (in person/month) per each Deliverable (listed in TECH-5) Total time-input
(in Months)
Position
Performance report
Quarterly reports
Quarterly reports
Capacity Building
Project plan
reports
Home
Total
Field
KEY EXPERTS
K Naveen Project [Home] 0.15 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.20 0.80 3.75 2.00 1.50 0.75 28.00
1 Prakash Manager
[Field] 0
K Gulshan Arora Senior [Home] 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.30 2.00 1.20 0.50 2.00 0.50 1.50 0.25 20.00
2 Consultant
[Field] 0
K Kuldip Singh Domain Expert [Home] 0.10 0.40 0.25 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.50 0.20 0.25 0.30 9.00
3
[Field] 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.75
K Parvinder Singh BPR Analyst [Home] 0.15 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.40 1.40 2.00 0.30 12.00
4
[Field] 0.30 0.20 1
K Hena Change [Home] 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 2.00 1.00 0.10 6.00
5 Chakrabarty Management
Specialist [Field] 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.60 2
75 4.75 79.8
Our team would gather Departmental office setup, activities performed in each of the offices in the
following format
Works / No of IT
No. of IT
No of Activities No of Staff
Staff (in-
offices Performed personnel (out-
house)
source)
Section Office
c. IT Trained Manpower
1 Class-I
2 Class-II
3 Class-III
4 Class-IV
I. Hardware Details
Description Wings / Section Wings / Section Total
<Name of Wings> <Name of Wings>
Desktop <Qty> <Qty>
Laptop
Printers (DMP)
Laser Printers
Color Laser
Printer
Scanner
UPS (Online)
UPS (Offline)
Networking Devices
Router
Switch
Connectivity
Others
9.1 Objectives
Objectives of quality plan is to define Quality standards, assurance and control metrics that ensures
HPPWDs project objectives are met consistently and continually improved.
The Quality Assurance Plan will serve as a base process for monitoring the overall Quality Assurance
activities to ensure:
All the domains/wings are following uniform process
Project performance are monitored using an uniform approach
The processes are enhanced on a continuous basis to meet the dynamic needs
Continuous performance improvement in terms of quality of delivery, better project control and
above all improving customer satisfaction.
Wipro being a CMMI L-5 organization follows Velociq (Wipro copyright) the Quality Management System
(QMS) of matured processes based on ISO, CMMI, industry best practices concepts. The Teams will follow
these internal Wipro Processes w.r.t. Project Management, Risk Management, Quality Assurance and
Change Management as per Contractual obligations.
Apart from quality structure activities/responsibilities, following are the detailed level responsibilities of
different roles.
2 Wipro Delivery Head Direct and manage the end-to-end integrity and success of the
/ Project Director overall program delivery
Accountable for program delivery to time, cost and quality
constraints
Relationship management with internal and external
stakeholders
4 Quality Assurance Overall Guidance and mentoring of the Team w.r.t. Quality
Head frameworks
Create a culture of Six Sigma in the Engagement thru
awareness programs
Ensure overall Quality Assurance plan is executed
Ensure resources are provided for various levels of quality
structure
Review and approve Audit plans
Review Audit findings and Audit analysis
Review process improvement initiatives
Participate in process improvement activities
Revisions & Version controls of the documents shall be maintained as per Naming Conventions and
Version Control sections. Wipro quality team would review all the deliverables as per QA perspective.
We would also check the deliverables for completeness, content, omissions, and adherence to
contract/RFP/Project plan etc.
Milestone review shall be conducted for every deliverable to HPPWD to ensure that all the mandatory
checks are in place and mandatory activities are done before the product is rolled out to the HPPWD for
UAT, to minimize defect leakage.
Following are the indicative activities which would be performed for project monitoring and control. This
table will be updated as and when required.
S. Activities Frequency Responsibility
No.
5. Monitoring the closure of NCs raised As and when required Quality Manager /
from audits/reviews Operations Manager /
Project Manager
Risks and EWS will be identified from time to time and proper mitigation and contingency plans will be
prepared. Risks will be tracked through Clarity.
To ensure that quality plan is implemented at various levels, internal audits will be conducted for ensuring
process compliance, adherence to plans of process initiatives. Detailed level audit plans will be prepared
in agreement with the stakeholders.
Following are the various tools which will be used to track various activities. Additions/modifications will
be made time to time based on improvements.
Following reports would be prepared and submitted to HPPWD for status reporting;
Weekly Status Report (WSR) covering status of activities, risks, challenges, support required etc.
Project Status Report (PSR): This report is prepared on Monthly basis highlighting the status of
activities, risks, challenges, activities planned for next month etc.
Minutes of Meeting of various reviews meeting
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A report on the requirements suggested by the
stakeholders and measures required to be taken for
1.0
D1
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Updation of existing To-Be report on the basis of
approved Gap report.
Submission of updated To-Be report to department
for approval
Approval on To-Be report by department
Module-wise functional requirements 0.5
D4
department
Study the existing IT Infrastructure (Hardware,
Software and Network) of the department and
capacity utilization of the same;
Take inventory of the application software used at
various sites of Department and identify
interdependencies between various modules and
workflow requirements;
Collection of data regarding present Software,
Hardware and Network infrastructure of HPPWD,
Himachal
Estimation of hardware, software, middleware,
Network management solutions, design of network
architecture, etc. for the redesigned system.
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Detailed Project Report (DPR) 2.25
D7
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Study of existing terms of reference, tasks handled by
& skill set of the people in the IT cell.
Preparation of terms of reference for the IT Cell of
the department and recommending measures for its
strengthening and capacity building for effectively
managing the IT program;
Submission of draft terms of reference to the
department
Comments by Department
Submission of revised terms of reference
Approval by department on the revised terms of
reference & other measures
IT Policy for the HPPWD along with a policy
framework consisting of IT strategy and an
D10
1.75
implementation action plan down the road map as
well as the IT Security Policy
Study of IT policy of GOI and other states
Preparation of draft IT Policy for the HPPWD along
with a policy framework consisting of IT strategy and
an implementation action plan down the road map as
well as the IT Security Policy
Comments and approval by department on the IT
policy.
Bidding documents including Terms of References,
D11
and Request for Proposal (RFP) using the World Bank 1.5
standard procurement documents
Preparation of Bidding documents (RFP) including
Terms of Reference, Technical, General terms and
condition using the World Bank standard
procurement documents.
Determining the scope of work as per approved cost
for the project implementation.
Preparation and Submission of Draft RFP to
department
Review of the RFP by Department
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Submission of Finalized RFP
Approval on final RFP by department
Floating of RFP
Technical and combined evaluation report as per
D12
1.25
World Bank standard procurement procedure
Assist in Pre-Bid Meeting
Preparation of Pre bid query response and
Corrigendum (if any)
Discussion and Finalization of Pre bid query response
and Corrigendum (if any) with department
Release of Pre-bid queries response and
Corrigendum.
Bid Submission by prospective bidders.
Evaluation of the Bid against the Pre-Qualification and
Technical criteria defined in RFP
Seek clarification from vendors on any technical
points.
Preparation of technical evaluation report
Preparation and Submission of Bid Evaluation Report
Opening of Commercial bids of Technically qualified
bidders.
Evaluation and shortlisting of Final selected bidder.
Contract along with service Level Agreement (SLA)
D13
2
with the selected consultant(s)
Preparation of draft Contract agreement
Legal vetting of Contract agreement by Department
Insertion of comments and submission of final
Contract agreement.
Contract signing along with service Level Agreement
(SLA) with the selected System integrator/
consultant(s)
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Project plan for hardware procurement, networking,
D14
2
security design, application developed and
implemented by System Integrator, testing etc.
Submission of report on the SRS, System design,
database design, hardware sizing projected, security
design, etc. by System Integrator.
Review of these reports by Consultant & providing
comments to SI.
Review of updated SRS report & submission of report
to Department
Final sign-off by department on the reports
Review of Prototype of all the modules & Pilot
D16
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Review report of training, change management,
D17
1
plan
Submission of report on tasks completion by the
System Integrator.
Verification and Quality audit of these reports by the
Consultant
Submission of Audit report along-with action plan to
department
Phase completion report incorporating detail report
on works carried out by vendors for HPPWDCP
D19
1
implementation as well as compliance of Quality Audit
and Review Reports
Submission of report on tasks completion by the
System Integrator.
Review of the project completion and submission of
Phase completion report incorporating detail report
on works carried out by vendors for HPPWDCP
implementation as well as compliance of Quality Audit
and Review Reports
Final sign off by department on the phase completion
Months
Deliverables
TOT
N
AL
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
D20
6
departmental staff by SI.
3
and/or Lessons Learned Report
Preparation of Project learning documents, Status
summary, Lessons Learned, best practices followed,
challenges faced (i.e. managerial, technical and
financial) and improvements suggested.
Submission of report to department for review.
Submission of final report to the department.
11 Conclusion
It is extremely important that effective lines of communication to be open as soon as the Project starts.
We request HPPWD to use their good offices and support us to facilitate in their necessary interactions
with other Government agencies.
We expect that the required level of Working Group, Core Group and Nodal Person should be in place
so as to facilitate the decision-making and approval process throughout the Project period. We also expect
that as discussed during Project Kick-off meeting workshop approach for validation and finalization of
deliverables would be adopted.