RT/PV PV RTZ (1.17) : Molecular Interactions
RT/PV PV RTZ (1.17) : Molecular Interactions
3 MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS 15
[1.16]
Because the molar volume of a perfect gas is equal to RT/p, an equivalent expression
is Z RT/pV om
, which we can write as
pVm RTZ (1.17)
Because for a perfect gas Z 1 under all conditions, deviation of Z from 1 is a measure
of departure from perfect behaviour.
Some experimental values of Z are plotted in Fig. 1.14. At very low pressures, all
the gases shown have Z 1 and behave nearly perfectly. At high pressures, all the
gases have Z 1, signifying that they have a larger molar volume than a perfect gas.
Repulsive forces are now dominant. At intermediate pressures, most gases have Z 1,
indicating that the attractive forces are reducing the molar volume relative to that of a
perfect gas.
(b) Virial coefficients
Figure 1.15 shows the experimental isotherms for carbon dioxide. At large molar
volumes and high temperatures the real-gas isotherms do not differ greatly from
perfect-gas isotherms. The small differences suggest that the perfect gas law is in fact
the first term in an expression of the form
pVm RT(1 + Bp + Cp2+ ) (1.18)
This expression is an example of a common procedure in physical chemistry, in which
a simple law that is known to be a good first approximation (in this case pV nRT) is
Z
V
V
m
mo
H2
CH4
C H 24
NH3
p/atm
2
1
0 200 400 600 800
Perfect
0
Compression factor, Z
1.00
0.98
0.96
10
H2
CH4
C H 2 4 NH3
p/atm
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
50C
40C
31.04C (T ) c
0C
p/atm
Vm/(dm mol ) 3 1
EDC
B
A
F
*
20C
-
1
2
Comment 1.4
Series expansions are discussed in
Appendix 2.
4 The name comes from the Latin word for force. The coefficients are sometimes denoted B2, B3, . . . .
Synoptic Table 1.4* Second virial
coefficients, B/(cm3 mol1)
Temperature
273 K 600 K
Ar 21.7 11.9
CO2 149.7 12.4
N2 10.5 21.7
Xe 153.7 19.6
* More values are given in the Data section.
Synoptic Table 1.5* Critical constants of gases
pc/atm Vc/(cm3 mol1) Tc/K Zc TB/K
Ar 48.0 75.3 150.7 0.292 411.5
CO2 72.9 94.0 304.2 0.274 714.8
He 2.26 57.8 5.2 0.305 22.64
O2 50.14 78.0 154.8 0.308 405.9
* More values are given in the Data section.
Pressure, p
Higher
temperature
Lower
temperature
Perfect
gas
Boyle
temperature
1
Compression factor, Z
0
Fig. 1.16 The compression factor, Z,
approaches 1 at low pressures, but does so
with different slopes. For a perfect gas, the
slope is zero, but real gases may have either
positive or negative slopes, and the slope
may vary with temperature. At the Boyle
temperature, the slope is zero and the gas
behaves perfectly over a wider range of
conditions than at other temperatures.
1.4 THE VAN DER WAALS EQUATION 17
(c) Condensation
Now consider what happens when we compress a sample of gas initially in the state
marked A in Fig. 1.15 at constant temperature (by pushing in a piston). Near A, the
pressure of the gas rises in approximate agreement with Boyles law. Serious deviations
from that law begin to appear when the volume has been reduced to B.
At C (which corresponds to about 60 atm for carbon dioxide), all similarity to perfect
behaviour is lost, for suddenly the piston slides in without any further rise in pressure:
this stage is represented by the horizontal line CDE. Examination of the contents
of the vessel shows that just to the left of C a liquid appears, and there are two phases
separated by a sharply defined surface. As the volume is decreased from C through
D to E, the amount of liquid increases. There is no additional resistance to the piston
because the gas can respond by condensing. The pressure corresponding to the line
CDE, when both liquid and vapour are present in equilibrium, is called the vapour
pressure of the liquid at the temperature of the experiment.
At E, the sample is entirely liquid and the piston rests on its surface. Any further
reduction of volume requires the exertion of considerable pressure, as is indicated
by the sharply rising line to the left of E. Even a small reduction of volume from E to F
requires a great increase in pressure.
(d) Critical constants
The isotherm at the temperature Tc (304.19 K, or 31.04C for CO2) plays a special role
in the theory of the states of matter. An isotherm slightly below Tc behaves as we have
already described: at a certain pressure, a liquid condenses from the gas and is distinguishable
from it by the presence of a visible surface. If, however, the compression
takes place at Tc itself, then a surface separating two phases does not appear and the
volumes at each end of the horizontal part of the isotherm have merged to a single
point, the critical point of the gas. The temperature, pressure, and molar volume
at the critical point are called the critical temperature, Tc, critical pressure, pc, and
critical molar volume, Vc, of the substance. Collectively, pc, Vc, and Tc are the critical
constants of a substance (Table 1.5).
At and above Tc, the sample has a single phase that occupies the entire volume
of the container. Such a phase is, by definition, a gas. Hence, the liquid phase of a
substance does not form above the critical temperature. The critical temperature of
oxygen, for instance, signifies that it is impossible to produce liquid oxygen by compression
alone if its temperature is greater than 155 K: to liquefy oxygento obtain a
fluid phase that does not occupy the entire volumethe temperature must first be
lowered to below 155 K, and then the gas compressed isothermally. The single phase
that fills the entire volume when T Tc may be much denser than we normally consider
typical of gases, and the name supercritical fluid is preferred.
1.4 The van der Waals equation
We can draw conclusions from the virial equations of state only by inserting specific
values of the coefficients. It is often useful to have a broader, if less precise, view of all
gases. Therefore, we introduce the approximate equation of state suggested by J.D.
van der Waals in 1873. This equation is an excellent example of an expression that can
be obtained by thinking scientifically about a mathematically complicated but physically
simple problem, that is, it is a good example of model building.
The van der Waals equation is
p (1.21a)
nRT
V nb
a
n
V
4
3 4
3
r3
p
nRT
V nb
p
RT
Vb
a
V
mm
2
mmm
12
a
4bR
a
4e2b2
p
T
V
/T V
e2 e
r
r
2 rr
21
p
RT
Vb
a/RTV
em
m
2
3
2
3
12
a
bR
/
1
12
2
33
12
aR
b
/
p
T
V TV
8
31
3
2
r
rrr
p
RT
Vb
a
TV
mm
2
8
27
a
bR
a
27b2 p
T
VV
8
31
3
2
r
rr
p
RT
Vb
a
V
mm
2
p
RT
V
m
Although closed expressions for the roots of a cubic equation can be given, they
are very complicated. Unless analytical solutions are essential, it is usually more
expedient to solve such equations with commercial software.
Answer According to Table 1.6, a 3.592 dm6 atm mol2 and b 4.267 102
dm3 mol1. Under the stated conditions, RT/p 0.410 dm3 mol1. The coefficients
in the equation for Vm are therefore
b + RT/p 0.453 dm3 mol1
a/p 3.61 102 (dm3 mol1)2
ab/p 1.55 103 (dm3 mol1)3
Therefore, on writing x Vm/(dm3 mol1), the equation to solve is
x3 0.453x2 + (3.61 102)x (1.55 103) 0
The acceptable root is x 0.366, which implies that Vm 0.366 dm3 mol1. For a
perfect gas under these conditions, the molar volume is 0.410 dm 3 mol1.
Self-test 1.5 Calculate the molar volume of argon at 100C and 100 atm on the
assumption that it is a van der Waals gas. [0.298 dm 3 mol1]
(a) The reliability of the equation
We now examine to what extent the van der Waals equation predicts the behaviour
of real gases. It is too optimistic to expect a single, simple expression to be the true
equation of state of all substances, and accurate work on gases must resort to the virial
equation, use tabulated values of the coefficients at various temperatures, and analyse
the systems numerically. The advantage of the van der Waals equation, however, is
that it is analytical (that is, expressed symbolically) and allows us to draw some general
conclusions about real gases. When the equation fails we must use one of the
other equations of state that have been proposed (some are listed in Table 1.7), invent
a new one, or go back to the virial equation.
That having been said, we can begin to judge the reliability of the equation by comparing
the isotherms it predicts with the experimental isotherms in Fig. 1.15. Some
2 2
p
p
p
V
V
V
T
T
Tr
c
r
m
c
r
c
3
8 0.375
Z
pV
RT c
cc
c
3
8
Vbp
a
b
T
a
Rb c c c 3
27
8
2 27
d
d
2
mmm
p
V
RT
Vb
a
2 3 V4
26
0
()
d
d mmm
p
V
RT
Vb
a
()V
2 3
2
0
4
Compression factor, Z
0246
Nitrogen
Methane
Propane
Ethene
Fig. 1.19 The compression factors of four of the gases shown in Fig. 1.14 plotted using reduced
variables. The curves are labelled with the reduced temperature Tr T/Tc. The use of reduced
variables organizes the data on to single curves.
Exploration Is there a set of conditions at which the compression factor of a van der
Waals gas passes through a minimum? If so, how does the location and value of the
minimum value of Z depend on the coefficients a and b?
Then we express the critical constants in terms of a and b by using eqn 1.22:
which can be reorganized into
(1.25)
This equation has the same form as the original, but the coefficients a and b, which
differ from gas to gas, have disappeared. It follows that if the isotherms are plotted in
terms of the reduced variables (as we did in fact in Fig. 1.18 without drawing attention
to the fact), then the same curves are obtained whatever the gas. This is precisely the
content of the principle of corresponding states, so the van der Waals equation is
compatible with it.
Looking for too much significance in this apparent triumph is mistaken, because
other equations of state also accommodate the principle (Table 1.7). In fact, all we
need are two parameters playing the roles of a and b, for then the equation can always
be manipulated into reduced form. The observation that real gases obey the principle
approximately amounts to saying that the effects of the attractive and repulsive interactions
can each be approximated in terms of a single parameter. The importance of
the principle is then not so much its theoretical interpretation but the way that it
enables the properties of a range of gases to be coordinated on to a single diagram (for
example, Fig. 1.19 instead of Fig. 1.14).