Compatibility Report for M. and L.

====================================================================
Graphology is the scientific examination of a person's handwriting
to determine the presence and intensity of various personality traits.
This report is based upon two separate Graphology reports,
compared and contrasted for compatibility of the writers of the specimens provided.
====================================================================
Compatibility Report: M. and L.
====================================================================
Requested by: F. L.
Prepared by: Balakrishnan, Level 3 student
====================================================================
Summary
Emotions: Similar
Mental Processes: Quite Different
Imagination: Similar
Potential for
Achievment
Goals: Different
Will Power: Similar
Determination: Same
Intensifying: More same than different
Reductive: Same
Fears: 09 Same, 03 different
Defenses: 25 Same, 20 different
Adjustment: 15 Same, 09 different
Resistance: 04 Same, 05 different
Escape: 06 Same, 06 different
Integrity: 16 Same, 13 different
Supportive influences: 08 Same, 06 different
Reductive influences: 08 Same, 07 different
Social Traits: 17 Same, 12 different
Positive Influences: 11 Same, 06 different
Negative influences: 06 Same, 06 different
Aptitudes: 15 Same, 07 different
====================================================================
more

Compatibility Report Page 1 of 4

Emotions

L. and M. have very similar emotional patterns they are both very outgoing, responsive
persons, quite sympathetic to the feelings of each other, and not very objective or deliberate by
nature.
M. is very predictable and consistent in emotional situations, whereas L. is more flexible,
adaptable, and unpredictable. Both are very impulsive, but not objective or self-oriented.
Both have moderately deep emotional memories. They tend to recall situations based on their
feelings, rather than their thoughts.
In high-stakes conflicts or arguments, they would be prudent to bring in an outside arbitrator
who could balance their emotional reactions with cool deliberation.

Mental processes

M. has a one-track mind, which is very predictable. L. has a variety of ways to process
information, and is more flexible and adaptable. He likes to investigate situations, using
"tried-and-true" strategies, while she likes to explore the alternatives to action.
She examines the options and analyzes the outcomes critically.
He is apt to accept the first choice as the best one, without further discussion.

M. conforms to conservative codes of conduct, whereas L. is more generous and open to the
opinions, ideas, and beliefs of others. Both are very loyal to their life values, although L. is
starting to re-examine and re-prioritize hers at present. Both are optimistic about their future
prospects. Both have good organizational ability, but M.'s is more balanced; L. is more of a doer
than a planner. L. clings to her ideas tenaciously, while M. does not. M.'s achievement is
characterized by rhythm, efficiency, and dependability, while L.'s is more flexible, adaptable,
and varied.

Both of them suffer from impulsiveness and inattention to details, and she unconsciously hides
her some of her feelings. He is more narrowminded; she is more often frequently positive and
decisive. He is quite biased about what is an acceptable viewpoint, while she handles such
internal conflicts by making excuses or rationalizing her position.

L.'s imagination is more limited in dealing with abstract ideas; but she is more apt to capitalize
on her travels and personal contacts for useful ideas for action than he is.

Potential for Achievement

M. is not a risk-taker: his goals are always practically attainable. L. has a wide variety of goals,
none of them low, and all requiring some risk she is not so concerned with the threat of failure
as is M. Both have goals which seem valuable and motivating to them; neither is "lazy" or
unmotivated. Both are extremely determined to see their projects through to completion, once
started, and both have the quality of "stick-to-itiveness."
More
Compatibility Report Page 2 of 4
26 February 2013
Compatibility Report for M. and L.

L. has more initiative, some aggressiveness, and more desire to acquire things than does M.
(some might interpret this as ambition). She is also more generous with her resources than M.,
but clings to some ideas and is more decisive in some areas than is M.

Both take pride in meeting high standards of achievement they want to look good in the eyes
of others. Both are good organizers of existing resources, but M. is a better planner than L.

Fears

M. is most afraid of risking his reputation. L. is most afraid of being ignored. Both fear loss of
face from critical remarks about their personal conduct: M. is more sensitive to criticism about
his work output than is L. Both are ill-at-ease with strangers at first. Both are afraid to commit
themselves to a firm decision, M. more so than L.

Defenses

While M. escapes into the vanity of patting himself on the back, L. escapes her fears through
her desire for variety, and by various forms of insincerity being secretive, avoiding some
issues, and deliberately falsifying the facts.
Both resist their fears by becoming defiant under pressure. M. also keeps threats away with his
sparky temper and by showing resentment.
Each adjusts to fears in different ways. He is careful to cultivate only "safe" friends;
she behaves in a dignified manner. He keeps a tight lip most of the time; she handles touchy
subjects with humor and diplomacy. She is more open and generous toward new and different
ideas; he is more conservative. Both are loyal to colleagues and established values; both strive
to measure up to the acceptable standards of the dominant culture. Both keep trying in the face
of possible failure.

Integrity & Sociability

M. is frank and sincere in expressing himself; L. is somewhat secretive, evasive, and often
rationalizes her behavior. M.is more conservative and narrowminded, while L. is more generous
and broadminded. While L. has a love of dignity, she can be a real flirt. Both M. and L. want to
look good, and take pride in acceptable achievements. Both maintain loyal commitments to their
own values and peer groups. Both follow through on their job commitments with determination
to succeed. Both are apt to compromise their standards of good conduct by acting impulsively.
M. is more inclined to be prejudiced than L., who is analytical enough to figure out the
unfairness. M.'s vanity may prevent him from admitting his more obvious faults.
More

Compatibility Report Page 3 of 4

Integrity & Sociability

M. and L.are both very sympathetic and loyal to each other. Both have high hopes about their
future together. Both recognize the quality of their accomplishments in meeting expectations of
others. L. is more talkative than M., and has a witty sense of humor. She is more dignified in
her behavior, and shows more generosity than M.
M is occasionally selfish and impatient. It is harder to become M's close friend than L's close
friend.

Aptitudes

M. is not a risk-taker; L. looks for opportunity, is more decisive, and expresses herself
diplomatically. Both can efficiently allocate resources in a situation or project, but M. is a better
planner, while L. is more of the doer. Both are determined to succeed, even in the face of
persistent obstacles.
Neither is very mechanical, but M. has a sense of rhythm that amplifies his productive efficiency,
while L. is more flexible and adaptable.
In the cultural area, L. exhibits some "showmanship" and creative tendencies, based on risk-
taking and love of variety. Both manifest a basic appreciation of color, texture, tone, aroma, and
taste, although M.'s is more intense than L.'s.
=====================================================================

Compatibility Report Page 4 of 4