Paper Grading Rubric PDF
Paper Grading Rubric PDF
Course Syllabus
Course Description
In this course, students will develop the scientific and technical reading and writing skills they need to understand
and construct research articles. The course will be divided into two parts.
In Part One of the course, students will learn the principles of writing research papers in science and engineering.
First, they will learn what research is, and how the process of research is revealed in the structure of research
papers. Next, they will look at software tools and corpora (collections of language samples) that can assist them in
the writing of research papers. At the end of the section, students will create their own corpus of research papers
and will use throughout the remainder of the course.
In Part Two of the course, students will write a full research paper in their field of specialization, working
separately on the title, abstract, introduction, materials/methods, results, and discussion in each unit. For each part
of the research paper, students will first analyze the sample texts in their corpus and then present their findings to
other members of the class. This will help all students to understand which elements are common to all science
and engineering disciplines, and which are unique to individual disciplines. Next, they will apply what they have
learned in their own writing, slowly constructing a full-research paper by the end of the course.
Course Goals
Understand the importance of English in the fields of science and engineering.
Understand common problems associated with using technical vocabulary in specialist fields.
Use effective strategies to learn technical vocabulary in specialist fields.
Use text analysis tools to identify differences in the audience, purpose, structure, style, and presentation of
technical texts in different fields.
Identify the structure of technical research papers in specialist fields.
Understand research journal Call for Papers and Instructions for Authors.
Write the title, abstract, introduction, materials/methods, results, discussion/conclusion sections of a
research paper in a specialist field.
Write simple and extended definitions.
Explain methods and processes.
Explain information in figures and tables.
Know how to strengthen or weaken the interpretation of research findings through hedging.
Understand the importance of references, citations, and avoidance of plagiarism.
Follow common conventions for citing and referencing information in a research article.
Paragraphs
Most paragraphs are at least three sentences long
Most paragraphs have good topic sentences
Many sentences are disjointed or use a very limited number of logical connectors
Style
Attempts to write in formal academic writing style but problems remain (logical connectors, no
contractions, no run-on expressions, limited use of I You, no direct questions)
Grammar
Tense/voice problems are evident but sentence meaning is clear
Basic sentence structure is good but there is some awkward phrasing
Hedging is weak
Various article mistakes are noticed
Organization
Titles: some structure links and/or content are not appropriate
Introduction: limited discussion of background/past research with little citation making the section
unconvincing
Methods: mistakes in tense/voice and several steps are not clear; procedure is mostly clear, search
engines and sources are basically described
Results: limited use of figures/tables with only brief explanation
Discussion: discusses results in simple fashion with little hedging
C Overall> Problems exist with macro issues and poor sentence construction make meaning difficult to follow;
however, the paper shows evidence of understanding of the material presented in class
Mechanics
The template is largely ignored
Various spelling and grammar mistakes are noticeable and overall meaning is not always clear
Citation/References
Citation and/or referencing are very limited or problematic.
Paragraphs
Paragraphs are less than three sentences long.
Topic sentences are often missing
Few or no logical connectors are used
Style
Little attempt to write in a formal academic writing style (logical connectors, no contractions, no run-on
expressions, limited use of I You, no direct questions)
Grammar
Tense problems are clear
Hedging is very weak or non-existent
Many article mistakes are apparent
Organization
Titles: overly simple and some structure links and/or content are not appropriate
Introduction: limited discussion of background/past research with little citation making the section
unconvincing
Methods: mistakes in tense/voice and several steps are not clear
Results: limited use of figures/tables with only brief explanation
Discussion: discusses results in simple fashion with no hedging
F Overall> Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of macro issues, and significant micro errors make
understanding difficult.
The final report is not submitted or outline was not approved
The final report shows evidence of plagiarism (more than 20% with no evidence of an attempt to paraphrase
and cite when using original or translated sentences)
The final report does not match the content of the in-class project
Mechanics - the template is ignored and the overall meaning is not clear
Citation/References are missing completely
Paragraphs - are less than three sentences long and topic sentences are missing
Style - No attempt to write in a formal academic writing style
Grammar - Tense problems are clear. Hedging is non-existent. Most sentences contain article mistakes