Form Approved

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, includi ng the time for reviewing instructions, searching exis ting data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and review ing the coll ection of information. Send comment s regarding this burden estimate or any other as pect of this
collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to W ashington H eadquarters Services, Directorate for Inform ation Operations and Reports, 121 5 Jefferson
Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Pr oject (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
May 2005 Guide Specification, JAN 1980 MAY 2005
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS
TRILATERAL DESIGN AND TEST CODE FOR MILITARY BRIDGING AND
GAP CROSSING EQUIPMENT

6. AUTHOR(S)
Brian Hornbeck (United States of America), Mr. Johannes Kluck (Germany), and
Dr. Richard Connor (United Kingdom)

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

REPORT NUMBER
TARDEC BRIDGING (AMSRD-TAR-E/ELE)

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING

AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
TARDEC BRIDGING (AMSRD-TAR-E/ELE)
6501 E. 11 MILE RD.
WARREN, MI 48397

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTION AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE: DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

This Code covers loading, design, and testing requirements to be used for the development of military clear-span bridges,
piers, floating bridges, rafts, equipment causeways, and erecting and launching structures that are part of the equipment.
The Code is used to confirm that equipment will meet the performance specified by the user. The requirements of this
Code are to be regarded as the minimum acceptable standards of performance. Requirements for fibrous composite
materials and adhesives are included but may not be complete.

Bridging and gap-crossing equipment will be designed to meet the user's requirement by applying the necessary loading
conditions, design parameters, and testing given in this Code. The Code lists material properties required and gives basic
properties for materials generally used. The Code also gives design data for guidance and checking, but the criteria are
that the equipment pass the requisite tests, meet the user's requirement, and can be manufactured readily.

14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES

Trilateral Test and Design Code, Bridging, Code, Testing, Structures 117
16. PRICE CODE

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) (EG)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239.18
Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 94
TRILATERAL DESIGN AND TEST CODE
FOR MILITARY BRIDGING AND
GAP-CROSSING EQUIPMENT
(Amended - May 2005)

AGREED TO BY:

GERMANY
UNITED KINGDOM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES

January 2005

Approved for public release: Distribution is unlimited

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

ii
 Design and Analysis Group National Representatives

Mr. Johannes Kluck Telephone:

Bundesamt fr Wehrtechnik und Beschaffung K 54 0-11-49-261-6363
Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Strasse 1 Fax:
56073 Koblenz 0-11-49-261-400-6332
Germany Email:
Johannes [email protected]

Dr. Richard Connor Telephone:

Technical Leader Gap Crossing 0-11-441-202-490283
QinetiQ Fax:
Bailey Drive 0-11-441-202-471705
Christchurch Email:
Dorset, BH23 2BN [email protected]
United Kingdom

Chairman
Mr. Brian K. Hornbeck Telephone:
US Army Tank-automotive & Armaments Command 0-11-01-586-574-5608
ATTN: AMSRD-TAR-E/BRDG MS 21 Fax:
6501 E. 11 Mile Rd. 0-11-01-586-574-7944
Warren, MI 48397-5000 Email:
United States of America [email protected]

iii
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

iv
 CONTENTS

Section Title Page

FOREWORD ix

I GENERAL

1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Scope and Field of Application 1
1.3 References 1

II DEFINITIONS AND SYMBOLS

2.1 Definitions 3
2.2 Symbols 5
2.3 Conversion Factors 7

III MATERIALS

3.1 General 9
3.2 Material Listing 9
3.3 Preliminary Working Stresses 9
3.4 Data required for Selected Materials 9
3.5 Data Required for Selected Metals 10
3.6 Data Required for Selected Composites 11
3.7 Data Required for Selected Adhesives 13

IV DESIGN PARAMETERS

4.1 General 15
4.2 Clear-Span Bridge and General Parameters 15
4.3 Combination Bridging 19
4.4 Piers 20
4.5 Floating Bridges and Rafts 21
4.6 Typical Vehicle Data for Design 23
4.7 Temperature and Environment 23

V LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

5.1 General 25
5.2 Deflections 25
5.3 Military Bridge Loads 25
5.4 Load Combinations 28

v
 CONTENTS (Continued)

Section Title Page

VI SAFETY

6.1 General 31
6.2 Design Load (P) 31
6.3 Safety Coefficients and Combined Stresses for Metal 31
6.4 Safety Coefficients at Working Load (P) for Composites and Adhesives 32
6.5 Flotation and Stability 33
6.6 Fatigue Safety Factor 33
6.7 Safety Against Overturning or Rotation 34
6.8 Lifting and Anchorage Safety 34
6.9 Air Transport Safety 34

VII FATIGUE

7.1 Scope 35
7.2 Load Spectrum Parameters 35
7.3 Fatigue Design Load Range (PFAT) 36
7.4 Damage Tolerant Design 36
7.5 Alternative Designs 37

VIII TESTING

8.1 General 39
8.2 User Trials/Performance Tests 39
8.3 Dual Testing 39
8.4 Requirement Tests 39
8.5 Structural Strength Tests 39
8.6 Trafficking Tests 43
8.7 Additional Floating Equipment Tests 43
8.8 Fatigue Tests 44
8.9 Resonance 46

IX AVOIDANCE OF OVERWEIGHT DESIGN

9.1 General 48
9.2 Prototype Structure 48
9.3 Fatigue Considerations 48
9.4 Economic Considerations 48
9.5 Modification 48

vi
 CONTENTS (Continued)

Section Title Page

XX ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

10.1 General 50
10.2 Testing 50

XI RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, AND MAINTAINABILITY

11.1 General 52
11.2 Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) 52
11.3 Parts Control and Component Testing 52
11.4 Stress Derating 52
11.5 Design Guidelines and Reviews 52
11.6 Models and Predictions 52
11.7 Software Development 53
11.8 Maintenance Concept 53
11.9 Desirable Measures of Reliability and Maintainability 53

XII BRIDGE CROSSING RATING

12.1 General 54
12.2 Normal Crossing 54
12.3 Caution Crossing 54
12.4 Risk Crossing 54
12.5 Testing 55

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX A - METAL DATA SHEETS A-1

APPENDIX B - CONVERSION FACTORS B-1
APPENDIX C - CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED
FOR THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES C-1
APPENDIX D - INTERNATIONAL TEMPER EQUIVALENTS
FOR ALUMINUM ALLOYS D-1
APPENDIX E - COMPOSITE MATERIALS DATA FORM E-1
APPENDIX F - ADHESIVE DATA FORM F-1
APPENDIX G - TYPICAL BASIC PROPERTIES OF FIBER-REINFORCED
MATERIALS BASED ON 60% FIBER VOLUME FRACTION
EPOXY COMPOSITES G-1
APPENDIX H - SAFETY FACTORS ON REQUIRED LIFE n FOR
DESIGN AND TEST H-1

vii
 CONTENTS (Continued)

APPENDIXES (Continued)

APPENDIX I - LIMIT STATE DESIGN (LSD) (Provisional) I-1

APPENDIX J - STANDARDS J-1
APPENDIX K RATIONALE (DISTRIBUTION CONTROLLED-NOT INCLUDED) K-1

viii
 FOREWORD

This Code has been agreed to by Germany (GE), the United Kingdom (UK), and the United
States of America (US). The Code was prepared by the Design and Analysis Group for Military
Bridging and Gap-Crossing Equipment. It was first published in 1974, and in 1984 it also
became Quadripartite Advisory Publication 21.

The following systems of units are used:

SI (ISO 1000, US ASTM E380, and UK PD 5686)

US Customary (US NBS Misc. Pub 233)

Where differences exist between United Kingdom English and United States of America
English, the United Kingdom English verbiage is enclosed in brackets: { }.

In order to keep this Code up to date or to modify the requirements when justified by
research, test results, or mutually agreed user requirements, it is essential that suggested
modifications and revisions or comments are submitted to the cognizant representatives of
Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America for agreement. This code has
been prepared for the design of bridges and launch mechanisms and is not intended for vehicle
design.

ix
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

x
 I. GENERAL

1.1 Introduction.

1.1.1 Bridging and gap-crossing equipment will be designed to meet the user's requirement
by applying the necessary loading conditions, design parameters, and testing given in this Code.
The Code lists material properties required and gives basic properties for materials generally
used. The Code also gives design data for guidance and checking, but the criteria are that the
equipment pass the requisite tests, meet the user's requirement, and can be manufactured readily.

1.1.2 Equipment designed and tested in one country in accordance with this Code will be
suitable for international acceptance, apart from user or troop trials.

1.2 Scope and Field of Application.

1.2.1 This Code covers loading, design, and testing requirements to be used for the
development of military clear-span bridges, piers, floating bridges, rafts, equipment causeways,
and erecting and launching structures that are part of the equipment. The Code is used to
confirm that equipment will meet the performance specified by the user. The requirements of
this Code are to be regarded as the minimum acceptable standards of performance.
Requirements for fibrous composite materials and adhesives are included but may not be
complete.

1.2.2 If different materials, unusual structures or techniques are used to which some
portions of this Code are inappropriate, the engineer is responsible for devising suitable but
similar alternative provisions including the specifying and justifying of special tests.

1.3 References.

1.3.1 This Code overrides all other national standards (except those listed below) relating
to military bridging and gap-crossing equipment unless such standards are specifically called for
by the user. The standards listed below as being valid in addition to the Code should not be
regarded as being complete. Additional unforeseen standards that may become relevant in the
future should be agreed upon trilaterally.

1.3.2 User's Equipment Requirement: Military Technical and Economy Requirement

(FRG); General Staff Requirement (UK); and Operational Requirements Document (US).

1.3.3 NATO STANAG 2021, Military Load Classification of Bridges, Ferries, Rafts and
Vehicles.

1.3.4 QSTAGS and STANAGS for standardization of equipment and details.

1.3.5 International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International Standards.

1.3.6 American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) or similar national standards.

1
 1.3.7 Production Specifications.

1.3.8 A list of standards related to paragraphs of this Code is given in Appendix J -

STANDARDS.

1.3.9 DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS-01, METALLIC MATERIALS PROPERTIES

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION. *

*
MIL-Handbook 5 withdrawn in 2004, replaced by DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS-01.

2
 II. DEFINITIONS AND SYMBOLS

2.1 Definitions.

2.1.1 Allowable Stress. The maximum stress allowed caused by the design load, P. The
stress derived from the proof, yield, or ultimate stress divided by the appropriate safety factor.

2.1.2 Applied Loads. The loads applied to a structure in addition to the dead load, D, or
self-weight.

2.1.3 Availability. A measure of the degree to which an item is in an operable and

committable state at the start of a mission when the mission is called for at an unknown (random)
time.

2.1.4 Battlefield Day - see Mission Cycle.

2.1.5 Bearing Contact (Hertz) Stress. The compressive stress due to pressure between
elastic bodies.

2.1.6 Buckling Stress. The stress due to the critical buckling load causing unstable
equilibrium at which a member fails to perform its load-resisting function due to excessive
deflection.

2.1.7 Calculated Ultimate Load (UC). The design or working load, P, multiplied by the
factor 1.5.

2.1.8 Design Load (P). The appropriate combination of loads which must be sustained by a
structure without producing stresses in excess of the allowable/working value. For static test
purposes it is the Working Load, P. In the case of the ductile materials, not sensitive to stress
concentrations, average stresses on net sections are satisfactory.

2.1.9 Failure. Failure is when any structural or functional damage causes a member or
structure to no longer perform as intended and prevents the completion of its mission; either
launching, trafficking, or recovery.

2.1.10 Fatigue Design Life. The required life multiplied by a factor which varies according
to the type of design adopted and a further factor if a mean stress/number of cycles (S/N) is used
instead of the minimum curve.

2.1.11 Fatigue Stress Range. The stress range to cause failure at the fatigue design life.

2.1.12 Impact Factor. The factor applied to an induced static load to give the equivalent
induced dynamic load caused by the load's movement.

3
 2.1.13 Maintainability. The ability of an item, under stated conditions of use, to be retained
in or restored to a specified condition when maintenance is performed by personnel having
specified skill levels and using prescribed procedures and resources.

2.1.14 Minimum Life. The life at a selected stress from an appropriate S/N curve at 97.5%
probability of survival.

2.1.15 Mission Cycle. Includes road march, launch/erection of the equipment, vehicle
trafficking and equipment use, and retrieval/disassembly of the equipment.

2.1.16 MLC. Military Load Classification.

2.1.17 Pin Bearing Stress. The compression stress normal to the axis of the fasteners (e.g.,
rivets, bolts, screws) on the projected area of the hole.

2.1.18 Proof Stress. The stress at which a material deviates from the proportionality of
stress to strain by a 0.2% strain offset.

2.1.19 Reliability. The probability that an item will perform to its intended function for a
specified interval (mission) under stated conditions.

2.1.20 Required Life. The fatigue life stated in the user's requirements.

2.1.21 Rupture Stress. The same as ultimate stress.

2.1.22 Shear Stress. The stress component tangential to the plane in which the forces act.

TYPICAL BANK CONDITION

CLEAR SPAN
DESIGN SPAN

FIRM ABUTMENT CONDITION

FIRM ABUTMENT FIRM ABUTMENT

CLEAR SPAN
DESIGN SPAN

FIGURE 2-1

4
 2.1.23 Slope. Vertical rise or fall over the horizontal distance, usually expressed as a ratio
(e.g. 1 in 10).

2.1.24 Span. The design span is the distance between the reaction point of the bank seats at
each support of the bridge. The clear span is the gap to be bridged. See Figure 2-1.

2.1.25 Stress Ratio. Stress ratio is defined as equal to the minimum stress divided by the
maximum stress.

2.1.26 Test Overload (O). The design or working load, P, multiplied by the factor 1.33.

2.1.27 Test Ultimate Load (U). The maximum test load achieved by the bridge structure or
component before sudden failure or instability.

2.1.28 Ultimate Stress. The maximum tensile, compressive, or shear stress a material is
capable of sustaining.

2.1.29 Working Load (P). The same as design load, P.

2.1.30 Working Stress. The stress caused by the working load, P. The working stress may
not exceed the allowable stress.

2.1.31 Yield Stress. The stress at which a material deviates from the proportionality of
stress to strain. This deviation may be expressed as a 0.2% strain offset.

2.2 Symbols. The following symbols are used in this Code:

Ai - Applied load to structure or component numbered in order of severity, with A1 being

the most severe

B - Braking load from vehicle(s)

D - Self-weight or dead load including impact during launching

F - Footwalk loading

KC - Fracture toughness property for material (under plane stress)

KIC - Critical stress intensity for cracking (under plane strain)

Kth - Threshold Stress intensity

M - Mud load

N - Number of cycles to failure

5
O - Overload

P - Design load or Working load

PC - Stability design load of floating bridge or raft components

PFAT - Fatigue design load range

PTEST - Applied test load related to actual material properties

Q - Hydrodynamic load: the resultant of horizontal drag or propulsion and vertical

drawdown components

R - Function of

S - Snow or ice load

T1, etc. - Strength parameters determined by test

U - Ultimate load

UC - Calculated ultimate load

Us - Minimum in-plane shear strength

V - Vehicle load, including appropriate impact and eccentricity

W - Wind load at appropriate velocity

WP - Wind pressure at appropriate velocity

XC - Minimum compressive failure strength of the unidirectional layer parallel to fiber

direction

XT - Minimum tensile failure strength of the unidirectional layer parallel to fiber

direction

YC - Minimum compressive failure strength of the unidirectional layer perpendicular to

fiber direction

YT - Minimum tensile failure strength of the unidirectional layer perpendicular to fiber

direction

1 - Normal stress in fiber direction

2 - Normal stress perpendicular to the fiber in the plane of the lamina

6
 3 - In-plane shear stress

s - Shear stress

t - Tensile stress

v - Maximum stress

x - Stress in x direction

y - Stress in y direction

h - Height difference between near and far banks

n - Required number of cycles/life

pb - Tracked vehicle ground contact bearing pressure on hard surface

v - Velocity

- Standard deviation

Additional symbols are defined in applicable appendixes.

2.3 Conversion Factors. Conversion factors for SI, Metric, and English units are in Appendix B
- CONVERSION FACTORS.

7
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

8
 III. MATERIALS

3.1 General. This section gives the material data which should be available to the designer and
is required for international standardization. The data should be presented in the form used in
Appendixes A - METAL DATA SHEETS, E - COMPOSITE MATERIALS DATA FORM, and
F - ADHESIVE DATA FORM.

3.2 Material Listing. Appendix A - METAL DATA SHEETS is a list of metals with brief
information to assist initial selection. These are not the only metals for consideration.
Approximate properties for composites for preferred methods of fabrication are given in
Appendix G - TYPICAL BASIC PROPERTIES OF FIBER-REINFORCED MATERIALS
BASED ON 60% FIBER VOLUME FRACTION EPOXY COMPOSITES.

3.3 Preliminary Working Stresses. If when a metal is first considered only the 0.2% proof for
yield strength is known, the following factors may be used to obtain other working stresses from
the working tensile stress:

Compression without buckling = tension

Shear = 0.6 x tension
Bearing = 1.33 x tension

3.4 Data required for Selected Materials.

3.4.1 General. Name and/or number of material with a brief statement of the primary
characteristics and any patent or proprietary restrictions.

3.4.2 Application. State what the material is used for and the particular properties that
make it desirable.

3.4.3 Physical Properties. Give density, melting range, and average coefficient of
thermal expansion for -18 to 65 C (0 to 150 F).

3.4.4 Elastic Constants. Give at 20 C (68 F) the Modulus of Elasticity, in tension and
compression, and Poisson's ratio. Orthotropic properties should be given to consider the effect
of grain orientation. Variances of more than 5% at 38 C (100 F) should be noted.

3.4.5 Fabrication Recommendations. List any special recommendations for working

with the material.

3.4.6 Ballistic Damage. It should be shown that any material or construction is

satisfactory with respect to ballistic damage. An assessment may be made on the basis of impact
tests, fracture toughness, notch tensile/compression tests, drop tests, and field shooting trials
followed by test loading.

9
3.5 Data Required for Selected Metals.

3.5.1 Physical Condition Designation. List and define all common heat-treatment
designations.

3.5.2 Chemical Composition. Give the maximum and minimum allowable percentage by
weight of alloying elements and the maximum allowable percentage by weight of contaminating
elements.

3.5.3 Mechanical Properties. Minimum properties will be given for the parent metal and,
if they are different, for welds, Heat Affected Zones (HAZ), and, if applicable, for differently
worked forms. Parent-metal properties will be given for the longitudinal direction, in the rolling
or extrusion direction, and, if they differ, for the long-transverse and short-transverse directions
as well as for various thicknesses. In general, ultimate strength, yield strength, and elongation
are guaranteed; however, other mechanical properties must be established and are minimum
properties which can be expected but are not guaranteed.

3.5.3.1 Tensile. Give the 0.2% proof strength, or yield strength, for a 0.2% offset and the
ultimate strength. Give percent elongation in the longitudinal (rolling or extruding) direction
with a 50 mm (1.97 in) gauge length. Testing should be in accordance with ISO/R82, R86, and
R375; EN 10002 PT 5*; ASTM E8; BS 18.

3.5.3.2 Compression. Give the 0.2% proof strength, or yield strength, and the ultimate
strength. Testing should be in accordance with ASTM E9.

3.5.3.3 Bearing. Give the 2% offset bearing strength. Testing for pin bearing should be
in accordance with ASTM E238.

3.5.3.4 Shear. Give the shear strength. Testing should be in accordance with ASTM
B565.

3.5.4 Fatigue Properties. Desirably give minimum stress/number of cycles (S/N) curves
between 103 and 106 cycles with a (mean - 2 x standard deviation) probability of survival on a
log-normal distribution for stress ratios 0, +0.5, -1 for the following specimens as required:

Smooth-base material
Notched-base material
Butt welds
Fillet welds
Connections other than welds

3.5.5 Fracture Data. Compare with other alloys and give the parameters KC and KIC with
details of the test specimen. Testing for KIC should be to ASTM E399. Threshold stress

* DIN 50-145 withdrawn in 1991, replaced by EN 10002 PT 5.

10
intensity Kth and crack propagation data based on the fracture mechanics should be available for
base material and welds/HAZs.

3.5.6 Corrosion Resistance. Briefly compare corrosion resistance with that of other alloys
of the same material. Special corrosion characteristics including the effects of heat treatment,
welding, and aging should be mentioned if they differ greatly from similar alloys.

3.5.7 Stress Corrosion. Briefly compare with other similar alloys. Give the threshold
stress below which stress-corrosion cracks do not initiate for smooth specimens, preferably in
four-point bending, stating the time, environment, material, grain structure, and specimen
orientation.

3.5.8 Heat Treatment. Give details of any heat-treatment processes pertaining to the
material. Appendix D - INTERNATIONAL TEMPER EQUIVALENTS FOR ALUMINUM
ALLOYS summarizes heat treatment equivalents for the three member countries.

3.5.9 Welding and Joining. Give recommended welding electrodes and any special joint-
preparation requirements.

3.5.10 Brittle Fracture. It should be shown that the material, as used in the structure, will
not be subject to brittle fracture at the required low temperature by quoting nationally accepted
tests or the transition temperature if applicable.

3.6 Data Required for Selected Composites.

3.6.1 General. This section includes glass, aramid, and carbon composites. It considers
only the properties of the most commonly used cured composite for preferred methods of
manufacture and adhesives. Individual properties of fibers and resin matrix should be entered on
the Data Sheet shown in Appendix E - COMPOSITE MATERIALS DATA FORM, if available.
Although these properties determine composite characteristics, they are no more than a guide to
the expected composite material property levels. Physical and mechanical property data should
be measured at 23 2 C (73 4 F) and 50 5% relative humidity (RH). Mechanical property
data should also be measured at temperature and humidity conditions representative of severe
operation, 50 2 C (122 4 F) and 85 5% RH, or a higher or lower* condition, if specified.
Preconditioning is required to achieve the equilibrium humidity content and temperature
consistent with the test temperature and moisture (see ASTM D618 on preconditioning).

3.6.2 Composite Description. Sufficient detail should be specified to define the

composite constituents uniquely either in terms of manufacturers' coding or to accepted
specifications. Layup geometry, number of plies, volume fraction, and final thickness of the
composite should be given.

3.6.3 Processing. The method of producing the cured composite form should be stated
with details of curing times, pressures, and temperature cycles.

* STANAG 2831 withdrawn.

11
 3.6.4 Physical Properties.

3.6.4.1 The density, fiber volume fraction, and void content should be stated and
determined in accordance with appropriate published standards. Calibrated alternative methods
are accepted.

3.6.4.2 Thermal expansion coefficient related to the operating temperature range should
be given.

3.6.4.3 Equilibrium moisture content and relative linear dimensional changes should be
determined for the most severe operating conditions (temperature and humidity). This
information should be used to specify preconditioning for test specimens. The glass transition
temperature for the composite should also be given.

3.6.5 Basic Lamina Mechanical Properties.

3.6.5.1 The level of mechanical properties depends upon the strain rate and the physical
state of the material in respect to temperature and moisture content. Properties for design should
include measurement at the minimum median and maximum operating temperatures and show
changes associated with moisture pick up. Preconditioning test conditions should be as specified
in paragraph 3.6.1. Property data should be provided for individual lamina and for the (laminat-
ed) composite. The required lamina properties are identified in Appendix E - COMPOSITE
MATERIALS DATA FORM, and include tensile and compressive strength parallel and
orthogonal to the fiber direction and inplane shear strength (see ASTM D3039, D3410, and
D3518). Minimum guaranteed fiber strain must also be reported. Interlaminar shear strength (or
transverse shear strengths for other than laminated composites) should be measured by a
procedure to be agreed upon.

3.6.5.2 In addition, longitudinal, transverse, and shear moduli and Poisson's ratios should
be obtained for the individual lamina. Longitudinal tensile, compression, flexural strength and
Poisson's ratios should be obtained on full thickness (laminated) composite coupons with the
stacking sequence to be utilized in production at severe operating conditions only as specified in
paragraph 3.6.1. Geometric discontinuities should be considered.

3.6.5.3 The mean value and standard deviation of each property should be determined
from a minimum sample size of 6.

3.6.5.4 Application of any failure criteria to establish a composite strength analysis for a
multiaxial laminate in either a uniaxial or multiaxial stress state requires a coherent set of basic
ply properties as given in Appendix E - COMPOSITE MATERIALS DATA FORM. Test
methods to be based on appropriate published standards.

3.6.6 Fatigue Properties.

12
 3.6.6.1 Fatigue properties should be determined by test on appropriate specimens (ASTM
D3039 provides specimen information). Test conditions should be designed to avoid heat build-
up (ASTM D3479).

3.6.6.2 A testing program can be performed which provides minimum S/N curves
between 103 and 106 cycles with a 97.5% probability of survival on a log normal distribution for
stress ratios of 0, +0.5, -1.

3.6.6.3 Alternatively, testing can be performed for the most severe operational stress
envelope, i.e. between the minimum and maximum transient stress to which the component may
be subjected, increased for a number of cycles equal to 1.8 times the design life.

3.6.6.4 In either case, tests should be performed on full thickness specimens with the
design stacking sequence for both smooth specimens and specimens containing geometric
discontinuities (holes and/or notches) representative of design items.

3.6.6.5 Correctly loaded components should be tested.

3.6.7 Impact Susceptibility. Determine threshold of impact induced interlaminar damage

by drop weight tests; specification to be agreed upon.

3.6.8 Stress Rupture/Creep. Determine to agreed specifications constant stress versus

time curves for selected critical material stress cases. Creep behavior should be investigated at
the maximum service temperature. The tensile specimen (ASTM D3039) is appropriate for both
creep and stress rupture testing.

3.7 Data Required for Selected Adhesives.

3.7.1 General. This section relates to adhesives for structural composite bonded joints and
metal attachments. The performance of adhesives can be significantly influenced by the prior
preparation of the surfaces bonded. Guaranteed minimum strength properties must be
established by testing representative joints. Typical data requirements are indicated in Appendix
F - ADHESIVE DATA FORM. Test conditions (temperature and humidity) and preconditioning
should be as specified in paragraph 3.6.1 for composites. Correctly loaded joints should be
tested.

3.7.2 Adhesive System Description. Described by giving the manufacturer's coding and
supplier and the form of adhesive used (liquid, paste, or film). The nature of the adhesive should
be stated giving intended application (adherends and service environments). The system
components should be listed including compatible primer systems.

3.7.3 Processing Requirements. Indicate surface preparation, assembly methods, and

pressures and time/temperature cycles to obtain stated properties. Minimum curing temperatures
should be given and range of allowable bond line thickness stated.

3.7.4 Physical Properties of Cured Adhesive.

13
 State the glass transition temperature.
State the transverse electrical resistivity.

3.7.5 Mechanical Properties. The level of mechanical properties may be affected by the
strain rate of testing and the physical condition of the bonded system. Mechanical property data
should be developed at the conditions defined in paragraph 3.6.1. The following data should be
reported: tensile and shear load, and peel strength; tensile and shear moduli, elastic, and inelastic
tensile and shear strain limits. Application of the data in Appendix F - ADHESIVE DATA
FORM, to selected joint configurations should take into account stress concentrations arising
from geometrical factors and adherend stiffness. Test methods should be in accordance with
appropriate published standards, such as ASTM E229 (shear strength and modulus), ASTM
D897 (tensile strength), ASTM D1876 or D3167 (peel strength).

3.7.6 Fatigue Properties. Fatigue properties of many adhesives are particularly sensitive
to cycling rate and should be determined under conditions close to that of use under the most
severe operating environment. The following fatigue tests should be performed: tension, shear,
and peel. Either minimum S/N to failure curves should be developed or fatigue tests specific to
the design load envelope should be carried out as specified in paragraph 3.6.6. Adhesive fatigue
properties may be compared using standard test methods but allowance for geometrical stress
concentrations should be made on other joint geometries and testing of representative test
coupons is essential.

3.7.7 Environmental Degradation. A ranking of the expected durability of selected

adhesive/adherend surfaces should be given in terms of wedge test crack propagation or stressed
lap shear test, but specific factors can be obtained only by testing representative joint details.
Full details of surface preparation techniques should be given. The rate of environmental
degradation will also depend on the specific geometry and stress system applied to the bonded
joint.

3.7.8 Creep Behavior. To be based on ASTM D2294 or British Standards 3250 Part C7
with preference for a thick adherend single-lap shear specimen. Creep behavior should be
investigated at the maximum service temperature.

14
 IV. DESIGN PARAMETERS

4.1 General. The design parameters below are to be used unless modified by the equipment
requirement/specification. Generally, the parameters represent the worst conditions achieved
during normal service, and average usage should not be so severe. In some instances a desirable
alternative parameter is given, and it should be regarded as an improvement that the designer
should try to achieve. The designer will have to balance cost and effect with the achievement of
desirable parameters, and it may not be possible to achieve all parameters. Abnormal service
parameters should be covered by special tests on the equipment. Parameters are given for clear
span bridges, piers, floating bridges, and rafts.

4.2 Clear-Span Bridge and General Parameters.

4.2.1 Minimum Clear Roadway Width (STANAG 2021 edition 6):

Military Load Class (MLC) One-Lane Two-Lane (Equal MLC)

4-12 2.75 m (9 ft) 5.50 m (18 ft)

13-30 3.35 m (11 ft) 5.50 m (18 ft)

31-70 4.00 m (13 ft, 2 in) 7.30 m (24 ft)

71-100 4.50 m (14 ft, 9 in) 8.20 m (27 ft)

Above 100 5.00 m (16 ft, 5 in) Not allowed

4.2.2 Truss Bridge Roadway Width. For through truss bridges with exterior curbs: Face
of curb to inside of truss to be 250 mm (10 in) minimum from 300 mm (12 in) above the deck to
the top of the truss.

4.2.3 Footwalk Width. Width will be a minimum of 650 mm (2 ft, 2 in).

4.2.4 Trackway width for MLC 31 and above. Minimum width for single trackway will
be 1,525 mm (5 ft). Maximum center gap will be 950 mm (3 ft, 1 in). (Dimensions must be
checked to suit all vehicles expected to use the trackway.)

4.2.5 Bank Conditions.

4.2.5.1 For Assault {Close Support} bridges, the height difference, h, between home and
far banks is essentially 1 in 10 (10%) and desirably 1 in 5 (20%) multiplied by the length of the
span up to a maximum of 6.0 m (19 ft, 8 in). For Assault {Close Support} bridging, h, is
measured from the home bank slope projection.

4.2.5.2 For Support {General Support} bridges, the maximum height difference, h,
between home and far banks is essentially 1 in 10 (10%) multiplied by the length of the span up
to a maximum of 3.0 m (9 ft, 10 in). For Support {General Support} bridges, h, is measured
from the home bank horizontal projection.

15
 4.2.5.3 For safety purposes to prevent wheeled vehicles slipping sideways off the bridge,
transverse deck slopes between any two points on the bridge deck surface under live load shall
not exceed 1 in 10 (10%). This is known as the serviceability limit. In the case of twin trackway
bridges with structural infill decking, this is considered part of the bridge deck surface.

4.2.5.4 Consistent with the serviceability limit, it must be possible for bridges and the
launching system to accept uniform transverse slopes*, or steps, bumps or depressions
equivalent to a transverse slope, anywhere on the bankseat supports of the following gradients:

Assault {Close Support} Bridges (CSBs) 5.0% (1 in 20)

Support {General Support} Bridges (GSBs) 2.0% (1 in 50)
Line of Communication (LOC) Bridges 0.5% (1 in 200)

*Note: It must also be considered that near and far banks can have like or opposing
transverse slopes, i.e., +1 in 20 near bank, 1 in 20 far bank.

4.2.5.5 For multi-span bridges (including combination bridges and bridges supported on a
fixed or floating pier), the same conditions for transverse slopes or irregularities must be
considered to be applicable at the intermediate supports. For continuous floating bridges (e.g.
Ribbon or M3) the same transverse bankseat criteria shall apply to the supporting ramps
providing access and egress to the roadway.

4.2.6 Bank Bearing Pressure.

4.2.6.1 Assault {Close Support} bridges shall be designed to bear uniformly on a

projected length of 0.75m (2 ft, 6 in) measured from the extreme ramp toe. Under such
conditions maximum bearing pressures should not exceed 380 kN/m2 (4.0 tons/ft2) under any
live load up to and including MLC70 (T and W), including an allowance of 1.2V, dead load and
the most significant secondary load. In extreme conditions, allowing for bridge movement, ramp
bearing length can reduce to 0.25m (10 in) before reinstatement, but corresponding pressures
shall not exceed 1,140 kN/m2 (11.9 tons/ft2) under the same load.

4.2.6.2 Support {General Support} bridges shall be designed to bear uniformly on a

projected length of 1.0m measured from the effective end of bridge (which might exclude
approach ramps). Under such conditions maximum bearing pressures should not exceed 425
kN/m2 (4.4 tons/ft2) under any live load up to and including MLC70 (T and W), allowing for the
dynamic effects of multiple vehicles, dead load and the most significant secondary load. In
extreme conditions, allowing for bridge movement, effective bearing length can reduce to 0.5m
(1 ft, 8 in) before reinstatement, but corresponding pressures shall not exceed 850 kN/m2 (8.9
tons/ft2) under the same load.

4.2.6.3 In special circumstances involving combination (overlapping) bridging or

overbridging, extreme bearing pressures shall not exceed 40,000 kN/m2 (5,800 psi) and the
effects of local crushing must be considered at the interface between structures. The same
consideration of local damage must be given to bearing on hard, high spots when bridges are

16
supported on the nominal full bearing area as defined above.

4.2.7 Depth of Bridge at Ramp Toe:

Condition Assault {Close Support} Support {General Support}

Bridge Bridge
Maximum 100 mm 75 mm

Desirable 50 mm or less Minimum possible

4.2.8 Bridge Deck Slopes. The allowable longitudinal slopes for a bridge with level
supports and no applied loads, Ai, are given in the following table. The transverse slope allowing
for the support conditions of paragraph 4.2.5 and the unfactored fully eccentric vehicle load, V,
with impact should not exceed 1 in 10.

Description Assault {Close Support} Support {General Support}

Bridge Bridge
Short ramp or sloping end of bridge up to 3 m (9 ft 10 in)
long:
Maximum 1 in 5 1 in 7
Desirable 1 in 7 or less 1 in 10 or less
Ramp or sloping end of bridge longer than 3 m (9 ft 10 in):
Maximum 1 in 6 1 in 9
Desirable 1 in 10 or less 1 in 14 or less
Change of slope on bridge other than at sloping ends:
Maximum 1 in 6 1 in 10
Desirable 1 in 10 or less 1 in 20 or less

4.2.9 Wind Velocity and Pressure. The wind velocities and pressures are the maximum
values to which the bridge should be designed:

Wind Velocity (v) Wind Pressure (WP)

Design Condition m/s (knots) kN/m2 (lbf/ft2)
During construction /launching 15 29.2 0.138 2.88

On bridge and crossing vehicle 20 38.8 0.245 5.11

On bridge alone 30 58.3 0.552 11.51

4.2.10 Vehicle Design Crossing Speed. Essential speeds are the maximum speeds under
normal field conditions and the speeds up to which bridges must be tested:

Vehicle Design Speed Up to MLC 30 Above MLC 30

Essential 25 km/h (15 mi/h) 15 km/h (9 mi/h)

Desirable 40 km/h (25 mi/h) 25 km/h (15 mi/h)

17
 4.2.11 Impact. Vehicle induced loads will be increased by the following factors to cover
crossing speeds up to 25 km/h (15 mi/h):

Impact Factors
Bending Moment
Location and Deflection Shear Force
Interior 1.15 --

Ramp 1.2 1.2

It should be noted that these values cover modern suspension vehicles for the desirable velocity
and old suspension and high pitch inertia vehicles for the essential velocity according to
paragraph 4.2.10. The given factors are typical values so that for extreme cases a more detailed
investigation for design is recommended. An increase of 15% for impact will be added to the
bridge dead load, D, and launching equipment if appropriate during launching.

The maximum included static load multiplied by the impact factor results in the maximum
induced dynamic load.

4.2.12 Mud Load (M). The following load will be used when calculating the effects of mud
on the roadway surface: 0.75 kN/m2 (15.67 lbf/ft2).

4.2.13 Snow and Ice Load (S). The following load will be used if it has a greater effect
than the mud load, M (300 mm (12 in) of loose snow of areal density): 0.37 kN/m2 (7.7 lbf/ft2).

4.2.14 Footwalk Loading (F). Footwalks are those structures which are attached to
existing structures e.g. as add-on kits or stand alone structures. Footwalks are intended primarily
for the support of crossing troops and secondarily in support of local pedestrian traffic for local
commerce. Loadings will include the fully outfitted combat soldier and/or could additionally
include bicycles, motorcycles, all terrain vehicles, livestock and horses. The value of the design
loading to be considered on the footwalk could be adjusted depending on the intended use of the
structure and the ability to restrict types of traffic.

4.2.14.1 The main members of the footwalk shall be designed for a maximum live
loading of 4.0 kN/m2 (83.56 lbf/ft2) for spans up to 30 m (98 ft, 5 in). The load will then be
reduced linearly to 3.0 kN/m2 (62.67 lbf/ft2) for spans up to 60 m (196 ft, 10 in). For spans
beyond 60 m (196 ft, 10 in), the load will remain constant. Main members shall be defined as
those members, which comprise the main structural elements of the footwalk, e.g., girders,
trusses, arches etc.

4.2.14.2 The secondary members shall be designed for a maximum live load of 4.0
kN/m2 at all spans. Secondary members shall include decks, supporting floor systems,
secondary stringers, floorbeams and connections to the main members.

4.2.14.3 The force to be considered for a laden soldier will be 1.27 kN (286.65 lbf),
which is the combination of the weight of the individual soldier at 0.88 kN (198.45 lbf) and the
weight of his backpack at 0.39 kN (88.2 lbf).

18
4.3 Combination Bridging.

4.3.1 Combination bridging may be used in wet or dry gaps where the clear span to be
bridged exceeds the span capability of a single bridge system. In wet gaps, the use of
combination bridging into water shall be permissible under the following conditions:

Maximum surface water speed at mid-stream not to exceed 1.5 m/s (2.9 knots).
Under bridge dead load alone, water level shall not to be within 100mm (4 in) of any
trafficable deck surface.
Combination bridges must not be launched unless there is some non-metallic interface
between the bridges to spread the anticipated live load and prevent slipping in a wet environment
under live vehicle trafficking.

4.3.2 The longitudinal slope of any span deployed in a combination must not exceed the
capability of a simply supported single span under the same load condition. The longitudinal
slope is defined as the slope of an imaginary line joining the home and far bank toe pins of a
single span bridge.

4.3.3 For the purpose of designing combination bridges, the launch plane of the launch
vehicle is defined as the nominal extension of the surface on which the launch vehicle tracks or
wheels are located.

4.3.4 Under dead load conditions, acute angles between the underside bottom chord of a
subsequent span, and the deck of the underlying span are to be greater than 3 degrees to allow
for subsequent deflection under live load, and avoid the possibility of knife-edge loading.

4.3.5 Ingress and egress should allow vehicles a straight run on and off the bridge to
minimize the need for slewing.

4.3.6 The launching of the first bridge of a combination bridge is restricted to a transverse
slope of 1 in 20 (5%). If opposing bankseat cross slopes result in a combined angular deviation
of more than 1 in 20 (under dead load), instability could result at bridge intersections.

4.3.7 Conditions of the bed of the river or gap must be determined if the combination
bridge is to be laid with minimal risk. If any doubt exists as to the condition of the bed, a survey
involving divers must be undertaken. The bed should be free from obstructions and firm enough
to support the bridge toes.

4.3.8 The depth of any silt or soft material must be known, and some assessment made of
likely sinkage. Whilst a uniform bed is desirable, it must be accepted that live load trafficking or
scouring from hydrodynamic forces can produce settlement. The limiting cross slope and
irregularities for bridges used in combination shall be no worse than the limiting support
conditions prevailing for simply supported single spans.

4.3.9 The toes of a second or third span in a combination might be restricted to specific

19
locations along the length of the first bridge. This might be necessary to avoid structural
overloading of the first span in shear near the ramps, or in bending as a result of the additional
dead load of subsequent bridges.

4.3.10 The maximum lateral misalignment permitted between bridges shall be no more than
75mm.

4.3.11 For second and subsequent spans, due account must be taken of possible bridge
movement as a result of vehicle crossings, particularly if bridges are on a downward longitudinal
slope, the junction between bridges is wet or under water, or likely to be subjected to significant
(>50) crossings.

4.3.12 In order to minimize the need to reinstate combination bridges due to bridge
movement, it is advised that where the overall bridge length allows, the toe is positioned up to
2m (6 ft, 7 in) back from the limiting toe position, measured in the direction opposite to that
trafficking. Alternatively, there should be some system for the anchorage of bridges from under
armor, or the remote attachment of one bridge to another to prevent slippage occurring.

4.3.13 The amount of bridge movement is dependent on various factors and conditions such
as mass of the vehicle, type of vehicle, clear span of the bridge, degree of longitudinal bridge
slope, ground bearing capacity and friction conditions at the supports. Generally, the heavier the
vehicle and the greater the clear span, more bridge movement is to be expected. Bridges must be
reinstated if the anticipated throughput of traffic results in sufficient movement to reduce bearing
areas to minimum safe limits. The minimum safe bankseat bearing length for Close Support
Bridges (CSBs) shall be taken as 0.25m (10 in).

4.4 Piers.

4.4.1 Dimensions.

4.4.1.1 In the absence of a User requirement, the following dimensions are recommended
for the design of piers and trestles which might be installed in wet gaps:

Measurements Assault {Close Support} Bridge Support {General Support} Bridge

Gap Depth:
Essential 4 m (13 ft, 1 in) 7 m (23 ft)
Desirable 5 m (16 ft, 5 in) 12 m (39 ft, 4 in)

Water Depth:
Essential 3 m (9 ft, 10 in) 6 m (19 ft, 8 in)
Desirable 4 m (13 ft, 1 in) 6 m (19 ft, 8 in)

4.4.1.2 In addition, there is to be a minimum clearance of 100mm (4 in) between any

point on the trafficable deck surface and the surface of the water, when the total bridge system is
deployed without live load.

20
 First Span Second Span

Gap
Depth Water
Depth

Overlap
FIGURE 4-1

4.4.1.3 In the case of combination bridges on piers or trestles, due consideration must be
given to the obtuse angle () between bridge deck surfaces (which could affect trafficability), the
acute angle () between the deck of a first span and the undeflected bottom chord of a
subsequent span (which could produce knifeedge loading), and the relative overlap ()
between bridges (which could be reduced with trafficking as a result of bridge movement). See
Figure 4-1.

4.4.1.4 Minimum suggested values for these parameters are:

= 149.0 degrees, = 3.0 degrees, = 0.75 m (2 ft, 6 in)

4.4.2 Grillage Bearing Pressure. Maximum: 160 kN/m2 (1.7 ton/ft2). Sinkage is
acceptable consistent with stability and recovery.

4.4.3 Current Speeds. The current speeds for piers are the same as those given for
floating bridges and rafts (paragraphs 4.5.1).

4.4.4 Pier Support. These should articulate in any direction to allow a longitudinal and
transverse bridge slope of at least 1 in 10 (10%) under live vehicle loading.

4.5 Floating Bridges and Rafts.

4.5.1 Bridging Current Speeds:

Condition Speed
Construction and normal use: 2.5 m/s (4.9 knots)

Unladen equipment survival:

Minimum: 3.5 m/s (6.8 knots)
Desirable: 5.0 m/s (9.7 knots)

21
 4.5.2 Raft Speed Laden:

Condition Speed
Minimum: 2.5 m/s (4.9 knots)

Desirable: 3.5 m/s (6.8 knots)

4.5.3 Worst Case Shallow Water, Fast Current Condition: Midstream: 2 m (6 ft, 7 in)
of water running at 2.5 m/s (4.9 knots).

4.5.4 Worst Case Shallow Water Condition at Bank for Ramp and Flotation: River
bed slopes down 1 in 7 from water's edge.

4.5.5 Bank-Height/Ramp-Elevation Ranges:

Condition Range
Upward:
Minimum +1.5 m (4 ft, 11 in)
Desirable +2.0 m (6 ft, 7 in)
(Relative to water level.)

Downward: Bottom of ramp toe should be level with

bottom of main floating structure.

The ramp slopes on rafts and bridges should not exceed the values given in paragraph 4.2.8
for the worst condition of loading.

If these bank heights are used for launching floating equipment, it is not realistic to combine
them with the worst case shallow water depth in paragraph 4.5.4. A water depth of 2.0 m (6 ft, 7
in) can be assumed 8.0 m (26 ft, 3 in) from the waters edge.

4.5.6 Pontoon Bottom-Skin Load. The pontoon bottom-skin load should not exceed 96
kN/m2 (2,005 lbf/ft2).

4.5.7 Minimum Freeboard. The following minimum freeboard values with the maximum
MLC vehicle load(s) fully eccentric are considered adequate for normal equipment
configurations at the design current speed. See paragraph 4.5.1.

Minimum Freeboard of Pontoon

Bow Side
Floating Support mm (in) mm (in)
Pneumatic Floats 100 (4) 0 (0)

Rigid Open Pontoons 225 (9) 125 (5)

Rigid Closed Pontoons 150 (6) 100 (4)

Rigid, Continuous Closed Pontoons 50 (2) 0 (0)

22
 4.5.8 Trim. A floating bridge or raft with a vehicle at permitted eccentricity should not
trim so that the deck slope is more than 1 in 20 under the worst permitted hydrodynamic
conditions.

4.6 Typical Vehicle Data for Design.

Height of Height of
Center of Gravity (CG) Side Wind Surface Center of Pressure
MLC m (in) m2 (ft2) m (in)
4 1.02 (40.2) 7.32 (78.8) 1.18 (46.5)
8 1.05 (41.3) 8.23 (88.6) 1.20 (47.2)
12 1.07 (42.1) 9.13 (98.3) 1.23 (48.4)
16 1.09 (42.9) 10.04 (108.1) 1.25 (49.2)
20 1.12 (44.1) 10.94 (117.8) 1.28 (50.4)
24 1.14 (44.9) 11.85 (127.6) 1.30 (51.2)
30 1.18 (46.5) 13.33 (143.5) 1.34 (52.8)
Tracked

40 1.24 (48.8) 15.47 (166.5) 1.40 (55.1)

50 1.30 (51.2) 17.74 (191.0) 1.47 (57.9)
60 1.36 (53.5) 20.00 (215.3) 1.53 (60.2)
70 1.42 (55.9) 22.26 (239.6) 1.59 (62.6)
80 1.48 (58.3) 24.53 (264.0) 1.65 (65.0)
90 1.54 (60.6) 26.79 (288.4) 1.72 (67.7)
100 1.60 (63.0) 29.06 (312.8) 1.78 (70.1)
120 1.72 (67.7) 33.59 (361.6) 1.90 (74.8)
150 1.90 (74.8) 40.45 (435.4) 2.09 (82.3)
4 2.40 (94.5) 6.12 (65.9) 2.20 (86.6)
8 2.40 (94.5) 12.24 (131.8) 2.20 (86.6)
12 2.40 (94.5) 20.24 (217.9) 2.20 (86.6)
16 2.40 (94.5) 24.17 (260.2) 2.20 (86.6)
20 2.40 (94.5) 32.66 (351.5) 2.20 (86.6)
24 2.40 (94.5) 38.10 (410.1) 2.20 (86.6)
30 2.40 (94.5) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
Wheeled

40 2.40 (94.5) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)

50 2.40 (94.5) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
60 2.40 (94.5) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
70 2.20 (86.6) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
80 2.00 (78.7) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
90 2.00 (78.7) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
100 2.00 (78.7) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
120 2.00 (78.7) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)
150 2.00 (78.7) 45.00 (484.4) 2.20 (86.6)

4.7 Temperature and Environment. The environmental effects due to the required categories
must be considered . Thermal stresses and long-term degradation due to temperature and
humidity must be considered.

STANAG 2831 withdrawn.

23
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

24
 V. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

5.1 General. The designer will use the most critical loading obtained from paragraph 5.3,
Military Bridge Loads, using the values given here or detailed in Section IV, DESIGN
PARAMETERS and the combinations given in paragraph 5.4, Load Combinations. The worst
support conditions must also be taken into account.

5.2 Deflections. Deflections are not limited directly by this code but must be considered when
they cause changes in loading, affect fit or alignment, or affect the use of equipment.

5.3 Military Bridge Loads.

5.3.1 Dead Load (D). The structure dead load, D, shall consist of the weight of the
complete bridge for the structure in place or of the appropriate bridge components.

5.3.2 Vehicle Load (V).

5.3.2.1 The vehicle load, V, is represented by the hypothetical vehicle of the required
load class depicted in STANAG 2021 (see Appendix C - CHARACTERISTICS OF
HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES
AND BRIDGES). The most critical loads induced by any of the following with the impact
factor will be used:

The hypothetical tracked vehicle.

The hypothetical wheeled vehicle.
The hypothetical axle load.
The hypothetical single-wheeled loads.

If a vehicle other than the hypothetical STANAG vehicle is used, problems will be encountered
with variations in load class or the load to give the correct bending moment or shear. These
occur due to changes in bridge length and vehicle width.

5.3.2.2 For tracked vehicles, the load will be applied as follows for each track: For
Military Load Class (MLC) 30 and above, there will be 6 contact areas and for MLCs lower than
30 there will be 5 contact areas. These represent the road wheels and must be fitted into the
hypothetical track length allowing for the contact area length. The width of each contact area is
taken as the hypothetical vehicle track width and the contact area length along the track is taken
so that the working load bearing pressure:

MLC
pb = 0.6 + N/mm2
100

If the number of contact areas is reduced or increased, pb must be changed accordingly. For
wheeled vehicles, the wheel load will be applied on a contact area, with the nominal tire width
and load of the hypothetical vehicle (Appendix C CHARACTERISTICS OF
HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES

25
AND BRIDGES) which will produce a contact pressure of 1.25 times the tire pressure at
working load not to exceed 1100 kN/m2 (11.2 kp/cm2, 160 lbf/in2).

5.3.2.3 Consideration should be given to changes in individual wheel and tank-track

bogie loads as vehicles pitch or negotiate changes in slope.

5.3.3 Mud Load (M). The mud load, M, in the design parameters will be considered over
the roadway area. Reductions in loading may be made for proven self-cleaning decks.
Accumulations of mud on vehicles will not be considered. It is assumed that mud is removed
from bridges before they are recovered or retrieved. If this is not possible, a percentage of the
mud load, M, should be included in the weights for retrieval purposes. This percentage is a
function of the particular bridge design and will range from 10 to 25% of the total. The impact
factor should be considered in addition.

5.3.4 Snow and Ice Load (S). The snow and ice load, S, in the design parameters is
applied uniformly over the bridge and flotation plan area. The load, S, will not be applied unless
the effect is greater than the mud load, M, in which case it will be used instead of the mud load,
M. Accumulation of snow and ice on vehicles will not be considered.

5.3.5 Impact. To provide for impact on clear-span (fixed) bridges, the vehicle induced
load, V, will be increased as required by the design parameters. The impact factor will be
applied to the bridge dead load, D, for the bridge launching condition only as required by the
design parameters. For floating bridges, the impact factor in the center section will be 1.05 for
ramp (landing bay) slope of 0.0. It may increase to 1.3 for either the bending moment at higher
crossing speeds or at more extreme ramp slopes for the shear force in the ramp. These effects
can extend up to one vehicle length towards the center of the bridge and should be investigated.

5.3.6 Eccentricity. Bridge design will provide for normal crossing of the load, V,
anywhere on the roadway surface. The critical position will be that which produces the greatest
stress conditions as determined by static analysis. Bridge cross slopes and deflections and
movement of the vehicle center of gravity (CG) must be allowed for.

5.3.7 Spacing. Design will be based on a minimum clear distance between vehicle ground
contact points of 30.5 m (100 ft) or more if critical during the crossing of rated loads.

5.3.8 Braking and Acceleration. Braking and acceleration forces, B, of the braking factor
times vehicle load, V, will be included as a longitudinal horizontal load. Tracked vehicle
skewing forces of 0.1 times vehicle load, V, will be included as a transverse horizontal load
(braking and skewing forces are not additive). The vehicle load, V, does not include the impact
factor in these cases. These loads are assumed to act at the deck surface. The braking factor is
reduced for more than one vehicle on a bridge as follows:

No. of Vehicles on Bridge Total Braking Factor

1 0.65
2 0.9
3 1.15

26
Braking factors are bridge system and material dependent. The braking factor for materials other
than between aluminum and rubber must be determined through testing.

5.3.9 Footwalk. Footwalks will carry the uniformly distributed load, F, shown in the
design parameters.

5.3.10 Curbs {Kerbs}. If provided, curbs will be of sufficient height and strength to
restrain the maximum wheeled vehicle from sliding off the bridge at a 1 in 10 (10%) side slope
and zero coefficient of friction. For tracked vehicles, curbs will only be considered a
psychological restraint.

5.3.11 Wind.

5.3.11.1 The appropriate wind load, W, will be applied to the bridge during
construction, launching, and recovery; to the completed bridge and vehicle(s) during crossing;
and to the bridge alone (maximum wind load). Wind velocities and pressures are given in the
design parameters (Section IV, DESIGN PARAMETERS).

5.3.11.2 The wind pressure, WP, is determined from the following formulas:

WP = 0.613v2 N/m2 with v in m/s.

0.0625v2 kp/m2 with v in m/s.
0.00347v2 lbf/ft2 with v in knots.

5.3.11.3 Allowance must be made for the type of bridge construction, drag, shadow
effects, and angle of incidence. It may be necessary to consider a lower MLC vehicle/maximum
wind area in Section IV, DESIGN PARAMETERS. The following drag coefficients should be
used unless more accurate values are established: Bridge and launching structure, 1.6 and
vehicles, 1.4.

5.3.12 Additional Loads on Floating Equipment. The following additional loads and
conditions must be considered for floating bridges, rafts, and causeways:

Grounding pontoons on one side including the effect of vehicle load on the structure, the
bottom-skin load given in the design parameters, and the possibility of bridging between two
groundings.

Possible locking of articulating connections.

Increasing stress resulting from the fact that on a floating bridge a single vehicle may impose
a greater stress than several vehicles at the minimum spacing, and there may be a critical
spacing and/or speed related to the natural crossing water wavelength or band-reflected wave
trough.

27
 5.3.12.1 On a raft the vehicle loads, V, may be concentrated with no spacing and
should be considered stationary, neglecting impact.

5.3.12.2 Drag is the horizontal component of hydrodynamic force, Q. For a raft this
force includes the propulsion force which may act in any direction. For a floating bridge where
propulsion units or anchors counteract drag, the following effects must be allowed: failure of
alternate propulsion units or anchors; failure of alternate anchors, if the anchor spacing is not
less than 14.0 m (45 ft, 11 in); or failure of all anchors. This assumes the remaining propulsion
units or anchors can take the increased load. This effect is also considered to cover the effect of
floating debris on unprotected structures.

5.3.12.3 Draw down is the vertical component of the hydrodynamic force, Q, caused
by the shallow-water, fast-current effect.

5.3.12.4 The hydrodynamic forces, Q, depend on the configuration of the equipment

and the hydrodynamic conditions. Such forces should be determined by theoretical analysis or
by model tests. The design parameters give some guidance to hydrodynamic conditions. The
hydrodynamic forces, Q, can be increased by the following effects: (1) interference of flow
caused by little or no clear space between pontoons, increasing the flow velocity under the
pontoons and possibly the upstream head; and (2) longitudinal wave formation initiated by
vehicles crossing, causing loss of water under the inshore pontoon.

5.3.12.5 The unbalanced load due to ice forming from spray or during launch shall be
accounted for by multiplying the exposed surface area to one side of the centerline times 27
N/m2 (2.75 kp/m2, 0.56 lbf/ft2). This represents an ice load of 3 mm (0.12 in) thickness.

5.3.13 Pier Load. A pier shall be considered as a clear-span bridge component allowing for
the hydrodynamic loads at the specified currents speeds. The current direction should be
allowed to deviate 20.0 from the normal line of approach.

5.4 Load Combinations. See paragraph 2.2, Symbols, for definition of symbols. See Section
VI, SAFETY for details of the functions below.

5.4.1 Clear-Span Bridges.

5.4.1.1 During construction, launching, and recovery:

P = R(D, W, M)

Launch drive loads and working parties must also be considered.

5.4.1.2 In Place:

For normal bridge use, P = R(D, V, W, M, B, F, S)

For unloaded bridge survival, P = R(D, W, M, S)

28
Survival is no permanent set or overturning.

5.4.1.3 Bridges with Piers. In addition, the horizontal components of the hydrodynamic
force, Q, must be considered in the above load combinations.

5.4.2 Floating Bridges and Rafts.

5.4.2.1 During construction, launching, and recovery:

P = R(D, Q, W)

5.4.2.2 In Place:

For normal use, P = R(D, V, Q, W, M, S, B, F)

For unloaded survival, P = R(D, Q, W, M, S)

29
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

30
 VI. SAFETY

6.1 General. Safety is covered as follows: derivation of the design load; safety coefficients for
working stress; flotation and stability; fatigue safety factor; and safety against overturning or
rotation.

6.2 Design Load (P). The design load, P, is derived as follows using the appropriate load
combination of dead load, D, and applied loads, A1, A2, in order of decreasing severity (where A1
is the largest of any secondary loads):

P = D + A1 + A2

This means that all loads after the third are ignored. They are generally not significant when
compared with A1, and all the loads are unlikely to reach extreme values together. Vertical and
transverse load cases are to be considered as these may have different orders of loads. Similarly
there may be different orders of loads for different components. For preliminary analysis, dead
load, D, and vehicle load, V, may be factored by 1.15 at Military Load Class (MLC) 30 to cover
all other loads. For higher load classes, this factor can be linearly reduced down to 1.075 at
MLC 60 and above.

6.3 Safety Coefficients and Combined Stresses for Metal.

6.3.1 Allowable Stresses. The design load, P, will not cause stresses exceeding the
following appropriate values.

6.3.1.1 Bending and/or Tension. The lesser of the following will be used:

Ultimate Strength 0.2% Proof Stress or Yield Stress

or
1.5 1.33

6.3.1.2 Shear. The value from 6.3.1.1 multiplied by 0.6.

6.3.1.3 Bearing. The value from 6.3.1.1 multiplied by 1.33.

6.3.1.4 Buckling. Where failure can occur because of buckling, the following allowable
stress will be used:

Buckling Stress
1.5

6.3.2 Combined Stresses.

6.3.2.1 Calculation is based on linear elastic theory.

31
 6.3.2.2 Combined axial stresses due to bending and axial tension or compression, or
additive axial stresses due to bending in two planes at right angles will satisfy linear
superposition:

(Actual Axial Stresses due to Design Load, x) Allowable Stress

For compression, buckling may also have to be checked.

6.3.2.3 Yielding Theories of Failure:

For materials with ductile behavior, Octahedral Shearing Stress Theory will be used:

v = x2 x y + y2 + 3 s2

v may not be greater than 0.9 times the allowable stresses.

For material with brittle behavior, Maximum Principle Stress Theory will be used:

( + y ) ( y ) + 4 s2
2

v =
x x

v may not be greater than the allowable stresses.

6.3.3 Limit State Design (LSD) (Provisional). Structures will satisfy both the Overload
Check and Ultimate Check, as defined in Appendix I - LIMIT STATE DESIGN (Provisional).

6.4 Safety Coefficients at Working Load (P) for Composites and Adhesives.

6.4.1 Safety Coefficients for Working Conditions for Composites. The design load, P,
shall not cause stresses or strains exceeding the following appropriate values.

6.4.2 Allowable Strain. Under the maximum working load, the strain in any fiber direction
should not exceed 50% of the minimum guaranteed fiber strain.

6.4.3 Multiaxial Stresses. The stress level in a lamina should be limited based on an
appropriate lamina failure criterion, incorporating a safety margin. The Tensor Polynomial
Hoffman-Hill criteria or Tsai-Wu criterion as given next may be used. Alternative criteria must
be shown to be appropriate prior to application. It might be necessary to consider other than first
ply failure:

1.5 (T11 + T22) + 1.52(T1112 + T2222 + T3332 + 2T1212) 1

where 1.5 is the safety factor using A-values. If A-values have not been established, 1.2 x 1.5 =
1.8 should be used.

32
 1 = normal stress in fiber direction.

2 = normal stress perpendicular to the fiber in the plane of the lamina.

3 = in-plane shear stress.

T1, T2, etc., are strength parameters determined by test.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1
T1 = , T2 = , T11 = , T22 = , and T33 = 2
XT XC YT YC XT XC YTYC US

T12 cannot be determined unambiguously; T12 may be taken as zero or - 1 2 T11T22 unless there
exists specific information to justify a different value. XT, XC, YT, and YC are the minimum
tensile and compressive failure strength values of the unidirectional layer in directions parallel to
and perpendicular to the fiber directions, and US is the minimum in-plane shear strength. In
addition to the limitation on ply stress level, the tensile and compressive stress levels in the
laminate composite should be limited to 2/3 of the corresponding minimum guaranteed laminate
strength levels.

6.5 Flotation and Stability. The safety of floating bridges and rafts depends also on reserve
flotation and stability. Since these are related to the equipment configuration and usage and to
hydrodynamic conditions, exact rules are difficult to make. The following points should be used
as a guide.

6.5.1 It is desirable that when flotation is damaged or holed, it should be capable of at least
supporting the dead load, D, by compartmentalizing or other means. Flotation must be provided
for more than the working load, P. Approximately 20% reserve of buoyancy in still water is
recommended, but load distribution between flotation units also should be considered.
Buoyancy shape must allow for wave formation.

6.5.2 Components as they are launched, part assemblies, and the final assembly must have
stable equilibrium for normal eccentric loading in the required hydrodynamic conditions. The
individual component must accept a load of 1.35PC placed on the gunwale without becoming
unstable. PC is the component stability design load and must include the relevant portion of the
dead load, D, and the maximum number of soldiers likely to be on the pontoon during
construction. For open components when flooded, the load A1 is a soldier, 0.89 kN (91 kp, 200
lbf) and a pump which can be taken as 0.25 kN (25 kp, 55 lbf) in the absence of a design figure.
For complete equipment supporting a vehicle, the empirical factor of safety on stability is that
the metacentric height of the loaded flotation must be equal to or greater than 5 times the
distance from the equipment centerline to the maximum load class vehicle center of gravity
(CG), when the outside line of the track/tire coincides with the edge of the roadway surface.

6.6 Fatigue Safety Factor. See Section VII, FATIGUE.

33
6.7 Safety Against Overturning or Rotation. During construction, launching, and recovery
there must be a minimum factor of safety against overturning or rotation of 1.20. This is
assumed to include impact.

6.8 Lifting and Anchorage Safety.

6.8.1 Lifting equipment which has unrestricted use must comply with civilian regulations
and be marked with the safe working load.

6.8.2 Lifting eyes should comply with civilian or military regulations and be marked with
the safe working load.

6.8.3 Lifting points designed as part of an equipment must have a minimum safety factor
for proof load of 3.2 for equipment mass from 230 to 9,080 kg (0.25 to 10.0 tons) or 2.3 for
equipment mass more than 9,080 kg (10.0 tons). They must have a minimum safety factor for
ultimate load of 4.8 for equipment mass 230 to 9,080 kg (0.25 to 10.0 tons), or 3.45 for
equipment mass more than 9,080 kg (10.0 tons). Allowance must be made for the number of
points used and/or for the number of items to be lifted. These safety factors include inertia loads
due to acceleration.

6.8.4 Tiedown fittings should have a minimum safety factor for proof load of 4 in the fore
and aft direction, 2 upwards, and 1.5 in the lateral direction. The ultimate load should be 1.5
times the proof load. A requirement for air transport may also have to be considered.

6.8.5 Steel wire rope cables, slings, and assorted fittings not covered by paragraph 6.8.1
should have a minimum safety factor of 3 on the breaking load.

6.9 Air Transport Safety.

6.9.1 Air Portability. Attachment points are required or the facility to provide the
following ultimate restraints: forward 4.0 g (an absolute minimum of 3.0 g) is allowed in
transport aircraft without passengers. All other horizontal directions are 1.5 g and upwards 2.0
g. 44.50 kN (10,000 lbf) ultimate load tiedown chains are used.

6.9.2 Air Dropping. Attachment points are required, or the facility to provide the
following ultimate restraints: forward 4.0 g, upward 5.0 g, and all other directions, 3.0 g. The
medium stressed platform has 22.24 kN (5,000 lbf) ultimate load tiedowns and the heavy
stressed platform, 44.50 kN (10,000 lbf) ultimate.

6.9.3 Helicopter Lift. A single-lift point must take 4.3 g ultimate. Two points must each
take 2.2 g; three points, 1.5 g, and four points, 1.25 g ultimate. Ideally, a four-leg sling should
be used with the lift points as far from the CG as possible and above it. The included angle of
the sling is not to exceed 120. The load should include down draught (maximum value is 0.287
kN/m2, 6.0 lbf/ft2) allowing for fuselage shadow. Drag and negative lift must also be considered.

34
 VII. FATIGUE

7.1 Scope. Design based on Sections V, LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS and VI,
SAFETY may not result in adequate fatigue life. Structures must be checked or designed in
accordance with this section, and the required life must be confirmed by test as required by
Section VIII, TESTING. The material fatigue data requirements are in Section III,
MATERIALS. Section VII, FATIGUE, covers: load spectrum parameters, fatigue design load
range, damage tolerant design, and alternative designs. Appendix H - SAFETY FACTORS ON
REQUIRED LIFE n FOR DESIGN AND TEST, summarizes the safety factors given in this and
the following section, Section VIII, TESTING.

7.2 Load Spectrum Parameters.

7.2.1 The following parameters affect the fatigue life of military bridges and their
launching equipment. The combined parameters, with the frequency of application, form the
load spectrum:

Vehicle spectrum, number of crossings with actual laden vehicle weights

Gap/span spectrum with associated number of crossing vehicles

Number of launches

Impact

Eccentricity

Bridge support conditions

Modular bridge component location variation with each build

7.2.2 Information is not available at present for all of the above parameters, and it is not
possible to obtain load spectra for military bridges. For the present, the life required will be
expressed as a specified number of crossings, n, of the maximum load class over the maximum
span of the bridge and a specified number of launches. No approximate launching load spectrum
has been established.

7.2.3 When modular bridges can be constructed in different forms and various Military
Load Class (MLC)/span combinations, the most fatigue-damaging construction based on normal
usage and stress level should be considered.

7.2.4 Use for different MLCs and bridge spans may be related approximately to the
constant amplitude parameters, stated in paragraph 7.2.2, by the Palmgren-Miner or linear
damage rule:

35
 n1 crossings (cycles at sress 1 ) n2 crossings (cycles at sress 2 )
+ +
N 1 (fatigue life at stress 1 ) N 2 (fatigue life at stress 2 )
ni crossings (cycles at sress i )
... + 1
N i (fatigue life at stress i )

where the stress i and fatigue life Ni are from given MLCs/Spans over which the ni crossings
occur. Preferably, if a realistic load spectrum can be established, a programmed fatigue test on
representative specimens should be used to establish a more accurate damage relationship.

7.3 Fatigue Design Load Range (PFAT). The fatigue design load range, PFAT, is the unfactored
vehicle load, V, multiplied by a dynamic factor covering eccentricity and impact. This dynamic
factor for design can be established by tests or from experience. From current equipment the
following mean factors may be used: clear-span bridges, 1.075; link reinforcement, 1.15; and
floating bridge girders, 1.035. It is assumed that applied loads other than vehicle loads are not
significant and bridge supports are generally level. Certain components may have to be designed
for other load conditions. A factor for launching loads still has to be established.

7.4 Damage Tolerant Design. (Metals only. Special consideration for composites.)

7.4.1 Because of the scatter in fatigue performance and the possibility of use beyond the
required minimum life, there is a risk that a bridge will fail in service. Damage tolerant design
should ensure that when fatigue cracking occurs in service the remaining structure can sustain
the maximum working load P without failure until the damage is detected. A safety factor of 1 is
acceptable. (The same should apply to corrosion or accidental damage.)

7.4.2 The stress range due to the fatigue design load range, PFAT, will not exceed the stress
range from the most suitable minimum curve for stress/number of cycles (S/N) at 1.5n or from
the most suitable mean curve at 1.5 x 1.5n (2.25n). In addition, a check must be made to ensure
that the maximum stress due to the design load, P, does not exceed the lower value of the
allowable stress from Section VI, SAFETY. If possible it should be established that for a
particular detail, the factor should be 1.5 on minimum or 2.25 on mean.

7.4.3 The following design features should be used to achieve damage tolerance:

Selection of materials and stress levels to provide a low rate of crack propagation and long
critical crack length

Provision of multiple load paths

Provision of crack-arresting details

Provision of readily inspectable details

36
 Establish a fracture control plan for safe life and safety critical components which are not fail
safe, giving inspection methods, material data requirements, assumed initial crack size,
required inspection frequency, and the like.

7.4.4 Damage tolerance depends on the level of inspection the user is prepared to apply to
the structure and is not automatically ensured by replaceable components. Inspection of
equipment must be planned to ensure adequate detection and monitoring of damage and to allow
for repair or replacement of components. This must be confirmed during testing (Section VIII,
TESTING). The following factors must be considered:

Location and mode of failure

Remaining structural strength

Detectability and associated inspection technique. (This should be based on the largest flaw
not likely to be detected rather than the smallest it is possible to find.)

Inspection frequency

Expected propagation rate allowing for stress redistribution

Critical crack length before repair or replacement is required

7.4.5 It may be necessary to test fatigue critical components or details in the laboratory,
particularly if suitable minimum curves are not available or the mode of cracking cannot be
anticipated. If there are a limited number of samples, or a structure is tested, so that there is only
one failure from a number of equally loaded samples, the required life factor from the table given
in paragraph 8.8.4 should be used. The test results can be analyzed statistically if there are five
or more samples. The lowest sample life to failure should be at least the minimum design life
(1.5n).

7.4.6 If a component, or a structure subject to the same loading, includes a critical safe life
element (see paragraph 7.5, Alternative Designs) that relies on a damage tolerant element to
indicate that fatigue life is expended, the minimum life of the safe life detail must exceed the
maximum life expected from the damage tolerant detail.

7.5 Alternative Designs. Damage tolerant equipment is preferred. The most economic structure
should be produced if it is designed to a minimum required life and provision is made for regular
inspection. However, there may be cases where regular inspection is not possible or the user
does not wish to take on the commitment and the resulting penalties are acceptable. There are
then three further design systems which can be used. THEY ARE NOT GENERALLY
RECOMMENDED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BUT ARE INCLUDED TO SHOW
THE ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE.

7.5.1 Monitored Usage Safe Life. Regular inspection for fatigue cracks is not required or
may not be possible. The design and test factors for damage tolerant designs are used but to

37
allow for monitoring and cumulative cycle ratio errors, the design life is factored by an
additional 1.5 giving 2.25n on a minimum curve or 3.37n on a mean curve. The component or
equipment must be replaced once monitoring shows the user's required life has been reached.
Repair of fatigue damage is not permissible and damage tolerance is not essential.

7.5.2 Unmonitored Safe Life. If inspection and monitoring use of an equipment or

component is impractical or is not accepted by the user, it is necessary to ensure safety from
possible catastrophic failure by increasing the user's required life by a factor of ten (10n). This
also covers variation in the load spectrum during the life of the equipment. Although the user is
absolved from checking usage of the equipment, only the life requirement of n is guaranteed.
This does not automatically mean a longer life. If the load spectrum is going to be unchanged
through the service life, 6.7n may be used. The stress range due to the fatigue design load range,
PFAT, will not exceed the stress range from the most suitable minimum curve for S/N at 15n (1.5
x 10n) or from the most suitable mean curve at 22.5n (1.52 x 10n). If the load spectrum will be
unchanged, the stress range at 10.0n with a minimum curve or at 15.08n with a mean curve may
be used. In addition, a check must be made to ensure that the stress due to the design load, P,
does not exceed the lower value of the allowable stress from Section VI, SAFETY.

7.5.3 Infinite Life. This is generally recognized as designing to the asymptotic stress from
the most suitable minimum curve for S/N which is taken as that at n = 1x107 cycles for steels or
2 x 106 cycles for aluminum alloys; or the static safety coefficient of 1.33 (paragraph 6.3.1) can
be applied to the stress from the mean curve for material at these cycles. Stress levels must be
checked by test, and a confirmatory fatigue test is desirable. Infinite life is rarely used, as
unmonitored safe life normally satisfies the user's requirement.

7.5.4 Application of fracture mechanics is recommended by assuming an undetected initial

crack at the most unfavorable place (e.g. lug, bolt) of a critical component. This crack must not
exceed the critical crack size during a design life to be defined. Otherwise, a change in design,
material, or inspection is necessary giving a damage tolerant design. If this is not possible, field
inspection is required giving monitored safe usage life design.

38
 VIII. TESTING

8.1 General. Testing must be undertaken in order to confirm that equipment satisfies the
requirements of the user and this Code and to validate the design. Testing should identify all
critical features and failure modes. Testing should also cover environmental effects on
equipment use, in storage and life, especially if degradation is possible. Accelerated testing
should be relatable to actual life. Crossing equipment may not be a single structure but a
complex assembly and the checking of performance must relate to the compatibility of the
equipment as a system. The following tests are considered: requirement test, structural strength
test (static), trafficking, and additional tests for floating equipment, fatigue (dynamic), and test
during production. Troop trials are not covered.

8.2 User Trials/Performance Tests. Equipment must pass the relevant tests and then be
approved by the User, through User trials/performance tests, before acceptance into service.

8.3 Dual Testing. It is preferred that structural strength tests are carried out first on one
equipment, and then concurrently trafficking and the fatigue test are carried out in parallel, as
considered necessary.

8.4 Requirement Tests. Complete systems and components must be tested to show that the user
requirements and the relevant design parameters in this Code are met. Testing will include
construction, launching, recovery, and transport. It must be shown as far as possible that
equipment will perform satisfactorily in field-service conditions and that equipment can be
stored and used in the required environmental conditions.

8.5 Structural Strength Tests.

8.5.1 Equipment and components must be tested to show that there is at least the safety
margin required by this Code between the working load, P, and the onset of unacceptable
permanent distortion in the structure, and that no unforeseen structural behavior occurs. This is
achieved by the overload test. It is essential that an overload test is carried out on complete
structures. It also should be shown that allowable stresses are not exceeded at the working load,
P, in areas free from stress concentrations. It will generally be necessary to carry out vertical
and transverse loading tests. It is desirable that an ultimate load test is carried out on critical
components and preferably on complete structures.

8.5.2 The test load used will be the most severe combination of loads for which the
components or structure has been designed. Test loads should be applied in such a manner that
the local effects and deflections produced by the actual loads in use are reproduced as closely as
possible. The applied test loads and the structure should be given, as far as possible, the same
degree of freedom as actually occur in the field in order to minimize spurious restraining loads
that would otherwise be induced as the structure deflects and rotates.

8.5.3 If it is impractical to reproduce all the applied loads, the required effect may be
produced by simulated loads or by increasing the value of other loads, providing this does not
affect the validity of the results.

39
 8.5.4 If a load on a different axis produced 5% or less of the total effect being examined
and is difficult or expensive to apply, it can be omitted provided stability is not affected and the
omission is stated and allowed for in the test report.

8.5.5 A structure or component under test must be supported so that accurate measurements
of strain deflection and permanent set can be made.

8.5.6 The effect of actual in-service bearing and support conditions must be covered in
other tests. Components also must be supported as they would be in the complete structure.

8.5.7 The structure or component must be tested at the most disadvantageous, in-service,
geometric conditions allowed in design.

8.5.8 In addition, it may be considered desirable to check that a structure can accept, with a
lower factor of safety, more extreme geometric or loading conditions than are allowed in design
if occasional specific misuse in service can be envisaged.

8.5.9 Working Load Test.

8.5.9.1 This may be a separate test or may be allowed to continue into the overload test.

8.5.9.2 The critical value of the design load, P, defined in Sections V, LOADS AND
LOAD COMBINATIONS and VI, SAFETY will be applied to the structure. The load should be
applied in sufficient number of increments and decrements to determine that the structure is
behaving in a linear elastic manner

8.5.9.3 Each increment of load will be held for 2 minutes, after which measurements of
deflection and strain will be recorded.

8.5.9.4 Net stresses are not to exceed the allowable working values given in this Code. If
repeated applications of the load are required, stresses shall be consistent among applications.

8.5.9.5 Once the structure has settled down, there shall be no permanent set on pinholes
or deflections because of further application of the design load, P.

8.5.9.6 The structure will be examined before proceeding to the overload test to confirm
to the designer that there is no unacceptable cracking, loosening, or pulling of mechanical
fasteners; structural deformation; or other signs of damage. The structure should remain within
dimensional tolerances.

8.5.10 Overload Test.

8.5.10.1 The test overload, O, will be the critical values of the design load, P, from
Sections V, LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS, and VI, SAFETY multiplied by the safety
factor 1.33. The overload, O, will be applied a minimum of 3 times.

40
 8.5.10.2 Before proceeding to the overload test, the structure should be loaded once to
working load, P, and unloaded before setting instrumentation to zero readings. This procedure is
intended to settle supports, joints, and the loading distributing system. It may be omitted if the
overload test has been immediately preceded by the working load test.

8.5.10.3 The first load application will be in increments. Each increment of load will
be held for a minimum of 2 minutes, after which measurements of deflection and strain will be
recorded. Each application of the test overload, O, will be held for 30 minutes.

8.5.10.4 The overload, O, will be removed, intermediate readings during off-loading

will be taken if required, and residual measurements of deflection and strain will be recorded. A
recovery period may be allowed if considered necessary, and the residual measurements will be
taken again. The load may be taken off at any stage if a check on the onset of permanent set is
required. Elastic buckling with no critical secondary effects is acceptable.

8.5.10.5 The structure will be examined to confirm to the designer that there is no
unacceptable cracking, loosening, or pulling of mechanical fasteners; structural deformation; or
other signs of damage.

8.5.10.6 The test overload, O, shall then be applied without increments an additional
two times, or until linearity and repeatability has been demonstrated.

8.5.10.7 The last application of the overload, O, should be made in increments, and the
overload, O, should be held for 30 minutes. Residual measurements of strain and deflection
shall be recorded after the structure is completely unloaded, and these shall be used to assess any
evidence of damage.

8.5.10.8 The structure or component will have passed the test, if it passes the
conditions of paragraph 8.5.10.5 and if there is no permanent set exceeding the allowable limits
given in paragraph 8.5.10.9.

8.5.10.9 The aim of the test is to demonstrate repeatability and to assure that there is
no permanent set due to the last application of the overload, O. To ensure a safe structure or
component, it is also necessary to limit the permanent set due to the first application of the test
overload, O. Theoretically, there may be up to approximately 0.2% permanent set on the first
load application and none after a few load applications. There will be some settling of
connections. Some permanent set can be allowed provided this does not cause subsequent
problems. See Allowable Permanent Set table.

8.5.10.10 If a component or structure does not satisfy the permanent set limits for the
first application of the test overload, it must then be shown that it can take at least the ultimate
load, U, after allowing for dimensions and material values.

41
 8.5.10.11 If a structure or component shows no or very little permanent set, the test
overload, O, may be increased to establish a higher rating and satisfy Section IX, AVOIDANCE
OF OVERWEIGHT DESIGN.

ALLOWABLE PERMANENT SET

Deflections On First Application of Due to the Last, Application of

Test Overload, O* Test Overload, O*
Item 1. Connections, Pinholes, pins where 0.4% 0.2%
local yielding, bearing and
settlement can occur.

Item 2. Deflections. 0.2% 0.1%

Item 3. Deflections which are a summation 0.4% 0.2%

of permanent sets.
Permanent buckling due to the last application of the test overload is not acceptable in a compression member that
has no alternative load paths.

Items 1 and 2 need not be checked if the requirements of Item 3 are met. However, other specification requirements
for particular equipment may necessitate the checking of Items 1 and 2.

These dimensional changes are the result of external load effects. Ensure that thermal effects are allowed for
separately.

* Percentages are expressed in relation to maximum deflection for deflections.

8.5.11 A component or structure can be modified or repaired at any stage during the
structural-strength testing, but it must pass the complete overload test in its final form.

8.5.12 Ultimate Load Test.

8.5.12.1 The ultimate load capacity for an equipment or structure or component should
be established but is not mandatory.

8.5.12.2 The load, U, will generally be established by increasing the load at the critical
position without the other applied loads and with level bank-seat supports. The designer must
establish the critical components and load position considering transverse and longitudinal
effects and combinations of bending and shear. The amount of vehicle eccentricity and inclined
support effect to be applied must be carefully considered.

8.5.12.3 The ultimate load, U, is the maximum load. The calculated ultimate load, UC,
will be the critical values of the design load, P, from Section V, LOADS AND LOAD
COMBINATIONS, and Section VI, SAFETY, and multiplied by the safety factor 1.5.

8.5.12.4 For an equipment or structure the limit of use may occur before the ultimate
load, U, is reached due to distortion. The load limit when an equipment or component is not
recoverable and/or cannot be reassembled is of interest, but may not be the ultimate load, U.

42
Failure of a structure has not been reached when individual components fail which do not cause
failure of the whole structure or stop it being used.

8.5.12.5 The load shall be applied in regular increments no greater than the increments
used in the overload test. Each increment of load should be held for 5 minutes after which
measurements of strain and deflection will be recorded. The load at which permanent set
becomes unacceptable must be established if not already covered by the overload test. The
structure must be carefully examined for any signs of incipient failure due, for example, to
buckling or weld tearing that may not be obvious from the readings being taken. The calculated
ultimate load, UC, should be held for 30 minutes. It is expected that this load will be exceeded.
If the ultimate load capacity is required to be established, then the calculated ultimate load, UC,
is strictly an acceptance condition in that it must not be less than the requirements of paragraph
6.3.1. Failure may not be in the expected mode so careful observation is required. This may be
aided by loading under displacement control.

8.5.12.6 The ultimate load capacity from the test is not representative for the whole
population because of the variability of the material tested, the geometrical variability,
dimensions of failed sections, residual fabrication stresses, and the limited sample.

8.6 Trafficking Tests.

8.6.1 To demonstrate that vehicles have no difficulty in crossing the bridge and that no
oscillations or deflections occur that could cause damage or limit crossing, the tests will be
conducted wherein a number of vehicles likely to use the bridge will cross in both directions at
varying speeds up to the maximum possible as defined in paragraph 4.2.10. These tests should
be used to establish the working-stress data caused by impact and eccentricity. Crossings also
will be made at the extreme longitudinal and transverse slopes allowed with mud and, if
possible, snow and ice on the deck. These tests shall be carried out on a representative bank seat
conditions at minimum and maximum spans.

8.6.2 Deck-wear tests will be carried out to show that the deck system will have an
acceptable life span. The vehicles should include the most aggressive tracks as well as the most
common crossing vehicles. Gravel and stones shall be placed on the deck in order to check for
puncturing.

8.7 Additional Floating Equipment Tests.

8.7.1 Requirement tests for floating bridges and rafts will include stability and flotation. A
raft must be tested to show that it is stable when steered in all directions - in the maximum
current if possible - and that control is not lost when it rotates. Clear-span parts, joints,
connections, and, as far as possible, the structure and components should be given an overload
test. After the test overload, O, slight buckling of the pontoon skin is acceptable providing it
remains watertight and usable. There are, however, two major problems in testing floating
equipment: (1) flotation may not be sufficient to carry the test overload, and (2) it may not be
possible to cover the range of hydrodynamic conditions.

43
 8.7.2 A load test will be carried out in still water to the limit where there is no freeboard. If
safety permits, the test may be carried further, but it should not exceed the overload test
condition.

8.7.3 At least one full system test will be carried out with hydrodynamic conditions as near
as possible to the most severe or critical.

8.7.4 A stability test is performed to determine the floating structure's righting moment for
roll angles up to the point where capsizing is imminent. Tests should be run for both loaded and
unloaded conditions in still and fast water. The laden weight and center of gravity (CG) must be
established by relating the loads and their positions to the unladen conditions determined first.
Heel angles should be increased by approximately 2.0 increments until the heeling force
(usually applied by pairs of cables that do not affect buoyancy), drops off sharply. This indicates
approaching instability/capsizing, and the test is stopped. For a structure with adequate stability,
the heeling may be limited at the discretion of the designer.

8.8 Fatigue Tests.

8.8.1 At least one complete bridge should be tested by trafficking with a range of vehicles
which are representative of those that will use the bridge and produce the fatigue design loading
conditions. Decking and cross-girders could require wheel or axle loadings which are not given
by a tracked vehicle. Trafficking is necessary because it is not normally possible to reproduce in
the laboratory all of the conditions caused by a rolling load and the interaction of bridge
components at all locations or vibration loading.

8.8.2 The trafficking test should be carried out over the range of vehicle speeds that will
occur in service for at least a total of n cycles or crossings and desirably up to 1.5n. Impact and
eccentricity will occur naturally. A field trial is the only comprehensive test covering all
possible fatigue critical areas and all loading arising from the crossing vehicle. A test in the
laboratory requires the engineer to identify the fatigue critical area(s).

8.8.3 If the test is continued in the laboratory, actual stresses measured at particular
locations as the bridge is crossed should be reproduced instead of the fatigue design load range,
PFAT. Laboratory testing must load the fatigue critical areas, and tests at several load positions
may be necessary to cover different details and/or bending and shear. Due to the symmetry of a
structure about its major axes and the repeated details along the length, there will be two or more
fatigue critical detail samples. It may be possible to increase the number of samples tested by
adjusting the position, contact area, and magnitude of the load so that the samples are all
correctly loaded, provided transverse loading due to differential deflection is not critical. All
details considered part of a sample must be justified by the measurement of strain or load
distribution or accurate detailed analysis.

8.8.4 Sample Testing.

8.8.4.1 It is normally not possible to test more than one or two complete structures and,
because there can be considerable differences in performance of nominally identical structures

44
when subjected to the same fatigue loading, there is still a risk that the worst structure will have
a life less than the design life.

8.8.4.2 The fatigue test load shall be applied to the structure for at least the design life,
1.5n, without repairs or replacements being necessary. The test must also be continued to
determine the eventual mode of failure and so that cracking and inspection techniques can be
confirmed or alternatives prescribed to ensure damage tolerance. The test life required for the
number of equally stressed samples being tested is obtained by factoring n using the following
table for military bridges allowing 95% confidence of 95% exceedance. The accepted value of
used is log 0.176*.

Number of Samples Tested 1 2 4 6 8 9 10 100

All samples failed, factors n log mean 3.80 3.12 2.72 2.56 2.47 2.43 2.41 2.08
assuming population standard deviation log
0.176.

First sample to fail with population standard 3.80 2.65 2.00 1.75 1.60 1.54 1.50 0.91
deviation assumed as log 0.176.

8.8.4.3 In fatigue test of bridges, usually a set of identical components stressed very
similarly are present. So, several samples are tested. When one sample fails, the second line of
the table applies.

8.8.4.4 If the bridge lasts for the factored number of cycles, it is considered to have met
the life requirement. When failure occurs at a life between 1.5n and the factored number of
cycles, the designer must show that the structure is a worse-than-average sample and that there is
not a design or production fault. An example would be if the bridge stresses at the location of
failure agree in detail with design stresses and if the specimen adequately represents in detail the
bridge in material, geometry, and fabrication technique.

8.8.4.5 Alternatively, a minimum life can be calculated from first principles using test
results of components or structures using a test factor derived by a method such as shown in
DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS-01, Chapter 9. This must take into account: the upper limit of
exceedance and the degree of confidence, and the number of samples and variations allowed
compared with the final production population (e.g., different batches of material from different
suppliers, different manufacturing equipment, different operators, different factories, and
changes with time).

8.8.5 During the trafficking and laboratory tests, regular inspections must be carried out
including those proposed for use in service. Cracks should be allowed to grow and be monitored
to investigate:

* Sample (for fatigue testing) - For large components and in order to increase the number of samples tested, it may
be possible to consider that there is more than one sample of the fatigue critical detail, providing the geometry and
loading are identical and the onset of cracking of one sample does not influence the loading of any other sample.
Symmetry of a structure and repetitive details along a structure can be considered, providing the loading is
symmetrical.

45
 Possible variations in crack growth rate

Frequency of in-service inspections

Cracks becoming detectable soon after an in-service inspection

The effect of non-detection of a crack at an in-service inspection

This information should be used to establish the final form and frequency of in-service
inspections and to assess remaining working life.

8.8.6 At all times during the test, the structure must be capable of withstanding the fatigue
design load range, PFAT, increased to an equivalent of the maximum working load, P, for the
fatigue critical section without collapse. This should be confirmed at regular intervals and at the
end of the test. If periodic application of a high load improves the fatigue life, allowances may
have to be made for this effect.

8.8.7 At no time before or during the fatigue tests should loads higher than the maximum
working load, P, be applied to a component or structure unless it forms part of the specified
acceptance or in-service proving procedure, in which case it should be included in the test. Any
overloading beneficial to fatigue life must be disclosed.

8.8.8 Cracks that are practical and economical to repair may be repaired before they
endanger the structure or other components by deformation or collapse, providing the repair can
be carried out during service. Similarly, components may be replaced if practical and
economical. Uneconomical repairs or replacements may be made during a test to prove other
parts of an equipment.

8.8.9 If there are changes between prototype and production that could reduce the fatigue
life or transfer failure elsewhere, early production equipment or components must be tested to
establish that the life requirement is still satisfied.

8.8.10 Equipment designed for safe life must be tested to show that the required life,
multiplied by the appropriate factors from the table given in paragraph 8.8.4.2, is satisfied. The
test may also be continued to 1.5n for monitored usage, 6.7n for unmonitored constant load
spectrum, and 10n for unmonitored usage multiplied by the appropriate factor from the table
given in paragraph 8.8.4.2 to show the design assumptions have been achieved. The inspection
requirement (paragraph 8.8.5) and in-service repairs (paragraph 8.8.8) are not applicable, but still
may be used in case the structure fails to meet these life requirements and is accepted as damage
tolerant.

8.9 Resonance. During testing it should be confirmed that the natural frequencies of a bridge,
part bridge, or component are such that they will not be made to resonate by construction or use.
Similarly, there should be no resonance due to wind or water vortex shedding.

46
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

47
 IX. AVOIDANCE OF OVERWEIGHT DESIGN

9.1 General. Minimum weight should be a design aim, but it must be balanced with producing
economic, robust equipment that will survive in-service use and misuse. On modular bridging
equipment the designer should try to anticipate extension of use during development and
increased loadings that could result on certain components.

9.2 Prototype Structure. An early prototype structure should show generally that the working
or allowable stresses are reached in the working-load test. Allowances may have to be made for
eventual deck wear and increased residual stresses and stress concentration of increasing
permanent set when the applied load is increased above the test overload, O, and before 1.1
times test overload, O, is reached. If permanent set occurs only above this, the structure should
be modified and retested, unless there are good structural or economic reasons for accepting the
overdesign. The applied test load should be related to actual material properties, allowing for the
minimum if there is variation in the different sections used in the structure:

f t (Material in Test)
PTEST = P
f t (Material Specification)

9.3 Fatigue Considerations. If fatigue governs design, the working stresses may be reduced,
and the structural strength tests will not be critical. Nonetheless, the designer must check
stresses in the structure at this stage. The fatigue test is difficult to use to show overdesign
because of scatter of test results and the expense of running further tests. Component or detail
laboratory testing should be used with the correct loading as far as possible. Longer life than the
requirement must be balanced with the economics of possible weight savings and further fatigue
testing.

9.4 Economic Considerations. Should tests show the structure to be overdesigned, changes
should be made only if it is economical to do so and if it is certain that the changes will not
jeopardize the durability, ease of assembly, and other characteristics established as satisfactory
on user or other trials.

9.5 Modification. It should be noted that it is generally easier to reinforce a structure or

component than it is to reduce weight.

48
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

49
 X. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

10.1 General. The following must be considered:

10.1.1 Design verification should include additional failure effects relating to laminate
behavior such as interlaminar shear and edge effects.

10.1.2 Temperature Effects. Normally a composite would not be selected which would be
significantly affected by temperature over the range of working temperatures. If this cannot be
achieved, tests must be carried out in the most disadvantageous conditions that could be
experienced. Weapon effects must be considered. Thermal stresses in hybrid structures with
different moduli of elasticity and/or coefficients of thermal expansion must be considered.
Temperature cycling effects are to be considered.

10.1.3 Surface damage due to roller, wheels, tracks, or stones.

10.1.4 General and local impact damage due to severe mishandling which can cause
interlaminar cracks not seen by the eye.

10.1.5 Environmental degradation particularly due to moisture absorption and ultraviolet

degradation.

10.1.6 The possible effects of galvanic corrosion and thermal cycling for hybrid structures
constructed of metals and composite materials.

10.1.7 Fatigue life, even if the basic material has an asymptotic stress on the stress/number
of cycles (S/N) curve, stress concentration, and joints must be investigated. Carbon composites
have a good fatigue life when loaded axially in tension; however, when the matrix contribution
to load resistance is significant, fatigue lives are only comparable with that of metals. Under
cyclic loading composites are less sensitive to notches than metals. In static loading they are
more sensitive to notches than metals. Fatigue failure should be defined in terms of loss of
stiffness as well as onset of cracking.

10.1.8 Toxicity and flammability during fabrication and in-service use.

10.2 Testing.

10.2.1 Structures and components should undergo sustained loading to ensure that the full
working load without impact can be maintained for at least 12 hours without unacceptable creep.

10.2.2 For the overload test (paragraph 8.5.10), the overload factor should be increased to
1.5 in order to ensure that there is an adequate reserve on the calculated ultimate load, UC, since
there is unlikely to be noticeable yielding or non-linearity.

50
 10.2.3 Where components include metal joints or parts, it must be decided whether some
deformation is acceptable between 1.33P and 1.5P. Yielding and some deformation is accepted
in areas not in contact with composite material.

51
 XI. RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, AND MAINTAINABILITY

11.1 General. This Code is largely concerned with structural design and its validation.
Reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) must also be considered to ensure that
equipment is capable of repeated transportation, erection, use, dismantling, and reuse under field
conditions, and that it can be easily repaired. Structural design and fatigue testing are performed
to high levels of exceedance and confidence. The same can be expected of component/system
mechanical reliability. When reliability is established by carrying out a number of complete
mission cycles/battlefield days, it may be necessary, especially for hand-erected equipment, to
accept lower levels of reliability and confidence. Reliability trials only can be carried out by
troops. There is no relaxation for the number of samples tested except that it can increase the
mean-time-between-failure. RAM must be included in trade-off analyses, especially those
concerning cost and weight, since it is more cost effective to design in RAM rather than to
perform design changes after the equipment is built (see DOD Directive 5000.40, MIL-STD-
785B and MIL-STD-721C).

11.2 Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). A failure modes, effects,
and criticality analysis must be performed for all equipment down to the lowest repairable level
early in the design effort. This analysis will be used to identify areas requiring design emphasis
to eliminate modes of failure, to incorporate changes to lessen the effects of certain failures, and
to provide a basic maintenance strategy for both corrective repair actions and scheduled
inspection, which may be required.

11.3 Parts Control and Component Testing. A parts control program will be established to
aide in the selection of proven or established parts. The program will encompass, as a minimum,
the hydraulic, electronic/electrical, and mechanical parts used to control and launch/recover the
bridge structure. The structural interface of components, linkages, and pins should be selected
with the aid of stress-strength analyses. If a fracture control plan, as mentioned in paragraphs
7.4.3 and 7.5.4, is established, it then should become part of RAM. For parts with an unknown
reliability data base or newly designed parts, component testing should be performed to verify
their acceptability for use in military bridging equipment.

11.4 Stress Derating. Criteria for the derating of both electronic and non-electronic parts
should be established at the start of a new design.

11.5 Design Guidelines and Reviews. RAM design guidelines must be established to assist
the designers in achieving the user's requirements. All RAM related efforts should be presented
at scheduled design reviews with separate RAM reviews held when deemed necessary.

11.6 Models and Predictions. Reliability and maintainability math models should be initiated
at the start of a program which represents the functional design as it matures. Predictions should
be periodically performed based on the models and FMECA to assess the equipment's capability
to meet the user's requirements. Corrective action will be instituted at the onset of noncompli-
ance with these requirements.

52
11.7 Software Development. Any software developed for use in automatically controlling
bridging equipment must be performed in accordance with an established software quality
assurance program. The software should be tested separately before integration with the system
hardware.

11.8 Maintenance Concept. The design effort must be cognizant of the user's maintenance
concept to develop equipment maintainable with the expected skill of user personnel, to facilitate
the ease of maintenance, and to limit the use of special tools or maintenance test equipment.

11.9 Desirable Measures of Reliability and Maintainability.

11.9.1 Reliability. The mission reliability should be specified as the mean number of
mission cycles before failure that aborts or prevents completion of the missions. The basic reli-
ability should be specified as the mean number of mission cycles before failure that requires a
corrective maintenance action.

11.9.2 Maintainability. The equipment maintainability should be specified as a

maintenance ratio of maintenance man-hours per mission. The man-hours for both corrective
and preventive maintenance should be included in the ratio. An alternative or additional
measure would specify a mean time to repair for corrective maintenance actions and a preventive
maintenance schedule.

11.9.3 Availability. The measure that should be used is operational availability. This term
not only includes operating time and maintenance actions, but accounts for standby time
(operable but not in use) and administrative and logistics delays incurred during the repair of the
equipment.

53
 XII. BRIDGE CROSSING RATING

12.1 General. This system can be used to increase the load class and/or span under restricted
crossing conditions.

12.2 Normal Crossing. A normal crossing is unrestricted use of an equipment within the
parameters of this code.

12.3 Caution Crossing.

12.3.1 A Caution Crossing allows, with the same safety as Normal Crossing, to cross with
heavier vehicles or with longer spans by adapting use conditions.

12.3.2 Regarding bridge crossings, the vehicles must be driven along the centerline of the
way. They are guided and their speed must not exceed 5 km/h (3.1 mph). Braking, accelerating
and changing gears are forbidden.

12.3.3 Regarding fixed bridges, vehicles are only allowed to cross one at a time on each
independent structural span.

12.3.4 Regarding floating bridges, several vehicles are allowed to cross only with a distance
between vehicles greater than the one established during the conception of the bridge. This value
(which must never be lower than 30.5 m (100 ft)) will not appear on the bridge but in the
technical documents put at the disposal of the engineer in charge of the bridge.

12.3.5 Regarding ferries and rafts, the vehicles must be loaded at low speed and guided.
They are set up in order to respect the safety and buoyancy of the system. The vehicles brakes
are set and the tires are blocked. Otherwise, it is necessary to avoid any maneuvers of the ferry or
raft that would cause swirls and brusque changes of direction.

12.3.6 For analytical classifications at this crossing level, the same loading and safety factor
requirements for normal crossings apply except that impact factor is not required.

12.3.7 Additionally, to reflect vehicles driving along the bridge centerline, outside girders
and trusses may be assumed to carry a minimum of 1/2 the live load. Load distribution will not
change for multi-girder bridges.

12.4 Risk Crossing. A Risk Crossing allows trafficking with heavier vehicles or with longer
spans or with higher current speeds than a Caution Crossing by adapting all the safety factors.

12.4.1 Regarding bridges, the vehicles cross one by one per span which is structurally
independent. They must be driven along the centerline of the way. They are guided and their
speed must not exceed 5 km/h (3.1 mph). Braking, accelerating and changing gears are
forbidden.

54
 12.4.2 Regarding ferries and rafts, the vehicles must be loaded at low speed and guided.
They are set up in order to respect the safety and buoyancy of the system. The vehicles brakes
are set and the tires are blocked. Otherwise, it is necessary to avoid any maneuvers of the ferry
or raft that would cause swirls and brusque changes of direction.

12.4.3 For analytical classifications at this crossing level, use all of the same assumptions as
for Caution Crossing, except the safety factors are lowered to minimum acceptable values.

12.4.4 Note that low safety factors often mean that the probability of bridge failure is greatly
increased and even if failure does not occur, permanent damage to the structure may occur.
Structural stresses may be equal to or slightly exceed yield limits, but not exceed ultimate limits.
For floating equipments, the probability of sinkage or capsizing is also greatly increased.

12.5 Testing. Tests should be carried out with the actual Military Load Class (MLC) vehicle
footprint and/or increased spans. Permitted support conditions and secondary loading must be
rigorously applied.

55
 APPENDIX A

METAL DATA SHEETS

A.1 Data sheets of common military bridging materials are provided for information purposes
only and are not intended for design. Other materials may also be considered.

A.2 Nomenclature:

A.2.1 Relative Fabrication and Corrosion Codes: The following comparison codes are
used:

a - Excellent
b - Good
c - Fair
d - Poor
X - Not applicable
a-b - Denotes declining rating with higher tempers
b-a - Denotes improving rating with higher tempers

Note: A plus sign following the rating means better than.

A minus sign following the rating means not as good as.

The above comparison code definitions are given in Aluminum standards and data, Table
3.3, Comparative Characteristics and Applications. Aluminum standards and data is published
biennially by The Aluminum Association Inc., 818 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington D.C.
20006.

A.2.2 Symbols:

E- Elongation in percent

L- Longitudinal, rolling, or extrusion direction

T- Long transverse direction

bru - Ultimate bearing stress

bry - Yield bearing stress

cy - Yield compressive stress

su - Ultimate shear stress

sy - Yield shear stress

A-1
 Rm - Ultimate tensile stress

Rp0.2 - Yield tensile stress

uw - Ultimate weld strength

yw - Yield weld strength

A.3 Index of Metals.

METAL DATA CHART

Country Yield Ultimate

National of Stress Stress Elongation
Material Designation Origin (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (%) Weldability
Aluminum 2219 US 250-360 370-440 3-6 Yes
DGFVE 232B UK 349-368 408-424 11.3-13.2 Yes
MVEE 1318B UK 315-425 385-465 6-8 Yes
7005 US 260-310 325-350 7-10 Yes
AlZn4.5Mg1F35 FRG 140-290 220-350 7-12 Yes
AlZn4.5Mg2F41 FRG 335-350 375-410 8 Yes
x7046 US 117-375 180-420 13-18 Yes
7075 US 145-490 275-558 4-10 No
7020 UK 270 320 8 Yes
7050 US 365-483 427-545 3-10 Yes

Steel S355J2G3 FRG 315-355 480-630 20-22 Yes

T-1 A514 US 630-700 730-800 17-18 Yes
18% Maraging US/UK 1,400 1,460 4-15 Yes
4340 US 482-1,480 760-1,800 10-22 No

A-2
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Missiles and space vehicles, pressure tanks, high-temperature applications. 2219
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. T31, T37, T62, T81, (See paragraph A.2) Element %
T87 Cold Working - O .......... b Si .................................. 0.20 max
Plate ............... T35, T34, T62, T85, Cold Working - T ... ....... X Fe .................................. 0.30 max
T87 Arc Welding .................. a Cu ................................. 5.8-6.8
Shapes (Ext.)... T35, T62, T8511 Resistance Welding ....... a Mn ................................ 0.20-0.40
Tube .............. T31, T81 Brazing ......................... X Mg ................................ 0.02 max
Bar ................. T351, T851 Machining ..................... a Zn ................................. 0.10 max
Forgings ......... T35, T6, T851, T87 V ................................... 0.05-0.15
Ti .................................. 0.02-0.10
Zr .................................. 0.10-0.25
Others, ea ...................... 0.05 max
Others, Total ................. 0.15 max
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties:* Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.83 General ......................... d
Thermal Exp .. 22.3 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ a
Mod of Elas .... 72 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27.7 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 30 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
ASTM B 221-90 Rivet alloys ................... 2219
QQ-A-250/30 Welding wire ................. 2219
AWS A5.10 Weld strength (typ.) ....... Heat treated after weld
uw ................................ 435 N/mm2
yw ................................ 335 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 10%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet & Plate T62 0.50-50 370 250 6 38 310 820 615
T81 0.50-6.0 430 320 6 470 350 930 755
T851 6.0-50 410 300 5 430 350 930 755
T87 0.50- 00 440 360 6 500 370 970 815

Extrusion T8511 0.50-75 400 290 6 410

Forging T6 100 400 280 4

T852 100 430 340 3

* Properties of Alloy 2219 have been changed to comply with most recent specifications.

A-3
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Military Bridges DGFVE 232B
Country:
UK
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Available (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available Cold Working - O ...... a Si .................................. 0.2 max
Shapes (Ext.)... Available Cold Working - T ....... c Fe .................................. 0.3 max
Tube ............... Available Arc Welding ............... a Cu ................................. 0.12-0.16
Bar ................. Available Resistance Welding .... a Mn ................................ 0.15-0.35
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ....................... b Mg ................................ 1.8-2.2
Machining .................. b Cr .................................. 0.05 max
Zn ................................. 3.7-4.2
Ti .................................. 0.1 max
Zr .................................. 0.1-0.25
Others, ea ...................... 0.15 max
Others, Total ................. 0.15 max
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.8 General ......................... b
Thermal Exp .. 23.8 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ b
Mod of Elas .... 71 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27.7 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 40 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
Specification DGFVE 232.4 Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................. NG61
Weld strength (typ.) ....... Naturally aged failure in Heat Affected Zone (HAZ).
uw ................................ 310 N/mm2
yw ................................ 215 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 5%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Extrusion TF 424 368 13.2 820 616 124

Plate 408 352 11.3 122

Thick Plate 414 349 11.5

(82-118 mm)

Forging 410 355 12.2 126

A-4
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Armor Plate MVEE 1318B
Country:
UK
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Not Available (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available >6.3 mm Cold Working - O .......... -- Si .................................. 0.3 max
Shapes (Ext.)... Available (MVEE 517) Cold Working - T .......... -- Fe .................................. 0.4 max
Tube ............... -- Arc Welding .................. b Cu ................................. 0.25 max
Bar ................. -- Resistance Welding ....... b Mn ................................ 0.1-0.7
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ......................... -- Mg ................................ 1.7-3.3
Machining ..................... b Cr .................................. 0.25 max
Zn ................................. 4.0-6.0
Zr .................................. 0.25 max
Others, ea ...................... --
Others, Total ................. --
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.8 General ......................... b
Thermal Exp .. 23.8 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ b-
Mod of Elas .... 71 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 30 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
Proprietary alloy Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................. NG61
Weld strength (typ.) ....... Welds naturally aged
uw ................................ 350 N/mm2
yw ................................ 290 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 5%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Plate 6-<51 430 360 8

51-<76 410 340 8
>76 410 340 6

Extrusion TF 6 430 410 8

6-100 465 425 8

Forging TF 385 315 7

A-5
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Welded structures, military bridges 7005
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. T63, T6351 (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... T63, T6351 Cold Working - O .......... a Si .................................. 0.35 max
Shapes (Ext.)... T53 Cold Working - T .......... c Fe .................................. 0.40 max
Tube ............... -- Arc Welding .................. a Cu ................................. 0.10 max
Bar ................. -- Resistance Welding ....... a Mn ................................ 0.20-0.70
Forgings ......... T53 Brazing ......................... -- Mg ................................ 1.0-1.8
Machining ..................... b Cr .................................. 0.06-0.20
Zn ................................. 4.0-5.0
Zr .................................. 0.08-0.20
Ti .................................. 0.01-0.06
Others, ea ...................... 0.05 max
Others, Total ................. 0.15 max
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.80 General ......................... b
Thermal Exp .. 23.8 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ b
Mod of Elas .... 71 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 55 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
ASTM B 221-90 Rivet alloys ................... 1100, 6053-T61
Welding wire ................. 5356, 5039
Weld strength (typ.) ....... Naturally aged
uw ................................ 300 N/mm2
yw ................................ 200 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 9%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Extrusion T53 All 350 310 10 310 190 495 405

Sheet & Plate T63 6-75 325 260 7 325 180 480 365

A-6
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Military bridges, amphibious vehicles (M2 Beaver) AlZn4.5Mg1F35, 3. 4335, EN AW-7020
Country:
FRG
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Available (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available Cold Working - O .......... a Si .................................. 0.35 max
Shapes (Ext.)... Available Cold Working - T .......... c Fe .................................. 0.40 max
Tube ............... Available Arc Welding .................. b Cu .. 0.20 max
Bar ................. Available Resistance Welding ....... b Mn ................................ 0.05-0.50
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ......................... x Mg ................................ 1.0-1.4
Wire Available Machining ..................... b Cr .................................. 0.10-0.35
Zn ................................. 4.0-5.0
Zr .................................. 0.08-0.20
Others, ea ...................... 0.05 max
Others, Total ................. 0.15 max
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,770 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.77 General ......................... b
Thermal Exp .. 24.1 x 103 N/mm2 Stress Corrosion ............ b
Mod of Elas .... 70.5 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27.5 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 30 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:*
DIN 1725 Part 1 Rivet alloys ................... 3.3556
DIN EN-485 Welding wire ................. 3.3548
VG 95105 Weld strength (typ.) ...... Heat treated after weld
uw ................................ 275 N/mm2
yw ................................ 216 N/mm2
Elong ............................ --

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.
Sheet & 0 0.4-12.5 220 140 13 110 45
Plate T4, T451 0.4-12.5 320 210 12 220 92
T6, T651 0.4-12.5 350 280 10 280 104
T62
T651 12.5- 340 260 7 280 98
175.0
Shapes (Extr) 0.71 3.0-30.0 350 290 10 280 105
Tube 0.71 20 350 290 10 220 105
Bar 0.71 50 350 280 10 280 100
50-100 290 10 220 105
100-250 270 7 290 100
Forging 0.61 100 350 280 10 280 95
Wire 0.61 8 350 290 8 280 100
* Special firms are necessary to perform welding work.

A-7
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Future military bridges, amphibious vehicles* AlZn4.5Mg2F41, WL 3.4336
Country:
FRG
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. 3.4336 Part 1 (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... -- Cold Working - O .......... a Si .................................. 0.35 max
Shapes (Ext.)... 3.4336 Part 2 Cold Working - T .......... c Fe .................................. 0.40 max
Tube ............... -- Arc Welding .................. b Cu . 0.20 max
Bar ................. -- Resistance Welding ....... b Mn ................................ 0.05-0.50
Forgings ......... -- Brazing ......................... -- Mg ................................ 1.2-1.4
Machining ..................... b Cr .................................. 0.35 max
Zn ................................. 4.5-5.0
Ti .. 0.20 max
Zr .................................. 0.08-0.20
Others, ea ...................... 0.05
Others, Total ................. 0.15
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,770 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.77 General ......................... b
Thermal Exp .. 24.1 x 103 N/mm2 Stress Corrosion ............ b
Mod of Elas .... 70.5 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27.5 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 30 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
WL 3.4336 Rivet alloys ................... --
VG 95105 Welding wire ................. 3.3548
Weld strength (typ.) ...... Heat treated after weld
uw ................................ 275 N/mm2
yw ................................ 216 N/mm2
Elong ............................ --

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet .71 1.0-3.0 375 335 8 120

3.0-5.0 395 350 8 120
5.0-30.0 410 350 8 120

Shapes (Extr) .71 3.0-50.0 410 350 8 120

* The material will be available in the development phase of the Bridges of the Eighties program. Current research is directed
towards: (a) High-strength welding wire, (b) Improvement of corrosion resistance, and (c) Improvement of fatigue properties.

A-8
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
New proposed welded structure x7046
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. 0, T63 (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... 0, T63 Cold Working - O .......... a Si .................................. 0.40 max
Shapes (Ext.)... -- Cold Working - T .......... c Fe .................................. 0.35 max
Tube ............... -- Arc Welding .................. a Cu ................................. 0.10 max
Bar ................. -- Resistance Welding ....... -- Mn ................................ 0.30 max
Forgings ......... -- Brazing ......................... b Mg ................................ 1.3 max
Machining ..................... -- Cr .................................. 0.12 max
Zn ................................. 7.0 max
Ti .................................. 0.03 max
Zr .................................. 0.12 max
Others, ea ...................... --
Others, Total ................. --
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.8 General ......................... a
Thermal Exp .. 23.8 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ --
Mod of Elas .... 71 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. --
National Specifications: Joinings:
-- Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................. 5183
Weld strength (typ.) ....... --
uw ................................ --
yw ................................ --
Elong ............................ --

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)*

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet & Plate 0 180 117 18 117

T63 420 375 13 375

* Typical properties.

A-9
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Aircraft and high-strength nonweldable applications 7075
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. 0, T6, T73 (See paragraph A.2)
Plate ............... 0, T6, T73 Cold Working - O .......... a Element %
Shapes (Ext.)... 0, T6, T73 Cold Working - T .......... d Si .................................. 0.40 max
Tube ............... 0, T6, T73 Arc Welding .................. c, d Fe .................................. 0.50 max
Bar ................. 0, T6, T651 Resistance Welding ....... b Cu ................................. 1.2-2.0
Forgings ......... 0, T6, T73 Brazing ......................... X Mn ................................ 0.30 max
Machining ..................... b Mg ................................ 2.1-2.9
Cr .................................. 0.18-0.28
Zn ................................. 5.1-6.1
Ti .................................. 0.20 max
Others, ea ...................... 0.05 max
Others, Total ................. 0.15 max
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.8 General ......................... c
Thermal Exp .. 23.8 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ c, b
Mod of Elas .... 71 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 27 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 32 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
ASTM B209 Rivet alloys ................... 6061, 2117, 2017,2024
ASTM B221 Welding wire ................. --
ASTM B241 Weld strength (typ.) ....... (Not recommended)
uw ................................ --
yw ................................ --
Elong ............................ --

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet & Plate 0 40-50 275 145 10 145 185 68 600 285 60
T6 1-50 530 460 6 530 150
T73 1-6 460 385 8 385

Extrusion 0 All 275 165 10 165

T6 0.50-50 558 490 7 490
T73 1.5-50 470 400 7 400

Forging T6 50 500 420 9(L)/4(T) 420

T73 50 440 370 7(L)/4(T) 370

A-10
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Unspecified 7020
Country:
UK
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Available (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available Cold Working - O .......... a Si .................................. 0.35 max
Shapes (Ext.)... Available Cold Working - T .......... c Fe .................................. 0.40 max
Tube ............... Available Arc Welding .................. a Cu ................................. 0.2 max
Bar ................. Available Resistance Welding ....... a Mn ................................ 0.05-0.5
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ......................... b Mg ................................ 1.0-1.4
Machining ..................... b Cr .................................. 0.1-0.35
Zn ................................. 4.0-5.0
Zr .................................. 0.08-0.2
Ti .................................. 0.1 max
Zr + Ti .......................... 0.08-0.25
Others, ea ...................... --
Others, Total ................. --
Al .................................. Remainder
Properties: Corrosion Resistance:
Density ........... 2,800 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 2.8 General ......................... b
Thermal Exp .. Expected to be Stress Corrosion ............ b
Mod of Elas .... within 5% of
Mod of Rid ..... values obtained
KIC................... for Al 7005
National Specifications: Joinings:
-- Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................ NG61
Weld strength (typ.) ...... Naturally aged
uw ................................ 300 N/mm2
yw ................................ 200 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 5%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)*

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet, Plate TF 320 270 8

& Extrusion

* Above are minimum tensile properties expected from any thickness of any wrought form. Typical values of 12-25 mm (0.5-
1.0 in) thick plates or extrusions are likely to be some 50 MPa (7,250 lbf/in2) above these values.

A-11
 Aluminum
Application: Designation:
Military bridges, upgrades 7050
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Clad (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... T7651, T7451, T73651 Cold Working - O ...... b Si .................................. 0.12 max
Shapes (Ext.)... T76511, T73511 Cold Working - T ....... b Fe .................................. 0.15 max
Tube ............... Not Available Arc Welding ............... d Cu ................................. 2.0-2.6
Bar ................. Not Available Resistance Welding .... b Mn ................................ 0.10 max
Forgings ......... T7452, T74, T73652 Brazing ....................... d Mg ................................ 1.9-2.6
Machining .................. b Cr .................................. 0.04 max
Zn ................................. 5.7-6.7
Zr .................................. 0.08-0.15
Ti .................................. 0.06 max
Others, ea ...................... 0.05 max
Others, Total ................. 0.15 max
Al .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 2,830 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... -- General ......................... c
Thermal Exp .. 23.0 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ b
Mod of Elas .... 70.3 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 26.9 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 45.1 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
AMS 4050A, 4201, 4340, Rivet alloys ................... 7050-T73
4342, 4341, 4107, 4108 Welding wire ................. 5356, 4043
Weld strength (typ.) ....... 50% of parent metal
uw ................................ --
yw ................................ --
Elong ............................ 1%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

Plate T7651 6-76 524-545 455-483 7-9 441-503 290-324 765-1041 600-758
T7451 6-152 483-524 414-462 4-10 393-483 290-310 724-1027 593-745

Extrusion T76510 12-127 469-545 407-476 7 455-490 283-303 738-1041 558-765

T73510 19-127 427-483 365-414 8 393-421 255-269 634-910 510-655

Forging All 50-150 455-496 372-427 3-9 393-441 276-290 662-903 538-696

A-12
 Steel
Application: Designation:
Bridge structures, general structures S355J2G3
Country:
FRG
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Available (See paragraph A.2)
Plate .............. Available Cold Working - O .......... a Element %
Shapes (Ext.)... Available Cold Working - T .......... a C ................................... 0.22 max
Tube ............... Available Arc Welding .................. a P ................................... 0.035 max
Bar ................. Available Resistance Welding ....... a S ................................... 0.035 max
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ......................... a N ................................... --
Machining ..................... a Others, ea ...................... --
Others, Total ................. --
Fe .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 7,850 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... -- General ......................... d
Thermal Exp .. 12.0 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ a
Mod of Elas .... 204 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 79.5 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. --
National Specifications: Joinings:
DIN EN 10025 Rivet alloys ................... S275J2G4
Welding wire ................. S355
Weld strength (typ.) ....... No heat treatment
uw ................................ 490-630 N/mm2
yw ................................ --
Elong ............................ --

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)*

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

All N 3-16 490 355 22

16-40 - 345 22
40-63 - 335 21
63-80 630 325 20
80-100 630 315 20

* The ratio of strength to density is hardly satisfactory for military bridges. Maraging steels have
better values for static strength, but there are difficulties regarding fatigue behavior and ductility.

A-13
 Steel
Application: Designation:
High-strength, welded construction equipment and machinery T-1 Steel
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. -- (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available Cold Working - O .......... a C ................................... 0.10-0.20
Shapes (Ext.)... -- Cold Working - T .......... a Ni .................................. 0.60-1.0
Tube ............... Available Arc Welding .................. a Mo ................................ 0.40-0.60
Bar ................. Available Resistance Welding ....... a Mn ................................ 0.60-1.0
Forgings ......... -- Brazing ......................... a Cr .................................. 0.40-0.65
Machining ..................... a Si .................................. 0.20-0.35
V ................................... 0.03-0.08
Cu ................................. 0.015-0.50
Others, ea ...................... 0.04 max
Others, Total ................. 1.0 max
Fe .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 8,000 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 8.0 General ......................... d
Thermal Exp .. 13.9 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ a
Mod of Elas .... 210 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... --
KIC.................. --
National Specifications: Joinings:
ASTM-A-514 Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................. Low-hydrogen rod (E120)
Weld strength (typ.) ....... Typical
uw ................................ 730 N/mm2
yw ................................ 630 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 11%

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%)* cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet & Plate 5-64 800 700 18 700 600 400 321
64-150 730 630 17 630 550 360

* Elongations are given for 50.8 mm (2.0 in) gauge length.

A-14
 Steel
Application: Designation:
Aircraft components, mechanism parts 18% Maraging
Country:
US & UK
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. Available (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available Cold Working - O .......... a C ................................... 0.02 max
Shapes (Ext.)... -- Cold Working - T .......... X Ni .................................. 18.5 max
Tube ............... -- Arc Welding .................. a Co ................................. 8.5 max
Bar ................. -- Resistance Welding ....... a Mo ................................ 4.8 max
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ......................... -- Mn ................................ 0.3 max
Machining ..................... d Ti .................................. 0.25 max
Si .................................. 0.01 max
Al ................................. 0.20 max
Others, ea ...................... 0.04 max
Others, Total ................. 1.0 max
Fe .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 8,000 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... -- General ......................... d
Thermal Exp .. 10.0 x 10-6/K Stress Corrosion ............ d
Mod of Elas .... 189 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 72.9 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. 110 MN/m3/2
National Specifications: Joinings:
-- Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................. Same as base metal
Weld strength (typ.) ....... Equal to parent metal after aging 3 hr @ 48 C (118 F)
uw ................................ 1,410 N/mm2
yw ................................ 1,350 N/mm2
Elong ............................ 10% or 50 mm

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) R m* Rp0.2 E (%)
cy su sy bru bry No.

Sheet & Plate 1.5-6 1,460 1,390 4 1,390 43

6-11 1,460 1,390 15 1,390 43

* Maraging steel is available in higher strengths (up to 2,500 N/mm2, 362x103 lbf/in2) in special orders.
Elongations are given for a gauge length of 4.5 A where A is the cross-sectional area in square inches.

A-15
 Steel
Application: Designation:
Pins, hinges, hydraulic pressure vessels, mechanism linkages 4340
Country:
US
Availability: Relative Fabrication Rating: Chemical Composition:
Sheet .............. -- (See paragraph A.2) Element %
Plate ............... Available Cold Working - O .......... a C ................................... 0.38-0.43
Shapes (Ext.)... -- Cold Working - T .......... -- Cr .................................. 0.70-0.90
Tube ............... Available Arc Welding .................. * Ni .................................. 1.65-2.00
Bar ................. Available Resistance Welding ....... * P ................................... 0.04 max
Forgings ......... Available Brazing ......................... -- Mo ................................ 0.20-0.30
Machining ..................... a Mn ................................ 0.60-0.85
S ................................... 0.15-0.35
Si .................................. 0.20-0.35
Others, ea ...................... --
Others, Total ................. --
Fe .................................. Remainder

Properties: Corrosion Resistance:

Density ........... 8,000 kg/m3 (See paragraph A.2)
Spec Gravity ... 8.0 General ......................... d
Thermal Exp .. -- Stress Corrosion ............ a
Mod of Elas .... 200 x 103 N/mm2
Mod of Rid ..... 76 x 103 N/mm2
KIC.................. --
National Specifications: Joinings:
ASTM A320/A, 320M-88 Rivet alloys ................... --
Welding wire ................. 4340
Weld strength (typ.) ....... Same as parent material after heat treatment.
uw ................................ --
yw ................................ --
Elong ............................ --

Minimum Mechanical Properties (N/mm2)

Form Temper Thickness Tension (L) Comp (L) Shear Bearing Brinnell
(mm) Rm Rp0.2 E (%) cy su sy bru bry No.

All 5-15 1,800 1,480 10 1,650 1,070 510

760 482 22 482 290

* 4340 can be welded only with special care.

A-16
 APPENDIX B

CONVERSION FACTORS

B-1 LENGTH

TO in ft mi mm cm m km

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
in 1.000e+00 8.333e-02 1.578e-05 2.540e+01 2.540e+00 2.540e-02 2.540e-05

ft 1.200e+01 1.000e+00 1.894e-04 3.048e+02 3.048e+01 3.048e-01 3.048e-04

mi 6.336e+04 5.280e+03 1.000e+00 1.609e+06 1.609e+05 1.609e+03 1.609e+00

mm 3.937e-02 3.281e-03 6.214e-07 1.000e+00 1.000e-01 1.000e-03 1.000e-06

cm 3.937e-01 3.281e-02 6.214e-06 1.000e+01 1.000e+00 1.000e-02 1.000e-05

m 3.937e+01 3.281e+00 6.214e-04 1.000e+03 1.000e+02 1.000e+00 1.000e-03

km 3.937e+04 3.281e+03 6.214e-01 1.000e+06 1.000e+05 1.000e+03 1.000e+00

B-2 AREA

TO in2 ft2 mm2 cm2 m2

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
2
in 1.000e+00 6.944e-03 6.452e+02 6.452e+00 6.452e-04

ft2 1.440e+02 1.000e+00 9.290e+04 9.290e+02 9.290e-02

2
mm 1.550e-03 1.076e-05 1.000e+00 1.000e-02 1.000e-06

cm2 1.550e-01 1.076e-03 1.000e+02 1.000e+00 1.000e-04

2
m 1.550e+03 1.076e+01 1.000e+06 1.000e+04 1.000e+00

B-3 VOLUME

TO in3 ft3 mm3 cm3 m3

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
3
in 1.000e+00 5.787e-04 1.639e+04 1.639e+01 1.639e-05

ft3 1.728e+03 1.000e+00 2.832e+07 2.832e+04 2.832e-02

3
mm 6.102e-05 3.532e-08 1.000e+00 1.000e-03 1.000e-09

cm3 6.102e-02 3.532e-05 1.000e+03 1.000e+00 1.000e-06

3
m 6.102e+04 3.532e+01 1.000e+09 1.000e+06 1.000e+00

B-1
 B-4 MASS

TO Lb Ton(S) Ton(L) kg t

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
lb 1.000e+00 5.000e-04 4.465e-04 4.536e-01 4.536e-04

Ton(S) 2.000e+03 1.000e+00 8.930e-01 9.070e+02 9.070e-01

Ton(L) 2.240e+03 1.120e+00 1.000e+00 1.016e+03 1.016e+00

kg 2.205e+00 1.102e-03 9.843e-04 1.000e+00 1.000e-03

t 2.205e+03 1.102e+00 9.843e-01 1.000e+03 1.000e+00

B-5 FORCE (WEIGHT)

TO lbf kip ton-force(S) ton-force(L) kp (kgf) Mp* N kN MN

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
lbf 1.000e+00 1.000e-03 5.000e-04 4.465e-04 4.536e-01 4.536e-04 4.448e+00 4.448e-03 4.448e-06

kip 1.000e+03 1.000e+00 5.000e-01 4.465e-01 4.536e+02 4.536e-01 4.448e+03 4.448e+00 4.448e-03

ton-force(S) 2.000e+03 2.000e+00 1.000e+00 8.930e-01 9.070e+02 9.070e-01 8.896e+03 8.896e+00 8.896e-03

ton-force(L) 2.240e+03 2.240e+00 1.120e+00 1.000e+00 1.016e+03 1.016e+00 9.962e+03 9.962e+00 9.962e-03

kp (kgf) 2.205e+00 2.205e-03 1.102e-03 9.843e-04 1.000e+00 1.000e-03 9.807e+00 9.807e-03 9.807e-06
*
Mp 2.205e+03 2.205e+00 1.102e+00 9.843e-01 1.000e+03 1.000e+00 9.807e+03 9.807e+00 9.807e-03

N 2.248e-01 2.248e-04 1.124e-04 1.004e-04 1.020e-01 1.020e-04 1.000e+00 1.000e-03 1.000e-06

kN 2.248e+02 2.248e-01 1.124e-01 1.004e-01 1.020e+02 1.020e-01 1.000e+03 1.000e+00 1.000e-03

MN 2.248e+05 2.248e+02 1.124e+02 1.004e+02 1.020e+05 1.020e+02 1.000e+06 1.000e+03 1.000e+00

*For the purposes of this Trilateral Code, Mp refers to a metric ton-force or a megapond.

B-6 VELOCITY

TO ft/s ft/min mi/h knot m/s km/h

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
ft/s 1.000e+00 6.000e+01 6.818e-01 5.925e-01 3.048e-01 1.097e+00

ft/min 1.667e-02 1.000e+00 1.136e-02 9.875e-03 5.080e-03 1.829e-02

mi/h 1.467e+00 8.800e+01 1.000e+00 8.690e-01 4.471e-01 1.609e+00

knot 1.688e+00 1.013e+02 1.151e+00 1.000e+00 5.144e-01 1.852e+00

m/s 3.281e+00 1.969e+02 2.237e+00 1.944e+00 1.000e+00 3.600e+00

km/h 9.113e-01 5.468e+01 6.214e-01 5.400e-01 2.778e-01 1.000e+00

B-2
 FORCE (WEIGHT)
B7
LENGTH

TO lbf/ft kp/m (kgf/m) kN/m

TOCONVERT MULTIPLY BY
lbf/ft 1.000e+00 1.488e+00 1.459e-02

kp/m (kgf/m) 6.720e-01 1.000e+00 9.807e-03

kN/m 6.852e+01 1.020e+02 1.000e+00

B-8 DENSITY

TO lb/in3 lb/ft3 kg/cm3 kg/m3

TOCONVERT MULTIPLY BY
3
lb/in 1.000e+00 1.728e+03 2.768e-02 2.768e+04
3
lb/ft 5.786e-04 1.000e+00 1.602e-05 1.602e+01

kg/cm3 3.613e+01 6.243e+04 1.000e+00 1.000e+06

3
kg/m 3.613e-05 6.243e-02 1.000e-06 1.000e+00

B-9 SLOPE

Slope Angle (Degrees) Percent (%)

1 in 1 45.00 100.00
1 in 2 26.57 50.00
1 in 3 18.43 33.33
1 in 4 14.04 25.00
1 in 5 11.31 20.00
1 in 6 9.46 16.67
1 in 7 8.13 14.29
1 in 8 7.13 12.50
1 in 9 6.34 11.11
1 in 10 5.71 10.00
1 in 11 5.19 9.09
1 in 12 4.76 8.33
1 in 13 4.40 7.69
1 in 14 4.09 7.14
1 in 15 3.81 6.67
1 in 16 3.58 6.25
1 in 17 3.37 5.88
1 in 18 3.18 5.56
1 in 19 3.01 5.26
1 in 20 2.86 5.00

B-3
 B-10.1 PRESSURE OR STRESS

TO lbf/in2 (psi) lbf/ft2 kip/in2 (ksi) kip/ft2 ton-force(S)/in2 ton-force(S)/ft2 ton-force(L)/in2 ton-force(L)/ft2 kp/cm2 (kgf/cm2)

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
2
lbf/in (psi) 1.000e+00 1.440e+02 1.000e-03 1.440e-01 5.000e-04 7.201e-02 4.465e-04 6.430e-02 7.031e-02
2
lbf/ft 6.944e-03 1.000e+00 6.944e-06 1.000e-03 3.472e-06 5.000e-04 3.100e-06 4.465e-04 4.882e-04

kip/in2 (ksi) 1.000e+03 1.440e+05 1.000e+00 1.440e+02 5.000e-01 7.201e+01 4.465e-01 6.430e+01 7.031e+01
2
kip/ft 6.944e+00 1.000e+03 6.944e-03 1.000e+00 3.472e-03 5.000e-01 3.100e-03 4.465e-01 4.882e-01

ton-force(S)/in2 2.000e+03 2.880e+05 2.000e+00 2.880e+02 1.000e+00 1.440e+02 8.930e-01 1.286e+02 1.406e+02
2
ton-force(S)/ft 1.389e+01 2.000e+03 1.389e-02 2.000e+00 6.944e-03 1.000e+00 6.201e-03 8.930e-01 9.764e-01

ton-force(L)/in2 2.240e+03 3.225e+05 2.240e+00 3.225e+02 1.120e+00 1.613e+02 1.000e+00 1.440e+02 1.575e+02
2
ton-force(L)/ft 1.555e+01 2.240e+03 1.555e-02 2.240e+00 7.776e-03 1.120e+00 6.944e-03 1.000e+00 1.093e+00

kp/cm2 (kgf/cm2) 1.422e+01 2.048e+03 1.422e-02 2.048e+00 7.112e-03 1.024e+00 6.351e-03 9.146e-01 1.000e+00
B-4

2 2
kp/m (kgf/m ) 1.422e-03 2.048e-01 1.422e-06 2.048e-04 7.112e-07 1.024e-04 6.351e-07 9.146e-05 1.000e-04
2*
Mp/cm 1.422e+04 2.048e+06 1.422e+01 2.048e+03 7.112e+00 1.024e+03 6.351e+00 9.146e+02 1.000e+03

Mp/m2* 1.422e+00 2.048e+02 1.422e-03 2.048e-01 7.112e-04 1.024e-01 6.351e-04 9.146e-02 1.000e-01
2
N/mm (MPa) 1.450e+02 2.089e+04 1.450e-01 2.089e+01 7.252e-02 1.044e+01 6.476e-02 9.327e+00 1.020e+01

N/m2 (Pa) 1.450e-04 2.089e-02 1.450e-07 2.089e-05 7.252e-08 1.044e-05 6.476e-08 9.327e-06 1.020e-05
2
kN/mm 1.450e+05 2.089e+07 1.450e+02 2.089e+04 7.252e+01 1.044e+04 6.476e+01 9.327e+03 1.020e+04

kN/m2 1.450e-01 2.089e+01 1.450e-04 2.089e-02 7.252e-05 1.044e-02 6.476e-05 9.327e-03 1.020e-02
2
MN/mm 1.450e+08 2.089e+10 1.450e+05 2.089e+07 7.252e+04 1.044e+07 6.476e+04 9.327e+06 1.020e+07

MN/m2 (MPa) 1.450e+02 2.089e+04 1.450e-01 2.089e+01 7.252e-02 1.044e+01 6.476e-02 9.327e+00 1.020e+01
*For the purposes of this Trilateral Code, Mp refers to a metric ton-force or a megapond.
 B-10.2 PRESSURE OR STRESS

TO kp/m2 (kgf/m2) Mp/cm2* Mp/m2* N/mm2 (MPa) N/m2 (Pa) kN/mm2 kN/m2 MN/mm2 MN/m2 (MPa)

TO CONVERT MULTIPLY BY
2
lbf/in (psi) 7.031e+02 7.031e-05 7.031e-01 6.895e-03 6.895e+03 6.895e-06 6.895e+00 6.895e-09 6.895e-03
2
lbf/ft 4.882e+00 4.882e-07 4.882e-03 4.787e-05 4.787e+01 4.787e-08 4.787e-02 4.787e-11 4.787e-05

kip/in2 (ksi) 7.031e+05 7.031e-02 7.031e+02 6.895e+00 6.895e+06 6.895e-03 6.895e+03 6.895e-06 6.895e+00
2
kip/ft 4.882e+03 4.882e-04 4.882e+00 4.787e-02 4.787e+04 4.787e-05 4.787e+01 4.787e-08 4.787e-02

ton-force(S)/in2 1.406e+06 1.406e-01 1.406e+03 1.379e+01 1.379e+07 1.379e-02 1.379e+04 1.379e-05 1.379e+01
2
ton-force(S)/ft 9.764e+03 9.764e-04 9.764e+00 9.575e-02 9.575e+04 9.575e-05 9.575e+01 9.575e-08 9.575e-02

ton-force(L)/in2 1.575e+06 1.575e-01 1.575e+03 1.544e+01 1.544e+07 1.544e-02 1.544e+04 1.544e-05 1.544e+01
2
ton-force(L)/ft 1.093e+04 1.093e-03 1.093e+01 1.072e-01 1.072e+05 1.072e-04 1.072e+02 1.072e-07 1.072e-01

kp/cm2 (kgf/cm2) 1.000e+04 1.000e-03 1.000e+01 9.807e-02 9.807e+04 9.807e-05 9.807e+01 9.807e-08 9.807e-02
B-5

2 2
kp/m (kgf/m ) 1.000e+00 1.000e-07 1.000e-03 9.807e-06 9.807e+00 9.807e-09 9.807e-03 9.807e-12 9.807e-06
2*
Mp/cm 1.000e+07 1.000e+00 1.000e+04 9.807e+01 9.807e+07 9.807e-02 9.807e+04 9.807e-05 9.807e+01

Mp/m2* 1.000e+03 1.000e-04 1.000e+00 9.807e-03 9.807e+03 9.807e-06 9.807e+00 9.807e-09 9.807e-03
2
N/mm (MPa) 1.020e+05 1.020e-02 1.020e+02 1.000e+00 1.000e+06 1.000e-03 1.000e+03 1.000e-06 1.000e+00

N/m2 (Pa) 1.020e-01 1.020e-08 1.020e-04 1.000e-06 1.000e+00 1.000e-09 1.000e-03 1.000e-12 1.000e-06
2
kN/mm 1.020e+08 1.020e+01 1.020e+05 1.000e+03 1.000e+09 1.000e+00 1.000e+06 1.000e-03 1.000e+03

kN/m2 1.020e+02 1.020e-05 1.020e-01 1.000e-03 1.000e+03 1.000e-06 1.000e+00 1.000e-09 1.000e-03
2
MN/mm 1.020e+11 1.020e+04 1.020e+08 1.000e+06 1.000e+12 1.000e+03 1.000e+09 1.000e+00 1.000e+06

MN/m2 (MPa) 1.020e+05 1.020e-02 1.020e+02 1.000e+00 1.000e+06 1.000e-03 1.000e+03 1.000e-06 1.000e+00
*For the purposes of this Trilateral Code, Mp refers to a metric ton-force or a megapond.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

B-6
 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (SI UNITS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [Tonnes] and Spacing [m] Nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [m] Contact Length [m] Contact Width [m](1)

3.63 Tonnes 4.09 Tonnes 2.27 Tonnes 1.13 Tonnes 2.27 Tonnes
0.91 1.59 1.59
4
0.30 0.15
-1.83- -1.83- 3.05 1.22
0.15 0.15 1.98

7.26 Tonnes 8.16 Tonnes 4.99 Tonnes 2.49 Tonnes 4.99 Tonnes
C-1

2.72 2.72 2.72

8
0.30 0.20
-1.98- -1.98- 3.05 1.22
0.20 0.20 1.98

10.88 Tonnes 13.61 Tonnes 7.26 Tonnes 3.63 Tonnes 7.26 Tonnes
2.72 4.54 4.54 1.81
12
0.30 0.25
-2.74- -2.03- 3.05 1.22 3.66
0.25 0.25 1.98

14.51 Tonnes 16.79 Tonnes 8.62 Tonnes 4.31 Tonnes 8.62 Tonnes
2.72 5.90 5.90 2.27
16
0.30 0.25
-2.74- -2.13- 3.05 1.22 3.66
0.25 0.25 2.45

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (SI UNITS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [Tonnes] and Spacing [m] Nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [m] Contact Length [m] Contact Width [m](1)

18.14 Tonnes 21.77 Tonnes 9.98 Tonnes 4.99 Tonnes 9.98 Tonnes
3.63 7.71 7.71 2.72
20
0.41 0.30
2.74- -2.44- 3.05 1.22 3.66
0.30 0.25 2.45

21.77 Tonnes 25.40 Tonnes 10.89 Tonnes 5.44 Tonnes 10.89 Tonnes
C-2

4.54 9.07 9.07 2.72

24
0.46 0.30
-2.74- -2.54- 3.05 1.22 3.66
0.30 0.25 2.45

27.22 Tonnes 30.84 Tonnes 13.15 Tonnes 6.57 Tonnes 13.15 Tonnes
5.44 9.98 9.98 5.44
30
0.46 0.35
-3.35- -2.54- 3.05 1.22 3.66
0.35 0.30 2.45

36.29 Tonnes 42.63 Tonnes 15.42 Tonnes 7.71 Tonnes 15.42 Tonnes
6.35 11.79 11.79 12.70
40
0.56 0.35
-3.66- -2.84- 3.66 1.22 4.88
0.35 0.30 2.45

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (SI UNITS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [Tonnes] and Spacing [m] Nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [m] Contact Length [m] Contact Width [m](1)

45.36 Tonnes 52.62 Tons 18.14 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 18.14 Tonnes
7.26 13.61 13.61 18.14
50
0.66 0.40
-3.96- -3.25- 3.66 1.22 4.88
0.40 0.30 2.45

54.43 Tonnes 63.50 Tonnes 20.86 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 20.86 Tonnes
C-3

7.26 16.33 16.33 11.79 11.79

60
0.71 0.60
-4.27- -3.35- 3.66 1.52 4.57 1.22
0.30 0.35 2.98

63.50 Tonnes 73.02 Tonnes 23.13 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 23.13 Tonnes
9.52 19.05 19.05 12.70 12.70
70
0.79 0.66
-4.57- -3.51- 3.66 1.52 4.57 1.22
0.33 0.35 2.98

72.58 Tonnes 83.45 Tonnes 25.40 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 27.21 Tonnes
10.89 21.77 21.77 14.51 14.51
80
0.84 0.72
-4.88- -3.66- 3.66 1.52 5.49 1.52
0.36 0.40 2.98

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (SI UNITS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [Tonnes] and Spacing [m] Nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [m] Contact Length [m] Contact Width [m](1)

81.65 Tonnes 93.89 Tonnes 27.21 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 27.21 Tonnes
12.25 24.49 24.49 16.33 16.33
90
0.89 0.80
-5.18- -3.81- 3.66 1.52 5.49 1.52
0.40 0.40 2.98

90.72 Tonnes 104.33 Tons 29.03 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 29.03 Tonnes
C-4

13.61 27.22 27.22 18.14 18.14

100
0.94 0.90
-5.49- -3.96- 3.66 1.68 6.25 1.52
0.45 0.40 3.48

108.86 Tonnes 125.19 Tonnes 32.66 Tonnes 9.07 Tonnes 32.66 Tonnes
16.33 32.66 32.66 21.77 21.77
120
1.02 1.00
-6.10- -4.27- 3.66 1.83 6.10 1.52
0.50 0.40 3.48

136.08 Tonnes 154.22 Tonnes 38.10 Tonnes 9.52 Tonnes 38.10 Tonnes
19.96 38.10 38.10 29.03 29.03
150
1.27 1.00
-7.32- -4.67- 3.66 2.13 6.71 1.83
0.50 0.40 3.48

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (US CUSTOMARY)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [short tons] and Spacing [ft] nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [in] Contact Length [in] Contact Width [in](1)

4.00 Tons 4.50 Tons 2.50 Tons 1.25 Tons 2.50 Tons
1.00 1.75 1.75
4
12 6
-6- -72- 8 4 6 6 78

8.00 Tons 9.00 Tons 5.50 Tons 2.75 Tons 5.50 Tons
C-5

3.00 3.00 3.00

8
12 8
-66- -78- 10 4 8 8 78

12.00 Tons 15.00 Tons 8.00 Tons 4.00 Tons 8.00 Tons
3.00 5.00 5.00 2.00
12
12 10
-9- -80- 10 4 12 10 10 78

16.00 Tons 18.50 Tons 9.50 Tons 4.75 Tons 9.50 Tons
3.00 6.50 6.50 2.50
16
12 10
-9- -84- 10 4 12 10 10 96

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (US CUSTOMARY)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [short tons] and Spacing [ft] nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [in] Contact Length [in] Contact Width [in](1)

20.00 Tons 20.00 Tons 11.00 Tons 5.50 Tons 11.00 Tons
4.00 8.50 8.50 3.00
20
16 12
-9- -96- 10 4 12 12 10 96

24.00 Tons 28.00 Tons 12.00 Tons 6.00 Tons 12.00 Tons
C-6

5.00 10.00 10.00 3.00

24
18 12
-9- -100- 10 4 12 12 10 96

30.00 Tons 34.00 Tons 14.50 Tons 7.25 Tons 14.50 Tons
6.00 11.00 11.00 6.00
30
18 14
-11- -100- 10 4 12 14 12 96

40.00 Tons 47.00 Tons 17 Tons 8.50 Tons 17 Tons

7.00 13.00 13.00 14.00
40
22 14
-12- -112- 12 4 16 14 12 96

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (US CUSTOMARY)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [short tons] and Spacing [ft] nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [in] Contact Length [in] Contact Width [in](1)

50.00 Tons 58.00 Tons 20.00 Tons 10.00 Tons 20.00 Tons
8.00 15.00 15.00 20.00
50
26 16
-13- -128- 12 4 16 16 12 96

60.00 Tons 70.00 Tons 23.00 Tons 10.00 Tons 23.00 Tons
C-7

8.00 18.00 18.00 13.00 13.00

60
28 24
-14- -132- 12 4 15 4 12 14 117

70.00 Tons 80.50 Tons 25.50 Tons 10.00 Tons 25.50 Tons
10.50 21.00 21.00 14.00 14.00
70
31 26
-15- -138- 12 4 15 4 13 14 117

80.00 Tons 92.00 Tons 28.00 Tons 10.00 Tons 28.00 Tons
12.00 24.00 24.00 16.00 16.00
80
32 28
-16- -144- 12 5 18 5 14 16 117

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX C

CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPOTHETICAL VEHICLES USED FOR

THE RATING OF THE MLC OF VEHICLES AND BRIDGES (US CUSTOMARY)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Wheeled Vehicles
MLC Tracked Vehicles Tire Load and Axle Load and Axle Wheel Spacing
Maximum Single
Axle Load [short tons] and Spacing [ft] nominal Ground nominal Ground and nominal Ground
Axle Load
Contact Width [in] Contact Length [in] Contact Width [in](1)

90.00 Tons 103.50 Tons 30.00 Tons 10.00 Tons 30.00 Tons
13.50 27.00 27.00 18.00 18.00
90
35 31
-17- -150- 12 5 18 5 16 16 117

100.00 Tons 115.00 Tons 32.00 Tons 10.00 Tons 32.00 Tons
C-8

15.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00

100
37 35
-18- -156- 12 6 18 5 18 16 137

120.00 Tons 138.00 Tons 36.00 Tons 10.00 Tons 36.00 Tons
18.00 36.00 36.00 24.00 24.00
120
40 39
-20- -168- 12 6 18 5 20 16 137

150.00 Tons 170.00 Tons 42.00 Tonnes 10.50 Tons 42.00 Tons
22.00 42.00 42.00 32.00 32.00
150
50 39
-24- -184- 12 7 22 6 20 16 137

(1) Nominal ground contact length is as defined in column 6.

 APPENDIX D

INTERNATIONAL TEMPER EQUIVALENTS FOR ALUMINUM ALLOYS

FRG
Condition UK (DIN 17007) USA
As fabricated or manufactured M 0 F

Annealed (wrought products only) 0 1 0

Strain hardened only H1 to H8 2+3 H1 to H3

Annealed (cast products only) TS 1 0

Solution heat-treated and naturally aged to substantially TB 4+5 T1 to T4

stable condition

Cooled from an elevated temperature shaping process TE -- T5

and artificially aged

Solution heat-treated and then artificially aged TF 6+7 T6

Solution heat-treated and stabilized/artificially overaged 9 T7

Solution heat-treated, cold worked, and artificially aged TH 7 T8

T9
T10

D-1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

D-2
 APPENDIX E

COMPOSITE MATERIALS DATA FORM

Application: Designation of Supplier: Country:

(Specify)
Cured Composite
Base Material: Yes No Lay Up Geometry:
Woven fabric O O No. of layers
Filament winding O O Angles of layers
Pultrusions O O Thickness of layers
Prepregs O O Cured thickness

Cure Cycle: Physical Properties:

Density
Cured Composite Treatments: Yes No Fiber volume content
Postcure O O Void, volatile content
Thermal cycling O O Moisture content
Mechanical cycling O O Impact sensitivity
Temperature range
Test temperature
Glass transition temperature
Basic Ply Lamina*
Mechanical Properties:
Longitudinal tensile and compressive strength XT, XC
Transverse tensile and compressive strength Y T, Y C
In-plane shear strength US
Longitudinal modulus EL
Transverse modulus ET
Shear modulus GS
Poisson's ratio vL/EL = vT/ET
Longitudinal coefficient of thermal expansion L
Transverse coefficient of thermal expansion T
Resin Fiber
Designation Designation
Density Density
Glass transition temperatures Coefficient of thermal expansion
Coefficient of thermal expansion Tensile Strength
Cure shrinkage Longitudinal modulus
Tensile strength Poissons ratio
Compressive strength Tensile strain
Flexural strength
Shear strength
Tensile modulus
Compressive modulus
Shear modulus
* Data should be reported at 23 C (73 F), 50% relative humidity (RH) and at 50 C (122 F), 85% RH and at
higher or lower temperature if required.
The temperature and humidity and preconditioning of specimens at which the data was obtained should be
reported. Mean values and standard deviations should be reported for each mechanical property.

E-1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

E-2
 APPENDIX F

ADHESIVE DATA FORM

Application: Designation of System Components: Country:

(Specify)
Availability: Yes No Physical properties:
Liquid O O Density
Paste O O Volatiles
Film O O Glass transition temperature
Electric transverse resistivity
Cured mechanical properties: Saturation moisture content
Tensile lap shear as function of test temperature Swelling coefficient
and cure cycle and environmental exposure
(temperature, humidity, duration) Cure cycle:
(temperature, duration, pressure)
Climbing drum peel and/or T-peel:
(as a function of test temperature and cure cycle) Primer designation:

Cohesive tensile strength: Setting agent designation:

Stress rupture environmental test: Allowable bond thickness:

Compression modulus

Shear modulus

Elastic and non-elastic shear strain limits

Wedge crack propagation in agreed environment

F-1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

F-2
 APPENDIX G

TYPICAL BASIC PROPERTIES* OF FIBER-REINFORCED MATERIALS

BASED ON 60% FIBER VOLUME FRACTION EPOXY COMPOSITES
(Not to be used for design)

Density Ultimate Tensile Ultimate Compressive Ultimate Inplane Shear Young's Modulus
Material and Fiber Orientation (kg/m3) Strength (N/mm2) Strength (N/mm2) Strength (N/mm2) (kN/mm2)
Unidirectional Composites, 0
Carbon fiber high modulus 1550 900 750 70 200
Carbon fiber medium modulus 1540 1500 925 70 130
Carbon fiber high tensile strength 1540 1430 840 70 110
E glass 2100 1340 760 70 42
Kevlar 19 1400 1430 290 70 80

Bidirectional Composites, 0/90

Carbon fiber high modulus 1550 450 380 140 100
Carbon fiber medium modulus 1540 760 460 140 65
G-1

Carbon fiber high tensile strength 1540 670 420 160 58

E glass 2100 670 525 140 25
Kevlar 19 1400 670 210 109 42

Pseudo Isotropic Composites, 060

Carbon fiber high modulus 1550 300 420 294 63
Carbon fiber medium modulus 1540 504 504 294 46
Carbon fiber high tensile strength 1540 504 504 336 40
E glass 2100 400 420 302 18
Kevlar 19 1400 504 168 168 27
* Properties at 20 C (68 F) with preferred manufacturing methods (pultrusions, prepregs, filament winding).
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALL LEFT BLANK
G-2
 APPENDIX H

SAFETY FACTORS ON REQUIRED LIFE n FOR DESIGN AND TEST

DESIGN
Related to Related to
Type of Design Min S/N Curve (97.5%) Mean S/N Curve (50%) TEST
Fail safe 1.5 1.5 x 1.5 = 2.25 1.0 x Table*
damage tolerant

Safe life 1.5 x 1.5 = 2.25 1.5 x 2.25 = 3.37 1.5 x Table*
monitored usage

Safe life 1.5 x 10 = 15 2.25 x 10 = 22.5 10 x Table*

unmonitored usage

Safe life 1.5 x 6.7 = 10 2.25 x 6.7 = 15.08 6.7 x Table*

unmonitored, unchanged
load spectrum

Infinite life 1.33 1.33 x 1.5 = 2

* See values from table given in paragraph 8.8.4.2.
The value 1.33 is taken as that at n = 1x107 cycles for steels or 2x106 cycles for aluminum alloys.

H-1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

H-2
 APPENDIX I

LIMIT STATE DESIGN (LSD) (Provisional)

I.1 Static Design. In order to achieve a more uniform degree of safety, taking account of the
variance of loads and structural resistance, Limit State Design may be employed. Under this
procedure, both an Overload Check (paragraph I.4) and an Ultimate Check (paragraph I.5) will
be satisfied.

Structures designed in accordance with this Appendix are still required to satisfy the practical
Overload Test, as specified in paragraph 8.5.10.

I.2 Loading. Two levels of loading on the structure are considered, namely the Design Load, P,
and the Overload, O. These are defined as follows:

P = loading derived in accordance with paragraph 6.2, Design Load, P, by taking an

appropriate combination of dead and applied loads in order of decreasing severity.

O = loading derived generally as for P, but with the introduction of a further factor f.

The factor f required for determining the Overload, O, is applied to any given load in
addition to the order-of-severity factor. Its value, which varies according to the nature of the
individual load being considered, is taken from Table I.1. Thus, for dead load, D, the
contribution to the Overload would be 1.2D; while for an imposed load constituting the second
most severe applied load, A2, the contribution would be 1.33A2.

Table I.1 Partial load factor f

Load f
Dead Load: Direct effect 1.2
Countering uplift 0.8

Imposed Load (excluding wind) 1.33

Wind Load 1.20

Temperature Effect 1.00

I.3 Actions. By "Action" is meant the axial load, bending moment, shear force or torque acting
at a cross-section of a member or on the member as a whole. It also refers to the force or couple
transmitted by a joint.

Two levels of action (PA, OA) are considered, defined as follows:

PA = action arising from the application of the Design Loading, P, to the structure.

OA = action arising from the application of the Overload, O, to the structure.

I-1
I.4 Overload Checks.

I.4.1 Basic requirement. The following will be satisfied for any component (member,
joint):

R1
OA
m1

where: OA = action arising when the Overload, O, is applied to the structure (see paragraph I.3,
Actions)

R1 = resistance of the member or joint based on initial yield

m1 = factor depending on the form of construction, from Table I.2.

Table I.2 Partial Load Factors ml and m2

Construction Form m1 m2
Members: Unwelded 1.00 1.10
Welded 1.05 1.15

Joints: Bolted or Riveted 1.05 1.15

Welded 1.10 1.20

I.4.2 Resistance R1. This is the ability to withstand the action considered, which by elastic
analysis would just cause a stress to be developed equal to the appropriate value in Table I.3. In
this table, fO is the minimum specified 0.2% proof stress or yield stress of the material.

Local stress concentrations may be ignored in the determination of R1, provided they can be
absorbed by the ductility of the material.

Table I.3 Limiting Elastic Stresses for

Use in Overload Check
Stress Factor
Direct stress due to axial load fO

Direct stress due to bending 1.10fO

moment

Shear stress 0.60fO

Bearing stress 1.33fO

I.4.3 Welded members. In applying the Overload Check to welded members or joints, a
suitable allowance will be made for Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) softening adjacent to welds,
when necessary. In so doing, it is permissible to take an effective section when performing the
elastic stress analysis required for the determination of R1.

I-2
 It is generally permissible, at a partially welded cross-section, for the stress in the HAZ to
exceed the relevant Table I.3 value based on HAZ material properties. But, this does not apply
to the design of connections.

I.5 Ultimate Checks.

I.5.1 Basic requirement. The following will be satisfied for any member or joint:

R2
OA
m2

where: OA = action arising when the Overload, O, is applied to the structure (see paragraph I.3,
Actions).

R2 = calculated ultimate resistance of the member or joint.

m2 = factor depending on the form of construction, from Table I.2.

I.5.2 Resistance R2. This is the ability to just withstand the action considered without
failure in any of the following ways:

(a) Local cracking or rupture.

(b) Failure by buckling.
(c) Plastic deformation sufficient to make the member or joint unfit for use, such as
(i) Formation of a plastic hinge in a beam.
(ii) Yielding of a shear web over its full depth.
(iii) Yielding across the section of an axially loaded member.

In the determination of R2 it should be assumed that:

(a) the metal has minimum specification properties, and

(b) the fabrication procedures produce a severity of defect or imperfection that is deemed to
be just acceptable.

I.6 Combined Actions. When a component is subjected to two or more different actions
simultaneously, its acceptability will be assessed using suitable interaction formulas. This
applies to both the Overload and Ultimate checks.

I.7 Reliability Approach. Annex 1 gives a probabilistic procedure for the determination of
the factors f and m2 which may be employed instead of Tables I.1 and I.2. The factor ml should
remain unchanged.

I-3
 APPENDIX I: ANNEX 1

DETERMINATION OF PARTIAL LOAD FACTORS

I.A1.1 Paragraph I.7, Reliability Approach, permits partial load factors m2 and f to be
determined if sufficient data is available. This Annex sets out how it is to be done.

I.A1.2 In this Annex the following additional symbols are used:

M = Mean

V = Coefficient of variance

x = Parameter determining resistance X

X = Calculated resistance to actions Y (also used as suffix)

Y = Action from design load (also used as suffix)

= Safety index representing a reliability level

= Safety index representing a reliability level

m2 = Partial load factor associated with X (the material resistance)

f = Partial load factor associated with Y (the force or other action)

= Standard deviation

I.A1.3 The following steps are used in determining the partial load factors:

Step 1 - Specification of the intended reliability level.

Step 2 - Determination of Vx and Vy.

Step 3 - Calculation of partial load factors m2 and f.

I.A1.4 It is assumed that the design equation is of the type:

X
f Y
m 2

with X the characteristic value (2.5% fractile) of the structural resistance and Y the characteristic
value (97.5% fractile) of the loading.

I-4
I.A1.5 Step 1: These figures are used:

S = 3.2, failure mode affecting serviceability

L = 4.7, failure mode affecting load carrying capacity

In the case of redundancy, or components not essential for load carrying capability, can be
reduced by 0.5.

I.A1.6 Step 2: These equations are used:

x y
Vx = and Vy =
Mx My

These values are obtained by applying the square root formula and by inputting individual mean
values. For example, if the resistance is determined by a set or parameters, x1, x2,...xn, then:

X = f(x1, x2, ... xn),

M = f(m1, m2, ... mn), and

f 2
x = 1
x1

I.A1.7 Step 3: For normally distributed resistance and loading, the partial load factors are
obtained from:

1 1.96Vx 1 y Vy
m2 = and f =
1 x Vx 1 + 1.96Vy
with: if S 3.2, then x = 0.75, y = -0.75
if L 4.7, then x = 0.9, y = -0.65

I-5
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

I-6
 APPENDIX J

STANDARDS

The following list of Standards are related to the paragraphs of this Code.

Paragraph Standard(s)

3.5.3.1 ASTM E8 - Tension Testing of Metallic Materials ISO/R82, R86, R375,

EN 10002 PT 5 and BS 18

3.5.3.2 ASTM E9 - Compression Testing of Metallic Materials at Room Temperature

3.5.3.3 ASTM E238 - Pin - Type Bearing Test of Metallic Materials

3.5.3.4 ASTM B565 - Shear Testing of Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Rivets and Cold-
Heading Wire and Rods

3.5.5 ASTM E399 - Plane Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, Test for

3.6.1 ASTM D618 - Conditioning Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials for Testing

3.6.5.1 ASTM D3039 - Tensile Properties of Oriented Fiber-Resin Composites, Test for

ASTM D3410 - Compressive Properties of Unidirectional or Crossply Fiber-Resin

Composites, Test for

ASTM D3518 - In-Plane Stress-Strain Response to Unidirectional Reinforced

Plastics

3.6.6.1 ASTM D3479 - Tension - Tension Fatigue of Oriented Fiber, Resin Matrix
Composites, Test for

Paragraph Standard(s)

3.7.5 ASTM E229 - Shear Strength and Shear Modulus of Structural Adhesives, Test for

ASTM D1876 - Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test), Test for

ASTM D897 - Tensile Properties of Adhesive Bonds, Test for

ASTM D3167 - Floating Roller Peel Resistance of Adhesives, Test for

3.7.8 ASTM D2294 - Creep Properties of Adhesive in Shear by Tension Loading

(Metal/Metal), Test for

J-1
 BS3250 Part C7

4.2.1 STANAG 2021 (edition 6) - Computation of Bridge, Ferry, Raft, and Vehicle
Classifications

11.1 DOD Directive 5000.40 - Reliability and Maintainability

MIL-STD-785B - Reliability Program for Systems and Equipment, Development

and Production

MIL-STD-721C - Definitions of Terms for Reliability and Maintainability

J-2