Syllabus
Syllabus
The International Baccalaureate Organization (known as the IB) offers four high-quality
and challenging educational programmes for a worldwide community of schools, aiming
to create a better, more peaceful world. This publication is one of a range of materials
produced to support these programmes.
The IB may use a variety of sources in its work and checks information to verify accuracy
and authenticity, particularly when using community-based knowledge sources such as
Wikipedia. The IB respects the principles of intellectual property and makes strenuous
efforts to identify and obtain permission before publication from rights holders of all
copyright material used. The IB is grateful for permissions received for material used
in this publication and will be pleased to correct any errors or omissions at the earliest
opportunity.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission
of the IB, or as expressly permitted by law or by the IBs own rules and policy. See
http://www.ibo.org/copyright.
Email: [email protected]
3130
IB mission statement
The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who
help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect.
To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international organizations to develop
challenging programmes of international education and rigorous assessment.
These programmes encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate and lifelong
learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right.
Contents
Introduction1
Purpose of this document 1
The Diploma Programme 2
Nature of the subject 6
Approaches to teaching and learning business management 11
Aims17
Assessment objectives 18
Assessment objectives in practice 19
Syllabus22
Syllabus outline 22
Syllabus content 24
Assessment51
Assessment in the Diploma Programme 51
Assessment outlineSL 53
Assessment outlineHL 54
External assessment 56
Internal assessment 71
Appendices87
Formulae87
Glossary of command terms 92
This publication is intended to guide the planning, teaching and assessment of the subject in schools.
Subject teachers are the primary audience, although it is expected that teachers will use the guide to inform
students and parents about the subject.
This guide can be found on the subject page of the online curriculum centre (OCC) at http://occ.ibo.org, a
password-protected IB website designed to support IB teachers. It can also be purchased from the IB store
at http://store.ibo.org.
Additional resources
Additional publications such as specimen papers and markschemes, teacher support materials, subject
reports and grade descriptors can also be found on the OCC. Past examination papers as well as
markschemes can be purchased from the IB store.
Teachers are encouraged to check the OCC for additional resources created or used by other teachers.
Teachers can provide details of useful resources, for example: websites, books, videos, journals or teaching
ideas.
Acknowledgment
The IB wishes to thank the educators and associated schools for generously contributing time and resources
to the production of this guide.
The Diploma Programme is a rigorous pre-university course of study designed for students in the 16to19
age range. It is a broad-based two-year course that aims to encourage students to be knowledgeable and
inquiring, but also caring and compassionate. There is a strong emphasis on encouraging students to
develop intercultural understanding, open-mindedness, and the attitudes necessary for them to respect
and evaluate a range of points of view.
Figure 1
Diploma Programme model
At both levels, many skills are developed, especially those of critical thinking and analysis. At the end of
the course, students abilities are measured by means of external assessment. Many subjects contain some
element of coursework assessed by teachers.
Theory of knowledge (TOK) is a course that is fundamentally about critical thinking and inquiry into the
process of knowing rather than about learning a specific body of knowledge. The TOK course examines the
nature of knowledge and how we know what we claim to know. It does this by encouraging students to
analyse knowledge claims and explore questions about the construction of knowledge. The task of TOK is to
emphasize connections between areas of shared knowledge and link them to personal knowledge in such
a way that an individual becomes more aware of his/her own perspectives and how they might differ from
others.
Creativity, action, service (CAS) is at the heart of the Diploma Programme. The emphasis in CAS is on helping
students to develop their own identities, in accordance with the ethical principles embodied in the IB
mission statement and the IB learner profile. It involves students in a range of activities alongside their
academic studies throughout the Diploma Programme. The three strands of CAS are Creativity (arts, and
other experiences that involve creative thinking), Action (physical exertion contributing to a healthy lifestyle)
and Service (an unpaid and voluntary exchange that has a learning benefit for the student). Possibly, more
than any other component in the Diploma Programme, CAS contributes to the IBs mission to create a better
and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect.
The extended essay, including the world studies extended essay, offers the opportunity for IB students to
investigate a topic of special interest, in the form of a 4,000 word piece of independent research. The area of
research undertaken is chosen from one of the students six Diploma Programme subjects, or in the case of
the inter-disciplinary world studies essay, two subjects, and acquaints them with the independent research
and writing skills expected at university. This leads to a major piece of formally presented, structured
writing, in which ideas and findings are communicated in a reasoned and coherent manner, appropriate to
the subject or subjects chosen. It is intended to promote high-level research and writing skills, intellectual
discovery and creativity. An authentic learning experience it provides students with an opportunity to
engage in personal research on a topic of choice, under the guidance of a supervisor.
Academic honesty
Academic honesty in the Diploma Programme is a set of values and behaviours informed by the attributes
of the learner profile. In teaching, learning and assessment, academic honesty serves to promote personal
integrity, engender respect for the integrity of others and their work, and ensure that all students have an
equal opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills they acquire during their studies.
All courseworkincluding work submitted for assessmentis to be authentic, based on the students
individual and original ideas with the ideas and work of others fully acknowledged. Assessment tasks that
require teachers to provide guidance to students or that require students to work collaboratively must be
completed in full compliance with the detailed guidelines provided by the IB for the relevant subjects.
For further information on academic honesty in the IB and the Diploma Programme, please consult the IB
publications Academic honesty, The Diploma Programme: From principles into practice and General regulations:
Diploma Programme. Specific information regarding academic honesty as it pertains to external and internal
assessment components of this Diploma Programme subject can be found in this guide.
Diploma Programme candidates submit work for assessment in a variety of media that may include audio/
visual material, text, graphs, images and/or data published in print or electronic sources. If a candidate uses
the work or ideas of another person the candidate must acknowledge the source using a standard style of
referencing in a consistent manner. A candidates failure to acknowledge a source will be investigated by the
IB as a potential breach of regulations that may result in a penalty imposed by the IB final award committee.
The IB does not prescribe which style(s) of referencing or in-text citation should be used by candidates; this
is left to the discretion of appropriate faculty/staff in the candidates school. The wide range of subjects,
three response languages and the diversity of referencing styles make it impractical and restrictive to insist
on particular styles. In practice, certain styles may prove most commonly used, but schools are free to
choose a style that is appropriate for the subject concerned and the language in which candidates work is
written. Regardless of the reference style adopted by the school for a given subject, it is expected that the
minimum information given includes: name of author, date of publication, title of source, and page numbers
as applicable.
Candidates are expected to use a standard style and use it consistently so that credit is given to all sources
used, including sources that have been paraphrased or summarized. When writing text a candidate must
clearly distinguish between their words and those of others by the use of quotation marks (or other method
like indentation) followed by an appropriate citation that denotes an entry in the bibliography. If an electronic
source is cited, the date of access must be indicated. Candidates are not expected to show faultless expertise
in referencing, but are expected to demonstrate that all sources have been acknowledged. Candidates must
be advised that audio/visual material, text, graphs, images and/or data published in print or in electronic
sources that is not their own must also attribute the source. Again, an appropriate style of referencing/
citation must be used.
Business management
Business management is a rigorous, challenging and dynamic discipline in the individuals and societies
subject group. The role of businesses, as distinct from other organizations and actors in a society, is to
produce and sell goods and services that meet human needs and wants by organizing resources. Profit-
making, risk-taking and operating in a competitive environment characterize most business organizations.
Although business management shares many skills and areas of knowledge with other humanities and
social sciences, it is distinct in a number of ways. For example business management is the study of decision-
making within an organization, whereas economics is the study of scarcity and resource allocation, both on
micro and macro levels. Business management examines the use of information technology in business
contexts, whereas information technology in a global society (ITGS) critically examines its impact on other
fields, such as health and government.
The Diploma Programme business management course is designed to develop students knowledge
and understanding of business management theories, as well as their ability to apply a range of tools
and techniques. Students learn to analyse, discuss and evaluate business activities at local, national and
international levels. The course covers a range of organizations from all sectors, as well as the socio-cultural
and economic contexts in which those organizations operate.
Emphasis is placed on strategic decision-making and the operational business functions of human resource
management, finance and accounts, marketing and operations management. Links between the topics are
central to the course, as this integration promotes a holistic overview of business management. Through
the exploration of six concepts underpinning the subject (change, culture, ethics, globalization, innovation
and strategy), the business management course allows students to develop their understanding of
interdisciplinary concepts from a business management perspective.
The course encourages the appreciation of ethical concerns, as well as issues of corporate social
responsibility (CSR), at both a local and global level. Through the study of topics such as human resource
management, organizational growth and business strategy, the course aims to develop transferable
skills relevant to todays students. These include the ability to: think critically; make ethically sound and
well-informed decisions; appreciate the pace, nature and significance of change; think strategically; and
undertake long term planning, analysis and evaluation. The course also develops subject-specific skills,
such as financial analysis.
recommended hours devoted to teaching (240 hours for HL compared to 150 hours for SL)
extra depth and breadth required (extension units for HL)
nature of the internal assessment task
nature of the examination questions.
Theory of knowledge
Students in this subject group explore the interactions between humans and their environment in time and
place. As a result, these subjects are often known collectively as the humanities or social sciences.
As with other subject areas, knowledge in individuals and societies subjects can be gained in a variety of
ways. For example, archival evidence, data collection, experimentation, observation, and inductive and
deductive reasoning can all be used to help explain patterns of behaviour that lead to knowledge claims.
Students in individuals and societies subjects are required to evaluate these knowledge claims by exploring
concepts such as validity, reliability, credibility, certainty and individual as well as cultural perspectives
through knowledge questions.
The relationship between individuals and societies subjects and TOK is of crucial importance and fundamental
to the Diploma Programme. Having followed a course of study in individuals and societies, students should
be able to reflect critically on the various ways of knowing and methods used in human sciences, and in
doing so, become inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people (IB mission statement).
During the business management course, a number of issues will arise that highlight the relationships
between TOK and business management. Some of the questions that could be considered during the
course are identified below in relation to the six concepts that underpin the course as well as within the
syllabus. Teachers and their students are encouraged to explore further questions of their own.
Some knowledge questions that could be considered during the course are identified below. These are
presented in relation to the concepts of change, culture, ethics, globalization, innovation and strategy that
underpin the course and so reflect more overarching questions. Suggested links to TOK are also identified
at the end of each unit.
To what extent does our culture determine or shape what we believe or know?
To what extent are we aware of the impact of culture on what we believe or know?
Culture Is it possible to objectively evaluate how a culture impacts on our beliefs and
knowledge?
Are there any knowledge claims about business that are true across cultures?
Does globalization unify our values, beliefs and knowledge or lead to their
greater fragmentation?
Are some ways of knowing more useful than others when trying to understand
the process of globalization and its effects?
To what extent is our knowledge and understanding of complex phenomena
Globalization
such as globalization dependent on our particular perspective?
Business management uses case studies, a research method most commonly
associated with the human sciences. What are the benefits and drawbacks
of this in a globalized world? How else does the methodology of the human
sciences differ from the methodology of other areas of knowledge?
In addition to helping students learn more about active and responsible citizenship, students of business
management acquire skills supportive of their CAS activities. They learn about strategic thinking and setting
objectives, acquire planning skills and develop an appreciation for different cultural perspectives within
organizations. These skills will help them choose significant CAS activities and gain much from them.
Many business organizations have social or environmental objectives. These can be primary, (as in the case
of social enterprises or non-profit organizations) or secondary (as in the case of CSR programs). Students in
the business management course learn of such organizations and programs through examples, case studies
and their internal assessment work. This may give them ideas and contacts for entrepreneurial service
learning projects. Similarly, service activities with a business affiliation may get students interested in a
particular organization or industry, which they would then explore further in their business management
course. Teachers are encouraged to help students identify such opportunities.
Extended essay
The world of business management offers much potential for creative extended essays. Living in an
increasingly globalized world, students are involved as actors in what businesses do, from being consumers
of goods and services to being campaigners for increased social responsibility. Fascinating decision-making
takes place within business organizations in areas such as human resource management, production and
marketing. Students have a genuine interest in many aspects of business management and thus may wish
to explore them in more depth through their own independent research.
Although students are expected to base their extended essay on secondary resources, there are
opportunities for primary research as well, to be applied where appropriate. Students may wish to use
secondary material such as company data, which is often accessible due to the reporting requirements
of businesses. The use of interviews and surveys with managers and other stakeholders may also be
undertaken and these present students with opportunities to explore the real-world application of business
tools, techniques and theories.
The breadth and depth of the business management course facilitates students researching topics that allow for
meaningful and relevant links to be made between the syllabus and the requirements of the extended essay.
The interdisciplinary, issue-based approach of the world studies extended essay also offers a wealth of
opportunities for independent research that draws on the discipline of business management, in addition
to at least one other discipline. Students could examine the role of businesses decision-making processes
in terms of their effects on the environment or the way in which international standards relating to work
practices and human rights manifest themselves at a local level. Students who choose to undertake a world
studies extended essay should be encouraged to think about their essays in relation to global themes. This
may be an opportunity for students to make use of the six concepts that underpin the business management
course in their extended essay work.
The course encourages the use of contemporary examples and case studies at a variety of levels, from
the local to the global, as well as from smaller-scale businesses to multinational ones. Throughout the
course, teachers have the opportunity to choose case studies that reflect the cultural context in which they
are teaching as well as case studies that allow for comparisons across cultural contexts. The six concepts
underpinning the course create a framework for these discussions. The course is designed to give students
an international perspective and to encourage their appreciation of cultural diversity among different types
of business organizations, and individuals and groups within them.
The course promotes the ideals of international cooperation and responsible citizenship. Students
are encouraged to make sense of the forces and circumstances that drive and restrain change in an
interdependent and multicultural world. Thus, the Diploma Programme business management course
contributes to students developments as critical and effective participants in local, national and world
affairsbusiness and otherwise.
Like all IB courses, the Diploma Programme business management course is influenced by a number
of underlying pedagogical principles. Especially important strategies for business management are
conceptually focused teaching and contextualized teaching through the use of case studies and examples.
The ability to research is a key skill for students studying the course.
The relationship between concepts, the contexts and content of the discipline of business management
can be illustrated with a triangular diagram. Concepts are anchored in the tools, techniques and theories of
the subject and come alive through case studies and examples. Together, these help students to acquire a
holistic and integrated understanding of business management.
Concepts
(change, culture, ethics,
globalization, innovation,
strategy)
Contexts Content
(case studies and examples) (business management tools,
techniques and theories
in the syllabus)
Figure 2
The integrated relationships of concepts, content and contexts in business management
The following section, as well as the teacher support material available on the OCC, contains more specific
guidance and suggestions on approaching the teaching and learning of the Diploma Programme business
management course. This guidance is not exhaustive, and through their own planning, teachers should
explore a range of teaching and learning experiences.
Change
Culture
Ethics
Globalization
Innovation
Strategy.
Some teachers may choose to teach the business management course in a linear way, topic-by-topic. Other
teachers may prefer to organize the syllabus content around the six key concepts. Regardless, all teachers
should explicitly integrate a conceptual approach to their current practice.
facilitate disciplinary and interdisciplinary learning and allow for connections with other subjects.
deepen students understanding of todays complex and dynamic business environments.
allow teachers to frame the most important ideas that have relevance for the subject but also transcend
it. Consequently, students learn to analyse and evaluate individual and collective behaviours and
topical phenomena not only in business contexts but in the society at large.
allow students to integrate new content into already existing understandings.
Working with a conceptual approach prepares students for a part of their assessment. The six concepts are a
part of the formal assessment of the course at both SL and HL. In one of their examination papers, students
are asked to use two of the six concepts to discuss the situation and issues faced by real-world organizations
they have studied during the course, making use of business management tools, techniques and theories.
The following table provides brief understandings of the six concepts and offers some suggestions as to
how they may be explored through specific subject content. The examples are in no way prescriptive, and
in their planning, teachers should identify and map areas of the syllabus, and suitable case studies and
examples that will allow them to explore these concepts with their students.
A teachers own carefully designed scheme of work will explore the relationships between these concepts,
the tools, techniques and theories of business management, and appropriate examples and case studies.
The Business management teacher support material provides further guidance on teaching through concepts.
The resources may cover a wide range of contemporary business issues, such as globalization, new business
models centred on social and environmental issues, CSR, the role of product quality or the changing nature
of marketing. Please note that these are suggestions and the choice of issues should be of interest to
students and reflect current debates in the business world.
The following approach is helpful when teaching through case studies and examples.
Identify the context and issues raised by the case study or example.
Explain how these issues relate to different areas of the syllabus and the six concepts.
Apply the business tools, techniques and theories that might be appropriate for understanding the
issues raised in the case study or example.
Discuss and, if appropriate, recommend alternatives to the issues raised.
Students are able to use their work with case studies and examples in their assessment. Familiarity with
the case study approach is important for a successful treatment of the pre-seen case study and of stimulus
materials given in the examination papers. Moreover, in the conceptual examination questions, students
are asked to use two of the six concepts to discuss the context, situation and issues faced by real-world
organizations they have studied during the course. Finally, for their internal assessment at both SL and HL,
students have to focus on a problem, issue or decision faced by a real-world organization.
The Business management teacher support material provides further guidance on teaching through case
studies and examples.
Research skills
Potential extended essay work in business management, the internal assessment at both SL and HL, and
their preparation for the conceptual examination questions provide opportunities for students to explore
and develop their research skills. These include the identification of relevant materials, the design of data
collection techniques, the collection and analysis of data, and the ability to evaluate and draw conclusions
from data. Teachers are encouraged to discuss appropriate research methods with students. The Business
management teacher support material provides further guidance on research skills.
While conceptually focused teaching, contextual teaching and research skills are highlighted as particularly
relevant approaches to teaching and learning in business management, the course offers opportunities for
teachers and students to explore a range of teaching and learning experiences. Teachers are encouraged to
discuss their strategies on the OCC.
Prior learning
No particular background in terms of specific subjects for national or international qualifications is expected
or required, and no prior knowledge of business management is necessary for students to undertake a
course of study based on this specification. However, a familiarity with business concepts would be an
advantage, as would completing the individuals and societies course in the Middle Years Programme (MYP).
Students coming from the MYP are familiar with a conceptual approach to learning. Among their key
and related concepts in the individuals and societies subject group, they will have studied the concepts
of change, culture, ethics, globalization, innovation and strategy, which will be further developed in the
Diploma Programme business management course. Conceptual analysis in the business management
course is expected to have an increasing degree of sophistication and disciplinary specificity.
The development of certain skills in the MYP individuals and societies subject group is also excellent
preparation for a Diploma Programme course in business management, which requires the student to
undertake research, demonstrate understanding and knowledge of content and concepts, and exhibit the
capacity to think critically.
For example, the following specific skills, which are identified and developed in the MYP individuals and
societies subject group, are encouraged in the Diploma Programme business management course:
the ability to use sources such as graphs and tables in a critical manner
the ability to analyse and interpret information from a wide range of sources
the ability to communicate information and ideas using an appropriate style for the intended audience
and purpose
the ability to analyse concepts, events, issues and arguments
the ability to make well-substantiated decisions and to relate them to real-world contexts.
Aims
The aims of all subjects in the individuals and societies are to:
1. encourage the systematic and critical study of: human experience and behaviour; physical, economic
and social environments; the history and development of social and cultural institutions
2. develop in the student the capacity to identify, analyse critically and evaluate theories, concepts and
arguments about the nature and activities of the individual and society
3. enable the student to collect, describe and analyse data used in studies of society, and to test
hypotheses and interpret complex data and source material
4. promote the appreciation of the way in which learning is relevant to both the culture in which the
student lives and the cultures of other societies
5. develop an awareness in the student that human attitudes and opinions are widely diverse and that a
study of society requires an appreciation of such diversity
6. enable the student to recognize that the content and methodologies of the individuals and societies
subjects are contestable and that their study requires the tolerance of uncertainty.
The aims of the business management course at HL and SL are to:
Assessment objectives
By the end of the business management course, students are expected to reach the following assessment
objectives.
Command terms
Command terms are used both in the syllabus content and in examination questions to indicate depth of
treatment. They are classified below according to the assessment objective (AO) levels.
Cognitive demands progress from AO1 to AO3, while AO4 terms are specific to particular skills. Teachers
and students must be familiar with the assessment objective levels and the command terms in order to
understand the depth of treatment required in teaching and in examination questions.
In the syllabus content, the assessment objective levels are specified instead of particular command terms.
This gives teachers flexibility to work with the most relevant command terms at the given assessment
objective level.
For use of command terms in examination questions, please refer to the assessment section of this guide.
The command terms within each assessment objective level are listed in alphabetical order in the following
table. Definitions of the terms are listed in the Glossary of command terms in the appendix to this guide.
Distinguish
Explain
Suggest
Evaluate
Examine
Justify
Recommend
To what extent
Syllabus outline
Teaching hours
Syllabus component
SL HL
Teaching hours
Syllabus component
SL HL
Unit 4: Marketing 35 50
4.1 The role of marketing
4.2 Marketing planning (including introduction to the four Ps)
4.3 Sales forecasting (HL only)
4.4 Market research
4.5 The four Ps (product, price, promotion, place)
4.6 The extended marketing mix of seven Ps (HL only)
4.7 International marketing (HL only)
4.8 E-commerce
Internal assessment 15 30
Total teaching hours 150 240
The recommended teaching time is 240 hours to complete HL courses and 150 hours to complete SL courses
as stated in the document General regulations: Diploma Programme (page 4, article 8.2).
The curriculum model for Diploma Programme business management is a core curriculum for HL and SL
consisting of five obligatory units with common content and learning outcomes. In addition to the core,
HL students are expected to complete extension areas of study in all five units, adding depth and breadth
to the course. The above teaching hours are suggestions only, and teachers may choose to allocate their
teaching time between the units differently.
Syllabus content
Both SL and HL students learn to apply fundamental strategy models such as social, technological,
economic, environmental, political, legal and ethical (STEEPLE) analysis as well as the strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis; HL students also learn to apply and evaluate more specific tools
such as fishbone diagrams, decision-trees and force field analysis. However, given the importance of the
overarching business themes introduced in unit 1, most content is common to both levels.
As this unit provides students with an overview of business management both as a topic of study (what
the subject covers overall) and as a professional practice (what business managers do), it lends itself to
many TOK considerations. On the one hand, students may inquire into how and why a particular model
becomes established as a mainstream strategy model. On the other hand, they may ask on what basis
business managers make decisions in the real world. Unit 1 is also an open invitation to consider a range of
international examples, especially in relation to issues of globalization, and to address businesses ethical,
social or environmental obligations, which fits well with the IB learner profile in terms of developing
principled thinkers. It may also provide the impetus for entrepreneurial service learning projects in the local
community as part of students CAS requirement.
1.4 Stakeholders
Although cultural issues are addressed throughout this unit, HL students also examine organizational
(corporate) culture as well as industrial/employee relations. This gives them more tools to analyse the
relationship between different stakeholder groups as well as the role of individuals in a business.
While unit 2 focuses primarily on people issues, these also form part of the discussions in other units of the
course. For example: in unit 1, social and demographic changes are discussed as drivers of strategy; in unit 4,
customers are in focus; while in unit 5, innovation is examined.
As the unit deals with the interactions between humans and their environments, students have an
opportunity to reflect critically and creatively on many TOK considerations. Students may ask how knowledge
is generated individually and collectively within an organization, how it is internally and externally validated,
and how it may or may not be questioned. Similarly, topics such as persuasion (essential for leadership and
collective bargaining) and the consequences of actions and decisions (for instance, in relation to recruiting
or dismissing staff) can be examined. In terms of the IB learner profile, it may be interesting to study to what
extent the characteristics of the profile are present (and valued) in business contexts.
2.4 Motivation
HL students explore aspects of finance and accounts in more depth through the study of further efficiency
ratios, investment appraisals and budgets.
Finance transcends mere numbers and connects to the six concepts underpinning the course. The
profitability and financial health of an organization may significantly influence its strategy, ethics, and need
and willingness to changeand vice versa. The challenge of accounting is for an organization to represent
itself through the common language of financial statements, which raises many TOK considerations,
for example in relation to the truth that may or may not be found in numbers. Unit 3 also provides
opportunities for students to think about the attributes of the IB learner profile. They may inquire which
characteristics of the learner profile are and, in their view, ought to be valued in accounting and, more
broadly, in the financial markets.
capital expenditure
revenue expenditure
Unit 4: Marketing
Marketing is an essential business function: it creates a bridge between an organization and its customers.
In our everyday speech, the word marketing is often associated with advertisements and finding innovative
ways of getting people to buy a product or service. However, unit 4 shows students that marketing is much
more than that. Effective marketing requires consideration of everything from product quality to consumer
perceptions and increasingly, engagement with peoples everyday lives to uncover needs that customers
may not even be aware of themselves.
Both SL and HL students learn the marketing mix of the four Psthe essential ingredients of marketing
planning: product, price, promotion and place (distribution). At HL, this model is expanded to the seven
Ps: students also explore how people, processes and physical evidence can be applied to the marketing of
services. HL students also examine international marketing in greater depth. This gives them an appreciation
for how marketing strategies and practices are both a reflection of and an influence on the culture in which
they are applied.
Given the strategic nature of marketing, unit 4 is closely linked to the other business functions students study
in the business management course. For instance, market research may lead to new strategic objectives
(unit 1) that impact on production (unit 5), human resource planning (unit 2) and profitability (unit 3).
Unit 4 provides an ideal opportunity for teachers and students to explore case studies and examples that
are contemporary, relevant and of direct interest to students. Marketing also allows students to develop
their conceptual understanding. The unit ties to all concepts underpinning the course: marketing decisions
are strategic and have ethical and cultural implications. Here, the degree to which marketing is globalized
can be examined. Innovating and being aware or even ahead of social changes are essential elements
of effective marketing. Thus, students learn to discuss and evaluate marketing decisions from a range of
perspectives, combining inquiry, critical thinking and cross-cultural understanding.
Product
Price
Promotion
Place
People
Processes
Physical evidence
4.8 E-commerce
Unit 5 is the part of the business management course where the relative weight of the HL material is
greatest. Both SL and HL students look at different production methods and their implications as well as
different ways of organizing production. At HL, students explore additional areas such as lean production,
quality management, and research and development.
Operations management is the how to of business management. Still, it ties intimately to the what
question of an organizations objectives (unit 1): a new strategic direction means adjustments in operations.
Good human resource management at all levels in an organization, in turn, is a pre-requisite of successful
operations (unit 2). Cooperation between marketing, with the closest relation to customers, and operations,
which put new ideas into practice, is also significant (unit 4).
Unit 5 can be taught through case studies in a variety of settings; visits to factories or service businesses are
a good way to make the topic come alive. This unit has a very concrete dimension that invites students to
explore and understand the importance of manufacturing and other types of operations, bringing the other
units of the course together in a dynamic way. The nature of operations is varied and rapidly evolving across
industries and locations, and thus there are plenty of opportunities to explore the concepts of change,
culture, ethics, globalization and innovation.
less waste
greater efficiency
5.4 Location
General
Assessment is an integral part of teaching and learning. The most important aims of assessment in the
Diploma Programme are that it should support curricular goals and encourage appropriate student
learning. Both external and internal assessments are used in the Diploma Programme. IBexaminers mark
work produced for external assessment, while work produced for internal assessment is marked by teachers
and externally moderated by theIB.
Formative assessment informs both teaching and learning. It is concerned with providing accurate
and helpful feedback to students and teachers on the kind of learning taking place and the nature of
students strengths and weaknesses in order to help develop students understanding and capabilities.
Formative assessment can also help to improve teaching quality, as it can provide information to
monitor progress towards meeting the course aims and objectives.
Summative assessment gives an overview of previous learning and is concerned with measuring
student achievement.
The Diploma Programme primarily focuses on summative assessment designed to record student
achievement at, or towards the end of, the course of study. However, many of the assessment instruments
can also be used formatively during the course of teaching and learning, and teachers are encouraged to
do this. A comprehensive assessment plan is viewed as being integral with teaching, learning and course
organization. For further information, see the IB Programme standards and practices document.
The approach to assessment used by the IB is criterion-related, not norm-referenced. This approach to
assessment judges students work by their performance in relation to identified levels of attainment, and
not in relation to the work of other students. For further information on assessment within the Diploma
Programme please refer to the publication Diploma Programme assessment: Principles and practice.
To support teachers in the planning, delivery and assessment of the Diploma Programme courses, a variety
of resources can be found on the OCC or purchased from the IBstore (http://store.ibo.org). Additional
publications such as specimen papers and markschemes, teacher support materials, subject reports and
grade descriptors can be found on the OCC. Past examination papers as well as markschemes can be
purchased from the IBstore.
Methods of assessment
The IB uses several methods to assess work produced by students.
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria are used when the assessment task is open-ended. Each criterion concentrates on
a particular skill that students are expected to demonstrate. An assessment objective describes what
students should be able to do, and assessment criteria describe how well they should be able to do it. Using
assessment criteria allows discrimination between different answers and encourages a variety of responses.
Each criterion comprises a set of hierarchically ordered level descriptors. Each level descriptor is worth one
or more marks. Each criterion is applied independently using a best-fit model. The maximum marks for each
criterion may differ according to the criterions importance. The marks awarded for each criterion are added
together to give the total mark for the piece of work.
Markbands
Markbands are a comprehensive statement of expected performance against which responses are judged.
They represent a single holistic criterion divided into level descriptors. Each level descriptor corresponds
to a range of marks to differentiate student performance. A best-fit approach is used to ascertain which
particular mark to use from the possible range for each level descriptor.
Analytic markschemes
Analytic markschemes are prepared for those examination questions that expect a particular kind of
response and/or a given final answer from students. They give detailed instructions to examiners on how to
break down the total mark for each question for different parts of the response.
Marking notes
For some assessment components marked using assessment criteria, marking notes are provided. Marking
notes give guidance on how to apply assessment criteria to the particular requirements of a question.
The IB document Candidates with assessment access requirements provides details on all the inclusive
assessment arrangements available to candidates with learning support requirements. The IB document
Learning diversity in the International Baccalaureate programmes: Special educational needs within the
International Baccalaureate programmes outlines the position of the IB with regard to candidates with diverse
learning needs in the IB programmes. For candidates affected by adverse circumstances, the IB documents
General regulations: Diploma Programme and the Handbook of procedures for the Diploma Programme provide
details on access consideration.
Assessment outlineSL
Assessment outlineHL
Research project
Student s research and rep or t on an issue f acing an organiz ation or
a decision to be made by an organiz ation (or several organiz ations).
Maximum 2000 words. (25 marks)
External assessment
Analytic markschemes
Markbands
Assessment criteria (for paper 1 and paper 2 extended response questions)
For both examination papers, there are analytic markschemes, markbands and assessment criteria.
The markbands and assessment criteria are related to the assessment objectives established for the business
management course and the individuals and societies grade descriptors, and are published in this guide.
The analytic markschemes are specific to each examination and are published separately in a markscheme
document.
Written papers
The external assessment of the Diploma Programme business management course consists of two
examination papers at SL and at HL that are externally set and externally marked. They are designed to
allow students to demonstrate their competencies in relation to the business management assessment
objectives. All questions on the examination papers are based on specifications in this guide.
The external components contribute 75% to the final assessment at both SL and HL.
In common with all Diploma Programme examination papers, students at SL and HL are given five minutes
of reading time before they begin answering the papers.
Command terms
Teachers and students must be familiar with the command terms used at each assessment objective level
to understand the depth of treatment required in examination questions. Cognitive demands progress from
AO1 to AO3, while AO4 terms are specific to particular skills.
Examination questions may use any command term from the assessment objective level specified in the
Syllabus content section or a less demanding command term from a lower level. For example, if the
assessment objective level for a topic is AO2, an examination question could contain any of the command
terms for AO2, such as explain, distinguish, interpret and so forth. Alternatively, the examination
question could contain a command term from AO1, such as describe. However, a more demanding
command term, such as evaluate, from a higher level (AO3 in this case), cannot be used.
The command terms used in each question or part thereof indicate the depth required. The command terms
are organized by assessment objective level in the Assessment objectives section earlier in the guide and
defined in the Glossary of command terms in the appendix.
Use of calculators
While all questions requiring a calculator can be answered fully using a four-function (plus, minus, multiply,
divide) calculator, graphic display calculators (GDCs) are allowed during the examination.
Teachers and schools must adhere to the regulations regarding the use of electronic calculators in
examinations, and students must be made aware of these. This information can be found in the relevant
section of the Handbook of procedures for the Diploma Programme.
1. Demonstrate knowledge X X
and understanding
2. Demonstrate application X X
and analysis
3. Demonstrate synthesis X
and evaluation
4. Demonstrate a variety of X X
appropriate skills
Section A
Questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5 of the syllabus and refer to the prescribed pre-
seen case study.
Students answer two structured questions in total from a choice of three.
The questions are each subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each part indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; and a variety of
appropriate skills.
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Each question is worth 10 marks.
Section A is worth a total of 20 marks.
Section B
The questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5 of the syllabus and are primarily based on the
additional stimulus material given on the day of the examination.
Students answer one compulsory structured question.
The question is subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each part indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; synthesis and
evaluation; and a variety of appropriate skills.
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Section B is worth a total of 20 marks.
Marks are allocated using a combination of an analytic markscheme and markbands.
Paper 2
Duration: 1 hour and 45 minutes
Weighting: 45%
This paper is divided into three sections. The structure of this paper is the same as HL paper 2. However,
questions may be the same as, similar to, or different from, those used for the HL paper. SL students answer
fewer questions.
1. Demonstrate X X X
knowledge and
understanding
2. Demonstrate X X X
application and
analysis
3. Demonstrate X X
synthesis and
evaluation
4. Demonstrate X X X
a variety of
appropriate skills
Section A
The questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5.
The questions have a quantitative focus.
Students answer one structured question based on unseen stimulus material from a choice of two.
The questions are subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each part indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; and a variety of
appropriate skills
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Each question is worth 10 marks.
Section A is worth a total of 10 marks.
Section B
The questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5 of the syllabus.
Students answer one structured question based on unseen stimulus material from a choice of three.
Section C
The principal focus of questions in this section is on the concepts of change, culture, ethics,
globalization, innovation and strategy that underpin the business management course.
While the principal focus for each question is on two of the concepts, students need to draw on their
knowledge of other relevant topics in the syllabus.
There is no stimulus material provided for the questions.
Students are required to address the question in relation to at least one real-world organization but
may use information from a range of sources, which may include real-world case studies examined in
class and IA research. The real-world organization that students use in their responses must not be the
case study organization featured in paper 1.
The response should consider the perspectives of individuals and societies on which the real-world
organization impacts.
Students answer one extended response question from a choice of three.
Assessment objective level 3 (AO3) command terms are used in the questions.
The questions require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; synthesis and
evaluation; and a variety of appropriate skills.
Each question is worth 20 marks.
Section C is worth a total of 20 marks.
For section C, marks are allocated using assessment criteria. Marking notes included in the markscheme
give additional guidance on how to apply the assessment criteria.
1. Demonstrate X X X
knowledge and
understanding
2. Demonstrate X X X
application and
analysis
3. Demonstrate X X
synthesis and
evaluation
4. Demonstrate X X X
a variety of
appropriate skills
Section A
Questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5, which could include the HL extension of the
syllabus, and refer to the prescribed pre-seen case study.
Students answer two structured questions in total from a choice of three.
Each question is subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each question indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; and a variety of
appropriate skills.
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Each question is worth 10 marks.
Section A is worth a total of 20 marks.
Section B
The questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5 and HL extension of the syllabus and are
primarily based on the additional stimulus material given on the day of the examination.
Students answer one compulsory structured question.
The question is subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each part indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; synthesis and
evaluation; and a variety of appropriate skills.
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Section B question is worth a total of 20 marks.
For sections A and B, marks are allocated using a combination of an analytic markscheme and markbands.
Section C
The question in this section is drawn from units 1 to 5 and HL extension of the syllabus and is primarily
based on the additional stimulus material given on the day of the examination.
The response should consider the perspectives of individuals and societies that the organization in
the prescribed case study impacts upon.
Students answer one compulsory extended response question.
Assessment objective level three (AO3) command terms are used in the questions.
The questions require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; synthesis and
evaluation; and a variety of appropriate skills.
Each question is worth 20 marks.
Section C is worth a total of 20 marks.
For section C, marks are allocated using assessment criteria. Marking notes included in the markscheme
give additional guidance on how to apply the assessment criteria.
Paper 2
Duration: 2 hours 15 minutes
Weighting: 40%
This paper is divided into three sections. The structure of this paper is the same as SL paper 2. However,
questions may be the same as, similar to, or different from, those used for the SL paper. HL students answer
more questions.
1. Demonstrate X X X
knowledge and
understanding
2. Demonstrate X X X
application and
analysis
3. Demonstrate X X
synthesis and
evaluation
4. Demonstrate X X X
a variety of
appropriate skills
Section A
The questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5 and HL extension of the syllabus.
The questions have a quantitative focus.
Students answer one structured question based on unseen stimulus material from a choice of two.
The question is subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each part indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; and a variety of
appropriate skills.
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Each question is worth 10 marks.
Section A is worth a total of 10 marks.
Section B
The questions in this section are drawn from units 1 to 5 and HL extension of the syllabus.
Students answer two structured questions based on stimulus material from a choice of three.
The questions are each subdivided into parts.
The command terms used in each part indicate the depth required.
The questions may require: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; synthesis and
evaluation and a variety of appropriate skills.
The marks available for each part are indicated on the examination paper.
Each question is worth 20 marks.
Section B is worth a total of 40 marks.
For sections A and B, marks are allocated using a combination of an analytic markscheme and markbands.
Section C
The principal focus of questions in this section is on the concepts of change, culture, ethics,
globalization, innovation and strategy that underpin the business management course.
While the principal focus for each question is on two of the concepts, students need to draw on their
knowledge of other relevant topics in the syllabus, including the HL extension.
There is no stimulus material provided for the questions.
Students are required to address the question in relation to one real-world organization but may use
information from a range of sources, which may include real-world case studies examined in class
and IA research. The real-world organization that students use in their response must not be the case
study organization featured in paper 1.
The response should consider the perspectives of individuals and societies upon which the real-world
organization impacts.
Students answer one extended response question from a choice of three.
Assessment objective level 3 (AO3) command terms are used in each question.
Each question requires: knowledge and understanding; application and analysis; synthesis and
evaluation; and a variety of appropriate skills.
Each question is worth 20 marks.
Section C is worth a total of 20 marks.
For section C, marks are allocated using assessment criteria. Marking notes included in the markscheme
give additional guidance on how to apply the assessment criteria.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
34 A description or partial analysis of some relevant issues with some use of business
management tools (where applicable), techniques and theories.
Some use of appropriate terminology.
Some reference to the stimulus material that goes beyond the name of a person(s)
and/or the name of the organization.
At the lower end of the markband, responses are mainly theoretical.
56 An analysis of the relevant issues with good use of business management tools
(where applicable), techniques and theories.
Use of appropriate terminology throughout the response.
Effective use of the stimulus material.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
910 Good understanding of the demands of the question, including implications, where
relevant.
Relevant business management tools (where applicable), techniques and theories
are explained clearly and applied purposefully, and appropriate terminology is used
throughout the response.
Effective use of the stimulus material in a way that significantly strengthens the
response.
Evidence of balance is consistent throughout the response.
The judgments are relevant and well substantiated.
HL paper 1, section C
SL paper 2, section C
HL paper 2, section C.
HL paper 1, section C
There are five assessment criteria for this question type.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
Criterion B: Application
This criterion addresses the extent to which the student is able to apply the relevant business management
tools, techniques and theories to the case study organization.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 The relevant business management tools, techniques and theories are connected to the
case study organization, but this connection is inappropriate or superficial.
2 The relevant business management tools, techniques and theories are appropriately
connected to the case study organization, but this connection is not developed.
3 The relevant business management tools, techniques and theories are generally well
applied to explain the situation and issues of the case study organization, though the
explanation may lack some depth or breadth. Examples are provided.
4 The relevant business management tools, techniques and theories are well applied to
explain the situation and issues of the case study organization. Examples are appropriate
and illustrative.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
4 Relevant, balanced arguments are made and these are well justified.
Criterion D: Structure
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student organizes his or her ideas with clarity, and presents a
structured piece of writing comprised of:
an introduction
a body
a conclusion
fit-for-purpose paragraphs.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Two or fewer of the structural elements are present, and few ideas are clearly organized.
2 Three of the structural elements are present, or most ideas are clearly organized.
3 Three or four of the structural elements are present, and most ideas are clearly organized.
4 All of the structural elements are present, and ideas are clearly organized.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
3 Good understanding of one or both of the given concepts is demonstrated. The business
management content selected is relevant, though it may not be sufficient. The relevant
content is generally well explained, though the explanation may lack some depth or
breadth.
Criterion B: Application
This criterion addresses the extent to which the student is able to apply the given concepts and the relevant
business management content (theories, techniques or tools, depending on the requirements of the
question) to his or her chosen real-world organization(s). The real-world organization(s) must not be the
organization featured in the prescribed case study for paper 1.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 The given concepts and/or any relevant business management content are connected to
the real-world organization(s), but this connection is inappropriate or superficial.
2 The given concepts and/or relevant business management content are connected
appropriately to the real-world organization(s), but this connection is not developed.
3 The given concepts and relevant business management content are generally well
applied to explain the situation and issues of the real-world organization(s), though the
explanation may lack some depth or breadth. Examples are provided.
4 The given concepts and relevant business management content are well applied
to explain the situation and issues of the real-world organization(s). Examples are
appropriate and illustrative.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
4 Relevant, balanced arguments are made and these are well justified.
Criterion D: Structure
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student organizes his or her ideas with clarity, and presents a
structured piece of writing comprised of:
an introduction
a body
a conclusion
fit-for-purpose paragraphs.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Two or fewer of the structural elements are present, and few ideas are clearly organized.
2 Three of the structural elements are present, or most ideas are clearly organized.
3 Three or four of the structural elements are present, and most ideas are clearly organized.
4 All of the structural elements are present, and ideas are clearly organized.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
Please see marking notes in markschemes for further support in assessing these questions.
Internal assessment
The internal assessment requirements at SL and at HL are different for the business management course.
The SL internal assessment is a written commentary and the HL internal assessment is a research project.
It is the responsibility of teachers to ensure that all students understand the basic meaning and significance
of concepts that relate to academic honesty, especially authenticity and intellectual property. Teachers
must ensure that all student work for assessment is prepared according to the requirements and must
explain clearly to students that the internally assessed work must be entirely their own. Where collaboration
between students is permitted, it must be clear to all students what the difference is between collaboration
and collusion.
All work submitted to the IB for moderation or assessment must be authenticated by a teacher, and must
not include any known instances of suspected or confirmed malpractice. Each student must confirm that
the work is his or her authentic work and constitutes the final version of that work. Once a student has
officially submitted the final version of the work it cannot be retracted. The requirement to confirm the
authenticity of work applies to the work of all students, not just the sample work that will be submitted to
the IB for the purpose of moderation. For further details refer to the IB publication Academic honesty, The
Diploma Programme: From principles into practice and the relevant articles in the General regulations: Diploma
Programme.
Authenticity may be checked by discussion with the student on the content of the work, and scrutiny of one
or more of the following:
Time allocation
Internal assessment is an integral part of the business management course, contributing 25% to the final
assessment in the SL and the HL courses. This weighting should be reflected in the time that is allocated to
teaching the knowledge, skills and understanding required to undertake the work, as well as the total time
allocated to carry out the work.
It is recommended that a total of approximately 15 hours (SL) and 30 hours (HL) of teaching time should be
allocated to the work. This should include:
time for the teacher to explain to students the requirements of the internal assessment
class time for students to work on the internal assessment component and ask questions
time for consultation between the teacher and each student
time to review and monitor progress, and to check authenticity.
Teachers must judge the internally assessed work at SL and at HL against the criteria using the level descriptors.
When assessing a students work, teachers should read the level descriptors for each criterion until
they reach a descriptor that most appropriately describes the level of the work being assessed. If a
piece of work seems to fall between two descriptors, both descriptors should be read again and the
one that more appropriately describes the students work should be chosen.
Where there are two or more marks available within a level, teachers should award the upper marks
if the students work demonstrates the qualities described to a great extent; the work may be close
to achieving marks in the level above. Teachers should award the lower marks if the students work
demonstrates the qualities described to a lesser extent; the work may be close to achieving marks in
the level below.
Only whole numbers should be recorded; partial marks, (fractions and decimals) are not acceptable.
Teachers should not think in terms of a pass or fail boundary, but should concentrate on identifying
the appropriate descriptor for each assessment criterion.
The highest level descriptors do not imply faultless performance but should be achievable by a
student. Teachers should not hesitate to use the extremes if they are appropriate descriptions of the
work being assessed.
A student who attains a high achievement level in relation to one criterion will not necessarily
attain high achievement levels in relation to the other criteria. Similarly, a student who attains a low
achievement level for one criterion will not necessarily attain low achievement levels for the other
criteria. Teachers should not assume that the overall assessment of the students will produce any
particular distribution of marks.
It is recommended that the assessment criteria be made available to students.
Requirements
SL students are required to:
select a real business issue or problem for their written commentary that must relate to the SL syllabus.
refer directly to a single business organization, but may consider industry-wide issues that impact on
that organization.
base their written commentary on secondary research, selected for its suitability, depth and breadth.
Primary research may be used as support.
provide a title for the commentary that, to give focus and direction, must be framed as a question.
produce a written commentary that does not exceed 1,500 words.
attach to the commentary three to five supporting documents from which the majority of the
information for the commentary has been obtained.
fully reference all supporting documents and additional sources and include them in a bibliography.
The teacher should approve the students questions before work is started, to ensure that they are suitable
for investigation and allow access to all levels of the assessment criteria. It is highly advisable that every
student is supplied with a copy of the assessment criteria.
The teacher should also guide students in the selection of appropriate supporting documents.
Throughout the internal assessment process, students and the teacher should engage in dialogue
supportive of the students work. The teacher should comment on students work plans and first draft of the
commentary as part of the learning process.
If more than one student chooses the same organization for their research, it is the responsibility of the
teacher to ensure that the written commentaries reflect the students own individual research, interpretation
and analysis.
If a student also writes an extended essay in business management, it is the responsibility of the teacher to
ensure that students do not build their internal assessment and extended essay in business management
on the same syllabus content. Also, given different requirements and assessment criteria, students should
choose different organizations for these different tasks.
Can airline X successfully target segment Y? The commentary could then examine business
management topics such as market segmentation, consumer profiling, promotion, and measure of
financial success.
Should company Y outsource its manufacturing? The commentary could then examine areas within
business management such as operations management and human resource management.
Supporting documents
The selection of supporting documents is very important. To achieve the highest levels of each assessment
criterion, it is strongly recommended that the supporting documents present a range of ideas and views.
For example, the selection of three to five documents published by a single company, or three to five
surveys of similar populations, would not provide balance or objectivity.
The supporting documents must be of a contemporary nature and written within a maximum of three years
prior to the submission of the written commentary to the IB. Submission of the written commentary occurs
in April or November of the final year of the course, depending on the examination session of the school.
A maximum of one of the supporting documents may be a transcript of video/audio material. The transcript
must summarize the essential points of the video/audio file used for the purposes of the commentary.
Only video/audio material published by a reliable organization (such as the business organization itself, an
organization commissioned by the business or an NGO) should be used. Particular attention needs to be
paid to referencing the original video/audio file so that this may be traced.
The commentary must be based on secondary sources and may include primary data.
responses to questionnaires (students should include a blank copy of the questionnaire and a tally/
summary of results)
results of surveys
transcripts of interviews and discussions with focus groups.
Students must select their own supporting documents, which must not be provided to the student by the
teacher.
Students must highlight the parts of each supporting document that relate directly to their commentary.
Any highlighted parts of supporting documents that are not in the language for which the student is
registered must be translated.
Students should label each supporting document clearly, such as Supporting document 1, Supporting
document 2 and so on. This will help with referencing in the commentary.
It is expected that students will include in-text citations/references of the supporting documents and a
bibliography, which should be formatted in an appropriate way.
Any additional sources such as textbooks and class notes must be referenced but will not be accepted as
supporting documents.
Written commentary
Although there is no required format for the written commentary, it should nonetheless be a structured
piece of well-presented writing. An introduction that sets the scene, presentation, analysis and discussion
of findings, and a conclusion that answers the commentary question provides an effective structure for
the commentary. Good presentation additionally requires a title page, an accurate table of contents page,
appropriate headings and sub-headings, consistent referencing, a complete bibliography and numbered
pages.
The introduction should briefly demonstrate some background information about the business organization,
to give a clear outline of the issue or problem under investigation and to explain the methodology used to
investigate this issue or problem.
In the body of the commentary, findings from the supporting documents should be presented and
analysed with the help of relevant business tools, techniques and theories. The findings should also be
interpreted: what main themes emerge from the analysis of the supporting documents, and why and how
are they helpful (or not) to answering the commentary question? An evaluative approach to this discussion
of findings should be pursued: for example, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the various positions
on the issue or problem and what are their implications?
In the conclusion, the commentary question should be explicitly answered. The conclusion should not
introduce facts or arguments that have not been discussed in previous sections of the commentary. Rather,
it is good practice to include those aspects of the commentary question that have not been fully answered
in the commentary or that might need further investigation in order to be judged more effectively.
For presentation of references and bibliography, please see the information on acknowledging the ideas
and work of another person in the The Diploma Programme section of this subject guide.
Word count
The written commentary must not exceed 1,500 words. A word count must be included as part of the
commentary. If the word limit is exceeded, the teachers assessment must be based on the first 1,500 words.
Note: Moderators will not read beyond 1,500 words for the commentary.
acknowledgments
contents page
tables of statistical data
diagrams or figures
equations, formulae and calculations
citations (which, if used, must be in the body of the commentary)
references (which, if used, must be in the footnotes/endnotes)
bibliography.
Please note that footnotes/endnotes may be used for references only. Definitions of business management
terms and quotations, if used, must be in the body of the work and are included in the word count. Please
note that citation is a shorthand method of making a reference in the body of the commentary, which is
then linked to the full reference in the bibliography.
When the work to be assessed has been read, the descriptors for each criterion should be studied until a
descriptor is reached that most appropriately describes the achievement level. If a piece of work seems to
fall between two descriptors, both descriptors should be read again and the one that more appropriately
describes the students work chosen.
Criterion E: Evaluation
Criterion F: Structure
Criterion G: Presentation
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There are only one or two, or more than five, supporting documents, or they are of
marginal relevance.
2 The supporting documents are generally relevant but some lack depth, or they were
published more than three years prior to the submission of the IA to the IB, or they are not
all translated in the language of submission.
4 The supporting documents are relevant, sufficiently in-depth and provide a range of
ideas and views.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There is a limited selection of business management tools, techniques and theories, and
these are not applied.
2 There is a limited selection of business management tools, techniques and theories, and
these are superficially applied.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There is a limited selection of data from the supporting documents but no analysis.
2 There is a limited selection of data from the supporting documents with superficial
analysis.
4 There is an appropriate selection of data from the supporting documents with good
analysis and some integration of ideas.
5 There is an appropriate selection of data from the supporting documents with skillful
analysis and a coherent integration of ideas.
Criterion D: Conclusions
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student is able to draw relevant conclusions based on the
analysis of the supporting documents and answer the commentary question.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Conclusions are inconsistent with the evidence presented, or conclusions are superficial.
3 Conclusions are consistent with the evidence presented and explicitly answer the
commentary question.
Criterion E: Evaluation
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student evaluates his or her arguments and makes judgments
that are well substantiated.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
Criterion F: Structure
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student organizes his or her ideas into a structured
commentary with an argument that is easy to follow.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Limited structure.
2 Appropriate structure.
Criterion G: Presentation
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student presents the written commentary well. This involves
a title page, an accurate table of contents, appropriate headings and sub-headings, consistent referencing, a
complete bibliography and numbered pages.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
Requirements
HL students are required to:
design and undertake research that either addresses an issue facing a business organization or a
range of organizations or analyses a decision to be made by a business organization or range of
organizations
select a real business organization or a range of organizations and a real issue or decision under
investigation
base their research project on primary research they gather from the organization investigated
(secondary research may be used as support)
provide a title for the research project that, to give focus and direction, must be framed as a question
produce a research proposal (of maximum 500 words), including an action plan, to be used as the
primary planning document
The teacher should approve each topic before work is started, and ensure that it complies with the
requirements for internal assessment.
The research question should be forward-looking, targeted at an issue or a decision still relevant for
the business organization(s) rather than descriptive of something already finished, and should require
the student to make recommendations for further action. Guidance from the teacher in formulating an
appropriate research question is important.
For a variety of reasons not apparent at the start of the project, such as confidentiality, some organizations
fail to provide data, which will undermine the quality of the final report. Students must therefore confirm
before starting their investigations that they will be able to obtain the necessary data from the chosen
organization.
Students must be aware of ethical considerations when undertaking any research. There is a need for tact,
sensitivity to other people and respect for confidentiality.
If more than one student chooses the same organization for their research, it is the responsibility of the
teacher to ensure that the written commentaries reflect the students own individual research, interpretation
and analysis.
If a student also writes an extended essay in business management, it is the responsibility of the teachers to
ensure that students do not build their internal assessment and extended essay in business management
on the same syllabus content. Also, given different requirements and assessment criteria, students should
choose different organizations for these different tasks.
Research proposal
The internal assessment must start with a research proposal. This will become the primary planning
document, giving direction to the research project. The maximum length of the research proposal is 500
words. The word count must be stated on the submitted work. If the word limit is exceeded, the teachers
assessment must be based on the first 500 words of the proposal.
Note: Moderators will not read beyond 500 words for the research proposal.
Research question
Proposed methodology, including:
the rationale for study
areas of the syllabus to be covered
possible sources of information
organizations and individuals to be approached
methods to be used to collect and analyse data, and the reason for choosing them
the order of activities and timescale of the project
The maximum achievement level for criterion A, research proposal, is 3 marks (see Internal assessment
criteriaHL). Students who fail to produce a research proposal will be awarded 0 marks for this criterion.
Written report
The written report, which follows the research proposal, is the second part of the research project. This will
document the main findings of the research.
The report must follow acceptable practice in report presentation, reflected in the required format for the
written report shown below.
Title page: The title page should give a clear indication of the content of the research project, including
the name of the student, the title of the project, the intended audience and the word count.
Acknowledgements: The acknowledgements should recognize any individual and/or organization
that made the production of the report possible.
Contents page: The contents page should include the major headings in the report, beginning with
the executive summary. Page numbers should be clearly indicated.
Executive summary (abstract): The executive summary should be a concise, clear and explicit
summary of the document, including the recommendations and conclusions. The research question
and executive summary should guide the reader to the substance of the report. The maximum length
of the executive summary is 200 words, and this is not included in the word count.
Introduction: The introduction should demonstrate some background knowledge about the
organization(s) and give a clear outline of the issue or decision under investigation.
Research question
Methodology employed: The methodology section should be a summary of the primary (and, where
relevant, secondary) research undertaken and the business tools, techniques and theories applied.
It should also include an assessment of the validity and reliability of the data collected (for example,
partiality and scope) and the methods employed. Any changes made as the work progressed should
be explained.
Main results and findings: The main results and findings section should clarify what the raw data has
revealed. This should include a summary of the data collected and of the findings made, and should,
where appropriate, be supported by tables, graphs and statistics.
Analysis and discussion: In the analysis and discussion section, the results and findings should be
analysed with the help of relevant business tools, techniques and theories. They should also be
interpreted: what main issues emerge from the research, and why and how are they helpful (or not)
to answering the research question? An evaluative approach to the discussion of findings should be
pursued: for example, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the various positions on the issue or
decision under investigation and what are their implications?
Conclusion(s) and recommendation(s): The conclusions should follow on from the analysis and
discussion; new facts or arguments should not be presented. Recommendations should be precise,
answer the research question and be practical proposals for action that stem from the conclusions.
If the results of the research are inconclusive, further research should be recommended. To be of
practical value to management, the report should be forward-looking and support the organizations
decision-making process.
References and bibliography: For presentation of references and bibliography, please see the section
on acknowledging the ideas and work of another person in the The Diploma Programme section of
this subject guide.
Appendices: The appendices should contain only information or data that is required to support of the
text and should be clearly referred to where relevant. The appendices will typically include examples
of photographs, documents, questionnaires, numerical raw data in tables and statistical calculations.
The teacher should comment on students first drafts of the written report as part of the learning process.
Word count
The written report must not exceed 2,000 words. A word count must be included as part of the written
report. If the word limit is exceeded, the teachers assessment must be based on the first 2,000 words of the
report.
Note: Moderators will not read beyond 2,000 words for the written report.
title page
acknowledgments
contents page
executive summary (abstract)
tables of statistical data
diagrams or figures
equations, formulae and calculations
citations (which, if used, must be in the body of the commentary)
references (which, if used, must be in the footnotes/endnotes)
bibliography
appendices.
Please note that footnotes/endnotes may be used for references only. Definitions of business management
terms and quotations, if used, must be in the body of the work and are included in the word count. Please
note that citation is a shorthand method of making a reference in the body of the commentary, which is
then linked to the full reference in the bibliography.
When the work to be assessed has been read, the descriptors for each criterion should be studied until a
descriptor is reached that most appropriately describes the achievement level. If a piece of work seems to
fall between two descriptors, both descriptors should be read again and the one that more appropriately
describes the students work chosen.
Please note: Criterion A should be used to assess the research proposal only.
This criterion assesses the extent to which the student presents a research proposal that gives an effective
direction for the project, with all the required elements.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
2 The research proposal is generally appropriate but some elements lack clarity, detail and
focus, or one element is missing.
3 The research proposal with all the required elements is appropriate, detailed, clear and
focused.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Some of the primary sources selected or the data collected are appropriate.
2 The primary sources selected and the data collected are appropriate, but are not varied
and sufficient.
3 The primary sources selected and the data collected are appropriate, varied and
sufficient.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 The results and findings are limited, and no analysis of them is provided.
2 The results and findings are limited, and a superficial analysis of them is provided.
3 There is a satisfactory analysis of the results and findings and some integration of ideas.
5 There is a good analysis of the results and findings, a good integration of ideas and
evidence of substantiated evaluation.
6 There is a skillful analysis of the results and findings, a coherent integration of ideas and
consistent evidence of substantiated evaluation.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There are some conclusions, but they are unsubstantiated and/or inconsistent with the
evidence presented in the main body of the report.
2 Conclusions are substantiated and consistent with the evidence presented in the main
body of the report. Areas for further study have been identified, if appropriate.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There are recommendations, but they are unsubstantiated and/or inconsistent with the
conclusions, or they do not answer the research question.
2 The recommendations are substantiated and consistent with the conclusions, and they
answer the research question.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Limited structure.
2 Appropriate structure.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 The report is missing one or more of the required components, or the components are
not in the correct order or format.
2 The report includes all of the required components in the correct order and format.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 The report includes limited or superficial reflective thinking on the approach taken in this
piece of research and its limitations.
2 The report includes appropriate evidence of reflective thinking on the approach taken in
this piece of research and its limitations.
Formulae
The following formulae will be used in business management external assessment. A copy of the formulae
will be provided to students for the examination.
=
where capital employed loan capital (or long-term liabilities) + share capital + retained profit
or
average stock
Stock turnover =
(number of days) 365
cost of goods sold
debtors
Debtor days ratio=
(number of days) 365
total sales revenue
creditors
Creditor days ratio =
(number of days) 365
cost of goods sold
loan capital
=
Gearing ratio 100
capital employed
=
where capital employed loan capital (or long-term liabilities) + share capital + retained profit
HL only
=
Net present value (NPV) present values of return original cost
total output
=
Productivity rate 100
total input
4% 6% 8% 10% 20%
ABC Ltd
$m $m
Fixed assets
Accumulated depreciation 20
Current assets
Cash 10
Debtors 12
Stock 35
Current liabilities
Overdraft 5
Creditors 15
Financed by:
Equity 195
ABC Ltd
Profit and loss account for ABC Ltd for the year
ended 31 May 20**
$m
Expenses 200
Interest 10
Tax 25
Dividends 35
Retained profit 80
Students should be familiar with the following key terms and phrases used in syllabus content and in
examination questions, which are to be understood as described below. Although these terms will be used
frequently in examination questions, other terms may be used to direct students to present an argument in
a specific way.
Analyse AO2 Break down in order to bring Analyse the impact of external
out the essential elements or opportunities and threats
structure. on the business strategy of
company A.
Annotate AO4 Add brief notes to a diagram Copy and annotate the
or graph. product life cycle.
Calculate AO4 Obtain a numerical answer Calculate the acid test ratio for
showing the relevant stages company X in 2013.
in the working.
Complete AO4 Add missing information/ Copy and complete the profit
data. and loss account provided
below.
Define AO1 Give the precise meaning of Define the term economies of
a word, phrase, concept or scale.
physical quantity.
Identify AO4 Provide an answer from a Identify two reasons why the
number of possibilities. owner has chosen a particular
method of investment
appraisal.
Plot AO4 Mark the position of points Plot the position of company
on a diagram. X on the position map drawn
in your answer to part (b).