Groundwater Contamination
Groundwater Contamination
Groundwater contaminants come from two categories of sources: point sources and
distributed, or non-point sources. Landfills, leaking gasoline storage tanks, leaking septic
tanks, and accidental spills are examples of point sources. Infiltration from farm land
treated with pesticides and fertilizers is an example of a non-point source.
Among the more significant point sources are municipal landfills and industrial waste
disposal sites. When either of these occur in or near sand and gravel aquifers, the potential
for widespread contamination is the greatest.
Other point sources are individually less significant, but they occur in large numbers all
across the country. Some of these dangerous and widespread sources of contamination
are septic tanks, leaks and spills of petroleum products and of dense industrial organic
liquids.
Septic systems are designed so that some of the sewage is degraded in the tank and some
is degraded and absorbed by the surrounding sand and subsoil. Contaminants that may
enter groundwater from septic systems include bacteria, viruses, detergents, and
household cleaners. These can create serious contamination problems. Despite the fact
that septic tanks and cesspools are known sources of contaminants, they are poorly
monitored and very little studied.
Contamination can render groundwater unsuitable for use. Although the overall extent of
the problem across Canada is unknown, many individual cases of contamination have
been investigated such as Ville Mercier in Quebec; the highway de-icing salt problem in
Nova Scotia; industrial effluents in Elmira, Ontario; various pesticides in the Prairie
provinces; industrial contamination in Vancouver, British Columbia; and so on. In many
cases, contamination is recognized only after groundwater users have been exposed to
potential health risks. The cost of cleaning up contaminated water supplies is usually
extremely high.
Contamination problems are increasing in Canada primarily because of the large and
growing number of toxic compounds used in industry and agriculture. In rural Canada,
scientists suspect that many household wells are contaminated by substances from such
common sources as septic systems, underground tanks, used motor oil, road salt,
fertilizer, pesticides, and livestock wastes. Scientists also predict that in the next few
decades more contaminated aquifers will be discovered, new contaminants will be
identified, and more contaminated groundwater will be discharged into wetlands, streams
and lakes.
Once an aquifer is contaminated, it may be unusable for decades. The residence time, as
noted earlier, can be anywhere from two weeks or 10 000 years.
Furthermore, the effects of groundwater contamination do not end with the loss of well-
water supplies. Several studies have documented the migration of contaminants from
disposal or spill sites to nearby lakes and rivers as this groundwater passes through the
hydrologic cycle, but the processes are not as yet well understood. In Canada, pollution
of surface water by groundwater is probably at least as serious as the contamination of
groundwater supplies. Preventing contamination in the first place is by far the most
practical solution to the problem. This can be accomplished by the adoption of effective
groundwater management practices by governments, industries and all Canadians.
Although progress is being made in this direction, efforts are hampered by a serious
shortage of groundwater experts and a general lack of knowledge about how groundwater
behaves.
Below are some of the many point- and non-point sources of groundwater pollution, as
well as more detailed explanations of four of these contaminants: septic disposal systems,
saltwater intrusion, leaking underground storage tanks and DNAPLs.
Point sources
On-site septic systems
Leaky tanks or pipelines containing petroleum products
Leaks or spills of industrial chemicals at manufacturing facilities
Underground injection wells (industrial waste)
Municipal landfills
Livestock wastes
Leaky sewer lines
Chemicals used at wood preservation facilities
Mill tailings in mining areas
Fly ash from coal-fired power plants
Sludge disposal areas at petroleum refineries
Land spreading of sewage or sewage sludge
Graveyards
Road salt storage areas
Wells for disposal of liquid wastes
Runoff of salt and other chemicals from roads and highways
Spills related to highway or railway accidents
Coal tar at old coal gasification sites
Asphalt production and equipment cleaning sites
Septic treatment systems associated with these developments can stress the environment
in a number of other ways. They are often allowed in less than satisfactory soil conditions
and are seldom maintained properly. They are also unable to treat many household
cleaners and chemicals which, when flushed down the drain or toilet, often impair or kill
the bacterium needed to make the system work (The same applies in urban systems). The
end results are improper treatment of wastewater -- if not outright failure of the system -
- and the contamination of adjacent wells with septic effluent containing bacterium,
nitrates and other pollutants.
Saltwater intrusion
Saltwater intrusion can be a problem in coastal areas where rates of groundwater pumping
are high enough to cause sea water to invade freshwater aquifers. The problem can be
avoided by appropriate well field design and by drilling relief wells to keep the salt water
away from the fresh groundwater source. Some wells pumping saltwater in Prince
Edward Island, are used as convenient water supplies for shellfish farms.
Groundwater dissolves many different compounds, and most of these substances have the
potential to contaminate large quantities of water. For example, one litre of gasoline can
contaminate 1 000 000 litres of groundwater. This problem is particularly severe in the
Atlantic provinces where there is a high usage of groundwater. In many cases, the
problem is noticed long after the aquifer is contaminated, for example, when consumers
start tasting or smelling gasoline.
Groundwater moves so slowly that problems take a long time to appear. Because of this,
and because it is so expensive to clean up a contaminated aquifer (if it can be done at all),
it is preferable by far to prevent contamination from happening in the first place. For
example, leaking underground storage tanks can be replaced by tanks that will not
corrode; landfills can be sited in locations where leachates will not contaminate
underlying groundwater; and the impacts of spills of hazardous materials reduced by
restricting access to recharge areas.
Once these contaminants are in the groundwater, they eventually reach rivers and lakes.
In other words, once we have a pollution problem, we may be only a step away from a
water supply problem.
All levels of government in Canada are starting to take some of the actions necessary to
protect our groundwater supplies, but there is a long way to go before these measures are
fully effective. At the same time, universities and government research institutes are
investigating what happens to water underground and what can be done to preserve it and
even improve its availability to us. Both as a society and as individuals, we must keep in
mind groundwater's susceptibility to contamination.