Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

Markedness Differential Hypothesis

The Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH) proposes that the areas of difficulty for second language learners can be predicted by comparing the grammars of the native language, the target language, and the markedness relations in universal grammar. Markedness refers to the relative complexity of linguistic structures, with unmarked structures being less complex and more frequent than marked structures. According to the MDH, structures that are marked in the native language but unmarked in the target language will be easier to acquire than structures that are unmarked in the native language but marked in the target language.

Uploaded by

ustad73
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

Markedness Differential Hypothesis

The Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH) proposes that the areas of difficulty for second language learners can be predicted by comparing the grammars of the native language, the target language, and the markedness relations in universal grammar. Markedness refers to the relative complexity of linguistic structures, with unmarked structures being less complex and more frequent than marked structures. According to the MDH, structures that are marked in the native language but unmarked in the target language will be easier to acquire than structures that are unmarked in the native language but marked in the target language.

Uploaded by

ustad73
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH)

After the advent of generative linguistic theory in the 1960s and its subsequent
expansion into

areas such as second language acquisition (e.g. White 1982), the concept was
incorporated into

the field with convincing predictive and explanatory powers in the form of
Eckmans (1977)

Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH): The areas of difficulty that a


language learner will

have can be predicted on the basis of a systematic comparison of the grammars


of the native

language, the target language and the markedness relations stated in universal
grammar.

Since then, the notion of markedness has been extensively used as a tool to
explain L2

acquisition phenomena (Yava 2006, Yava and Barlow 2006, Cardoso 2007).
More recently,

there has been a major shift in linguistics with the emergence of usage-based
approaches that

support the notion that linguistic representation (i.e., competence, in generative


terms) is

mediated by the frequency with which certain linguistic structures occur in the
language (Gass

1997, Bybee 2001, Demuth 2001).

An Important Concept

Markedness is one of the most widely, and wildly, used terms in linguistics, and
its senses range

from a very narrow, structure-based notion of relative complexity to an


extremely open sense of

unusual or unnaturalness.

A recent definition of markedness located somewhere in the middle of the


notional continuum is

put forward by Givn (1995), who writes that three main criteria can be used to
distinguish the
marked from the unmarked category in a binary grammatical contrast: first one
being structural

complexity (the marked structure tends to be more complex than the


corresponding unmarked

one), frequency distribution (the marked category tends to be less frequent,


thus cognitively

more salient, than the corresponding unmarked category), cognitive complexity


(the marked

category tends to be cognitively more complexin terms of mental effort,


attention demands or

processing timethan the unmarked one) (Givn ,1995). For instance, (Givn,
1991) claims

that passive structures are more difficult to process than active structures.

According to Chomsky (1981), the theory of markedness imposes a preference


structure on the

parameters of UG (Universal Grammar). In the absence of evidence to the


contrary, unmarked

options are selected. In other words, the unmarked case of any parameter
represents the initial

hypothesis that children make about the language to be acquired (Kean 1992;
Haider 1993). In

Chomsky & Halle (1968), the idea was proposed that markedness values are not
just present in

language particular mental grammars, but are in some way defined at the
level of the innate

cognitive code for language (Universal Grammar or UG).

You might also like