Complaint Theodore Parisienne v. Beasley Media Corp.

Case 1:17-cv-02407-JFK Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
THEODORE PARISIENNE,
Plaintiff, Docket No. ________________
- against - JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
BEASLEY MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Theodore Parisienne (Parisienne or Plaintiff) by and through his
undersigned counsel, as and for his Complaint against Defendant Beasley Media Group, Inc.,
(Beasley or Defendant) hereby alleges as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action for copyright infringement under Section 501 of the Copyright
Act and for the removal and/or alteration of copyright management information under Section
1202(b) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. This action arises out of Defendants
unauthorized reproduction and public display of an injured man who was struck by the subway
after robbing a 13-year-old of his IPhone, owned and registered by Parisienne, a New York
based photojournalist. Accordingly, Parisienne seeks monetary relief under the Copyright Act of
the United States, as amended, 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This claim arises under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq., and this Court
has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).

3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant resides in
and/or are doing business in New York.
4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b).
PARTIES
5. Parisienne is a professional photojournalist in the business of licensing his
photographs to online, print, and television stations for a fee, having a usual place of business at
159 Martin Luther King Jr. Place, 2nd Floor, Brooklyn, New York 11206. Parisiennes work has
appeared in many publications around the country.
6. Upon information and belief, Beasley is a corporation duly organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a place of business at 3033 Riviera Drive, Naples,
Florida 34103. At all times material hereto, Beasley has owned and operated the websites at the
URLs: www.v1019.com, www.power98fm.com, www.995qyk.com, and www.wild941.com
(the Websites).
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Background and Plaintiffs Ownership of the Photograph
7. Parisienne photographed a man being lifted up into an ambulance after being
struck by a train after stealing a teenagers Iphone (the Photograph). A true and correct copy of
the Photograph is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
8. Parisienne then licensed the Photograph to the New York Daily News. On April
5, 2016, the Daily News ran an article that featured the Photograph on its web edition entitled,
Man struck by train in Queens after running onto tracks. See http://www.nydailynews.com/new-
york/queens/man-struck-subway-train-queens-rush-hour-article-1.2588933. Parisiennes name


was featured in a gutter credit identifying him as the photographer of the Photograph. A true and
correct copy of the Photograph in the article is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
9. Parisienne is the author of the Photograph and has at all times been the sole owner
of all right, title and interest in and to the Photograph, including the copyright thereto.
10. The Photograph is registered with the United States Copyright Office and given
registration number VA 2-023-503.
B. Defendants Infringing Activities
11. Upon information and belief, Beasley ran four different articles on the Websites
entitled Thief Struck By a Train Right After Stealing a Teens iphone. See
http://v1019.com/2016/04/06/thief-struck-by-a-train-right-after-stealing-a-teens-iphone/,
http://power98fm.com/2016/04/06/thief-struck-by-a-train-right-after-stealing-a-teens-iphone/,
http://995qyk.com/2016/04/06/thief-struck-by-a-train-right-after-stealing-a-teens-iphone/,
http://wild941.com/2016/04/06/thief-struck-by-a-train-right-after-stealing-a-teens-iphone/. The
articles prominently featured the Photograph. A true and correct copy of the articles are attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
12. Beasley did not license the Photograph from Plaintiff for its articles, nor did
Beasley have Plaintiffs permission or consent to publish the Photograph on its Websites.
13. Upon information and belief, Beasley removed Parisiennes gutter credit on all
the Websites.
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AGAINST BEASLEY)
(17 U.S.C. 106, 501)

14. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in
Paragraphs 1-13 above.
15. Beasley infringed Plaintiffs copyright in the Photograph by reproducing and
publicly displaying the Photograph on the Websites. Beasley is not, and has never been, licensed
or otherwise authorized to reproduce, publically display, distribute and/or use the Photograph.
16. The acts of Defendant complained of herein constitute infringement of Plaintiffs
copyright and exclusive rights under copyright in violation of Sections 106 and 501 of the
Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 106 and 501.
17. Upon information and belief, the foregoing acts of infringement by Beasley have
been willful, intentional, and purposeful, in disregard of and indifference to Plaintiffs rights.
18. As a direct and proximate cause of the infringement by the Defendant of
Plaintiffs copyright and exclusive rights under copyright, Plaintiff is entitled to damages and
Defendants profits pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(b) for the infringement.
19. Defendants conduct, described above, is causing, and unless enjoined and
restrained by this Court, will continue to cause Plaintiff irreparable injury that cannot be fully
compensated by or measured in money damages. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

INTEGRITY OF COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AGAINST
BEASLEY
(17 U.S.C. 1202)
20. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in
Paragraphs 1-19 above.
21. When the Photograph was published in an article in New York Daily News, the
article contained copyright management information protected under 17 U.S.C. 1202(b).


22. Upon information and belief, Defendant copied the Photograph from the New
York Daily News article which contained copyright management information, and pasted the
Photograph onto the Websites without the copyright management information.
23. Upon information and belief, Beasley intentionally and knowingly removed
copyright management information identifying Plaintiff as the photographer of the Photograph.
24. The conduct of Beasley violates 17 U.S.C. 1202(b).
25. Upon information and belief, Beasleys falsification, removal and/or alteration of
the aforementioned copyright management information was made without the knowledge or
consent of Plaintiff.
26. Upon information and belief, the falsification, alteration and/or removal of said
copyright management information was made by Beasley intentionally, knowingly and with the
intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal their infringement of Plaintiffs copyrights in the
Photograph. Beasley also knew, or should have known, that such falsification, alteration and/or
removal of said copyright management information would induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal
their infringement of Plaintiffs copyrights in the Photograph.
27. As a result of the wrongful conduct of Beasley as alleged herein, Plaintiff is
entitled to recover from Beasley the damages, that he sustained and will sustain, and any gains,
profits and advantages obtained by Beasley because of their violations of 17 U.S.C. 1202,
including attorneys fees and costs.
28. Alternatively, Plaintiff may elect to recover from Beasley statutory damages
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1203(c) (3) in a sum of at least $2,500 up to $25,000 for each violation
of 17 U.S.C. 1202.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF


WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests judgment as follows:
1. That Defendant Beasley be adjudged to have infringed upon Plaintiffs copyrights
in the Photograph in violation of 17 U.S.C 106 and 501;
2. The Defendant Beasley be adjudged to have falsified, removed and/or altered
copyright management information in violation of 17 U.S.C. 1202.
3. Plaintiff be awarded Plaintiffs actual damages and Defendants profits, gains or
advantages of any kind attributable to Defendants infringement of Plaintiffs
Photographs.
4. That, with regard to the Second Claim for Relief, Plaintiff be awarded either:
a) Plaintiffs actual damages and Defendants profits, gains or advantages of any
kind attributable to Defendants falsification, removal and/or alteration of
copyright management information; or b) alternatively, statutory damages of at
least $2,500 and up to $ 25,000 for each instance of false copyright management
information and/or removal or alteration of copyright management information
committed by Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1203(c);
5. That Defendant be required to account for all profits, income, receipts, or other
benefits derived by Defendant as a result of its unlawful conduct;
6. That Plaintiff be awarded his costs, expenses and attorneys fees pursuant to
17 U.S.C. 1203 (b);
7. That Plaintiff be awarded pre-judgment interest; and
8. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL


Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable in accordance with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b).
Dated: Valley Stream, New York

April 3, 2017
LIEBOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC
By: /s/Richard Liebowitz
Richard P. Liebowitz
11 Sunrise Plaza, Suite 305
Valley Stream, NY 11580
Tel: (516) 233-1660
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Theordore Parisienne

Complaint Theodore Parisienne v. Beasley Media Corp.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Complaint Theodore Parisienne v. Beasley Media Corp.

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Complaint Theodore Parisienne v. Beasley Media Corp.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 1:17-cv-02407-JFK Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff, Docket No. ________________

- against - JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BEASLEY MEDIA GROUP, INC.

Plaintiff Theodore Parisienne (Parisienne or Plaintiff) by and through his

(Beasley or Defendant) hereby alleges as follows:

NATURE OF THE ACTION

the United States, as amended, 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

and/or are doing business in New York.

4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b).

5. Parisienne is a professional photojournalist in the business of licensing his

appeared in many publications around the country.

URLs: www.v1019.com, www.power98fm.com, www.995qyk.com, and www.wild941.com

A. Background and Plaintiffs Ownership of the Photograph

7. Parisienne photographed a man being lifted up into an ambulance after being

the Photograph is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

york/queens/man-struck-subway-train-queens-rush-hour-article-1.2588933. Parisiennes name

correct copy of the Photograph in the article is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

registration number VA 2-023-503.

B. Defendants Infringing Activities

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Paragraphs 1-13 above.

15. Beasley infringed Plaintiffs copyright in the Photograph by reproducing and

16. The acts of Defendant complained of herein constitute infringement of Plaintiffs

Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 106 and 501.

18. As a direct and proximate cause of the infringement by the Defendant of

Defendants profits pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(b) for the infringement.

compensated by or measured in money damages. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

20. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in

Paragraphs 1-19 above.

article contained copyright management information protected under 17 U.S.C. 1202(b).

Photograph onto the Websites without the copyright management information.

copyright management information identifying Plaintiff as the photographer of the Photograph.

24. The conduct of Beasley violates 17 U.S.C. 1202(b).

their infringement of Plaintiffs copyrights in the Photograph.

27. As a result of the wrongful conduct of Beasley as alleged herein, Plaintiff is

including attorneys fees and costs.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

1. That Defendant Beasley be adjudged to have infringed upon Plaintiffs copyrights

in the Photograph in violation of 17 U.S.C 106 and 501;

2. The Defendant Beasley be adjudged to have falsified, removed and/or altered

copyright management information in violation of 17 U.S.C. 1202.

3. Plaintiff be awarded Plaintiffs actual damages and Defendants profits, gains or

advantages of any kind attributable to Defendants infringement of Plaintiffs

a) Plaintiffs actual damages and Defendants profits, gains or advantages of any

kind attributable to Defendants falsification, removal and/or alteration of

copyright management information; or b) alternatively, statutory damages of at

information and/or removal or alteration of copyright management information

committed by Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1203(c);

benefits derived by Defendant as a result of its unlawful conduct;

17 U.S.C. 1203 (b);

7. That Plaintiff be awarded pre-judgment interest; and

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b).

Dated: Valley Stream, New York

Attorneys for Plaintiff Theordore Parisienne