100% found this document useful (1 vote)
284 views

WWW Personal Kent Edu Rmuhamma Algorithms MyAlgorithms Sort

Merge sort is a divide and conquer algorithm that works by recursively splitting an array into two halves, sorting each half, and then merging the two sorted halves back together. It has a worst case running time of Θ(n log n), which is faster than insertion sort's Θ(n2) worst case time for large inputs. The algorithm involves recursively dividing the array into subarrays of size 1, sorting each subarray, and then merging the sorted subarrays back together.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
284 views

WWW Personal Kent Edu Rmuhamma Algorithms MyAlgorithms Sort

Merge sort is a divide and conquer algorithm that works by recursively splitting an array into two halves, sorting each half, and then merging the two sorted halves back together. It has a worst case running time of Θ(n log n), which is faster than insertion sort's Θ(n2) worst case time for large inputs. The algorithm involves recursively dividing the array into subarrays of size 1, sorting each subarray, and then merging the sorted subarrays back together.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Merge Sort

Merge sort is based on the divide-and-conquer paradigm. Its worst-case running time has a
lower order of growth than insertion sort. Since we are dealing with subproblems, we state each
subproblem as sorting a subarray A[p .. r]. Initially, p = 1 and r = n, but these values change as we
recurse through subproblems.

To sort A[p .. r]:

1. Divide Step

If a given array A has zero or one element, simply return; it is already sorted. Otherwise,
split A[p .. r] into two subarrays A[p .. q] and A[q + 1 .. r], each containing about half of the
elements of A[p .. r]. That is, q is the halfway point of A[p .. r].

2. Conquer Step

Conquer by recursively sorting the two subarrays A[p .. q] and A[q + 1 .. r].

3. Combine Step

Combine the elements back in A[p .. r] by merging the two sorted subarrays A[p .. q] and
A[q + 1 .. r] into a sorted sequence. To accomplish this step, we will define a procedure
MERGE (A, p, q, r).
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
MERGE (A, p, q, r).

Note that the recursion bottoms out when the subarray has just one element, so that it is trivially
sorted.

Algorithm: Merge Sort


To sort the entire sequence A[1 .. n], make the initial call to the procedure MERGE-SORT (A, 1, n).

MERGE-SORT (A, p, r)

1. IF p < r // Check for base case


2. THEN q = FLOOR[(p + r)/2] // Divide step
3. MERGE (A, p, q) // Conquer step.
4. MERGE (A, q + 1, r) // Conquer step.
5. MERGE (A, p, q, r) // Conquer step.

Example: Bottom-up view of the above procedure for n = 8.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Merging
What remains is the MERGE procedure. The following is the input and output of the MERGE
procedure.

INPUT: Array A and indices p, q, r such that p q r and subarray A[p .. q] is sorted and
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
subarray A[q + 1 .. r] is sorted. By restrictions on p, q, r, neither subarray is empty.

OUTPUT: The two subarrays are merged into a single sorted subarray in A[p .. r].

We implement it so that it takes (n) time, where n = r p + 1, which is the number of elements
being merged.

Idea Behind Linear Time Merging


Think of two piles of cards, Each pile is sorted and placed face-up on a table with the smallest cards
on top. We will merge these into a single sorted pile, face-down on the table.

A basic step:

Choose the smaller of the two top cards.

Remove it from its pile, thereby exposing a new top card.

Place the chosen card face-down onto the output pile.

Repeatedly perform basic steps until one input pile is empty.

Once one input pile empties, just take the remaining input pile and place it face-down onto the
output pile.

Each basic step should take constant time, since we check just the two top cards. There are at most
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
n basic steps, since each basic step removes one card from the input piles, and we started with n
cards in the input piles. Therefore, this procedure should take (n) time.

Now the question is do we actually need to check whether a pile is empty before each basic step?
The answer is no, we do not. Put on the bottom of each input pile a special sentinel card. It
contains a special value that we use to simplify the code. We use , since that's guaranteed to lose
to any other value. The only way that cannot lose is when both piles have exposed as their top
cards. But when that happens, all the nonsentinel cards have already been placed into the output
pile. We know in advance that there are exactly r p + 1 nonsentinel cards so stop once we have
performed r p + 1 basic steps. Never a need to check for sentinels, since they will always lose.
Rather than even counting basic steps, just fill up the output array from index p up through and
including index r .

The pseudocode of the MERGE procedure is as follow:

MERGE (A, p, q, r )

1. n1 q p + 1
2. n2 r q
3. Create arrays L[1 . . n1 + 1] and R[1 . . n2 + 1]
4. FOR i 1 TO n1
5. DO L[i] A[p + i 1]
6. FOR j 1 TO n2
7. DO R[j] A[q + j ]
8. L[n1 + 1]
9. R[n2 + 1]
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
10. i1
11. j1
12. FOR k p TO r
13. DO IF L[i ] R[ j]
14. THEN A[k] L[i]
15. ii+1
16. ELSE A[k] R[j]
17. jj+1

Example [from CLRS-Figure 2.3]: A call of MERGE(A, 9, 12, 16). Read the following figure row
by row. That is how we have done in the class.

The first part shows the arrays at the start of the "for k p to r" loop, where A[p . . q] is copied
into L[1 . . n1] and A[q + 1 . . r ] is
copied into R[1 . . n2].

Succeeding parts show the situation at the start of successive iterations.

Entries in A with slashes have had their values copied to either L or R and have not had a
value copied back in yet. Entries in L and R with slashes have been copied back into A.

The last part shows that the subarrays are merged back into A[p . . r], which is now sorted, and
that only the sentinels () are exposed in the arrays L and R.]

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Running Time
The first two for loops (that is, the loop in line 4 and the loop in line 6) take (n1 + n2) = (n) time.
The last for loop (that is, the loop in line 12) makes n iterations, each taking constant time, for (n)
time. Therefore, the total running time is (n).

Analyzing Merge Sort


open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
For simplicity, assume that n is a power of 2 so that each divide step yields two subproblems, both of
size exactly n/2.

The base case occurs when n = 1.

When n 2, time for merge sort steps:

Divide: Just compute q as the average of p and r, which takes constant time i.e. (1).

Conquer: Recursively solve 2 subproblems, each of size n/2, which is 2T(n/2).

Combine: MERGE on an n-element subarray takes (n) time.

Summed together they give a function that is linear in n, which is (n). Therefore, the recurrence for
merge sort running time is

Solving the Merge Sort Recurrence


By the master theorem in CLRS-Chapter 4 (page 73), we can show that this recurrence has the
solution

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
T(n) = (n lg n).

Reminder: lg n stands for log2 n.

Compared to insertion sort [(n2) worst-case time], merge sort is faster. Trading a factor of n for a
factor of lg n is a good deal. On small inputs, insertion sort may be faster. But for large enough
inputs, merge sort will always be faster, because its running time grows more slowly than insertion
sorts.

Recursion Tree
We can understand how to solve the merge-sort recurrence without the master theorem. There is a
drawing of recursion tree on page 35 in CLRS, which shows successive expansions of the
recurrence.

The following figure (Figure 2.5b in CLRS) shows that for the original problem, we have a cost of cn,
plus the two subproblems, each costing T (n/2).

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
The following figure (Figure 2.5c in CLRS) shows that for each of the size-n/2 subproblems, we have
a cost of cn/2, plus two subproblems, each costing T (n/4).

The following figure (Figure: 2.5d in CLRS) tells to continue expanding until the problem sizes get
down to 1.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
In the above recursion tree, each level has cost cn.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
The top level has cost cn.

The next level down has 2 subproblems, each contributing cost cn/2.

The next level has 4 subproblems, each contributing cost cn/4.

Each time we go down one level, the number of subproblems doubles but the cost per
subproblem halves. Therefore, cost per level stays the same.

The height of this recursion tree is lg n and there are lg n + 1 levels.

Mathematical Induction
We use induction on the size of a given subproblem n.

Base case: n = 1

Implies that there is 1 level, and lg 1 + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1.

Inductive Step

Our inductive hypothesis is that a tree for a problem size of 2i has lg 2i + 1 = i +1 levels.
Because we assume that the problem size is a power of 2, the next problem size up after
2i is 2i + 1. A tree for a problem size of 2i + 1 has one more level than the size-2i tree
implying i + 2 levels. Since lg 2i + 1 = i + 2, we are done with the inductive argument.
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Total cost is sum of costs at each level of the tree. Since we have lg n +1 levels, each costing cn,
the total cost is

cn lg n + cn.

Ignore low-order term of cn and constant coefcient c, and we have,

(n lg n)
which is the desired result.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Implementation
void mergeSort(int numbers[], int temp[], int array_size)
{
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
m_sort(numbers, temp, 0, array_size - 1);

void m_sort(int numbers[], int temp[], int left, int right)

{
int mid;

if (right > left)

mid = (right + left) / 2;

m_sort(numbers, temp, left, mid);

m_sort(numbers, temp, mid+1, right);

merge(numbers, temp, left, mid+1, right);

}
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
void merge(int numbers[], int temp[], int left, int mid, int right)

int i, left_end, num_elements, tmp_pos;

left_end = mid - 1;

tmp_pos = left;

num_elements = right - left + 1;

while ((left <= left_end) && (mid <= right))

if (numbers[left] <= numbers[mid])

temp[tmp_pos] = numbers[left];
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
tmp_pos = tmp_pos + 1;

left = left +1;

else

temp[tmp_pos] = numbers[mid];

tmp_pos = tmp_pos + 1;

mid = mid + 1;

while (left <= left_end)

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
temp[tmp_pos] = numbers[left];

left = left + 1;

tmp_pos = tmp_pos + 1;

while (mid <= right)

temp[tmp_pos] = numbers[mid];

mid = mid + 1;

tmp_pos = tmp_pos + 1;

for (i = 0; i <= num_elements; i++)

numbers[right] = temp[right];
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
right = right - 1;

Update: January 14, 2010.

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com

You might also like