Chapter 3 - Basic Logical Concepts - For Students PDF
Chapter 3 - Basic Logical Concepts - For Students PDF
Chapter 3 - Basic Logical Concepts - For Students PDF
1
Two basic categories of human reasoning
certainly definitely
absolutely conclusively
It logically follows that
It is logical to conclude that
This logically implies that
This entails that
Induction indicators
probably likely
One would expect that
It is plausible to suppose that
It is reasonable to assume that
Chances are that
Odds are that
COMMON PATTERNS OF DEDUCTIVE REASONING
1. Hypothetical syllogism
2. Categorical syllogism
3. Argument by elimination
4. Argument based on mathematics
5. Argument from definition
1. HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM
(modus ponens affirming the antecedent)
Pattern: If A, then B.
A.
Therefore, B
1. HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM
(chain argument)
If you miss the bus, youll be late for class.
If youre late for class, youll miss the lesson.
Therefore, if you miss the bus, youll miss the
lesson.
Pattern: If A, then B.
If B, then C.
Therefore, if A then C.
1. HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM
(modus tollens denying the consequent)
Pattern: If A, then B.
Not B.
Therefore, not A.
1. HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM
(denying the antecedent)
If Mr. Smith is President of the U.S., then
hes a famous person.
Mr. Smith is not President of the U.S.
Therefore, hes not a famous person.
Pattern: If A, then B.
Not A.
Therefore, not B.
1. HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM
(affirming the consequent)
If you live in District 1, then you live in
HCMC.
You live in HCMC.
Therefore, you live in District 1.
Pattern: If A, then B.
B.
Therefore, A.
Task: Sort them out.
1. If were in London, then were in England. We are not in England. So, we are not in
London.
2. If were in Los Angeles, then we are in the United States. We are in the United States.
So, we are in Los Angeles.
3. If were in the United States, then we are on Earth. We are in the United States. So,
we are on Earth.
4. If were in Paris, then we are in France. If were in France, then we are in Europe. So,
if we are in Paris, then we are in Europe.
5. If were in Houston, then we are in the United States. We are not in Houston. So, we
are not in the United States.
Task: Sort them out.
Chain argument:
If a father goes with his son, there is one father and one
son.
If this son has a son, then there is a father and two sons.
(or two fathers and a son, or a father, a father and son in
one, and a son)
2. CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
Example 1: With All
All Critical Thinking students in our class are IU students.
All IU students are VNU students.
So, all Critical Thinking students in our class are VNU students.
Example 2:
All arguments are either deductive or inductive.
Jacks argument is not deductive.
Therefore, it is ______.
4. Argument based on Mathematics
Example:
Light travels at a rate of 186,000 miles per hour.
The sun is more than 93 million miles away from the Earth.
Therefore, it takes more than 8 minutes for the sunlight to
reach the Earth.
5. Argument from Definition
Example:
Mary is 13 years old. Therefore, she is a teenager.
Deductive validity
Valid deductive arguments: conclusion must follow from premises;
in other words, its impossible that all premises are true but the
conclusion is false.
Example 1:
If you want to get a scholarship, youll have to study hard.
You certainly want to get the scholarship.
Therefore, youll have to study hard.
Valid
Example 2:
If you want to get a scholarship, youll have to study hard.
You dont study hard at all.
Therefore, you will get the scholarship.
Invalid
Deductive validity (cont)
Valid deductive arguments: may be sound or unsound
Example 1:
All IU students do their majors in English.
Im an IU student.
Therefore, I do my major in English.
Valid and sound
Example 2:
All IU students are aliens.
Im an IU student.
Therefore, Im an alien.
Valid but unsound
Generalization of deductive validity
Task: Valid/Invalid - Sound/Unsound?
M<Y<L<X
1. Inductive generalization
2. Predictive argument
3. Argument from authority
4. Causal argument
5. Statistical argument
6. Argument from analogy
1. INDUCTIVE GENERALIZATION
My boyfriend never gives me a flower on
Valentine or March 8. All men are so
unromantic!
strong
5. Statistical argument
100% of IU students have to learn Critical
Thinking while this subject is optional at
University X. Therefore, IU certainly has
more logical and critical minds than
University X.
5. Statistic-based puzzle
Which English word that 100% of correct
English speakers pronounce wrong?
6. ARGUMENT FROM ANALOGY
- A is an IU student and shes confident and dynamic.
- B is an IU student and hes confident and dynamic.
- C is an IU student, so shes confident and dynamic too.
Weak
Strong
Analogy-based Puzzle
It smells like blue paint, pours like green
paint, and it looks like a red truck.
What is it?
FURTHER PRACTICE
ON
The argument assumes that what worked for Britt will work
for Andy. Perhaps Andy is in poor health and would not
even survive the surgery
Inductive strengths
Strong inductive arguments: The conclusion is probably true if the
premises are true.
Weak inductive arguments: Premises, even if they are assumed to
be true, do not make the conclusion probable.
Example 1:
Kim has been studying hard for the last semester. She is probably
trying to gain a scholarship.
Strong
Example 2:
About 5% of IU students are international students now. Kim is an
IU student. So she is probably an international student.
Weak
Inductive strengths (cont)
Strong and weak inductive arguments come in degrees:
Example 1:
There is a 90% chance that Tom will pass the exam.
Therefore, he will probably pass the exam.
Example 2:
There is a 60% chance that Tom will pass the exam.
Therefore, he will probably pass the exam.
Example 3:
There is a 40% chance that Tom will pass the exam.
Therefore, he will probably pass the exam.
Inductive strengths (cont)
Strong inductive arguments may be cogent or uncogent:
Example 1:
Its still the rainy season and it has been raining for the last 3 days.
Therefore, it is probably going to rain today.
Strong and cogent
Example 2:
All the rainy days have resulted in dry weather.
Therefore, well probably have dry weather today because its
raining.
Strong but uncogent
Generalization of inductive arguments
Task: Turn these into arguments then
evaluate them.
1. Bill : Im sure some of the seniors were late to practice this morning.
Diane : How do you know?
Bill : Because the coach said that anyone late to practice this
morning would have to do wind sprints, and I just saw some of
the seniors doing wind sprints. Thatll teach them.
Argument: If students are late to practice, they will have to do wind sprints.
Some seniors did wind sprints.
Therefore, they were late to practice.
Invalid (affirming the consequent)
2. Cigarette smoking causes lung cancer. Therefore, if you have been a heavy
cigarette smoker for many years, you will die of lung cancer.
Strong but uncogent: (First premise is false. Smoking just increases the risk of
lung cancer)
Task: Apply critical reasoning to evaluate
these arguments.
Argument 1
53
Can Seaside represent the whole country?
What are the causes of depression in
Seaside? Are they the same in other
towns and cities?
54
Argument 2
55
Is there any economic crisis during the
past five years?
Has there been any change in terms of the
companys management or products?
56
Argument 3
57
Is there any evidence of improvement
apart from the opinion of the Ministry?
Does the program, as its name suggest,
teach the basic knowledge?
Are there qualified teachers throughout
the nation?
58
Argument 4
Parents of young children are
becoming increasingly concerned
about how violence on television Negative correlation:
Ratings
When parents are more
might influence a childs behavior concerned, the ratings
and attitudes. During the past of Real Crime decline
year, the ratings for Real Crime,
one of our networks most popular
prime-time shows, have steadily
declined. Therefore, in order to
boost our prime-time ratings, we
should replace Real Crime with a
comedy show.
Parental
concern
59
Do children watch the program?
Does the program show violence?
Does the program change the time slot?
Are there any competing programs at the same time?
Was the program popular because of a famous MC?
60
Argument 5
61
Are province Xs students representative the
nations students as a whole?
Are provinces Xs undergraduates a group of
excellent students?
Are province Xs graduates just a small number?
Are province Xs graduates majors not popular
in the job market?
62
Argument 6
63
Are XYZ teachers was qualified as ABC
teachers?
Are XYZ students as gifted as ABC
students?
Are bonuses as a good encouragement as
a salary rise?
Is the citys competition as difficult as the
districts competition?
64
65