Lab 4
Lab 4
III. Procedure
The procedure for Lab 4 is found in Principles of Food Composition, Laboratory
Manual, FS&T 101A (2015) page 31. There were no modifications for this lab.
IV. Data
Table 1: Extra Virgin Olive Oil Titration. Normality of NaOH = 0.1104 N
Titration # Weight (g) Start NaOH End NaOH Total NaOH
Volume (ml) Volume (ml) used (ml)
1 27.5 19.10 22.10 3.00
2 27.6 22.21 25.40 3.19
3 27.6 22.50 28.20 2.70
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Column 1 3 1.001 0.333667 0.00076
Column 2 3 0.391 0.130333 0.000329
Column 3 3 0.306 0.102 0.000189
ANOVA
Source of VariationSS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups
0.095817 2 0.047908 112.4022 1.76E-05 5.143253
Within Groups
0.002557 6 0.000426
Total 0.098374 8
Average % Acidity
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
EVOO POO ELOO
V. Calculations
Calculating average % acidity:
Using Group Nines data for the EVOO %acidity, calculating the mean of the trials can
be done by adding all 3 numbers together and dividing by the sample size.
0.336% + 0.360% + 0.305% = 0.333%
3
Calculating sample standard deviation:
Once the mean has been calculated, the standard deviation can begin to be calculated by
subtracting the mean from each number in the data set.
0.336-0.333= 0.003
0.360-0.333= -0.027
0.350-0.333= -0.017
Square each of the differences
(0.003)2 = 9.00 x 10-6
(0.027)2 = 7.29 x 10-4
(0.017)2 = 2.89 x 10-4
Add the squared numbers together and divide by n-1. In this case, 3-1=2. Then, take the
square root of the resulting number to calculate sample standard deviation.
9.00 x 10-6 +7.29 x 10-4 +2.89 x 10-4 = 1.03 x 10-3
2
5.1510-4= 0.023
Calculating %Acidity
First, multiply the volume of NaOH used in liters times the concentration of the NaOH.
This gives the equivalents of NaOH. Oleic is a monoprotic acid, so the equivalents of NaOH is
the same as the equivalents of oleic acid. Multiply the equivalents of oleic acid times the
equivalent weight of oleic acid (282 g/mol) to find the mass of oleic acid.
For the first titration of EVOO:
Next, divide the mass of oleic acid by the mass of the olive oil used. Multiply this
number by 100 to get the % acidity.
VI. Results/Discussion
Table 6 shows that at least one of the oils is significantly different from the other oils
because the F value is greater than the F critical and the P value is lower than the alpha
value. According to figure 1, EVOO is significantly different from POO and ELOO. The
error bars on ELOO and POO do overlap so they are not significantly different. To be
labeled as EVOO the oil must abide by a certain set of standards. EVOO is not heat or
chemically treated so it has a low fatty acid content and high polyphenol content.
However, in this experiment it was found that both ELOO and POO have lower fatty acid
contents than the EVOO. Refined oils are sometimes neutralized and this can be seen
with the low % acidity for each titration of ELOO. POO is a mixture of different quality
olive oils. The low fatty acid content shows that refined oils can be part of this mixture.
In the taste test, EVOO was assumed to be olive oil #3. It had the darkest color, and
deepest aroma and taste. This experiment does not quantify polyphenol content, but
perhaps the rich attributes are contributed by the minimal processing of the olives to
make EVOO. Olive oil #2 was assumed to be POO, because the flavor and aroma profiles
were much less intense than oil # 3. Oil # 1 had even weaker qualities and was assumed
to be ELOO. While it was difficult to sense acidity in the olive oils by taste, the titration
data shows that all of the oils had less than 0.4% acidity. Pure olive oil should have a
%acidity closer to 1%, but only displayed an average of 0.130%, which may contribute to
the difficulty in tasting different levels of acidity in these oils.
VII. Conclusion
The purpose of this experiment was to quantify the % oleic acid of each of the three olive
oils and see if each oil fit the qualifications for its particular grade. % Acidity is an
important factor in determining a grade of oil along with its processing method and
polyphenol content.
VIII. Questions
1. Describe in your own words what extra virgin olive oil is. Use both analytical and
sensory terms/ attributes in your description.
EVOO is the highest quality olive oil. It has a specific set of standards it must abide by to
be labeled and sold as EVOO. It should have a dark green color and high polyphenol
content. It should also have a free fatty acid content of <0.8%. It is able to maintain its
flavor components due to its minimal processing. The olives are harvested early and cold
pressed once. There is no heat or chemical treatment on the olives.
2. Based on your statistical analysis are there any real differences in % oleic acid content
among the oils? In your answer make sure you refer to F value and post hoc analysis.
In the ANOVA single factor analysis, the F value was larger than the F critical value and
the P value was lower than the alpha value of 0.05 indicating there at least one group was
significantly different from the others. To determine which groups are different, a post
hoc analysis must be done. Excel cannot provide this test, so the mean %acidity of each
of the oils was graphed with their standard deviations. The error bars for POO and ELOO
overlapped, so they are not significantly different but the EVOOs error did not overlap
anything indicating that group is significantly different from the other ones.
3. What assumptions are you making by basing the titratable acidity on oleic acid molecular
weight? Can you suggest a better alternative?
By using the MW of oleic acid to calculate % acidity, we are assuming the most of the
fatty acids in the oil are oleic acid. Oleic acid can make up up to 80% of the fatty acid
profile in olive oil. A more accurate result can come from the analysis of other acids in
the solution such as palmitic or linoleic.