Scribd
Upload
460 views1 page

Dragons Den Rubric

This rubric assesses student projects for the Dragons Den project on four criteria: knowledge, application, communication, and thinking. Each category is scored on a scale from 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. Knowledge measures how well points are supported by facts, examples, and statistics. Application evaluates how clear, accurate, and thorough the presented information is. Communication assesses the accuracy, relevance, and strength of any counterarguments. Thinking considers how in-depth the team's understanding of their invention is and how easily they present the information.

Uploaded by

kerrywensley499
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
460 views1 page

Dragons Den Rubric

This rubric assesses student projects for the Dragons Den project on four criteria: knowledge, application, communication, and thinking. Each category is scored on a scale from 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest score. Knowledge measures how well points are supported by facts, examples, and statistics. Application evaluates how clear, accurate, and thorough the presented information is. Communication assesses the accuracy, relevance, and strength of any counterarguments. Thinking considers how in-depth the team's understanding of their invention is and how easily they present the information.

Uploaded by

kerrywensley499
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Dragons Den Project Assessment Rubric

Teacher Name: Mrs Turner


Student Names:
CATEGORY

________________________________________

Knowledge

Every major
point was well
supported with
several
relevant facts,
statistics
and/or
examples.

Every major
point was
adequately
supported with
relevant facts,
statistics
and/or
examples.

Every major
Every point was
point was
not supported.
supported with
facts, statistics
and/or
examples, but
the relevance
of some was
questionable.

Application

All information
presented in
the debate was
clear, accurate
and thorough.

Most
information
presented in
the debate
was clear,
accurate and
thorough.

Most
information
presented in
the debate was
clear and
accurate, but
was not usually
thorough.

Information had
several
inaccuracies OR
was usually not
clear.

Communication All counterarguments


were accurate,
relevant and
strong.

Most counterarguments
were accurate,
relevant, and
strong.

Most counterarguments
were accurate
and relevant,
but several
were weak.

Counterarguments
were not
accurate and/or
relevant

Thinking

The team
clearly
understood
their invention
in-depth and
presented their
information
with ease.

The team
seemed to
understand the
main points of
their invention
and presented
those with
ease.

The team did


not show an
adequate
understanding
of their
invention.

The team
clearly
understood
their invention
in-depth and
presented their
information
forcefully and
convincingly.

You might also like