PYP100 Lab NEWE
PYP100 Lab NEWE
Contents
1 Study of a power supply
1.1 Introduction . . . . . .
1.2 The Network Board-1 .
1.3 Experiment A . . . . .
1.4 Experiment B . . . . .
1.5 Experiment C . . . . .
1.6 Experiment D . . . . .
1.7 Experiment E . . . . .
1.8 Experiment F . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
21
25
25
26
28
28
29
31
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
39
39
40
41
41
41
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
53
a capacitor
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6 BH curve tracing
97
71
71
72
73
75
77
81
82
85
86
87
.
.
.
.
.
Cauchys Contants
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
123
123
124
126
130
132
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
139
. 139
. 139
. 140
. 144
147
163
12 Diffraction grating
173
187
Contents 5
Table 1:
Example:
To
find
S.No. Weight in g. Deflection in cm.
1
w
65.2
2
w + 50
65.4
3
w + 100
65.6
4
w + 150
65.7
5
w+ 200
66.0
6
w + 250
66.2
7
w + 300
66.4
*
the
deflection/150
g.
Deflection/150g (cm/g)
65.7 - 65.2 = 0.5
66.0 = 65.4 = 0.6
66.2 - 65.6 = 0.6
Ignored for even no. of readings
Never use any of the readings more than once, even if one of the values remains unused as above. This way any errors you may have made in recording
a particular reading only affects one of the differences in the table.
Graphs:
1. As far is possible, choose the scale on the axis of any graph such that
the least count of the graph paper is equal to the least count of the
variable being plotted on that axis. Always write the proper units on
the labels for each axis, and the proper units for the slope if you find
it.
2. To calculate slopes there are two possibilities.
Contents 9
dy dy1 = d(dy1)
y4 y3 = dy
x
y
x + 0.5h y4
x + 1.5h y5
dy2 dy = d(dy2)
y6 y5 = dy2
x + 2.5h y6
equal to,
Slope(x, y) = [dy + {dy1 + d(dy1)/2h} + {dy2 d(dy2)/2h}]/3h
The above formula follows from the usual definition of the derivative and
Taylor series expansions about (x, y).
If the data are not equally spaced about (x, y) then the two second derivative terms will not cancel but if h is comparable to the least count then no
appreciable error is made in using this simple formula even in such a case.
Though it might appear from the above that every calculation can be
done from a table. plotting a graph always shows you the general behavior
of the data and should be done. When doing so, the curve need not pass
through all the data points but (must be smooth and as close as possible a
fit) to all of them.
To draw such a curve, take a piece of transparent plastic tube, of the
type used in room coolers, or a strip of transparent plastic 1 12 of the
type used for covering books or making overhead transparencies. Bend this
strip on your graph paper (it must be stiff) so that it passes close to the data
points. Hold it in position and use it as a guide to draw the curve.
Results:
Calculate and report the error in your results, as will be described in detail
below, the three most commonly used measures are,
1. Probable error
2. Maximum possible error or instrumental error.
3. Percentage error or deviation from the standard value.
The last need not be reported, as the conditions of your experiment are
not the same as those under which standard values are measured. You can
however mention the standard value if you know it.
If you have more than five independent observations always calculate the
probable error otherwise use the maximum possible error.
An example of how to report your results. If you measured the coefficient
of linear expansion of copper to be 0.00001856/K with a maximum possible
error of 0.000002365/K then write the answer as,
Coefficient of Linear expansion of Copper= (1.86 + 0.24) 10 5/K
the standard value at room temperature is= 1.66 10 5/K.
While calculating results, retain all the significant figure in the result is comparable to the most significant figure in the error.
Errors:
As mentioned above, errors can be of many kinds and a brief description follows. First of all there are the so called systematic errors, e.g. personal ones
like parallax in observing meter readings, or instrumental ones like backlash
or wrong marking of the scale. Please avoid these errors while taking down
your readings.
Apart from these however the fact that every instrument has finite accuracy(a finite least count) means that if you take several observations very
carefully they will still not give you identical results,. If your observations
are good then the results of each set will be distributed randomly about a
mean value which is the true result.
Contents 11
To characterize this spread in the results due to the finite least count of
the apparatus we use two kinds of error measurements:
1. Maximum Possible Error
2. Probable error.
Maximum Possible Error:
Consider the measurement of the density of a solid cube of Mass M and side
L. Then the density is,
M
(1)
D = ( 3)
L
However any measurement of mass M or weight can only be performed to an
accuracy dM, the least count of the balance used. Similarly, lengths L can be
measured to within the accuracy dL of the measuring rod used. To calculate
the inherent (instrumental error) due to the least counts of the measuring
instruments we start by taking logs on both sides followed by differentiation:
M
L
D
=
+3
.
(2)
D
M
L
As the errors is general can be positive or negative, to find the maximum
error, we must take the absolute magnitudes of all the derivatives involved
and add them. The corresponding fractional error is referred to as the (maximum possible error or instrumental error). This formula is also sometimes
referred to as the log error. This error must always be calculated and the
result written down as,
Density = D D
(3)
Note that in this method, if the difference or sum of two experimental quantities appears in a formula, then the error doubles. For example, the heat
transferred per unit time Q across a sample by conduction is proportional
to the temperature difference (T1 T2 ) across it. Q = S(T1 T2 ). The
maximum possible error in this case is:
dS
2dT
dQ
=
+
Q
S
(T1 T2 )
(4)
Apart from such inherent instrumental errors, there are the random individual errors that you make in taking down each reading. To deal with these,
we use the concept of probable error.
Probable error:
You are probably aware from courses on probability theory that under very
general assumptions, any long sequence of independent observations of a
variable x will be found to follow a Gaussian or normal distribution,
p(x)dx = (1/2S)exp[(x x)2 /2S]dx.
(5)
Here p(x) is the probability that the observation lies in an interval dx about
the value x. Then as can be easily seen,
Z
T hemean = x = xp(x)dx
(6)
Z
andstandarddeviation = S = { (x x)2 xp(x)dx}1/2
(7)
The quantity S is a measure of how spread out your observations are about x
and thus a measure of goodness or otherwise of the readings. It is referred
to as the (probable error).
The formula as given above is impractical as it requires an infinite number
of observations to evaluate the integrations. When only a finite number, n
of observations is made, we replace the integrals by summations to obtain,
X
x = (1/n)
xj ,
(8)
j
S = (1/n)
(xj x)2 .
(9)
This quantity must always be calculated and reported when the number of
observations is large(> 4). The result then is reported as,
Result = x
dx
(S)
(10)
instrumental error
probable error
Note that the two errors are not to be summed.
Problems:
1. Student in a class get the following marks out of 50,
36.5, 30, 20, 32, 29, 36.5, 26.5, 22, 32.5, 22, 29.5, 18.
Find the mean mark and the standard deviation after normalizing the total
to 100. Plot a gaussian with the same mean and deviation along with the
data given above on a graph.
Contents 13
Parallax Removing:
For optics experiments (in this lab for the Fresnels Biprism experiment)
another important error introducing factor is parallax- so for such experiments, we have to learn how to remove parallax.
In all cases of optical measurements where an accurate determination of
the position of an image is sought for, we take recourse to the method of
parallax.
Let P1 represent a line drawn on transparent screen and P2 , the image of a
linear object. Both P1 and P2 stand perpendicular to the plane of paper. An
eye placed in the position E behind the screen sees both the line coincident.
As the observer moves his eyes to the position E1 and E2 , a relative motion
occurs between P1 and P2 . The same relative motion takes place when the
image is formed between P1 and the eye. this relative motion ceases only
when P1 and P2 coincide. This method of finding the position of an image
by making it coincide with a reference line and point is known as the method
of parallax.
In order to ascertain, during adjustment, whether the image is formed
in front of or behind the screen, move your eyes across the line joining P1
and P2 . If the image moves in the same direction as the eye (with respect of
P1 the reference line), then the image is further away from the eye than the
screen. If the image moves in the opposite direction, then it is nearer to the
eye than the screen.
To avoid parallax, either the screen or the lens or the mirror forming
the image or the object itself is slowly displaced until there is no parallax
between the image and the reference line.
Using the balance:
1. Look at the plumb-line and make sure, that the balance is level. If
necessary, level it by turning the leveling screw at the base or ask for
help.
2. Determine the zero point, i.e. the equilibrium position of the pointer
when passed are empty.
3. Place body to be weighed on left-hand pan and weights systematically
, only when the beam is in the arrested position and then release the
beam and check.
4. By trial put enough weight on right pan so that the new position of the
pointer appears to lie within 5 pointer to the right of zero point. Allow
the beam to oscillate and take readings of 3 to 5 successive turning
points. Call it Q.
5. Add 10 mgm weight to right-hand pan and find corresponding restposition call it R. Record the data as follows:
Load on
left-pan
Nil
Load on
right pan
Nil
Body
15.23 g
Body
Turning points
Mean
Left
Right Left Right
a) 4.9 a) 15.1 5.2
15.0
b) 5.3 b) 14.8
c) 5.6
a) 10.1 a) 20.4 10.5 20.3
b) 10.5 b) 20.1
c) 10.8
a) 3.8
a) 9.6
3.4
9.7
b) 3.4 b) 9.5
c) 3.1
Zero
point
10.2
(P)
Rest
positions
15.4(Q)
6.6(R)
Mass of body:
W = 15.23 is smaller than that of body by an amount which causes displacement of pointer = 15.4 10.2 = 5.2 div. Now, causes displacement of 5.2
div would be caused by5.2/8.8 10mgm = 5.9mgm = 0.0059gm. Therefore
mass of body= 15.23 + 0.0059 = 15.2359.
PYP100
storage/leakage mechanisms in the capacitor. How close is the real capacitor to the ideal
behavior? Calculate equivalent series resistances RS1, RS2, RS3 for RSH, 2RSH and 3RSH.
C. PHASE RELASHIONSHIP FOR CURRENTS: Measure currents I0, IC, IRSH for all the
three values of RSH and draw current vector diagrams. Compare the values with the
corresponding phase values obtained from the voltage vector diagrams of the shunted C.
D. PHASE RELASHIONSHIP IN LR CIRCUIT AND POWEWR LOSS RESISTANCE:
Take an inductor and make LR circuit. Using R and Vo as the two variables determine the
power loss resistance r of this inductor by drawing vector diagrams. Plot variation of r
vs R and Vo. Try to answer (1) whether this resistance r is independent of the values of
R and Vo or dependent on them & why. (2) If dependent, then whether the dependence is
primarily on these two variables or on some other parameter. Try to identify that
parameter. Plot r vs that parameter to find the dependence of r on the identified
parameter. This identified parameter should be the current in LR circuit.
EXPT 5: STUDY OF CHARGING AND DISCHARGING OF A CAPACITOR
We know theoretically the charging is exponential. Does it actually remain so as charging
proceeds and full charged condition is approached. OR does it deviate from exponential
behavior. If yes, is the observed deviation physically possible? Also when does deviation occur
from exponential behavior and why? Is this deviation linked to the value of series resistance used
with C. To answer this, take a given C and make two RC combinations with time constant values
of say 20 s and 120 s. Do charging using Vo = 18 V for a time of about 4 times RC in both cases.
Through log graph, try to observe the deviation from exponential nature. Only the log
graph (being a straight line) can conclusively prove exponential behavior.
To do the energy part and prove dependence of E on Vo, C and R; as well as E dissipated in
three step adiabatic charging; pre-decide the values of C, R and Vo necessary to complete all the
tasks in minimum number of sets (C,R,Vo). Calculate energy in Joule for each case using graph.
Learn how to get observations in the 1st time constant duration at intervals of 2 or 3 s. You may
realize that interval between two observations need not remain same throughout the charging
process. Do not forget to record current during charging at t=0 (what is its significance).
Explain physically why adiabatic charging dissipates lesser energy and why energy does
not depend on R. Also see if capacitor has +/ terminals, and what is their significance.
EXPT 6: HYSTERESIS (B-H) LOOP OF MAGNETIC MATERIAL
We know that the magnetization M vs. applied field H curve of a diamagnet is straight line (with
negative slope) passing through origin and for a paramagnet PM this line has positive slope. It is
not so for a ferromagnet FM. A freshly prepared sample of FM has zero magnetization. When
subjected to external magnetic field, the magnetization M increases in a non-linear fashion with
H, and finally saturate at some high value of magnetic field called Hsat. If we now decrease H,
M-H curve does not retrace its path. Rather at H=0 there is a finite magnetization remaining,
called remanence Mr or remanent magnetization. This happens because magnetic domains of FM
have been forced to align in the direction of applied field during the initial field ramping from
H=0 to Hsat. This is how a permanent magnet is formed. So we need to apply magnetic field in
the reverse direction to turn around the magnetization. The (negative) applied field that reduces
magnetization to zero is called coercive field HC or simply the Coercivity. To do this we need to
do work and hence energy is dissipated. If we continue to increase the negative field the
magnetization will grow in negative direction to eventually saturate at Hsat. If now field is
increased in positive direction, M will start turning back slowly first, till zero applied field, at
which M equals Mr. Thereafter, M(H) will change rapidly, will pass through zero at +HC, and
then will reach saturation again at Hsat. The M-H curve between Hsat and + Hsat is reproducible
and is called Hysteresis loop. The area within the loop represents the energy spent in turning the
magnetization. Hard and soft FM materials are characterized by their values of Mr, HC and Hsat.
If a given magnetic material possess say FM and PM constituents, than we will observe M-H
loop but without saturation.
It is also common to indicate the magnetization behavior of the pure ferromagnetic material by a
B-H loop, instead of M-H loop. The correspondence between the shapes of the two can be
understood by recalling that (in SI units) B 0 ( H M ) , here B=magnetic flux density,
H=applied magnetic field strength (by varying the current in an electromagnet/solenoid, and
M=magnetization induced in the material along the direction of applied field.
D. Do the em damping part as in lab manual, for open circuit, short circuit, R= 1-2 K,
100 F, 1000/2000 F. Conclude why em damping occurs and exactly how does it
physically happen. Compare the em damping due to the two capacitors. Give reasons
why C does em damping and does this damping occur all the time.
1.
Study of a power supply
1.1
Introduction
A car battery can supply 12 volts. So can 8 dry cells in series. But no
one would consider using the dry cells to start a car. Why not? Obviously,
the dry cells cannot supply the large current required to start the car. The
point is that the resistance of the source for the car battery( 0.1 ohm)
is considerably smaller than that for the 8 dry cells( 5 to 70 ohms) in
series .A power supply which happens to be another commonly used source
in the laboratory has a widely varying resistance; for a regulated power supply
it may be as small as 0.1 ohm. A source of emf figure 1.1(a) ,therefore, must
be represented not just by its voltage Vs but by its source resistance Rs as well
figure 1.1(b). It is convenient to think of the source Vs and its resistance Rs
as enclosed in an imaginary box(indicated by the dotted line in figure 1.1(b)
with terminals A and B, which we can put to any use we like. Electrical
networks may be complicated but it is often very useful to think of parts of
it as a box with certain parameters associated with it-in the above case the
parameters being Vs and Rs .
* There are, of course, many other factors that dictate practical use of a power source.
Consideration of cost, convenience of use, rechargeability, available power and energy etc.
are some of these. For example, a dry cell may give only a few watt-hours of energy and
cannot be recharged whereas a car battery can give 500 watt-hours and, with care, can
be recharged any number of times. A power supply, on the other hand, derives its power
continuously from the a.c. mains and hence needs no charging and can deliver any amount
of energy. We shall however, not discuss these factors here, important as they are.
Figure 1.1:
Suppose we are given such a box with terminals A and B and we have to
determine Rs and Vs . First let us see how to do this in principle, We connect a
voltmeter of very high resistance(ideally infinite) so that it draws no current.
It will measure Vs directly. We can now connect an ammeter(ideally zero
resistance) and measure the current which will be
i = Vs /Rs
(1.1)
Thus, we may define the source resistance as the open circuit voltage
between A and B divided by the current when A and B are short-circuited.
In practice, we may have to exercise caution since the short circuit current
may be very large and damage the instrument or the source itself.
We may now adopt the following attitude. The terminals A and B provide
a certain source of voltage Vs with a source resistance Rs . Actually, Rs may
include other circuit elements as well. For example, think of the arrangements
Figure 1.2:
in figure 1.1(a) and figure 1.1(b). For these too we can represent the source
by a certain output voltage Vs and source resistance Rs as shown in figure
1.1(b). For the case of figure1.1(a) Ohms law gives us
Vs = Vo
R1 R2
Rs
, Rs =
R1 + R2
R1 + R2
(1.2)
We can now say that we have a source of output voltage Vs across the terminals AB, with an effective resistance Rs . This effective source resistance Rs
is often called the output resistance of the device as seen from AB. We shall
develop the above ideas with a few simple experiments.
1.2
The network board for our experiment is shown in Plate 1. It contains three
groups of resisters R1 ,R2 ,R3 , each group having several different resistors to
choose from. It has a d-c milliammeter and a d-c voltmeter. Figure 1.3
shows the details of connections provided underneath the board. It will be
seen that one could choose any one resistor from group R1 and any one from
group R2 to make up a source like that in figure 1.1(a). The third set of
resistors R3 are all connected in series and can be used as load. One could
plug-in at any pair of points and get the desired value of the load.
1.3
Experiment A
Figure 1.4:
Let the dotted box in the figure 1.4 with AB for its output terminals be
our source. As can be seen from the figure, in fact it consists of a power
supply of voltage Vo and a potential divider arrangement made of resistors R1
and R2 . We have to measure its output voltage across AB and then calculate
its output resistance Rs .
(1.3)
Vs VL
Drop in output voltage
=
Load current
i
(1.4)
1.4
Experiment B
R2
R1 + R2
(1.5)
You may check the measured Vs against the value calculated from eq(1.5).
The dependence of the value of the output resistance Rs on R1 and R2 is
Figure 1.5:
obvious. Eq(1.5) shows that if both R1 and R2 are changed by the same
factor, Vs does not change. The value of Rs should, however, change. Let us
examine this by experiment.
With one set of R1 and R2 measure Rs as in Expt A. Now change the
resistors xR1 and xR2 where x is some common factor. Measure R2 again.
Repeat this with different values of x and examine how Rs varies with x.
The behavior of Rs with x can be discussed as below. Figure 1.6(a) and
figure 1.6(b) are equivalent. One can now see from the latter that if the
power supply itself has a negligible resistance, then inside the source R1
and R2 are in parallel, so that the output resistance of the source as seen at
AB should be
R1 R2
Rs0 =
(1.6)
R1 + R2
By changing both R1 and R2 by a factor x, the new output resistance Rs0 will
be given by
xR1 .xR2
xR1 R2
=
= xRs
(1.7)
xR1 + xR2
R1 + R2
Thus for a given ratio of R1 /R2 i.e. for a given ratio of Vs /V0 , the output
resistance comes out to be proportional to x.
Using Ohms law, deduce an expression for the current i drawn by a load
RL connected across AB in figure 1.6(a). Use this result to obtain expressions
for Vs and Rs .
Rs0 =
1.5
Experiment C
(1.8)
1.6
Experiment D
whereas the output resistance Rs does. Using this knowledge try different
arrangements of R1 and R2 . Measure the output resistance Rs in each case
(Expt A). Also measure the variation of the power P delivered to the load
RL for each value of Rs .
Plot the following quantities as a function of the load; (a) the load current i (b) the voltage VL across the load (c) the power dissipated in the load
(d) the fraction of power dissipated in the load upon power expended by the
source. You will see that maximum power is delivered when the load RL is
equal to the output resistance Rs . This disarmingly simple result is of great
importance and you will come across it again and again in various forms.
The idea is that the load resistance should match the output resistance for
maximum power transf er . You will also notice that the current i is maximum when RL is zero, the voltage VL across the load is maximum when RL is
infinite but the power iVL dissipated in the load is maximum when RL = Rs
and is equal to Vs2 /4Rs . Remember, this is not the power expended by the
source which is Vs2 /2Rs .
A source of output voltage Vs and output resistance Rs when connected across
s
and delivers power to the load directly
a load RL gives a current i = RsV+R
L
2
given by P = i RL Show, using differential calculus, that P is maximum when
RL = Rs .
1.7
Experiment E
1.8
Experiment F
*** This could be done immediately after Expt A as an exercise to see how any
source(with whatever complicated details) can be replaced by an equivalent circuit of an
emf Vs and a series resistance Rs . You would need some extra resistors in addition to your
Network Board for doing this experiment
APPENDIX
Carbon Resistors
Carbon, either alone or in combination with other materials, is used in making a class of resistors which are commonly used in radio and other communication circuits. After the advent of transistors and integrated circuits
where one seldom handles large power, their use has gone up phenomenally.
The commonest form of mass-produced resistors is the composition resistor,
in which the conducting material, graphite or some other form of carbon,
is mixed with fillers that serve as diluents and combined with an organic
binder. Two general types of composition resistors are the solid body, which
is moulded or extruded, and the filament type, in which carbon is baked on
a glass or a ceraminc rod and sealed in a ceramic or bakelite tube.
Composition resistors of the usual type are, however, notoriously unstable
in resistance values. If they are used only at a low power level, the change
in resistance results principally from the effect of humidity on the unit. If
operated near the rated load, the changes in resistance result primarily from
decomposition of the organic binder.
Much better stability is found in a special film type of resistor known as a
pyrolitic or cracked carbon resistor. Such resistors are made by depositing
crystalline carbon at a high temperature on a ceramic rod by cracking
an appropriate hydrocarbon. In one process for making these film resistors,
carbon is deposited from methane gas in a nitrogen atmosphere from which
water vapour and oxygen are carefully excluded. No binder is used, and the
carbon deposits consist of a hard gray crystalline form from which graphite
and carbon black are completely absent. After the deposit is formed, the
resistor is adjusted to its required value by cutting a helical groove around
the cylinder with a diamond impregnated copper wheel. This removes part of
the deposit and leaves a helical conductor of a suitable length and width for
the desired resistance. After terminals are applied by a suitable process, the
surface of a resistor is lacquered with some silicon type of varnish to provide
insulation, moisture resistance and mechanical protection. These are then
sorted out by measurement with a bridge in series having a tolerance of 10%
or 5% or less.
For 1 watt 10k resistors of this type, a typical temperature coefficient is
-0.02% per C (minus sign indicates a decrease of resistance with increase in
temperature unlike the wire-wound resistors) and for a 5megaohm resistor
Figure 1.6:
Figure 1.7:
Figure 1.8:
Figure 1.9:
Figure 1.10:
Figure 1.11:
Figure 1.12:
2.
Phase Measurement By Superposition
2.1
Introduction
The method of vector diagrams for determining the magnitudes and relative
phases of voltages and currents in a-c networks is not easy in many cases.
Consider, for example, the following circuit.
Figure 2.1:
If you want to know the phase difference between the voltages VA and VB
it would not at all be a simple matter to infer this from a vector diagram.(Try
it). For this reason, we introduce a method by which you can determine phase
differences directly and study phase relationships in various networks.
2.2
Principle of measurement
(2.1)
V + = 2V cos
(2.2)
and
so that
=
tan
(2.3)
V+
2
This immediately gives the phase difference . In this way, all phases are
determined relative to the coherent standard.
*i.e, the standard source and the voltage to be measured have a phase difference that
does not change with time. See Appendix I for this.
**The resistance of the potential divider should be sufficiently high( it is about 100k
in the network designed by us) so that it does not disturb the phase or magnitude of the
voltage measured
There may be cases when the voltage to be measured is smaller than the
standard voltage. In this case, we drop the standard voltage across the potential divider until it has the same magnitude as the voltage to be measured
and then the mixing is carried out.
2.3
Network Board
2.4
Experiment A
To study the relative phases of voltages across resistors and capacitors in series
A supply of about 100volts is connected to as series of resistors. Choose
a voltage across one of the resistors (conveniently about 30volts) and measure its phase in the manner suggested; i.e. by dropping to the standard
voltage and mixing it. Repeat this for the other resistors. What information do you get about the phase relationships amongst the voltages across
the various resistors?
Now do the same for a number of capacitors in series. Interpret your
results.
2.5
Experiment B
V
C
V
R
= 1+ ; tan
= 2+
2
2
V1
V2
(2.4)
and
RC = R + C
(2.5)
2.6
Experiment C
2.7
Experiment D
(2.6)
tan ( ) =
2
L
where r is the effective power loss resistance of L. Compare the value r you
obtain this way to the value obtained by triangulation. An agreement within
a factor of two is to be considered satisfactory.
L
The phase difference between Vo and VR is given by tan1 ( R+r
)
Verify this for a large number of combinations.
2.8
Experiment E
LC1
VR and Vo . This phase difference is given by tan1 ( C(R+r)
and will be zero at resonance. Verify this by varying C and then study how
OR changes as you pass through resonance, i.e. as you go from
LC < 12 to LC > 12
2.9
Experiment F
R/L
1+
r(R+r)
2 L2
(2.7)
2.10
Experiment G
2.11
Experiment H
2.12
Experiment I
R+r
Io (R + r)
=
1
1
Io (L C )
L C
r
Io r
=
Io L
L
(2.8)
(2.9)
From these expressions one can deduce the expression for (VC , VLr ) = ,
since = .
APPENDIX-I
Need For Coherent Sources In this board we have used a coherent
standard voltage for mixing with the voltage whose phase is to be determined.
Now the phase difference between these two voltages ought to stay constant
over the time you take to make these measurements. In general, phases of line
voltages hardly maintain constancy over such long periods of time and it is of
no use to compare phases of two a-c voltages which are entirely independent
of each other. It is for this reason that in the board, the standard voltage,
namely the output of a transformer, is deprived from the line which also
feeds the network of the board so that in spite of line fluctuations, phase
differences in your experiment remains constant.
This idea, namely that coherent sources have to be derived from the
same origin, is akin to the one you come across in interference experiments
in physical optics such as, for example, Fresnels biprism. In the case of light,
phase changes of a source occur in about 108 sec. Since the frequency of
visible light is about 6x1011 hz, this means phase fluctuations occur in some
106 cycles. Despite this, the stability is poor since our eye is unable to follow
variations in such a short time which is the reason why you do not observe
interference patterns with independent sources.
The a-c line supply normally achieves a stability of about 1% in frequency.
Thus if you spend 10minutes in taking your readings, your observations last
some 30000 cycles and the uncertainty in phase is many times a full cycle. needless to say, two such sources can hardly be coherent over period of
measurement.
If you can manage it, try to get two separate audio oscillators tuned to
the same frequency and convince yourself that they are not coherent.
Figure 2.2: (a) An arrangement to achieve |V | |VS | and mix the two
voltages. (b) and (c) Voltage measurements after superposition and reversal
of polarity of one of the voltages
Figure 2.3:
Figure 2.4:
Figure 2.5: You can see that (a)Phase of VR (or VC ) is same relative to Vs
and VC (b) RC =R + C
Figure 2.6:
Figure 2.7:
Figure 2.8:
Figure 2.9:
3.
Magnetic field inside Helmholtz
coil arrangement
TEP
4.3.03
-01
Related Topics
Maxwells equations, wire loop, flat coils, Biot-Savarts law, Hall effect.
Principle
The spatial distribution of the field strength between a pair of coils in the Helmholtz arrangement is
measured. The spacing at which a uniform magnetic field is produced is investigated and the superposition of the two individual fields to form the combined field of the pair of coils is demonstrated.
Equipment
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
3
06960.00
13500.93
07134.00
13610.93
13610.01
03001.00
02006.55
02025.55
02040.55
02014.00
07362.04
07362.01
www.phywe.com
P2430301
TEP
4.3.03
-01
Tasks
1. Measure
easure the magnetic flux density along the zaxis of the flat coils when the distance between
them a = R (R = radius of the coils) and when it is
greater and less than this.
2. Measure
easure the spatial distribution of the magnetic
flux density when the distance between
be
coils
a = R, using the rotational symmetry of the set-up:
set
a. measurement of the axial component Bz
b. measurement of radial component Br
3. Measure the radial components Br and Br of the
two individual coils in the plane midway between Fig. 2: Wiring diagram for Helmholtz coils.
them and to demonstrate the overlapping of the
two fields at Br = 0.
P2430301
TEP
4.3.03
-01
Always push the barrel base bearing the Hall probe along the rule in the same direction.
1. Along the z-axis, for reasons of symmetry, the magnetic flux density has only the axial component Bz. Fig. 3 shows how to set up the coils, probe and rules. (The edge of the bench can be
used instead of the lower rule if required.) Measure the relationship B (z, r = 0) when the distance
between the coils a = R and, for example, for a = R/2 and a = 2R.
2. When distance a = R the coils can be joined together with the spacers. a) Measure Bz (z, r) as
shown in Fig. 4. Set the r-coordinate by moving the probe and the z-coordinate by moving the
coils. Check: the flux density must have its maximum value at point (z = 0, r = 0). b) Turn the pair
of coils through 90 (Fig. 5). Check the probe: in the plane z = 0, Bz must = 0.
3. Short-circuit first one coil, then the other. Measure the radial components of the individual fields
at z = 0.
(1)
where K is a closed curve around area F, we obtain for direct currents (= 0), the magnetic flux law
ds =
(2)
which is often written for practical purposes in the form of Biot-Savarts law:
=
!
!
4# $
(3)
where is the vector from the conductor ele is perment d to the measurement point and d
pendicular to both these vectors.
The field strength along the axis of a circular
conductor can be calculated using equation (3).
(Fig. 6).
The vector d is perpendicular to, and and d
lie in, theplane of the sketch, so that
!
=
!
! =
'
$
4#
4# & + '
(4)
www.phywe.com
P2430301
TEP
4.3.03
-01
can be resolved into a radial dHr and an axial dHz component. The dHz components have the same
d
direction for all conductor elements and the quantities are added; the dHr components cancel one
another out, in pairs. Therefore,
* = 0
(5)
and
=
C =
&'
'
2 4& + ' )$/'
(6)
along the axis of the wire loop, while the magnetic flux density
34) =
67
2&
$/'
'
A1 + 9& ; B
(7)
The magnetic field of a flat coil is obtained by multiplying (6) by the number of turns N. Therefore, the
magnetic flux density along the axis of two identical coils at a distance apart is
34, = 0) =
67 8
1
1
?
+
F
$/'
$/'
2&
@@1 + , ' E
@1 + , ' E
-
'
(8)
where
,- =
+ ./2
1 ./2
2
, ,' =
&
&
When z = 0, flux density has a maximum value when < R and a minimum value when > R. The
curves plotted from our measurements also show this (Fig. 7); when = R, the field is virtually uniform in
the range
1
&
&
22+
2
2
67
2
8
= 0.716
716 67 8
$
2&
&
5 '
94;
P2430301
TEP
4.3.03
-01
Figs. 8 and 9 shows the curves Bz (z) and Br (z) measured using r as the parameter; Fig. 10 shows the
super-position of the fields of the two coils at Br = 0 in the centre plane z = 0.
P2430301
TEP
4.3.03
-01
Fig. 10: Radial components Br (r) and Br (r) of the two coils when z = 0.
P2430301
Teslameter, digital
Hall probe, axial
Hall probe, tangential
13610-9099
13610-01
13610-02
5
4
6
3
2
Operating instructions
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
HANDLING
NOTES ON OPERATION
EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE
URE
WASTE DISPOSAL
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
The teslameter
eslameter is suitable for measuring magnetic flux density (induction) B accurately. Two hall probes are supplied for
use as sensors. One of them is specially designed for measuring fields oriented axially in relation to its rod-shaped
rod
stem
(axial probe, order no. 13610-01).
13610
It is suitable for measuring
fields inside coils for instance. The stem is 30 cm long to allow measurements to be taken easily even in the middle of
long coils. The second probe measures fields perpendicular
to its stem (tangential probe, order no. 13610-02), which is
extremely thin and flat for measurements in narrow air gaps
down to about 1 mm.
The meter has 3 switchable measuring ranges:
0 to20 mT (accuracy 0.01 mT)
0 to200
200 mT (accuracy 0.1 mT)
0 to1000
1000 mT (accuracy 1 mT)
Caution!
Carefully read these operating instructions before operating this instrument. This is necessary to avoid damage
to it, as well as for user-safety.
1
www.phywe.com, All rights reserved
13610-90...99 / 3113
The plugs for connecting the mains lead supplied with the
meter and the power switch are to be found on the back of
the meter.
Fig. 1 showss the teslameter with the controls and functional
elements on the front panel:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Input
socket for connecting the hall probes 13610-01
13610
and
13610-02.
Adjusting screw
for rough zeroing.
Stepping switch
for selecting the measuring range.
Changeover switch
for selecting the ALTERNATING FIELD and DIRECT
FIELD measurement modes.
Digital display
for displaying the values measured. 3 digit display with
sign for the direction of the field and decimal point.
Adjusting knob for fine zeroing
Output
for connecting an external measuring instrument, e.g. a
recorder. Output voltage: 1 mV per digit.
HANDLING
4.2 Zeroing
This procedure as described below is only necessary when
direct fields are to be measured. In the case of alternating
fields the meter is zeroed automatically within a few seconds,
5
although
hough a display of 1 digit (10
T) is unavoidable in the 20
mT range.
The mode switch (4)) is to be brought into the DIRECT
FIELD (Gleichfeld) position. Once the hall probe selected for
the measurement has been connected to input (1),
( but before
any field is applied to it, the display is set on zero with the
adjusting knob (6).
). Should this prove impossible the knob is
turned to the middle position and the value displayed minimised by turning the adjusting screw (2)
( with a screwdriver;
fine adjustment is then repeated
epeated with the adjusting knob (6).
We recommend zeroing in the most sensitive range (20 mT)
to avoid the need for re-adjustment
adjustment when higher ranges are
subsequently selected.
It should be noted that the earths magnetic field alone can
produce a reading of 4 digits (40 ) in this range. If no
compensation for this field is to be made during zeroing the
zero adjustment knob is to be set so that turning the probe
through 180 only results in the sign, and not the absolute
value of the field strength displayed, changing.
When the fields of conductors carring a current are to be
measured, before zeroing we recommend positioning the
probe at the measuring point to be used with the magnetic
field current switched off; this eliminates any
an interference
from static stray fields at the same time.
When measuring in the
he 20 mT range zeroing is to be
checked in the first few minutes after the meter is switched
on and corrected if necessary. We recommend switching it
on about ten minutes before starting
s
to take measurements,
by which stage zero drift is insignificant.
4.3 Measuring direct fields
Once the meter has been zeroed it is ready to take measurements. The mode switch (4)
( must be in the DIRECT
FIELD position. The value 1 displayed without leading zeros indicates overranging and hence the need to switch to a
higher range. The direction of the field is also indicated in this
case.
4.4 Measuring alternating fields
The mode switch (4)) is moved to the ALTERNATING FIELD
(Wechselfeld) position. The display returns to zero within a
few seconds when there is no field acting on the probe. The
meter is then ready for use immediately. It should be noted
that in this mode the meter responds to changes in the field
strength within about 3 s. The
he rms value of the value of the
magnetic induction, which is assumed to be sinusoidal, is
displayed. The meter is calibrated for an alternating field frequency of 50 Hz. However extremely accurate measurements are possible at frequencies of up to 500 Hz (limit frequency 5 kHz). The value 1 displayed without leading zeros
indicates overranging and hence the need to switch to a
higher range. Positive values are always displayed in this
mode. Turning the probe through 180 at a fixed measuring
point does not affect the value displayed.
4.5 Using the analog output
External measuring instruments can be connected to the pair
of 4 mm sockets (7).
). In addition to yt and xyt recorders possibilities include computer-aided
aided measuring systems (e.g.
COBRA3 Basic-Unit 12150-50
50).
The output voltage corresponds to the digital display. It is 1
mV per digit; the limits of the indicating range correspond to
2
www.phywe.com, All rights reserved
13610-90...99 / 3113
the output voltage of 1.999 V (positive polarity only with alternating field measurements). The measuring instrument
connected should have an internal resistance of at least 20
k.
NOTES ON OPERATION
This high-quality
quality instrument fulfills all of the technical requirements that are compiled in current EC guidelines. The
characteristics of this product qualify it for the CE mark.
This instrument is only to be put into operation under specialist supervision in a controlled electromagnetic environment in
research, educational and training facilities (schools, universities, institutes and laboratories).
h an environment, no mobile phones
This means that in such
etc. are to be used in the immediate vicinity. The individual
connecting leads are each not to be longer than 2 m.
The instrument can be so influenced by electrostatic charges
and other electromagnetic
ic phenomena that it no
n longer functions within the given technical specifications. The following
measures reduce or do away with disturbances:
Avoid fitted carpets; ensure potential equalization; carry out
experiments on a conductive, earthed surface, use screened
cables, do not operate high-frequency
frequency emitters (radios, mobile phones) in the immediate vicinity. Following a blackout
failure, operate the on/off switch for a reset.
10-5 to1 T
10-5 to 2 T
WASTE DISPOSAL
2%
2%
3%
GaAs,
monocrystalline
0.04%/K
5 kHz
0 to 2 V
1 mV/digit
I
see type plate
50/60 Hz
10 VA
see type plate
225 x 235 x 170 mm
approx. 3.75 kg
300 mm
6 mm
approx. 0.38 kg
75 x 5 x 1 mm
approx. 0.20 kg
EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE
URE
Handbook Laboratory
tory Experiments Physics 16502-32
3
www.phywe.com, All rights reserved
13610-90...99 / 3113
4.
Study of Resistors, Capacitors
and Inductors with an AC Source
5.
Charging and discharging of a
capacitor
5.1
Capacitors
Figure 5.1:
A system of charges, physically separated, has potential energy. The
simplest example is that of two metal plates of large area carrying opposite
A
d
(5.1)
5.2
RC Circuit
Figure 5.2:
S1 on, the capacitor gets charged and when you turn on the switch S2 (S1
off) the capacitor gets discharged through the load. The rate at which the
charge moves, i.e. the current; this, of course, will depend on the resistance
offered. It will be seen, therefore, that the rate of energy transfer will depend
on RC where C is the capacitance and R some effective resistance in the
circuit. It can be shown (Appendix II)that the charging of a capacitor can
be represented by the relation
q = qo (1 et/RC )
(5.2)
where q is the charge on the plates at time t; similarly, the discharge occurs
according to the relation
q = qo et/RC
(5.3)
Thus, the rate at which the charge or discharge occurs depends on the RC of
the circuit. The exponential nature of the charging and discharging processes
of a capacitor is obvious from equation5.2 and 5.3. You would have ample
opportunity to learn more about it through the experiments that follow.
From equation 5.3 it can be seen that RC is the time during which the
charge on the capacitor drops to 1/e of the initial value. Further, since RC
has dimensions of time, it is called the time constant of the circuit.
In the following series of experiments, you will study the time variation
of charge, voltage and energy in an RC circuit.
5.3
Figure 5.3:
to reduce the unwanted discharge through the voltmeter and considerably
improve the performance of the experiments. This would be obvious from
the following discussion. If you look at Figure 5.4 relating to the discharging
of a capacitor, you would realize that on turning the switches S1 and S2 on,
the capacitor would discharge through both the load R and the voltmeter V.
If Rv be the resistance of the meter, the effective leakage resistance R would
be given by
Rv
(5.4)
R0 = R
R + Rv
The unwanted discharge through the meter can, therefore, be reduced only
by making Rv much higher than R. This is accomplished in a simple way
by using a higher voltage source and employing a higher range of the meter
for detection. However, even this would not be adequate in case of smaller
C values where you should employ a sort of sampling method for voltage
measurements. This consists in turning on the switch S2 only at the instant
Figure 5.4:
when a measurement is to be made. You may find it difficult to read the
meter, say every 2 seconds or so. In that case, take one set of readings at
0.6.12.18...sec., then the next set of readings at 2,8,14,20,...sec. and so on
until you have a complete set of readings every 2 seconds.
5.4
Experiment A
Figure 5.5:
capacitor is given by (see Appendix II).
V = Vo (1 et/RC )
(5.5)
where Vo is the maximum voltage. Eq 5.5 means that the capacitor charges
exponentially. Let us verify these facts. Rewriting Eq 5.5, we get
Vo V
= et/RC
Vo
(5.6)
If we now define a time T 1 at which the voltage is half the maximum i.e.
2
V = Vo /2, the above expression would reduce to
T 1 = RC loge 2 = 2.30RC
2
(5.7)
This clearly shows that for a given RC the time T 1 should be constant.
2
Choosing values for (Vo V )/Vo in geometric progression in steps of 21 , the
time intervals T 1 can be easily shown to be equal. See Figure 5.6
2
Eq 5.7 could be examined in yet another way. Make some measurements
of T 1 for different RC combinations and plot these versus RC. In theory this
2
should be a straight line; but the rated values of the components( particularly
C may be as much as 10% off). Thus, the values as determined by you are
probably more reliable than the specified ones.
Alternatively, you may plot log(Vo V ) against t to verify the Eq. 5.5
and the exponential nature of charging of the capacitor. You ought to get a
straight line whose slope would give you the value of -1/RC.
5.5
Experiment B
Figure 5.7:
input and output when the switch is turned on and later, turned off.
Exercises pertaining to Expts A and B
1. Change the voltage Vo of the power supply and see if, for a given RC,
the time T 1 or the time interval T 1 remains the same. Do you expect it to
2
2
change?
2. For a known resistance, the time T 1 determines the capacitance. Use
2
this to determine first C1 , then C2 and finally the effective capacitance C
with both C1 and C2 in parallel figure 5.10.
Verify the law C = C1 + C2 where C is the effective capacitance of the
combination in parallel. Try this with various resistors R.
3. Use exactly the same method(by measuring T 1 ) to verify the law
2
1
1
1
=
+
+ .........
C
C1 C2
(5.9)
for a set of capacitors in series with a resistor R [Figure 5.11]. Try with
Figure 5.8:
Figure 5.9:
Figure 5.10:
Figure 5.11:
different values of R as well.
4. Charge a set of capacitors connected in series.( Roughly, about 5 times
T 1 will charge the capacitors to the maximum voltage). Measure the voltage
2
across each and establish the law.
C1 V1 = C2 V2 = C3 V3 .........
(5.10)
(5.11)
(in verifying such relations as 2-9,2-10 and 2-11, make sure to measure the
capacitance yourself and not just trust the rated values).
6. With an RC time of around 30sec.,measure the voltage across R as a
function of time while charging and discharging the capacitor. Pay particular attention to the polarity of the voltage across R in each case. It is for
this reason that the voltmeter provided is centrally pivoted one. You would
also notice that with the passage of time the voltage across the resistor goes
on falling until it becomes zero when the capacitor is fully charged or discharged. If you use two voltmeters and measure the voltages across R and C
simultaneously you can also verify that at all instants of time
VR + VC = Vo
(5.12)
5.6
Experiment C
(5.13)
I = Io et/RC
(5.14)
for the discharging circuit. Thus the current follows the same behaviour as
the voltage with time except that its direction is opposite in the two cases.
Connecting the milliammeter in series with the resistor and the capacitor[Figure 5.12, study the behaviour of the current in the two cases [Figure
5.13]
Figure 5.12:
Pay particular attention to the reversing of the current in the circuit.
This is why a centrally pivoted current meter is provided.
Also, if you connect the voltmeter across R, in addition to the reversing
of polarity in the voltage across R, you would discover that the whole of the
voltage appears across it when you commence the charging or the discharging.
Also verify if the maximum current Io at the commencement of the charging
and the discharging is given by
Io =
Vo
R
(5.15)
5.7
VR
R
(5.16)
Experiment D
Vo
IC
(5.17)
You must learn to make approximations like these(VC ' Vo ) and understand why such approximations do not matter when it is only the order of
magnitude of a quantity you are interested in.You should further, be able to
appreciate the difficulty in measurement of VC with a meter of finite resistance and hence the importance of the approximation VC = Vo . However, if
you are interested in knowing the leakage resistance more precisely you may
calculate it as follows:
Vo
R
(5.18)
RC =
IC
Do you see how the approximation involved in Eq.5.17 is taken care of in
Eq.5.18 ?
If a capacitor of 50f and a leakage resistance of 2megaohms, in how much
time will the charged capacitor, left to itself, lose half its charge?
You may now connect the voltmeter across C[figure 5.15 and see how the
leakage resistance RC changes. Try to verify your result by calculation.
5.8
Experiment E
withstand voltages higher than 50 to 60 volts and those which can withstand
higher voltages have lower values for capacitance
Suppose the total resistance in the circuit including that of the connecting
wires is made zero, in what part of the circuit would the energy 21 CV 2 be
dissipated now? How will you modify your above calorimetric measurement
for this case?
Repeating this for the case of discharging, you will find that again an equal
amount of energy is dissipated in the circuit. Since this energy in the case of
discharging comes from the capacitor you can draw a simple conclusion from
these experiments. Of the total energy drawn from the source in charging a
capacitor, half is dissipated in the circuit and half is stored up in the capacitor
irrespective of the value of the resistance. In other words, of the total energy
spent in charging a capacitor you can recover only half of it.
5.9
Experiment F
(5.21)
In fact, the energy dissipated is 21 CV 2 (Appendix II); see, if you can verify
this in all the experiments discussed.
The result that the energy dissipated( 12 CV 2 ) in an RC circuit is independent of R seems strange. Try and see if you can present an argument to
justify this. Discuss this in the limiting cases R0 and R also.
5.10
Experiment E
APPENDIX-I
Capacitors 1.Paper and Other Capacitors
Commercially available capacitors come in various forms for use in simple
networks. A common one is the paper capacitor in which a pair of metal
foils sandwich a thin paper. The whole assembly is then rolled into a bundle,
dipped in wax and sealed against moisture. There may still be some leakage
of charge through the paper particularly if the applied voltage is large. A
practical consideration for a capacitor is always the voltage it can withstand
without breakdown.
The capacitance of the system is somewhat increased when there is a
dielectric( such as paper) between the electrodes. Other dielectrics commonly
used are mica, ceramics and sometimes plastic films.
It can be seen that by reducing the distance between the electrodes one
can increase the capacitance; but one cannot do this indefinitely. For a given
voltage, electrical breakdown(i.e. current through the dielectric) occurs if the
distance is too small. For example, if air is the dielectric and the capacitor
is to withstand 100volts, a separation of at least 1/10 mm is required. The
capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor is given by
A
(5.22)
d
One can see from this relation( the reader is advised to do this arithmetic)
that no more than about 10pico-farad per sq.cm (1 pico-farad =1012 farad)
can be achieved.
2.Electrolytic Capacitors
Some metals like aluminium, when placed in a suitable electrolyte and
made the positive electrode( i.e. aluminium is the positive electrode) from
a thin film (about 106 cm) of oxide. This film has a very high resistance to
a flow of current in one direction(from aluminium towards electrode) and a
very low one in the reverse direction. Thus, provided we use the aluminium
side as the positive one, we can obtain fairly large capacitance, a microfarad per 10cm2 area with this kind of system when the aluminium and the
electrolyte form the two electrodes.
Even smaller film thicknesses can be made so that electrolytic capacitors
can achieve as high as 104 farad for 10cm2 . It is obvious that we cannot use
an electrolytic capacitor with a-c unless we ensure that its polarity would
not change.
C = o
Other limitations are that they have a larger leakage current than the
ordinary capacitors, their life is shorter, their capacitance may change somewhat after a few months( even the values marked on the new ones may vary
by as much as 20%) and the working voltages for these are lower.
In all the circuits wherein these capacitors have been used they are represented as in [figure 5.19], the curved line representing the negative can.
In using these electrolytic capacitors, remember to connect them with the
right polarity and always below the rated voltage of the capacitor.
APPENDIX-II
Analysis of an RC circuit with a source of constant EMF
When a resistor and a capacitor are connected in series to a source of
voltage Vo , we have
Vc + VR = Vo
(5.23)
where Vc and VR are the voltages across C and R. Writing
Vc =
Q
C
(5.24)
and
dq
dt
where q is the charge on the capacitor and I the current, we have
VR = RI = R
(5.25)
q
Vo
dq
+
=
dt RC
R
(5.26)
(5.28)
where A is a constant.
For charging, we assume the initial condition q=0 at t=0 which establishes
the equation
q = qo (1 et/RC )
(5.29)
where we have put qo = CVo
Similarly, for discharging, we set q = qo = CVo at t=0 to give
q = qo et/RC )
(5.30)
The potential across the capacitor(q/C) follows exactly the same dependence on time as the charge.
The current is
dq
qo t/RC
I=
=
e
(5.31)
dt
RC
or
I = Io et/RC
(5.32)
I = Io et/RC
(5.33)
for the discharging circuit. Thus the current follows the same behaviour with
time except that the sign is reversed in the two cases.
When the source charges the capacitor, it does work. This work is simply
Z
W = Vo Idt
(5.34)
since the rate of doing is Vo I. Using equation(2.32), we have
Z
= Vo Io et/RC
W = Vo I
(5.35)
0
qo
since Vo = qCo and Io = RC
This can be written in either of the following forms:
W = CVo2 =
qo2
C
(5.36)
An interesting point to note is this: when the capacitor has been charged
to its full potential Vo , it has an energy 21 CVo2 stored in it. Thus an energy
1
CVo2 has been dissipated while charging in the resistive parts of the circuit.
2
Figure 5.15:
Figure 5.16: R times the shaded area gives the energy dissipated
Figure 5.18:
Figure 5.19:
Figure 5.20:
6.
BH curve tracing
7.
Study of Electromagnetic Induction
7.1
Introduction
The basic principle of generation of alternating emf is electromagnetic induction* discovered by Michael Faraday. This phenomenon is the production of
an induced emf in a circuit(conductor) caused by a change of the magnetic
flux linking the circuit. Faradays law of induction tells us that the induced
emf E is given by
d
(7.1)
E=
dt
where d/dt represents the rate of change of flux linkng the circuit. If you
~ in webers/meter2 , the flux in webers
use mks units, E will be in volts, B
~ in gauss, in
and t in sec. If, on the other hand you use Gaussian units, B
2
guass cm , then Eq.7.1 will read
E=
1 d
c dt
(7.2)
For a discussion of the concept of flux and Faradays law turn to Appendix I. The experiments described in this chapter will further help you to
understand the phenomenon.
7.2
The Apparatus
Figure 7.1:
The two coils are independent and can be connected either in series or in
parallel. The amplitude of the swing can be read from the graduations on
the arc. When the magnet moves through and out of the coil, the flux of the
magnetic field through the coil changes, inducing the emf.
In order to measure this emf, we resort to the now familiar trick of charging a capacitor through a diode and measuring the voltage developed across
the capacitor, at leisure.[figure 7.2].
Figure 7.2:
R represents the coil resistance( about 500ohms) plus the forward resistance of the diode. (If you introduce an additional resistance, that will also
have to be included in R). The capacitors used are in range of 100f and the
charging time RC is of the order of 40msec. It will turn out that this time is
somewhat larger than the time during which the emf in the coil is generated
so that the capacitor does not charge up to the peak value in a single swing
and may take about 10oscillations to do so. This may be checked by the
current meter in the circuit which will tell you when the charging current
ceases to flow.
The peak value of the emf generated may also be measured by using null
method in which one compares the varying emf with a d-c voltage. The
arrangement is shown in figure 7.3. The voltmeter will record a kick if
the voltage across AB(potential divider) is smaller than the peak voltage
developed across the coil so that all that is required is to increase the d-c
voltage until the meter ceases to show any deflection. The part played by the
capacitor is purely nominal. See if there is any difference in the performance
without it.In the experiments, try to measure the induced emf by both the
methods suggested above.
Figure 7.3:
7.3
Experiment A
Figure 7.4: The magnetic field at the coil increases as the magnet approaches
the coil
The magnet is placed at the centre of the arc. As the magnet starts far
away from the coil, moves through it and recedes, the magnetic field through
the coil changes from a small value, increases to its maximum and becomes
small again thus inducing an emf( Appendix I).
The times t1 and t2 in figure 7.5 are the points of inflection of the curve
and in figure 7.6 are obviously a minimum and maximum, respectively.
Remember, this sequence of two pulses, one negative and one positive,
occurs during just half a cycle. On the return swing of the magnet, they will
be repeated. (Which one will be repeated first, the negative or the positive
pulse?)
Consider now the effect of these pulses on the charging circuit of figure
7.2. The diode will conduct only during the positive pulse; at the first half
swing, the capacitor charges up to a potential, say about 0.5Eo . During the
next half swing, the diode will be cut off until the positive pulse reaches
0.5Eo and then the capacitor will be allowed to charge up to a slightly higher
potential. Thus, in a few oscillations the capacitor will be charged up to the
peak value Eo .
The rate of change of flux through the coil is, essentially, proportional to
the velocity of the magnet as it passes through the coil. By choosing different
amplitudes of oscillation of the magnet, we can alter this velocity. Suppose
the angular velocity of the magnet at any point is and the moment of
inertia of the system about the axis of rotation is K. The kinetic energy of
the system is 12 K 2 and the potential energy(referred to the lowest position
of the magnet) is Mgr(1-cos ) where M is mass of the system and r the
distance of the centre of gravity from the point of suspension.
The maximum value max is given by
1
2
Kmax
= M gr(1 coso )
2
(7.3)
or,
2M gr
(1 coso )
(7.4)
K
where 0 is the angular amplitude. In order to eliminate the constants
(Mgr/K) we note that the motion is approximately simple harmonic with
a time period.
Conservation of energy gives
1
K 2 + M gr(1 cos)=constant
2
for small this gives
where we have written for ;
1
1
2
2
K + 2 M gr =constant
2
Differentiating this we obtain
2
max
=
(7.5)
4
o
sin
T
2
(7.6)
o
4
sin
T
2
(7.7)
So
R
(7.8)
Figure 7.7:
7.4
Experiment B
of turns and A the area of the coil, the charge Q is given by Q = CV where
V is the voltage acquired by the capacitor whose capacitance is C. Thus, Q
can be readily measured. Eq(7.10) then will enable you to make a rough
~ .
estimate of Bmax
Try using different resistors R in charging circuit and see how far Eq(7.10)
is obeyed. The change in the flux ought to be the same so that the charge
collected should be smaller the larger the value of R. If you find that the
voltage of the capacitor is too small to be measured for a single swing, you
may average over a small number of oscillations(why only a small number of
oscillations?).
Figure 7.8:
As mentioned in Experiment A , the diode allows the capacitor to charge
only for positive pulse [Figure 7.6]. You may arrange two sets of charging
circuits as in [Figure 7.8] so that one capacitor charges up on the positive
pulse and the other on the negative pulse. Verify that the charges on the
capacitor are nearly the same. (What will the voltages on the capacitor
depend on?)
If you stop the oscillation (by hand) after a quarter oscillation (from the
extreme position of the magnet to its mean position), only one capacitor will
charge up. Try and find out if the sign of the emf induced is as should be
according to Faradays law.
7.5
Experiment C
(7.12)
amplitudes. Again plot log S vs n. You may also connect a finite load such
as a 500ohm resistor and make the same measurements. Finally, try also
a big capacitor, say 2000f, as a load. At each swing the capacitor keeps
charging up and energy has to be supplied to build up this energy as well as
the energy that will be lost through leakage. Try and interpret the graphs
that you obtain in these cases; the case of a capacitative load is somewhat
complicated. (Figure 7.9 shows these curves plotted from experimental data)
APPENDIX-I
Flux Of The Field And Faradays Law
As pointed out at the beginning of this chapter, the concept of flux of the
field is vital to the understanding of Faradays Law.
~ We assign a direction to this element
Consider a small element of area d.
taking it to be the normal to the plane of the area directed such that if it
is bounded by a curve as shown in [Figure 7.10], then the normal comes out
of the plane of the paper towards you, the reader. In other words, it is the
same direction as the movement of the axis of a right handed screw rotated
in the sense of the arrow on the curve.
~ Then
Suppose, now this element of area is situated in a magnetic field B.
the scalar quantity
~ =| B || d | cos()
~ d
d = B
(7.14)
~ where is the angle between the
~ through the area d,
is called the flux of B
~
direction of the magnetic field and the direction assigned to the area d.
~
We can generalize this to define the flux over a finite area S. In doing
~ will not, in general, be
this, we must remember that the magnetic field B
the same at different points within the finite area. We therefore divide up
the area into small pieces, calculate the flux over each piece and integrate.
Thus, the flux is
Z
~
~ d
(7.15)
= B
s
where the symbol s signifies that we are to integrate over the entire area
~
~ out of the integral in Eq.(3.15)
S.[Figure
7.11] Obviously, you cannot take B
~
~
unless B is same everywhere in S.
If the magnetic field at every point changes with time as well, then the
flux will also change with time.
Z
~ d
~
= (t) = B(t).
(7.16)
s
Faradays discovery was that the rate of change of flux d/dt is related to
the work done on taking a unit positive charge around the contour C[Figure
7.11] in reverse direction. This work done is just the emf. Accordingly, we
can state Faradays law in its usual form that the induced emf is given by
E=
d
dt
(7.17)
*** There are, however, a number of situations in which Faradays law would not hold.
For a beautiful discussion, read Feynmans Lectures in Physics, CH 17, Vol. II
APPENDIX-II
Lenzs Law
This law is just the statement of the tendency of a system to resist change
as applied to the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction. Let us understand the origin of the law.
Suppose we have q steady current I in a circular loop as in figure 7.13.
~ associated with this current, the lines of force
Then there is a magnetic field B
going through the face of the coil and out is shown in the figure. The lines o
force close upon themselves outside the coil. (The lines of force representing
~ always close upon themselves). Note particularly the direction of these
B
lines. The way to remember this is to ask yourself how the axis of a right
handed screw, rotated in the direction of the arrow on the coil, will move.
This is the direction of the magnetic field.
Suppose you increase the current. This will increase the magnetic field in
the direction drawn and the flux will increase. But according to Faradays
law this increase in flux will set up an induced emf given by the rate of change
of this flux, i.e.
d
(7.18)
E=
dt
Note the negative sign. This means that the direction of the emf in the coil
will be opposite the sense of rotation of a right handed screw. Thus the
induced emf will try to restore the original current. This is why we have, on
occasion, called it the back emf. If, therefore, the current in the coil has to
be increased, one has to supply energy to overcome this opposing emf.
It is quite easy to see how much energy is required without going into
details of this opposing field. Recall that a coil of self inductance L carrying
a current I has an energy 12 LI 2 . If, therefore, the increased current is Io , the
extra energy to be supplied is 21 LIo2 - 12 LI 2 . You must now be able to argue
why the open circuited coil in Experiment C is damped much less than a
short circuited one.
Figure 7.9:
Figure 7.10:
Figure 7.11:
Figure 7.12:
8.
Determination of Cauchys Contants
8.1
Objective:
Apparatus:
Glass prism, spectrometer and mercury vapour lamp.
8.2
Theory:
Figure 8.1: Top view of the prism table showing relevant details. A - rotation
axis of the prism table. B,C - Threaded screw holes to fix grating stand.
D,E,F - Leveling screws.
A parallel beam of white light from a source (mercury lamp) is passed
through a prism. One would observe a spectrum on the other side of the
prism (Fig.8.3). The prism is then set in the position of minimum deviation
and the angle of minimum deviations corresponding to different colors are
measured with the help of the spectrometer. The refractive index at different
wavelengths can be calculated using the following well known formula:
=
m
sin A0 +D
2
sin A20
Here A0 is the angle of the prism and Dm is the angle of minimum deviation. [Note: The wavelengths of various lines observed in light from mercury
vapour lamp are provided in the laboratory.]
8.3
Experiment:
complete now.
2. Schusters method of focusing a spectrometer for parallel
light:
When a distant object is not available or the spectrometer is too heavy to
be carried outside the dark room where the experiment is being performed,
the setting of the spectrometer is done by the Schusters method. the slit is
kept facing the brightest portion of the mercury lamp and its width adjusted
to permit a thin line of light to act as incident light.
Prism is now kept on the prism table with its ground face along the parallel lines ruled on the prism table. The prism table is rotated so as to obtain
mercury light incident from the collimator on the prism. Telescope arm is
moved to a suitable position to see the spectrum through it. the prism table is rotated to achieve the position of minimum deviation (of course, you
will have to rotate the telescope arm also, as you rotate the prism table, to
retain the spectrum in the field of view of the telescope). At this position,
the spectrum which appeared to be moving in the telescope in one direction
(say left to right) reaches an extreme limit and retraces its path on further
movement of the prism table in the same direction.
Prism table is rotated away from this position of minimum deviation.
bringing the refracting angle towards the telescope and the telescope is now
focused on the image as distinctly as possible. Prism table is then rotated
to the other side of the minimum deviation position towards the collimator
and the collimator is focused to obtain a sharp image of the spectrum. The
process is repeated till the motion of the prism does not affect the focus of
the spectrum (please see Fig.8.3). The collimator and the telescope are then
set for parallel light and their settings are not to be disturbed during the
course of the experiment.
Measurements of angle of minimum deviation Dm and prism angle A0 :
The prism is again set in the position of minimum deviation as discussed
above. Now measure the positions of various lines (colors) of the spectrum
on the circular scale without disturbing the prism table. Now remove the
prism from prism table and rotate the telescope to see the slit directly and
measure its position. The difference between this last reading and the readings corresponding to various colors in the position of minimum deviation
will give us the angles of minimum deviations for different colors.
This given prism is now again placed on the prism table such that the
ground surface is facing towards the telescope and is perpendicular to the
axis of collimator. Adjust the position of the prism such that the edges of
the prism opposite to the ground surface lies approximately along the axis of
the prism table as shown in Fig.8.3. Rotate the telescope arm and measure
the position of reflected images of the slit on both sides of incident beam.
The difference between the two readings is equal to angle 2A0 .
8.4
Observations:
D2 = R 2
A0 =
ab
2
Calculations:
Sr.
No.
Color
Dm =
D1 +D2
2
A0 +Dm
2
A
sin 20
sin
1/2
Using the above values draw a graph between and 1/2 and determine
A and B.
Precautions: Care should be taken to ensure proper setting of the spectrometer. It should be ensured that the settings of the telescope and collimator are not touched during the course of taking the various readings.
Source of errors: Think and find out yourself after doing the experiment.
9.
Millikans oil drop experiment
9.
Millikans oil drop experiment
9.1
Objective:
To determine the total charge on an oil drop and estimate the value of elementary charge of an
electron.
9.2
Theory:
If electrically charged oil droplets (or small drops) are made freely fall through air in presence of
an externally applied electric field E such that the field forces the droplets move opposite to the
direction of free motion downwards, one can calculate the total charge on the droplet. By doing
these measurements on the same drop a few times and repeating on many drops, one is able to
estimate the value of the elementary charge of an electron.
Consider a spherical drop of radius r and material density . The weight of the drop is given by
4 3
r g
3
(1)
Where g is the gravitational acceleration. In air (density = air) the drops falls downwards due to
gravity. The apparent weight of the drop can be written as
Wa
4 3
r ( air ) g
3
(2)
Now, for a drop that is moving in a medium, there acts a drag force that is opposite to the direction
of motion. The magnitude of the drag force keeps increasing with the speed in the forward
direction. For a drop falling under gravity, there comes a situation when the drag force balances
the weight and there is no net force on the drop. In that case the drops falls freely with a constant
velocity v1 downwards called the terminal velocity. If is the viscosity of the air (fluid) then
according to Stokes law, drag force on the drop is given by the relation,
Fd 6rv1
(3)
Since for the freely falling drop, Fd = Wa, we can derive an expression relating the radius of the
drop to the terminal velocity v1 given as
r2
9v1
2 g ( air )
(4)
Stokes law, however, becomes incorrect when the velocity of fall of the droplets is very small
(less than 0.1 cm/sec). Since the velocities of the droplets used in the current experiments will be
much smaller than 0.1 cm/sec, the viscosity must be corrected by multiplying by a correction
factor. The resulting effective viscosity that should be used is given by
eff 1
b
,
P r
(5)
where parameter b is a constant (typical value ~ 8.2 10-3 Pascal) and P is the atmospheric
pressure. Solving Eqs. (4) and (5) together for the radius of the drop we obtain
(b / 2 P) 2 9v1 / 2 g ( air ) (b / 2 P )
(6)
Now, an electric field is applied such that it can counter the downward force, i.e., the weight of
the drop. Assuming that the charge on the oil drop is q and electric field E is applied between to
charging plates kept at potential difference V and distance d between them. Clearly, for a specific
value of the electric field, the electrical force FE = qE = qV/d on the drop just balances the weight,
i.e., FE = Wa. In this situation, one would observe that the oil drop remains steady. Because of the
practical problems in determining the exact weight of the oil drop and the electric force, it is
recommended that the electrical force upwards is slightly higher than the weight so that the action
of the Stokes law can be brought in because the oil drop starts moving upwards. Due the drag
force, the upward movement quickly attains a terminal velocity v2. In this situation, from the force
balance equation, one can write
FE Wa 6rv2
(7)
After simplification, we get the following expression for the electrical charge on the oil drop,
v d 4 3
q 1 2
r ( air )
v
V
3
1
(8)
To determine the elementary charge e on an electron, it must be the case that the oil drop has
charge q that is integer multiples of e. Therefore, for the estimation of e, measurements on
many drops should be carried out. Various values of the charges (q1, q2, q3, .) and a little bit of
calculus will help determine the value of e.
9.3
Experimental setup
The complete setup is shown in Fig. 1. The various parts include (a) atomizer, (b) oil drop spray
chamber, (c) drift chamber, (d) imaging assembly, (e) LED source, (f) the main control panel, and
(g) computer.
A closer view of the drift chamber is shown in Fig. 2. In this section, the oil drops are imaged
using the CCD camera by shining light from a LED source and in the presence of an electric field
applied between two charging plates.
Figure 3 describes various control switches/knobs and displays of the control panel. Figure 4
display the procedure of attaching the positive charging plate into the drift chamber.
9.4
Experimental procedure
The CCD camera assembly provided in the experimental set up as described above is used for
observing the movement of the oil droplets between the two charging plates with the help of an
imaging software in the computer. This helps to measure the approximate size of the oil drops and
also their velocities while falling down under gravity and moving against it in absence and in
presence of an applied electric field, respectively. The potential difference between the plates can
be controlled and monitored between 0 to 2 KV. The following procedure will help in performing
the measurements.
Power up the system including the computer and the main control panel.
Turn on temperature, LED and voltage control switches. The displays for the temperature
and the voltage should start displaying the current values of the temperature and voltage.
Keep the atomizer in the upright position (vertically standing) on the table and only then
apply pressure by pressing the nozzle cap.
Press the nozzle cap a few times to generate good pressure inside the atomizer.
Give a small puff of oil drops through the hole in the spraying chamber using atomizer and
wait (few minutes) for some drops to appear on the screen. It is quite easy to get nice spray
of very small drops if the above mentioned steps are done properly.
The LED intensity should be kept at bare minimum only to observe the droplets in the screen.
Observe the drops on the screen of the software panel. Increase the value of the voltage in
steps and dont jump to very high values. It is recommended that experiments are done at
voltages below 1 kV. Once you select a voltage, say 0.3 kV using the variable power supply
at the front panel, notice if some drops have stopped falling down and started moving
upwards as soon as the chamber plate charger knob is pressed.
If no drop is seen moving upwards in the presence of the electric field then increase the
voltage on the plate from 0.3 to 0.35 kV and repeat the above method. You may need to
repeat this a few times until you find some drops moving upwards.
Select one drop which started moving upwards. For this drop, take multiple measurements
for the time taken in freely falling a fixed distance under gravity and time taken in traveling
a fixed distance upwards in the presence of the electric field. You can use your own timer or
a timer provided in the software.
The lid/cover of the spray chamber should be removed for cleaning only when the system is
off.
LED should not be operated at high intensity for more than 2 minutes. Start and try to perform
the whole experiment at low intensity.
The imaging software is already calibrated for measuring the distances travelled by the
droplets. Generally, travel distance of 1 mm is good enough.
Avoid applying voltages more than 1.5 kV. This is not good for the capacitors inside.
One spray (or maximum two) is enough to perform the whole experiment.
One needs to take multiple measurements (at least three) on a single drop.
Measurements on multiple drops (5 to 10) have to be taken.
From the values of the electrical charge on the drops, you should find the common factor
among all those such that the amount of charge is only an integral multiple of this factor.
This is the elementary charge on the electron.
After completing the measurements, ensure that the LED intensity and the voltage levels
have been returned to the minimum before you switch off the device.
Ensure that the working area is neat and clean all the time.
Ensure, the spray chamber and the drift chamber including the charging plate are cleaned up
thoroughly before and after the experiments.
The control panel and every other accessory should not be moved from its original place.
The instruments should be handled very carefully and gently.
For any mishandling of the instrument and its parts, the student will be penalized.
9.5
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Observations
Temperature of the chamber in oC :
Viscosity of air at above temperature :
Density of air air at the above temperature :
Density of oil drop :
Acceleration due to gravity g :
Atmospheric pressure P :
Distance between the charging plates d :
1
2
3
.
.
Drop 2
1
.
Drop 3
.
Drop 4
.
9.6
Calculations
(a) Determination of q
Drop 1:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
v d 4 3
q 1 2
r ( air ) =
v1 V 3
Drop 2:
(b) Determination of e
Drop number
1
q2
q3
Analysis:
10.
To determine the wavelength of
light from a Sodium Lamp by
Newtons rings method.
10.1
THEORY
(10.1)
(10.2)
As the system is axially symmetric the resulting fringes are concentric circles
with the center at the point of contact. If R is the radius of curvature of the
curved surface of the lens, it can be shown from geometry that the diameter
of the nth dark ring is given by,
Dn2 = 4 t (2R) = 4nR
(10.3)
(10.4)
i.e.
2
Dn+m
Dn2
(10.5)
4mR
Thus measuring the diameter of the rings and the radius of curvature of the
lens, we can find the wavelength of the light used.
PROCEDURE:
1. Clean both surfaces of the lens and glass plate with a tissue paper and
ensure that there is no fingerprint or grease on either. Place the curved
surface of the lens on the glass plate. Check that this is correct by gently
pressing on one edge of the lens, it should rock because of the curved surface
being in contact. Place this assembly in the frame supplied and slightly
tighten the screws to ensure that the lens will not fall but can move slightly
if needed. Make sure that you do not over-tighten the screws as this may
break the lens or the glass plate.
2. Hold the lens-plate assembly horizontal while standing below any light
on the ceiling of the laboratory. A circular pattern of interference fringes
(1-2 mm dia.) should be visible in the light reflected from the assembly. If
no fringes are visible then the glass surfaces have not been cleaned properly.
If the fringes are very irregular in shape then the flat and not the convex
surface of the lens is in contact with the plate.
3. The frame containing the lens and plate is then placed in the Newtons
rings apparatus so that the fringes are directly below the microscope. The
microscope is then moved vertically until the fringes can be seen. If necessary,
one of the three screws on the frame can also be tightened slightly to tilt the
lens and ensure that the fringes are centered.
4. At this stage, the central fringe should be dark if this is not so, then
the plate and lens are not clean, take them out, clean them and perform the
same procedure as above. To ensure maximum contrast, move the Newtons
ring apparatus of the lens in front of the lamp till the other dark fringes are
also as black as possible.
5. Find the vernier constant of the traveling microscope. Then using the
micrometer, move the microscope in the horizontal direction and check that
it can be moved to more than 25 dark and bright fringes on either side of the
center for taking readings.
6. Counting carefully from the center move out till the cross wire is on the
21st fringe or 22nd bright fringe. Now rotate the micrometer in the opposite
direction till the 20th ..fringe of the same type is tangential to the cross-wire.
Note the position of the traveling microscope from the micrometer.
The 21st fringe must not be used as reversing the direction of the screw
there gives a large backlash error.
7. Move the microscope using the micrometer to align the cross-wire tangential to the 18th fringe and note the micrometer reading. Repeat this on
the 16th , 14th , 12th .... fringes, continue in the same fashion on the other side
of the center till the 20th
8. Remove the plano convex lens and plate from the frame and lay the lens
with the flat surface downwards. Raise the central screw of the spherometer
and place the spherometer on the convex surface of the lens. Rotate the screw
until the tip just touches the lens and note the reading on the spherometer.
Now without disturbing the reading, lift the spherometer and place it on the
flat glass plate. Again lower the screw till it touches the plate and note the
new reading. Repeat this process two or there times and obtain the mean
value of h: which is the difference of the two readings.
9. In order to measure l the distance between any two legs of the spherometer, press the spherometer down on your notebook so that the three legs
make marks on it. Trace out the triangle thus made by the spherometer,
measure all the three sides and take the mean. Use this h and l to find the
radius of curvature R of the lens by the formula.
R=
h
l2
+
6h 2
(10.6)
Observations:
Least count of micrometer on microscope =
Pitch (least count of main scale) of spherometer =
Least count of vernier (circular) scale of spherometer =
Table 10.1: Measurement of the diameter of the fringes
Serial
No.
No. of Ring
n
1.
2.
3.
20
18
16
:
:
Microscope Reading
Left hand side Right hand side
Diameter = Dn =
|left hand side right hand
side|
Calculations:
2
Dn+10
(m = 10)
Dn2
2
2
Dn+m
Dn
4mR
Serial
No.
1
2
3
Spherometer
Circular scale
reading on
lens
Spherometer
Circular scale
reading on
plate
Difference
of the two
circular scale
readings
m
Number of
complete
rotations
moved
n
h=
n(pitch) +
m(least count
of circular
scale)
(Calculate the maximum possible error and report the result as below)
The wavelength of light from the Sodium lamp was found to be = d
nm.
3. What will you observe if white light is used in this experiment instead
of sodium lamp?
11.
Determination of Plancks constant
THEORY:
The basic idea is that the photon energy (E ), which by Einsteins relation is E h is equal
to the energy gap (Eg ) between the valence and conduction bands of the diode. The energy gap,
in turn, is equal to the height of the energy barrier, eVo that the electrons have to overcome to
go from the n-doped side of the diode junction to the p-doped side when no external voltage V
is applied to the diode. In the p-doped side, they recombine with holes releasing the energy Eg
as photons with Eg E eVo . Thus, a measurement of Vo indirectly yields E and Plancks
Constant if is known or measured. However, there are practical and conceptual problems in
the actual measurement. Let us consider the LED diode equation:
Vo
V
I 9 exp
exp
1
(1)
Vt
Vt
where,
V Vm RI
kT
Vt e
k Boltzmann Constant
T Absolute temperature
e electronic charge
Vm is the voltmeter reading in the external diode circuit and R is the contact resistance. The
constant is the material constant, which depends on the type of diode, location of recombination region etc. The energy barrier eVo is equal to the gap energy Eg when no external voltage
V is applied. The quantities which are constant in a LED are impurity atom density, the charge
diffusion properties and the effective diode area. The one in rectifier is negligible if I 2 nA,
and the equation becomes
pV Vo q
I 9 exp
Vt
e pV Vo q
(2)
9 exp
kT
A direct method could be to apply a small voltage to the LED and increasing it till the LED
turns ON. This turning ON could be detected by visually observing the light emission. Plotting
threshold voltage vs. frequency of peak light output (obtained from LED datasheets) provides
the value of he . The visual observation of the emission onset is quite vague though. Use of
photo-multiplier is sometimes suggested for this purpose but working with it raises maintenance
problems and it is quite costly. Alternately, a measurement of threshold current ( 1011
A) through the LED may be attempted but it is difficult and not entirely accurate due to
inefficiencies of actual LEDs.
Another procedure, sometimes used, is to draw a tangent to the I V characteristics of the
diode and obtain its intercept. This procedure may give reasonably good results if the tangents
to the I V characteristics of the diodes are drawn at the same current. The method then really
becomes equivalent to measuring voltage across the LEDs at a single current. The intercepts
of the tangent are, except for an additive constant, identical to diode voltages. The additive
constant may be eliminated by considering data from different LEDs. However, the bulk of
data collected from the original I V graph becomes irrelevant. A basic drawback of these
methods is the assumption that the barrier height Vo is constant and is equal to the energy gap
1
divided by the electronic charge (i.e., eg ), which is true only when electric potential V is small
E
or less than eg . Further, this method assumes that the material constant, , is unity which is
not correct.
The present method is free from these drawbacks. The height of potential barrier is obtained
by directly measuring the dependence of diode current on the temperature keeping the applied
voltage and thus, the height of the barrier is fixed. The external voltage is kept fixed at a value
lower than the barrier. In our experimental set-up, the variation of current I with temperature
is measured over a range of about 30 at a fixed voltage V ( 1.8 V) kept slightly below Vo .
o V q
The slope of lnpIq vs 1{T curve gives epVk
. The constant may be determined separately
from I V characteristics of the diode at room temperature rom the relation
e V
(3)
kT
lnpIq
The Plancks constant is then obtained using the relation
h
eVo
c
(4)
The contact resistance of LED is usually around 1 , while overall internal resistance of LED
at applied voltage (1.8 V) is few hundred ohms. The factor RI in expression V Vm RI may,
therefore, be neglected.
The value of Plancks constant obtained from this method is within 5% of accepted value
(6.626 1034 Joules.sec).
EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP
The set-up consists of following units:
1. Variable Voltage Source
Specifications:
Range : 0-2 V DC
Resolution : 1 mV
Accuracy : 0.5%
Display : 3 21 LED DPM
2. Current Meter
Specifications:
Range : 0-20 mA/2000A
Resolution : 10 A /1A
Display : 3 12 LED DPM
3. Temperature Controlled Oven
Specifications:
Range : Ambient to 60 C
Resolution : 0.1 C
Sensor : PT-100
Display : 3 12 LED DPM
Figure 1: Set-up
OBSERVATIONS:
(a) Determination of material constant
Sample: (RED/YELLOW) LED
Room Temperature: 300 K
Sr. No.
Junction Voltage, V
(V)
Forward Current, I
A
lnpIq
V
e
1
kT
slope
lnpIq
From graph,
Temperature
( C)
lnpIq
T 1
Therefore,
Vo V lnpIq
T 1
Now,
h eVco
h
Temperature
(K)
K
e
Joules.sec
Current
mA
103
(K1 )
1{T
lnpIq
(I in mA)
CHECK POINTS:
1. V I characteristic of LED should be drawn at very low current ( up to 1000A only),
so that disturbance to Vo is minimum.
2. In T I mode, make sure that the oven switch is OFF and Set Temperature knob is at
minimum position before connecting the oven.
3. On each setting of temperature, please allow sufficient time for the temperature to stabilize
(between 6-7 minutes).
SUGGESTED READING:
1. Neamen, Donald A. Semiconductor physics and devices. McGraw-Hill Higher Education,
2003.
2. Sze, Simon M., and Kwok K. Ng. Physics of semiconductor devices. John wiley & sons,
2006.
12.
Diffraction grating
OBJECT
To determine the wavelengths of light emitted by a mercury vapour lamp
by using a diffraction grating.
INTRODUCTION:
Consider a light beam transmitted through an aperture in an opaque screen
(see Fig. 12.1). If light were treated as rays traveling in straight lines, then
the transmitted light would appear as a bright shadow of the aperture.
However, because of the wave nature of light, the transmitted pattern may
deviate slightly or substantially from the aperture shadow. depending on the
distance between the aperture and the observation plane, the dimensions of
the aperture and the wavelength of light. Indeed, the transmitted intensity
distribution, which is known as the diffraction pattern, may contain intensity
maxima and minima even well outside the aperture shadow (see Fig. 12.1).
The angles at which the intensity maxima and the minima occur depends
on the wavelength of light and the width of the slit. This phenomenon of
spreading out of light waves into the geometrical (dark) shadow when light
passes through a small aperture (or about an obstacle) is known as diffraction.
A diffraction grating consists of a periodic array of a large number of
equidistant slits of width b which are separated by a distance a as shown
in Fig. 12.3. The period (= a) is known as the grating constant. Thus if N
is the number of slits per unit length (say, 1 mm), then a = I/N mm
The diffraction pattern due to a grating is essentially the same as the
diffraction pattern due to M slits, where M is a large number ( 103 ) and is
obtained by the superposition of waves emanating from all the slits on the
observation plane. The resulting intensity distribution is given by
2
2
sin M
sin
(12.1)
I = I0
sin
where
kb sin
ka sin
and =
(12.2)
2
2
with k = 2
, being the wavelength of light and is the angle at which the
(12.3)
(12.4)
When = n, where n is an integer, all diffracted waves in the corresponding direction n are in phase, and their amplitudes add up to give maximum
intensity. Thus, we have the grating equation, which gives the positions of
the intensity maxima as
a sin n = n
(12.5)
A three way spirit level is kept on the prism table with its edge along the
parallel lines.
Figure 12.4: Top view of the prism table showing relevant details
Figure 12.7:
and C, in Fig.4).
The position of the telescope is carefully adjusted such that the direct
image of the slit coincides with the vertical crosswire on the telescope. Readings of the two circular scales I & II are recorded. The telescope arm is
rotated through 90 , and locked in this new position. The prism table is
rotated so as to coincide image of the slit reflected from the grating with the
vertical crosswire in the telescope (see Fig.7). Readings of scales I and II are
recorded again. The prism table is now rotated away from this position by
Order of
Spectrum
2
1
Color of
light
Yellow
Green
Violet
Yellow
Green
Violet
LHS reading
for telescope
position
(p)
RHS reading
for telescope
position
(q)
pq
(deg)
= |pq|
2
(deg)
*The direction of the arrow indicates the sequence of recording the readings.
Precautions:
i Care should be taken to ensure proper setting of the spectrometer and
these settings of the telescope and the collimator are not touched during
the course of taking the various readings.
ii The position of the grating adjusted to be normal to the incoming light
from the collimator, should not be distrubed throughout the experiment.
Ensure that the prism table locking screw is tightened properly.
iii It is necessary to point the slit towards the brightest part of the source,
in order to obtain reasonable intensity of the lines of different colours
especially in the higher order spectra. It is known that the intensity of
lines in the higher order spectra reduces sharply with increase tn order.
Sources of error:
Think and find out yourself after doing the experiment!!
13.
Brewster angle measurement
14.
(A). To determine the surface
tension of water by Jeagers method.
(B). To measure surface tension
of water by capillary rise method.
Experiment 14(S)
14.1
14.1.1
Apparatus:
14.1.2
Theory:
It is well known that in curved liquid surfaces the surface tension gives rise
to excess pressure P which is given by the relation P = T ( r11 r12 ) where T
is surface tension of the liquid, r1 and r2 are the principal radii of curvature.
This excess pressure is always directed towards the center of curvature and
for an air bubble it is given by P = 2T /r. Jeagers method for measurement
14.1.3
Procedure:
Figure 14.1:
14.1.4
Observations:
Density of liquid =
Ambient temperature=
Table for measuring H and h
Sr.
meniscus water
h
No.
in A
surface
A
1.
2.
3.
.
.
meniscus water
in B
surface
B
(H-h) in
cm
Sr.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
.
position
of
one end of
capillary
vertical
vertical
horizontal
horizontal
position
of
diametrically
opposite end
diameter
(cm)
radius
(cm)
Mean r=
Calculations and Log errors
Result: The surface tension of the liquid at C is =
14.2
14.2.1
Apparatus:
14.2.2
Theory:
When we dip a capillary tube vertically inside a liquid which wets it, the
liquid immediately rises inside the capillary above the general level of the
liquid outside. If h is the maximum height to which it rises then the surface
tension of the liquid is given by the relation
r g
T = r(h + )
3 2
where r is the radius of the bore of capillary, is the density of liquid. In the
above given relation, the angle of contact has been taken as zero, a condition
which is reasonably justified for light liquids like water. Thus we see from
the above equation that by knowing r, , g and h, one can determine surface
tension T of liquid.
Figure 14.2:
14.2.3
Procedure:
Take a beaker and fill it with water approximately half of the height. Now
dip a capillary inside the water and hold the capillary in the vertical direction
by the help of a stand. Wait until water rises inside the capillary to a
maximum height. Next focus the microscope on the meniscus of water inside
the capillary and adjust the microscope such that horizontal cross wire just
coincides with the meniscus and note the reading on vertical scale. Now
move the microscope downwards and note the position of the general level
of water in the beaker. The difference between the two readings gives height
h. Measure the radius of capillary as described earlier in the previous part
of this experiment and calculate T using he equation given above. Repeat
the experiment with different capillaries of different radii and find out the
average values of T.
14.2.4
Observations:
Density of liquid=
Radius of capillary tube=
Observation table for measurement of h
Sr.
position of meniscus in the position of water level in the
No.
capillary
beaker
1.
2.
3.
.
.
Mean h=
Calculation and log errors
Result: The surface tension of the liquid at C is =
height
(cm)
15.
To determine the viscosity of water by Meyers oscillating disk
method
Experiment 14(V)
Theory
If a disk undergoes torsional oscillations about its symmetry axis in a fluid
medium, it does not push aside any additional fluid while executing this
motion. The fluid in contact with the disk then remains at rest with respect to
it, while the fluid far away is at rest with respect to the enclosure/container.
so a transverse velocity gradient is set up in the fluid, and this in turn causes
a viscous force to act and damp out the oscillations. Oscar Meyer suggested
measuring the decay of these oscillations to find the viscosity of a liquid.
The equation to a harmonic oscillator undergoing torsional oscillations is.
I
d2
d
+
K
+ = 0.
dt2
dt
(15.1)
2t
T
2t
KT
sin(
+ ), =
, T = 2I
T
4
1
2
K4
! 21
(15.2)
16I 2
=
T (r4 + 2r3 d)2
"
2 #2
0
0
+
(15.4)
Here,
I - moment of inertia of the torsional pendulum about the suspension axis.
T - time period for one complete oscillation.
r - radius of the disk.
d - thickness of the disk.
- density of the liquid.
- logarithmic decrement in the liquid.
0 - logarithmic decrement in air.
The quantities mentioned above can all be measured directly, except the
moment of intertia of the disk which is a complex object. To find the moment
of inertia, the time period (T) of the disk in air is found and then a ring with
H
Figure 15.2: Meyers Apparatus
a known moment of inertia Ir is placed on the disk with its center on the
suspension axis. The time period of the disk and the ring together in air(T)
is again found, when the moment of inertia of the ring-loaded disk is I + It .
Then, we have
Ir = ma2
T = 2
! 21
2
4
12
I
=
I = ma2
and
T2
(T 0 )2 T 2
0
T =
I + Ir
(15.5)
12
(15.6)
here, m is the mass, a is the average radius of the ring, i.e., a = (d1 + d2 )/4
where d1 and d2 are the inner and outer diameters of the ring, respectively.
Using equations (4) and.(6) we can find the viscosity of water.
PROCEDURE
1. The apparatus consists of a flat disk attached to a short rod passing
through its center which is suspended (with the disk remaining horizontal)
found by using these readings and Eq.(3) for 20 oscillations (i.e., for n=20)
as,
1
B1 C1 + B2 C2
0 =
ln
(15.7)
40
B41 C41 + B42 C42
In general, if n is the number of oscillations, then the logarithmic decrement
is the given by
1
B1 C1 + B2 C2
0 =
ln
(15.8)
2n
B2n+1 C2n+1 + B2n+2 C2n+2
Repeat the procedure for 30 and 40 oscillations to calculate 0 . Take the
mean value of 0 to obtain the logarithmic decrement.
6. A clean glass dish is now placed so as to contain the disk, and water is
poured into it so as to cover the disk but not submerge the mirror (see Fig.2).
The equilibrium position of the light spot is now adjusted (if necessary)
so that it again lies at the center of the scale. The same procedure (as
that to find the logarithmic decrement in air) is now repeated to find the
logarithmic decrement in water. Since the oscillations in this case are very
much damped, the experiment has to be performed for smaller number of
oscillations.
Tabulate the observation for air and water as shown in Table 1
and Table 2.
7. Using the data measured above, and the dimensions of the disk equation
(4) is used to find the viscosity of water. The temperature of the water used
must be measured and quoted along with the result.
Observations:
Least count of vernier caliper used =
Least count of stop watch =
Least count of balance used =
Radius of the disk, r =
Thickness of the disk, d =
Outer diameter of the ring, d1 =
Serial no.
of oscillation
Start
(i= 1)
n = 20
(i = 41)
Start
(i= 1)
n = 30
(i = 61)
Start
(i= 1)
n = 40
(i = 31)
Maximum Amplitude
Left(Bi Ci ) Right(Bi+ )Ci+1 )
0
{using Eq.(8)}
Serial No.
of oscillation
Start
( i= 1)
n=5
(i = 11)
Start
(i= 1)
n = 10
(i = 21)
Start
(i= 1)
n = 15
(i = 31)
Maximum Amplitude
Left (Bi Ci ) Right (Bi+1 Ci+1 )
{using Eq.(8)}
Calculate the maximum probable error d and write down the precautions
and sources of error.
Result:
The viscosity of water was found to be
degrees centigrade.
poise, at a temperature of