100% found this document useful (2 votes)
811 views

API RP Q1 Interpretations

No, having the machinist perform in-process inspection of their own work would not meet the requirements of 5.7.7.3 for final inspection and testing. While 5.7.7.2 allows for in-process inspection to be performed by the person doing the work, 5.7.7.3 has additional requirements for final inspection and testing to help ensure objectivity and independence. Specifically, 5.7.7.3 requires that final inspection and testing be performed by "personnel other than those who performed the work". Even if the components could be considered a "finished product" based on the purchase order, allowing the original machinist to perform the final inspection of their own work would not satisfy the

Uploaded by

Mr. Engineer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
811 views

API RP Q1 Interpretations

No, having the machinist perform in-process inspection of their own work would not meet the requirements of 5.7.7.3 for final inspection and testing. While 5.7.7.2 allows for in-process inspection to be performed by the person doing the work, 5.7.7.3 has additional requirements for final inspection and testing to help ensure objectivity and independence. Specifically, 5.7.7.3 requires that final inspection and testing be performed by "personnel other than those who performed the work". Even if the components could be considered a "finished product" based on the purchase order, allowing the original machinist to perform the final inspection of their own work would not satisfy the

Uploaded by

Mr. Engineer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Doc

Q1

Edition
9th

Section
3.1.6/
5.6.1.1

Question
Answer
InarecentAPIQ1audit,myauditorinterpretedAPISpecQ1,
No.APISpecQ1doesnotspecifythatanauditormakesthe
Section3.1.6tomeanthatthedistributorsupplyingplasticshrink determinationofproductcriticality.APISpecQ1,Section5.6.1.1.astates,
wrapmaterialisacriticalsupplier(thusneedingaQMS
inpart,thatthe[Organizations]procedure shalladdressdetermination
complianttoISO9001).HebasedthisonthefactthatAPI5CRA ofthecriticalityofactivitiesorproducts.Subsequently,theorganization
requirestheshrinkwraptobe0.008"thick(seesection14.3.1). wouldberesponsibleforensuringthatthatprocedureiseffectively
AlthoughwespecifiedthethicknessonourPOandthevendor implemented;and,theauditorwouldberesponsibleforauditingthelevel
ofconformitytotheorganizationsimplementationofitsestablished
certifiedthethicknessonhisshippingpapers,becausehewas
notonourApprovedVendorListasacriticalvendorandaudited procedure.
ashavingaqualitysystemcomplianttoISO,thiswasconsidered
afindingintheaudit.Myquestionis,"Isthisconsistentwiththe
committee'sintention?"Becausetheshrinkwrapismoreofa
commodityitem,andwascertifiedascompliant,andhasnever
contributedtoanonconformance;Iwouldhaveneverclassified
thisvendorascritical.Instead,basedonapanelofexpertsin
supplymanagementourresourcesarebestfocusedonthe
criticalfewsuppliersthatimpactourqualitysuchasrawmaterial
vendors,testhouses,outsourcingheattreat,etc.andnotthe
trivialmanylikeashrinkwrapsupplier.

Q1

9th

3.1.21

Question:Isproductmaintenance,adjustment,repair,and/oronNo.Thetermapplicableproductspecificationappliesonlyto
siteinstallationconsideredtobeservicingonlywheninstallation installation....inthephraseonsiteinstallationwheninstallationisrequired
isrequiredbyapplicableproductspecifications?
byapplicableproductspecification.Clause5.7.1.2aspecifiesservicingto
includereviewandimplementationoftheorganizations,customer
specific,productservicing,andotherservicingrequirements.Therefore,
servicingmaybeapplicableasmandatedbycompanyprocedure,contract
orathirdparty,aswell.

Q1

9th

4.4

Question:WhenAPIproductorotherexternalspecification
requirements,includingaddenda,errataandupdatesareusedin
thedesignormanufactureofproduct,theorganizationshall
maintainadocumentedprocedurefortheintegrationofthese
requirementsintotheproductrealizationprocessandanyother
affectedprocesses.Whenweuseexternalspecification(ex:
ASTM,ASME,etc.)asworkingmethodreferenceinour
procedure,doweneedtoalwaysupdated(uselatestone)?

No.APIQ1,Section4.4.3states,Documentsofexternaloriginshallbe
controlledtoensurethattherelevantversionsareusedandmaintained.
NOTE:Useofaspecificeditionofanexternalorreferencedocumentcan
bebasedoncontractualobligationsorAPI/industryproductspecifications.

Q1

9th

4.4

Q1

9th

4.4

Q1

9th

4.4.4

Q1

9th

5.1.2b

Question:Whenourprocedureuseexternaldocumentnot
update(2yearbackbeforenewone)andthelatestrevisionhas
nonegativeimpactchangestoourprocedure,doesitviolate
clause4.4.4?
Question:HasAPIsetyearlimitationforupdatesexternal
specification?

No.NOTE:Participationincertificationorlicensingprogramsmay
requireuseofcurrentorthemostuptodatereferencedocuments.
Checkprogramrulesforspecificrequirementsforrelevanceofthespecific
documenteditions.
ThisisnotarequirementthatisaddressedbyAPISpecQ1.Required
updatestoexternalspecificationsmaybestipulatedbycustomer
requirementsorbyrequirementsidentifiedin3rdpartycertificationor
licensingprograms.
Background:APIQ1inSection4.4.4requiresWhenAPIproduct Thisquestioncannotbeanswered.SpecQ1doesnotaddressmonogram
orotherexternalspecificationrequirements,includingaddenda, requirements.However,totheextentthattheproductrealization
errata,andupdates,areusedinthedesignormanufactureofthe processincludesproductspecificationrequirementsthatmaybe
product,theorganizationshallmaintainadocumented
applicabletothemonogramprogram,theserequirementsmustbe
procedurefortheintegrationoftheserequirementsintothe
includedintheinternalaudit
productrealizationprocessandanyotheraffectedprocesses
andSection6.2.2.1requiresTheorganizationshallidentifythe
auditcriteria,scope,frequency,andmethodstoensurethatall
processesofthequalitymanagementsystemclaiming
conformitytotherequirementsofthisspecificationareaudited
atleastevery12months.
Question:Isthistobeinterpretedthatcompanieswith
MonogramsmustincludetheapplicableProductSpecaspartof
theirInternalAudits?

Question:Wehavenumerousproprietarylicense
Yes.Butperthedefinitionoflegalrequirements(3.1.13,Obligation
agreements/contractsaswellasAPImonogramlicenses.As
imposedonanorganization,includingthosethatarestatutoryor
thesearemandatedlegalrequirementsfortheproduct(s),isthis regulatory),theexamplesprovidedmayonlybepartofalargerlistof
acceptableevidencetofulfilltherequirementsof5.1.2.b?
documentsthatarerequiredtomeetthisclause.

Q1

9th

5.7.1.5

Question:PurchasedmaterialsWhenmaterialssuchas
forgingsandwroughtmaterialsarepurchasedfromsteel
manufacturers(whoperformtheheattreatmentandinsome
casesNDT),isitarequirementofAPISpecQ1,9thEdition,
Section5.7.1.5forthelicenseetoalsovalidatethesteel
manufacturersprocesscontrolsforprocessesrequiring
validation?

No.Basedontheinformationprovided,thisisapurchaseissueand
thereforeallthatisrequiredisverificationofthattheproductmeetsthe
contractrequirementsonreceipt(5.6.3).Outsourcing(5.6.1.6)and
validation(5.7.1.5)donotapplysincetheproductrequirementsdonot
expectthattheorganizationperformtheforgingactivityitself,butsimply
touseforgedproduct.Therefore,byextension,validationofthose
processessuchasforgingdoesnotapply.
Notehowever,thatvalidationofasuppliersprocessesislikelytobe
requiredintwocases:
a)Whenthisisincludedintheprocessoftheinitialqualificationofa
criticalsupplierper5.6.1.2andforreevaluation(optionally)per5.6.1.4;or
b)Whentheactivitydoesbecomeoneofoutsourcing(Section5.6.1.6),i.e.
thesupplierisperformingtheactivityonbehalfoftheorganizationwhen
suchanactivityisrequiredbytheproductspecorotherobligation
(contract).

Q1

9th

5.7.1.5

Background:Apipemillwasauditedrecentlyandthemillwas Yes,butonlywhentheapplicable[product]specificationdoesnot
makingAPI2BpipesandAPI5Lpipesandmonogrammingthose explicitlyidentifytheNDTprocessasonethatrequiresvalidation.
pipes.Duringverificationofvalidationofprocesses,asper
NOTEBasedonthelimitedinformationprovidedinthebackground,
5.7.1.5ofAPIQ1,Ninthedition,Nondestructivetesting(NDT)
validationofNDTprocedures(forconformancetoAPIQ1,5.7.1.5)maynot
processesweretakenforsampling.Documentedprocedurefor beapplicabletoAPI5Lsincethisdocumentdoesidentifyprocesses
validatingthecurrentNDTprocedureswasrequested.The
requiringvalidation(seeAPI5L,Section8.2)andNDTisnotlistedtherein.
However,thevalidationofNDTprocessesandevidenceofconformanceto
OrganizationdemonstratedbyshowingthecurrentNDT
procedures.CurrentNDTproceduresdidnotcomplywith
APIQ1DOESapplyforAPI2Bmanufacturedproductsincethisdocument
requirementsforvalidatingtheNDTprocedures.Thecurrent
doesnotspecificallyidentifytheprocessesrequiringvalidation.Therefore,
NDTprocedurescomplywithAnnexureEandAnnexureKofAPI thelistofprocessesneedingvalidationidentifiedinAPIQ1doesapply,
5L45thedition.Butthereisnoevidencetodemonstratethese includingNDT.Therequirementsofonespecification(5L)cannotbe
currentprocedurescomplywith5.7.1.5requirementsfor
appliedtoanotherspecification(2B),unlessthelatterspecifiesthe
validatingthoseprocedures.
requirementsnormatively(2Bdoesnotreference5Lforperformanceof
Question:IsittheintentionofQ1satisfiedbydemonstratingthe NDT).
currentNDTproceduresasanevidencefor5.7.1.5?

Q1

9th

5.7.6

Question:Inclause5.7.6,doesthedefinitionofproductinclude
finishedproductonly(whichisinourcaseispipe);orinclude
equipmentusedtoproducefinishedproduct(pipe),suchas
sparepartstobeusedformaintenanceofequipment?

Yes(onlytothefirstpartofthequestion).Inthiscase,product
preservation(perAPIQ1,5.7.6)wouldimpactonlytheitembeingmade
andapplicableconstituentpartsunderthespecification.Itdoesnot
includetheequipmentusedinmakingtheequipment.Suchequipment
wouldbecoveredunderAPIQ1,5.7.8and5.8,asapplicable.

Q1

9th

5.7.7.3

Background:WhileperforminganAuditonafacilitythatis
transitioningtothe9thedition,theyuseamachinisttodoin
processinspectionoftheirownworkwhichisacceptableunder
Clause5.7.7.2(InprocessInspectionandTesting ).These
finishedcomponentscanbesoldtoacustomeronaPOand
therewasnodefinitionoffinishedproductinAPIQ19th
edition.
Queston:Iffinishedproductiswhateverislistedonthe
Purchaseorder,canacompanymeetClause5.7.7.3Final
InspectionandTestingrequirementPersonnelotherthanthose
whoperformedordirectlysupervisedtheproductionofthe
productshallperformfinalacceptanceinspectionatplanned
stagesoftheproductrealizationprocesssimplybyjusthaving
anInspectorreviewthedimensionalinspectionreportofthe
Machinist(whoinspectedhisownwork)andthensignoffthe
productasclearedtostock?

No.Finalacceptanceinspection(SpecQ1,Section3.1.2,Demonstration
throughmonitoringormeasurementthattheproductconformsto
specifiedrequirements)mustbeperformedbysomeoneotherthanthe
personwhoperformedagivenactivity.Areviewofinprocessinspection
reportsmayprovideverificationoftheworkthatwasperformed.
However,itdoesnotmeettheintentofperformingtheactualfinal
acceptanceinspectionbysomeonenotdirectlyinvolvedinthe
manufactureoftheproduct.

Q1

9th

5.7.7.3

Background:Inmostofourfacilities,theTesting&Assembly
No.
departmentsarecombinedandtheassemblerperformsthe
actualtestingoftheproduct.Testresultsaredocumentedby
thetestertodemonstratecompliancewiththequalityplan
and/ordocumentedprocedures.Aqualifiedindividualother
thantheonewhoassembledandtestedtheproductordirectly
supervisedtheassemblyandtestingoftheproductperformsthe
finalacceptanceinspectionbasedonmonitoringandreviewof
thetestingdocumentation.
Question:ThesecondparagraphofAPISpecificationQ1,9th
Editionclause5.7.7.3establishesrequirementsforpersonnel
whoperformfinalacceptanceinspection.Isittheintentofthis
paragraphtoalsoestablishrequirementsforpersonnelwho
performtestingofproduct?

Q1

9th

5.7.7.3

Question:Oneofourfacilitiesisconsideringdeployingatruecell No.APIQ1onlyrequiresthatthefinalinspectionbeperformedby
manufacturingconceptwheretherewillbeacellleader
someoneindependentofthemanufacturingoftheproductthatistobe
responsibleforallproductrealizationprocessesforthe
inspectedbutdoesnotaddresshowthatpersonfitsintothe
manufacturingcell.Inthisconcept,theinspectorswhoperform organizationsreportingstructureororganizationalhierarchy.
finalacceptanceinspectionofthepartsmanufacturedinthecell
reporttothecellleaderbutareindependentofthemachinists
manufacturingtheparts.Thecellleaderisclearlyheld
accountableforallproductrealizationprocessesforthecellasif
itwasaseparatemanufacturingentity.Isitarequirementof
Clause5.7.7.3forpersonnelperformingfinalacceptance
inspectiontoreportindependentlyfromproductionsupervision?

Q1

9th

5.11.2d

Question:DoIneedanMOC,ifIamrewritingpartsofa
Yes.PertheorganizationsprocedureforcontroloftheMOCprocess,
procedure,introducingnewverbage,inhouse?Nocustomer
whentheproposedchangemayproduceanegativeimpactontheproduct
involvement.BasicallyforinstanceifIwanttochangefrom
(APIQ1,5.11.2).
cleaningaunitwithhosesintheyardtoremovethehosesbefore and
cleaning,thisrequiresanMOC?
No.Whentheproposedchangehaslittlenegativeimpactontheproduct.

Q1

9th

6.2.2

InternalAuditsWehavebeenaskedinrecentauditsfor
No.Aseparateinternalauditspecificallyagainsttheproductspecification
evidencethatourinternalauditshavecoveredtheAPIProduct isnotrequiredbyanyclausein6.2.2.However,theorganizationis
expectedtoprovideobjectiveevidencethattheproductrequirements
Specsforwhichwehavealicense.Section6.2.2detailsthe
requirementsfortheinternalauditsoftheQualityManagement havebeenauditedinternally.Thismayincludeevidenceofproduct
System,butdoesnotdiscusstheauditingoftheAPIProduct
requirementsbeingincludedandmaintainedinapplicableinternal
Specificationrequirementsasarequirement.Section6.2.3does proceduresthatwereapartoftheinternalaudit(seeNOTEin6.2.2.2).
addressprocessevaluationsandproductcompliance,buthasa
notethatindicatestheperformanceofaninternalauditand
managementreviewsatisfiestherequirement.WhenQMS
auditsareconductedfortheProductRealizationProcesses,the
productsrequirementsarereviewedandthedegreeof
complianceisusedasthebasisfordeterminingcompliancelevel
duringtheaudits.
Question:Basedonthelanguageof6.2.2,isitarequirementof
APISpecificationQ1,9thEditionfortheuserorganizationto
conductdocumentedauditsagainsttheproductspecification
requirements?

Q1

9th

6.2.2

Q1

9th

6.2.2.1/
6.5.1

Q1

9th

6.2.2.2

Question:Isitrequiredtouseadocumentedchecklistinthe
No.
performanceoftheInternalAudit?
Background:Clause6.2.2.1Theorganizationshallidentifythe Yes.
auditcriteria,scope,frequency,andmethodstoensurethatall
processesofthequalitymanagementsystemclaiming
conformitytotherequirementsofthisspecificationareaudited
atleastevery12months.Clause6.5.1Theorganizationsquality
managementsystemshallbereviewedatleastevery12months
bytheorganizationsmanagementTomeetrequirementsof
Clause6.2.2.1and6.5.1theorganizationconducts1internal
auditateachfacilityinaparticularmonthand1Management
ReviewinMarcheveryyear,respectively.Forexample,a
companyconductsManagementReviewonMarch11in2015,
andin2016planstoconducttheManagementReviewonMarch
18.
Question:Doesanauditormanagementreviewconductedthe
samemontheachyearmeettherequirementsofclause6.2.2.1
andclause6.5.1ofAPISpecificationQ1NinthEdition?

Background:APIQ1inSection6.2.2.2requiresAuditsshallbe No.Thespecificrequirementsforcompetencyareestablishedbytheuser
performedbycompetentpersonnel(see4.3.2.2)independentof ofthedocument.
thosewhoperformedordirectlysupervisedtheactivitybeing
auditedtoensureobjectivityandimpartialityoftheaudit
processandSection4.3.2.2requiresPersonnelshallbe
competentbasedontheappropriateeducation,training,skills,
andexperienceneededtomeetproductandcustomer
requirements.
Question:DoesthismeanthatInternalAuditorsrecordsneedto
stateAuditorAPIQ1competency?

You might also like