Patient Management
Systems
Terrence Adam, BS Pharm, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor, PCHS
University of Minnesota College of
Pharmacy
Background Interests
Interest in clinical informatics with training in pharmacy,
medicine and medical informatics and currently a practicing
physician in the Veterans Administration system (17 year
training program)
Inspired to do medical informatics after a summer pharmacy
internship in the pharmaceutical industry
Interest in use of information technology to improve
medication safety
Prior work in IT consultingdata reporting for a managed
care organization
Involved in implementation of computerized provider order
entry in a major integrated hospital/clinic (Mayo Arizona)
Interest in patient management systems with prior experience
as a clinical user in pharmacy and medicine, development
and evaluation of a patient monitoring system (lung
transplant), use of secondary data for surveillance
applications and evaluation of HIT for its effect on quality
Patient Management Systems
Definition: Any tool used to assist in the delivery of
clinical care from the point of care initiation to completion
Tools include paper-based systems, telecommunications
capabilities, health care organizations and information
technology systems
Will focus primarily on the use of health information
technology (HIT) systems and their potential to improve
care delivery and their historical evolution in the US
Identify potential impacts of major recent legislation to
effect implementation and use of health information
technology
Patient Management Systems
Revolve around clinical encounters and
charts
Historically limited role for documentation
Limited Treatments and Diagnostics
With growing medical complexity came the
need for effective documentation
Billing
Professional Communications
Medical Legal document
Development of Documentation
Part of slow evolutionary process
Plummer Chart at Mayoone of early efforts to
create and maintain a clinical database
Designed a dossier archive
First Exam
Provider Notes
Admission and discharge information
Laboratory and Radiology report information
Summary of problems and visit on cover (index)
Clinical Charts (paper)
Problems with paper chart
Only one copyemergent consult problem
If not immediately availableas if it never
existed (even if cost $20k)
Lost components
Privacy-no tracking
No decision support
Legibility
Getting the chart (timing)->
Paper Chart Advantages
One stop source of information
Quicker to document information
(sometimes)
Ability to integrated shortcuts and
abbreviations (fishtails and Xs)(Neuro
exam)
Ease of useWYSIWYGlimited training
requirements except the black arts of chart
and data hoarding (Informatics solutions?)
Information Technology Revolution
Historical trend of new technical capabilities and
rapid advancement in computing power
paralleling advancing medical technology
Enticing enough for many industries to buy
mainframes and then later minicomputers and
microcomputers
Increasing computing power and lower costs led
to increasing use of the microcomputer (PC) and
decentralization
Many industries adopting IT and making
changes in workflow and enhancing efficiency
Information Technology in Health
Care
Health care slower to adapt general IT
applications
Billing was on papercheck boxes and put a
number on the billeach specific to an
insurance company
Key IT solution was fast and detail oriented
clerks to avoid insurance rejections
Creation of Medicare created a large pool with a
single payor in common and corresponding
billing system in common
Need for review of billing process
IT Application Development
Primarily focused on billing
Mix of home built versus vendor
purchased software
Early mainframes and minicomputers only
useful for hospital practices given the high
costs of purchase and significant need for
support
Once mainframes in hospitals people
began to get creative
First movers in HIT
Costar system in Boston at Harvard (1968)
HELPHealth Evaluation through Logical
Processing at Intermountain Health
Care/Latter Day Saints Hospital in Salt
Lake City
Regenstrief Electronic Medical Record
CPRSComputerized Patient Record
Systemin Department of Veterans
Affairs
Changing Focus of HIT
Started in 1970s on large mainframe systems
primarily as tools for billing
Later development of minicomputer based
systems in departments tied to mainframe
Radiology
Pharmacy
Laboratory
HIT historically started with information systems
of a hospital but later also includes health
systems and clinics
What is HIT?
HIT Components
Patient Identification Component
Scheduling
Admission Discharge and Transfer
Electronic Medical Record (EMR)
Medical Records administration
Intensive Care and Operating Room systems
Pharmacy
Radiology and Picture Archiving and
Communication Systems (PACS)
Pathology and Lab Systems
Billing and Financial
Practice Management, messaging, security, etc
HIT Record Keeping
Data collected in hospital stay can be
voluminous and multifaceted
Use HIT to provide repositories of information
Mechanism to do reportingfor current and
future needs
Tracking of tests and ordersradiology,
pathology and laboratoryBar code ex.
First major application was storing data for
patient billing
Communication and Integration
Information systems provides common link for divergent
medical specialists, nurses, technicians, etc
Goal is to have all relevant information availablekey
advantage to electronic system is ability to have
immediate access to more than one copy **key
productivity gain**
Potential for geographically disparate data sharing
potential for cost savings to system (and patient)
Common interface allows for enterprise messaging and
alerts for clinical and logistical needs (Ex. Critical data,
Appointment availability, traffic alerts, down time, bed
needs)
Surveillance
Many patterns in medicine are predictable and need
action plan
Blood cultures turning positive
Critical laboratory values
Concerning radiological findings
Use of artificial intelligence systems for decision support
and also for data surveillance
Sweep system for relevant data
Report data out for needed action and decision
support
Order entry and clinical result alerts
Preventive medicine needs (Cancer screening)
HIT Implementation Trend
Certain components very high market
penetrationradiology, pharmacy, lab
Otherslimitedcomputerized provider
order entry, decision support
Historicallyoff the shelf product
purchased as best of breed
Several problems ensuedmainly
workflow and compatibility
HIT Implementation Trend
Change to integrated purchasing
Goal to have best suite of products
Tradeoffs
Not have the best individual components
Need to change from prior systems
Reimplementation
Loss of backward compatibility
Advantages
Less need for local customization and implementation
Simplified support infrastructure and maintenance
Potential to drive industry consolidation
Adoption is slow but steady
Keys to implementation success:
A thorough analysis of clinical workflow
Define the key problems to address
Get early and active involvement of providers
Anticipate how HIT affects workflow
Identify how care delivery is enhanced
Define a long-term budgetary plan for
deployment
Get administrative commitment for deployment
Understand the limitations of current technology
Ubiquitous HIT/EMR will be
adopted (someday)
Institute of MedicineFirst published in
1991 with update in 1997
Predicted in 1991we will have widespread
use of electronic HIS/EMR by 2001
Reiterated in 1997 but identified need for
greater national effort with goal in 5 years
Now in 2009 the Obama Administration has
a target of 2014Good luck...
http://www.nap.edu/books/0309055326/html/index.html
What is the current HIT
landscape?
Does it work?
Does HIT Effect Care Quality?
Evaluation of the effect of health information
technology on clinical quality measures
Expectation that health information technology
implementation improves clinical care
Use of Health Quality Alliance measures to
assess for care quality (national data set)
Assess the types of information system in place
around the country (HIMSS Analytics survey
data)
Preliminary results
US System and HIT
Great deal of overall fragmentation of types of systems
used.
Growing trend of consolidation to single provider
solutions vs (inpt and outpt)
Limited use the higher order function that are most likely
to have an impact: decision support, alert system,
surveillance systems, order entry
Growing data on quality improvement associated with
HIT
Specific measure improvements
Aggregate positive effect
New national policy initiatives may help
2009 Stimulus Bill
How to spend 800 billion dollars
Federal Stimulus Package
Significant potential impact on patient
management systems with goal of
universal EMR by 2014.
58/407 pages in stimulus bill
Significant authority to National
Coordinator
1 year to review and provide substantial
new recommendations if needed
Federal Stimulus Package
19.2 billion in spending
17.2 billion for implementation of certified
electronic health record (EHR)
Question of definition of certified EHR
Tiered paymentfirst movers get more $
Need to provide interconnectivity
Provide quality measures
Federal Stimulus Package
$2 Billion for Office of National Coordinator
Money for development of regional health
information organizations
Establish best practices on adoption,
deployment and use of HIT
State grants to facilitate HIT
Integrate EHR into clinical education
Restrictions on data disclosures and sale
of health information to minimal data sets
Federal Stimulus Package
Other goals of implementation
Reduce health care costs
Improve clinical decision making
Improve clinical care coordination
Facilitate research
Reduce health disparities
Improve identification and response to public health
threats
Promote competition and choice
Establish chief privacy officer
Major goals to achieve
Questions?
