100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 276 views 286 pages Courant, R. Calculus of Variations
Calculus of Variation for an outstanding mathematician
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Carousel Previous Carousel Next
Save Courant, R. Calculus of Variations For Later CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS
y icles and exercises)
A. Mouvani
TNR TOE
and amended oy Moser, 1962
Supplementary noes iv Meetie feeste ang Ianan Robin
Courant Institute of Mathematiles? Gelerrce:
New York UniverstiyTae Courant Institute publishes a number o
sets of lecture notes, & list of title:
currently availoble will be sent uoon reques
t.
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sclences
251 Mercer Street, New York, New York 10012
adContents
Page
Tatroduction 2
I. Formalism of Calculus of Variations
1. The Euler Equation 10
2, Generalizations of the Zuler Equation 18
3. Natural Boundary Conditions 25
4. Degenerate Euler Equation 30
5. Isoperimetric Problems 33
6. Parametric Form of the Theory 42
7. Invariance of the Euler Equation 48
8, The Legondro Condition 52
TI. Hamilton Jacobi Theory ~ Sufficient Conditions
1. The Legendre Transformation Su
2. The Distance Function - Reduction to Canonical
Form 56
3+ The Hamilton-Jacobi Partial Differential Equation 60
4. The Two Body Problem 7
5. The Homogensous Case - Geodesics 76
6, Sufficient Conditions 62
7. Construction of a Field ~ The Conjugate Point 87
Supplomentary Notes to Chapter II
1. Tne Hamilton-Jacobi Equation 90
2. Correspondence between Solutions of the Hamilton-
Jacobi Equation and Fielas oh
3. Application to Differential Geometry 96
4. Analytical Representation of a Field 97
5. Conjugate Points 100
6. Application to Sturm's Theory 105
III. Direct Methods tn the Calculus of Variations
Introduction 109
Compactness in Function Space, Arzelats Theorem
and Applications 14
Application to Geodesios: Lipschitz's
Condition 18
fiiupplementary Notes aad Exercises
Direct Variational Methods in the Theory of
Integral Equations 12.
Dirichlet's Principle 12k,
Dirichlet's Integral 12h
Minimizing Sequences 124
Explicit Expression of Dirichlet's Integral for a
Cirele. Hadamard's Objection 124
The Gorrect Formulation of Dirichlet's Principle 126
Dirichlet's Principle 126
Lower Semi-Continulty of Dirichlet's Integral for
Harmonic Puncttons 126
Proof of Dirichlet's Principle for the Circle 127
"Distance" in Function Space. Triangle Inequalities 129
Construction of a Harmonie Function u by a
"Smoothing Process" 132
Convergence of w, 137
Proof that D(u) = a 139
Proof that the Function u Attains the Prescribed
Bowndary Values 140
Alternativo Proof of Dirichlet's Principle 143
Numerical Procedures 150
The Ritz Method 150
Method of Finite Differences 153
Boundary Valuo Problem in a Net 156
Existence and Uniqueness of the Solution 156
Practica] Methods 157
Convergence of the Difference Equation to a
Differential Equation 158
Method of Gradients 159
Application of the Calculus of Variations to the
Eigenvalue Problems 162
Extremun Properties of Zigenvalues 162
The Maximum-Minimum Property of the Eigenvalues 166
1. References 169
2. Notes on the Brachistochrone problem 179
3. The road of quickest ascent to the top of a mountain 171
ivPare
4. The shortest connection between two points in a
closed simply-connected region 17h
5. The shortest connection in a plane between two points 178
6. Problems for which no solutions exist 180
7+ Semi-continuity 188
8. Genoralization of the Fundamental Lemma 189
9. Derivation of Euler's equation by special variations 191
10. Characterization of the longer great circle arc 192
11. Integration of Euler's equation in special cases 192
12. The shortest connection between two points on a
sphere 196
13. Application of Euler's equation to classical problems 203
ly. Invariance and the Euler expression 213
15. Transformation theory 24?
16. An approximation theorem for minimum problems with
aide conditions 270INTRODUCTION
The Calculus of Variations has assumed an increasingly
important role in modern developments in analysis, geometry,
and physics. Originating as a study of certain maximum and
mininsn problems not treatable by the methods of elementary
calculus, variational calculus in its present form provides
powerful methods for the treatment of differential equations,
the theory of invariants, existence theorems in geometric
function theory, variational principles in mechanics. Also
important are the applications to boundary value problems in
partial differential equations and in the numerical calcu-
lation of many types of problems which can be stated in vari-
ational form, No literature representing those diverging view-
points is to be found among standard texts on calculus of vari-
ations, and in this course an attempt will be made to do
justice to this variety of problems.
The subject matter with which calculus of variations is
concerned is a class of extremum (i.e. maximum or minimum)
problems which can be considered an extension of the familiar
class of extremum problems dealt with by elementary differen-
tial calculus, In the elementary problems one seeks extremal
values of a function of one or more (but in any case a finite
number) real variables. In the more general problems consi-
dered by calculus of variations, the functions to be extremized,
sometimes called functionals, have functions as independent
variablos. The area A(f) below a curve y = f (x), for oxample,
is a functional since its value depends upon a whole function
f. (It is possible to treat a functional as a function of
an enumerable set of Fourier coefficients, but this attack
usually leads to almost insuperable difficulties.)
One of the earliest problems of this type was the iso-
perimetric problem considered by the ancient Greeks, This
is to find, among all closed curves of a given length, the
one which encloses the maximum area, It is intuitively
evident that the solution is a circle, but this fact has beensatisfactorily proved only in recent times, and the corres-
ponding theorem concerning the sphere is even mare difficult.
The modern development of calculus of variations,
however, began in 1696 with the formulation of the brachis-
tochrone problem by John Bernoulli. This problem is to find,
among all curves connecting two given points, that one which
has the property that a particle sliding along it under the
action of gravity alone falls from one point to the other in
the least tine. This problem excited great interest among
the mathematioians of that day, and gave rise to a train of
research which is still continuing.
Subsequent developments in classioal calculus of vari-
ations were the derivation of necessary conditions for an
extremum {corresponding to the conditions grad f(x.
yoXoe 09%, 50
for a function f of n variables ) by Euler and more rigorous-
ly by Lagrange; and the development of sufficient conditions
(corresponding to the consideration of the quadratic form in
seoond derivatives of £(x),%5,+++X,) at a stationary point)
vy Hamilton, Jacobi, and others; culpinating in the completion
of this theory by Weierstrass.
The broader aspects of physical variational principles
were first set forth by Maupertius, and were given a firmer
foundation by the work of Euler, Hamilton, Jacobi and Gauss.
We will now consider the mathematioal formulation of
several problems;
A —-¥ X
a) The Brachistochrone
A partiole P slides \
under the influence of gra- PL
vity along a curve connecting 1 “~B( a)
\ tae
A and B. The velocity v at ut
any point is given by
vee ym,
so that the time of fall T is
(B) ate ®B) as
(a) (ay¥ 2guSuppose the curve is given by u = f(x), where £(0) = 0,
f(x) = uj, and f\x) is assumed to be piecewise difforontiebie.
Then co = /1 + ul"dx. Hence the solution of the peoblem cen
oe obtained sy finding the function u = f(x) which minimizes
the integral T (e functional)
x
vi 2
pede Y/R ik.
VE %
sernoulli obtained the solution to this provlem using en en-
tively different line of reesoning. He approximated the path
uu? f\x) by a series of line segments dividing the distance
frllon into equel parts, t!.e particle velocity bei sued
constant through- A
out each segment.
It 18 an elementary
exercise in caloeulus
to devive Snell's
law of refraction
u B
= constant
ain i . gins
M4 Yy
ag the condition for the path of rinimm time across a cis-
continuity. Taking; the livit os tie segments are made smeller,
Bernoulli argued thet the curve would’ be given by
sin @
eee
which is indeed the correct answer, charecteriaing tie cyelord.
Gf course, Bernoulli's solution is only an indication rather
than a vroof, since A x
he neither justified 8
the limating process,
nor stowed that his
solution was unique.
= constant%) biniwun Area of a Surface of Revolution
Consider the
surface generated by
revolving tie curve AB
svout the x-axis. If
the equataon of this
curve is y = f(x),
where fx) = Yor
and f is piecewise differentiable, then the area of the
surface is given by the functional
x
2
x(t) = an § cAvite® ax.
‘1
The problem, then, is co determine f so that I(f) is a
minimum. ‘he prooler. can be "solved" physicolly by stretching
a soap film between the two circles (made of wire) st A and
Be Surface tension in the film will minimize the erce.
ce) Geodesics
The curve of shortest length connecting two voints in
@ plane is a straight line. This need not be taken as an
axiom, but can be proved. Similarly, on the sucfece of a
sphere, the curve of least length is the arc of a great circle.
In general, on any surface, the curves of least length conxec-
ting vairs of points are celled geodesics and their determi-
nation leads to problems in calculus of variations. In case
the surfoce is developable (i.e. one which can be deformed
into a plens without eltering length -- e.g. a cone) the
geodesics are given by the corresponding atraight lines
in the plane.
a) The isoperimetric Provliem
Consider a plane
closed curve given in pera-
weteie form by x = ft},
g(t) where f and g have
piecewise continuous deri-
vatives, are of period an in t,
4and the curve has a given length L,
en
l= f [PTF at
0
The problem 1s to find, among all f and g satisfying these condi-
tions, the pair that maximizes the area A
2
a-h (xy - yx) at
= 3
0
This problem is different from the foregoing three problems in
that we seek to extremize a functional A of two variables (the
functions f and g) subject to a prescribed condition, L= constant.
All such problems in caleulus of variations are called tso-
perimetric problems; the analogy with the carresponding elementary
problem of extremizing a funetion F(x.y) of two real variables
subject to an auxiliary condition, say G(x.y) = 0, is evident.
We will now prove that the circle, i.e.
c(t)
asin t + aycos t
alt) = a,sin t - aycos t
maximizes A, subject to L = constant. Consider the expression
2
L
beqe-a
For the cirele, I = 0. We then w:
h to
other curves. Let t = aut, where s ls ar
wo that T > 0 for ell
henjgth. Then
and
HenceSince (x + y)? # (7 - x)? 2 0, we will consider
aa fw + x? )at + fw = y®) at.
Under the conditions imposed, we may expand x and y
in Fourier series
2
x~B (a,cos nt + bein nt}
oO
~Z_ (aicoa nt + bt ain nt) ,
y a (ax )
By taking the center of gravity of the curve as the orivin
(i.e. translating the axes x! = x + Xe yosye Yq) so thet
2n
xi dts jr are
=e! 20,
ay tay 20
Then, droppin; the primes,
we have
‘aor x
f (8? » yet = Le (n®(a2 + v2) ~ (a2 + v2))
0
waich 4s positive unless a, = b, = 0 for n> 1, i.e. unless
x = a)008 t+ byein te
J - 37) ato
0
unless y = aj con t + bisin t.
Similarly
But in the case that x end y are both of thie foxm, we have
req (rary = x)?) at
=E (ia, + apedy - by)? + (a, = af + dy + OY)7)
6whieh ta zero only if a, = bj, af =v.
{ je Hence I > 0 unless
X= a,008 t + by sin t
y= bycos t - a) sin t
which are the parametric equations of a circle.
In all the problems that we have considered so far we
have tacitly assumed that they make sense, i.e, that a solution
exists. Howaver, this is by no means always the case. For
example, consider the D
integral q
i
1b) = ( —*
1 2
o 1+ [Or (xh 3
$(0) = 0, 602) #2
A c x
where $ is subject to the condition that it pass through the
two points A and B, and let us try to find a continuous and
piecewise differentiable function > which wither maximizes
or minimizes I($). By inspection we see that
o< (bp <2
since the integrand is positive and always less than one.
However from the figure it is easily seen that by picking
point © very close to x = 1 we can make I take values as close
to unity as we please for the curve AC B, and by taking the
ordinate of D large enough we can make I as small as we please
for the curve ADB, Since there is no admissible curve }
which will make I() take on the values 0 or 1, there is no
solution to either the minimum or maximum problem,
Let us now consider a problem in which the existence
of a solution depends on the class of admissible curves,
We look for a closed curve of minimum erea, within which a
line of given lengthcan turn through a complete revolution.
If we limit ourselves to convex curves, the solution is
given by the equilateral triangle having the given line as
7altitude. However, if we
remove the restriction of
convexity, it can be shown
that the area can be made
as small as we please, and
since no solution exists
having zero area, there is
no solution to the problem.
We therefore see that in order for a variational ->ro-
blem to be solvable, some care :.ust be teken in the choice
of admissible functions.
Problema
1) Verify that the property
S108 = constant
rz
characterizes the cycloid.
2) Characterize the larger great circle ore between two
points on a sphere as the solution of ¢ riinimex problem.
Generalize to a great ciroie aro which winds around n times.
3) Find the shortest path
between two points A and B B
lying botween two convex
curves as boundaries. This
is an example of a general
type of problem in which
auxiliary conditions in the
form of anequalities are
imposed | in oontradistinction to isoperimetric problems
where auxiliary equations must be satisfied).
4) Pind the path which requiroa the least time in ascending
a rotationally symuetric mountain using, a car with its velo-
oity a civen funotion f of the angle of inclination a, such that
8M0) ey, £5) = 0,
f(a) and f(a) monotonic. £\
5) Show thet any admissible functicn $ \x) cen be approxi-
mated by admissible functions $,(x) and $5.) such that
16) oan be made as amall as we ploase and 1(6)5) as close
to unity as we please, where
1d) = , gx
} d+ (dixieI. FORMALISH OF CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS
1. The Yuler Equation. ‘he simplest type of problem in the
calculus of variations is to extrenize a functional I(>) of
only one independent variable, the function (x). In
practice, the functional is usually an integral of a given
form, and we will henceforth restrict our discussion to
functionsls which are integrals, In Genersl terms, then,
the siinplest tyve of problem is to extrenize
p
fy 1p) = s PC, 1x) P(x) Jax
where F is a given function which we will assume }.aa conti-
nuous first partirl derivatives and piecewise continuous
second pastial derivatives, ‘tno function $\x) will be rea-
tricted to the class of admissible functions satisfying the
conditions
(2) O(a) = a, (db) = B
$(x) continuous
P'(x) piecewLse continuous
The brachistochrone is an example of this type of problem.
Assuming that an adnissible function u(x) exists for
whieh Iju) is an extremum, we first wish to find a necessary
condition wiich this function must satisfy.
Consider a function $(x,t) such that
43) O(x,t) 1s admissible for ell t
Q(x,t) end 9, .x,t) are continuous
9,4 (48) is plecewise continuous
o(x,0) = wx)
Por example, we may choose $(x,t) = u(x) + tZ(x);
however, any function satisfying (3) will suffice. If wo
define
(yd) Ot) = 109(x,t))
lothen G(t) has a stationary point at t = 0. Accordingly
(5) a -& t Fiapsbtdax | = 0
Differentiating under the integral sign, we have
b
16) i) (Pye + Py oax 20,
where+ .
(n) (x) = O40 4,0) «
According to (2), (3), and (7) we see that
(9) % Ls continuous
&' piecewise continuous
ta) =2(b) 20,
the last equation being true since ((a,t) 5 A and $(b,t) = B.
If we modify (6) by integrating by parts, the anelogy
with the corresvonding necessary condition for an extremum
of a function of n voriables is revealed.
9) 2
f (Pye +R Sax = Fe + (ik Fy eax
le a
b
diy
“f iP, - wy itax 0.
a
In the case of a function f(x,,--+,x,) of n variables,
we may derive the necessary conditions for an extremum by
considering g(t) > f(xy (t), Kyit), +0 ex, (t)) where the equations,
44" x(t) define a ourve in n-dimensional space. If
1%, (0), (0), 00x, (0) is to be am extremum, then
(io) q =O.
# |-o
In the literature & and are usually oalled the
Variation of u ond u! respectively, and written 6u, du! .
il
You might also like [Oxford Graduate Texts] Oliver Davis Johns - Analytical Mechanics for Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition [2nd Ed] (Instructor Solution Manual, Solutions) (2011, Oxford University Press, OUP, O.U.P) - Libgen. PDF
[Oxford Graduate Texts] Oliver Davis Johns - Analytical Mechanics for Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition [2nd Ed] (Instructor Solution Manual, Solutions) (2011, Oxford University Press, OUP, O.U.P) - Libgen.
438 pages