Feasibility Study Guide

SPORT AND RECREATION FACILITIES

JULY 2007

A guide for sport and recreation facilities owners and managers

Feasibility Study Guide

SPORT AND RECREATION FACILITIES
JULY 2007
2nd EDITION

Enquiries or comments may be directed to:

Disclaimer

Manager, Facilities Development

Department of Sport and Recreation
PO Box 329 LEEDERVILLE WA 6903
or
[email protected]
www.dsr.wa.gov.au

This recourse contains comments of a general nature only

and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for
professional advice. No responsibility will be accepted by the
Department of Sport and Recreation for loss occasioned to
any person doing anything as a result of any material in this
resource.

July 2007

This guide was prepared with a view to outlining the

Department of Sport and Recreations requirements for a
feasibility study. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions,
or recommendations expressed herein are guidelines only
and should not be expressly relied on by project proponents.

ISBN: 0-9752115-3-6
This guide is produced by:
Department of Sport and Recreation
246 Vincent Street, Leederville, Western Australia 6007
PO Box 329, LEEDERVILLE WA 6903
Telephone 9492 9700
Facsimile 9492 9711
www.dsr.wa.gov.au

Copyright 2007 Department of Sport and Recreation

Government of Western Australia
Contributors to this edition:
R. Didcoe and B. Saxby, Department of Sport and Recreation.

Contents
1.0 Introduction

2.0 Facility Planning Process

3.0 Preliminar y Planning

Corporate Policies and Plans

Assessment of Need

4.0 Preparation

Establishing a Co-ordinating Committee

Terms of Reference (TOR)

Methodology

Community Involvement

5.0 Feasibility Study Process

The Process in Brief

Review Background Information

Organisational Philosophy

Market Analysis

Justification of the Proposed Facility

Draft Management Plan

10

Concept Design

12

Location Rationale

12

Design/Technical Evaluation

13

Capital Costs

13

Financials

14

Staging Alternatives

15

Sustainability

15

Revisit the Needs Assessment

16

Recommendation

16

6.0 Writing the Feasibility Report

17

7.0 Conclusion

19

8.0 Further Reading

20

9.0 References

21

1.0 Introduction
The second phase in the facility planning process
is the Feasibility Study. The purpose of a feasibility
study is to examine the viability of a proposal so that
any decision can be informed by objective analysis.
Your decision may be to implement, amend, refine or
abandon the proposal. It should thoroughly test the
practicability of:

Management options

Facility components

Location options

Technical design options

Social, economic and environmental sustainability

Cost

This guide provides practical assistance in undertaking

a feasibility study for a proposed sport or recreation
facility. It highlights the planning issues that need to be
considered, the various ways of gathering information
and the outcomes that should be achieved.
The information provided is not definitive. It does not,
and cannot, outline the correct process of undertaking
a feasibility study for all proposed sport or recreation
facilities. The nature of the proposal, together with
local circumstances, will determine the content and
process of the feasibility study. This is intended to be
a guide and should be used as such. Contact your
nearest Department of Sport and Recreation office if
you require assistance with using the guide.
Remember, a sport or recreation facility should
be about meeting community needs. It should be
designed for and with people, facilitate community
interaction, be a community hub and be affordable
to the community. The outcome of any feasibility study
should be tested against this.
This guide is part of a suite of documents that can
assist you with planning, testing and managing
facilities.

Feasibility Study Guide

2.0 Facility Planning Process

The five key phases in the Facility Planning Process for a sport and recreation facility are illustrated in the following
diagram:

Figure 1

Identify Key Community Values and

Organisational Philosophies
NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Review of Existing Provision

Information Sources
Determine Needs

Phase
One

Development Proposal

Abandon Proposal
DECISION

Upgrade Existing Facility

PROPOSAL

or Develop New Facility

Market Analysis

Phase
Two

Draft Management Plan

FEASIBILITY STUDY

Concept Plan
Financial Viability
Risk Assessment

DECISION

Implement, Amend, Postpone,

Stage Development or
Abandon Proposal

Management Plan
Design Brief

Phase
Three

DESIGN

Design Team
Schematic Design
Design Development
Contract Documentation
PROJECT

Phase
Four

CONSTRUCTION

Phase
Five

EVALUATION

Construction and Handover

Facility Operational
Project Evaluation

Feasibility Study Guide

Although this planning process may seem lengthy, it is

cost-efficient. It is generally accepted that the feasibility
phase of the planning process may cost up to 10% of
the total cost of the development, but can determine up
to 65% of the final cost of building the project.

In planning a sport or recreation facility, the first step

is to undertake a needs assessment to justify its
provision. The Departments Needs Assessment and
Decision Making Guides can assist.
The second step is to undertake a feasibility study
to assess the viability of the proposal. The feasibility
study should determine:

As planning advances into the design and construction

phases, it becomes increasingly more difficult to
influence the final cost of the project. Figure 2
demonstrates that the optimum time to reduce life
and project costs associated with any project is at a
feasibility study stage. The cost and time impact is
greatly reduced as the process continues along its life
cycle. An increased emphasis on the feasibility and
planning stages of a project can greatly improve the
life performance of an asset.

The range of opportunities and services to be

offered at the facility

How the facility should be managed

The best location for the facility

What areas and features the facility should

comprise of

The practicality of the design and technical aspects

Whether the community can afford the cost of its

construction, operation and disposal

The economic, environmental and social impact

that the proposed facility is likely to have on the
community
Figure 21

FEASIBILITY STUDY

FACILITY PLANNERS
IMPACT
ON
COSTS

DESIGN CONSULTANTS
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTORS
OPERATIONAL FACILITY PERSONNEL

TIME

Feasibility Study Guide

LIFE CYCLE

3.0 Preliminary Plan

CORPORATE POLICIES
AND PLANS
Before embarking on a feasibility study, the client
should discern the appropriateness of the proposal to
build a facility. Is it the clients core business to provide
this facility or would it be more appropriate for another
agency to provide it? Is there scope to partner the
proposal?
The client should have a recreation and/or sport policy,
stating its vision, mission and aims for the provision of
facilities and services. This policy may also form part of
a broader corporate plan.
Ideally, the provision of sport and recreation facilities
should be guided by a Strategic Recreation Plan which
establishes a future direction and vision and strategies
for achievement, guiding service and facility provision.
The Local Government [Amendment] Act2 introduced
in 1995, requires local authorities in Western Australia
to develop an overview of the plan for the future for all
major sport and recreation facility or service provision
investments. This plan normally takes the form of a
strategic plan that outlines the aims and objectives
of each project, estimated capital and operating
costs, funding sources, proposed timeframes and
performance indicators . Business plans provide the
specific operational details on how a particular service
will be delivered.
For further information on facility planning please
consult the resource Decision Making Guide.3.

ASSESSMENT OF NEED
It is essential that a needs assessment be undertaken
before embarking on a feasibility study. In short,
this involves identifying any lack or over supply of
existing facilities and services. The aim of a needs
assessment is to justify provision. It is only when the
needs assessment is completed that a feasibility study
is undertaken to assess the viability of any proposed
facility development.
For information on undertaking a needs assessment
please consult the resource Needs Assessment Guide
and Decision Making Guide: Sport and recreation
facilities4.

Feasibility Study Guide

4.0 Preparation
ESTABLISHING A
COORDINATING COMMITTEE

business/financial management

facility management

A number of different approaches can be used to

undertake a feasibility study:

community development.

Internal approach - the study is undertaken by

members of the client organisation

External approach - the study is undertaken by a

private consultant giving independence

Combined approach - the study is undertaken by a

mix of internal and external personnel

It may not be necessary for the committee to have

knowledge in all of these areas the specific expertise
needed will be determined by the complexity of
the proposal. However, it would be beneficial if the
committee members had a basic understanding of the
various aspects of planning a facility.
The client should provide the committee with the
following:

For the purpose of this guide, the last option

(combined approach) is discussed below, as this will
achieve a greater commitment from stakeholders and
the community.
A combined approach requires the client to appoint
a coordinating committee to manage and control the
feasibility study process. This coordinating committee
should comprise of:

A project co-ordinator (the in-house officer

responsible for the study)

Other relevant members of the client agency

Community/business sector representatives

Representatives of proposed user groups/tenants

An experienced facility manager

Department of Sport and Recreation personnel

The make-up of the committee will depend upon the

type of facility being proposed. Key stakeholders
including Department of Sport and Recreation staff
should be involved from the start. The committee
should have the power to co-opt other professionals
and individuals if and when required.
Ideally the committee should have a diverse range of
expertise in:

project management

town planning

building design

recreation planning

Feasibility Study Guide

A philosophy/values statement of the organisation.

An outline of the purpose of the committee.

The reporting relationship between the client and

the committee.

Details of the study budget and other available

resources.

THE TERMS OF REFERENCE

(TOR)
The TOR should be developed by the coordinating
committee and should outline the parameters of
the study. The TOR is what must be investigated
and reported upon. Furthermore it should detail the
following:

The philosophical base of the client and how this

impacts practically on the proposal

The aims and objectives of the proposed facility

What issues need to be investigated and reported

upon

Expectations regarding community involvement/

community consultation

Expectations regarding the outcomes/outputs of the

feasibility study report

Once developed, the TOR should be approved by the

client before commencing the study. This process will
ensure the client retains control over the scope of the
study.

Department of Sport and Recreation staff should

be invited on the coordinating committee, attend
appropriate committee meetings and provide an
advisory or consultation role where DSR provides
funding assistance. The Department may submit
minority reports on the feasibility study if the
department does not agree with the findings of the
study.

TERMS OF REFERENCE
EXAMPLES
1. To investigate and report on the social and financial
viability of the proposed facility
2. To identify a site/s that will maximise access
to the facility
3. To investigate management options and
recommend an appropriate facility
management model
4. To investigate and report on any special facility
needs that should be incorporated into the design
(e.g. disabled access)
5. To analyse planning, construction and management
costs of alternative sites, designs and management
structures and recommend the best
long-term option

Liaision with neighbouring local governments

A spatial (GIS) mapping process

Be aware of all assumptions and limitations

surrounding the methodology you choose. All
assumptions should be clearly stated in the feasibility
study report. Misleading information can be generated
by using inappropriate methods or by asking the wrong
people.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
In undertaking a feasibility study, community
involvement will generally strengthen community
ownership and the validity of the findings.
Broad community consultation may identify
opportunities to share resources, extend an
existing service, enter into a partnership or colocate complementary services. Where appropriate,
a co-operative approach can achieve maximum
effectiveness and efficiency.
The coordinating committee should decide how much
input the community will have into the feasibility study.
They should also consider engaging a skilled facilitator
to assist with coordinating the consultation process.

METHODOLOGY
The coordinating committee should decide what
investigative methods will be used in undertaking
the feasibility study. There are a number of different
methods used to identify and gather relevant
information. Choose the most appropriate methods for
your proposal. Some commonly used methods are:

Literature search

Community surveys

Site visits to existing facilities in other localities

Discussions with experienced facility managers and

peak industry bodies

Researched information, e.g. technical data, usage

patterns

Public meetings and forums

Direct interviews with key groups and individuals

Community workshops with key groups and

individuals

Workshops with expert reference groups

Feasibility Study Guide

5.0 Feasibility Study Process

THE PROCESS IN BRIEF
It is important to acknowledge the two stages in the Feasibility Study Process. The first stage, Concept Planning,
develops the concept of the facility, while the second stage, Feasibility Study, tests the practicability of the concept.
Ideally, the two stages should be undertaken separately by independent parties to ensure impartial judgement and
transparent processes.
Each feasibility study will, and should, vary in process and content. The diagram below illustrates the core elements of
the feasibility study process in a sequential progression.

Concept Planning

Market
Analysis

Feasibility Analysis

Review
Background
Information

Organisational
Philosophy

Justification
of the
Proposed
Facility
(Needs
Assessment)

Concept
Plan

Location
Rationale

Design/Technical
Evaluation

Draft
Management
Plan

Capital CostsLife Cycle Basis

Recommendations

Feasibility Study Guide

Re-visit
Needs
Assessment

Sustainability

Staging
Alternatives

Financials

REVIEW BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
It is important that any relevant background information
such as existing reports, studies and plans be
identified and reviewed. This background information
may include:

Documentation detailing the history and

development of the proposal, including the
report that recommended the proposal to be
pursued
Previous research/planning exercises (i.e. strategic
plan, needs assessment, etc)
Any technical reports or plans relevant to the
proposal

You should also review studies and reports relevant to

other similar facilities or communities of a similar size
and ideally a similar demographic profile.

ORGANISATIONAL
PHILOSOPHY
It is crucial that the organisational philosophy and
values are determined at the outset of the study
process. Your organisational philosophy should define
the social, financial and environmental outcomes that
could be expected from the facility. It should clarify
your position regarding the following policy issues:

Financial costs user contributions to capital,

maintenance and operating.

Equity/access community access to the facility

Multi/single use usage and programming.

MARKET ANALYSIS
It is important to assess the socio-demographic
characteristics of your community, participation
trends, and the strengths and weaknesses of potential
competitors and partners. It is useful to develop a
spatial locality map to illustrate the results of your
market analysis.
Socio-demographic characteristics
Socio-demographic characteristics can be identified
through statistics obtainable from the Australian
Bureau of Statistics (www.abs.gov.au) and local
government authorities. Other useful sources can
be obtained from the Department of Education
and Training, Department of Social Security and

Department for Planning and Infrastructure.

Collect the following information to reflect the
uniqueness of the community:

population size

age distribution

gender distribution

place of residence

level of education

income distribution

employment statistics

mobility

cultural origins

socio-economic status.

Once this information has been gathered,

the next step is to:

Plot population distribution and projected

population growth/decline

Evaluate relevant socio-demographic data

to identify the important social and economic
characteristics of the catchment population.

Identify the existence of any special groups

When used in conjunction with information on

participation trends, socio-demographic characteristics
can highlight the number of potential users for the
proposed facility and identify various target market
groups. Information on participation trends is available
from the Department of Sport and Recreations
Information Centre.
Review information on participation in sport and
recreation to identify current participation trends. What
are the general characteristics of those people who are
likely to participate in the activities you intend to offer?
How does this relate to your community?
Review documentation on trends and issues likely
to impact on the future demand for the proposed
facility (i.e. growth sports, increased home-based
opportunities, ageing population). See Appendix A.
Examine whether existing services are declining,
rising, ageing or developing? Look for patterns/trends/
cycles/seasons in relation to current consumption
of sport and recreation services. Check statistical
information from different sports with information
provided by the Department of Sport and Recreation
Western Australia or state sporting associations.

Feasibility Study Guide

Identify the size of the catchment area for the

proposed facility. How far does this extend and can
it be increased? What is the competition within the
catchment?
Ensure regular reviews on government planning
policies are conducted. Changes to policies can
determine or shape the decisions taken within the
feasibility study.

Competition
It is important to analyse potential competitors and
their customers. Assess both direct and indirect/public
and private competitors. The analysis should answer
the following:

Who are they and what facilities and services dont

they offer?

Where are they located?

Who uses their facilities and services?

How many people use their facilities and services?

What are their strengths and weaknesses?

Are they well managed?

What rates do they charge?

Basic Sport and Recreation Requirements

The need for a facility is crucial to the strength of the
feasibility study. It is not enough to say We believe
we need this facility the need for the proposed
development must be investigated, measured,
documented and supported, so that the client can be
assured that the proposal is justified and sustainable.
Re-visit the basic sport and recreation requirements
of the community, as identified in the initial needs
assessment, and review the investigative methods and
assumptions used to determine those needs.

Examine Options
Examine the different ways of satisfying the basic
sport and recreation requirements of the community.
The provision of a new facility may be only one of a
number of possible solutions.
Consider the following options and select the most
reasonable one for further investigation:

Employ a co-ordinator to develop programs and

services at existing facilities

What is the size and potential of their market

share?

Provide transport to a nearby existing facility, even

if that is run by another LGA

How are they likely to respond/react to the proposed

facility?

Amalgamate groups/combine usage at an existing

facility

Rearrange programming patterns at existing

facilities

Renovate/convert/extend an existing facility

Develop a joint-use agreement with another

agency/local government

Lease an existing facility

Construct a new facility, either in stages or all at

once

Evaluate each competitor on these factors and look for

an unsatisfied demand which offers an opportunity.
Consider what factors will attract people to the
proposed facility? What will enable the proposed
facility to complement its competitors rather than
compete against them? i.e. price, convenience,
opportunity to mix with others, range of sport and
recreation opportunities, quality of service and
facilities, public access, degree of hospitality,
opportunity to join a club, public transport etc.
It is impossible to offer all services to all market
segments. Decisions need to be made on which
specific market segments will be serviced before the
facility is developed.

JUSTIFICATION OF THE
PROPOSED FACILITY

Feasibility Study Guide

Determine how effective each of these alternatives

will be in meeting the basic sport and recreation
requirements of the community. Decide on a preferred
option. It is possible that you will identify several
workable solutions.

The examination of alternative solutions may have

already been completed as part of either:

Contract Management - The owner contracts

the management of the facility to an individual
manager, a community-based organisation,
or a commercial group. The contract manager
negotiates capital and operating budgets and
is responsible for the financial performance of
the facility. The owner usually contributes to the
maintenance of the facility. The ability to transfer
maintenance responsibilities may be restricted by
legislation.

Lease Management: A formal lease details the

rights and responsibilities of the owner and the
manager. The manager has full responsibility for
all aspects of the facilitys operations including
financial performance, asset maintenance, and
operating policies. The owner usually receives a
rental income but has no direct control over day-today management.

Joint Management: Two or more parties agree

to share the capital cost, usage and maintenance
of a facility. The key elements of the management
agreement (ie cost-sharing, legal and usage
arrangements) are recorded in a legally binding
document.

A sport and recreation needs assessment

conducted as part of a strategic recreation plan
or

A facility specific needs assessment

or

Consideration of a Strategic Facility Plan of the

appropriate State Sporting Association

Where this is the case, it is important for the committee

to review the recommended/preferred option and be
assured that the development of the proposed facility
is the most appropriate response.
It is important to remember that the provision of a
sport or recreation facility is a long-term financial
commitment. Meeting the construction cost is
only the starting point of funding a facility. It is the
ongoing operating and maintenance costs over the
life span of a facility that needs to be considered in
greater detail.

DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Where the preferred option is to develop a facility,
the next step is to prepare a draft management
plan. This should be done utilising the expertise of
an experienced facility manager (use an in-house
professional or engage an external person/ group such
as the Facility Management Association of Australia).

Determine the most appropriate management

structure.
Usage Estimates
Estimate the amount of usage the proposed facility is
likely to attract using the following methods:

It is important that management issues are addressed

prior to considering the design of the proposed facility,
ensuring that the end result is a facility that is designed
for effective and cost efficient management.
Management Structure
Decide on the most appropriate management
structure for the proposed facility. Be guided by your
organisational philosophy. A description of alternative
management structures is provided below:

Direct Management - The owner of the facility

employs the manager in a normal employee
employer relationship. The owner has full
responsibility for all aspects of the facilitys
operations including operating policies, financial
performance and asset maintenance. A
management committee may be established to
advise and direct the facility manager.

Community Consultation: Seek information

directly from potential user groups and individuals
regarding:

What specific facilities, program and

services potential users need/want

How often they would use them

Exactly when they would prefer to use them

How much they are prepared to pay

How far will they travel to use them

This approach records preferences and expressed

desires as opposed to real needs.

Comparable Facility Method: Use an existing

facility in an area with similar demographic
characteristics, as a benchmark to estimate usage
for your proposed facility. Define participation rates
in terms of a percentage of the total population
within the catchment area.

Feasibility Study Guide

10

Participation Rate Projection. Obtain sport and

recreation participation rate studies which present
participation rates according to demographic
categories. This data can be used to project
participation rates in activities you intend to
offer at your proposed facility. Caution should
be exercised when applying this method
however, since local factors greatly influence
participation and national and state data may
not be applicable regionally or locally.
Trend Analysis (To be used when replacing an
existing facility). Where participation rates and
facility usage levels have been recorded over time,
anticipated demand can be projected.

Existing usage patterns really only reflect existing

consumption, not real need. Caution should be
exercised when using this method as it usually results
in more of the same programs and facilities.
Other factors to consider when you estimate usage
include:

Accessibility to the facility

The impact of the cost of usage fees and the ability

of potential users to pay

The presence of competitive and complementary

attractions

Vehicle flow patterns

Climatic conditions

The quality of the experience being offered

Describe:

The size of each group

The particular needs of each

Why they will purchase the proposed programs and

services

How much they are able, willing and expect to pay

The sport and recreational needs of the targeted

customer groups will form the basis of the programs
and services to be offered at the proposed facility.

Programs and Services

Describe the programs and services that will be offered
to each target group. A sample program should be
included for each season, along with details of any
permanent bookings which have to be honoured.
Determine the opening hours of the proposed facility.
Consider how future programs will be developed.
The sport and recreation industry is vulnerable to
trends. It is important to be flexible in your approach
to programming to accommodate changing needs and
new activities.

Staff requirements
Staffing costs comprise the largest operating expense
in many sport and recreation facilities. Excessive
staffing will significantly increase your operating costs
while inadequate staffing may result in loss of potential
business, under-utilised facilities, staff stress/ turnover
or non-compliance with legislation.

When estimating the usage of a proposed facility:

Determine the appropriate number and type of

staff required through assessing staff structures at
existing facilities

For each position, identify the appropriate

qualifications, the hours of work (full-time, part-time
or casual) and the general responsibilities

Consider relevant award conditions and the scope

for workplace agreements

Target group/s

Examine structures in other operators facilities as a

benchmark comparison

Identify what target groups will be serviced by the

proposed facility.

A flow chart of the organisational structure could be

included.

Use more than one method performance

projections should not be based primarily on the
Comparable Facility Method

Establish a potential range of demand

Use conservative estimates as there is a tendency

to over estimate

Identify the key target customers along with lower

priority customer groups of the proposed facility.

11

Feasibility Study Guide

Marketing Strategy

shop, kitchen, creche, equipment storerooms, etc

Develop a marketing strategy for the proposed facility:

Note: Some of these are ineligible for funding

under DSRs CSRFF program or are low priorities.

Programs and services: Consider how the

programs and services to be offered will meet the
sport and recreational needs of the target group(s).

Define the functional requirements of each area

ie rough dimensions and capacity requirements
[based on estimated usage], major items of
furniture and equipment to be accommodated,
type of floor surfaces, storage space requirements,
mechanical services, etc

Define the important inter-relationships between

activity areas. Indicate where activity areas need
to be adjacent (consider flow of internal traffic,
supervision requirements and potential for multiskilling of staff). Bubble diagrams may be used to
provide a graphic illustration

How do these programs and services take

advantage of an opportunity/gap in the
marketplace?

Price: Consider proposed user fees. Will the target

group(s) be willing and able to afford them? How
do they compare with fees levied by competitors?

Access: Consider when the programs and services

can be offered. Why are these times practical and
desirable for the target group(s)?

Promotion: Consider strategies to advertise

and promote the programs and services. Will
these methods be effective in attracting the target
group(s)?

Customer Service Standards: Consider the

service standards required to attract and retain
loyal customers.

CONCEPT PLAN
In order to develop a preliminary concept of the
proposed facility, first identify the various facility
components, i.e. the different spaces/functional areas
needed within the main structure.

The above information should provide sufficient details

to enable a cost planner/quantity surveyor to estimate
the capital cost of the proposal.
Remember, the concept design is flexible and will
probably change. Do not spend time and money
developing and discussing alternative layouts at this
stage. Once the proposal is deemed feasible, and has
been approved, it will enter the design phase. It is then
that the skills of a consultant design team are utilised
to develop a schematic design.
Note: If a design consultant is employed to draw
up footprint plans/ illustrations of your concept plan,
it is important to ensure their engagement will not
compromise your choice of consultants later in the
design phase, should this proposal proceed.

Information on what facility components will be the

most appropriate can be ascertained from:

Discussions with proposed users/tenants

Visits to similar facilities where the community is of

a similar size and demographic

Discussions with facility managers, design

consultants and sport or recreation planners,
industry peak bodies (i.e. LIWA)

Care should be taken to be guided by real needs

as opposed to desires to avoid spiralling capital and
operating costs that create excessive/unsustainable
financial burdens.
Outline the specific components of the facility:

Describe the primary activity spaces required

Identify the secondary and support areas to

be accommodated ie car park, viewing areas,
reception/ foyer areas, ablutions, kiosk, sports

LOCATION RATIONALE
Joint Use and Co-location
Consider whether existing facilities could be extended
or upgraded for use on a shared basis. If this is not
possible and a new facility is required, you should plan
in consultation with other facility providers to ensure
minimum duplication and maximum use of resources.
Consider the possibility of co-locating the proposed
facility with other community or commercial facilities. If
properly integrated, this approach can work to create a
hub within your community, centralising facilities in a
village concept. Co-location with other major providers
will maximise service and social outcomes and provide
opportunities to reduce capital and operating costs.
Discuss your proposal with the Department of
Education and Training, local agencies and
groups, commercial organisations, neighbouring

Feasibility Study Guide

12

local governments and other State and Federal

government agencies to explore opportunities to colocate and share provision and/or use of facilities.
Site Suitability and Specifications
Usually, location and cost will dictate the choice of
site. However, when considering a site for a sport or
recreation facility, you should assess site suitability.
The following considerations should be addressed:

If you intend using an existing building, assess its

capacity and suitability for conversion. This may
require a Building Surveyors Assessment.

For a new facility, carry out a site analysis to

determine:

13

Zoning regulations and LGA planning

restrictions

Ownership of the land and cost to purchase

or lease the site

Historical value or heritage significance

Any bearing to aboriginal sites legislation.

Accessibility for motor vehicles, public

transport, pedestrians and cyclists

Visual exposure

Social impact opportunities for integration

with community and commercial facilities

Proximity to the catchment area and

potential user groups

Size provision for car parking, potential for

expansion

Existing structures and their usage

Surface and sub-surface conditions (geo

technical, acid sulphate soil, contaminated
sites legislation)

Environmental considerations

Meteorological conditions

Availability of building materials and

mobilisation costs

Road use impact

State government planning restrictions

(i.e. bush forever)

Carry out a site survey to determine:

Site specifications

Grading

Topography

Feasibility Study Guide

Vegetation

Existing pollution and/or contamination

Location of utilities and services

Assess the preferred orientation for the facility

within the site boundaries.

Match the building to the site, ensuring the desired

activity inter-relationships can be accommodated.

Note: It is acknowledged that the site for the proposed

facility may be predetermined due to the limited
availability of land. However, it is still recommended
that the above considerations be addressed to ensure
the best use is made of the site.

DESIGN/TECHNICAL
EVALUATION
Technical Aspects
It is important to test the practicability of the technical
aspects of the concept design. This will ensure that
energy use/consumption, maintenance of all technical
systems and utilities (i.e. lighting, airconditioning,
heating, sanitation and filtration systems for swimming
pools, reticulation, water pumps and bores) and
ongoing operational costs are investigated and that the
most practical and cost effective options are selected
based on Life Cycle Costing guidelines3.
When undertaking this exercise, engage the expertise
of an engineer to provide professional assistance and
discuss the proposal with industry peak bodies.
Refer to existing facilities for relevant performance
and maintenance records. This process will ensure
that you are aware of the financial, management and
maintenance implications of the technical design
aspects of the proposed facility.
Note: A comprehensive energy audit should not be
undertaken until the project enters the design phase.
For further information refer to the Department of Sport
and Recreation publications Life Cycle Cost Guidelines
and Asset Management Guide.

CAPITAL COSTS

FINANCIALS

Capital Costs

Meeting the capital cost is only the starting point

of funding a facility. Operating costs represent the
ongoing financial obligation that will need to be met.
Estimate operational costs over the long term to
determine the viability of the proposed facility. Refer
to the Department of Sport and Recreation publication
Life Cycle Cost Guidelines.

Detail the estimated capital costs of the proposed

options for the facility. A cost planner or quantity
surveyor should prepare a cost plan showing the
following items:

Acquisition of land and site surveys

Site preparation

Construction costs including provision for cost

escalation

Technical systems and utilities

Fixed equipment and furniture (non-fixed items are

budgeted separately).

Access roads and support facilities

Consultants fees and planning costs

Administration and legal costs

Contingency.

Sources of Capital Funding

Operating Income
Operating income should be estimated based on
usage estimates (refer page 10) and anticipated
enrolments in programs (refer page 11).
To estimate operating income, include revenue from:

Program fees

Facility hire charges

Membership fees

Kiosk and sports shop sales

Equipment rental

Vending and game machines

Identify potential sources of capital funding such as:

Advertising space within the proposed facility

Local government funds

Grants and donations

State and commonwealth government grants

Sponsorship

Sale of land or existing facilities

Council operating subsidy

Contributions from potential user groups

Debt funding

Joint development and management agreements

Note: In order to estimate income and operating costs,

obtain the above information from other similar sport
or recreation facilities. Be conservative in estimating
income and liberal in estimating expenses.

Fund-raising activities

Donations of materials and services

Bequests

Sponsorship

Private sector developers (PPPs)

For further information refer to the Department of Sport

and Recreation publication Life Cycle Cost Guidelines.

Operating Expenditure
Operating expenses should be broken down into fixed
costs and variable costs.
Fixed costs: Incurred whether the facility is being
used or not, (i.e. permanent operational staff,
insurance, taxes, interest and depreciation).
Variable costs: Expenses that are incurred when the
facility is being used, ie utilities, program staff, fuel and
supplies.
Financial projections should be made for a five to 20
year period (five years for small and medium size
projects and 20 years for larger projects). To estimate
operating expenditure, include costs relating to:

Feasibility Study Guide

14

Staff salaries/wages and on-costs (for all nonprogram staff only)

Programs (include instructors wages, equipment

and material)

Administration

Auditing and insurance

Depreciation and loan servicing costs

Advertising and promotion

Technical systems and utilities

Cleaning/minor building maintenance/maintenance

of surrounds (allow additional funds for minor
alterations in the first 12 months of operation)

Major building maintenance

Cost of goods to be sold

Lease or rental of equipment and vending

machines

Contribution for centralised administration services

NOTE: In general, building maintenance costs to
meet changes in legislation are difficult to predict
and should be included in revised budgets when
they become apparent.

Financial Forecasts
Financial forecasts are required to determine whether
the proposed facility will be financially viable. For small
and medium size projects financial statements for the
first five years of operation are required. For large
scale projects additional financial statements for years
four to 20 are required (see Appendix B).
Prepare the following financial forecasts. Where
necessary, engage the expertise of a financial/legal
advisor for professional assistance.
Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statements Prepare monthly statements for year 1, quarterly for
years 2 and 3, and annually thereafter (see Appendix
C and D).
Sensitivity Analysis - Prepare annual statements for
years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Break Even Analysis. Prepare annual statements for
years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Cash Flow Considerations

The availability of funds throughout the planning,
design and construction phases are essential.
The following key points need to be determined:

15

Feasibility Study Guide

The accuracy of your estimated capital costs

When capital expenses will be due for payment.

Project your cash flow requirements for the design
and construction phases

The impact of foreseen increases in construction

costs on cash flow

How a debt will be retired

The capability of the community to meet fundraising

targets (the expertise of a professional fundraiser
may be engaged to determine this) and timeframe
required

The reliability of volunteer resources

When grant funds will be required

Sensitivity Analysis
A Sensitivity or What if analysis is used to
identify financial risks.

What if attendance is only 40%, 50% or 60%

of the projected amount.

What if the staff costs increase by 20%

What if the major competitor drops its prices

by 15%.

This exercise is crucial in assessing the financial

viability of the proposal. The worst-case scenario
needs to be budgeted for. Computer software is
available to undertake sensitivity analysis. Summarise
all forecasts and decide if the project is financially
viable.

STAGING ALTERNATIVES
It is cheaper to construct a facility in one stage.
However, if the capital and/or operating costs of the
proposed facility are beyond the means of your funding
sources, consider reducing the scale of the proposal,
or staging construction.
By staging the development, priority services can be
established first and their performance monitored
before committing additional funds. Additional services
and facilities can be provided when funds become
available. Staging is also a viable option when not all
desires/needs have demand at the same time.
Consider developing the proposed facility in stages
and assess the cost/ benefit implications of this
approach. State whether staging the development is
an appropriate option and why.
NOTE: DSR grant applications should identify priority
elements.

SUSTAINABILITY

Social

Sustainability is about making sure what you plan

to do today has a positive impact on the economic,
environment and social aspects of future generations.

Consider the impact a new facility will have on existing

social and leisure patterns (i.e. is it likely to create a
new focal point for community activity? Is it likely to
create new demands or trends? Will it impact on the
culture of the community?) Consider potential areas of
competition and complementation.

Ideally, when all three aspects are weighed up, the

net result should be seen as a benefit as opposed to
a cost. In other words, it should be expected that the
proposed facility would enhance the community in all
three sustainability elements.
Economic
The economic impact of developing the facility needs
to be considered. Is it likely to reduce/increase the
financial viability of another facility, club or business?
Are there external forces within the surrounding
environment which could inhibit/ enhance the facilitys
financial performance? Consider the following factors:

Existing and future competition

Economic cycles

Social trends

Emerging population demographics

Consider any proposed industrial and commercial

developments which may influence the demand for the
proposed facility and the types of opportunities it will
offer. Information may be obtained from:

Local government Authority development and

building applications.

Department of Commerce and Trade

Australian Bureau of Statistics

Department for Planning and Infrastructure

Research undertaken by Universities and

Professional Associations.

Refrain from using outdated information when making

future predictions.
Undertake a risk assessment to evaluate the degree of
risk associated with developing the proposed facility in
light of predicted economic forces. When undertaking
this exercise professional assistance should be sought.
Environmental
Will the new facility consider the principles of shared
use and co-location? Will global sustainability
benchmarks be met in the planning and development
of facilities? Responding to energy, waste and water
conservation issues needs to also be considered,
preferably using an ecological footprint or sustainability
assessment analysis.

REVISIT THE NEEDS

ASSESSMENT
Re-visit the findings of the needs assessment to
confirm that the finished proposal will meet the basic
sport and recreation requirements of the community. It
is not difficult for a proposal to get off-track during the
course of its development and stray from its original
objective.
Consider the relationship of the proposal to the future
development of the municipality, sport or region.
Critically examine how the facility will assist the client/s
group to achieve its vision.
Check that any other developments that may have
occurred since the feasibility commenced will not
detract from the success of your proposal.

RECOMMENDATIONS
The information that has been gathered and assessed
should be summarised to enable an objective decision
regarding the proposal.
The summary should include the following
components:

State the most appropriate response in meeting

the sport and recreation requirements of the
community.

State the recommendations of the draft

management plan.

Outline the details of the concept design and the

preferred site.

State the capital cost of the project and possible

sources of capital funds.

Outline the financial viability of the proposed facility.

Detail the economic, environmental and social

viability of the proposed facility.

Recommend to implement/amend/postpone/stage/
abandon the proposal.

Recommend time frames for the projects next

stage/s and outline why these have been chosen.

Feasibility Study Guide

16

6.0 Writing The Feasibility Study

Components of the feasibility study

Practical hints

Record the details of the study process in the order

in which it was done. Use the headings of the key
components to set out your report.

Consider the following practical hints when writing the

report:

Present information in a logical order.

Use headings and sub-headings throughout the

report.

Keep it simple, concise and easy-to-read. Where

possible, refrain from using industry jargon.

Dont be selective and dont repeat information

unnecessarily.

Support your claims and use examples.

Executive summary

Background and methodology

Organisational philosophy

Market analysis

Justification of the proposed facility

Draft management plan

Concept design

Location rationale

Design/technical evaluation

Capital costs

Financials

Staging Alternatives

Sustainability

Re-visit the Needs Assessment

Independent peer review

Recommendations

It is desirable to obtain an independent review/

assessment of the feasibility study, especially if
considering a large-scale project. The review should
be undertaken by an independent (unrelated) person
or organisation with relevant expertise and experience
and should address the following points:

Executive summary
The executive summary is usually found at the
beginning of the report or may be presented as a
separate document. It should be able to stand alone
from the rest of the report. The executive summary
should include:

An overview of the proposed development.

A summary of the major findings of the feasibility

study.

A suggested future direction and proposed action.

Acknowledgements.

Appendices
Include any survey results, interview results, site visit
reports, minutes of public meetings, technical reports,
professional advice and/or other research, which is
referred to, or support claims made within the study.

The rationale behind the justification for

the proposed facility
Is the provision of the proposed facility the
best way of meeting the communitys needs for
sport and recreation services? Has the merit
of other feasible options been objectively and
comprehensively considered?

The practicability of the draft

management plan
Is the proposed management approach workable,
achievable and cost effective? Does the
management plan target the findings of market
analysis?

17

Feasibility Study Guide

The suitability of the concept design and

location
Does the proposed concept design and site
accommodate the management plan in the best
possible way? Within the design, have the most
practical and energy efficient technical systems
been chosen? Does the building structure suit the
climate?

The validity of the assumptions/

projections included within the study
Are there risks concerning the assumptions upon
which the usage and financial projections are
based? Is the degree of risk significant? How can
the risk be mitigated?

The economic, environmental and social

viability of the proposal
What impact will the proposed facility have on
external economic, environment and social
systems? Will the net affect benefit the community?

The recommendations
Are the recommendations supported by the
findings of the study?

Feasibility Study Guide

18

7.0 Conclusion
The feasibility study should provide all the information
required to make a decision to support or reject a
proposal to develop a sport or recreation facility. This
decision will have long-term ramifications for the
community and, therefore, it is important that the study
is comprehensive and objective.
The feasibility study is a means to an end. That end is
the involvement of the community in determining how
and when collectively owned funds are going to be
spent to provide opportunities for sport and recreation
experiences.
Through undertaking a feasibility study the chances of
developing an unsuccessful facility are minimised, and
the potential for efficiency is increased.
A good feasibility study is the clients best
insurance against a poor investment!

19

Feasibility Study Guide

8.0 Further Reading

1. Daly, J. (2000). Recreation and sport planning and design. Human Kinetics.
2. Department of Sport and Recreation. (2004). Asset management guide: sport and recreation facilities. Perth, Western
Australia: Western Australian Government.
3. Department of Sport and Recreation. (2007). Decision-making guide: sport and recreation facilities. Perth, Western
Australia: Western Australian Government.
4. Department of Sport and Recreation. (2007). Facility planning guide: sport and recreation facilities. Perth, Western
Australia: Western Australian Government.
5. Department of Sport and Recreation. (2005). Life cycle cost guidelines: sport and recreation facilities. Perth, Western
Australia: Western Australian Government.
6. Rawlinsons. (2007). Australian construction handbook 2007. Perth, Western Australia: Rawlhouse Publishing Pty Ltd.

Feasibility Study Guide

20

9.0 References
1. Ballesty, S., Orlovic, M. (2004). Life cycle costing and facility management. Facility Management 12 (2) p.32.
2. The Local Government Act [Amendment] 1995 (WA)
3. Department of Sport and Recreation. (2005). Life cycle cost guidelines: sport and recreation facilities. Perth, Western
Australia: Western Australian Government.

21

Feasibility Study Guide

APPENDIX A
CURRENT TRENDS AND ISSUES IN SPORT AND RECREATION
Some of the major trends and issues affecting the development of sport and recreation within Western Australia include:

Changes in the nature of international and national

economies, creating major challenges for the
Commonwealth and States in improving program
managements and funding flexibility.

An increase in entertainment and spectator sport,

eco-tourism and adventure-based activities and a
demand for facilities and services that offer value
for money.

Individuals recognising the importance of sport and

recreation within their lives and making choices
based on a sport and recreation lifestyle.

The need for providers to incorporate and cater to

the many interests and needs of a multi-cultural
society.

Increasing expectation by the community for

Government to provide leadership and stability.

People looking for new challenges and

opportunities that add quality to their lives.

A greater awareness of legal rights and the

importance of safety, public liability and risk
management.

Local communities wanting and having more say in

the decision-making processes.

The impact of National Competition Policy and the

requirements of the WA Local Government Act.

Address the growing needs and requirements of

the ageing baby boomers population.

The requirement for an improved strategic

approach to regional sport and recreation planning
and provision.

Government planning policies such as Liveable

Neighbourhoods, Network City, Bush Forever are
having negative outcomes for sport and recreation
outcomes.

Inflexible and inappropriate access restrictions

such as water catchments, bush forever are
reducing the recreational access to the natural
environment.

Land-use planning is providing inadequate priority

to recreational needs, particularly in urban growth
areas.

Access to existing school facilities is difficult to

achieve compared to planning for new schools.

Increased densities in inner urban areas placing

pressure on existing sport and recreation facilities.

Increased participation in sport and a range of

recreational activities which require less structured
and alternative delivery systems. This provides
challenges and opportunities for established sport
associations and groups.

The need for agencies to become more efficient

and effective in their operations.

The demand on sport to meet changing community

needs which requires sport associations to be
more responsive and flexible and to improve
their management structures, capabilities and
deliverables.

Pressures on volunteer managed sport clubs and

competition from professional providers.

An increase in co-operative and integrated

approaches to the planning and provision of
services and facilities.

More sophisticated and costly facilities being built,

older facilities being regenerated and more colocated and jointly provided facilities.

Greater competition among providers for the same

markets.

The need for sport, recreation and physical

eduction to have a priority in the education system.

Feasibility Study Guide

22

APPENDIX B
FEASIBILITY STUDY CONTENT AND RESEARCH REQUIREMENT GUIDELINES FOR DIFFERENT
SCALE PROJECTS
SMALL

Review
Background
information

MEDIUM

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

(UP TO $150,000)

($150,000 - $500,000)

($500,000 - $10,000,000)

Development plan
organisational

Strategic recreation plan

organisational

Organisational policies
and plans

Corporate policies and

plans

Needs assessment

Sport and recreation

needs assessment
Facility specific needs
assessment (optional)

Strategic recreation
plan regional and
organisational
Corporate policies and
plans
Sport and recreation needs
assessment
Facility specific needs
assessment

Organisational

Values and aims

Values and aims

Values and aims

Philosophy

Desired outcomes

Desired outcomes

Desired outcomes

Policy and strategy

Policy and strategy

Policy and strategy

Competition analysis

Socio-demographic data

Socio-demographic data

Community consultation

Competition analysis

Competition analysis

Demongraphic data

Community consultation

Community consultation

Justification of
the proposed
facility

Review need
identification process/
needs assessment

Review need identification

process/ needs
assessment

Review need identification

process/ needs
assessment

Draft

Usage estimates

Management structure

Management structure

Management

Programs and services

Usage estimates

Usage estimates

Staffing

Programs and services

Programs and services

Staffing

Staffing

Marketing strategy

Marketing strategy

Finance and admin

Finance and admin

Maintenance

Maintenance

Market Analysis

Plan

23

LARGE

Feasibility Study Guide

Concept Design

Location
Rationale

Design/ Technical
Practicability

SMALL

MEDIUM

LARGE

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

(UP TO $150,000)

($150,000 - $500,000)

($500,000 - $10,000,000)

Core elements

Core elements

Core elements

Management needs

Management needs

Management needs

Functional requirements

Functional requirements

Functional requirements

Plan / layout

Plan and layout

Plan and layout

Finishes

Finishes

Finishes

Sustainable elements

Sustainable elements

Environmental

Joint use and co-location

Joint use and co-location

Statutory and planning

regulations

Environmental

Environmental

Accessibility

Statutory planning and

regulations

Statutory planning and

regulations

Demographic

Cultural and heritage

Cultural and heritage

Accessibility

Accessibility

Demographic

Demographic

Social impact integration

Social impact integration

Transport

Transport

Plant and technical

systems

Plant and technical systems

Evaluation of technical
design options

Evaluation of technical
design options

Capital Costs

Operating Income
and Expenditure

Evaluation of technical
design options

Capital cost estimates

Capital cost estimates

Capital cost estimates

Sources of capital funds

Sources of capital funds

Sources of capital funds

Capital cash flow

Capital cash flow

Capital cash flow

Life-cycle analysis

Life-cycle analysis

Financial forecasts
1 to 3 years

Financial forecasts
5 years

Financial forecasts
20 years

Cash flow analysis

Cash flow analysis

Cash flow analysis

Profit and loss

Profit and loss

Profit and loss

Breakeven analysis

Breakeven analysis

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis
Life-cycle analysis

Staging Alternatives

N/a

Staging options

Staging options

Capital cost estimates

Capital cost estimates

Feasibility Study Guide

24

Economic,

SMALL

MEDIUM

LARGE

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

(UP TO $150,000)

($150,000 - $500,000)

($500,000 - $10,000,000)

Environmental and

Economic forecast
external

Economic forecast
external/internal

Economic forecast
external/external

Social Viability

Risk assessment

Risk assessment

Risk assessment

Social/cultural impact

Social/cultural impact

Social/cultural impact

Environmental impact
Re-visit Needs
Assessment

Proposal addresses
identified needs

Proposal addresses
identified needs

Proposal addresses
identified needs

Relevant to organisational Relevant to organisational

vision
vision

Recommendations

Option selection

Option selection

Option selection

Recommendations

Recommendations

Recommendations

Refer to DSRs Decision Making Guide Sustainability Matrix Asessment Guidelines for further assistance.

25

Feasibility Study Guide

APPENDIX C
SAMPLE PROJECTED PROFIT AND LOSS PRO FORMA
1st Qtr

2nd Qtr

3rd Qtr

4th Qtr

Ongoing

INCOME
Program Fees
Room Hire
Kiosk / Bar sales
Proshop Sales
Vending Machine Sales
Pay Phone
Fundraising
Sponsorship
Donations
Grants
Other
Total Income/Gross Profit [A]
EXPENSES
Employees wages
Equipment
Advertising
Stationery/Office Supplies
Printing and Postage
Telephone/fax
Power
Kiosk/bar stock
Proshop stock
Vending machine stock
Freight
Building maintenance
Vehicle
Security
Insurance
Loan/lease repayments
Other
Total Expenses
Net profit/loss

[B]
[A-B]

Depreciation
Net profit/loss after depreciation

Feasibility Study Guide

26

APPENDIX E
GLOSSARY OF PLANNING TERMS

27

TERM

DEFINITION

Capital Costs

Costs associated with planning, establishing and

constructing the facility

Client

The owner of the facility

Co-Location

Locating/integrating two or more facilities on the

same or adjacent sites

Community Consultation

The process of involving/communicating with

stakeholders, potential user groups and other
community groups and individuals within the
facility planning process

Concept Design

Preliminary drawings/illustrations of the facility

which convey the concept of the project. Indicates
facility components, approximate dimensions and
technical systems

Concept Plan

The phase of the feasibility study which develops

the concept of the project. Includes: facility
justification; market analysis; draft management
plan; concept design and location rationale

Contract Documentation

The various legal documents and briefs which

detail the contractual agreement between the
client and the builder/construction company

Design Brief

A set of instructions from the client to the

designer/design team outlining what the client
expects the facility to provide. It governs the
design and construction of the facility.

Design Development

The detailed development of the schematic

design of the facility. Includes an independent
energy audit, firming up capital costs and a
comprehensive design development report.

Facility Components

The various spaces/functional areas within the

main structure of the facility

Feasibility Study Guide

TERM

DEFINITION

Facility Planning Process

The entire/complete process of planning a

facility, incorporating the five key phases: needs
assessment; feasibility study; design; construction
and post-occupancy evaluation

Facility Specific Needs Assessment

An in-depth assessment of the need for a

particular type of recreation facility. Usually
required to justify the need for large complex
facilities. Undertaken prior to embarking on a
feasibility study

Feasibility Analysis

The phase of the feasibility study which tests

the workability/practicability/cost effectiveness/
economic and social impact of the concept plan

Feasibility Study

A critical assessment of a proposal to build

or upgrade a facility. Incorporates concept
planning and feasibility analysis. Enables an
informed decision about whether to proceed with
developing the proposed project.

Location Rationale

The process of assessing and selecting the most

suitable site for the facility. Includes a site analysis
and a site survey.

Management Plan

An outline and discussion of management issues

providing direction on how the facility will be
managed and utilised. Can be prepared for a
proposed or existing facility. In the case of the
proposed facility, a draft management plan is
prepared as part of the Feasibility Study. The
management plan is further developed if and
when the project enters the design phase.

Market Analysis

An analysis of the social and economic fabric

within the facilitys catchment area. Includes an
assessment of socio-demographic characteristics,
participation trends and of other providers of
similar services/facilities.

Feasibility Study Guide

28

29

TERM

DEFINITION

Needs Assessment

A research study which aims to identify any lack

or over supply of recreation facilities and services,
to indicate what is required. May be generic or
facility specific.

Organisational Philosophy

The values of the client organisation which

support the provision of the facility

Post Construction Analysis

A study undertaken once a facility is operational.

Its purpose is to compare projections/assumptions
made in the Feasibility Study against the actual
performance of the facility and to explain any
variances.

Risk Assessment

The process of identifying, rating and evaluating

risks with a view to eliminating or reducing them.

Social Viability

An assessment of the social impact of the facility

with a view to achieving a net gain/benefit.

Schematic Design

Scaled detailed working drawings produced by a

professional designer/architect. Usually includes a
cost plan details of associated capital costs.

Stakeholders

Those parties which have an interest in the facility.

Strategic Planning

An organisational planning approach which

identifies a future direction and vision, and
strategies for achievement.

Strategic Recreation Plan

A clearly documented and approved plan of

intentions that will guide policy and programs
achieving sport and recreation provision. Includes
corporate aims and objectives, a review of
existing provision, an assessment of needs and
opportunities, and proposed developments.

Technical Systems

Those engineered aspects of the facility design

which control the various functions of the facility
[ie lighting, airconditioning, heating, sanitation and
filtration, reticulation etc].

Terms of Reference

The parameters/limitations of a study or contract.

Feasibility Study Guide

Notes

Feasibility Study Guide

30

PERTH

GREAT SOUTHERN

PILBARA

WHEATBELT

246 Vincent Street

PO Box 329
LEEDERVILLE WA 6903
Telephone 9492 9700
Facsimile 9492 9711
[email protected]
www.dsr.wa.gov.au

22 Collie Street
ALBANY WA 6330
Telephone 9892 0100
Facsimile 9892 0199
[email protected]

1 Welcome Road
PO Box 941
KARRATHA WA 6714
Telephone 9182 2100
Facsimile 9182 2199
[email protected]

NORTHAM
McIver House
297 Fitzgerald Street
PO Box 55
NORTHAM WA 6401
Telephone 9690 2400
Facsimile 9690 2499
[email protected]

KIMBERLEY

PEEL

4 Francis Street
PO Box 140
CARNARVON WA 6701
Telephone 9941 0900
Facsimile 9941 0999
[email protected]

Government Offices
Cnr Konkerberry Drive and
Messmate Way
PO Box 1127
KUNUNURRA WA 6743
Telephone 9166 4900
Facsimile 9166 4999
[email protected]

GOLDFIELDS

MID WEST

SOUTH WEST

106 Hannan Street

PO Box 1036
KALGOORLIE WA 6430
Telephone 9022 5800
Facsimile 9022 5899
[email protected]

Mid West Sports House

77 Marine Terrace
PO Box 135
GERALDTON WA 6531
Telephone 9956 2100
Facsimile 9956 2199
[email protected]

80A Blair Street

PO Box 2662
Bunbury, WA 6231
Telephone 9792 6900
Facsimile 9792 6999
[email protected]

GASCOYNE

Suite 3, The Endeavour Centre

94 Mandurah Terrace
PO Box 1445
MANDURAH WA 6210
Telephone 9550 3100
Facsimile 9550 3199
[email protected]

Some images kindly provided by the Albany Advertiser Pty Ltd.

NARROGIN
John Higgins Centre
Clayton Road
PO Box 54
NARROGIN WA 6312
Telephone 9890 0400
Facsimile 9890 0499
[email protected]