0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views3 pages

Assignment 3-MTH101

This document provides proofs for exercises from Chapter 2 of Gallian's book on abstract algebra. It includes proofs for 36 problems, with many denoted as "DIY" or "proof omitted" since the full proofs are not shown. The document also provides context that in Gallian's book, Zn or U(n) is denoted without a bar, but the reader should think of these sets with a bar whenever working with the book. It gives a full proof for problem 5 to show that the inverse of 3 in Z11 is 4.

Uploaded by

Vinod Gour
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views3 pages

Assignment 3-MTH101

This document provides proofs for exercises from Chapter 2 of Gallian's book on abstract algebra. It includes proofs for 36 problems, with many denoted as "DIY" or "proof omitted" since the full proofs are not shown. The document also provides context that in Gallian's book, Zn or U(n) is denoted without a bar, but the reader should think of these sets with a bar whenever working with the book. It gives a full proof for problem 5 to show that the inverse of 3 in Z11 is 4.

Uploaded by

Vinod Gour
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Assignment 3-MTH101

Following are the exercises from Chapter 2 of Gallians book: Problem 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15,
17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 36.
In Gallians book, Zn or U (n) is denoted without a bar . Whenever you are reading the book, always
think of the set Zn or U (n) with a bar.
3. Show that {1, 2, 3} is not a group under multiplication modulo 4 is not a group but that {1, 2, 3, 4}
under multiplication modulo 5 is a group.
Proof. You can draw a Cayley table or observe that 2 does not have a multiplicative inverse. For the second
part draw a Cayley table or observe that each of the numbers 1,2,3,4 is relatively prime or co-prime to 5.
This is because 5 is a prime number. If x denotes one of these numbers, then there are two integers a, b such
that xa + 5b = 1. Then taking the bar on both the sides and noticing that 5 = 0, we get xa = 1.
For the closure: if x, y are in the set, then by definition x.y := xy, and this is not equal to 0 as both x, y
are co-prime to 5. Associative law is clear and for identity observe that if x.y = y, then xy = y. This implies
that xy y = 0. Therefore 5 divides xy y = (x 1)y. 5 being a prime divides one of y or x 1. Notice
that y is co-prime to 5, so 5 divides x 1. Hence x = 1. Therefore 1 is the identity element in this set.
You can also simply say that 1 is in the set and x.1 = x for all the elements x, and hence 1 is an identity
element. Therefore the set of four elements is a group under multiplication.
4.

Proof.

1
0

 
1
0
,
1
1

1
0


do not commute.

5.
Proof.
10 18
 det = 
 = 3, and
 3 has a multiplicative inverse in Z11 which is 3
5 6
5 6
1
3
=4
.
3 2
3 2

= 4. The inverse is

6.
Proof. Follows from the problem 4.
7.
Proof. Convert all multiplication into addition and inverses into minus. For example, b. a2 (b1 c)2 becomes
2(a) + 2(b + c).
8.
Proof. (a1 ba)n = (a1 ba).(a1 ba). .(a1 ba), repeated n times. Notice then we can rearrange the brackets by using associativity. Then the as cancel out and we finally get the answer.
10.
Proof. Recall that two functions f and g on a set X are the same, i.e., f = g if f (y) = g(y) for all the
elements y X. Here we want to show that the functions Ta,b Tc,d is equal to the function Ta+c T b + d. So
we apply this function on the element (x, y) in R2 . We have (Ta,b Tc,d )(x, y) = Ta,b (Tc,d (x, y)) = Ta,b (x +
c, y + d) = (x + a + c, y + b + d) = Ta+c,b+d (x, y). This is true for all the elements of R2 . Therefore
Ta,b Tc,d = T a + c, b + d.
1

11.
Proof. DIY.
12.
Proof. +1 and 1 are two elements that satisfy the equation. Notice that +1 6= 1. Suppose if this happens,
then 2 = 0, so n|2. Therefore n 2, which is a contradiction.
14.
Proof. To show that: xy = yx for all x, y G.
ETP: y 1 xy = x.
DIY.
15.
Proof. No this is not true for non-Abelian groups. I challenge you to find an example of a non-abelian group
with this property.
17.
Proof. This has two parts: If G is abelian, then (ab)(a1 b1 ) = e.
Conversely: If (ab)1 = (a1 b1 ), then 1 = (ab)(a1 b1 ) = a(ba1 )b1 . Hence a1 b = ba1 , and
ba = ab. Therefore G is abelian.
18.
Proof. DIY.
19
Proof. DIY
20
1
1 1
Proof. (a1 a2 an )1 = a1
n an1 a2 a1 .

26
Proof. ba = a1 a2 b2 b1 = ab.
27
Proof. DIY.
28
Proof. DIY
29
Proof. Clearly, e satisfies the equation. If a is another solution, then a2 also satisfies the equation. Therefore,
the set of solutions is {e} {a1 , a21 } {a2 , a22 } {an , a2n }. Try to show that these are disjoint sets. Notice
that the number of elements can only be odd.
30

Proof. A function f on a set X is one-one if f (x) = f (y) implies x = y. In other words, assume that
f (x) = f (y) and conclude by a series of equalities that x = y. You can also assume that x 6= y and show
that f (x) 6= f (y).
Now, g (x) = g (y) = gxg 1 = gyg 1 = x = y. For onto, you have to produce a pre-image for
every element in the co-domain, which is G itself here. It is easy to see that the preimage of any element
b G is g 1 bg G.
31.
Proof. DIY
32.
Proof. (ab)2 = e = ba = a1 b1 = ab, since a2 = e = b2 .
35.
Proof. DIY
36.
Proof. DIY.

You might also like