AN INTRODUCTIONMcGraw-Hill Higher Education 37
seCraw-Hill Capris,
NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS
Published by InviaMoGraw-Hil, an imprint of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 1221 Avenue ot
the Amencas. New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2001, by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All
Fights reserved. No pat ofthis publication may bé Teproduced or distributed in any form or by any
‘means, or stored in a database or rival syst, without the prior witen consent of The
eGraw-Hil Companies, ne. inluding, But not fried to, i any network or ether electronic
storage or ransmission, or broadcast for distance leaming.
‘This book is printed on acc-roe paper.
1294567890 FGRFORO9876543210
ISON 0-07-291677-2
Editorin-chiet: Gary Burke
Senior sponscring editor: Lucile Suton
Editorial assistant: Joanna Honkman
Marketing maragor: Nelson Black
Project manayor. David Sutton
roducton supervisor: Pam Augspurger
‘Supplement coordinator: Louis Swaim
Gover dosign: Susan Newnan Design, nc
Camgesior Shepherd nc.
‘Typetace: 10/12 Palatino
Pnter: Fairfield Graphics, tne
Lorry of Congress Cataloging n-Publcation Data
Field, Barry ©.
‘Natural resource economics : an introduction / Barry C. Feld
p. om
Inludes index
ISBN 0.07-231677-2 (ak. paper)
1 Natural sources, 2. Environmental poly. 3. Sustainable development, Tie
cas £54 2000
3887-4021 00-038076
hetp aw mte.comABOUT THE AUTHOR
Barry C. Field is Professor of Resource Economics at the University of Massa-
chusetts in Amherst. Previously he taught at the University of Miami and The
George Washington University. He received his BS. and MS. degrees from
Cornell University, and his Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.
At the University of Massachusetts he has devoted many years to teaching
natural resource economics to students at all levels, and has worked to de-
velop an undergraduate major in environmental and resource economics.
Professor Field is the author of numerous articles on resource and environ-
‘mental economics.SECTION |
CONTENTS
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION r
Important Issuas in Natural Resource Economics
NATURAL RESOURCE ADEQUACY
‘SOCIALLY OPTIMAL RATES OF RESOURCE USE
IDENTIFYING THE SOURCES OF NATURAL RESOURCE
MISMANAGEMENT
PRESERVATION VS. EXTRACTION: VALUATION OF
THE ALTERNATIVES
PROPERTY RIGHTS ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
THE USE OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS IN NATURAL
IESOURCE DECISIONS
LAND.USE ISSUES:
NATURAL RESOURCE ACCOUNTING
INTERNATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCE CONFLICTS
NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY
‘Natural Resources and the Economy
SOME TERMINOLOGY
‘THE RANGE OF NATURAL RESOURCE SERVICES
MODELING RESOURCE SERVICES
“4
16
18
1°
a
2
24
ar
2aconrents
SECTION I
3
SECTION II,
6
SOME WORDS ABOUT ECONOMICS
THE POLITICAL UNIT PROBLEM
SUMMARY
BUILDING BLOCKS.
Wilingness to Pay/Oemand
WILLINGNESS TO PAY
DISCOUNTING
SUMMARY
Costs/Supply
‘OPPORTUNITY cost
cost cuAvEs
‘THE SHAPES OF COST CURVES
MARGINAL COSTS AND SUPPLY
TAXES AS COSTS
SUMMARY 7
Efficiency and Sustainability
STATIC EFFICIENCY
DYNAMIC (INTERTEMPORAL) EFFICIENCY
IST APPROPRIATE TO DISCOUNT?
EFFICIENCY AND INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY: THE ISSUE
(OF SUSTAINABILITY i
SUMMARY
GENERAL NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES
Markets and Eificiancy
MARKET DEMAND AND SUPPLY
MARKETS AND STATIC SOCIAL EFFICIENCY
MARKETS AND INTERTEMPORAL EFFICIENCY
SUMMARY
Public
Policy for Natural Resources
‘THE OBJECTIVES OF PUBLIC POLICY
TYPES OF PUBLIC POLICIES
PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS
a
35
39
a
ges
87
58
62
85
86
ov
70
n
73
78
8
a
8
st
101
103
08
107
110GOVERNMENT. SPONSORED INCENTIVE POLICIES 15
DIRECT CONTROLS na
DIRECT PUBLIC PRODUCTION 120
MARKET FAILURE/GOVERNMENT FAILURE 21
POLICY CENTRALIZATION/DECENTRALIZATION va
suMMaRy 128
SECTIONIV. NATURAL RESOURCE ANALYSIS: 127
8 Principles of Analysis 128
IMPACT ANALYSIS 18
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS 132
BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS 132
SUMMARY 148
©The Valuation of Natural Resources 151
MEASURING BENEFITS 152
ACTIVE (USE) BENEFITS 153
NONUSE (PASSIVE) BENEFITS 159
MEASURING COSTS 163
SUMMARY 168
SECTION V. APPLIED NATURAL RESOURCE PROBLEMS 172
10 Mineral Economics 173
GEOLOGICAL FACTORS AND COSTS OF EXTRACTION 174
EXTRACTION ECONOMICS FOR A KNOWN STOCK 178
RESOURCE EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT 182
NONFENEWABLE RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABILITY 184
MINERALS PRICES IN FACT. 186
U.S. MINERAL IMPORT DEPENDENCE 188,
OTHER POLICY ISSUES 191
THE ECONOMICS OF RECYCLING 192
SUMMARY 196
1 Energy 199
ENERGY USE IN THE UNITED STATES: CONSUMPTION
[AND PRICES 200
‘THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ENERGY MARKETS. 202
‘THE QUESTION OF ENERGY ADEQUACY 208
THE ECONOMICS OF ENERGY SELF-SUFFICIENCY 205contents:
cry
13
4
18
ENERGY CONSERVATION
ECONOMICS OF CAFE STANDARDS
ECONOMIC ISSUES IN ELECTRICITY DEREGULATION
‘SUNMARY
Forest Economics
FOREST HARVEST DECISIONS
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR FORESTRY
‘TIMBER HARVESTING FROM NATIONAL FORESTS
SUMMARY
Marine Resources
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN MARINE FISHERIES
U.S. FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS
MODELING A FISHERY
EFFICIENT RATES OF EFFORT
THE PROBLEM OF OPEN ACCESS
APPROACHES TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
UNCERTAINTY AND FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
SUMMARY
Land Economics
SOCIAL EFFICIENCY IN LAND USE
LAND MARKETS AND PRICES
PUBLIC POLICIES AND LAND USE
LAND-USE ECONOMICS AND THE “TAKINGS" ISSUE
LAND RENT AND PRICE GRADIENTS
THE ECONOMICS OF URBAN SPRAWL
LANO MANAGEMENT ISSUES ON THE URBAN/RURAL FRINGE
LAND USE IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENTS
MANAGING PUBLIC LANDS.
SUMMARY
Water Resources
WATER USE IN THE UNITED STATES
WATER LAW IN THE UNITED STATES
WATER PRICING
INVESTING IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
WATER RIGHTS TRANSFERS AND MARKETS.
INSTREAM FLOW PROTECTION
SUMMARY
210
213
215
219
222
224
237
238
230
242
aa
245
2a7
251
293
258
261
262
265
207
299
an
am
279
200
282
204
208
290
293
294
296
208
a
31616
wv
8
19
SECTION Vi.
Economics of Agriculture
HISTORICAL CHANGES IN SUPPLY AND DEMAND
INCOME SUPFOAT POLICIES IN AGRICULTURE
WETLANDS CONSERVATION
ECONOMICS OF PESTICIDE RESISTANCE
THE ECONOMICS OF MONOCULTURE
THE ECONOMICS OF SOIL PRODUCTIVITY
‘SUMMARY
Economics of Outdoor Recreation
‘THE DEMAND FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION
RATIONING USE
ECOTOURISN
SUMMARY
‘The Economics of Wildlife Management
WILDLIFE ECOLOGY AND HUMAN INSTITUTIONS
‘THE ECONOMICS OF SPORT HUNTING.
WILDLIFE IN SUBURBAN AREAS
DISTRIBUTIONAL ISSUES IN FESTORATION AND PREDATOR,
‘CONTROL
PUBLIC POLICY ANO WILDLIFE MARKETS
SUMMARY
‘The Economics of Biodiversity Preservation
‘THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
THE NOAH PROBLEM
(COST-EFFECTIVE BIODIVERSITY PRESERVATION
COSTS OF DIVERSITY PROTECTION
SUMMARY
NATURAL RESOURCES IN DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES
Natural Resources and Economic Growth
THE INSTITUTIONAL/DEMOGRAPHIC CONTENT
RESOURCES AND GROWTH: TWO PERSPECTIVES
HOW ECONOMIES GROW
NATURAL RESOURCE ACCOUNTING
334
298
38
341
34s
3e7
357
361
364
265
37
379
et
385
386
391
392
08
a3
416
417
410
420
423
426contents
21
‘THE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCE RENTS
THE VOLATILITY OF RESOURCE RENTS IN DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES
LAND RENTS AND LAND REFORM
PROJECT EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Natural Resource Decisions in Developing Countries
INCENTIVES AND POLITICAL POWER,
PROPERTY RIGHTS:
DEFORESTATION
‘SOIL EROSION AND SOIL PRODUCTIVITY
LOCAL AND NONLOGAL RESOURCE INTERESTS
‘SUMMARY
INDEX
428
492
493
437
aa
444
46
“a7
482
457
400
463
487PREFACE
(One of the major themes of human concern as we launch into the next millen-
rium is how we should shape and manage our relationship to the natural
world. On one side of the issue are those who believe that we are exhausting
and degrading natural resource endowments to such an extent that the future
welfare of the human community itself is threatened. On the other are those
‘who believe that the technological and institutional challenges of natural re-
source scarcity can be overcome given sufficient amounts of human effort and
ingenuity. Most people are probably somewhere in the middle: concerned but
hopeful
Wherever one stands on the ecological spectrum, itis clear that future out-
comes depend to a great extent on the human decisions that are made about
resource use. Natural resource economics represents one way of framing and
analyzing these decisions. By “analyze” we mean developing an understand~
ing of why resource Hecisions are made the way they are and how they might
be improved upon. Natural resource economics focuses on resource valwation,
economic incentives, and the institutional arrangements that will give us the
utilization and conservation decisions we want.
‘The basic structure of the book is to start out with a few preliminaries, then
cover some fundamental principles of economics, discuss how these principles
apply to the general question of natural resource use, and then move to a se-
ries of topical chapters—each of which treats a particular natural resource. Fi-
nally, the last two chapters look at natural resource issues as they are encoun-
tered in developing countries. There may be too many chapters to cover in a
single semester course. In this case it should be easy to cover the basies, andxiv PREFACE
then select the applications chapters that instructors and students find most
interesting and relevant.
Each chapter ends with a summary, list of key words, some questions for
further discussion, a brief reference to some sites on the worldwide web that
might be useful, and a short list of selected readings. Neither the selected
readings nor the web site lists are comprehensive in any way. Given the mas-
sive proliferation of sites on the web and the large scientific literature on nati-
ral resource issues, the lists at the end of each chapter can cite only a tiny frac-
tion of the material that students might find interesting and informative. They
are meant simply as a way to help students get their feet in the door, should
they want to push further with any of the ideas of the chapter.
in this sense the book is a companion to my earlier work, Environmental Eco-
nomics: An Introduction (McGraw-Hill, nd edition, 1997). The latter treats is
sues of environmental pollution and the management of environmental qual-
ity in the same fashion, and has found a wide audience. Its used primarily for
introductory courses, but on occasion also for more advanced courses. My
hope is that the present work will find the same niche.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Like most textbooks, this book is the result of many years’ teaching in the
classroom. So my deepest debt is to the thousands of students who have sat in
my classes over the years. Without their faces, reactions, and feedback, the
book could not have been written, and if [have been able to present the mate-
rial in a way future students find comprehensible and meaningful, it is all
these earlier students who can take most of the credit.
Many thanks to the economists who have read all or part of the manuscript
and offered their comments: Anne E. Bresnock, California State Polytechnic
University; Richard Bryant, University of Missouri; Nick Gomersall, Luther
College; Douglas Parker, University of Maryland; and Keith Willet, Oklahoma
State University. Their insights and reactions have made the book much better
than it would have been without them,
‘Very special thanks to the people who helped me produce the book: to Dar-
leen Siysz, for her incredible work with the word processor and keeping the
project organized, and to Eileen Keegan for her fine work with the graphics.
Thanks also to Lucille Sutton, Joanna Honikman, and David Sutton at
McGraw-Hill, who saw the book through to completion.
\— Finally, deep thanks and love to Martha, who read every word more than
once, who encouraged me onward, and who kept trying to explain to the kids
why dadcly had to write all those wordswow ONE
INTRODUCTION
‘This first section contains two introductory chapters. Chapter 1 offers a brief
tour through some of the major natural resource issues facing us today. The
objective is to become acquainted with them in commonsense terms before we
Iaunch into an analysis of these problems in later chapters. The second chapter
covers some of the essential terminology that will be used throughout the
book.CHAPTER,
IMPORTANT ISSUES IN
NATURAL RESOURCE
ECONOMICS
In this book we apply some relatively simple, but péwerful, economic princi-
piles to the study of natural resource conservation and use. The emphasis will
be on analysis: why resources are used as they are, and what specific steps can
be undertaken to use them at a rate that is socially beneficial for all. It may
sometimes seem that the emphasis is more on refining the analytical principles
than on applying them in useful ways. To underline the fact that the analytical
models are not of interest per se but merely allow us better to come to grips
with real-world problems, we start by taking a brief, descriptive excursion
through a number of important contemporary natural resource issues. The
aim, in other words, is to get an overview of the kinds of problems that are
dealt with in natural resource economics, before launching into the study of
the analytical tools that are brought to bear on them.
NATURAL RESOURCE ADEQUACY
‘The longest-running issue in natural resource economics is undoubtedly the
resource adequacy issue. Given that contemporary economies use relatively
large amounts of many types of natural resources as “inputs” to production
and consumption, we must ask ourselves a few serious questions: Will future
supplies of these resources be sufficient to support the economic needs of ourCOHAPTER 1 IMPORTANT ISSUES IVNATURAL RESOURCEECONOMICS 3
children, grandchildren, and succeeding generations indefinitely? Or will
natural resource shortages ultimately become so severe as to threaten, and
perhaps lead to a collapse of, future standards of living?
This is not a new concern. Before the industrial revolution, when economies
were tied more closely to local resource endowments, fears of local shortages
of items such as wood and water were very common. When the industrial rev-
olution did arrive, with its heavy reliance on coal, concern shifted to the possi-
bility that that resource, since it was nonrenewable, would grow scarce and
cause collapse.
Jin more recent years, the energy crisis of the 1970s provoked a great deal of
soul searching and dire commentary about resource scarcities and economic
collapse. It is true that modern economics uses prodigious amounts of energy
per unit of output; that is, they are very energy-intensive. But the runup of en-
ergy prices of the early 1970s was in fact a political phenomenon, not con-
nected at all with real scarcity factors, Furthermore, the price increases led to
very important amounts of energy conservation, as users sought ways to re-
duce their energy consumption, By 1990, unfortunately, few people still gave
‘much thought to energy conservation, sirice the real prices of such important
items as gasoline had declined to pre-1970s levels.
But the dilemma still remains. The largest part of the energy system of the
western world is based on nonrenewable resources: petroleum, coal, and natu-
ral gas. Has the inevitable crisis in energy supplies, and by extension other
critical natural resources, simply been pushed off into the future? There is
probably no way of answering this definitively to everybody's satisfaction.
People who think about the likelihood of a natural resource scarcity-induced
economic collapse tend to distribute themselves along a spectrum running
from extreme pessimism to extreme optimism.
The pessimist side goes back at least to Thomas Malthus, whose famous
treatise on population was based on the notion that human population growth
would inevitably outstrip the ability of nature to provide sustenance in ever-
increasing amounts.! In the early 1970s an influential work on the pessimist’s
side was published titled The Limits to Growth? This study used large-scale
‘computer simulation models with complicated feedback mechanisms to arrive
at the conclusion that natural resource scarcities, along with several other fac-
tors such as increased pollution, would lead to precipitous declines in the out-
put of modem economies, beginning early in the twenty-first century. And
pessimist studies continue to appear
1,8. Maths, An Essay on Pepulaton, London, 1798
2 Danela H. Meadows ea, Te Lint fo Grote A Report for the Cab of Rome's Project on the
Preise of Mankind, New York, Universe Book 1972
SA recent one is Mark Hlertgnard, Earth Odyssey, Around the World in Seirch of Our Emin
rental Future, Broadway, BOD, 109,4 SecTION ONE, wrROBUCTION
‘The pessimists can point to history to support their view. George Perkins
Marsh, in his influential historical study? of the relationships of humans to
their natural environments, begins with an allusion to the Roman Empire:
‘The Roman Empire, atthe period of its greatest expansion, comprised the regions of
the earth most distinguished by a happy combination of physical advantages,
‘The abundance of land and water adequately supplied every material want, minis-
tered liberally to every sensuous enjoyment. . .. If we compare the present physi
‘al conditions, . . . we shall find that more than half oftheir whole extent... is
tither deserted by civilized man and surrendered to hopeless desolation, or atleast
‘greatly reduced in both productiveness and population,
At the other end of the spectrum are the extreme optimists. Natural re-
source scarcities will surely occur in the future, they admit. But human beings
have the capacity to overcome this challenge, largely by finding substitutes
for resources that get scarce and by eventually bringing population growth,
under control.
‘The optimists can also call upon history to support their position. When
England began to experience severe wood shortages, along came coal technol-
‘ogy upon which to build the industrial revolution. When coal started becom-
ing scarce, petroleum technology was developed. When serious food scarcties
threatened the burgeoning populations of Asia, the green revolution was ini-
tiated to increase food production potential. When domestic energy prices in-
creased rapidly in the 1970s, American producers and consumers demon-
strated a surprising ability to adjust technologies and behaviors so as to
conserve energy. In other words, history provides many examples of technol-
ogy shifts and resource conservation in the face of increasing natural resource
shortages. This has led many people to be optimistic about our abilities to re-
spond, without catastrophic results, to natural resource scarcties of the future.
Of course this does not rule out the need for many local adjustments that will
be burdensome in the short run, especially to people whose livelihoods are
tied directly to supplies of the scarcer resources.
Perhaps it is fair to say that most of us lie somewhere between the extremes
on this issue: We are concerned, certainly, but there is a sense that this is not a
situation that we are incapable of ameliorating to a large extent if the right
steps are undertaken. This brings up a further question: How are we to know.
when real natural resource scarcity is about to put a seriouss crimp in economic:
welfare? To be able accurately to forecast when some essential natural re-
source will become seriously restricted in supply, we would need complicated
4 George Perkins Marsh, Man and Natur, 1864, Belknap Peess of Harvard University Press,
(Cambridge, MA, 1955, pp. 7-9.
5A good early example ofthe optimist school isthe epost put out by the Hudson Institute, a
think tank specializing in trying to discera future tends; see Herman Kahn, Willa Brown, and
‘Leon Martel, The Next 200 Yeu, Nuw York, William Morrow ane Company, 17% A mare recent
optimist work is Julian Simon, The Ultimate Resource 2, Princeton University Press, Prinecton, NI
1896,
|CHAPTER | (PORTANT ISSUES IN NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS 5
models incorporating predictions about population growth, the rate of techno-
logical change, the rate of new discoveries, and so on. It is very difficult to
‘build economic models that explicitly account for all these factors,
Long-Run Price Changes
But there is another way, Many natural resources are traded on organized
markets; most of these are international in scope with hundreds of partici-
pants on the demand and supply sides of the markets. All the different views
held by these participants regarding the present and future demands and sup-
plies of the resources in question ge! registered on one element of the market,
namely, the price af the resource. Resource prices, in other words, tend to dis-
till out the preponderant views about present and future resource scarcities.®
‘Thus the main focus of resource economists in-the-study_of natural resource
scarcities has been to examine the historical paths of the prices of these re-
sources. Rising prices would signal increasing scarcity, whereas steady or de-
lining prices would signal the absence of scarcity.
Actually, there does not seem to be any long-run tendency for natural re-
source prices—at least prices of the traditional resource-type commodities—to
increase. It is more generally true that prices have historically decreased, de-
spite the huge demographic growth that has taken place over the last few cen-
turies. Some prices have shown temporary rises, but the long-run trend has
been downward. The primary reason for this has been massive technological
change in extraction, transportation, and refining. Whether we can expect the
indefinite continuation of technological transformations to the degree we have
enjoyed in the recent past is a much debated issue.
Natural Resource Substitution
A key relationship within the long-run scarcity phenomenon goes under the
prosaic name of natural resource substitution. It is perhaps a human trait for
living generations to project thoughts of permanence onto situations that are,
especially in the long run, quite changeable. Familiarity with contemporary
technologies leads us to discount the idea that the situation could be very dif-
ferent. But over the long sweep of history, patterns of natural resource use
have changed dramatically, at least in the developed world. What history
shows is a series of large and small natural resource substitutions in response
to changing conditions of scarcity and price. There is every reason to believe
that substitutions in the future will work toward relieving future resource
shortages. One possible example is discussed in Exhibit 1-1. This is the substi-
tution of salt water for freshwater sources to provide for the needs of humans.
+ ocoue ter actos so tat pes we mut bce in ying to ently a cary
sig inal ie sonnet he rere at srs pos wll ay 9
any ervconneral cone ote exencion acer het wil beeen por
init yeustcome6 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION
EXHIBIT 1-1
DESALINATION: AN INCREASINGLY POPULAR OPTION
Areas with water shorlages, especialy in through a sereen that filers out both sus-
tigrincome counties, are fuming increas: pended and dcolved sols, Reverse os-
ingly to desainaton plants to supplement mone climbed lo about 31 percent cf tll
valor resources In tho 1960s, the rumber global capactyby 1860, up om 20 percent
ot plans producing mare an 00 cuble i 1904,
Imeters por day creased cramaticaly, om Deealination is sl tvee to four Yes
53627 plants n December 196 107.598 more expensive than converional sours
plans operating in 120 counties mn Docem of fesh water, costing 40-60 cents per
bor 1050. A hatte, global capacity (ol. 1,000 Its of brackish water and $1.05 1
thor installed oF contracted) was estimated §1.60 per 1,000 Iters of soa wator. As ha
a neary 13.3 milion cute meters per day, technology improves, however, and the
Tough Y24eld increase since 1970. coe of convencna freshwater inoreases,
esatnation pants ere now comman in desalination plants are tiely to become
areas that can afford the relatively nigh more popular and the costs are likely '0
ost such as Saud Arabia, Kuwall, and contin fo deaine shy. Tere ls greaty
South Fonda, Meesured by percentage of increased intrest, or exampe, In bull
{otal global capacity, Saud Arabia is the dilaton plans longa electc Wit
world leader with 27 percent; followed ad using the waste heat tom power gen
by the United States, 12 percant Kuwait, eralon to dive the desalination process.
1 percent and the United Arab Emvates, About 69 ereant of ll pans are teat
40 porcon ing sea wator and 27 percent are Weaing
titge plans, such asthe millon cubic breclsh water. Desalination plants ar i
motor por cay Jubal plant In Sauch Arabia, cresingly Bang Used for applications char
Usualy use the dilation proces, which fan removing salt, such a8 tho Weatment ot
Est waters heated and the resiltng seam effluent waters, of river water to obtain
Condenses int resh water The main dst. waler for bolers of groundwater that has
fation process—ine mullltage flash been polvied by nirates and pesticides,
process has decned from 67 percent ot and of municipal water to make ulrapure
{al eapacty in 198¢1o about $6 percent nwa for the elo aus
41969, butt sit plays a significant role in
verylage plants end'india-pupose plans, Sowes: From Word Resourses 1098-68,
Coupled with power generation. Smaller S22 the Gita Enannen! oy Wai
Plans tpicaly use reverse osmosis, wich Seyess tw, Ueed by pernesoh of er
Uses high pressure to force salt water Unrersy Press ine
‘The future will probably see a further drop in the costs of desalination, and as
this happens the shift to the oceans for our water supplies will have vast im- |
pacts, economically and politically, on current water supply systems.
Substitution occurs not only among resources, but also between natural re-
sources and other types of inputs. In fact resource conservation can be thought
of as a particular type of substitution. During the 1970s, high energy prices en-
couraged a great deal of substitution, in this case of capital-type inputs (-g.,
new energy-saving machines) for energy inputs, which produced a substantial
amount of energy conservation. A major role for natural resource economics is
to study the future potential for scarcity-mitigating resource substitutions,CCHAPTERL1: IMPORTANT ISSUES iW NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS 7
SOCIALLY OPTIMAL RATES OF RESOURCE USE
‘Asa way of coming to grips with the issue of whether society is using its natu-
ral resource assets wisely, looking, at long-run trends in resource prices may
seem rather indirect. A more satisfying approach might be to focus on the
rates at which particular resources are used and to try to answer the question
of whether these rates are the best ones from the standpoint of society. The
study of socially optimal natural resource utilization rates is a major part of
natural resource economics. “Optimal” means “best” according to some speci-
fied criteria. Optimal use rates depend on many factors, such as the value of
the resource in alternative uses, rates of natural replenishment, environmental
factors, expected demographic and technological trends, and so on. The chal-
lenge to those who would study these niatters is to use theories and models
that will capture the important complexities of the real world, but give results
that are comprehensible to the average person.”
Exhibit 1-2 illustrates some of the difficulties of trying to determine optimal
utilization rates, The problem here is setting annual catch rates for particular
fisheries. One concept that fisheries biologists and administrators have used is
maximum sustained yield, the maximum allowable catch that can be sus-
tained over many years. But fish stocks may fluctuate from year to year for a
variety of reasons. So an allowable catch that is reasonable in a year of relative
abundance may not be in years of scarcity. From an administrative political
standpoint it may not be possible to vary allowable catch rates annually: The
pressure will be to set the rates at the same level for a period of years. For a
fisheries administrator the problem is how to set long-term catch rates in a
fluctuating ecosystem.
‘Again, the relevant criterion for evaluating natural resource use rates is social
optimality. But society is composed of many people and groups, and what is
optimal for one may not be so for another. Ifa decision or course of action is so-
cially optimal, it presumably means that itis the best, taking into account all the
expected consequences and implications flowing from the decision or action, In
later chapters we will try to give substance to this somewhat abstract notion.
IDENTIFYING THE SOURCES OF NATURAL,
RESOURCE MISMANAGEMENT
‘A natural extension of identifying optimal natural resource use rates is the
issue of diagnosing the reasons why actual rates of use are often not optimal.
‘The job here is one of studying the causes of resource mismanagement. To
diagnose instances of mismanagement calls first for a specific criterion that
can be used to recognize cases of mismanagement. In economies the primary
criterion is efficiency; a second one of great importance is equity. A natural
7 In economics» “model” isa simplified way of depicting how sinporiant factors (eg, resource
‘se rates, technical ange, population growth) are interrelated and how chariges in One factor can
afect changes in others.8 SecrIONONE: INTRODUCTION
EXHIBIT 12
UNCERTAINTY, RESOURCE EXPLOITATION, AND CONSERVATION:
LESSONS FROM HISTORY
Donald Ludwig, Ray Hiborn, Cart Waters
For some years the concept of maximum destruction of resources. Many practices
{udainod vied (MSY) guided efforts st fs1- continue even in cases where there fs abun-
fries management. Thare is now wide- dant scientic evidence that they are ul-
‘Spread agroornont that tis concept was un- mately destructive. An outsiandng example
fortunate, Larkin concluded that fisheries the use of irgaton in arid fnds. Approx
‘ciontists have been unable to contre the mately 3000 years ogo in Sumer, the once
Technique, distibuton, and amount of fishing Righly productive wheat crop had to bo re-
foto. The consequence has bosn the elm placed by baray because barley was more
nation of some substocks, such as herring, _sallesistant. The say soll was the resut of
(od, ocaan porch, salmon, andlake rout Ho rigllon.E. W, Higard pointed out in 1898
‘Concluded that an MSY based upon the tha the consequences of planned iigation
lanalyis ofthe historic staistes ofa They in Calfonia would be sila Mis wamings
is nt atinabe on a sustained basis. Sup. wore not heeded. Thus 3000 yeas of oxpe-
pot for Lacks view Is provided by @ num- ance and @ good scientific understanding
bor of reviows ofthe Risto of fisheries Few of tho phenomena their causes, and the ap
{sheries exit steady abundance. propriate prophyactic measures are not Sut
Harvesting of ireguar or ficiuaing re- ficient to prevent the misuse end conse
souroos i subject toa ratchet ote: during quent destruction of resources.
felatively table porods. harvesting rates Poltcalloacers at levels ranging trom
tend to sablize at postions predicted by world summits to lal communities base
‘stoady state biosconomic theory. Such lev. Wel policies upon a risguided view of the
ts aro oflon excessive. Than a taquence of dynamics of resource exploitation, Sclen-
{0d years encourages additonal invest: sl have been activo in poining out env
fmont in vessels or processing capacity. ronmental degradation and consequent
‘When conditions return to normal or below hazards to human ie, and possibly to ite
‘oral he Industry appeals tothe gover- as we know it on Earth. But by and large
tment for help: oten suostantal Investments the scientific community has helped to per
land many obs are at etako. The govormmen_patuate the iusion of sustanable develop
fal response typical eect orindrect mont trough scientific and technological
Sides, These may bo thought of inal ae progress. Resource probiems are not relly
fomporary, but tol effect Is 10 encourage envrenmental problems: Thay are human
‘vernarvestng. Te falhet effects caused problems that we have created at many
by the lack of inition on Invstments dur- tines and in many places, under a varity
ing good portods, But sang pressure not to of pllical, socal, and economic systems.
dsinvestGurng poor periods. The longterm
‘outcome i a heavily subsidized inst that es
ae Sn: Rei wn pein om So
Solenile certain and consensus in Sarge Anorce Asean he os Bavaro
self woud not prevent everexpiotation nd merit Seance.
resource is being managed efficiently if it is producing the maximum net
value to society. "Producing" in this case means more than conventional ex-
tractive activities; it also includes values that resources produce when they
are not used in traditional ways, but rather are conserved for ecological pur-
poses or other nonextractive roles. A natural resource is being used equitably‘conowes 9
CHAPTER») PORTANT ISSUES IN NATURAL AESOURCE
if the distribution of the net benefits flowing from its use is regarded as fat
Economic analysis can identify situations that are efficient; judgments about
‘what is fair must come from the political system.
Tin a market economy, natural resource mismanagement can arise from two
‘major sources: (1) the difficulties private markets encounter, in some circum
stances, of functioning efficiently, and (2) misguided public policy and public
regulation,
“Exhibit 1-3 discusses three cases of misguicled policies in the United States.
They deal essentially with the way laws have been used to subsidize users of
natural resources on the public domain, In many cases this happens because
laws that were originally enacted for one purpose stay on the books even
though conditions change. So a mining law, for example, that may have been
reasonable when it was enacted in 1872, has become a means of subsidizing
ining operators because conditions in the industry are vastly different now,
‘hile the law remains unchanged. And because the subsidies create powerful
political constituencies, present-day legislatures are unable to change the
laws.
“Throughout the book we will encounter many cases like this, where public
resources policy enacted at one point in time, or in the pursuit of certain objec-
tives, has had effects that are inefficient and /or inequitable. Likewise, we will
encounter situations where private markets, left to themselves, will lead to
natural resources mismanagement. This obviously creates a dilemma. If pri-
vvate natural resource markets are functioning inefficiently, but effective public
policy is too hard to get, what do we fall back on? We obviously have to fall
back on making choices between imperfect alternatives—an idea we will deal
with throughout the book,
PRESERVATION VS, EXTRACTION: VALUATION.”
OF THE ALTERNATIVES
In their ancient, historical role, natural resources were thought to be merely
raw materials to be extracted or otherwise physically converted or used to
support economic growth and the advancement of material welfare. They
were regarded as inputs to fuel the economy and the production of the full
range of goods and services desired by consumers. They still play this role.
But in recent decades another role has become widely recognized and appreci-
ated: the value of natural resources in terms of the nonextractive services they
provide—scenic values, support for outdoor recreation, biodiversity preserva-
tion, and simply the preservation of a meaningful natural heritage!
‘The opposition between the motives of extraction and preservation has pro-
duced some monumental conflicts in this century. One of the first and best
known was the fight in the early years of the century over converting the
Hletch-Hetchy Valley within Yosemite National Park from a scenic natural
wonder to a massive dam and reservoir to supply water to San Francisco. A
similar fierce debate occurred in the 1960s and 1970s over the construction of a
dam in Glen Canyon, Utah, that changed a place of great natural beauty to a10 secTiow ONE: iwrRooUCTION
ExHiBIT 1-3
(One important factor leading to excessive
natural resource use can be public subst
sls that go to natural resource users a a
result of past resource policies. The follow
Ing is rom the Economie Report of the
President, 1997,
Curren policies toward natural resource
use are mainly rooted in past legisation in
tended to stimulate the economies of the
West and encourage settiement ofthe re-
ion. These policies facitate the develop
‘ment and exploitation of natural resources.
Subsidized Use of Federal Public
Lands. Most uses of Federal public land are
currently subsidized in one of a last three
possible ways. First, a subsidy can exist
‘when the price to the user is less than the
‘government’ cost of overseeing tho activ.
ity, Second, a subsidy may exist when
Users of Fedaral lands pay the government
‘8 pice below that pad for the similar use ot
comparable privatoly owned lands. Finally,
resource users may receive a subsidy if
they pay the government lose than the op-
portunity cost ofthe Lana's use, which i do-
fined as the value of the highest alternative
use ofthe resource. The fype and amount
of subsidy offered on Fedoral lands vary
withthe nature of the activity and with the
locaton of tha land
Public grazing foes are almost always
bbolow private foes and may not even cover
tho governmant's coat of administarng the
‘grazing program.
“The subsidy offered to ranchers Is smal,
however, compared with that given to min:
8 taking hardrock minerals such as gold
‘copper, sivar, and uranivm: miners do not
pay he government ay signicant revenue
(oF fee for hardrock minerals extracted from
PUBLIC SUBSIDIES AND NATURAL RESOURCE UTILIZATION
Federal public lands. This polley, estab-
lished in the 1872 General Mining Law, be-
stows @ large subsidy on private mining
companies,
Timber extraction from Faderat public
lands is also subsidized, athough the sub-
sidy is more subtle than those for mining
and grazing. Generally, tho USFS subet~
‘izos timber exracion trom pubke land by
collecting ess in tbor sale revenvee than
it spends on timber program costs,
Federal water projects constructed and
managed by the Beau of Reclamation, the
‘Aumy Corps of Engineers, and the Natural
Resource Concarvation Sevice ofthe U.S
Dopartmant of Agriculture area highly suD-
sidized, For example, projects constructed
by the Bureau of Reclamation embody 2
numberof cifernt subsidies, These include
interest tree repayment for capital invested
In inigaton facies, limitation on ropayrant
association with “abilly fo pay” quidein
that do not necessarily reflect changing eco-
omic or market condtons or nviuals
come, and the repayment of costs above an
Inigator’s estimated abiity 0 pay by using
hydropower revenues far inthe tatu,
Recreational use of Federal public lands
's also heavily subsidized: in many areas
fees paid by recreational users do not cover
the costs of maintaining the resource for
recreation. The Park Service sponds
around $250 milion annually to provide i=
{or services at its 974 parks, monuments,
land Fstorc sts. Entrance fees raise cay
860 milion annually
Source: Economic Report of th Presi,
Government Prining Ofice, Washington, D..
1907. 26-218
large flat-water recreation area. Conflicts continue today: the cutting of old:
growth forests vs. preserving endangered species; the drilling for oil in desig.
nated wilderness areas; the expansion of ski resorts vs. the preservation of for-
est habitat; the growth of off-road motor vehicles vs. the preservation of
natural peace and quiet, and so on.CHAPTER 1 IMPORTANT SSUES IN NATURAL
URGE ECONOMICS 11
In the extraction/ preservation debate there are a number of important tasks
for resource economists. One is to try to look deeply into the basic nature of
the choice that confronts society in these cases. Preserved resources are usu
ally unique; extracted resources usually are not. Extraction often results in ir
reversible changes of natural resource assets; preservation normally does not.
In light of these factors, normal principles of rational choice may suggest that
we adopt conservative decision strategies that will prolong our natural re-
source options. We will discuss this topic at greater length later in the book
Another important role for economics in these cases is in valuing the con-
sequences of the preservation option. Extracted resources are normally (not
always) sold in markets; think of petroleum, timber, agricultural land, and
commercial fish. The values that society places on these resources are regis-
tered in market prices for such products as oil, wood, and land. These are
often well-organized, competitive markets where prices reflect the give-and-
take between consumer desires and natural scarcities. The preservation op-
tion, on the other hand, usually does not involve the market. In many cases
this is a problem to be rectified, and one of our tasks will be to explore new
possibilities for market-based resource policies, But another critical task is to
develop and apply analytical tools to measure the value of nonmarket re-
sources, for example, resources such as ecosystem services, which do not
move through markets. Resource economics has developed some special tech-
niques for doing this, as we shall see
AA third important contribution that economics can make to this debate isin
assessing the economic consequences of shifting resources from extractive to
preservation uses, especially the consequences in terms of the distribution of
costs. Programs to reduce or change the extraction rates of particular re-
sources will usually have important impacts on the extractive industries
formed for this purpose. Proposals to reduce timber harvesting in a certain re-
gion, for example, will impact people in transport and mill operations in that
region, Plans to reduce fishery catch rates will require cutbacks in employ-
‘ment in the fishing fleet. Very often the costs of preservation programs are dis-
proportionately bone by relatively small groups of people. It is important for
economic analysts to identify this situation when it exists and to help provide
the data and analysis on which compensation might be devised
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND NATURAL RESOURCES.
How people use, and abuse, natural resources is not simply a technological
‘matter, but more importantly a result of the economic institutions? that guide
! This doesnot preclude that economists are advocates for one position or another, but that i
‘esentally apolitical role, nolan analytical one
*""Eegnomic institutions” refers broadly to the rules and organizations that govem economic
activity in any particular society. Such things as laws governing Property nights nd commercial
transactions, court systems, patent and copyright laws, and policy organizations like legislatures
and regulatory agencies are ll examples ol institutions32 secTION ONE: INTRODUCTION
our decisions and behavior. Especially important in this respect are property
rights institutions: the laws, customs, and regulations governing the rights of
people to have access to, and utilize, natural resources of different types. All
human societies have property rights institutions, though not necessarily the
same ones. How different property rights systems affect human uses of natu
ral resources is a major issue in natural resource economics.
One important topic is how different types of property rights—public or
private, individual or collective—affect the types of uses to which natural re~
Sources are put and the resulting rates of utilization. Another important prob-
Jem is how the physical features of different natural resources (eg, the fugi-
tive nature of wild fish or the regional variations in water abundance) affect
the property rights that are most appropriate to the resources. A third is how
new types of property rights might evolve to help resolve certain difficult nat-
ural resource problems.
Exhibit 1-{ discusses an example of the latter. It deals with the shift from an.
open-access system of fisheries management to one based on private property
EXHIBIT 1-4
RIGHTS-BASED FISHING: TRANSITION TO A NEW INDUSTRY
North Atlantic fisheries off New England and maritime Canada have collapsed, and
throughout the world viel from many ocean fiehing grounds are dockning preciitousy.
Reversing he process may require abandoning the tradtion of tree anid open access fo the
‘ocean's resources In exchange fora "losed-access” system based on property righ,
‘The stay Is certainly not nows: many of the seas. As a resuit of overtishing, 100 many
world's ocean Tisheries aro boing pushed fishermen and manutacturors now pursue
toward possibly ruinous declines. True, and process fewer and fewer—and gener.
we have yet to 880 skyrocketing prices of aly smalior—specimans.
long lines at the seafood counter. Long- Broad command-and-control regulatory
‘tablished fishing communi, however, approaches, typically based on some ver-
‘ar0 trreatoned, as are some traditonal, ofton sion of open access, cleary are not work
‘centuries-old ways of life. Sporadic armed ing. Management areas, fr instance, seem
Confct has even broken out In some tetito- tobe too large to reflect accurately the local
tial waters. And the equllitium of coastal conditions and interests of the fishermen
‘marine ecosystems, already taxed by polu- themselves. Even when control has been
tion and other development prassures, i fur- regionalized, asin the United States with its
ther threatened by progressive decimations nine rogionalfisherios management coun
‘of many marine species and populations, cls, the decsionmaking powors tand to re
Many Americans may be aware of the side in those wth vested interests in short
collapsed Nortn Atlantic fisheries off New term gains rather than the long-term health
Englana and martime Canada. The px0- of the fisheries. Qoean fisheries manage:
Jem, though, is global and growing, and we ment needs the cooperation of those who
know why overishing, The practice results work the seas, much of the preservation of
fom the traiton of [ree and open access torrestal biodiversity and ecosystom man.
to fishery resources that itself slems from agement require the willing assistance of
the tractonal principle af freedom of the private landownersCHAPTER 1. IMPORTANT ISSUES IN NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS
EXHIBIT 1-4—Continued
FIGHTS-BASED FISHING: TRANSITION TO A NEW INDUSTRY
Would creating and using propery rights
‘among fshermen work to conta beth open
‘access and overcapacity—and, thereby,
foverfshing? Systems could be designed 10
‘set quotas on catches permited o tthe
umber of icentes fssved. Such systems
have in tact been used around the globe
wth incressing frequency since the 1870s,
but most at iccal and regional levels. Such
righis-based fishing assumes that fshor-
men, i allowed exclusive use rights and
thus inoluded more directly in fisheries
management decisions, wil leary see the
benelits of managing for the long-term
heath and productivity of thir series.
Exclusive user rights have long been
used by small-scale local fishermen with
fishery resources adjacent to their own
‘community, especialy for relavaly sedon-
tary animals ike shellsh. Expanding this to
larger fsheries and mare motile sealife ro
‘mains a challenge (although tuna compa
hes In the Philipines have successtully
controled local access by limiting the type
Of fishing gear usec). The goal in al cases,
‘though, Is fo convey more authority for the
use of a fishery, including monitoring and
surveilance, to ts primary use
"New Zealand has become the leader in
1TQs (navidual ransterrable quotas), wth
thiny-two species-specific agreements
‘Asttali ea close secant division with
‘Japan of much ofthe scuthem biefin tuna,
fishery is ilustrative. Using relatively low
quota allocations, many In the Australian
Part of tho tshery had to decide whether to
buy more quota or sel out. Inthe two years
following the start ofthe ITO system for that
fishery, he number of boats in use dropped
by 50 porcent. Researchers estimated that
the capital so employed in the boats was
$10 to 512 milion less than under other
management schemes, The system aso for
‘cused catches on larger, more valuable
specimens, withthe vale ofthe catches in
‘croased thes: to fourals
Some Probleme
Unfortunately, byeatch—the inadvertent
capture of unscught species —is not neces:
seriy reduced substantially hough qu
{ould be sot for bycatch to encourage fish-
fermen to work other areas of the fishery
with loss bycatch potential or (in some ish
eres) to invest in equipment that would
minimize bycatch. Also, the introduction of
{8 propery-rghts regime does nat immed
atoy, or even necossarly,resut ina love!
Ing out of the rato of fishery stock deploton
‘And those fig that move between tho bio-
logically arbitrary 200-mile-wide toritoral
waters and the high seas present another
challange to property-rights regimes, much
as they do tothe present system,
Enforcement also remains a problem,
with the intrusions of foreign boats ang
fleets especially vexing. Poaching may
ways be with us, and assigning survilance
and monitoring to property owners seems
unlikely to change that Even more damag
ing and dificult 10 resolve can be legal ish-
ing at the very edges of the 200-mite limit,
Small-scale fishermen looking ever-tarthar
afield can so intrude, as can “pirat
trawlers using legal equipment such as
fine-meshed nets. Usually, however, the
legal Industial fleets of huge trawlers pres:
lent the greatest challenge. Designed 10
catch and process a ton oF more per ROU,
these giants can etfecivaly dean out much
of any fishery. Negotiating ard enforcing n-
temational agreamants may prolang the ull
‘transition toa rights-based industry.
Souce: Adapad tom Resouces fo he Fur
tre, Reaoureas, lve Yaa, Summer 1096
Feprinted y prison,14 section oNe: wrRODUCTION
rights. Ocean fisheries have historically been treated as an open-access re-
source: The fish are converted to the ownership of whoever gets there first and
puts the most effort into catching them. This has led repeatedly to overfishing.
and reduced fish stocks. The system of individual transferable quotas (ITQs)
is an attempt essentially to create marketable property rights in fish. If it
works, it could lead to reduced pressure on marine resources by taking advan-
tage of the normal incentives that owners have to preserve the values of their
assets, We will discuss this in detail in Chapter 19.
‘THE USE OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS IN NATURAL
RESOURCE DECISIONS
In 1966 the US. Congress enacted a law aimed at preserving endangered
species." It authorized the federal government to purchase land for the con-
servation of threatened species and the protection of their required habitats
“insofar as possible.” The language in which these statutes were written in ef-
fect allowed the relevant public agencies to make what they regarded as “bal-
anced” decisions on species protection, weighing the apparent benefits of cer-
tain preservation decisions with the costs of these decisions.
‘Then in 1973 Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This was
a time of great activity in federal environmental and resource policy. Advo-
cates of new laws and more encompassing public initiatives put great stress
on the benefits to be produced by these efforts, and paid relatively little atten-
tion to their costs. Thus, the language of the ESA was very different fom the
earlier laws; it essentially directed the agencies to protect endangered species
rno matter what the cost. Certain amendments of 1978 provided some flexibil-
ity by creating a mechanism whereby exemptions could be granted to the
strict requirements of the law. The terms of the original act still hold, however,
in that they do not permit the Secretary of Interior to take costs into account in
making decisions about endangered species. Once a species is listed as endan-
gered or threatened, itis supposed to be protected at al costs.
But although the political language appears to be unambiguous and un-
compromising, real life is more complicated. With goals in conflict, restrictions
fon budget resources, and imperfect knowledge, decisions simply cannot be
made without compromises and trade-offs. These can be made out of sight, as
it were, in the recesses of the bureaucratic process. Or they could be done
‘more overlly, by bringing benefit-cost analysis explicitly to bear. Benefit-cost
analysis is simply an attempt to account for and compare, within the same
analysis, all the benefits and costs of particular courses of action, It was devel-
oped many years ago to evaluate federal water projects like dams. In recent
years many people have taken the view that it ought to be applied more
broadly to all the natural resource and environmental decisions made in the
public sector. Needless to say, this is a controversial issue
"a Public Lar 89.669, signed on October 15, 1986CHAPTER 1. MPORTANT ISSUES IN NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS 15
Regarding the endangered species act, benefit-cost analysis would require
that economists estimate both the costs of taking action to preserve particular
species and the benefits of so doing. The costs are the values forgone if re-
sources are preserved for the support of an endangered species. The benefits
are the values that citizens place on having the species preserved, adjusted for
the probability that the species would survive anyway in the absence of the
specific preservation action under consideration. Exhibit 1-5 discusses some of
the benefit-cost analyses that resource economists have done on plans to pro-
tect the spotted owl.
In Chapter 8 we will examine the principles of benefit-cost analysis and
some of the techniques that economists have developed for applications in
‘cases of natural resource problems. Although the political controversy will no
EXHIBIT 15
‘THE ECONOMICS OF SPOTTED OWL PRESERVATION
pee eee ee
aloes eames Somenes arco ren mel
Rica easton cae rete eer cents
oan es Some eee
eceregen ee aes CO ee Sule
Leek feta ae ane
ce eee een aera
uaaots ome protic: faite, aise pam tht
Seeet Dante cemcon Saye eaaer mate eee
coated ei eee
Re cesrenrt eae teoaian ace mater’
Senha peer ee lamas memmees ees
scnataeatoce miata ur ecmera nenate eaiae
Senses serena eee cera
Cais eager nd tt tw Sanaa eee ea ae
eeseats eee eee
Sines en cen cares
erin
Woes cette ta te Re
yuee| wn ated eau a ery fu ee ses nce: at
forest hatitat; some of which, but not all is Groweh Fereste snd ine Spetiou Out: Contempo
[uted mcgewt frets Sonar, oes aaa gee16 SECTIONONE: INTRODUCTION
doubt continue on the appropriate role of benefit-cost analysis in public pro-
grams, the important approach from an analytical point is to keep working, on
making it better in terms of its applicability and the accuracy of the results it
produces.
LAND-USE ISSUES
In the ebb and flow of public concern about high-profile natural resource is-
sues—like endangered species, mining in national parks, and grazing fees on
the public range—it is sometimes easy to overlook one resource problem that
is faced virtually every day by communities everywhere: the use of the land.
Land is a resource in the sense that itis capable of producing distinctive goods
and services; it is also a resource because it is the spatial plane on which most
human activity takes place. Humans use portions of the earth’s surface for a
myriad of different uses: housing, work locations, roads and other transporta-
tion corridors, farms, parks, and wilderness areas. Land is also the critical sup-
porting medium for other biological resources of all types.
In most countries of the developed world, decisions on how particular pieces
of land will be devoted to particular uses are made through a complex mixture
of private land markets and public oversight, Land markets in the United States
are extremely well developed, with sophisticated surveying, deed registration,
title transfer practices, and courts to adjudicate disputes. But there is a long, his-
tory of public intervention in land issues, both to provide essential public ser-
vices like roads, to regulate the economic and technical impacts that adjoining or
propinquitous parcels of land have on one another, and to manage human im-
pacts on portions of the natural environment. In doing this, communities have
developed a large arsenal of regulatory tools, such as zoning, conservation re-
strictions, subdivision regulations, and outright land purchase.
The story in Exhibit 1-6 discusses a technique used by many states to try to
preserve agricultural land uses. In certain places, agricultural preservation is
important for cultural, scenic, and/or food supply reasons, and so efforts have
been made to look for ways of slowing the rate at which agricultural land is
converted to other uses, such as home lots. The approach is development
rights purchase, whereby public authorities purchase only the right to de-
velop from farmers, leaving them with the remaining rights on their land and
the freedom to farm the land as they wish. This allows some farmers to con-
tinue farming but also to realize a large share of the development value of
their lands. This clearly improves their financial positions, and the hope is that
it will enable them to continue operating the farms. This may be easier be.
cause of the tax advantages stemming from sale of the development rights.
It is not hard to see how economic analysis has an important rote to play in
cases like this. Local land markets are usually very finely tuned institutions;
they normally react quickly to new stimuli (e.g., rumors of a new office build-
ing going up in town), and they can be very hard to guide in particular direc:
tions because of the substantial incentives they give to participants. The effectsHAPTER 1
EXHIBIT 1-6
PRESERVING FARMLAND. COWS IN TRUST
PAWLET.VT.—In the southwestern comer
of tho stato of Vermont, where mountains
‘ge above farmland and the Mettonee River
is ful of tout, Tim and Dot Leach, the own:
fers cf Woodlawn Farm, nave decided 19 sell
the covelopment rights of their 360-acre
airy farm tothe Vermont Land Trust. was
rot an easy decion, In giving up thelr ight
to sell the land at its markat value, the
LLeachos have placed @ conservation ease-
ment on it, a legal agreement betwoon
{landowner and land rst that reatcts deve
‘opment of the property. They stil own the
Jana and their chien wit inher, But Ht
‘must be kept open and avaiable to farming
To compensate them, the Vermont
Housing and Conservation Board puts a
lump sum in the Leaches’ bank account
with cash from the stato matched by local
charties. It may be loss than hal what the
property is worth on the open markt
“The Leaches are part of a conservation
movement which started in Vermont in
41077 and has grown, over 20 years, Into
4,400 noa-prolit regional and local lane
‘rusts dotted through the 50 stales. AS a r0-
‘sul, over dm American acres have already
been preserved from encroaching subdli-
sions, shopping mals and other commercial
ovelopments. Vermont alone has saved
110,559 acres. The sh New England states
hhave most land trusts, more than a third of
the total: Massachusetts has 121, more
‘than vast Calfornia's 116. Accorcing to tho
Land Trust Allance, the umbretla organi
tion for these groups, new trusts are ap-
Pearing ata rato of ono a woek
Iwas uncertainty about the futur that
‘made the Leaches decide to put Woodlawn
Farm in must. The four Leach eniven are
the seventh generation to ve an the farm
since the early 1800s. For the past 90 years
‘Woodtavin has been a dairy farm, an en-
angered species in America’s nort-east
‘Mr. Leach has butt up the herd and added
{an automated miking perfour, ho now runs
fone of the highest-yleloing mix operations
IMPORTANT ISSUES Iv NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS
7
In the state, Yet the volatity of mik prices
hhas been a constant worry. “You can 90
from doing well ta doing peony.” says Wr
Leach. "You don't know what wil happen
Mr. Leach was suspicious when the
Metiowee Valey Conservation Project, an
farm of the Vermont Land Twst, moved 10
the valley ten years ago. "The idea ofa land
trust fs not traditional. My stubborn Yankee
Consorvative nature rojected the idea for
years," he says. From the project's point of
View, Woodlawn Farm was exactly what it
was looking for: a solid, well-managed
working farm wih a history. As a bonus, the
Leashes also allowed access to hunters,
fishermen and snowmobilers, Public access
is not a requirement for Vermont iand-tust
farm, bu thes.
Joan Allen, the project director of the
Metiowee Valley land tus, says that con
peltion to take part in tho land trust pro-
‘gramme Is fierce, 1 takes a while to apply
‘and even longer to be appraised by the
local agency and state offices. Inthe final
stage, farm-ovners have lo appear before
the Vermont Housing and Conservation
Beard in Montpelier, the state capital 0 an-
‘wer questions, Mere than 100 farms, most
ff them dairy ones, apply in Vermont each
year, This year, 37 farms reached the final
Stage; there was money for only 11.
Not everyone agrees that soling devel-
lopment rights to a land trust is the wisest
choice for the landowner. The conservation
easement, the legal 100! that makes the
al work, is meant to be permanent. Al-
though the children can inherit, they lose
their rights 10 develop the land, even down
to such details as adding a soptic tank. This
‘means that the value of the property is a
minished. Yet the alternative, in most
cases, is stark: they would be able to stay
in toring
Cis also say the land tust movernent
is list. benefits the upper and upper
‘middle ciasses, the argument goes, by the
(continued)18 SECTIONONE INTRODUCTION
EXHIBIT 1-6—Contioued
PRESERVING FARMLAND. COWS IN TUST
strict standards imposes to protect the March 28rd, he concluded that in mary
land: growth contro open space, main: cisos taming disappears anyay and what
tained ecossystoms and the preservation lprterad is soon open space i cl
‘of town or village character. With land- a eutual sit toward the passive consump
‘rustonitored farms in th noighbourhood, ton of nature The Leachos, and many xo
houses and land prices may’ 90 uP aking them, vllhope lis not as passive asa a.
them outa he miido-case market
Robert Rak, a professor at Hamphico
Gallege In Amherst Massachusot, has g,S°WC, The Keane ay 17, 1007, ©
Sliced landrust consrvaton in th norte: febintsd war meme MEEEPS! tou, ne
‘east In a letter to the Now York Times on prone.
of development right purchases may be to protect land from development, but
not nécessarily to ensure that farming continues actively to be preserved. We
will look at some of the major dimensions of land economics in Chapter 14.
NATURAL RESOURCE ACCOUNTING.
In 1997 the gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States was $8,111 bil-
lion. This figure is an estimate of the total value of “final” goods and services
produced in the economy, that is, goods and services supplied to households
and other consumers. Among the countries of the world, increases in GDP are
normally associated with growth and progress. They support growing popu-
lations and make it possible to enjoy increases in per capita wealth and human
welfare
But conventional GDP measures are deficient in a number of respects. One
important problem is that they measure only the value of goods and services
that move through markets. So, for example, the value of volunteer work done
in the country is not included, nor is the value of work done in the household
by members of those households. Another problem is that they do not allow
for natural resource depletion. Adjustments are normally made for the depre-
ciation of human-produced capital goods—buildings, equipment, and the
like—which, in the normal functioning of an economy, will be used up to
some extent. Deducting capital from gross economic output leads to a meas-
ure of net output
But depreciation may also occur in a society's natural resource capital. The
production of conventional goods and services requires inputs from the mtu
ral environment, both in traditional forms, such as minerals, timber, water,
and agricultural land, and also in the less widely recognized nontraditional
services such as biological diversity, carbon fixation, and nutrient recycling.
Natural resources supply important scenic resources basic to the large outdoor
recreation industry, The resource base from which these goods and services
are supplied can clearly be depreciated as a result of their use. Quantitatively,CHAPTER 1; MIPORTANT ISSUES IN NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS 19
resources such as minerals used today reduce the stock available for future
generations. Qualitatively, ecosystems may be impacted so much that they
lose productivity, as in the case, for example, of soil erosion,
‘This has led some people to think about what is called natural resource ac-
counting. This focus involves two types of work: The first is to estimate the
value of ecosystem services provided by a country’s natural resource endow-
‘ment, so that they could be included along with standard output measures in
the national economic accounts. {An example of this is the measurement of flood
control values produced by many forested areas or the wildlife preservation val-
ues produced by public parks or other wildlife refuge areas. As mentioned
above, resource economists have worked to cevelop ways of accounting for
these nonmarket service flows. The other part of the natural resource accounting
effort is to assess the total value of the natural capital stock, so that we can deter~
mine the extent to which that stock is being depleted. Estimating natural re-
source accounts is an important task of ecological economics, a new specialty
within economics, in which researchers try to combine the principles of econom-
ics and ecology to produce a more powerful way of looking at the role of natural
resources and the impacts of economic activity on natural resource systems.
INTERNATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCE CONFLICTS
Natural resources historically have been the source of much conflict among
countries of the world. As nations pursue their economic growth and develop-
ment goals, these conflicts are likely to become more frequent and severe.
Water resources have been a major issue, as Exhibit 1-7 discusses. Fights over
surface water have led countries to the brink of war. Conflicts over access to
productive fisheries have continued to flare up, though some of the basis for
these has been removed with the 200-mile exclusionary zones now claimed by
‘most countries. Differences over rights to mine deep sea minerals may become
more common as undersea mining technology continues to improve. Conflicts
over access to undersea petroleum deposits continue in some parts of the
world. Understanding the genesis of, and possible solutions to, international
conflicts clearly calls for an understanding of how international law and inter-
national political institutions function, or often don’t function. Bilateral
treaties are often the result when a resource is shared between just two coun-
tries (eg, the Pacific Salmon dispute between Canada and the United States).
Multilateral agreements are required when multiple countries are involved
{e4, the regional seas treaties sponsored by the United Nations).
Economies-comes into the question when we want to understand the magni-
tude of natural resource values that are affected, in total and for the individual
countiés involved in disputes, and how these relative values might shift ac-
cording to different patterns of agreement. Economic efficiency.is involved, be-
cause it is important to be able to establish how a resource might be used so as
to maximize its net social value. How the total gets divided is also extremely
important, because fairness becomes an even more critical factor when itis the
Tepresentatives of sovereign states who are doing the negotiating.20. SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION
exHBIT 1.7
Kenneth D. Frederick
From Canada to Mexico, from Aca tothe
Middle East, ror Asia to Europe, confess
land the potential for contcts ace growing
‘over the availabilty of wator. White sharing
water resources has lang been divisive,
todays rising environmental, social, and f-
hancial costs of managing Earth's most
abundant and renewable natural resource
‘exacerbate these perennial tensions. Easing
‘such tensions becomes imperative ata tno
when demands for water are rising. The
‘reaterefcencies achievable by intagrated
resource management, developing water
‘markets, and price incentives may prove the
Dost ways io achiove this end,
‘Several factors undere virually all inter-
national conflicts over water and pose prob:
lems for managing and allocating it off-
ciently and equitably. These include the
variability and uncertainty of supplies, the
Interdependencies among users, and the
increasing scarcity and rising costs of fresh-
water. Because water Is a “fugitive
‘Source —naturally lowing trom one lecatlon
land one slate (qui, gas, oF solid) to an-
fther—individuals and counties have In-
Ccontvas to capture and use the resource
before it moves beyond their contrl but It
ti, itary, incentive o conserve and protect
supplies for downstream users.
Rivers and lakes that border multiple
counties, vers that flow trom one country to
another, and aquifers that underlie more
than one country are intemational resources:
the use of the resource by one courity at-
fecis the quantity or qualty ofthe resource
available fo another county. Such situations
‘re numerous: about 200 river basine are
shatod by two or moro counts. Thirteen
are shared by five oF more countries, and
four basins—the Congo, Danube, Nie, and
\Niger—are shared by nine or more coun:
‘nes. Shared watersheds comprise about 47
pporcent ofthe global land area and moro
{han 60 percent a he area onthe continants
of Altea, Asia, and South Amarca
WATER AS A SOURCE OF INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
‘The competion for water in tho Micle
East s 60 Intense that lasting peace in the
rogion is unlikely in the absence of an
agreement over shared water use.
Outstanding issues and potential sources
of confit include the allocation and co
tol of the Jordan River, tho use of the
aquifers underlying the West Bank, and
Jordanian objections to the construction
and operation of Syrian dams on the
Yarmuk, the major tibutary of the Jordan
ver, Water has already been the source
of armed contlict In the rogion betwoon
Syria and Israel, ance in the 19508 and
‘again inthe 1960
‘When the Incian subcontinent was part-
tioned between India and Pakistan in 1947,
longstanding conflicts over the Indus Fiver
‘became overnight an international issue be-
‘ween twa hostia countries. The partionng