Scribd
Upload
96 views3 pages

Edward Bowie v. Henderson Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

Edward Bowie filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Henderson Police Department which was denied by the district court. Bowie appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the records. The Fourth Circuit concluded that Bowie's contentions were adequately addressed in the materials presented and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
96 views3 pages

Edward Bowie v. Henderson Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

Edward Bowie filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Henderson Police Department which was denied by the district court. Bowie appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the records. The Fourth Circuit concluded that Bowie's contentions were adequately addressed in the materials presented and that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2448

EDWARD BOWIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 13-1131

EDWARD BOWIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00514-FL)

Submitted:

May 23, 2013

Decided:

May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and


Circuit Judge.

AGEE,

Circuit

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se.


Kari Russwurm Johnson,
CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
In
the

these

district

consolidated

courts

orders

1983 (2006) complaint.


no reversible error.

appeals,

denying

Edward

relief

on

Bowie
his

appeals

42

U.S.C.

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

Bowie v. Henderson Police Dept,

No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013).


dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like