Scribd
Upload
62 views2 pages

Jones v. US Parole Comm, 4th Cir. (2000)

John Edward Jones filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging a decision of the United States Parole Commission. The district court denied relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the decision to deny Jones' petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
62 views2 pages

Jones v. US Parole Comm, 4th Cir. (2000)

John Edward Jones filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging a decision of the United States Parole Commission. The district court denied relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the decision to deny Jones' petition. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6132

JOHN EDWARD JONES,


Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-730)

Submitted:

September 29, 2000

Decided:

October 12, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


John Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
John Edward Jones appeals the district courts order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

We have reviewed

the record and the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Jones v. United States Parole Commn, No. CA-98-730 (E.D.N.C. Dec.
1, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like