United States v. Steven Carr, 4th Cir. (2013)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Steven Carr, 4th Cir. (2013)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsUNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN DONEWAN CARR, a/k/a Steven D. Carr,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2)
Submitted:
February 21, 2013
Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
February 26, 2013
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Donewan Carr, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district courts order
denying his motion for reconsideration of its order granting his
18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. *
Because the district court lacked the authority to reconsider
its
disposition
States v.
affirm
Goodwyn,
the
States v.
2012).
legal
of
Carrs
596
district
Carr,
F.3d
courts
No.
3582(c)(2)
233,
23536
denial
of
5:98cr00246RLV2
motion,
(4th
see
Cir.
relief.
United
2010),
See
(W.D.N.C.
we
United
Dec.
14,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Although the district court granted Carrs 3582(c)(2)
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Carrs
sentence to the full extent he requested.
