International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology
Volume No.5 Issue No.5, pp: 256-258
ISSN:2277-1581
01 May 2016
Non-Linear Equation by using False Position Method
Mrs. Tasleem Sultana1, Dr.Joythi Shinday2
1
Royal Institute of Technology and Science
2
Al- Habeeb College of Engineering & Technology, Chevella.
Abstract : In this paper we making a bookshelf to carry
books. the material is wood having a young's modulus to find
the maximum vertical deflection of the bookshelf. we can
directly use this false position method because it converge the
root values quickly when compared to bisection method.The
advantage of the bisection method is its reliability but the
disadvantage of the bisection method is it takes number of
iterations to bisect to the optimum value as the interval to
bisect will decrease so it takes more amount of time to get
optimum value.
1.INTRODUCTION
Outline: The false position method is one of the numerical
analysis method which is used to find the root of a non- linear
equation the root of the equation is a point where the curve cuts
X-axis when y=0 (1)
Method: The converges process in the bisection method is
very slow. IT depends only on the choice of end points of the
interval (a, b). The function f(x) does not have any role in
finding the point c. Which is just the midpoint of a and b
It is used only to decide the next smaller interval (a, c)or (c
,b) (2)
A better approximation to c can be obtained by taking the
straight line joining the points (a, f(a)) and (b, f(b)) intersecting
the X- axis to obtain the value of c we can equate the two
expressions of the slope m of the line.
x=
af b bf (a)
f b f(a)
The equation that gives the position x where the deflection is
maximum is given by
0.67665 108 x 4 0.26689 105 x 3 + 0.12748
10 x 0.018507=0
3 2
find the position x where the deflection is maximum conduct
3 iterations to estimate the root of the above equation find the
absolute relative approximate error at the end of each iteration
and the number of significant digits at least correct at the end of
each iteration
Solution by Bisection Method :
0.67665 108 x 4 0.26689 105 x 3 + 0.12748
10 x 0.018507=0
3 2
0.0000000067665 x 4 0.0000026689 x 3 +0.00012748 x 2 0.018507=0
(3)
now the next smaller interval which brackets the root can be
obtained by checking f(x)<0 or f(b)>0 selecting c by the above
expression is called regular falsi method or false position
method .
f(0) =-0.018507<0
f(29) = 0.018826>0
Formula :
Result : Bi-Section Method V/s False position method .
Question: you are making a bookshelf to carry books that
1
range from 8 "to 11" in height and would take up 29" of space
2
along the length. the material is wood having a Young's
3
Modulus of 3.667Msi, thickness of " and width of 12" you
8
want to find the maximum vertical deflection of the bookshelf
the vertical deflection of the self is given by
v x = 0.42493 104 x 3 0.13533 108 x 5 0.66722
106 x 4 0.018507x
where x is the position along the length of the beam hence to
dv
find the maximum deflection we need to find where f x = =
dx
0 and conduct the second derivative test.
IJSET@2016
x=
Ea =
1.
a+b
2
x new x old
100
x new
TABULAR:
S.
no
F(x)
29
14.5
0.000139
9<0
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s5/508
------------
Page 256
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology
Volume No.5 Issue No.5, pp: 256-258
2
3
14.5
14.5
29
21.75
21.75
0.012824
>0
33.33
18.12
5
0.00675>
0
20
ISSN:2277-1581
01 May 2016
0.5 102m
0.199
dividing the above equation by 0.5
0.398 102m
14.5
18.12
5
16.31
3
0.003352
>0
11.11
14.5
16.31
3
15.40
7
0.001612
>0
5.880
4
14.5
15.40
7
14.95
4
0.000719
2>0
3.029
3
log 0.398 2 m
m 2 log(0.398)
m = 2.40012 approximate
therefore m=2
The number of significant digits at least correct in the
estimated
14.5
14.95
4
14.72
7
0.000298
53>0
1.541
4
14.5
14.72
7
14.61
4
0.000080
25>0
0.773
14.5
14.61
4
14.55
7
0.392
0.67665 108 x 4 0.26689 105 x 3 + 0.12748
103 x 2 0.018507=0
14.5
57
14.61
4
14.58
6
0.000029
84<0
0.000026
17>0
0.199
0.0000000067665 x 4 0.0000026689 x 3 +0.00012748 x 2 0.018507=0
14.5
57
14.58
6
14.57
2
0.096
1
14.5
72
14.58
6
14.57
9
0.000000
873<0
0.000012
65>0
10
11
12
root is 14.586 is 2
Solution by False Position method:
f(0) =-0.018507<0
f(29) = 0.018826>0
Formula :
0.048
0
x=
By the 12th iteration Ea = 0.0480
Ea =
Ea 0.5 102m
0.0480
dividing the above equation by 0.5
0.096 10
0.5 102m
x1 =
2m
x2 =
0.5 102m
Ea 0.5 102m
IJSET@2016
=14.376
and
f b >0
and
14.376f 29 29f(14.376)
f 29 f(14.376 )
b = 29
=14.665
f(x2 ) = f 14.665 = 0.0001788 > 0
0.1922 102m
By the 10th iteration Ea = 0.199
f 29 f(0)
a = x1 = 14.376
By the 11th iteration Ea = 0.0961
m = 2.716 approximate
0f 29 29f(0)
therefore
m = 3.02 approximate
m 2 log(0.1922)
b=29
Since f(x1 ) < 0
m 2 log(0.096)
log 0.1922 2 m
x new x old
100
x new
f(x1 ) = f 14.376 = 0.0003793 < 0
log 0.096 2 m
Ea 0.5 102m
0.0961
dividing the above equation by 0.5
Here a=0
af b bf(a)
f b f(a)
Ea =
x new x old
100
x new
14.665 14.376
100
14.665
=1.97%
Since f(x2 ) > 0 and
f a <0
therefore
a=14.376
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s5/508
and
b=x2 = 14.665
Page 257
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology
Volume No.5 Issue No.5, pp: 256-258
x3 =
14.376f 14.665 14.665f(14.376)
f 14.665 f(14.376)
CONCLUSION:
=14.572
false position method usually converges more rapidly than
Bisection method.
f(x3 ) = f 14.572 = 0.00000087 < 0
Ea =
x new x old
100
x new
x old = 14.665
=
ISSN:2277-1581
01 May 2016
and x new = 14.572
14.572 14.665
100
14.572
=0.638%
Since f(x3 ) < 0 and
f b >0
therefore
a=x3 =14.572
x4 =
and
14.572f 14.665 14.665f(14.572)
f 14.665 f(14.572)
b= 14.665
=14.572
f(x4 ) = f 14.572 = 0.00000087 < 0
REFERENCES
The above date Tabular form
After the 3
constant
rd
iteration the value of x is not changing it is
At the end of the 3rd iteration Ea = 0.638%
Hence the number of significant digits at least correct is
given by largest value of m for
i. Mathematical Methods by Erwin Kreyszig (2.4) page no
113 edition 2014
ii. Mathematical Methods by T.K.V Iyengar
(3.6) page no
127 edition 2014
iii. Mathematical Methods by Shankaraiah
iv. Bisection method of solving a Non linear equation more
examples chapter 03.03 (Civil Engineering )
which
Ea 0.5 102m
0.638
dividing the above equation by 0.5
0.5 102m
1.276 102m
log 1.276 2 m
m 2 log(1.276)
m = 1.894 approximate
therefore m=2
The number of significant digits at least correct in the
estimated
root is 14.572 is 2
IJSET@2016
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s5/508
Page 258
