Loading Unloading Working1
Loading Unloading Working1
Material handling can be defined as: art and science of conveying, elevating,
positioning, transporting, packaging and storing of materials Starting from the time, the
raw material (such as fibres for spinning unit or yarns for weaving/ knitting unit and
fabrics for processing or garmenting units) enters the mill gate and goes out of the mill
gate in the form of finished products; it is handled at all stages within mill boundaries
such as within and between raw material stores, various section of production
department, machine to machine and finished product stores. A material may be
handled even 50 times or more before it changes to finished product. It has been
estimated that average material handling cost is roughly 10-30% of the total
production cost depending upon product to process. By saving in the material handling
cost, the cost of production can be reduced considerably.
Material handling involves the movement of materials, manually or mechanically in
batches or one item at a time within the plant. The movement may be horizontal,
vertical or the combination of these two.
Material movement adds to the cost but not to the product value. The ideal mill would
have an absolute minimum of materials handling and more use of mechanical material
handling equipments. The shortage of labour and increasing wages cost demand the
most efficient use of labour. Proper material handling offers benefits for:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
xi.
improving productivity
increasing the handling capacity
reducing man-power
increasing the speed of material movement
reducing materials wastage
promoting easier and cleaner handling
eliminating idle time of machines, equipment and workers
reduce fatigue incurred by the workers
increasing safety and minimising accidents
locate and stock material better and in less space
minimising production cost, etc.
i.
ii.
iii.
In order to speed up the material movements, employ mechanical aids in place of manual
labour.
iv.
For moving optimum number of pieces in one unit; use the principles of containerization,
unit load or palletization.
v.
Appropriate, standard, efficient, effective, flexible, safe and proper sized material
handling equipments should be selected.
vi.
vii.
viii.
To reduce damage to the materials during handling and economize material handling
process; design trolleys, packages, containers and drums etc.
ix.
Handling equipments are so arranged that these should minimize distances moved by
products and at the same time handling equipments should not interfere with other
machine or operation.
x.
Engineering aspect
Engineering factors include: the condition of existing building and plant layout, production
processes and equipments, nature of materials and products to be handled, usefulness and
effectiveness of existing material handling equipment.
Economic aspect.
The economic factors include the cost of material handling equipment, operating costs, repair and
maintenance costs and taxes etc.
The choice of particular equipment depends upon specific requirements or the condition of an
industry. For selection of Material handling equipment, the following factors should be taken into
account:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
Type of material flow pattern: A horizontal flow pattern will need trucks, overheads
bridge cranes, conveyors etc, whereas a vertical flow pattern will require elevators,
conveyors, pipes etc.
Types of production: The selection of the material handling equipment depends a great
extent on type of production such as: mass production and batch production. Conveyors
are more suitable for mass production on fixed routes and powered trucks for batch
production.
Other factors: Some other factors also considered during selection of material handling
cost are: cost of material handling equipment, handling costs, life of the equipment and
amount of care and maintenance required for the equipment.
In the textile mills, there are many types of materials viz. raw materials, purchased components,
material in process, finished goods, packing material, maintenance and repair supplies, scrape and
waste etc. These materials are of various size, shape and specific features. For this purpose, mostly
special and some general type material handling equipments are used in textile industries.
A. Material handling in spinning units
Types of material handling equipments used in the spinning mills are as under [Table 1]:
S.
No
.
1
2
3
4
5
Process
From supplier to
mill
From truck to store
Raw material store
to mixing section
Mixing to blow
room line
10
11
Winding to packing
6
7
8
9
i.
Material
Cotton/polyeste
r in bale form
Bale of raw
material
Bale
Loose cotton
Laps or loose
cotton
Sliver cans
Sliver cans
Roving bobbins
Ring bobbins
Ring bobbins
Cones
Material handling
Equipment
Truck or train or ship
Manual 2, 3 or 4 wheeled
truck
Manual 2, 3 or 4 wheeled
truck
Special designed trolleys or
lattice or suction
Specially designed trolley or
Air pipe conveyor and chute
Manual trolley or cans fitted
castrol wheels
Manual trolley or cans fitted
castrol wheels
Manual trolley/Tapa or special
designed trolley
Doffing trolleys
Specially designed plastic
trolley
Big size plastic trolley or
special designed trolley
In the most of the textile spinning mills, raw material i. e. cotton or polyester or viscose in the forms
of bale and other supplies are carried to mills by means of motor trucks. After arrival of trucks,
cotton or manmade fibres bales are manually pushed down on the floor.
These bales are transported with the help of 2, 3 or 4-wheeled industrial trucks/trolleys for storing in
godown one by one. This consumes time, requires more workers.
Sometimes Forklifts (Figures 3) can be used to unload bales (2 or 3 at a time) directly from trucks,
transport and stack them in godowns.
ii.
From godowns, bales are manually transported to the mixing department using single bale trolley. 2,
3 or 4-wheeled industrial trucks/trolleys manual or powered are utilised for handling the bales of raw
material such as bales of cotton/polyester/viscose etc. Some times, mills can use platform trucks, by
which a single operator can transport up to 3 bales at a time and deliver them at the appropriate place
in the mixing department. If mixing department is situated at an elevated place, forklifts can be used.
Conclusion
Although in the market a large variety of material handling equipment available in which some are
very conventional and some are modern. Modern material handling equipments are economical,
safer and can handle more material in unit time than conventional equipments.
The material handling departments basically perform two functions: eliminate the need of material
handling as for as possible by choosing appropriate production machinery, and choose most
appropriate material handling equipment which is safe, efficient and economical.
The selection of material handling mainly depends upon: Type of material to be handled, mill
building, layout, speed & type of production (mass production or batch production) and material
flow pattern.
There are two most important factors for analyzing or solving a material handling problem:
engineering factors, and economicfactors.
Challenges
The biggest challenge on todays warehouse managers is to increase productivity and accuracy,
reduce cost and inventory while improving customer satisfaction, which ultimately means, optimized
goods rotation, less frozen capital and efficient use of all the resources assigned.
In an integrated supply chain environment, where often enough warehousing is considered as a nonvalue adding activity, applying Lean can ensure the company has the right visibility of the valueadding activities carried out at the warehouse in order to gain a competitive edge by:
Delivering low-cost and on-time service to distribution centers, productive facilities and/or
points of consumption through improving efficiency and productivity while reducing costs,
and improving quality and accuracy in preparation of orders.
Improving stock control to prevent production or service disruptions due to lack of material,
picking disruptions due to lack of replenishment, loss of sales opportunities, and unnecessary
purchases.
Improving the information flow, traceability and service rates between the warehouse and the
rest of the cogs in the supply chain.
Managing the constantly increasing complexity of the market by improving flexibility and
showing high change-adaptability to meet the customers' fluctuating demands due to
seasonalities, rise of new sales channels, etc.
Focus Areas
Waste in warehousing processes represents tremendous savings potentials and thus it should and can,
using the right Lean tools, be identified and minimized. While in most warehouse operations picking
activities generate more than 55% of the costs, Lean principles, kaizen methods, and reengineering
approaches can be applied in every step of warehouse operations. The right Lean Solutions can
improve product quality, reduce lead-time and reduce working capital.
Transportation / Conveyance: Unnecessary internal transport that results in added cost and
lower productivity such as storing fast moving inventory in the back of the warehouse.
Inventory: Any activity that results in excess or lack of inventory or placed in a different
location where required. Poor visibility or inaccurate information over the existing inventory
in the warehouse management systems will impact the preparation of orders and ultimately
result in stock being unavailable for sales or shipping, thus increasing the frozen assets in the
company.
6
Lean Solutions
Designing and implementing Lean warehouse operations can have a great impact on the total supply
chain output. By approaching the waste focus areas mentioned above with Lean solutions, some of
the opportunities that come up to reduce lead times in warehousing include:
Handling time reduction in order picking, put away, palletizing and shipping.
Reliability of information to coordinate the rest of the supply chain.
Reduction in truck and containers loading and unloading times.
Reduction in time spent checking and looking for inventory.
Increased flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions and customer specifications.
Pull:
Takt:
Process transparency
Balanced distribution of the workload across resources
Process flexibility
Ability to plan resource capacity and/or improve forecasting
Optimal efficiency in resource utilization
Zero Defects:
4. Set rules for carrier pickup/delivery times and communicate to carriers. These should include
necessary what if scenarios, who to call, and how early/late arrivals will be handled.
Typically early routes will need to wait before they can approach the dock, and late routes
will need to be rescheduled with no demurrage penalty incurred at the dock.
8
5. Begin planning inbound or outbound loads within those constraints and communicate it to
carriers. Slot incoming/outgoing shipments into the 60 minute time slots on the dock
schedule. Communicate those pickup/delivery times with carriers.
a time two
trucks can be parked at a dock (From weigh dock to off loading dock, average
time : 8 minutes )
In this whole procedure certain documentation work is carried out and weighing dock personnel
systematically handle the receipts of weights among other things.
10
When container arrives at discharge / off loading dock, the ITN (Internal Transaction Number) copy
is collected from the driver and details are verified against the system from document number.
Warehouse personnel physically supervise the offloading procedure and record any damages.
The input of the general information about the truck takes about 2 to 3 minutes to enter.
Each arrival also requires 5 to 7 minutes of administration time either to communicate
information or to deal with any specic problems.
The truck unloading time which depends upon the volume and size of container; for e.g.,
1:10:00
A very important point of concern here is that only 6 40 feet trailers are unloaded daily
means average dock is used 7 hours time for unloading in a day. Means dock idle time is
approximately 5 hours which is a significant idle time and it must be curtailed through
efficient operational handling. We are considering working time of 12 hours.
Also in case of off loading the container, when the container is waiting to be off loaded so
that it leaves the primeses in 15 minutes.
Sub Tasks
Waiting at gate
From Plant gate to Weigh Dock
Input of General Information
Administration Time
Weigh dock to unload dock
Unloading Time 40 ft
Variable
s
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X6
X1
1
X1
2
X1
3
X1
4
10
mins
1 min
7 mins
3 mins
1 min
Scenario 1 - Refurbish
After Complete Unloading
Some Idle time for Empty Container
Vehicle checking and order processing (Time in start loading)
Warehouse To Dock
Dock to Container
12
Y
1
Y
2
Y
3
Y
08
mins
08
mins
3 mins
1 min
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
Y
8
Y
9
1 min
8 mins
65
mins
20
mins
15min
s
the plant
20 mins
10 mins
15 mins
13
then checking and verification at the entrance gate also takes some time, the time analysis from
parking to gate and then finally to dock is given as follows.
Variable
s
Z1
Z2
Z3
Z4
Z5
Z6
Now things to note here is that when a loaded container arrives at plant then it took a lot of
time to arrive at dock due to a number of sub tasks involved in the process. It is noticed that
this idle time is quite long and hence by improving this inefficiency there is a potential to
increase number of off loading activity carried out per day.
On an average the idle time from parking area to entrance gate is around three hours.
(Average: 210 Minutes)
After arriving at entrance gate the security staff carried out certain verifications and checking
of the vehicle like document verification, vehicle assessment and also jot down the necessary
information in the register maintained by the security staff. This whole process took around
on an average 12 minutes, after that the vehicle is allowed to enter into plant premises.
After entering the premises the vehicle is required to be weighed out by the weigh bridge,
some personnel at the premises directs vehicle to park at the weigh bridge. It took around 5
minutes to get the vehicle parked at the weigh bridge.
After parking the vehicle at weigh bridge the driver steps out and the weight of the vehicle is
carried out by the weigh bridge operations personnel, at this stage some paper work is also
done and then the vehicle is directed towards the loading dock. At this point in time the
whole checking and documentation process take an average 15 minutes.
14
The loading docks is then assigned by the traffic controlling personnel at the premises after
checking and analyzing the empty dock and arrange to park the container at the designated
dock. The process took around 7 minutes.
15
Z7
3 mins
Dock to Container
Palette Movement inside container
Z8
Z9
Z1
0
1 mins
1 mins
8 mins
13
mins
In Minutes
Z1
1
Z1
2
Z1
3
References
Based on Observations and DN data files received from Engro.
16
65
20
15
100
Please note that the idle time in both cases is quite significant in both cases, although it is less when
container is departing but this really is the area which needs to be addressed in order to reduce the
total TAT (Turn around Time).
The time drivers affect the process times for the drop-off activity in different ways. Some factors
determine an additional subtask during the delivery process. Many variables influence the activity
time through interactions with other variables. This means that the variable does not have a simple
effect on drop-off time; its effect depends on the existence of one or more variables.
Now in order to develop the time motion equation for the incoming goods we summarize different
time variables in different tasks as follows.
Drivers for Outgoing Goods (DN)
From Parking Area to Loading Dock and Plant Out
Time In
Variab
Subtasks
Minutes
les
From Parking Area to Gate
210
Z1
Gate ( Checking and Verification )
12
Z2
Gate to Weigh Bridge
5
Z3
Gathering of Information and Admin
Time
15
Z4
Dock Assignment
7
Z5
Vehicle Checking by QA (Quality
Assurance)
10
Z6
Total
262
Z7
Time In start Loading
Loading Time for 14 ft
Loading Time for 20 ft
Loading Time for 23 ft
Loading Time for 40 ft
Loading Time for 50 ft
Average Loading Time
7
120
196
165
225
255
192
Z8
Z9
Z10
Z14
Z15
Z16
Z17
65
20
15
Z11
Z12
Z13
17
Total
100
Z18
6.9 Conclusion
From this time motion study the new performance management process had a positive and near-term
impact on profitability and on the value of the company. If we analyze it critically and evaluate
certain parameters then we could attain potential time savings that would enable to establish as an
image and as a well-run company with increasing profitability in a highly competitive market. Its
profit turnaround, at least in part, will lead in becoming an attractive acquisition candidate. The time
equations revealed some idle capacity, facilitating the reorganization of some business processes and
the preparation of the company for the planned acquisition.
The time equation that is developed will also implies that in a complex distribution company as it
made a strategic transition from a sales-driven company to a profit driven one the management idle
time will lead to significant time savings. We confronted complex contingencies in its operations.
The company provides varied services to different types of distributors. It is also operated in a
seasonal business and needed to use cost rates that accurately reflected peak and slack periods in
capacity utilization.
Our initial attempt is to capture the complex, contingent operations with an appropriate time motion
study. We adopted the time-driven approach because we want to drive costs by transactions, not just
products and customers. The new time equations will enable us to reflect complex contingencies in
resource-consumption times. Here we have translated an extensive verbal description of a process,
such as would typically be provided by a frontline employee, into a time equation that will lead us to
estimate appropriate procedures accordingly.
OBSERVATION
Tabulated below is the efficiency of dock calculated based on the dock operation
18
DOCK EFFICIENCY
Size of vehicles
50' loaded / unloaded
40' loaded / unloaded
23' loaded / unloaded
20' loaded / unloaded
14' loaded / unloaded
Total Time
Time per dock
Total hours in Month
Total Docks
Efficiency of Dock
Cou
nt
57
261
149
253
574
Time*
228
783
298
506
1148
2963
370.37
5
720
8
51%
* Recommended time
Cause
There are several reasons behind the lower efficiency of dock such as
Manual pallets
Solution
-
Barcoding system can increase and simplify the flow of information; it can also be
linked with ERP, which can automatically update the inventory on dispatch.
19