0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views2 pages

United States v. LeClair, 10th Cir. (2008)

This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding a motion by the government to enforce an appeal waiver in the plea agreement of defendant Jesse LeClair, Jr. LeClair's counsel stated he saw no grounds to oppose the motion to enforce the waiver and requested permission to withdraw from the case. The court then allowed LeClair to file a pro se response, and in response LeClair requested to withdraw his appeal. As a result, the court granted the government's motion, dismissed the appeal, and denied the request by LeClair's counsel to withdraw as moot since the appeal was being dismissed.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views2 pages

United States v. LeClair, 10th Cir. (2008)

This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding a motion by the government to enforce an appeal waiver in the plea agreement of defendant Jesse LeClair, Jr. LeClair's counsel stated he saw no grounds to oppose the motion to enforce the waiver and requested permission to withdraw from the case. The court then allowed LeClair to file a pro se response, and in response LeClair requested to withdraw his appeal. As a result, the court granted the government's motion, dismissed the appeal, and denied the request by LeClair's counsel to withdraw as moot since the appeal was being dismissed.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

FILED

United States Court of Appeals


Tenth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

April 11, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.

No. 08-6000
(D.C. No. 07-CR-00171-M-1)
(W.D. Okla.)

JESSE LeCLAIR, JR.,


Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA, TYMKOVICH, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the governments motion to enforce the
appeal waiver contained in defendant Jesse LeClair, Jr.s plea agreement. The
motion is filed pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004)
(en banc). Defendants counsel filed a response to the motion to enforce stating
his belief that there are no meritorious grounds upon which defendant can urge

This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not
materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);
10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral
argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and
10th Cir. R. 32.1.

denial of the governments motion to enforce the appeal waiver, and he requested
permission to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)
(authorizing counsel to request permission to withdraw where counsel
conscientiously examines a case and determines that an appeal would be wholly
frivolous). This court then gave defendant an opportunity to file a pro se
response to the governments Hahn motion. In response, defendant filed a request
to withdraw his appeal.
Accordingly, the governments motion is GRANTED, the appeal is
DISMISSED, and defense counsels motion to withdraw is DENIED as moot.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT


PER CURIAM

-2-

You might also like