Suggestions For Support Services at ESRI India
Suggestions For Support Services at ESRI India
1. Use of Technology:
Majority of our support calls for critical issues demand a visit to the customer site and troubleshoot the
issue at client location. Sometimes we spend more time on travelling and less time on problem resolution.
Now many of our customers are wired through Internet. So, wherever possible, we can use remote desktop to
get into the customer’s machine where ESRI software is installed. Using the technology for remote access we
will have following benefits:
Sitting on ESRI India office, we can diagnose the problem and resolve it quickly.
There are complex instances where you need experts in specific areas and access to local resources.
This can be arranged quickly in-house and a joint effort can reduce the resolution turn-around time.
The conventional support mechanism does not help us to save our time, money and resources. On the
flip side, some of the organizations are security sensitive and may not allow us to make a remote
connection to their machine. There are customers who justify that our technical person should make
site visit to see everything that we have installed is working fine. In these cases, we can make onsite
visits as per existing support model
This will enhance our capability later on to extend the support to overseas location if a technical
support project is taken up.
2. Knowledge bank:
We should create and add to existing documents a set of knowledge bank of documents specific to support
services, which an analyst should be introduced at time of induction and should be able to refer to any time
while working within the support role.
The documents should essentially outline in detail the workflows, & procedures along with technical support
specific reference material an analyst should adhere to while working on day-to-day basis.
Some of the examples for the documents are listed below for understanding:
An analyst should be encouraged to have a basic understanding on where to find the specific
information within the support site as the users may be referring to this system or may have
already been through these documents before reporting the issue.
It’s time that we should bring them to use to infuse the same confidence in the support
analyst when he faces a question/ issue from a client in technical product/area out of his skill
expertise.
I recommend a question bank should be made for the analyst who might be experienced user
in one technology but is new to another ESRI product and does not know where to start on a
reported issue:
So we should provide him/her with a basic set of questions to be asked to customer for
starting troubleshooting on each of ESRI Product we support and a technical area within it.
It should have specific questions for sub parts of product based upon the area they are
reporting the issue for.
We should document the use of tools, which are more frequently used in support issues to
identify where the issue is, to reproduce the issues, to identify the cause of issue by using the
debugging tools. The effective use of these tools individually or in combination with other
tools, in various situations where they can be used to evaluate the issue, will subsequently
lead to a quick, efficient and better resolution of incidents.
We should not only maintain a document but also a central repository of these tools for
access to analyst both on intranet and Internet while they are at client location for
troubleshooting. Also hot links can be provided to locations where the latest version of these
tools can be downloaded.
3.1 Focused training should be imparted for working as technical support role: It includes both technical and
non-technical:
a) Incident management
b) Methodology for trouble-shooting any technical issue (GIS or Non-GIS)
Understanding on how to identify which area of technology this issue resides with.
Understanding on whether the issue is related to ESRI technology or non-ESRI.
c) Understanding the scope of support services.
d) Basic customer service skills:
Pacifying an angry customer,
Taking customer into confidence while working on a complex long duration issues.
3.2 Creating basic capsule for bringing the technical analyst on board – Should include basic introduction to
major ESRI products and on how to troubleshoot issues related to them.
For this purpose we should have a concept of training incident in our OTSS or may be a separate
application could be build to monitor the progress on analyst.
3.4 Identify the resource: We should identify the candidates on voluntarily basis and nurturing them as
specialists in one or more ESRI products.
3.5 Introduce innovative ways where we can conduct monthly technical quizzes to make the learning
interesting for analysts.
Additional Advantage: Once these courses are developed in house, we can fine-tune them to create
new short training capsules for users, which may like to learn a focused area in a product. Also we can
use these start a Web based GIS training given online by an analyst.
An easy n free environment should be provided to analysts especially the one’s which are in regional
offices to discuss the technical issues with their highly skilled peers. For this I will suggest a discussion
board should be created. Currently there is not platform like this is available within ESRI Inc’s support
services .
Discussion board:
A web based discussion board for support analyst should be in place to engage peer-to-peer support from
fellow analyst(s) in an informal discussion on day-to-day basis. “This will be a great boon for analyst working
in regional offices to connect with their counterparts in other regions and head office.” Some of the salient
points to be kept in mind are:
It can help us discuss about new enhancements and second thought on software defects, which we can send
to ESRI Inc on monthly or quarterly bases to improve the software needs of our users.
We can have a sub-part to discuss new ideas also and analysts can vote for them.
This will help the Head office to make a better business case for the enhancements and software defects to
be fixed on priority (No. Of customers facing this issue in India.)
I envision it as first to be initiated for support services only and later on to be open to whole NIIT-GIS where
support analyst can get suggestions from any other individual in consulting division (e.g. application
development team, database services) and vice versa.
It can be later be given access to business development executive(s) to ask queries which they may get from
the clients or in general while working on any specific RFP tender(s) from the whole set of technical
resources. Later on, the information can be double verified with the assigned analyst for the region to put it
in official documents as per the existing procedure.
A basic chat option should also be provided so that two people can discuss the issue in real time, if they are
online at same time in the system (their status being set online/offline).
The onus lies on the user who has raised queries to double verify the information before passing it to any
customer outside of company.
This will improve the communication between the analysts and they should be able to participate as per their
work schedule. This will create an atmosphere to collaborate on complex issues and will be a good team-building
platform.
5. Central repository for tools /document management system other than iniitian :
6. Technical Evaluation:
We should develop a methodology to evaluate quality of incident management by the analyst on both
technical and non-technical aspects. For this to happen we should first identify the key parameters to
assess the incident quality.
The parameters should be well documented in guidelines what they stand for and how the analyst will
be evaluated on this key areas. Also it should contain things to be kept in mind on how to achieve the
best rating on these parameters e.g. on scale of 1-5. The highest rating should be something which can
be achieved by not only meeting the set criteria for all the applicable areas but by over achieving some
of the criteria’s. They should be provided proper training on how to achieve the same in sample training
incidents.
The document should be provided (in central repository) and discussed in detail with the analyst before
they start talking live incidents.
Reporting technical manager of analyst can evaluate the incidents and they should be trained on the
evaluation pattern and criteria’s so that the ratings are normalized across the regions independent of
who evaluates at the end of day.
Below are some of the criteria’s, which can be referred for creating the final list:
Some of the key parameters should be developed for the survey focusing on criteria’s on which
we want to take users feedback on analyst performance.
It should be constant for all the incidents.
This can be done for random incidents/ or all the incidents for each analyst.
Technical manager should be able to send the customer survey on closed incidents, if they like to
at any time.
We should avoid to set the fixed time for resolution time on an individual incident as it drastically varies on
complexity of issues and response of user for any additional requested. Though we should try to achieve an
average feasible overall resolution time for an analyst in a given month/quarter/year.