Assumptions: Selling Expenses Is 3 % of Sales and Administrative Expenses Is 5 % of Sales
Assumptions: Selling Expenses Is 3 % of Sales and Administrative Expenses Is 5 % of Sales
Q1
Expected unit sales
Unit selling price
Total sales
54,000
100
5,400,000
Q2
54,000
###
5,400,000
Production Budget
Q1
54,000
54,000
Q2
54,000
###
###
54,000
54,000
6
324,000
324,000
324,000
8
2,592,000
Q2
54,000
###
324,000
###
324,000
324,000
###
2,592,000
54,000
0.50
27,000
16
432,000
Q2
54,000
###
27,000
###
432,000
Overhead Budget
Q1
UNITS
Rate
Total Overhead
Budgeted Income Statement
Sales
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
54,000
18
972,000
Q2
54,000
###
972,000
Operating expenses:
Selling expenses
Administrative expenses
Total operating expenses
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
162,000
270,000
432,000
2,376,000
475,200
1,900,800
162,000
270,000
432,000
2,376,000
475,200
1,900,800
Level 1
18,000
6
108,000
8
864,000
Level 2
20,000
6
120,000
###
960,000
Level 1
18,000
0.5
9,000
16
144,000
Level 2
20,000
0.5
10,000
16
160,000
Level 1
18,000
18
324,000
Level 2
20,000
18
360,000
Units of production
Direct materials
Direct Labor
Overhead
Actual
###
907,500
152,100
330,000
Direct materials
AQ
AP
220000
8.25
1815000
AQ
SP
220000
8
1760000
55,000 Unfavorable
AQ
AP
110000
8.25
907500
AQ
SP
110000
8
880000
27,500 Unfavorable
AQ
SP
110000
880000
8
(80,000)
Direct labor
AH
9,000
AR
16.9
152,100
AH
SR
9,000
16
144,000
8,100
Unfavorable rate variance
Variable overhead
Actual variable overhead
AH
SR
9,000
160,000
17
153,000
7,000
Unfavorable variable spending variance
Fixed overhead
Actual fixed overhead
170,000
Budgeted fixed
171,000
(1,000)
Favorable fixed spending variance
Q3
54,000
100
5,400,000
Q4
54,000
###
5,400,000
Total
216,000
100
21,600,000
Q4
54,000
54,000
Total
216,000
216,000
Q3
54,000
6
324,000
324,000
324,000
8
2,592,000
Q4
54,000
###
324,000
324,000
324,000
###
2,592,000
Total
216,000
6
1,296,000
1,296,000
1,296,000
8
10,368,000
Q3
54,000
0.50
27,000
16
432,000
Q4
54,000
###
27,000
###
432,000
Total
216,000
0.50
108,000
16
1,728,000
Q3
54,000
18
972,000
Q4
54,000
###
972,000
Total
216,000
18
3,888,000
Q3
54,000
###
54,000
expenses is 5 % of sales)
Total
21,600,000
10,368,000
11,232,000
162,000
270,000
432,000
2,376,000
475,200
1,900,800
162,000
270,000
432,000
2,376,000
475,200
1,900,800
648,000
1,080,000
1,728,000
9,504,000
1,900,800
7,603,200
Level 3
24,000
6
144,000
8
1,152,000
Level 3
24,000
0.5
12,000
16
192,000
Level 3
24,000
18
432,000
Total Variance
52,500 F
7900 F
30000 F
Difference
Quantity
80,000 F
16,000 F
19,000 F
Price
27,500 U
8,100 UF
11,000 F
SH
10,000
SR
SH
10,000
SR
SH
10,000
SR
16
160,000
(16,000)
Favorable efficiency variance
17
170,000
(17,000)
Favorable efficiency variance
19
190,000
(19,000)
Favorable volume variance
vorable total variance for materials. There is an unfavorable price variance due to
new material which is unique and high quality fabric that Miss Gloria Cateneze.
y used a more expensive material which could increase the quality of the product,
es and greater customer loyalty. The unfavorable price variance is $ 27,500 based on
y used. However, if we base it on the total materials purchased, the price variance would
unfavorable. The materials quantity variance is $ 80,000 favorable. The total units produced
units. At standard, the total materials to be used should be 120,000 square yards. However, the
rials used is only 110,000 square yards.
vorable total variance for direct labor. This is because the flexible budget for labor at 20,000 units
but the actual labor cost is only $ 152,100. The labor rate variance is $ 8,100 unfavorable. There is
ble labor variance due to higher average per hour labor because of bonuses paid to the workers for
ormal production volumes. The direct labor efficiency variance is $ $ 16,000 favorable. There is a favorable
ariance because the actual number of hours used is lesser than the number of hours that should be used at
oducing 20,000 units should have required 10,000 hours to produce at standards. During May, the company
000 hours.
erhead variance is $ 30,000 favorable. This is a result of a higher flexible budget for variable overhead costs
s compared to actual overhead costs of only $ 330,000. Budgeted fixed costs is $ 171,000 but the actual fixed
only $ 170,000. There is also a difference on the fixed costs because of the volume variance. The fixed overhea
only for 18,000 units but actual production is 20,000 units. This is called volume variance which is an unctrollab
rhead spending variance is $7,000 unfavorable. This is due to a higher actual rate per hour for variable overhea
ariance is $ 17,000 favorable. The standard requires 10,000 hours to produce 20,000 units but the company act
e. There is
orkers for
ere is a favorable
should be used at
May, the company