Prestress Lecture Notesfsfsfs
Prestress Lecture Notesfsfsfs
the
are
are
the
G.P.Ancog
G.P.Ancog
G.P.Ancog
members, friction losses will also be considered. For average steel and concrete
properties, cured under average air condition, tabulated percentages may be
taken as representative of the average losses.
Losses after transfer
Average Percentage
Posttensioning
1%
Pretensioning
of
3%
6
7
2
18%
5
6
3
15%
Anchorage take-up and friction losses will apply for post-tension members only.
N
Qi
Qi
sf
c
si
CB
CT
As
Beam Section
+
Due to Prestress
Due to DL
ST RE SS
Due to LL
_ +
Resultant Stress
VARI AT I O N
G.P.Ancog
Q iL
fL
= si
AsEs
Es
si
sf
fsL
Es
=
fcL
Ec
Q
(Qe)e
+
Ac
I
fA
f A e2
= s s + s s
Ac
I
si = sf + c
fc =
fcL
fL
fsiL
= s + E
Es
Es
c
fsi = fs + nfc
2
fsi = fs + nfsAs( 1 + e )
Ac
I
Q
2
fsi =
+ nQ( 1 + e )
As
Ac
I
Q
Q
e2
fsi =
+ n A (1+ 2 )
As
r
c
G.P.Ancog
load w
My/I
Qey/I
CB
CT
As
_ Mc/I
+ Q/A
+Qec/I
Beam Section Direct
Due to Prestress
Load Effect
Eccentricity
Due to Prestress
+
Resultant Stress
Due to External
Moment M
Due to Load
S T R E S S
V A R I A T I O N
Q
(Qe)y
+
+
A
I
Resultant Stress : f =
My
I
Q
+
CB
CT
As
Beam Section
+
Due to Direct
Prestress
ST R E SS
Due to Couple
C-Q
V A R I A T I O N
Resultant Stress : f =
_ +
Resultant Stress
Q
Q
+
y
A
I
G.P.Ancog
load w
load w
h
+
CB
CT
As
_
+
Due to Direct
Prestress
Beam Section
S T R E S S
Due to
Net Load w
V A R I A T I O N
_
+
Resultant Stress
Resultant Stress : f =
Q
M
+
y
A
I
yB
yT
As
Beam Section
+
+
Due to Prestress
_
Due to
Beam
Weight
+
Initial Resultant
Stress
_
Due to
Superimpsed
Load
+
Final
Resultant Stress
Requirements 1 and 2
Requirements 3 and 4
G.P.Ancog
MgYt
Q _ QeYt
> ft allowable at transfer
+
I
I
A
MgYt
Q
eY
> ft allowable at transfer
Top fiber stress
ft =
( 1 - 2t )+ I
A
r
QeYb _ MgYb
Q
< fc allowable at transfer
Requirement # 2: fc =
+
I
I
A
Q
eY
_ MgYb <
fc allowable at transfer
Bottom fiber stress
fc =
( 1+ 2b )
I
A
r
MY
MY
Q _ QeYt
Requirement # 3: fc = (
+ g t + s t < fc allowable at final
)
I
I
I
A
MY
Q _ QeYt
< fc allowable at final Top fiber stress
fc = (
) + It t
I
A
QeY
Q
_ MgYb _ MsYb > f allowable at final
Requirement # 4: ft = (
+ I b )
t
I
I
A
QeYb
MY
Q
> ft allowable at final Bottom fiber stress
ft = (
+
_ t b
)
I
I
A
Requirement # 1: ft =
I
r2 =
A
Mt = Mg + Ms = total moment due to dead load of beam plus superimposed load
Code
AASHTO
Pre-tension
Compressiv
e
Tensile
Compressiv
e
0.60 fci
Unbonded
reinforcements
0.40 fc
0.55 fci
ci
= .25
Bonded
reinforcements
f '
AASHTO
Posttension
= .62
ACI
0.60 fci
0.40 fc
Bonded =.50
f ci '
PCI
Posttension
0.60 fc
.25
f ci '
fc '
At precompressed tensile
f '
f '
ci
supports = .25
At ends of simple
supports = .50
Unbonded = 0.00
Severe exposure = .25
fc '
Tensile
0.45 fc
f ci '
c
zone = .50
Analysis base on
transformed cracked
section = 1.00
0.45 fc
fc '
0.00
G.P.Ancog
0.62
fc '
0.52
fc '
0.46
fc '
20.60 MPa
Temporary Jacking
Force
0.94fpy 0.80fpu
0.94fpy 0.80fpu
0.80fpu
Immediately After
Transfer
0.82fpy 0.74fpu
0.82fpy 0.74fpu
0.70fpu
After All
Losses
0.70fpu
0.70fpu
0.60fpu
Term Definitions
fpy = specified yield strength of prestressing tendons
fy = specified yield strength on non-prestressed reinforcements
fpu = specified tensile strength of prestressing tendons
fc = specified compressive strength of concrete
fci = compressive strength of concrete at time of initial prestress
Breaking Strength
Min. lb)
Nominal Area
(sq. in)
Nominal Weight
(lb/1000 ft)
Min. load at
1% Extension (lb)
(0.250)
5/16 (0.313)
3/8 (0.375)
9,000
14,500
20,000
GRADE 250
0.036
0.058
0.080
9
122
197
272
7,650
12,300
17,000
G.P.Ancog
7/16 (0.438)
(0.500)
3/5 (0.600)
27,000
36,000
54,000
(0.375)
(0.438)
(0.500)
3/5 (0.600)
23,000
31,000
41,300
58,600
3/8
7/16
0.105
0.144
0.216
GRADE 270
0.085
0.115
0.153
0.217
367
490
737
23,000
30,600
45,900
290
390
520
740
19,550
26,350
35,100
49,800
0.60
0.70
Nominal Breaking
Strength
(ib)
47,000
67,440
85,430
Nominal Weight
(lb/1000ft)
0.174
0.256
0.346
600
873
1176
10
G.P.Ancog
fc
0.5h
h
As
0.5fc
a ~ 0.65h
~
Q
Beam Section
Area of steel:
Mt
Mt
=
a
0.65h
As =
Q
Mt
=
fs
0.65hfs
Total prestress Q = Asfs is also the force Q on the section. This force will produce an
average unit stress on the concrete fc ave.
C
Q
Asfs
=
= 0.50fc (preliminary design)
=
Ac
Ac
Ac
Asfs
Required area of concrete section: Ac =
0.50fc
fc ave =
11
G.P.Ancog
Qh
Ac cb
kb
h
d
cgc
kt
cgs
Section
Properties
Q
Ac
Qo
Ac
ct
C
a = e+kt
cb
a = e - kb
Qo h
Ac ct
Just after transfer C at
bottom kern point
ST RESS
C
Qo
At final stage C
at top kern point
D I ST RI BU T I O N
Steps:
1. For the section obtained from preliminary design, the values of M G, kt, kb and Ac are
computed.
2. From the preliminary design section, locate c.g.s ( C at the bottom kern point)
M
e - kb = G
Qo
Stresses at top and bottom fibers will be:
Qo h
Qo h
ft = 0; fb =
A =
Ac ct ; c
fb ct
3. With the location of the c.g.s., compute the effective Q ( C at the top kern point)
f
Mt
Q=
and then Q o = Q( so )
;
fs
e+kt
Top and bottom fiber stresses will be:
Q h
Q h
fb = 0; ft =
Ac =
;
Ac cb
ft cb
4. Compute the required Ac by:
Qo h
Q h
Ac =
Ac =
;
fb ct
ft cb
5. Revised the preliminary section to meet the above requirements for Q and Ac.
1. Repeat steps 2 to 5 if necessary.
12
G.P.Ancog
cgc
kt
ct
kb
h
d
ft
As
cgs
a = e+kt
e- a
C
Qo
cb
a=
Section
Properties
MG
Qo
fb
Just after transfer,
C above bottom
kern point
ST RESS
D I ST RI BU T I O N
Steps:
1. From the preliminary section, compute the theoritical location of c.g.s. by
a = e - kb = MG/Qo
If it is feasible to locate c.g.s. as indicated by this equation, follow the first
procedure. If
not, locate c.g.s. at the practical lower limit and proceed as
follows.
2. Compute Q by:
Q=
f
Mt
and then Q o = Q( so )
;
ft
e+kt
G.P.Ancog
kt
cgc
ct
C
a = e+kt
kb
e1
e2
As cgs
cb
C
Qo
fb
fb
Stress Distribution
at Transfer
Section
Properties
ST RESS
Stress Distribution
at Working Load
D I ST RI BU T I O N
If tensile stress ft is permitted in the top fibers, the center of compression C can be
located below the bottom kern by an amount:
f I
f Ak
e1 = t
= t b
Q oct
Qo
For a given moment MG, the c.g.s. can be further located below C by the amount:
MG
e2 = Q
o
.
. . e1 + e2 =
MG + ftAkb
Qo
Qh
ftcb- fbct
4. Use the greater of the two Acs and revise the preliminary section.
1. Repeat steps 1 through 4 if necessary.
14
G.P.Ancog
For large ratios of MG/Mt, C will be within the kern at transfer, and the allowing of
tension on top fiber will have no effect on the design. The c.g.s. has to be located
within practical limits. Otherwise, the design is made as for the first case. The area of
concrete required is given by:
Ac
Qh
f t cb
Ac
Qo
fb
e ( M G Qo
kt
ft
cb
ct
kt
cgc
cgc
kb
cb
ct
in-place portion
cgs
cgs
fb
fb
The procedure of design follows closely the basic approach previously adopted
for noncomposite sections. It is essentially a trial-and-error process, simplified by a
systematic and fast converging procedure and assisted by the use of some simple
relations and formulas. One additional concept introduced for composite action is the
reduction of moments on the composite section to equivalent moments on the precast
portion. This is accomplished by the ratio of the section moduli of the two sections.
Steps:
1. Locate the c.g.s. For a given trial section, the c.g.s. must be so located that the
precast portion will not be overstressed and yet will possess the optimum capacity
in resisting the applied external moments. The c.g.s. must be situated as low as
possible but not lower than given by the following value of eccentricity: e = e 1 + e2
+ kb , where:
f I
e1= t
ctQ o
MG
e2 =
Qo
15
G.P.Ancog
I/ct
Ict
I/cb
mb =
Icb
mt =
Then we have
mtMC ct
mtMC
=
I
Ackb
mbMC cb
mbMC
fb =
=
I
Ackt
ft =
G.P.Ancog
The greater of the two formulas will control the Ac required for the precast portion.
The top fiber stress of the cast- in-place top flange can be computed by the formula
f = Mc/I, using the applicable values.
Alternative Flexural Design
A - Beam with variable Eccentricities:
tension
Qi
1
Ac
St
fcsi
f1r
ct
fti
t1
Mg
compression
h
cb
fcent
Let:
Q3e
Ac
Section
At support
t2 Mg
f2r
fts
fc1
Sb
At midspan
Qi
Qi + Mg
Qe + Mg
Qe + Mg + Mdl + Mll
St
Sb
1 M g M dl M ll
f cs f ti
1 M g M dl M ll
f ci fts
I St ct Sb cb
ct
Sb
h St Sb
where:
St = section modulus at top
Sb = section modulus at bottom
ct = top fiber distance
cb = bottom fiber distance
= prestressing efficiency
17
G.P.Ancog
ct
f ci fti fti
h
1 c
b ( f cs f ts )
h
f cent
f cent
unsymmetrical section
fts
symmetrical section
That prestressing initial prestressing force applied with eccentricity e, must produce a bending moment Qie, at the top
fiber:
Mg
Qi e
f cent f ti
St
St
Mg
Qi e
f cent fci
Sb
Sb
The required eccentricity:
e em f cent fti
St M g
Qi Qi
e em f cent fci
Sb M g
Qi Qi
em emax
B - Beams with constant eccentricity:
tension
compression
ft
ct
e = em
h
cb
2
1
Qi Stresses
Qe Stresses
fcent
Section
18
fb
G.P.Ancog
St
Sb
M g M dl M ll
f cs f ti
M g M dl M ll
f ci f ts
Qi e
f cent f ti
St
e f cent fti
St
Qi
e ( f cent fci )
Sb
Qi
Sb
1 M g M dl M ll
S t ; S Sb
f ci fts
St
1 M g M dl M ll
f cs fti
Sb ; S St
The concrete centroidal stress is computede based on service stress load condition 4:
f cent
1 cb
( f cs f ts )
h
fts
e em f cent fti
St M g
Qi Qi
19
G.P.Ancog
Vs
C
Q
max
Vc
C
O
Portion of Beam
fc
fc
Sc
St
Conventional Method:
1. From the total external shear V across the section, deduct the shear V s carried by
the tendon to obtain the shear Vc carried by the concrete: Vc = V - Vs
2. Compute the distribution of Vc across the concrete section:
VQ
= c v
Ib
3. Compute the fiber stress distribution for that section due to external moment M,
the prestress Q and its eccentricity by the formula:
Q + Qec+ Mc
fc =
A
I
I
4. the maximum principal tensile stress in St corresponding to the above and fc is
computed by:
f 2
fc
St =
+ ( c )
2
2
Limiting values for principal tensile stress in prestressed concrete:
St > 0.013fc to 0.033fc
G.P.Ancog
s=
Where:
Avfsv
Stbw
G.P.Ancog
V d+l M
cr < 1.70 fc bwd
M d+l
the shear force causing web-shear cracking can be found from an exact principal
stress calculation, in which the principal tensile stress is set equal to the direct tensile
capacity of concrete (conservatively taken equal to 4vf c according to ACI code.
Alternatively, the ACI code permits the use of the approximate expression:
Vcw= (3.5 fc + 0.3fpc)bwd + Vp
in which fpc is the compressive stress in the concrete, after losses, at the centroid of
the concrete section (or at the junction of the web and the flange when the centroid
lies in the flange) and Vp is the vertical component of the effective prestress force.
After Vci and Vcw have been calculated, then V c , the shear resistance provided by
the concrete, is taken equal to the smaller of the two values.
Calculating Mcr, Vci, and Vcw for a prestress beam is tedious matter because many
of the parameters vary along the member axis. For hand calculations, the required
quantities may be found at discrete intervals along the span, such as L/2,L/3,L/6 and
at h/2 from the support face, and stirrups spaced accordingly, or computer
spreadsheets may be used.
To shorten calculation required, the ACI code includes, as a conservative
alternative to the above procedure, an equation for finding the concrete shear
resistance Vc directly:
< 2 fc bwd
V d
Vc= (0.6 fc + 700 u )bwd
Mu
>5 fb d
c
in which Mu is the bending moment occurring simultaneously with shear force V u , but
Vud/Mu is not to be taken greater than 1.0
Contribution of shear reinforcement to the shear strength of the prestressed
beam:
Vs = Avfyd
s
The total nominal shear strength Vn is found by summing the contributions of the
steel and concrete, as indicated by:
Vu = Vn = (Vs + Vc)
Afd
= ( v y
+ Vc )
s
Normally, in practical design, the engineer will select a trial stirrup size, for which the
required stirrup spacing is found.
Avfyd
> 0.75h or 24 in.
s=
Vu - Vc
G.P.Ancog
bws
fy
Apfpus d
Av =
80fyd b
w
Av = 50
Mu
MT(LF)
=
(.8hfps)
0.8hfps
where:
LF = factor of safety or load factor
Assuming that concrete on the compressive side is stressed to 0.85f c, then the
required ultimate concrete area under compression is :
Ac =
MT(LF)
=
0.8hfps( 0.85fc )
Mu
.8hfps(.85fc )
which is supplied by the compression flange ( occasionally with the help of part of the
web). The web area and the concrete area on the tension side are designed to provide
the shear resistance and the encasement of steel, respectively. In addition, concrete
on the precompressed tension side has to stand the prestress at transfer.
Final Design.
23
G.P.Ancog
fc
cu=0.0034
0.85fc
a =1c
a/2
jd = d - a/2
As
s =fsu/Es
Section
T = Asfsu
fsu
Steel stress:
1d - a
fps =
> fpy
cE
s
a
a = 1c
Ultimate resisting moment: ACI
Mu = Asfps(d - a/2 ) = 0.85fcab( d - a/2 )
Mu = Asfps( d - a/2 )
a=
Asfps
fpsd
=
0.85fcb
0.85fc
T and I-sections
with N.A. falls
within the web.
p fpu
] members with bonded tendons
1 fc
fc
fps = fpe + 10,000 + 100 members with unbonded tendons with L/d< 35
fc
fps = fpe + 10,000 + 300 members with unbonded tendons with L/d > 35
fps = fpu [ 1 -
fps > [ fpy , fpe +30,000 psi ] min. for all cases
p = .55 for fpy/fpu not less than 0.80, typical high strength bars
p = .40 for fpy/fpu not less than 0.85, typical ordinary strand
p = .28 for fpy/fpu not less than 0.90, typical low-relaxation strand
PCI Code:
24
G.P.Ancog
1. Rectangular sections or flanged sections in which the neutral axis lies within the
flange.
Mu = Asfps d ( 1 - 0.60)
2. Flange sections in which N.A. falls outside the flange.
Mu = ( As-Asf )fpsd( 1 - 0.60)+ 0.85f c( b-b )t( d-.50t )
0.85fc( b-b )t
f
A -A
= ps ; = s sf ; Asf =
fps
fc
bd
3. Where information for the determination of fps is not available and provided that fpe
is not less than 0.50fpu the following values shall be used:
Bonded members
: fps = fpu( 1 - 0.50fpu/fc )
Unbonded members : fps = fpe + 15,000 psi or fps = fpe + 103 MPa
In ACI Code, .59 is used instead of 0.60.
Limitations on steel percentages:
0.85a < 0.36
1
d
fps
=
> 0.30, and when is greater than 0.30:
fc
1. Rectangular or flanged sections in which N.A. lies within the flange
Mu = 0.25fcbd2
2. Flanged sections in which N.A. falls outside the flange
Mu = 0.25fcbd2 + 0.8fc( b - b )t( d - 0.5t )
PCI
Ec = 1.80x106 + 500fc
Ec = 12.4x10
+ 500fc
psi
MPa
Load Factors:
U = 1.8( D + L )
U = 1.2D + 2.4L
U = 1.4( D + L + W )
Capacity Reduction Factors:
= 0.90 for flexure
= 0.85 for shear
Ec = 33w1.5
ACI
fc '
Ec = 0.043w1.5
fc '
psi
MPa
U = 1.4D + 1.7L
U = .75( 1.4D + 1.7L +
1.7W )
= 0.90 for flexure
= 0.85 for shear
G.P.Ancog
the section is overstressed under certain conditions of loading and whether the
deflections are excessive. Overstressing is objectionable because it may result in
undesirable cracks and creep and fatigue effects. When the design is of conventional
types and proportions, such checking becomes unnecessary, because it is then
generally known that designing by one method will yields safe results when checked
by the other. This is, in fact, the reason why such checking is not required of reinforced
concrete structures designed by the usual codes. When we delve into new types and
proportions, it is possible that elastic design alone will not yield a sufficiently safe
structure under overloads, while the ultimate design by itself might give no guarantee
against excessive overstress under working conditions. It is therefore deemed
desirable to apply both the elastic and the ultimate methods, especially for structures
of unusual proportions.
An understanding of both theories of design is also essential informing judgment
when designing structures. Sometimes, design based on one method will yield
different proportions from those based on the other.
DESIGN EXAMPES
Investigation Problem :
1. A prestressed concrete rectangular beam 20x30 has a simple span of 24ft and is
loaded by a uniform load of 3k/ft including its own weight. The prestressing tendon
is located as shown and produces an effective prestress of 360k. Compute fiber
stresses in concrete at the midspan.
w = 3k/ft
30
20
Prestress Q = 360k
24
Beam Section
at Midspan
Beam Elevation
G.P.Ancog
600 in2
45,000i
n4
15in
Stresses:
Q
Qey
My
+
+
A
I
I
360,000 + 360,000x6x15 + 216x1,000x12x15
=
600
45,000
45,000
= 600 + 720 + 864
= 600 - 720 + 864 = 744 psi for top fiber
= 600+ 720 - 864 = 456 osi for bottom fiber
f=
Stress diagram:
-720psi
600psi
Q
A
864psi
720psi
Qey
I
-864psi
My
I
744psi
456psi
Q + Qey + My
A
I
I
Solution 2: Apply the second concept of prestressing using the pinciple of internal
couple
method.
Take one-half of the beam as free body, thus exposing the internal couple. The
external moment at the section is:
27
G.P.Ancog
w = 3 k/ft
744psi
e
9
C
Q
456psi
Stress Distribution at
Midspan
M=
wL2
3x242
= 216 k-ft
=
8
8
The internal couple is furnished by the forces C = Q = 360k which must act at a lever
arm of:
M =C = Q
216x12
= M/Q =
= 7.2 in
360
Since Q acts at 9in from the bottom, C must be acting at 16.2 in from it. Thus the
center of the compressive force C is located.
= - e = 7.2 - 6 = 1.2 in.
Stress:
Q
Q y
+
A
I
360,000 + 360,000x1.2x15
=
600
45,000
+
= 600 144
= 744 psi for top fiber
= 456 psi for bottom fiber
f=
28
G.P.Ancog
w = 3k/ft
15
20
w = 2.5 k/ft
30
15
h= 6in
9
9
Section at
Midspan
24ft
Beam Elevation Showing Superimposed Load
and Equivalent Tendon Upward Force
The upward uniform force w from the tendon on the concrete is obtained from:
1
Qh = wL2
8
8Qh
w = 2
L
= 8x360x(6/12)
242
= 2.5 k/ft
Hence the net downward load on the beam is w = 3.0 - 2.5 = 0.5 k/ft, and the
resulting moment due to this net load is:
2
2
M = wL = 0.5x24 = 36 k-ft
8
8
Stresses:
Q
My
+
A
I
360,000 + (36x1,000x12)15
=
600
45,000
= 600+ 144
= 744 psi for top fiber
= 456 psi for bottom fiber
f=
Stress Diagram:
600psi
30
20
144psi
600psi
Section at
MIdspan
-144psi
Due to axial
prestress Q
744psi
Due to moment
of net load w
456psi
Resultant
stress
Design Problem:
29
G.P.Ancog
ft
fb
fso
fs
= 1.60 ksi
= 1.80 ksi
= 150 ksi
= 125 ksi
Solution:
Preliminary Design: h = k
MT
Trial section:
16
Section Properties
cgc
kb
18
36
kt
cgs
A1 = 4x16 = 64
A2 = 4x16 = 64
A3 = 4x28 = 112
Ac
= 240 in2
18
4
A3
16
16
A1
A2
16
Trial Section
MG + ftAkb
= 40x12+0.3x240x9.32 = 5.84 in
Qo
196.92
Hence c.g.s. can be located 5.84 below the bottom kern or 2.84 above the bottom
fiber.
Compute the net moment to be carried by the prestress:
30
G.P.Ancog
The lever arm a = kt + e = 9.32 + ( 9.32+5.84 ) = 24.48 in. and the required
prestress:
M - f Ak
320x12 - .24x240x9.32
Q = T b t =
= 134.93 k
a
24.28
Q o = Q(fso/fs) = 134.93(150/125) = 161.92 k
d1
kt
cgc
kb
cb
A2
36
d2
y2= 20
ct
yc
y1= 2
A1 = 4x18 = 72
y1 = 2.0 A1y1 = 144.00
A2 = 4x32 = 128
y2 =20.0 A2y2 = 2560.00
Ac
= 200 in2
Aiyi =2704.00
yc = ct = (Aiyi )/Ac = 13.52 in, cb = 22.48 in.
d1 = 11.52in, d2 = 6.48in
I1 = (1/12)bt3 + A1xd12 = 18x43/12+72x11.522 = 9651.15
I2 = (1/12)bt3 + A2xd22 = 4x323/12+128x6.482 = 16297.43
I
= 25948.58 in4
2
kt = r /cb = ( I/A)/cb =(25948.58/20)/22.48 = 5.77
kb= r2/ct = ( I/A)/ct =(25948.58/20)/13.52 = 9.59
cgs
4
Trial Section
G.P.Ancog
Locate c.g.s:
MG
210x12 = 12.79 in.
=
Qo
196.92
e = 12.79 + kb = 12.79 + 9.59 = 22.38 in
e - kb =
The eccentricity e = 22.38 in. is almost equal to c b which is not feasible. We fix the
location of c.g.s. 3 in. above bottom fiber; then no tension will be in top fiber. The new
value of e:
e = cb - 3 = 19.48 in.
and the lever arm a:
a = e + kt = 19.48+ 5.77 = 25.25 in.
Compute the amount of prestress required:
M - f Ak
320x12 - .24x200x5.77
Q = T b t =
= 141.11 k
a
25.25
Q o = Q(fso/fs) = 141.11(150/125) = 169.33 k
To keep the bottom fiber stress within limits, we compute the required concrete area
from:
Qo
e - (MG/Q o)
(
Ac =
1+
)
fb
kt
169.33 (
1 + 19.48 - 210x12/169.33 ) = 169.03 in2
=
1.80
5.77
To keep the top fiber stress within limits, we compute the required concrete area from:
Qh
141.11x36
Ac =
= 155.24 in2
=
ftcb- fbct
1.6x22.48 - 0.24x13.52
Ac = 169.03 in2 controls and the area furnished from our trial section is 200 in 2 which
may be reduced if desired.
Load Balancing Problem:
4. A double cantilever beam is to be designed so that its prestress will exactly balance
the total uniform load of 23.5 kN/m on the beam. Design the beam using the least
amount of prestress assuming that the c.g.s. must have a concrete protection of
75mm. If a concentrated load P = 65 kN is applied at the midspan, compute the
maximum top and bottom fiber stresses.
32
G.P.Ancog
P = 65 kN
w = 23.5 kN/m
750
300
6m
6m
15m
Beam
Section
Solution:
In order to balance the load in the cantilever, the c.g.s at tip must coincide with
the c.g.c. with a horizontal tangent.
To use the least amount of prestress, the eccentricity over the support should be
a maximum.
h = 750/2-75 = 300 mm or 0.30 m
The prestress required:
wL2
Qh =
2
wL2
23.5x62
=
Q=
= 1410 kN
2h
2x.30
In order to balance the load at midspan, using the same prestress Q = 1410 kN, the
sag of the parabola h1 must be:
wL2
Qh1 =
8
wL2
23.5x152
=
= 0.468 m
h1 =
8Q
8x.1410
Under the combined action of the uniform load and prestress, the beam will have no
deflection anywhere and the uniform compressive stress:
Q
1410x103
= 6.267 MPa
fc =
=
Ac
(300x750)
Due to P = 65 kN:
M=
33
G.P.Ancog
Q
+ 6M
Ac
bh2
1410x103 + 6x243.75x106
=
(300x750)
300x7502
= 6.267 + 8.667
= 14.934 MPa for top fiber
= -2.40 MPa for bottom fiber
f=
75
h1 = 468
h=300
6m
h=300
15m
207
6m
Cable Profile
10
30
Vc=100k
505
60
250
300k
Vs=50k
Portion of Beam
Section
Fiber stress
Shear stress
Under Working Load Condition
Solution:
Under working load, the shear carried by the tendon is
Vs = 300xsin = 300(1/6) = 50k
Vc = V - Vs = 150 - 50- = 100k
Consider the state of stress at centroidal axis:
34
G.P.Ancog
3V
2A
3(100x1000)
=
= 250 psi
2(10x60)
f/2 = 505/2 = 252.5 psi
35
G.P.Ancog
18
Ac = 245 in2
As = 1.75 in2
Ic = 24,200 in4
ct = 13.1 in, cb = 15.9 in.
d1 = 11.52in, d2 = 6.48in
r2 = Ic/Ac = 99 in2
243.5
ct=13.1
e = 11.4
cgc
cb=15.9
19
29
Section Properties
12
Section
e10
10
15
e=11.4
50
15
Cable Profile
Solution:
At a distance from the support, the tendon eccentricity is:
10
e10 = 11.4 x
= 7.6 in.
15
The effective depth d at 10 ft from the support, d = 13.1+7.6 = 20.7 in.
According to the ACI Code, the larger value of d = .80h = .8x29 = 23.2 in will be
used.
Calculate Vci at 10 ft from support:
The bottom fiber stress due to effective prestress acting alone is:
c2 = cb = 15.9 in
Q
e10c2
288,000
7.6x15.9 = 2,610.34 psi
f2pe =
)
Ac ( 1 + r2 )= 245 ( 1 +
99
36
G.P.Ancog
The moment and shear at the section due to beam self weight alone are,
respectively:
wx
Mo,10 = o ( L - x ) = 0.255x10 ( 50 - 10 ) = 51 k-ft
2
2
Vo,10 = wo( L/2 - x ) = 0.255( 50/2 - 10 ) = 3.825 k
and the bottom fiber stress due to this load is:
Mo c2
(51,000x12)15.9 = 402.10 psi tension
f2o =
=
I
24,200
Compute the cracking moment, Mcr:
I
Mcr = c (6 fc + f2pe - f2o ) = 24,200 ( 6 5,000 + 2,600 - 402.10 )
c2
15.9
= 3990966.69 in-lbs / 12 = 332580.56 ft-lbs
The ratio of the superimposed load shear to moment at the section is:
Vd+l
w( L/2 - x )
L - 2x
=
=
Md+l
wx/2( L - x )
x( L - x )
50
2x10
=
= 0.075
10(50 - 10)
Then Vci can be computed from:
Vd+l
Vci = 0.6 fc bwd + Vo + M
< 1.7 fc bwd
d+l
= [ 0.6 5000 (5x23.2) + 3825 + 0.075(332580.56 ] / 1000
= 30.32 k
1.7 fc bwd = 1.7 5000 (5x23.2)/1000 = 13.94 k < 30.32 k, Vci ok
G.P.Ancog
s=
Avfvyd
= .85x.22x40,000x23.2
= 17.75 in
Vu - Vc
35.55x103 - .85x30.32x103
s = 15.75 in
s = 15.75 in governs.
Required spacing s:
Avfvyd
= .85x.22x40,000x23.2
s=
= 8.12 in
Vu - Vc
35.55x103 - .85x16.69x103
The simpler but conservative approach yielded more stirrups!
G.P.Ancog
As =
Mu
640x12
=
= 1.346 in2
(.80hfps)
0.9(.80x36 )220
18
d= 32
27
36
12
Section
b = 18 in
b = 5 in
t = 4 in
d = 32 in
As = 1.346 in2
fc = 4.0 ksi
fps = 220 ksi
1 = 0.85
= As/(bd) = 0.0023368
= fps/fc = 0.12852
c = 1.18d/1= 5.709 in > t = 4 in
N.A. is within the web
Asf = (.85fc(b-b)t)/ fps = 0.8036 in2
As - Asf = 0.5424 in2
New value of :
= (As - Asf)/(bd) = 0.0033875
C=T
.85fcab + Asffps = ( As - Asf )fps
a=
From:
39
G.P.Ancog
Spalling zones
b
Idealization of the anchorage zone for
analysis
Rational design for the reinforcement for end zones must recognize that
horizontal cracking is likely. If adequate reinforcement is provided, so that the cracks
are restricted to a few inches in length and to 0.01 in. or less in width, these cracks
will not be detrimental to the performance of the beam either at service load or at the
overload stage. It should be noted that end-zone stresses in prestressed concrete
beams do not increase in proportion to loads. The failure stress fps in the tendon at
beam failure is attained only at the maximum moment section.
For pretensioned members , a very simple equation has been proposed for
end-zone reinforcement:
Qh
At = 0.021 i
fslt
where
G.P.Ancog
g e
Qi
Qi
e
( 1- 6
)
bh
h
Qi
e
( 1+ 6 )
bh
h
C
V
2
Qi
0
3
l
Qi
e
( 1+ 6 )
bh
h
Any longitudinal section through the anchorage zone at a distance y from the
bottom fiber is subjected to a bending moment, which can be determined from the
forces that are acting on the ends of the block.
The bending moment may be determined for any longitudinal section as follows.
For the end block shown, two cases can be considered:
1. For y < g:
41
G.P.Ancog
y 3
y2
h
- (3+
)
)
(
h
2e h)
M = Q ie 2(
M = y
(h
Q ie
2. For y > g:
y
M
= 2(
h
Q ie
y
h
h
( 3+ 2e
)
) - ( 3+ 2e )( h ) +
h y
h in dimensionless form and considers
(
1)
e h
2e clockwise moment as positive.
240k
12
e=12 5
3.5
60k
3
12
60k
3
9
h=36
8. The figure shows the end portion of a post-tensioned beam. The beam has an
interior I-shaped section and solid rectangular end blocks. The arrangement of the
post-tensioning steel is as shown in the figure. There are six cables anchored at the
ends, exerting 60 k each on the beam. It is required to design the vertical
reinforcement for the end block.
Solution:
Moment at various horizontal planes can be calculated as follows: Q i = 360k, e = 12.5
in., h = 36 in.
For 0 < y < 3 in. :
42
G.P.Ancog
M = 360x12.5 2(
y
36
36
) - (3+ 2x12.5)(36 )
from which:
M = - 0.1929y3 + 15.417y2
When 3 < y < 9 :
M = - 0.1929y3 + 15.417y2 - 240y + 720
When 9 < y < 12 :
M = - 0.1929y3 + 15.417y2 -300y +1260
ad when y > 12 :
M = - 0.1929y3 + 15.417y2 - 360y + 1980
M,
k-in
+15.2
2.0
+60.1
3.0
+133.5
4.0
-56.8
5.0
-118.7
6.0
-206.7
7.0
-270.7
8.0
-312.1
9.0
-333.1
10.
0
11.
0
12.
0
13.
0
14.
0
-391.2
-431.3
-453.3
-518.4
-567.7
y,
in.
19.
0
20.
0
21.
0
220
.
23.
0
24.
0
25.
0
26.
0
27.
0
28.
0
29.
0
30.
0
31.
0
32.
0
M,
k-in
-617.7
-596.5
-567.7
-532.3
-491.6
-446.6
-398.6
-348.7
-298.1
-247.9
-199.2
-153.3
-111.3
-74.3
43
G.P.Ancog
15.
0
16.
0
17.
0
18.
0
-602.3
-623.5
-632.2
-630.0
33.
0
34.
0
35.
0
36.
0
-43.5
-20.1
-5.2
0.0
We can assume that x = 8 in., approximately h/4, and calculate the area of end-zone
reinforcement:
Mmax
At =
fs( h - x )
632.2x1000
=
20,000( 36 - 8 )
= 1.1289 in2
Using #4 closed stirrups, Av = 2x0.20 = 0.40 in2 , total number needed:
n = At/Av = 1.1289/0.40= 2.82, use 3 closed stirrups.
12
e=12 5
3.5
60k
3
12
60k
3
9
h=36
x=8
[email protected] = 33
240k
2
l=h=36
Anchorage Zone
G.P.Ancog
ft = +2.00 MPa, fb = + 1.10 MPa. Initial prestress fso = 1030 MPa, effective prestress
fse = 860 MPa.
Solution:
To assume the section, make a preliminary design, assuming a lever arm of
0.65h for the prestressing force in resisting the total moment.
Q
MT
435 x10 3
743.589 kN
0.65h 0.65(900)
Compute Qo:
f so
1030
743.589
890.577 kN
f se
860
For the inverted T-section, the concrete area required can be approximate by:
Qo Q
Ac 1.5
Q
890.577 x10 3
1 .5
107731.08 mm 2
fb
12.40
From this preliminary section, sketch a trial section and proceed to final design.
in-place portion
1500
100
170.4
cgc
900
484.6
100
cgc
629.6
cgs 315.4
100
355
G.P.Ancog
0.09578
I ' c t ' 24.4825 x10 9 170.74
mb
I cb
6.656 x10 9 315.4
0.5424
I ' c b ' 24.4825 x10 9 629.26
ft ' I
2.0(6.656 x10 9 )
30.845 mm
c t Qo 484.6(890.577 x10 3 )
MG
55 x10 6
e2
61.757 mm
Qo
890.577 x10 3
e e1 e 2 k b 30.845 61.757 130.189 222.791 mm
The cgs can be located at:
cgs c b e 315.40 222.791 92.609 mm from bottom fiber
Step 2: Compute mt, mb.
mt
I ct
6.656 x10 9 484.6
0.09578
I ' c t ' 24.4825 x10 9 170.74
mb
I cb
6.656 x10 9 315.4
0.5424
I ' c b ' 24.4825 x10 9 629.26
46
G.P.Ancog
M P mb M C f b ' k t Ac
e kt
Qo previous
Qo new
Qo previous
Qo new
30.845
890.577
35.328 mm
777.56
61.757
890.577
70.733 mm
777.56
M P mb M C f b ' k t Ac
e kt
1
fb
Qo
Qo e M G
kt
12.40
200.031
110373.67 mm 2
47
G.P.Ancog
Ac
1
ft
M P mt M C Qe
kb
11.00
130.189
67734.28 mm 2
Ac = 110373.67 mm2 controls and compare to Ac of trial section = 105500.00 mm2, a
little difference but considered acceptable and therefore there is no need to revise the
trial section.
The
The
The
The
The
symmetrical I-section
unsymmetrical I-section
T-section
inverted T-section
box section
The suitability of these section will depend on the particular requirements. The
I-section is has its concrete concentrated near the extreme fibers where it can most
effectively furnish the compressive force, both at transfer of prestress and under
working and ultimate loads. The more the concrete is concentrated near the extreme
fibers, the greater the will be the kern distances and the greater will be the lever arm
furnished for the internal resisting couple. However, this principle of concentrating the
concrete in the extreme fibers cannot be carried too far, because the width and
thickness of the flanges are governed by practical considerations, and for web must
have a minimum thickness to carry the shear, to avoid buckling and to permit proper
placement of concrete.
If the MG/MT ratio is sufficiently large, there is the danger of over-stressing the
flanges at transfer, and the concrete in the bottom flange can be accordingly
diminished. This will result in an unsymmetrical I-section, which when carried to the
fullest extent becomes a T-section. A T-section is similar to that for a reinforced beams,
is often most economical, since the concrete is concentrated at the top flange where it
48
G.P.Ancog
is most effective in supplying the compressive force. It may not be economically used,
however, where the MG/MT ratio is small, because the center of pressure at transfer
may lie below the kern point. Then tensile stresses may result in the top flange and
high compressive stress in the bottom section.
The unsymmetrical I-section with a bigger bottom flange, like a rail section is not
an economical one in carrying ultimate moment, since there is relatively little concrete
on the compression flange. However there is a great deal of material to resist initial
prestress. It can be economically used for certain composite sections, where the
tension flange is precast and the compression flange is poured in place. This section
requires very little girder moment to bring the center of pressure within the kern and
hence is suitable when the M G/MT ratio is small. When carried to the extreme, this
section becomes an inverted T-beam.
The box section has the same properties of I-section in resisting moments. IN
fact, their section properties are identical.
In summary:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
For economy in steel and concrete, it is best to put the concrete near the
extreme fibers of the compression flange.
When MG/MT ratio is small, more concrete near the tension flange may be
necessary.
When MG/MT ratio is large, there is little danger of overstressing at transfer,
and concrete in the tension flange is required only to house the tendons
properly.
If formwork is used only once, it may constitute a major cost of the beam,
so that irregular shapes for the purpose of saving concrete or steel may
not be in the interest of overall economy.
When the forms can be reused repeatedly, more complicated shapes may
be justified.
For plants producing precast elements, it is often economical to construct
forms that can be easily modified to suit different spans and depths
Unsymmetrical I- Sections
49
Box Sections
G.P.Ancog
of Steel
The arrangement of steel is governed by a basic principle: in order to obtain the
maximum lever arm for the internal resisting moment, it must be placed as near the
tensile edge as possible. If the cgs is very near the tensile edge, and if there is no
sufficient girder moment to bring the center of pressure near or within the kern, the
tension flange may be overcompressed at transfer while the compression flange may
be under high tensile stress.
Tension
MG
T
lower kern
T
High
compression
Section
Stress Distribution
MG
T1
C
MG + MS
T
C1
T1
Section
Partial Prestress
T1 for MG Only
Total Prestress
T for MG + MS
Another method sometimes used in order to permit placement of steel near the
edge is to prestress the structure in two or more stages; this is known as retensioning.
At the first stage, when the moment on the beam is small, only a portion of the
prestress will be applied; the total prestress will be applied only when additional dead
load is placed on the beam producing heavier moment on the section. thus the center
of pressure can be kept within the kern at all times, and the excessive tension in the
compression flange, as well as high compression in the tension flange can be avoided.
50
G.P.Ancog
top kern
C
Small
arm
cgs
top kern
Big
arm
T
cgs
Prestressing steel in both flanges reduces lever arm for resisting moment.
Error: Reference source not found
For certain sections, the tendons are placed in the compression flange as well as
in the tension flange. Generally speaking, this is not an economical arrangement,
because it will move the cgs nearer to the cgc and thereby decrease the resisting lever
arm. At the ultimate range, tendons in the compressive flange will neutralize some of
its compressive capacity, whereas only those in the tension flange are effective in
resisting moment. However, under certain circumstances it may be necessary to put
tendons in both flanges in spite of the resulting disadvantages. These conditions are:
1.
2.
3.
20
2.5
9.60
cgc
2.5
10.40
51
1.0
Dynacore Section
G.P.Ancog
219,000 ft lb
8
8
w L2 (8 x10) x 70 2
MS S
49,000 ft lb
8
8
w L L2 (8 x30) x 70 2
ML
147,000 ft lb
8
8
M D M G M S 219,000 49,000 268,000 ft lb
MG
I c 27100
57.5 in 2
Ac
470
r 2 57.5
kt
5.53 in
c b 10.4
kb
r 2 57.5
5.99 in
ct
9.6
M G 219,000
G.P.Ancog
fI 423x 27100 1
x 91,600 ft lb
c
10.4
12
This value in moment of 91,600 ft-lb may be found to be too high since its constitutes
22% of the total moment of 415,000 ft-lb. If fully utilized in design, it will appreciably
reduce the required amount of prestressing steel and hence the ultimate moment.
Furthermore, we will be using a great deal of tension in the bottom flange concrete,
which once cracked, may not be able to resist that tension. Hence it would be well to
use perhaps only half of that value in our first attempt to determine the required
prestress; thus:
M
h
1
91,600
Fe M T M 415,000
12
2
2
Fe 318,000 lbs
As
Fe 318,000
2.2 in 2
f e 145,000
7
No. of 16 in strands required = 2.20/A o = 2.20/0.1089 = 20.2 pcs. Using 20 strands,
we can check the stresses at transfer and under total load as follows.
Ft = 20(0.1089)(165,000) = 359,000 lb
Fe = 20(0.1089)(145,000) = 316,000 lb
e = cb = cover = 10.4 2.4 = 8.00 in.
Stresses at transfer:
Ft Ft ec M G c
Ac
Ic
Ic
359000 359000(8)(9.6 or 10.4) 219000 x12(9.6 or 10.4)
470
27100
27100
Top fiber:
fT = 763.829 1017.387 + 930.952 = 677.394 psi compression
Bottom fiber:
fB = 763.829 + 1102.169 1008.531 = 857.467 psi compression
These stresses indicate a near rectangular stress block, and a small amount of camber
under the girders own weight, which is usually desirable.
Under total design load:
53
G.P.Ancog
Fe Fe ec M T c
Ac
Ic
Ic
316000 316000(8)(9.6 or 10.4) 415000 x12(9.6 or 10.4)
470
27100
27100
Top fiber:
fT = 672.340 895.527 + 1764.132 = 1540.845 psi compression
Bottom fiber:
fB = 672.340 + 970.154 1911.143 = -268.649 psi tension
The top fiber compression is well within the allowable 0.45fc = 2250 psi, and the
bottom fiber tension is also less than the permissible 423 psi; this is expected when
choosing 20 7/16 in. strands.
To locate the strands at the end of the section, we assume that the strands are
spaced at a minimum of 1 in c.c. Depending on the hardware available and the
practice at the plant, this spacing may vary considerably. Further we will assume that
one point harping is preferred for simplicity of production (actually it frequently
happens that 2-point or 3-poinrt harping may be used, then the profile may be easily
arranged both for camber control and for stress control along the entire length of the
span), then we can make a tentative arrangement. IN order to produce no tension in
the top, the cgs at the ends should be within the kern. In order to produce a
rectangular stress block at the ends, the cgs should be at the cgc. In order not to have
the intermediate points control the design cgs should be located within a limiting zone.
The cgs at the end should also be located so as to produce the best camber effect.
Taking all this into consideration and using 4 strands for each web, a tentative
arrangement is shown below.
cgs
3 @1 3/4
=5 1/4
4
6 5/8
2 3/8
1 1/2 clear
cgs Location
4 @7/16 =1
Strand Location
Error: Reference source not found
Strand and cgs location
54
G.P.Ancog
The stress at the end can only be critical at transfer and will be computed as
follows, assuming no external moment.
f
Ft Ft ec
Ac
Ic
470
27100
763.829 479.443 284.386 psi compressio n, top fiber
763.829 519.397 1283.226 psi compressio n, bottom fiber
These stresses are well within the allowable range. Hence the design is
considered satisfactory so far as the flexural elastic stresses are considered.
Ultimate Strength:
Compute ultimate moment, PCI Code:
Mu1 = 1.8( D + L) = 1.8(415,000) = 747,000 ft-lb
Mu2 = 1.2D + 2.4L = 1.2(268,000) + 2.4(147,000) = 675,000 ft-lb
Mu = [Mu1, Mu2]max = [747000, 675000]max = 747,000 ft-lb
The expected actual ultimate resisting moment strength of the section may be
estimated as follows:
T ' NAo f su 20 x 0.1089(250,000) 545,000 lb
Ac '
Mu
545,000
128 in 2
.85 f c ' .85 x5,000
For width b = 8ft or 96 in and thickness of 1.25in, flange area = 120 in 2 with only
8 in2 to be additionally furnished by web fillets. Hence the center of compression can
be assumed at t/2 = 1.25/2 = 0.63 in. the lever arm at ultimate is approximately
computed as:
z = h cover t/2 = 20 2.4 0.63 = 16.97 in.
16.97
770,000 ft lb 747,000 ft lb
12
The 20-7/16 in. strands are just about right, while 19 strands would not have been
sufficient.
M ' T ' z 545,000
G.P.Ancog
Ec = 2,500,000 psi
Ft = (20x0.1089)(165,000) = 359,000 lb
M1 = Fty1 = 359,000(6.63 2.4) = 1,520,000 in-lb
M2 = Fty2 = 359,000(10.4 6.63) = 1,355,000 in-lb
L2
8EI
(70 x12) 2
2
2
Mg
(219000 x12) 2.86 in downward
6
8 EI 6
8 x 2.5 x10 27100 6
Hence the net camber at transfer, 1-day old is: 3.09 2.86 = 0.23 in, upward.
Mg
Depending on the age of concrete at which the additional dead load is placed,
the deflection will vary. If the dead load is added early, then after one year, the
amount of deflection or camber can be approximated by using an average value of E
= 3,500,000 psi, for 3,000 psi < f c < 6,000 psi and a creep factor of 1.80 for the
effects of prestress and dead load. Using the effective prestress of f c = 145,000 psi,
the deflection can be calculated as follows:
MD = 268,000 ft-lb
Fe = nAofse = (20x0.1089)(145,000) = 316,000 lb
M1 = Fey1 = 316,000(6.63 2.4) = 1,330,000 in-lb
M2 = Fey2 = 316,000(10.4 6.63) = 1,190,000 in-lb
L2
8EI
2
5
M D creep 1.8
2
1
3
6
(70 x12) 2
2
5
3
6
8 x 2.5 x10 x 27100
1.01 in downward
which indicates that, in the course of 1 year, the beam will have a maximum
downward deflection of 1.01 in., which probably will not be objectionable on a span of
70 ft. But it does indicate that either a more careful study of the camber and deflection
history is desirable, or that some means to reduce the deflection is needed, such as
placing the cgs at ends further below the present location.
The instantaneous deflection due to live load may be estimated using a higher
value of Ec =, say 3,800,000 psi. (immediate deflection).
56
G.P.Ancog
M L 147,000 ft lb
(70 x12) 2
L2 5
ML
(147000 x12) 1.26 in downward
6
8 EI 6
8 x3.8 x10 27100 6
1.26
1
which is
wL (358 80 240) x 70
23,700 lb
2
2
y1
6.63 2.4
316,000
3200 lb
35 x12
L 2
Net shear, assuming the prestress is already transmitted to the concrete, is:
V s Fe tan Fe
1075
125
435
1633 in3
Fe 316000
672 psi
Ac
470
Principal tension is:
2
f
672
f
672
S t v c c 99 2
14 psi
2
2
2
2
which is very low. However, the end block stresses should be considered and a certain
amount of web reinforcement used near the ends.
2
Loss of Prestress
Elastic shortening at transfer: Es = 27x106 psi, Ec = 2.5x106 psi.
57
G.P.Ancog
f ct
Ft 359,000
765 psi
Ac
470
27 x10 6
f s nf ct
765 8250 psi
2.5 x10 6
The loss at the level of tendons at midspan may be slightly higher since the fiber
stress in concrete is somewhat higher. This also indicates that the estimated loss of
10,000 psi from the initial prestress of 175,000 psi to 165,000 psi at transfer is fairly
good estimation.
Loss of prestress due to creep may be estimated at 2 times the elastic shortening,
thus:
f s 2 x8250 16,500 psi
Loss of prestress due to shrinkage may be estimated assuming a coefficient of 0.0003,
at
f s s E s 0.0003(27 x10 6 ) 8,100 psi
Total loss of prestress, excluding loss or gain due to bending of members, is,
f st 8250 16500 8100 32850 psi
which is fairly close to the assumed loss of 30,000 psi in the problem statement.
Design Example, Post-tensioned Bridge Girder
Precast girder of a highway bridge are to be post-tensioned, grouted, then lifted
to the bridge site to be connected together by concrete poured in placed, as shown in
the figure below. The two-lane bridge is to carry H20-S16-44 loading, and the girders
are spaced 6 ft on centers. Overall length of the girder is 96 ft, with 95 ft between
centers of supports. Maximum live load moment for one lane, M max = 1433 k-ft,
maximum live load shear, Vmax = 61.3 k/lane. The dead load due to 2 bituminous
paving is 150 plf and the in-place slab and diaphragm is 133 plf. The weight of the
girder is taken equal to 940 plf. Following the ASSHO specs for Highway Bridges, when
applicable, design the interior girder as follows:
(a)
Design the midspan section, indicating the required amount of
prestressing steel.
(b)
Design the end section, showing the mild steel stirrups.
(c)
Design the longitudinal layout of girder showing the profile for the cgs and
the intermediate and end diaphragms.
(d)
Investigate the factor of safety of the girder for cracking and ultimate
strengths.
(e)
Compute the deflection of the girder at transfer and under the working
load.
(f)
Detail the midspan and the end sections using the Freyssinet system.
58
G.P.Ancog
Compute the loss of prestress due to friction and the initial prestress required at
the jack. Strength of concrete is to be 4,500 psi at 28 days and 4,000 psi at transfer.
The high tensile steel used is to have a minimum ultimate tensile strength of f s=
250,000 psi and a minimum yield strength of f y = 200,000 psi at 0.2% plastic set. The
steel stress at transfer will be 165,000 psi and the effective prestress at 25,000 psi
loss is 135,000 psi. Es = 28,000,000 psi, Ec = 4,000,000 psi. Use intermediate-grade
reinforcing bars for the mild-steel reinforcement, fy = 40,000 psi.
48.0
6
5.0
24.0
18.5
Half Elevation
CL
4.5
2 bitumen surface
6.0 cc of girders
Midspan Section
Error: Reference source not foundSolution
a)
Maximum live load for 1 lane: Mmax = 1433 k-ft
For the interior girder spacing of 6 ft and a lane width of 10 ft:
6.0
M LL 1433
860 k ft
10
50
50
I
0.227 0.30, ok
L 125 95 125
Impact factor:
Impact moment:
M IL M LL ( I ) 860(0.227) 195 k ft
Total live load plus impact: M LL M IL 860 195 1055 k ft
M LL M max
S
10
59
G.P.Ancog
=
150 plf
=
133 plf
283 plf
940 plf
1 2 1
wL (.283)95 2 319 k ft
8
8
Added dead load moment:
1
1
M G wG L2 (.940)95 2 1060 k ft
8
8
Girder moment:
Total moment: M T M G M D M LL M IL 2434 k ft
MD
Section properties of the trial section which resulted from preliminary design and
trials.
6
3
38
7
22
x
x
x
x
x
54
3
8
7
8
=
=
=
=
=
324
9
304
48
176
862
972
63
7600
2040
8450
19125 / 862 = 22.5 in = ct
52 22.5 = 29.5 in = cb
The moment of inertia of the concrete section about cgc.
324(62/12 +
9(32/18
+
2
304(38 /12 +
49(72/18
+
2
176(8 /12 +
x
x
x
x
x
3
=
7
=
25
=
41.67 =
48
=
19.52)
15.52)
2.52)
19.172)
25.52)
=
=
=
=
=
60
124000
2200
38600
18000
115000
297800 / 862 = 345 = r2
G.P.Ancog
M G 1060
M T 2434 x12
786 k
a
37.2
25000
.1515 15%
For a loss of prestress of 165000
, the initial prestress required:
F
Fo
F
786
925 k
.85 .85
Fh
786 x52
770 in 2
f t c b 1.8 x 29.5
Ac
Fo
fb
e M G Fo 925
25.5 1060 x12 / 925
2
1
841 in
kt
2
.
2
11
.
7
Actual gross area provided is Ag = 862 in2, which seem s to be just about
sufficient for the required area of Ac = 841 in2.
It generally takes two or three trials to arrive at this adopted section rather than
just one trial as illustrated here.
61
G.P.Ancog
To supply the effective prestress of 786 k at an allowable stress of 135 ksi, the
required steel area is:
F 786
As
5.83 in 2
f s 135
b)
Shearing stresses can be checked for two sections, one at the support and
another at 5 from the support where the web is 8 thick. At the support the web is 22
thick; shear is evidently not controlling. At 5 from the support:
VLL = 61.3 k/lane
Vlane
S
6
61.3 36.8 k / girder
10
10
65.5 k
2
L
96
L 2
At 5.5 ft from end of girder:
Vs w
Vs
x
42.5
V max
65.5 58.0
L2
48
Hence Vc of concrete:
Vc 97.2 58.0 39.2 k
Compute the value of Q:
324
9
8
x
x
x
19.5 =
15.5 =
16.52/2=
Q
=
6318
139.5
1089
7546.5 in3
62
G.P.Ancog
Vc Q 39.2 x1000(7546)
124 psi
Ib
297800(8)
F 786 x1000
912 psi
Ac
862
Stirrups required:
Av
0.027538s in 2
2 f y ' jd
2 40000(7 8)(52)
G.P.Ancog
Av
0.40
Similar computations can be made for other points along the girder. So far as
shear is concerned, more stirrups are required near the ends than along the middle
portion of the girder, but the reverse is true when considering the effect of combined
moment and shear. Hence judgment should be exercised in the actual spacing of the
stirrups.
Minimum web reinforcements, AASHTO specs:
Av 0.0025b' s
For b = 8 in, Av = 0.40 in2:
Av
0.40
20 in
0.0025(8) 0.0025(8)
For the end section, stirrups are required to distribute the anchorage stresses.
Since the anchorage are fairly uniformly distributed, the computed tensile stresses in
the anchorage zone will be low and analysis is not required. Normal stirrups, however,
are provided.
s
c)
A half elevation of the girder is shown in the sketch layout. The midspan section
is adopted for the entire girder, except 5 ft near the ends where a uniform web
thickness equal to the bottom flange width of 22 in. is used in order to accommodate
the end anchorages, to permit the curving up of some tendons, and to distribute the
prestress. Three intermediate diaphragms are placed along the length of the span.
Sometimes transverse prestressing is employed to bind the girders together. But for
this design, transverse dowels are provided in these diaphragms to be joined together
by in-placed concrete. The amount of steel is not excessive for these diaphragms;
some nominal reinforcements are employed as shown on the sketch.
The most common location of cgs for a simple span is a parabola with cgs near
the cgc at the ends. Such a profile will give ample moment resistance along the entire
beam. If cgs is above the cgc at the ends, the tendons will carry greater shear but lose
some of the reserve moment resistance. If cgs is below the cgc at the ends, the
tendons will carry less shear, but the positive prestressing moment at the ends will
tend to decrease the principal tension. Also note that the cgcs for the midspan and
the end sections actually differ slightly. For this design, the cgs will be placed a little
below the cgc of the end section.
d)
Computation of cracking moment.
Resisting moment up to zero stress in the bottom fiber:
64
G.P.Ancog
M r Fa 786
37.2
2434 k ft
12
fI 630(297800)
1
530 k ft
cb
29.5
12 x1000
F .S .
M cr 2964
1.22
M T 2434
F .S .
1.50
M LL M IL
860 195
This indicates that the girder will begin to crack only when the live load plus
impact is increased by as much as 50%.
The ultimate resisting moment computation:
Assuming that the ultimate strength of steel to be developed:
T f s ' As 250000(5.83) x10 3 1460 k
Average compressive stress in concrete 0.85fc = 0.85(4500) = 3.82 ksi
4.5
6
y
3 fillet
Precast Diaphragm
Precast Diaphragm
3-2
4-4
1:1
8
1-10
Section
65
G.P.Ancog
C T
.85 f c ' A T
T
1460
382 in 2
.85 f c ' 3.82
6
x
54
=
324
3
x
3
=
9
8
x
c
=
8c
Total =
333+8c = 382; c = 6.125 in.
y = 6 + c = 12.125 in. from top (N. A. location)
A
x
x
x
3
=
7
=
9.0625 =
Total =
972
63
444.0625
1479.0625 / 382 = 3.87 in. cg below top fiber.
66
G.P.Ancog
M 1 L2 5M 2 L2
8 EI
48 EI
2
3
3
115.63 5(1850) 96 (12) x10
2.78 in
8
48 4 x10 6 (297800)
cgc
e1 =1.5
cgs
y = 2
parabolic
F = 925 k
Eccentricity of Prestress
-115.63 k
-1850 k
parabolic
parabolic
+1060 k
Moment Due MG
Diagram for Deflection Computation
f se
135000
p
2.78 2.345 in.
f so
160000
Downward deflection due to MG:
pe
1.47 in.
48 EI
48 4 x10 6 ( 297800)
G.P.Ancog
MD
319
G
1.47 0.44 in.
MG
1060
Long term deflection, assume creep coefficient Cc = 2.0, and loss of prestress:
M L I
1055
G
1.47 1.46 in.
MG
1060
f)
The above design will be applicable to most prestressing systems now in use
today, although minor modifications may be desirable for certain cases. For purpose of
illustration, detailed arrangement of the tendons is shown for the Freyssinet system.
Using cables of 18 - 0.196 in. wires, 11 tendons are required, Ao = 0.543 in2:
Steel area as required:
10
11
6
8
24.2
cgs
27.8
8
8
4- 4
8
10 11
cgs
4.2
4 1 2 3
8 5 9 6 7
3
3
2
End Section
End Elevation
Midspan Section
The midspan and end sections are drawn showing arrangement of tendons to
give the required locations of cgs. Curving the tendons in both horizontal and vertical
planes is necessary to conform with the required location of the cgs. It is noted that
that some deviation from the required parabola is permissible, because it will not
affect the strength of the girder. A recommended order for tensioning the cables is
indicated as shown.
Loss for anchorage slip in Freyssinet cones may be assumed to average 0.2 in.,
which if average throughout the entire length of 96 ft, indicates a loss of prestress
equal to:
68
G.P.Ancog
0.2
Es
28 x10 6 4900 psi
L
96 x12
8h 8(2)
0.167 radian
L
96
The maximum frictional loss at the far end, if tensioned only from one end is:
F2 F1 e ( KL )
e ( KL )
KL
% loss ( KL)100%
KL .35(.167) 0.0010(96) 0.058 0.096 0.154 or 15.4%
Ave. Fa F2
The controlling point is the midspan which has a loss equal to of total 15.4% =
7.7%.
Girder Layout
6
24.0
The
prestress should not exceed 0.60f s = 0.60(250000)=150,000 psi,
2 effective
0
4
or 0.80f2
=
0.80(200000)
= 160,000 psi. Hence the stress in the steel is considered
y
CL
safe in all conditions.
r @ 20
8@6
8@12
symmetrical
Half Elevation
Girder Layout
4.5
1 6
6.0 cc of girders
2 bitumen surface
6
Precast girder
Continuous key
4-4
3-2
Precast diaphragm
Precast diaphragm
1:169
cgs
1 10
Midspan Section
G.P.Ancog
8
Continuous Beams
Continuity, Pros and Cons
wc
Continuous Beam
Simple Beam
w
wc
a
V=0
a
V
L/2
L/2
V=0
C
T
w' L2
T ' a'
8
wc ' L2
2T ' a '
8
Moment Diagram
Continuous Span
Moment Diagram
Simple Span
Load-Carrying Capacity Of
A Continuous Beam
Load-Carrying Capacity Of
A Simple Beam
Let:
T = ultimate tension developed in the tendons
a = lever arm
w = ultimate load produced by tendons
Simple beams:
70
G.P.Ancog
w' L2
T ' a'
8
8T ' a '
w' 2
L
Continuous beams:
wc ' L2
2T ' a '
8
16T ' a '
wc '
L2
The ultimate load w carried by the simple beam is controlled by the capacity of
the midspan section and cannot be increased by any change in the end eccentricities
of the cgs.
For the continuous beam, there are two resisting moments, one at midspan and
another over the support. Hence the load-carrying-capacity is definitely affected by
the position of the cgs over the intermediate support. w c = 2w, this means that twice
the load on the simple beam span can be carried by the continuous span for the same
amount of concrete and steel. This represents a very significant basic economy that
should be realized by engineers designing prestressed concrete structures. Because of
this strength inherent in continuous construction, it is possible to employ smaller
sections for the same load and span, thus reducing the dead weight of the structure
and attaining all the resulting economies.
Although it is generally conceded that continuity is economical in reinforced
concrete, it is seldom known that, from certain point of view, even greater economy
can be attained in prestressed construction.
Economical design of continuous prestressed beams can be achieved in several
ways. Owing to the variation of moment along the beam, the concrete section and the
amount of steel are often varied accordingly. The peak of the negative moments can
be reinforced with non-prestressed steel, thus reducing the amount of prestressing
steel. Advantage can be taken of the redundant reactions to obtain favorable lines of
pressure in the concrete. Design can be based on the ultimate strength of such beams,
applying the principles of limit design.
Like any other type of construction, there are advantages and also
shortcomings, which, under certain conditions, could outweigh the advantages. The
choice of a particular type of design must be made after considering all the factors
involved in the job.
Disadvantages inherent in continuous prestressed concrete beams can be
enumerated as follows:
71
G.P.Ancog
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
72
G.P.Ancog
Precast elements can also be made fully continuous by coupling the tendons
together with a high tensile rod and then stressing one or both ends of the tendons.
Fully continuous beams tendon layouts:
Curve tendons with straight beam, often used for slabs or short span beams, where simple formworkis more important than saving of steel and concrete. The main object
Haunched or curve beams, often used for longer spans or heavier loads, this will not only save concrete and steel but permit the use of straight tendons, likewise position
Compromise of the above two arrangements, using curve beams and slightly curve tendons. This would permit optimum depth of beam as well as ideal position of steel
Overlapping tendons. Cables protruding at intermediate points offer a possibility of varying prestressing force along the beam. The arrangement has no reversed curves i
73
G.P.Ancog
Continuous prestressed cables placed in conduits or grooves left in the structure. After erection, concrete is poured between the beams over the supports
Continuous tendons placed over the supports only. This saves steel but requires more anchorages than first layout. More of the anchorages are placed at
Supplying continuity using cap cables. These tendons are usually made of wires or small strands, can be conveniently stressed from the soffit of the bea
Continuous elements over the supports transversely prestressed. Tensile elements are are inserted over the supports and attach them to the precast beam
74
G.P.Ancog
Temporary anchorage
Tend
coupler
Poured-in-place concre
Coupler over supports. This is specially applicable to high-tensile bars, but also to other forms of tendons to obtain continuity. This permits the stressing
75
G.P.Ancog
In-place concrete
nonprestressed steel
Beam Elevation
e
T
C
M = Te = Ce
R=0
FBD of Section
Beam Elevation
For simple beam, no matter how the beam is prestressed, only the internal stresses
will be affected by prestressing. The external reactions, being determined by statics,
will depend on the dead load and live load (including the weight of the beam). Without
load on the beam, no matter how the beam is prestress internally, the external
reactions will be zero, hence the external moment will be zero. With no external
moment on the beam, the internal resisting moment must be zero, hence the C-line
beam under prestress
not held bywith
supports.
(line of pressure Bending
in the ofconcrete)
must if
coincide
the T-line in the steel (which is the
cgs line). The C-line in the concrete being known, the moment in the concrete at any
section can be determined by:
M Te Ce
Moment of concrete due to prestressing in a continuous beam:
Reactions exerted to hold the beam in place.
M
cgs line
or T-line
a=
76
M
T
Deviation of C-line from cgs line due to moment produce by secondary reactions.
G.P.Ancog
When the continuous beam is prestressed, it bends and deflects. The bending of
the beam can be such that the beam will tend to deflect itself away from the suuports.
If the beam is refrained from deflecting at these supports, reactions must be exerted
on the beam to hold the it there. Thus reactions are induced when a continuous beam
is prestressed. These induced reactions produce moments in the beam. To resist these
moments, the C-line must be at a distance a from the T-line, such that the internal
resisting moment equals the external moment M caused by the induced reactions.
a
M
T
In simple beam, the C-line coincides with the T-line. The stress distribution in the
concrete at any section is given by the location of the T-line. No secondary moment is
created. In continuous beams, the C-line usually deviates from the T-line. The stress
distribution at any section is given by the C-line which does not coincide with the tline. The difference between the two beams lies in the presence of external reactions
and moments in the continuous beam, produced as a result of prestressing. Since the
external moment is soley produced of external reactions, and since the reactions are
only applied at the supports, the variation of moment between the supports is a linear
one.. If T remains constant between supports, then the deviation a, being directly
proportional to M, also has to vary linearly.
77
G.P.Ancog
The difference between the simple and a continuous beam under prestress can
be represented by the existence of secondary moments. Once these moments over
the supports are determined, they can be interpolated for any point along the beam.
Moment in the concrete given by the eccentricity of the prestressed is
designated as the primary moment, such as would exist if the beam were simple. On
account of the primary moment acting on a continuous beam, the secondary moments
caused by the induced reactions can be computed. The resulting moment due to
prestress, then is the algebraic sum of the primary moment and secondary moment.
Secondary moment + Primary moment = Resulting moment
Assumptions for the Method of Analysis and Design Adopted:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
M 1 Fe1
e2 =
M2
F
cgs-line
Procedure of Analysis:
1.
2.
3.
M1 = Fe1
First treat the entire beam as if it had no supports. Plot the moment
diagram for the concrete produced by the eccentricity of the prestress.
Compute the(b) Primary
loading
on Diagram
the beam
ccorresponding to that moment
Moment
Due To Prestress
diagram. This is the loading produced by the steel on the concrete.
With this loading acting on the continuous beam as it is actually
supported, compute the resulting moment by moment distribution or other
similar method.
(c) Shear Diagram For (b)
M2
78
G.P.Ancog
Since the C-line deviates linearly from the cgs-line, it will have the same intrinsic
shape as the cgs-line, and can be plotted. It is usually not necessary to compute the
secondary moment, which is represented by the deviation from the C-line and the cgsline. If desired, it can be computed by the simple relation:
Secondary moment = M2 M1
M 2 M1
F
Hints for plotting the loading diagrams directly from the moment diagrams:
1.
At the end of the tendons, the force F from the tendons on the concrete
can be resolved into 3 components:
A.
An axial force, Fcos1 = F (since cos 1 =1), acting at the end of the
anchorage. This is usually has no effect on the bending moment but
may produce moment in a rigid frame, owing to the axial shortening
effect.
B.
A transverse force Fsin1 = F1 = Ftan1, applied at the support and
balanced by the vertical reaction from the support directly beneath.
This again produces no moment in a continuous beam, unless it is
applied away from the support. Its effect in a rigid frame is small.
79
G.P.Ancog
F5
Forces From Tendons On Concrete
C.
2.
F4
A moment, Fcos1e = Fe, acting at the end of the beam. This will
produce moment along the entireFlength
of the continuous beam
3
and it must be included when following the moment distribution
procedure.
F2
Along the span of the member, where the cgs or the cgc-line of the
member curves, transverse loads are applied to the concrete. Two
common cases can be considered:
A.
When the moment diagram takes the shape of a parabolic or a
circular curve (note: owing to the assumption of a flat curvature,
parabolic and circular curves are considered to have the same effect
in producing transverse loads), a uniformly distributed load is
applied to the concrete along the length of the curve. The total force
on each curve is given by the change in slope between the two end
tangents; thus the total force at 2 is given by:
W F sin 2 F 2
B.
3.
F sin 4 F 4
Over the interior supports, where the moment diagram changes direction,
a load is applied directly over these supports. Again two cases can be
considered:
A.
If the moment diagram curves gradually over the support, again a
uniformly distributed load is applied as shown for 3. This will affect
moments in the beam, and the load must be considered in
performing the moment distribution.
B.
If the moment diagram is bent abruptly over the supports, a
concentrated load is applied thereon. Such a concentrated load is
directly reacted by the support underneath and produces no
moments on the beam. It can be neglected in performing the
moment distribution.
80
G.P.Ancog
F = 250k
0.4
cgc-line
0.2
0.8
cgs-line
0.9
0.08
30
0.176 rad
D
20
250(-.20) = -50.00 k
250(-.80) =-200k
250(+.40) = +100k
250(-.90) = -225k
25
25
a) Beam Elevation
+100k
0.00
-50k
-225k
-200k
Mb = Ma + Av
Av = aL = Mb - Ma
a = [ -200 (-50)]/30 = -5
+15k
-5k
a = [ +100 (-200)]/20 = +15
[0 100]/25
= -4
[-225 0]2/25 = -18
-22
+[0 100]/50 = - 2
+20k
-24k
-24
[0 (-225)]2/25 = 18
-[0 100]/50
= 2
20
+20k
Vb = Va + Aw
P1 = [-5 0]
= -5
P2 = [15 (-5)] = 20
P3 = [-24 (15)] = -39
w = [20-(-24)]/50 = 0.88 k/ft
P4 = [0-(20)]
= -20
Example 1:-5k
-20k
-39k
FEM:
Concentrated load:
d) Loading Diagram From c)
A continuous
prestressed
concrete beam withFEM:
the load:
bonded tendons is shown in
MAB = (Pab2)/L2
Uniform
MAB = 20(30)(202)/502
= +96 eccentricity at A, is bent
MAB
= - MBA = wL2/12
the figure. The
cgs has an
sharply
at D and B, and has a
MBA = (Pa2b)/L2
MAB = -MBA = 0.88(502)/12
parabolic curve
the span
MBA = for
20(302)(20)/502
= -144 BC. Locate the line of pressure
= 183 (the C-line) in the concrete
due to prestress alone, not considering the dead load of the beam. Consider a
rel. k = 1
rel. k = 1
prestress of 250 k.
FEM
Dist
CO
Dist
Bal
-50
+96
-96
-50
-144
+183
-73
-29
-246
+92
-29
+246
-183
+183
0.00
cgc-line
0.2
C-line
0.45
81
0.61
G.P.Ancog
The line of pressure for the entire beam can be computed by plotting its moment
diagram and dividing the ordinates by the value of the prestress.
82
G.P.Ancog
50
0.20'
250
246
eB
0.98
250
eA
If desired the secondary moment over the center support can be computed as:
M sec ondary M resul tan t M primary
M sec 246 100 146 k ft
Example 2:
For the prestressed beam in Ex. 1, a uniform load of 1.2 k/ft is applied to the entire
length of the two spans (including weight of the beam itself). Locate the line of
pressure in the concrete due to the combined action of the prestress and external
load. Compute the stress in concrete section at B, I = 39,700 in4, Ac = 288 in2.
w = 1.2 k/ft
12
6
cgc-line
24
cgs-line
50
Concrete Section
FEM
-250
Dist +250
CO
____
0.00
50
+250
-250
+125
+375
-125
+375
-250
+250
____
0.00
+211
+211
M-diag.
Due to DL
-375
C-line
C-line.
Due to MDL
0.74
0.54
1.50
C-line
Resulting C-line.
due to combined MP+MDL
0.09
-.52
0.13
By dividing the moments by the prestress F, the shifting of the C-line can be
obtained due to MDL.
83
G.P.Ancog
F Mc
250 130 x12(18)
A
I
288
39700
0.867 0.707 0.160 ksi
fT
Bottom fiber:
F Mc
250 130 x12(18)
A
I
288
39700
0.867 0.707 1.574 ksi
fB
Note:
The prestress moments and the dead load moments can be combined together
and then make the moment distribution. The results would obviously be the same.
Linear Transformation and Concordancy of Cables
The design of continuous prestress beams is more complicated problem. In
analysis, the concrete section, the steel, and the location of the steel are already
known or assumed. It is only necessary to compute the stresses for the given loading
conditions. This is not true in design, which is essentially a trial-and-error process in an
effort to reach the best proportions. The designer must be well acquainted with the
method of analysis before he can perform efficiently in design. IN order to design well,
we must be conversant with some of the mechanics of continuous prestressed beams.
Linear Transformation
The designer should be able to perform linear transformation with ease and skill
and to obtain either concordant or nonconcordant cables to satisfy the most desirable
conditions.
When the position of cgs-line or of a C-line is moved over the interior supports of
a continuous beam without changing the intrinsic shape (i.e. the curvature and bends)
of the line within each individual span, the line is said to be linearly transformed.
Explanation:
1.
2.
3.
First, the position of the line is moved only over the interior supports
whenever desired, but not at the ends of beam.
Strictly speaking, a line can still be termed linearly transformed if it is
moved at the ends.
For purpose of design, linear transformation without involving movement
st the ends is much more useful.
84
G.P.Ancog
4.
BY linear transformation, the intrinsic shape of the line within each span
remains unchanged; only the amount of bending of the line over the
interior supports changed.
The C-line resulting from perstressing a continuous beam is linearly
transformed line from the cgs line.
5.
0.3
0.4
0.5
F = 200 k
0.8
0.2
1.0
1.0
0.2
25
50
50
50
80k
140k
20k
200
-40k
200
-60k
-160k
14.4 k
80 k-ft
0.64 k/ft
Theorem:
In a continuous beam, any cgs line can be linearly transformed without changing
the position of the resulting C-line.
This means that the linear transformation of cgs line does not affect the stresses
in the concrete, since the C-line remains unchanged. Thus the two cgs line in the
above figure will produce the same stresses in the concrete, despite their apparently
divergent locations.
Any bending of cgs over the support will produce transverse forces acting on the
beam which are directly counteracted by reactions from the supports. Hence the
loading will not affect the moment along the beam. Since the moment is not affected,
the C-line is not affected. Thus, linear transformation involving bending of the cgs line
over the interior supports will not change the location of the C-line. On the other hand,
85
G.P.Ancog
any movement of the cgs line at the ends of the beam changes the magnitude of the
applied end moment which do affect the moments on all spans. Hence, linear
transformation cannot involve the movement of the cgs line over the ends of the
beam or over the exterior support of a cantilever, but it can involve movement of the
cgs line over the interior supports.
The above theorem, permitting the linear transformation of the cgs line without
changing the C-line, offers many possible adjustments in the location of the cgs line
which cannot be easily accomplished without that knowledge.
Concordant Cable In Continuous Beam
Concordant cable in continuous beam is a cgs line which produces a C-line
coincident with the cgs line.
In other words, a concordant cable produces no secondary moment. Thus every
cable in a statically determinate structure is concordant, because no external reaction
is induced, and there is no secondary moment in the structure. For a continuous beam,
on the other hand, external reactions will usually be induced by prestressing. These
reactions will produce secondary moments in the beam, and the C-line will shift away
from the cgs line. When this happens, the cable is termed nonconcordant. When by
chance or by purpose, no reactions are induced in a continuous beam by prestressing,
then there will be no secondary moments and the cable is a concordant one.
When a concordant cable is prestressed, it will tend to produce no deflection of
the beam over the supports, and hence no reactions will be induced (not considering
the weight of the beam).
Besides the fact that concordant cable line is easier for analysis, there is seldom
a necessity for using a concordant one.
While no significant reason can be given for preferring a concordant cable, there
is even less justification for locating a nonconcordant cable for the sake of
nonconcordancy. The real choice of a good cgs location depends on the production of a
desirable C-line and the satisfaction of other practical requirements, but not on the
concordancy or nonconcordancy of the cable.. A concordant cable, being easier to
compute, is slightly preferred, other things being equal.
86
G.P.Ancog
R = 0 due to
prestress
R=0
R=0
R 0 due to
prestress
Secondary moment
R0
R0
87
G.P.Ancog
Example Beam:
48 k
1.60 k/ft
25
50
50
-363
19
7.26
5.82
3.63
2.91
1.
2.
G.P.Ancog
3.
4.
5.
6.
Corollaries
of
the
General
Theorem
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
G.P.Ancog
rib shortening should be additionally considered. For varying prestress along the
beam, the moment diagram should be divided by the corresponding prestress at
each point in order to obtain the location of a concordant cable. Or the tendons
may be treated separately. If each individual tendons or group of tendons forms
a concordant cable, then, when acting together, they also form a concordant
cable.
Example 4:
Obtain a new concordant cable, with its intrinsic shape the same as that of
Example 3-c), but with the right end of the cable 4 above the cgc.
19
9.50
7.26
5.82
Ex. 3-c)
0.25
0.375
1.00
0.095
19
a) Moment Diagram for Continuous Beam Due to Unit Moment at Right End
8.50
5.76
4
6.20
19
Solution:
1.
2.
Apply a unit moment at the right end of the beam; by moment distribution
method, plot the moment diagram as in a)
The concordant cable can now be linearly transformed in proportion to the
moment diagram in a), giving a new concordant cable as in b).
Note:
The same moment diagram in a) can be used to shift the end eccentricity any
other amount, not only for 4 as illustrated. Also, owing to the symmetry of the beam,
a) can be similarly used for moving the end eccentricity at the left. A combination of
90
G.P.Ancog
two moment diagrams due to a moment at each end will permit the simultaneous
shifting of both end eccentricities.
An infinite number of concordant cables can be obtained by rotating one
concordant cable about the points of inflection, because such rotation simply
represents the addition of one concordant cable to another, and should result in a
concordant one. The points of infliction in these moment diagram are sometimes
called nodal points.
Cable Location
Cable location means the location of the centroid of the tendons, that is the cgs
line. After the cgs line is determined, the location of the individual position of the
various tendons is an easier problem.
Designing a continuous prestressed-concrete beam, like that of any other
continuous structure, is essentially a procedure of trial and error. Knowledge regarding
the analysis of such structures, together with a systematic approach to the solution,
will aid greatly in arriving at desired results.
Recommended Steps for Designing a Continuous Prestressed Beam
1.
2.
3.
a min
M min
F
Mmin
also
aG
MG
Fo
where Mmin
moment. The distance amin and aG
should be plotted upward for M and downward for +M.
Top Fiber
Top Kern
aG
amax
aG
amin
91
Bottom
Fiber
Limiting Zone for C-line Due to Prestress
Bottom Kern
G.P.Ancog
a max
M max
F
also
aG
MG
Fo
5.
Select a trial cable location within the above zone. Note that, if the cable
follows the shape of some moment diagram, it will be a concordant cable.If
this location is a concordant cable, it is a satisfactory solution. If it is a
nonconcordant cable, the C-line can be determined by moment
distribution method. If the C-line still lies within the limiting zone, then the
two locations are possible: either the trial location giving a nonconcordant
cable, or a new location following the C-line. If this C-line lies outside the
zones, a new cable location can be tried. An attempt should be made to
get a concordant cable within the zone. It is generally best to try a
concordant cable, because they coincide with their C-lines and give a nore
direct solution.
The concordant cable within the limiting zone obtained in Step 4 is a good
location for resisting external moment, but it may or may not be a good
practical location
Example 5:
92
G.P.Ancog
1230000
132 k ,
9.33
Fo
F
132
156 k
1 0.15
Step 3:
Kern lines for a rectangular section are located h/3. the maximum and
minimum moment diagrams together with the girder moment diagram are shown for
one-half of the structure. These diagrams are divided by the respective prestress, F for
those with live loads, and Fo for dead load only. The a values thus obtained are plotted
from the kern lines as shown, giving the limits for the zone within which the C-line due
to prestressing must lie.
Step 4:
Using the moment diagrams as guides, select a trial cgs location within
the zone as shown. For purposes of illustration, assume the cgs line to posses the
following characteristics.
1.
2.
3.
4.
For the cgs location, the corresponding loading on the concrete is shown in d),
moment distribution for which gives a moment diagram as in e). Dividing the moment
diagram by the prestress yields a C-line as shown in f) which is very close to the trial
location and is still within the limiting zone. Hence this C-line is a location for a
satisfactory concordant cable.
Step 5:
A more practical location for the cgs is shown in g), affording a better
location for the steel. This is obtained by linearly transforming the concordant cable
93
G.P.Ancog
into a nonconcordant one. This nonconcordant cable will yield the same C-line as the
concordant one and hence will serve the same purpose as far as the stresses are
concerned.
40
60
a) Bridge Elevation
40
40
30
CL
9-4
13
LL on AB, CD
41.5 k-ft
LL on BC
29.3 k-ft
b) Bridge Section
DL only
DL only
CL
LL on AB, BC
43.6
46.7
53.9
58.4
DL only
LL on AB, CD
LL on BC
kt
cgc
4
kb
4.5
cgs
LL on AB, BC
DL only
15
CL
DF 0.69
FEM+32.2
d) Loading
Dist-32.2
CO
Dist
----------Total0.00
0.31
-19.3+62.4
-16.1
-18.6
- 8.4
-54.0l 54.0
54.0
31.3
39.6
4.90
2.85
3.60
f) C-line from e)
94
3.09
G.P.Ancog
4.25
4.25
g) Nonconcordant Cable
L1
L2
L3
a
)
L1
A
Pe
EI
B
95
G.P.Ancog
L1
L2
MSBA
b
)
L3
MSCB
MSBC
B
MSCD
C
Procedure:
1. Considere the spans cut at interior supports and each span is considered as a
simple beam on which moment, Pe, (primary moment) are imposed due to
prestress..
2. The slope of the end span at the first interior support due to prestressing may
then be calculated as:
AB
Pe(L1 ) x
EI
L1
3. Apply a moment on the end span at B (M SBA, the fixed-end secondary moment
at B) which will rotate the beam back to zero slope. For two span symmetrical
structure, this moment would be the secondary moment due to prestressing.
For three or more spans or unsymmetrical structures, it is necessary to
distribute the fixed-end secondary moments. Application of MSBA will result
in a triangular moment diagram over the end span and the rotation of the
support due to this moment diagram will be:
AB
M SBA L1
3EI
Equating rotations due to prestressing and due to secondary moment MSBA can be
obtained:
Pe(L1 ) x M SBA L1
EI
L1
3EI
M SBA
5.
6.
7.
3
L1
Pe(L x
1
G.P.Ancog
L
2
8.
9.
8P(eb ec)
L2
97
G.P.Ancog
wP
d
ds
1 dy
dx
R
d2y
dx 2
d2
P 2
dx
w
P
R
3
2
dy
dx
2
ds
d
3
2
4(eb e c ) 2
x ec 2P(1-1)eb
2
1 (1-)L2
L
The moment due to prestressing force P at a distance x from the origin:
e( x )
4( e b e c ) 2
x ec
2
L
M Pe( x) P
1)eb
Equivalent Load 2P(1for Continuous
Beam:
(1-)(1--1)L
eb
eb
MBA
1eb
Peb
Ptan
B
L
(1 - 1L
1L
End Span
End Span
98
G.P.Ancog
4P(1 2)eb
(1/2 2)L2
M BA
Peb
2
2
2 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
4
4P(1 2)eb
2L2
Eccentricity:
x = 0 to x = L:
( )eb 1
(L)
x2
2( 1 )eb
x e b
(L)
x = L to x = (1 1)L
e
(1 1 )eb
2 (1 1 )eb
2 (1 1 )eb
2
x
1eb
(1 )(1 1 ) L
(1 )(1 1 )
(1 )(1 1 ) L2
x = (1 1)L to x = L
Interior Span:
e
eb
eb
2eb
A
B
2L
( - 2)L
( - 2)L
2L
Interior Span
99
G.P.Ancog
M AB M BA
2 Peb
- 1)(1 1)eb
(1 2 )(1 4(222) +(12
- )4L2
3
Eccentricity:
x -
eb
eb
1eb
(1 )L
2P(1 )eb
L2
End Span
MBA
P
Peb
End Span
100
B
G.P.Ancog
M BA
Peb
5 2 1 (3 2 12 10) 4 (2 3)
20
Eccentricity:
x = 0 to x = L
( 1 ) e b 2 2( 1 ) e b
x
x eb
(L)
(L) 2
x = L to x = L
e
2 ( 2 4 2)(1 1 )eb
1 eb
(1 ) 4
e
eb
eb
2eb
A
B
L/2
L/2
Interior Span
MAB
MBA
P
A
Interior Span
101
G.P.Ancog
M AB M BA
8 Peb
(1 2 )
15
Eccentricity:
x
x
P e A (e B e A )
L
L
where:
MAB and MBA are the total prestressing moments at two adjacent supports
P is the tendon force
eA, eB & e are the eccentricities at A, B & x, respectively
Eccentricities are taken as negative when it falls below the cgc, and positive above
cgc.
(eB eA)x
L
eA
(eB eA)
eB
eA
(MBA MAB)x
L
MAB
MAB
(MBA - MAB)
MBA
G.P.Ancog
P M net c
A
I
Ptan
Load w
wp
cgc
cgs
e
L
Simple Beam
L2
L1
L3
Continuous Beam
While load balancing is an extremely powerful concept for visualizing the effect
of prestressing on the structure, there are some qualifications that should be kept in
mind when using the technique in final detailed designs.
1.
2.
3.
Element Type
1-way solid slab
2-way solid slabs, supported on columns only
103
Simple span
Roof
Floor
45
40
G.P.Ancog
40
35
42
35
30
38
35
30
38
30
26
35
These ratios maybe increased if calculations verify that deflection, camber, and
vibration frequency and amplitude are not objectionable.
3
b = 182
6
30
20
14
57-00
57-00
Section properties:
Ag
yt
yb
Ig
Zt
Zb
=
=
=
=
=
=
1512 in2
8.00 in
28.00 in
133000 in4
16630 in3
4752 in3
DL
-385.5
-804.3
+402.1
LL
-126.7
-264.4
+132.2
Total
-512.2
-804.3
-1068.7
+534.3
-264.4
-126.7
interior col
exterior col
+132.2
+402.1
57-0
104
G.P.Ancog
Post-tensioning
The effects of post-tensioning are treated separately from the effects of loads
and are dependent on the magnitude and position of the tendon force and on frame
action. Assume two-end stressing. A tendon profile is selected:
28
3
L/12
= 4.75
(11/12)(57)=52.25
Secondary Moments
Secondary moments induced by post-tensioning are accounted for by
considering the effects of restrained rotations. For simplicity, a post-tensioning force of
1
2
1 kip is used.
b
a
52.25
4.75
Mp = Pe; P = 1 kip
a = (28 3) x 1 = 25 k-in
b = (8 4) x 1 = 4 k-in
G.P.Ancog
2 52.25 2
2
5
x
x 25 x 4.75 x 4 x 52.25 ( 4.75) 386.9
2
3
8
EI 2
2 2 1 555.7
19.50 k in
28.5
FEM @ 1: = L 2
1 2 2 302.5
10.61 k in
28.5
FEM @ 2: = L 2
Moments (per kip of force)
By moment distribution, moments at exterior columns are +11.31 k-in, at
interior column, + 14.71 k-in, and at mid-span, + 13.01 k-in. These secondary
moments can be considered to be:
M S P(e)
So the resulting e values, in this example, are 11.31, at columns 1 & 3, 14.71 at
column 2, and 13.01 at mid-span.
Required Post-Tensioning Force:
Allow a tensile stress of: f =
I
4752
f ' Z b 424
167.9 k ft
cb
12(1000)
I
16630
f ' Z t 424
587.6 k ft
ct
12(1000)
106
G.P.Ancog
40.6 k
Zt
16630
0 11.31
e e
1512
Ag
194.3 k
Zt
16630
4 14.71
e e
1512
Ag
290.5 k
Zb
4752
25 13.01
e e
1512
Ag
max
35,000
20,000
25,000
This Table of approximate pretsress losses were developed to provide common Post-Tensioning Industry
basis for determining tendon requirements on projects in which the magnitude of prestress losses is not
specified by the designer. These loss values were based on the use of normal weight concrete and on
average values of concrete strength, prestress lebvel, and exposure conditions. Actual values of losses
may vary significantly above or below the Table values in cases where the concrete is stressed at low
strengths, where the concrete is highly prestressed, or in a very dry or very weight exposure conditions.
The table values do not include losses due to friction.
Friction Losses
1
= 0.20, K = 0.001
4
25
107
28.5
28.5
G.P.Ancog
2e
L 2
tan 1
2(25 / 12)
.145 radians
28.5
1 tan 1
2(29 / 12)
.170 radians
28.5
2 tan 1
For mid-span:
1 = 0.20(.145) = 0.0290
KL = 0.001(28.5) = 0.0285
0.0575
Po Px e ( KL 1 ) Px e ( 0.0575) 1.059 Px
0.8 f pu
Po / Px
0.8 f pu
1.059
0.755 f pu 0.7 f pu
, so use 0.7fpu.
= 0.0962
= 0.0570
0.1532
108
G.P.Ancog
Po Px e ( KL 1 ) Px e ( 0.1532) 1.166 Px
0.8 f pu
Po / Px
0.8 f pu
1.166
P
290.5
41.37,
f e ( Ao ) 143(0.0491)
use 42 dia. wires.
, ok!
Mu
wu
4808
MT
(512.2) 755 k ft
w
3262
At support 2:
Mu
wu
4808
MT
(1068.7) 1575 k ft
w
3262
109
G.P.Ancog
At mid-span:
Mu
wu
4808
MT
(534.3) 788 k ft
w
3262
As NAo 42(0.0491)
0.00526
bd
bd
14(28)
f pu
1
240
f s f pu 1 (
) 240 1 .5(0.00526)
209.7 ksi
2
fc '
5
f s
209.7
(0.00526)
0.221 0.3 max .
fc '
5
At mid-span:
As NAo 42(0.0491)
0.000343
bd
bd
182(33)
f pu
1
240
f s f pu 1 (
) 240 1 .5(0.000343)
238.0 ksi
2
fc '
5
f s
238.0
(0.000343)
0.016 0.3 max .
fc '
5
As NAo 42(0.0491)
0.00460
bd
bd
14(32)
f pu
1
240
f s f pu 1 (
) 240 1 .5(0.00460)
213.5 ksi
2
fc '
5
f s
213.5
(0.00460)
0.196 0.3 max .
fc '
5
Mu provided = 934.0 k-ft < Mu required = 1575 k-ft, so add Grade 60 rebars.
110
G.P.Ancog
L M u @ 2 M umidspan
(1575 755)
4.808(28.5)
137.0 14.4 151.4 k
2
L
57
2
Approx. moment reduction: M = 3 Vu(a); a = (col. size) = (20) = 10 in.
2
10
M (151.4) 84.0 k ft
3
12
Moment at face of column: Mu = 1575 84 = 1491 k-ft
Vu wu
M u M uprovided
f y d
fy
fc '
(1491 934)(12)
3.87 in 2
0.9(60)(32)
3.87 60
Asb f y
.103
bd f c ' 14(32) 5
Fiber Stress:
Top fiber stress:
ft
P P(e e) M T
A
Z
Z
P P(e e) M T
A
Zt
Zt
1512
16630
16630
0.195 0.201 0.369 0.027 ksi, compressio n
111
G.P.Ancog
fb
P P (e e) M T
A
Zb
Zb
1512
4752
4752
0.195 0.702 1.293 0.786 ksi, compressio n
At mid-span:
Fiber stress:
P P(e e) M T
A
Z
Z
P P ( e e ) M T
A
Zt
Zt
1512
16630
16630
0.195 0.213 0.385 0.367 ksi, compressio n
P P (e e) M T
A
Zb
Zb
1512
4752
4752
0.195 0.744 1.348 0.409 ksi, tension
Fiber Stress:
P P(e e) M T
A
Z
Z
G.P.Ancog
ft
P P (e e) M T
A
Zt
Zt
1512
16630
16630
0.190 0.324 0.771 0.257 ksi, tension
P P(e e) M T
A
Zb
Zb
1512
4752
4752
0.190 1.134 2.699 1.755 ksi, compressio n
1755 psi f c 0.45 f c ' .45(5000) 2250 psi , ok
These stresses computed are all within allowable limits. Repeat stress check for
initial prestress force of 0.80fpu, allowable stress for compression fc = 0.6fc, and
f '
tension f = 3 c .
To complete the design, check mid-span deflection and design the shear
reinforcements.
10
cols. 16 x 16
22-00 transverse
design strip
10
3 bays @ 22-00
Loading:
Superimposed dead load (partition)
Live load
20 psf
40 psf
113
G.P.Ancog
Materials:
Concrete (normal weight)
Compressive strength, fc
150 pcf
4000 psi
Prestressing steel:
Use dia. strand unbonded, fpu
270 ksi
60 ksi
L 22(12)
6.6 in
40
40
use 6.5" slab.
t
Live load:
22
0.88 klf
1000
3
3
3.25 3.25
1.25
0.0
-2.0
+2.0
-1.0
+2.0
-2.0
0.0
Tendon Profile
114
G.P.Ancog
With equal length spans, simple beam moments are identical for all spans,
therefore set total drape (net vertical profile distance) of the tendons the same for
each span as shown in the tendon profile.
Since the tendon is anchored at slab mid-depth, the end span sets the max. midspan drape as the sum of the negative eccentricity and the average positive
eccentricity:
Mid-span drape = 2 + (2 + 0)/2 = 3
Mid-span eccentricity of 1 is then calculated for the interior span to give equal
total drape in all spans.
For unequal span frames, the tendon eccentricity is usually set at the maximum
allowed over each support to get maximum ultimate strength capacity.
Select balancing prestress force:
Balance total dead load: 1.79 + 0.44 = 2.23 klf
Pe'
wb L2
, where P prestress force after all losses , e' total drape
8
wb L8
simple span oment
8
wb L2 2.23(22) 2 (12)
P
fc
Po M ub
A
Z
G.P.Ancog
P = 540 k
fc
P 540 x1000
-29.9
20.9
15.9
-29.9
-42.0
-37.1
-37.1 -42.0
Unbalanced Moments
P M ub 540(1000) 42.0(12)(1000)
A
Z
1716
22 x12(6.5) 2 / 6
Since the overbalanced initial loading (0.81 klf) is less than the unbalanced service
Po
P
loading (0.88 klf), and A is greater than A , it is apparent that the slab has no tensile
stresses at initial loading.
Comparison of idealized design with more rigorous analysis.
Since tendons cannot be placed with sharp peaks of tendon profile, the actual
tendon profile produces load reversals as it changes from concave upward to concave
downward, and resultant moments change accordingly. Using equivalent loading and
tendon infliction points at 1/15 of span lengths and from structural analysis (moment
distribution, computer program, etc.), the following results are:
116
G.P.Ancog
Ext. Col.
Mid-span
-27.4
-18.8
Check stresses at max. moment:
fc
Int. Col.
-51.5
Mid-span
-9.9
P M ub
51.5
315
(271) 17 psi , tension
A
Z
42.0
Int. col
-100.7
-38.4
-206.3
-231.2
Mid-span
+42.7
+17.4
+89.4
+180.6
P
540
3.33 in 2
f se 162
At interior column:
d = 6.5 1.25 = 5.25 in
A ps
3.33
0.0024
bd (22 x12)(5.25)
f '
4
f s f se 10 c 162 10
189 ksi
100
100(0.0024)
, (specs)
f s
189
0.0024
0.113 0.30, ok
fc '
4
A ps f s
.85 f c ' b
3.33(189)
0.70 in
.85(4)( 22 x12)
G.P.Ancog
For 22 x 22 panel:
VDL = 1.4(2.23 klf)(22) = 68.7 k
VLL = 1.7(0.88 klf)(22) = 32.9 k
Vu
= 101.6 k
For a 16 x 16 cols., bo = 4(b + d) = 4(16 + 5.25) = 85 in.
v 4.2 f c ' 4.2 4000 265.63 psi
Concrete shear capacity: uc
Actual shear stress:
V
101.6 x1000
vu u
267.85 265.63
bo d .85(85)(5.25)
taken ok.
Although the value obtained is somewhat higher, empirical equations developed
from the following tests indicate adequate punching shear capacity.
Lin-Scordelis-May Tests:
Vu (0.175 0.0000242 f c '0.00002 P / S )bdf c '
P = 540 k, S = 22 x 12, b = 4(16) = 64 in., d = 5.25 in.
Vu [0.175 2.42 x10 5 (4000) 2.0 x10 5 (540 x10 3 /( 22 x12))]( 64)(5.25)( 4.0) 161.0 k
> 101.6 k
Grow-Vanderbilt Tests:
Vu = (360 +0.30fc)bd = [360 + 0.3(315)](64)(5.25)/1000 = 153.00 k > 101.6 k
Minimum bonded reinforcements:
From ACI Code, when tension exists in the precompressed tensile zone at a load
of DL + 1.2LL, a minimum amount of bonded reinforcement is required. At interior
column, the moment at DL + 1.2LL = 100.7 + 1.2(38.4) = 147.0 k-ft:
P M s ( M DL 1.2 M LL )
A
Z
Z
P = 540 k, A = 1716 in2, Z = 1859 in3 , Ms = 87.6 k-ft ( from moment
distribution)
fc
Top fiber:
0.069 ksi
1716
1859
1859
fc
-0.069
0.699 ksi
1716
1859
1859
0.58
Bottom fiber:
fc
6.5
118
+0.699
G.P.Ancog
Tension in concrete:
1
1
f ' cb (. 069)(0.58)( 22 x12) 5.28 k
2
2
As f s Tc
Tc
As
Tc
5.28
0.18 in 2
0.5 f y 0.5(60)
2.
3.
(n-1)As
P
Section at A-A
119
Prestressed Concrete Tension Member.
Transformed
Section
G.P.Ancog
Initial prestress:
f co
Fo
Ac
Effective prestress:
fc
F
Ac
Transformed section:
At nAs Ac unbonded section
At Ag (n 1) As
grouted section
Stress produce by P:
fc
P
At for concrete
f s nf c
nP
At for steel
Es
E c consider the effect of creep & shrinkage
Resultant stress (due to effective prestress plus external load):
n
fc
F
P
Ac At for concrete
fs fc
nP
At for steel
A
F
P
0 ; P F t F (1 n )
Ac At
Ac
120
G.P.Ancog
Fo
EAc
P
EAt
fs
20000
0.00067
E s 30 x10 6
fc from 1,000 psi to 0, Ec = 4x106 psi
Given:
fc
1000
0.00025
E c 4 x10 6
fse = 125,000 psi, Es = 30x106 psi
Given:
f se 125000
0.00417
E s 30 x10 6
, which 6 times that of structural steel and 16
times that of prestress concrete.
G.P.Ancog
Solution:
a)
b)
30 x10 6 0.80
) 110,000 lbs
4 x10 6 80
Fo L 150000(0.80)(150 x12)
0.675 in.
E c Ac
4 x10 6 (80)
f se
127500
0.675
0.573 in.
fo
150000
If creep is considered:
c)
30 x10 6
At Ac nAs 80
(0.80) 86 in 2
6
4 x10
Under the external load of 110,000 lbs:
:
d)
closely
check
the
shortening
of
concrete in b).
For a structural steel stressed to 20,500 psi, the elongation is:
s
e)
PL
110000(150 x12)
0.575 in.
E c At
4 x10 6 (86)
,
f s L 20000(150 x12)
1.20 in.
Es
30 x10 6
f se L 127500(150 x12)
7.65 in.
Es
30 x10 6
122
G.P.Ancog
Example 2:
For the tension member in Example 1, what working load can it carry using a
factor of safety of 2.0 against the cracking of concrete, assuming the direct tensile
strength of concrete to be 0.08f c = 320 psi? Compute the residual compression in
concrete under the working load.
Solution:
For fc = 320 psi: F = fseAs = 127500(0.80) = 102000 lbs, Ac = 80 in2, At = 86 in2:
F
P
102000 P
320;
Ac At
80
86
P 137,000 lbs , which is the cracking load .
Pcracking
FS
137000
68,500 lbs
2 .0
F
P 102000 68500
Circular Prestressing
Fo
C = Fo
C = Fo Fo
T=q
Due to prestress, Fo
Due
Due to circular prestress, the stress in concrete is always axial an equal to:
f co
Fo
Ac , at transfer
123
G.P.Ancog
fc
F
Ac , at final stage of loading after all losses.
qR
; At Ac (n 1) As
At
The resultant prestress in the concrete under the effective prestress F and the internal
pressure q:
fc
F qR
Ac
At
In order to be exact, the value of n has to be chosen correctly, considering the level of
stress and the effect of creep.
The criteria for designing prestressed tanks vary. The usual practice is to provide
a slight residual compression in the concrete under the working pressure. This is
accomplished as follows:
1.
qR
f s , the total initial prestress is then, Fo As f so
Fo
f c , from the value of the required A , the thickness t of tank can be
c
obtained.
Ac
2.
Corresponding to the adopted value of A c, the stress in the concrete and steel
under internal pressure q can be obtained as:
F qR
fc
fs f
Since the serviceability of the tank is impaired as soon as the concrete begins to
crack, it is of utmost importance that adequate factor of safety be provided against
124
G.P.Ancog
2.
F mqR
Ac
At
Fo
f c , and
f A f
mqR
f t se s c
f o As
( f o As f c ) nAs
Ac
3.
mqR
[ f se ( f t / f c ) f o ](1 nf c / f o )
4.
5.
Fo
A f
s o
fc
fc
Stresses can be evaluated using the following equations:
Ac
F qR
fc
fs f
G.P.Ancog
Solution:
Pressure of 20 ft of water:
q h 62.4(20) 1248 psf
qR 1248(30)
0.312 in 2
f se
120000
F0 (0.312 x150000)
62.5 in 2
fc
750
For a height of 12 , the thickness required is:
Ac
Ac 62.5
fc
F qR
fc
26 psi
66
69.12
126
G.P.Ancog
As
mqR
[ f se ( f t / f c ) f o ](1 nf c / f o )
1.25(1248)(30)
0.372 in 2
[120000 (0 /( 750))(150000)](1 10( 750) / 150000)
Fo
0.372(150000)
74.4 in 2
fc
750
Thickness required:
Ac
Ac 74.4
6.2 in.
b
12
, adopt t = 6.5 in.
F qR
.372(120000) 1248(30)
115 psi
Ac At
78
81.72
Note: By designing by the second method, gives heavier sections for both concrete and steel.
The design can be economized if some tension in the concrete is allowed at 25% overload.
load carried by
vertical element
load carried by
ring tension
HR
0.0
Vertical Section
of Tank Wall
and Deflection
under Load
0.1
0.2
K=1.6
K=0.8
K=0.4
0.3
0.7
K=12.0
0.6
2R
0.5
Moment in
Vertical Element
K=3.0
Height, H
0.4
Load Distribution
between Horizontal
t
& Vertical Elements
0.8
0.9
1.0
.0
.1 .2
.3 .4
.5 .6 .7
Coefficient, C
Fixed Base, Free Top
.8
.9 1.0
127
K=
H2
2Rt
G.P.Ancog
0.0
0.1
0.2
2R
0.3
0.8
0.9
K=12.0
0.7
K=6.0
K=0.8
0.6
K=3.0
0.5
K=1.6
K=0.4
Height, H
0.4
1.0
.0
.1 .2
.3 .4
.5 .6 .7
.8
.9 1.0
Coefficient, C
Hinged Base, Free Top
K=
H2
2Rt
Horizontal elements of the tank wall are subjected to hoop tension and the
vertical elements are subjected to bending. The variation of bending in the vertical
elements will depend on several factors.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The condition of support at the bottom of the wall, whether fixed, hinged, free
to slide, or restrained by friction.
The condition of support at the top of the wall, whether fully or partially
restrained or free to move.
The variation of concrete thickness along the height of the wall.
The variation of pressure along the depth, whether triangular or trapezoidal.
The ratio of the height of tank to its diameter.
G.P.Ancog
8
20
inside of tank
A
12
cgs
2.75
Section A-A
Solution:
129
G.P.Ancog
Initial
Fiber
Inside
-225
-184
Final
Outsid
e
Insid
e
Outsid
e
-16
-21
-16
-21
-16
-21
-83
-83
-78
+78
+23
4
+36
-234
-276
-225
198
+225
-51
-115
+107
-300
-345
+225
-120
Slight tension of 36 to 41 psi exists on the inside vertical fibers when the tank is
empty. Otherwise, compressive stresses are obtained throughout.
Dome Ring Prestressing
Dome prestressing wires
and prestress temporary
erection bars
Dome shell
Pneumatic mortar
Reservoir wall
130
Typical Section of Dome Ring for Tanks
G.P.Ancog
The dome roof itself is made of concrete or pneumatic mortar with thickness
varying from 2 to 6. For domes of large diameter, variable thickness may be
employed and thickness greater than 6 are used for the lower portion. Before
concreting the dome, some erection bars are prestressed around the base of the
dome. After the hardening of the shell concrete, wires are prestressed around it.
During this operation, the dome shell rises from its forms as it is compressed, thus
simplifying the careful procedure for decentering required for non-prestressed domes.
Methods and formulas, though available for the analysis of dome stresses under
uniform loads, are applicable only to points on the domes removed from the
discontinuous edge. The computation of stresses in the edge ring becomes very
complicated problem if the edge ring is prestressed. However, for purposes of design,
a conventional method is available. It consists of prestressing the ring to induce
sufficient compressive stresses to counteractTotal
the
tensile
dome
load W stresses set up in the ring
under the maximum live and dead loads. With this prestress, it is usually possible to
raise the dome from its falsework, since only the dead load is actually acting on the
dome.
Spherical dome
131
G.P.Ancog
H V cot
W cot
2R sin
W
cot
2
Fo
fc
R = radius of dome
W = total vertical load on the dome
Fo = initial prestressing force, fc = allowable compressive stress in concrete.
Ac
It is desirable to keep fc at a relatively low value, say 0.2fc and not greater than
800 psi. This is necessary in order to minimize excessive strain in the edge ring which
might in turn produce high stresses in the shell. It must be further observed that this
procedure of design is satisfactory only when there is no possibility of heavy
overloads, because the prestressed edge ring does not posses a high factor of safety
against overloads, although the factor of safety is sufficient for ordinary roof loading.
Example 5: Prestress Dome Ring
A spherical dome as shown the figure, carries a total live and dead load of 900k.
Design the prestress in the edge ring and the cross-sectional area of the concrete
required for the edge ring. Loss of prestress = 20%, fc = 600 psi.
Total W = 900k
spherical dome
120 ft
45o
Required prestress:
132
G.P.Ancog
W
900
cot
cot 45 o 143 k
2
2
F
143
179 k
(1 .2) .80
Ac
Fo 143x1000
298 in 2
fc
600
P
A
A
F
F Concrete as freebody
A
A
F
F
A
Balancing Action of Concrete and Steel133
Steel as freebody
G.P.Ancog
C
Before Bending
Section C-C
C
After Bending
Section C-C
If steel and concrete are not in direct contact along the entire length, the
problem will be different. The concrete under compression will have a tendency to
deflect laterally. That deflection will not at first bring the steel to deflect together with
it; hence the eccentricity of prestress on the concrete is actually changed, thus
resulting a column action. After a certain amount of deflection, the steel is brought
134
G.P.Ancog
into contact with the concrete and the two will begin to deflect together. Hence the
column action is limited to the differential deflection of the two materials.
If the steel is in contact with the concrete at several points, say at E and F, but
not along the entire length, the column action is limited to the length between the
points of contact. If such length is short, column action will not be serious.
Curve Members
Eccentric Prestress
And Column Action
Bent Members Under
Concentric Prestress
G.P.Ancog
F Fec P Mc
A
Ic
At
It
G.P.Ancog
16
2 to center of steel
2 to center of steel
16
Column Section
is 100,000
80
8 kk
Column
Solution:
Stress in concrete due to prestress:
F (8 x0.11)( 100,000)
344 psi
Ac
(16 x16 8 x 0.11)
Stress due to axial load P = 80 k, disregarding deflection of column:
P
P
80,000
80,000
306 psi
At Ag (n 1) As 16 x16 (7 1)8 x0.11
261
The maximum bending moment occurs at midheight:
M
PL 8(18)
36 k ft
4
4
bh 3
16 4
2(n 1) As i x 2
2(7 1)(3 x0.11)(6) 2 5460 142 5602 in 4
12
12
616 psi
It
5602
137
G.P.Ancog
0.075 in.
48 E c I t
48(4 x10 6 )(5602)
Increase in moment due to axial load:
M P (80 x1000)(0.075) 6000 in lb (0.50 k ft)
Very small to materially affect the column stresses, and may be neglected. The
maximum compressive stress of 1266 psi would appear to be high for a reinforcedconcrete column but is not excessive for a prestressed member which more a beam
than a column in this example.
The safety of the column can be determined only if we know the ultimate
strength of the column under such combined axial and transverse loads and also if we
know the possibilities of overloading, that is, to what extent the axial or the horizontal
loads may be increased, and whether eccentricity of the applied axial load may be
possible.
For the purpose of investigation, let us assume that both the horizontal and the
axial load are increased by 50% while, in addition, there will be an eccentricity of 2 in.
for the axial load. The stresses can be computed:
Stress due to axial load:
1.5(-306) = - 459 psi
Moment due to eccentricity: M = 1.5(80)(2) = 240 k-in (20 k-ft)
20
616( ) 342 psi
36
Stress due to eccentricity:
Stress due to horizontal load:
1.5( 616) 924 psi
Resulting stresses:
f max 344 459 342 924 2069 psi
f min 344 459 342 924 463 psi
Remark:
The maximum compressive stress of 2069 psi is only about 0.52f c, while the
tensile stress is below the modulus of rupture of about 0.12f c, hence the column
138
G.P.Ancog
would not have cracked, and the midheight deflection can still be computed by the
elastic theory not to be more than 0.2 in., which is not a significant value. Thus it can
be concluded that the column is safe.
Investigating the handling stresses:
Assume the column is picked up at the midheight:
Resulting moment:
2
wc L2 Ag c L
[16 x16(150) / 144](9) 2
M
10.8 k ft
2
2
2
Since the maximum tensile stress during handling, + 185 psi is much less than
the precompression stress of 344 psi, the column is safe during handling.
Column Under Eccentric Load
Precast bearing walls and columns can be prestressed to improve their elastic
behavior and handling characteristics, and to increase their resistance to lateral forces
both in the elastic and the ultimate ranges. They cannot be designed following rules of
thumb applied to reinforced concrete walls and columns. But they can be designed on
P and properties of materials. The behavior and
the basis of principles of mechanics
e
strength of prestressed columns under eccentric loading can be predicted with fair
precision. The degree of accuracy will depend on the choice of values of modulus of
elasticity, the modulus of rupture, and the compressive strength of the concrete.
Before cracking, the stresses and deflections can be calculated assuming the column
to behave elastically. The stress at any section is the sum of the stresses due to
prestress, direct axial load, moment due to the eccentricity, and the moment due to
the deflection.
P
Column under
eccentric load
139
G.P.Ancog
Column stresses:
f max
min
F
P Pec Pc
At At
It
It
where:
F = effective total pretress including all losses except elastic shortening of
concrete due to superimposed load.
P = superimposed load.
e = eccentricity of load from the centroid of section.
c = distance to the extreme fiber from the centroid of the section
At = area of transformed section
It = moment of inertia of the transformed section
= deflection of column at the section.
Critical stress occur at the midheight of the column, where the deflection of the
column is given by the well-known secant formula:
PL2
e sec
1
4Ec I t
By the elastic theory, cracking can be assumed to occur when the fiber stress
reaches the modulus of rupture. Beyond cracking, the elastic theory is no longer
accurate. An estimation of the ultimate load can be made by the elastic theory,
assuming it to be the load at which the extreme fiber stress reaches the compressive
strength of concrete. Since such an approximate analysis can be way off (by perhaps
some 10% even for ordinary cases), it is desirable to apply plastic analysis, taking into
140
G.P.Ancog
1.5
account the cracking of concrete under tension, the plasticity of concrete under
As: 6 - 3/8 strands
compression, and the plasticity of steel. Furthermore, while the elastic analysis
mentioned above will generally err on the conservative side, it is conceivable that,
Section A-A
under unusual conditions, erratic conclusions could be reached unless plastic analysis
is applied.
Elevation
Solution:
a) Compute properties of the section:
n
E s 30 x10 6
7.5
Ec
4 x10 6
12 x83
2(7.5 1)(3 x.08)( 2.5 2 ) 512 19 531 in 2
12
b) Compute deflection of the column at midheight by the secant formula for several
values of P, say P = 50, 100, 120, 140, and 160 k. Numerical computation is given
for P = 120 k.
141
G.P.Ancog
PL2
120 x10 3 (249) 2
e sec
1 1.5 sec
1
6
4
E
I
4
(
4
x
10
)(
531
)
c t
At At
It
It
min
F = Asfse = (6x.08)(150,000)x10-3 = 72 k, assuming it is not reduced by the
presence of P, and using P = 120 k, D = 1.03 in:
f max
99
99
531
531
728 1210 1355 930
4223 psi
f max
min
f max
Due to P - Pe
200
Resulting tensile stress
Due to P
Due to P + Pe
160
140
fc = 5,700 psi
-7000 -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000
120
100
Due to P
180
1000
2000
80
Deflection at midheight
of column
60
40
20
3000
Deflection, inches
142
G.P.Ancog
M
t
2
t
2
Steel
Column
s1
c s2
Strain at
Section
T2
T1
CL of column
Stress block
in concrete
fc
Fv 0 : P C T1 T2
M 0 : (T1 T2 )
yc
yt
Cyc
2
By assuming a location for the neutral axis at ultimate load, setting c as the
ultimate strain in concrete and fc as the ultimate stress of concrete, and by assigning
ultimate stress distribution curves for concrete, it is possible to compute the
combination of P and M that results in this ultimate failure.
For slender columns, the value of M just computed should include the effect of
deflection, which can be computed by numerical procedure provided the load-moment
curvature relationship of the column section is known.
Example 3: Ultimate column load
For the column section shown in example 2, if the ultimate neutral axis were
located at 3 in. from one edge, compute the combined P and M producing that failure.
143
G.P.Ancog
Solution:
Assume c = 0.003, by proportion, changes strains for the steel are:
P
M
t
2
5
2.5
t
2
Steel
Column
3
2.5
s1
c s2
Strain at
Section
T2
CL of column
T1
Stress block
in concrete
.85fc
yc
6
C
a
3.5
3.5
c
(0.003) 0.0021
5
5
1.5
1.5
c
(0.003) 0.0009
5
5
s1
s2
144
G.P.Ancog
C .85 f c ' b(
ac
35
) .85(5700)(12)(
) x10 3 232 k
2
2
y c 1.96 in
P C T1 T2 232 42.5 20.8 169 k
t
Cyc (42.5 20.8)( 2.5) 232(1.96) 508.97 k in
2
M 508.97
e
3.0116 in
P
169
M (T1 T2 )
which indicate that a load of 169 k with a total eccentricity of 3.0116 in. (including
column deflection if any) will produce failure in the column, when the ultimate neutral
axis is assumed located at 3 in. from the edge.
Cross section
can
Elevation
be
drawn
se s
Mu
Pu
P
M
Strain
*tdistribution
M
se
uc
0.85fc
0.85fc
Ts
s
Ts
Ts
1
o2
3
cu
se + s
Cross Section
b
Elevation
Strain Variation
Jensen
Idealization
Ts
Hognestad
Idealization
145
G.P.Ancog
Pu
Mu
The top branch of the interaction diagram shown above between points 1 and 2 was
obtained from the strain-distribution planes bound by planes 1 and 2. The top branch
is characterized by failures due to large axial loads and small bending moments. The
rest of the interaction diagram, between points 2 and 3, may be obtained by satisfying
the criterion that failure of the section occurs when the crushing strain uc is attained
at the extreme fiber, between limits set by planes 2 and 3. The later corresponds to
failure of the section due to bending moment alone, such as in the conventional case
of a beam section, and cannot be predicted a priori. It can be obtained by considering
the column as pure beam action, no axial load.
Example 4:
146
G.P.Ancog
Plane 1:
10
16
Plan
8 strand
As = As = 0.575
se = 0.005
fc = 6 ksi
Stresses in steel:
fs = fs = s Es = 0.003(30x103) = 90 ksi
Forces:
C = k3fcbt = 5.1(16x10) = 816 k
Ts = Ts = Asfs = 0.575(90) = 51.8 k
Strain
Strains in steel:
es = es = eo = 0.002
s = s = se = s = 0.005 0.002 = 0.003
o = 0.002
Pu
Vertical equilibrium:
Pu = C Ts Ts = 712 k
Mu = 0
k3fc = .85(6)
= 5.1 ksi
Stresses
Ts C
Ts
147
G.P.Ancog
Plane 2:
10
16
8 strand
As = As = 0.575
se = 0.005
fc = 6 ksi
Plan
Strain
s oc = 0.003
c = 10
Pu
Stresses
k1k3fc = (.75)(.85)(6)
= 3.8 ksi
Ts
Strains in steel:
es = uc(d/c) = 0.003(8/10) = 0.0024
s = se s = 0.005 0.0024 = 0.0026
es = euc(d/c) = 0.003(2/10) = 0.0006
s = se - s = 0.005 0.0006 = 0.0044
Stresses in steel:
fs = s Es = 0.0026(30x103) = 78 ksi
fs = sEs = 0.0044(30x103) = 132 ksi
Forces:
C = k1k3fcbt = 3.8(16x10) = 608 k
Ts = As fs = 0.575(132) = 76 k
Ts = Asfs = 0.575(78) = 45 k
Vertical equilibrium:
Pu = C Ts Ts = 487 k
Mu = C(t/2 k2c) + Ts(t/2 d) Ts(t/2 d)
Mu = 608(5 - .42x10) + 76(5 2) 45(5 2)
Mu = 580 k-in
C Ts
10
16
Plan
8 strand
As = As = 0.575
se = 0.005
fc = 6 ksi
Plane 3:
2
Strain
oc = 0.003
Mu
Stresses
C
Ts
k1k3fc = (.75)(.85)(6)
= 3.8 ksi
Strains in steel:
es = uc[(c-d)/c] = 0.003[(c 2)/c
s = se s = 0.005 0.003[(c 2)/c]
es = euc[(d c)/c] = 0.003[(8 c)/c]
s = se + s = 0.005 0.003[(8 c/c]
Stresses in steel:
fs = s Es = (30x103){0.005 0.003[(c 2)/c]}
fs = 150 90[(c 2)/c]
fs = sEs = (30x103){.005 + 0.003[(8 c)/c]} = fsu
Forces:
C = k1k3fcbc = 3.8(16c)
Ts = As fs = 0.575fs
Ts = Asfs = 0.575fs
Determination of c:
Fv = 0: = C Ts Ts = 487 k
0 = 3.8(16c) 0.575(150 90[(c 2)/c] - 0.575fs
Assume c = 3 in., then fs = fsu = 208 ksi and substituting:
Ts
G.P.Ancog
10
16
8 strand
As = As = 0.575
se = 0.005
fc = 6 ksi
900
se = 0
800
700
se = 0.005
Axial load P, k
600
200
400
600
800
1000 2000
The interaction diagram when the initial strain se = 0 is shown. The section
behaves like a conventional like a conventional reinforced concrete except that it is
reinforced with high-strength steel which lacks a definite yield point. This account for a
flat curvature of the diagram, as shown above, and for the absence of a sharp
balanced point, a definite characteristic of the interaction diagram of conventionally
reinforced concrete sections. The initial prestrain in the steel reduces the capacity of
the section to resist external load. This, of course, is due to the section of the internal
compression force imposed by the prestressing steel on the concrete.
Zero Tensile Strain column Interaction diagram
The stress block in the concrete is not fully developed when the maximum strain
in the section is smaller than uc. From the Hognestad Stress-strain diagram:
149
G.P.Ancog
C (0.85 f c ' bt )
Mc
4
o
1 4
3 o
1
1 4
(0.85 f c ' bt 2 4 1
6
o
2 o
where all symbols have been defined as before with the exception of 4 which is the
strain in the concrete at the near end fiber. The preceding expressions are valid for the
range 0 4 o when the strain in the concrete at the far end is zero.
P
M
Elevation
Strain
distribution
uc
4
Systematic determination of the zero tensile-strain interaction diagram using various strain distribution.
10
Plan
16
Plane 4:
8
strand
As = As
= 0.575
se = 0.005
fc = 6 ksi
2
Strain
s 4 = 0.0015
c = 10
e
Stresses
Ts
C Ts
Pu
Strains in steel:
es = 4(d/c) = 0.0015(8/10) = 0.0012
s = se s = 0.005 0.0012 = 0.0038
es = e4(d/c) = 0.0015(2/10) = 0.0003
s = se - s = 0.005 0.0003 = 0.0047
Stresses in steel:
fs = s Es = 0.0038(30x103) = 114 ksi
fs = sEs = 0.0047(30x103) = 141 ksi
Forces:
C = .85fcbt(e4/eo)(1 1/3(e4/eo)
= .85(6)(16)(10)(.0015/.002)(1 1/3(.0015/.002)
= 459 k
Ts = As fs = 0.575(114) = 65.6 k
Ts = Asfs = 0.575(141) = 81.1 k
Vertical equilibrium:
P = C Ts Ts = 312 k
M = (1/6)Ct(1 (4/o))/(1 1/3(4/o)) + Ts(h/2 d)
Ts(h/2 d)
M = 459(10/6)(1 (.0015/.002))/(1 1/3(.0015/.002)
+ 65.6(5 2) 81.1(5 2)
= 638 + 243 197 = 684 k-in
150
G.P.Ancog
G.P.Ancog
Joint standard set up by AASHTO and the Prestressed Concrete Institute state
that the maximum compressive stress fpc on prstressed concrete piles (in addition to
the effective prestress) for fc = 5,000 psi shall not exceed the following:
fpc = 1000 psi
fpc = 1160 16L/D
where
L = effective length of pile, taken as the actual length of pile when both
ends are hinged
D = diameter or width of pile
For 5,000 psi < fc < 9000 psi, these stresses may be increased indirect
proportion to the design concrete strength. The buckling load of a pre-tensioned
concrete pile can be computed using the Eulers column formula:
N cr
where
E
I
L
k
2 EI
(kL) 2
The value of E should be chosen to fit the duration of loading that is, a higher
value should be used for dynamic load and a reduced value for sustained load. Since
possibility of an increase in actual load is remote, a factor of safety of 2.0 is
considered sufficient. Thus the allowable load is often set at:
N
N cr
2 EI
2
2(kL) 2
I
c
where
I = moment of inertia of concrete section
c = distance from neutral axis to extreme fiber
152
G.P.Ancog
153
G.P.Ancog